@@lHawkyl I encourage you to do your own reserch if your interested in military tec. Its a given that a smaller production have the more advanced tec, quality instead of quantity.
@@warwarneverchanges4937 Thats a stupid argument once because KMW and Rheinmetall are known for quality and not quantity. And the other reason is that lockheed martin is arguably one of the most advanced and on of the biggest military companys.
The Puma has many technological faults. Just a 30mm Cannon and hasn't anti tank or anti aircraft rockets as standard application It might has a strong amor but it is heavy and quite slow. Water operations are limited.
Pirahna is not an IFV, it's APC, BMP-3 is not an IFV, it's light (and extremely bad) light tank, Kurganets-25 doesn't even exist Rating is a piece of crap
I would vote for the Swedish/BAE Systems CV90 Mk IV because it is PROVEN IN COMBAT, unlike the others. Plus it is of reasonable size and weight for transport and can be fitted with temporary flotation for riverine crossings. CORRECTION: The Russian BMP3 is also "proven in combat" - proven to blow up when hit by western IFV cannon. ;o) I expect the new KURGANETS IFV tube a bit better, just a bit.
That's a ZDB-04 btw, and it's layout is completely different from BMP-3 despite the resemblance in appearance. If you are talking about Type 08 then that's a wheeled amphibious IFV.
I don't really think that these 10 are the best in the world For anyone wanting to talk about this isn't a rating: the video title claims that these 10 are the best IFV's in the world
Well, yes and no. Yes, because incompetent operators, logistic issues, and complete lack of maintenance. But, they're also proving to not be as hyped up as Russia made them out to be (Shocker, I know...).
@Blue on blue hãy đưa K21 vào thực chiến, vào chiến trường, vào cuộc chiến tranh tổng lực quy mô xem thể hiện thế nào. Còn đánh quy ước nhỏ lẻ với phỉ, với phiến quân thì không nói lên được sức mạnh. M2 của Mỹ thậm chí còn không thể đi trên đường bùn lầy ở Ukraina
Just a remark ml explosive reactive armour can’t be placed on BTR or BMP since their armour is so thin that explosive armour will harm the vehicle more than it can protect . It can be reinforced only with composite armour .
JolyRoger BMP 2 and 3 both have been fitted with ERA BMP 2 has been proven not to be worth it and is only in use in modern combat by the DPR and the BMP 3 has a kontakt 5 Kaktus kit in use by Russia which protects it from lots of heat rpg types and Iran is fielding BTR-60PB with ERA as HEIDAR-7
@@jaspermennink7409 which has turned out to be cardboard boxes filled with styrofoam bits. I salute the corrupt Russians, you have made our job much much easier.
@@snikrepak what are you refering to the egg packaging shaped things cuz those are era spacers the keep the era in the bags in their proper location, if you are refering to any other diy stuff from the ukraine coflict show me. also to my knowledge no bmp3s or bmp2s have been serviced in ukraine with era addons so i dont know why you needed to waste your time on responding on a comment thread from more than a year ago
Lynx looks good but the redback is more practical, the suspension is very good, and as a soldier travelling a long distance I dont want to be shaken about before being deployed.
Not to forget: as far as I read online, the puma has a sophisticated softkill protection system that destroys incoming missiles and thus protects the crew. I don’t know if the other vehicles have that at all
@@Xeni1243 Iron Fist is Active Kill.... One more problem, Active-kill on Bradley. It needs more HP and big turret. If this is applied Bradley chassis may not hold this, so stronger chassis may have to applied. So old Bradley looks like to be 'not-upgradable'. New Bradley will be really new.
Your description "Destroy Incoming Missle" is more proper for 'active-kill", 'soft-kill' is deterring the enemy weapon's targeting system. Soft-kill is "almost" basic system for modern Heavy Armor. However, the survival possibility is lower than active-kill (Iron Fist example). But one problem of "Active-kill", it can kill adjacent soldier too, it can be the same side. If active-kill system is applied, the Infantry-IFV/Tank cooperation tactic should be changed accordingly.
@@edvinandersson2796 not really, German news stated it was only one really damaged, the rest was minor things and it seems it was repaired in few days. Don’t know why this shit hit the fan, newspapers stated it could have been political reason… and then again, what is not such motivated in these days 😂
If you just don't judge by size and weight (as it seems they do in this vid.) And also count in economics, multiple use and durability. CV-90 is clearly no.1!
@@angeliquegeorgiou7997 really? also a leopard 2 tanks cant stop a 120 mm smoothgun shot at the frontal armor i would expect. of course the puma is the most protected of all of them here (by faaar. of course. its as heavy as a russian tank and the first tank of germany with also reactive army. i dont know weheather the other Ifvs in that list have reactive army) but do you really think that is true, where did you got the information from?
This is unbelievable that Bradley is better in comparison to Kurganets 25 doesn't make sense. Kurganets better and stronger compare to Bradley for sure
Dwa lata później: BMP-3 okazał się mało odporny na rosyjską taktykę i ukraińskie pociski 12,7 mm, Kurganiec okazał się legendą, podobnie jak inne pojazdy na podwoziu Armata, Puma dokonała żywota na pierwszym większym poligonie. Pierwsze miejsce dla Bradleya, który sprawdził się w boju.
The Israeli intelligence service Massad, which has extensive agents both in Russia and in Ukraine, provided the most accurate data on the conflict. By the way, both sides of the conflitka do not comment on them, which indicates high truthfulness and accuracy. So, as of January 14, 2023, Ukraine's losses are: - 157 thousand dead, 234 thousand wounded, 17,230 people are in captivity. Among the dead are NATO soldiers, primarily Germany, Poland and Lithuania - 2,458 of them, military instructors from the United States and Great Britain were also killed - 23 of them. There are also dead mercenaries - there are 5,360 such people. - 302 aircraft, 212 helicopters, 2,750 vehicles, 6,320 tanks and armored vehicles, 7,360 howitzers (artillery systems) and 497 sams were destroyed. Composition: 734 thousand soldiers (plus 100 thousand reservists) Russia's losses, according to the publication, are as follows: - 18,480 dead, 44,500 wounded, 323 people are in captivity; - The Russian Armed Forces also lost 23 aircraft, 56 helicopters, 200 vehicles, 889 tanks and armored vehicles, 427 howitzers (artillery systems) and 12 SAMs. At the same time, there are 734 thousand soldiers and officers on the battlefield from Ukraine, including NATO representatives and mercenaries. On the part of Russia, 418 thousand soldiers are participating in the war. according to technology, this is a very accurate statistics on personnel there are questions - perhaps this does not include the DNR-LNR Corps and Ukrainian TRO
until the fall of 2022, there were few BMP-3s in the Russian army, mostly used. bmp-1 and bmp-2 Basurmanin. After all, the goals initially - a special military operation - did not involve waging a full-fledged war. BMP-3 especially in the variant of additional modernization taking into account a special military operation - they show themselves well. Kurganets is just very expensive, that's why the T90M breakthrough is now being mass-produced - for 2022 - 300 pcs. approximately, T 72B3M with additional improvements according to the results of its and T80BVM (the fastest tank in the Russian army). And it was decided to upgrade the T62M to the level of T-72B in terms of security, and even better than the standard filling, even the T72B1-2 of the late 80s. The scale of military operations forces us to make a choice - 1000 armat and 1000 units of equipment based on armata or up to 10 thousand units of completely new equipment for a dry test group per year. + + 12,000 pieces of equipment old, but removed from storage, which can be serviced a little technically and immediately sent to the front. As far as I know, Uralvagonzavod has started a series of T-14 Armata and BMPT-terminator and Terminator 2. Previously, this technique was produced in small batches. If you look at what worked best in the Russian army. Missile troops and air defense. The avition is also not bad, but there are gaps due to the small number of su-57 aircraft. Artillery is difficult to assess - yes, the fire wall is in the amount of 10 million. + artillery shells fired in 1 year - helped to avoid large losses, similar to those suffered by the Ukrainian army, but for commissioning systems like himars - it is necessary to increase the satellite grouping by at least 1 order of magnitude. so the areal artillery, in osonovo, was used with the exception of a high-precision Krasnopol projectile similar to Excalibur. The helicopters were very useful and inflicted a colossal fire defeat on the enemy due to high-precision Whirlwind missiles, but the loss of helicopters is one of the most sensitive - 60 pieces is a lot. It is worth noting that in addition to 23 combat fighters at the front, there was also a loss of 10 Russian fighters as a result of accidents.
I was surprised that in Europe they really believe in idiotic propaganda - about washing machines, toilets. Well, you get it. Before Maidan 2014, the property gap between Ukraine and Russia was 3 times, after the gap grew to 7-8 times, then stabilized to 5-4 times. I worked until the last day with people from Ukraine remotely from the regional centers of Kherson. Dnepropetrovsk, etc. I know the situation well. According to the level of development of social infrastructure and development, there is a gap between Ukraine and Russia. By the way, we are not talking about the fact that the citizens of Ukraine, of which 10 million. they were ethnic Russians before the start of the big conflict - they fight badly. It's just that the forces are really not equal - despite the substantial support of NATO and the fact that they got 3 Soviet military districts from the Soviet Union, and at the time of the collapse of the advanced ones. In fact, the air defense system of Ukraine and taking into account the good training of personnel was one of the best in Europe before the Special Military Operation, if not the best - this is a light version of the Russian system - Strela-10 - Needle at the bottom, Osa-Akm, c125 in the latest modifier, TOR division, Buk-M1-M2 in large quantities - 10 divisions with a reserve of missiles for 10 volleys and S300 PMU-1 - - 10- ki divisions with a large number of missiles. + reinforced with steenegers and Cheetahs. They also had Tungiski-M1 - the father of the C1 Shell. The philistine approach is very stupid, unfortunately.
I would especially like to note the generals' blunder with tactical drones, since they are able to compensate for problems with satellite guidance and make even the artillery site accurate enough. But now the problem with drones has been eliminated - now it has become a plus for the Russian army from a minus. The current war in Ukraine will last until the end of almost 2024, in which, however, Poland may also stand up. Of course, most likely, it will eventually be forced to use nuclear weapons, but it will definitely not do this in Eastern Ukraine, since this is our land and our cities - only in an exceptional case. The problem of technology here came out in another high wear of the chassis with such an intensity of hostilities and trunks. Western artillery, by the way, could not cope with such intensity, with the exception of Crabs, which are similar and less whimsical as MSTA-S. In addition, only in February, Russia managed to knock out about 300 artillery systems with the help of kamikaze Lancet and atrillery drones with the help of tactical drones. Stationary systems are generally extremely vulnerable - for this reason, in the Luhansk direction, Ukraine had to remove the remaining 777 and replace them with Soviet 1938 M30 guns, Russia also uses perfectly preserved D-1 guns, operated from 1943 to 1949, the so-called Sledgehammers of Stalingrad! :)) I was particularly proud of their perfect condition: th-cam.com/video/SJMWLr47HYs/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/v6HoPVsLi2I/w-d-xo.html
examples for you of the intensity of fighting at the front in more than 1000 km Maryinka th-cam.com/video/_GZWe8_tNC0/w-d-xo.html Soledar th-cam.com/video/VhyBlMmf8m4/w-d-xo.html
As21 redback is a very nice ifv and will be happy for my Australian soldiers to be fighting in it!, plus we just ordered 40 k9 thunders and 10 ammunition resupply vehicles!!
No Marder? Strange list, it contains models that are either on paper on have never been mass produced. I would consider a ranking of models with over 500 units produced.
well question is if the best ones really are, considering that they are infantry support but with that weight are very terrain dependend and can get stuck easy with need for heavy recovery vehicle
@@zoom5024 it has: turrets are partly manufactured in Finland. I'm in Finnish Defense Forces, you think I don't know what supplies comes from where to us?
Puma is great - on paper. It has the same problem the whole german system currently has: it is overengineered - full of safety and convenience features which prevents to accomplish the main purpose well.
at least it is according to the thousands of regulations it had to follow a save enviroment for pregnant women.. let me quote stauffenberg, lang lebe das heilige Deutschland
Kinda hard to determine which is best, as not all have seen combat. I'd be curious how Chinese units would actually perform/survive on a battlefield. I like the CV....
The m2 Bradley is just not better than the Kurganets i'm sorry but this list is ridiculous. In an objective comparison disregarding all the production issues of the Kurganets and just looking vehicle vs vehicle the Kurganets is much more modern. It employs an APS which the bradley does not, it has a lower profile and an unmanned turret for increased crew survivability, a seperate armored crew compartment for additional crew survivability, it has a 360 unobscured thermal imaging system for the commander which the bradley does not, it has 4 atgm's at the ready instead of the bradleys 2 and can fire them on the move unlike the bradley which has to stop to fire them, and to finish it off the Kurganets has a larger calibre main gun with a much higher firerate.
This is not the best IFV ranking but rather the most expensive IFV ranking. CV-90 best one, the turret is very good. Also you forgot the VBCI IFV, it would be ranked at least at the 8th position in your ranking.
I think the idea of the IFB is to get infantry as close to the front/battle as possible without getting them killed. Getting close, then having all the men (who are probably so scared by this time that actual combat will be less frightening) drop out the back and engage in close combat, but they are probably rarely used for exactly that.
The Red Back and the Lynx 31 look to both be equally in the running, the Red Back's advantage is that it's actually based on the K9 SPH, that has been adopted by Australia as the "Huntsman SP", the Lynx advantage is that it has alot of commonality with the Boxer of which 211 have been ordered for the Australian Army.
I remember when the VW Polo was a small car. Now it's a mid size car that's considerably larger than the original VW Golf (or Rabbit in the US). It's seems that IFVs are taking the same growth hormone and are getting larger with each generation. Some are the size and weight of light tanks. This list is not comparing like with like. Just make a list of the battle-proven IFVs, and especially not the ones that are on someone's drawing board.
40mm cannon is great to use when you see the enemy ifv coming over the the hill with a huge trashcan ontop of the turret... Active armor cant stop a 40mm sabot round
@@militaryanalysis5028 No IFV is "very useful" against MBTs, that's not their primary role. But most of em will get or already have the Spike missiles.
@@zoom5024 I never said IFV main role is to take out tanks, but it is important to have a secondary weapon against hard targets nonetheless to support the infantry in case enemy tanks appear. And a lot of IFV actually do have missiles so they can better fight tanks, but not all IFV have missiles, some do not. And that's why it's a great disadvantage to not have any missiles, because it makes the vehicle weak and vulnerable.
@Yoda are you getting offended ?? Lol, and I dont know that website something . Org but I do know this, the Bradley was ahead of its time taking out Russian tanks. Russian armoured vehicles are scattered all over Afghanistan and the TOW was so impressive, that the Russians copied the design which is less impressive.
@Yoda sad you are still in denial. But the idea of the kornet was influenced by the TOW, the Bradley was good against tanks in wars proved effective, Dont know where you got the idea that it was bad. Russia proved that their tanks were not effective when they laid waste in Afghanistan.
Kind of stupid for the Lynx and Puma to be the top spaces when they BOTH FAILED trails. The puma only has a 30% availability rate on exercise. It’s useless.
Price should be a factor. It's agreed that the Tiger was better than the Sherman however it doesn't matter if something is better than it's competitor if the competition is a lot cheaper to make than it is worse in combat, you can make a lot more of them and you don't have the resources to keep making the superior product.
@@phuelsebeck Production is slated for two phases, with the first 46 Lynx copies and the nine Buffalos to be built in Germany and delivered by early 2023. A second batch of 172 Lynx vehicles will then roll off a future production line in Hungary, for which the company established a joint venture with the Hungarian government last month.
No. BTR is another class - Armored Personnel Carrier (APC). It's just bus for infantry. Usually they have less protection and not so powerful weaponry, usually just machine gun in turret with with just one gunner. They are supposed to transport infantry but are not supposed to fight on battlefield.
For Survivability Warrior should be way higher, Look up Johnson Beharry VC, Show me another IFV that could take so many hits and still survive to fight again
The Bradley has the same cannon as alot of other vehicles like the LAV-25, ACV-300 IFV, GKN Simba AIFV and probably the Bionix 25. Also, the 25mm Bushmaster is kind of outdated in my opinion since it cant punch through walls in the Marawi Crisis.
@@Noorthia No, it's not. Lol. I'm guaranteeing you have absolutely no idea what it's even capable of. All you know it's an American vehicle, ergo it's shit, because you just don't like the US. A fact made obvious by your comment history. Just another filthy troll.
Well that didnt last long, the new CV90 blows all the others away
CV 90 might be more battle proven then the Puma but definitely not better.
@@lHawkyl Does the puma have celcius components? Nope
@@warwarneverchanges4937 how does this make the cv90 better in amy way?
@@lHawkyl I encourage you to do your own reserch if your interested in military tec. Its a given that a smaller production have the more advanced tec, quality instead of quantity.
@@warwarneverchanges4937 Thats a stupid argument once because KMW and Rheinmetall are known for quality and not quantity. And the other reason is that lockheed martin is arguably one of the most advanced and on of the biggest military companys.
The Germans know how to make tanks and ride them to neighboring countries 😆
@Yoda Nope
@Yoda similar to russian junk aircrafts
Of course we know how to build tanks think about the panther and tiger😂😉😎💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
No.
The Puma has many technological faults. Just a 30mm Cannon and hasn't anti tank or anti aircraft rockets as standard application
It might has a strong amor but it is heavy and quite slow.
Water operations are limited.
Pirahna is not an IFV, it's APC, BMP-3 is not an IFV, it's light (and extremely bad) light tank, Kurganets-25 doesn't even exist
Rating is a piece of crap
Türk firmaların bütün ihaleleri domine etmesine rağmen bir tane bile Türk aracı olmaması ne saçma...
Lynx has already be purchased by Hungarian Armed Forces, this video's related content is outdated.
well that happens with videos.... they can´t change overtime you fool
I mean who cares? Only important facts were told. Origin of the vehicle wont change would it?
I would vote for the Swedish/BAE Systems CV90 Mk IV because it is PROVEN IN COMBAT, unlike the others. Plus it is of reasonable size and weight for transport and can be fitted with temporary flotation for riverine crossings.
CORRECTION: The Russian BMP3 is also "proven in combat" - proven to blow up when hit by western IFV cannon. ;o)
I expect the new KURGANETS IFV tube a bit better, just a bit.
‘’PROVEN IN COMBAT’’ ? Can you shout out where it has been in combat?
With your logic nobody beats the BMP1
@@alanaldpal950 Afghanistan by Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Sweden also used it in Liberia UN mission
@@radiozvrk6784 I get your point but it's still combat. And you're wrong.
Also, why wouldn't it get support? Anything is obsolete withouth support.
Hasn't the Bradley seen combat... ?
Where is the french VBCI ? It’s surely one of the fastest infantry fighting vehicle in the world, with good armor, good weapons and good range.
Yeah but it's French (just joking)
Combat aproved
How about ascod 2
That's a ZDB-04 btw, and it's layout is completely different from BMP-3 despite the resemblance in appearance. If you are talking about Type 08 then that's a wheeled amphibious IFV.
Puma was deemed battle ready by the Bundeswehr a few days ago. Bugs are gone, Spike is integrated and works.
But only at a few tanks.
@pax. You mean hundreds of them.
@@HedgehogZone Not enough. 1000 would be nice.
@@RandomGuy9 dafaq? NO!
@Goodie pretty sure if your over 5.10 you cant fit inside it🤣
Small, Fast, and powerful is the trend of modern war machines.
@samyajyoti de that's true
Thats not the case, tanks/armored vehicles has grown in size. Compare them from ww2 until today.
@samyajyoti de only that? Most tanks today are larger than before
@samyajyoti de ill give a some proof th-cam.com/video/2o9yuUZIL4Q/w-d-xo.html
@samyajyoti de pls...
Puma in the first place??, this video aged badly
It's not a ranking video. Just 10 ifv's
I ❤️ the design of the lynx. It is the design of the future...
True
Klauen projekt PL-01 Concept!
@@lukaskania6879 in reality the PL-01 is based on the Swedish Strf 9040T ifv.
@@CriscCiaddu anders? Pt01 Concept?
@@lukaskania6879 Yes, it is different.
The Pumas cannot even be used yet as they have so-many faults and reliability problems. How can they possibly be at No#1?
I don't really think that these 10 are the best in the world
For anyone wanting to talk about this isn't a rating: the video title claims that these 10 are the best IFV's in the world
Nice video keep up the good videos.
🇩🇪💪 nice Video
Weird ranking. Comparison without reliable sources. - Puma emergency vehicle so high ranked? - Where is AMV Patria, KTO Rosomak ?
Weight of two new German IFVs is just insane, they are heavier than many tanks
*Proceeds to ignore the T-15 50 ton behemoth of the Russians*
@@DoitsuRyoku T-15 is prototype and probably won't get into the production.
@@Mandrak789 It is in production and the first batch already delivered.
Heavy and faster than tanks
@@Mandrak789 is not a prototype, is already in mass production.
The ch90 wasn't designed by the swedish defence materiel administration but Hägglunds vehicle AB :)
If I had to choose one, it would undoubtedly be a new CV90
Especially the new CV90, chek out matsimus channel
@@warwarneverchanges4937 That's exactly the one I mean:)
Top 10 ifv:
1 puma
2 Boxer
3 CV 90
4 Bradley
5 Striker
6 Namer
7 Ajax
8 Lav
9 guarani
10 BMP
So no EBRC Jaguar for France and Belgium?
Aight, I'ma head out...
You may want to remove the Russian BMP3 from this list after the Ukrainian war. Those things are getting obliterated!
Seems to be a problem of tactics and logistics as well as morale more than anything so can't really tell how "bad" it really is.
@@Flex2212 Agreed, Russian tactics and strategy, or lack thereof, are obviously a contributing factor.
Well, yes and no. Yes, because incompetent operators, logistic issues, and complete lack of maintenance. But, they're also proving to not be as hyped up as Russia made them out to be (Shocker, I know...).
Bro, this video is fucking 1 years old. Do you think they will take a look at your comment? Use common sense for fuck sake
It’s not the ofc it’s the crew now I am not praising Russians just saying an ofc is only as good as it’s crew even a great crew can operate a bad tank
Wow! The number 3 is a K21. It's not bad! Thank for giving me new information everytime!
K21 thậm chí còn kém xa cả BMP1, BMP2.
@Blue on blue hãy đưa K21 vào thực chiến, vào chiến trường, vào cuộc chiến tranh tổng lực quy mô xem thể hiện thế nào. Còn đánh quy ước nhỏ lẻ với phỉ, với phiến quân thì không nói lên được sức mạnh. M2 của Mỹ thậm chí còn không thể đi trên đường bùn lầy ở Ukraina
We know now all Russian vehicles can be removed from the list so that puts the British vehicle up to #7
01, Cv90 /bradley
02, k-21/ Piranha V / Warrior
03, BMP-3 / ZDB-08 / KURGANETS-25
04, Lynx KF-41 / Puma
th-cam.com/video/tY-UpygOee8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=G7t9aMVhrcTrp9-Y
where are the Namer, Eitan, and Boxer
I think cv90 deserves numero uno because its very customizable and has a lot of different versions
Like any other modern IFV
I think you can attach a Leopard 120mm gun on the lynx and Puma
@@elduderino4983 So just like a CV90-120, light tank.
@@niina83 yes, all are very customizable. So its not only a abilty of the CV90 and not a reason to become "numero uno"
@@elduderino4983 i agree with ya.
Just wanted to share that info to keep people informed.
Just a remark ml explosive reactive armour can’t be placed on BTR or BMP since their armour is so thin that explosive armour will harm the vehicle more than it can protect . It can be reinforced only with composite armour .
there is explosive reactive armour for BMP-3 called Cactus
JolyRoger BMP 2 and 3 both have been fitted with ERA BMP 2 has been proven not to be worth it and is only in use in modern combat by the DPR and the BMP 3 has a kontakt 5 Kaktus kit in use by Russia which protects it from lots of heat rpg types and Iran is fielding BTR-60PB with ERA as HEIDAR-7
It is integrated in BMP-3 and in the next Generation BMP replacement. T15 AND kurganez 25.
@@jaspermennink7409 which has turned out to be cardboard boxes filled with styrofoam bits. I salute the corrupt Russians, you have made our job much much easier.
@@snikrepak what are you refering to the egg packaging shaped things cuz those are era spacers the keep the era in the bags in their proper location, if you are refering to any other diy stuff from the ukraine coflict show me. also to my knowledge no bmp3s or bmp2s have been serviced in ukraine with era addons so i dont know why you needed to waste your time on responding on a comment thread from more than a year ago
I would put the cv90 higher
This video is too owsome i like that video and your voice is so beautiful
After 2 years Puma still doesnt work :D
0:42 " its not a ranking video"
puts Germany on number one and two
Thats just how german engineering works want the best? come to germany
They ain't even good.
The puma has many bugs and the missiles aren't integrated in most of the IFVs
Lynx looks good but the redback is more practical, the suspension is very good, and as a soldier travelling a long distance I dont want to be shaken about before being deployed.
Haha I guess you are talking about apex😀
Lynx and Puma also have very good suspension where the crew-comparment is decoupled
Toyota Pick Up should be on the top 1🙄
It's a Ute, mate, a ute.
Might need to revisit this list after recent events. Some vehicles on this list _might_ have proven to be not nearly as good.
Coughs in Russian garbage tech
@@eli4984 Ukrainians have the same tech when it comes to IFVs
The best should have gone to the armata T-15,which you willingly omitted.
who products it? Only several pieces have been made despite the announecements of thousands of them in russian army in 2020
It's literally not in service yet. Lol
@@willthorson4543 Lynx and Kurganets-25 also.
On a 1v1 a t 15 is better but if you look at production where 300 pumas already build and coming only 15 t -15 exist
@@willthorson4543 they are tough
I think the Bradley is doing it job.
May not be the best but can go toe to toe.
th-cam.com/video/tY-UpygOee8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=G7t9aMVhrcTrp9-Y
Not to forget: as far as I read online, the puma has a sophisticated softkill protection system that destroys incoming missiles and thus protects the crew. I don’t know if the other vehicles have that at all
newest version of Bradley would be equipped with such a system in the close future - the system itself is called Iron Fist
@@Xeni1243 Iron Fist is Active Kill.... One more problem, Active-kill on Bradley. It needs more HP and big turret. If this is applied Bradley chassis may not hold this, so stronger chassis may have to applied. So old Bradley looks like to be 'not-upgradable'. New Bradley will be really new.
Your description "Destroy Incoming Missle" is more proper for 'active-kill", 'soft-kill' is deterring the enemy weapon's targeting system. Soft-kill is "almost" basic system for modern Heavy Armor. However, the survival possibility is lower than active-kill (Iron Fist example).
But one problem of "Active-kill", it can kill adjacent soldier too, it can be the same side. If active-kill system is applied, the Infantry-IFV/Tank cooperation tactic should be changed accordingly.
Puma also failed in 18 tests
@@edvinandersson2796 not really, German news stated it was only one really damaged, the rest was minor things and it seems it was repaired in few days. Don’t know why this shit hit the fan, newspapers stated it could have been political reason… and then again, what is not such motivated in these days 😂
This such BS...there is none of these presented that beat the most modern version of the Swedish CV90. Period!
Lynx Kf 41 best ,,
We can say that first in a couple of years when the lynx had some operations
@@babyyoda3497 well will see ,
So why has no country bought Puma and so many bought (for example) CV90??
Because the CV90 has been on the market for two decades longer.
Tulpar deserves to be on the list. If you search, you will agree.
There are only 4 made, nobody knows about the performance.
LOL Kurganets-25 does not even exist.
If you just don't judge by size and weight (as it seems they do in this vid.) And also count in economics, multiple use and durability. CV-90 is clearly no.1!
@Goodie why?
The puma is superior.
The Puma and Lynx can stop a 120 and 125mm tank round on the frontal armor
@@angeliquegeorgiou7997 really? also a leopard 2 tanks cant stop a 120 mm smoothgun shot at the frontal armor i would expect. of course the puma is the most protected of all of them here (by faaar. of course. its as heavy as a russian tank and the first tank of germany with also reactive army. i dont know weheather the other Ifvs in that list have reactive army) but do you really think that is true, where did you got the information from?
This is unbelievable that Bradley is better in comparison to Kurganets 25 doesn't make sense. Kurganets better and stronger compare to Bradley for sure
This isn't a "ranking video". Did you not understand? It's just that the M2 is higher on the list not in order of "better".
Imagine shooting at the puma and your shell is bouncing 😐
And the Italian Freccia?
Sei italiano?
@@RTankist Si
Non dare retta a questa top 20
È fatta male
Sto canale da false informazioni sui carri armati
Dwa lata później: BMP-3 okazał się mało odporny na rosyjską taktykę i ukraińskie pociski 12,7 mm, Kurganiec okazał się legendą, podobnie jak inne pojazdy na podwoziu Armata, Puma dokonała żywota na pierwszym większym poligonie. Pierwsze miejsce dla Bradleya, który sprawdził się w boju.
The Israeli intelligence service Massad, which has extensive agents both in Russia and in Ukraine, provided the most accurate data on the conflict. By the way, both sides of the conflitka do not comment on them, which indicates high truthfulness and accuracy.
So, as of January 14, 2023, Ukraine's losses are:
- 157 thousand dead, 234 thousand wounded, 17,230 people are in captivity. Among the dead are NATO soldiers, primarily Germany, Poland and Lithuania - 2,458 of them, military instructors from the United States and Great Britain were also killed - 23 of them. There are also dead mercenaries - there are 5,360 such people.
- 302 aircraft, 212 helicopters, 2,750 vehicles, 6,320 tanks and armored vehicles, 7,360 howitzers (artillery systems) and 497 sams were destroyed.
Composition: 734 thousand soldiers (plus 100 thousand reservists)
Russia's losses, according to the publication, are as follows:
- 18,480 dead, 44,500 wounded, 323 people are in captivity;
- The Russian Armed Forces also lost 23 aircraft, 56 helicopters, 200 vehicles, 889 tanks and armored vehicles, 427 howitzers (artillery systems) and 12 SAMs.
At the same time, there are 734 thousand soldiers and officers on the battlefield from Ukraine, including NATO representatives and mercenaries.
On the part of Russia, 418 thousand soldiers are participating in the war.
according to technology, this is a very accurate statistics on personnel there are questions - perhaps this does not include the DNR-LNR Corps and Ukrainian TRO
until the fall of 2022, there were few BMP-3s in the Russian army, mostly used. bmp-1 and bmp-2 Basurmanin. After all, the goals initially - a special military operation - did not involve waging a full-fledged war. BMP-3 especially in the variant of additional modernization taking into account a special military operation - they show themselves well. Kurganets is just very expensive, that's why the T90M breakthrough is now being mass-produced - for 2022 - 300 pcs. approximately, T 72B3M with additional improvements according to the results of its and T80BVM (the fastest tank in the Russian army). And it was decided to upgrade the T62M to the level of T-72B in terms of security, and even better than the standard filling, even the T72B1-2 of the late 80s. The scale of military operations forces us to make a choice - 1000 armat and 1000 units of equipment based on armata or up to 10 thousand units of completely new equipment for a dry test group per year. + + 12,000 pieces of equipment old, but removed from storage, which can be serviced a little technically and immediately sent to the front. As far as I know, Uralvagonzavod has started a series of T-14 Armata and BMPT-terminator and Terminator 2. Previously, this technique was produced in small batches. If you look at what worked best in the Russian army. Missile troops and air defense. The avition is also not bad, but there are gaps due to the small number of su-57 aircraft. Artillery is difficult to assess - yes, the fire wall is in the amount of 10 million. + artillery shells fired in 1 year - helped to avoid large losses, similar to those suffered by the Ukrainian army, but for commissioning systems like himars - it is necessary to increase the satellite grouping by at least 1 order of magnitude. so the areal artillery, in osonovo, was used with the exception of a high-precision Krasnopol projectile similar to Excalibur.
The helicopters were very useful and inflicted a colossal fire defeat on the enemy due to high-precision Whirlwind missiles, but the loss of helicopters is one of the most sensitive - 60 pieces is a lot.
It is worth noting that in addition to 23 combat fighters at the front, there was also a loss of 10 Russian fighters as a result of accidents.
I was surprised that in Europe they really believe in idiotic propaganda - about washing machines, toilets. Well, you get it. Before Maidan 2014, the property gap between Ukraine and Russia was 3 times, after the gap grew to 7-8 times, then stabilized to 5-4 times. I worked until the last day with people from Ukraine remotely from the regional centers of Kherson. Dnepropetrovsk, etc. I know the situation well. According to the level of development of social infrastructure and development, there is a gap between Ukraine and Russia. By the way, we are not talking about the fact that the citizens of Ukraine, of which 10 million. they were ethnic Russians before the start of the big conflict - they fight badly. It's just that the forces are really not equal - despite the substantial support of NATO and the fact that they got 3 Soviet military districts from the Soviet Union, and at the time of the collapse of the advanced ones. In fact, the air defense system of Ukraine and taking into account the good training of personnel was one of the best in Europe before the Special Military Operation, if not the best - this is a light version of the Russian system - Strela-10 - Needle at the bottom, Osa-Akm, c125 in the latest modifier, TOR division, Buk-M1-M2 in large quantities - 10 divisions with a reserve of missiles for 10 volleys and S300 PMU-1 - - 10- ki divisions with a large number of missiles. + reinforced with steenegers and Cheetahs. They also had Tungiski-M1 - the father of the C1 Shell. The philistine approach is very stupid, unfortunately.
I would especially like to note the generals' blunder with tactical drones, since they are able to compensate for problems with satellite guidance and make even the artillery site accurate enough. But now the problem with drones has been eliminated - now it has become a plus for the Russian army from a minus. The current war in Ukraine will last until the end of almost 2024, in which, however, Poland may also stand up. Of course, most likely, it will eventually be forced to use nuclear weapons, but it will definitely not do this in Eastern Ukraine, since this is our land and our cities - only in an exceptional case. The
problem of technology here came out in another high wear of the chassis with such an intensity of hostilities and trunks. Western artillery, by the way, could not cope with such intensity, with the exception of Crabs, which are similar and less whimsical as MSTA-S.
In addition, only in February, Russia managed to knock out about 300 artillery systems with the help of kamikaze Lancet and atrillery drones with the help of tactical drones. Stationary systems are generally extremely vulnerable - for this reason, in the Luhansk direction, Ukraine had to remove the remaining 777 and replace them with Soviet 1938 M30 guns, Russia also uses perfectly preserved D-1 guns, operated from 1943 to 1949, the so-called Sledgehammers of Stalingrad! :))
I was particularly proud of their perfect condition:
th-cam.com/video/SJMWLr47HYs/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/v6HoPVsLi2I/w-d-xo.html
examples for you of the intensity of fighting at the front in more than 1000 km
Maryinka
th-cam.com/video/_GZWe8_tNC0/w-d-xo.html
Soledar
th-cam.com/video/VhyBlMmf8m4/w-d-xo.html
Where is ASCOD? And how many units of Lynx and Kurganets-25 are in service?
I think the ASCOD should be in the list.
@@hermosoloremalaga me too
140 lynx is in service in Hungary
@@bulcsutoth1134 Nope. In 2025 maybe.
Korean Red Bag will win an order for the Australian armored car business.
As21 redback is a very nice ifv and will be happy for my Australian soldiers to be fighting in it!, plus we just ordered 40 k9 thunders and 10 ammunition resupply vehicles!!
No Marder? Strange list, it contains models that are either on paper on have never been mass produced. I would consider a ranking of models with over 500 units produced.
What‘s with ASCOD from Austria and Spain
Super video
well question is if the best ones really are, considering that they are infantry support but with that weight are very terrain dependend and can get stuck easy with need for heavy recovery vehicle
The HANWHA Redback super cedes all these obsolete IFVs, the only vehicle that comes close is the LYNX.
You forgot that CV 9030 is produced by Sweden *and* Finland and also Finland uses this as its main IFV.
Dont think Finland has anything to do with the production of the CV90.
@@zoom5024 it has: turrets are partly manufactured in Finland. I'm in Finnish Defense Forces, you think I don't know what supplies comes from where to us?
@@roponen332 and you invented it or did Sweden just set up shop in Finland whwn u bought CV90s?
@@zoom5024 go read about CV9030 FIN; you will find out your answers.
@@roponen332 that is not the original vehicle the cv90 platform is Swedish
I would take a modern version of cv90 anyday.
surprised to not see VBCI and Badger
PUMA.. This hasn't aged well.
Puma is great - on paper. It has the same problem the whole german system currently has: it is overengineered - full of safety and convenience features which prevents to accomplish the main purpose well.
at least it is according to the thousands of regulations it had to follow a save enviroment for pregnant women.. let me quote stauffenberg, lang lebe das heilige Deutschland
@@wolflarsen1900 that's a myth that was debunked years ago
@@wolflarsen1900 Weird.
Kinda hard to determine which is best, as not all have seen combat. I'd be curious how Chinese units would actually perform/survive on a battlefield. I like the CV....
The m2 Bradley is just not better than the Kurganets i'm sorry but this list is ridiculous.
In an objective comparison disregarding all the production issues of the Kurganets and just looking vehicle vs vehicle the Kurganets is much more modern.
It employs an APS which the bradley does not, it has a lower profile and an unmanned turret for increased crew survivability, a seperate armored crew compartment for additional crew survivability, it has a 360 unobscured thermal imaging system for the commander which the bradley does not, it has 4 atgm's at the ready instead of the bradleys 2 and can fire them on the move unlike the bradley which has to stop to fire them, and to finish it off the Kurganets has a larger calibre main gun with a much higher firerate.
This is not the best IFV ranking but rather the most expensive IFV ranking.
CV-90 best one, the turret is very good.
Also you forgot the VBCI IFV, it would be ranked at least at the 8th position in your ranking.
lol
I think the idea of the IFB is to get infantry as close to the front/battle as possible without getting them killed. Getting close, then having all the men (who are probably so scared by this time that actual combat will be less frightening) drop out the back and engage in close combat, but they are probably rarely used for exactly that.
Bradley is rated to high Id put in in 8th or 7th
Lmfao you are smoking crack. One of the best ifv platforms in service and has more kills then the Abrams in Iraq
@@Ragedmayhem its not top 5 bro, stop meat riding the US
AND THE SPANISH "DRAGÓN " VCR 8×8, 30 mm. Cannon and Misiles Spike.
What about ASCOD From Spain and Austria? Since it rececetly update ASCOD 2 I think it may be worth mentioning it.
The ascod is rated as a mediem mbt and not and ifv
@@junkablyet944 In Spain we use as IFV 30mm cannon. The export version with 105/120 mm canon is MMBT.
Lol you forgot the Dardo Ifv and the Freccia Ifv. Also the french Ifv are good.
t-15 is better aparantly, but puma and lynx can be mass produced whilst t-15 is still in trials
Not really the puma is just as complex as the t-15. The t-15 is a paper lion amd will likely never fully integrate in the russian army.
Yay, Germany has the first two places!!! 🇩🇪
@Yoda If it would be western biased an american would be 1.
@@GenossePaul That's what you think, you are just jealous and don't want to realise your country is NOT the best country in the world!!!😂
@@maxiona714 My country isnt in the Nato
@@GenossePaul From what country are you then?
@@maxiona714 Finland, we have Leopards tho
Интересно , а где БМП Т - 15
« Армата » с дистанционно - управляемым универсальным боевым модулем
« Кинжал »
М2 Бредли
Годы производства 1980 - 1989 ,остальное модернизация ,5 место -занавес ! ,расходимся нас на***ли !
Pfui deibel🤮🤮🤮🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
@@K1NC11 американський TH-cam канал)) курганець краще!!
@@STRYKER1467 Ну вообще то канал Индийский, но это ничего не меняет,просто принцип формирования рейтинга непонятен!
@@K1NC11 це несправедливо
Hope the South Korean Red Back bid wins the Australian LAND 400 series contract for supply of MICV
The Red Back and the Lynx 31 look to both be equally in the running, the Red Back's advantage is that it's actually based on the K9 SPH, that has been adopted by Australia as the "Huntsman SP", the Lynx advantage is that it has alot of commonality with the Boxer of which 211 have been ordered for the Australian Army.
Lynx looks like a badass vehicle!
I remember when the VW Polo was a small car. Now it's a mid size car that's considerably larger than the original VW Golf (or Rabbit in the US). It's seems that IFVs are taking the same growth hormone and are getting larger with each generation. Some are the size and weight of light tanks. This list is not comparing like with like. Just make a list of the battle-proven IFVs, and especially not the ones that are on someone's drawing board.
Kurganets - is russian fake because no one vehicle were seen in ruzzian invade.
The Russian T15 and Israli Namer IFVs look promising, but I could understand excluding them since they aren't in full production yet.
same for Lynx
So, your #1, Puma, the moment it was supposed to enter the real field became just a big embarrassment
40mm cannon is great to use when you see the enemy ifv coming over the the hill with a huge trashcan ontop of the turret... Active armor cant stop a 40mm sabot round
And even if it could, it would not be able to stop a burst of them 😁
Yeah but it's Not very useful against heavy armor from MBTs. So it still needs missiles to Fight heavily armored targets
@@militaryanalysis5028 No IFV is "very useful" against MBTs, that's not their primary role. But most of em will get or already have the Spike missiles.
@@militaryanalysis5028 IFSs were never meant to try to take out MBTs.
@@zoom5024 I never said IFV main role is to take out tanks, but it is important to have a secondary weapon against hard targets nonetheless to support the infantry in case enemy tanks appear. And a lot of IFV actually do have missiles so they can better fight tanks, but not all IFV have missiles, some do not. And that's why it's a great disadvantage to not have any missiles, because it makes the vehicle weak and vulnerable.
M2 Bradley better than the BMP-3 and Kur25?
Lmaooooooo my ass
When the K-21 makes it to the 3rd spot, you know this list is fictional at best.
Bradley is the best and has proven that lol envy
@Yoda nope lol these Bad boy Bradley's killed Russian tanks and had a impressive design from the rest
@Yoda are you getting offended ?? Lol, and I dont know that website something . Org but I do know this, the Bradley was ahead of its time taking out Russian tanks. Russian armoured vehicles are scattered all over Afghanistan and the TOW was so impressive, that the Russians copied the design which is less impressive.
@Yoda sad you are still in denial. But the idea of the kornet was influenced by the TOW, the Bradley was good against tanks in wars proved effective, Dont know where you got the idea that it was bad. Russia proved that their tanks were not effective when they laid waste in Afghanistan.
lynx kf 41 Germany-Hungary
@Alex Knap Hungary will produce it also.
CV90, Puma, Bradley, Warrior, K21.
Wow k21
박수치라우👏👏
from kim jung un
Kind of stupid for the Lynx and Puma to be the top spaces when they BOTH FAILED trails. The puma only has a 30% availability rate on exercise. It’s useless.
and Germans take the award
happy to see us at the top 2 places
actually the boxxer is missing in the entire list. probably not included to dont have 3 german tanks at the top. most people here wouldnt endure that
All.only opinion ...nothing can be judged until its proven on Battlefield ..and Battlefields can be so different...from Desert , Mud or Ice ..
As a Puma driver I can say it is a great IFV but it comes with an 18 million dollar price tag. Which is way too much
Price should be a factor. It's agreed that the Tiger was better than the Sherman however it doesn't matter if something is better than it's competitor if the competition is a lot cheaper to make than it is worse in combat, you can make a lot more of them and you don't have the resources to keep making the superior product.
I miss the ascod in the list
新坦克支援车和战车应打坦克， 反装甲，防空， 反导，大无人机， 火力支援， 反登陆。高自动化。 低维护。隐身，高速， 高机动。 主动装甲。60mm雷达，激光制导快炮。
Reminds me of my army time back in 1990 as I have been an IFV Gunner ...
They forgot the Patria IFV from Finland, from what I just read it was reputed better and more reliable than the Puma.
Yes, Patria, and Pandur as well.
HUNGARY LYNX KF41!!!!
They bought a lot of them. But did not created them 😉
@@phuelsebeck Production is slated for two phases, with the first 46 Lynx copies and the nine Buffalos to be built in Germany and delivered by early 2023. A second batch of 172 Lynx vehicles will then roll off a future production line in Hungary, for which the company established a joint venture with the Hungarian government last month.
@@MagyarTurk1 But even then you are only the cheap idiots who built it, but not the intelligent ingenieurs who invented and developed the lynx
@@eagelseye8089 Thanks!!! And Hungary and Germany make the new Boxer: th-cam.com/video/qgqBzsue6EI/w-d-xo.html
@@eagelseye8089 have fun in gemanistan
Are the Russian BTR variants IFV's?
I love how unique and lovely this lady's narrating voice is.
No. Wheeled.
No. BTR is another class - Armored Personnel Carrier (APC). It's just bus for infantry. Usually they have less protection and not so powerful weaponry, usually just machine gun in turret with with just one gunner. They are supposed to transport infantry but are not supposed to fight on battlefield.
Imagine forgetting the t15 armata with the 57mm auto cannon and 4 ataka ATGM, joke
And how many pieces of mighty Armata is in service?
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 240
@@TheSovietWombat LOL, what is the source of this information?
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 uralvagonzavod design bureau of military transport and technology, korelyev insitute website
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 yes sir, fax first, i respect ur respect
cougar in first place, all 10 broke only from the fact that they drove on a flat road.
For Survivability Warrior should be way higher, Look up Johnson Beharry VC, Show me another IFV that could take so many hits and still survive to fight again
Idk about T-15 Armata
Does this video need to be updated? It cites 2020 data...
I love BMP 3 and M2 Bradley cuz they are really powerful!
the bradley is shit.
@@Noorthia have you seen?
The Bradley has the same cannon as alot of other vehicles like the LAV-25, ACV-300 IFV, GKN Simba AIFV and probably the Bionix 25.
Also, the 25mm Bushmaster is kind of outdated in my opinion since it cant punch through walls in the Marawi Crisis.
@@Noorthia No, it's not. Lol. I'm guaranteeing you have absolutely no idea what it's even capable of. All you know it's an American vehicle, ergo it's shit, because you just don't like the US. A fact made obvious by your comment history. Just another filthy troll.