A new video yayy. Technically my first regular video of this year. I know I did a video with my girlfriend and did 2 shorts. What do you think about Minecraft RTX? Let me know here. Or join the discord to continue the discussion: discord.gg/SS2TCZPcSa
For me RTX is not buggy at all, though my AMD graphics card is not the best so to remove input delay when using RTX I have to lower my screen resolution from 1440p to 1080p, and if I am using mods then I have to lower it to 720p, but even with 1440p I still get a consistent 144 fps, and I am using an rtx pack WITH heightmaps and fogs. (It is the vanilla RTX texture pack from mcpedl. )
@@Kakerate2 BRUH IT IS NOT UNPLAYABLE his RTX is only unplayable because he has a bad graphics card, my graphics card is not very good either but as long as you have a really good graphics card then it will run PERFECTLY mine is an AMD graphics card but i would recomend u get a nvidia graphics card so u can also use upscaling which makes the performance MUCH better
@@8crafter yeah RTX was pretty much designed with nvidia cards in mind so it would make sense that it doesnt work right on AMD cards. Its a shame that ML and RTX is exclusive to nvidia atm.
@@Kakerate2 It might be my hardware or the resource pack I'm using, but on occasion when loading up a world, some textures won't load and I sometimes come across a random chunk that doesn't render water properly. It might be my CPU bottlenecking, but the graphics still look amazing. It's totally playable, just some minor visual bugs. I'm also using Bedrock's RTX from NVidia with the Defined PBR resource pack.
I was upset about Super Duper Graphics being canceled, but RTX looked absolutely beautiful and made me really want an RTX graphics card to try it out for myself. I was pretty disappointed when I did try it, especially when I found out you could only use the really good RTX shaders on pre-made worlds.
They constantly do this and have done so for years but the community has failed to punish them so they have continued to get away with it. It's soooo infuriating, I genuinely have grown to despise them so much over the years.
@@YourMomsAltAccount nah you should see the comments when any new update comes out, its like 70% negative ever since caves and cliffs and rightfully so
Yeah, I imagined this would be like a built-in feature you could enable as a graphical setting for any world. The fact that it not only has to be downloaded from elsewhere and can only be used in pre-made marketplace worlds makes it really just a tech demo. This was released years ago and has never been fully implemented into the base game.
It’s more infuriating that the option is on consoles but it’s greyed out. It makes me wonder what the point of putting the toggle on there is even for.
Its absurd when you look at Nvidias social media advertising Minecraft RTX every now and then. I wonder how many people bought RTX cards for Minecraft like i did.
I'm so glad I didn't fall for Nvidias RTX-crap, I used a 1080 which could run Minecraft with Shaders. Not Raytracing, but dayum they looked almost as fancy and didn't suck up all the performance.
@@winni2701 I didn’t fall for their crap, I looked at bench marks of games I want to play and saw Nvidia had the best price to performance in my budget.
@@winni2701 I don’t have enough 💀I’ll admit, that was definitely a downside. I don’t regret it though cause I don’t play many newer games or plan to except for GTA 6 when ever that comes out which probably won’t be for years. Then, I’ll upgrade. At the time I bought my card, I still wouldn’t have gotten anything else and am still happy with my choice given what I use my PC for tbh.
I’ve tried different rtx packs on my survival world, the biggest issue is light is very “hard” - when I dig a cave only direct light lights up walls, which is unrealistic because light should bounce from all but most black surfaces. It makes it very hard mining for anything or exploring caves( Also many devs ad glossy mirror like effect to too many blocks - earth, grass, stones - those should not be mirrors
You have to make sure as well you have the most up-to-date pack or one that's made correctly or else everything will be reflective. If the is made correctly those things you mentioned that I reflective should not be
@@crestofhonor2349 ray-traicing part is realistic, but not fully. Light is being reflect from pretty much every surface, and even air particles dissipate it so if there's light around the corner you will get some light as well (not alot of course).
October 2023 update: Shaders are confirmed for consoles! In the latest Minecraft preview on Xbox Series S/X, PC, and Android you can turn on an experimental render dragon feature that allows you to turn on a new video setting called Deferred Technical Preview, this allows you play Minecraft with PBR(Physically Based Rendering) - Enabled packs, Its not exactly ray-tracing but it comes super close and it looks amazing and it still has the lighting features and block details that look beautiful. Currently you're gonna have to download a PBR - Enabled pack and there is no official mojang PBR pack but more and more PBR packs are being added everyday online and some of them are really good and its less buggy than RTX believe it or not!
When I tried out RTX Minecraft a few months ago on the provided marketplace maps I found it was either buggy or completely broken at times with issues with lighting, particularly glitched chunks with the RTX lighting. It seemed like it had been abandoned. I would love to see it come to Java Edition, at least support for the hardware on AMD, Nvidia and Intel GPU and Im sure it would be made use of by shaders.
Just use a 3rd party rtx pack for Minecraft bedrock from mcpedl or some other online source (my recommendation is the Vanilla RTX texture pack from mcpedl as it works great for me on my AMD graphics card (if ur graphics card is not very good use the vanilla RTX normals subpack instead (it is on the same mcpedl page as the other one))
@@danzjz3923 Yes, iv tried it and got somewhere around 50 FPS at the time. Might be bit higher now as I change my CPU since then but I wouldn't expect more than a few extra frames or better frame time consistency. Discovered the games base performance had improved around 2* from testing between 1.18 and 1.19. Found Optifine to degredate performance in 1.19. I used the same world for testing and same area of the map. It was quite pretty. Edit: I have not tried the HRR version but the full resolution, I will have to give it a try at some point.
The reason why you can't use the pack for another world in theory is because of copyright and encryption... In practice, this makes the system heavy, messy, and poses a high security risk. -> lose money, sue, etc In a word: profits and moneys.
You can get RTX Packs from MCPEDL, and the popular ones are Kelly's RTX, Defined PBR, RealSource RTX, Lumen RTX, Vanilla RTX these are all created by the Community
so in other words.. Nvidia are being dicks about it. i dont see any legitimate reason not to just make the shaders part of the game and let you use them anywhere
The problem here, is that Mojang and nVidia have dropped the ball in PR for this, and this was largely Microsoft and nVidia's baby to begin with. In reality, It's out of beta, still receiving updates and working fine. I've been playing it for weeks. You do NOT need an official world or their texture packs -- if you know what you are doing. The documentation on how the RTX texture pack formats work are out there if you search for them. With a little patience and know-how, the high-res PBR textures released for Java versions using shaders CAN be adapted to and work well as RTX packs. No additional modding (e.g., Optifine, etc) is required. What's not happening is new official content releases talking about it, or texture packs which have kept up with the changes to the RTX texture format. Granted, I've been tweaking the custom fustercluck of a texturepack that I use myself as the changes occur, so I've not had to care about whether or not new packs are released by some publisher or not. That being said, I am not the average end-user of Minecraft either.
Super Duper Graphics Pack was not at all raytraced. "high end graphics" does not equal raytracing. Raytracing (in simple non-technical terms) specifically means the computer simulates light bouncing per pixel from shooting "rays" from the camera to detect where light bounces at.
What drives me crazy about Mojang/Microsoft is the hypocrisy they have inside their development management. As i remember "Super Duper Graphics" was cancelled due to technical problems and not being able to develop an engine that can run the shader pack even on low end devices like smartphones and tables, the "better together" motto of Mojang shines in there, it was a bumer but okay, if that's their vision of the game i'm okay with it. But then a week latter they announce Minecraft RTX, a feature that breaks those mottos and codes of the company and allows only a certain amount of players (the ones that have an RTX graphics card) to enjoy it. So, bussines and colaborations with external companies allow for the breaking of the mottos and ideals of the company? I didn't understood their reasoning back then.
Luckily the community made a betterrtx mod which improves it in a lot of ways and now I use rtx daily in my survival world. And downloading different packs from third party sources can actually give different looks to the game and features much like shaders on Java. You can choose between Kelly’s rtx to something like defined pbr and it’ll give a different look to the rtx.
Nvidia wanted to promote their RTX stuff, so they bought a demo from Minecraft developers. Now the Ad campaign is over and the developers do not care anymore. What, people bought RTX hoping to play Minecraft with ray tracing? Too bad the developers do not have time to enable RTX for player worlds, even though just TOGGLING it ENABLED is all they have to do
when i bought my rtx card i was hoping to be able to play minecraft with rtx when i got my card, i played minecraft with RTX, because its a feature in the game and you can do it. it is a feature and you CAN toggle it enabled
Honestly, I feel like RTX in general (even beyond Minecraft) was just used as a hype tool to get people on board with paying outlandish prices for GPUs. Most people I know don't even enable RTX when playing games that support it, even the RTX poster child Cyberpunk 2077. It's a technology that nobody asked for, something that was basically forced on us if we wanted to get a new GPU to play new games. I really wish they would release some GPUs that are performance focused without RTX hardware, I hardly ever use it tbh.
I use Minecraft RTX, using the third-party download, and I've found that it works very well. And it's a stunning,, breathtaking Minecraft that puts Optifine to shame! I suppose I could put it through more rigorous tests but for regular play, it works very well!
I want to point out that in my experience Minecraft RTX's performance is very questionable. I first tried it 2 years ago with my 2070 and got consistent 70 fps. The problem is, I recently got a 3090 and my fps is exactly the same! Doesn't matter what settings I use because my GPU usage is very low and it struggles to get more frames. It almost feels like when Mojang made RTX a feature in 2019, they only optimized it for the 20s series and capped their performance so cards that are newer and better have basically the same frame rate. Some people on reddit suggest texture packs with vsync or something like that but it's still sad that Mojang completely forgot about rtx as soon as they released it
That's a "feature" that Microsoft added for rtx. If you cant get high enough fps to match your monitor's refresh rate, it will lock at half to stay consistent. I'm willing to bet you have a 144hz monitor
You can disable VSync in the graphics settings, I believe. If you do that, it won't lock it at a certain framerate anymore. Otherwise, idk, they might have Bedrock locked to one CPU core like Java is.
they just simply abandoned it, like on the super duper graphics pack, on the series X RTX. I guess it's going to be having the same treatment as the Super Duper graphics pack where it will be cancelled next year for the console versions.
I lost my bedrock worlds. I can still access them via preview, but they won’t sync on the main game on Xbox. I’m currently building a pc, so I’ll be moving over to Java, as it’s just the superior version. Bedrock has been a pain in my behind ever since they stopped supporting the legacy editions.
Honestly, I don't even care if RTX doesn't make it into Minecraft. It looks so out of place in a game like that. It's like when they made the water look realistic in half life source. Like it looks good, but the game still looks very polygonal so it just starts to look very jarring. Pluse RTX makes it so that torches just aren't even useful because everything is too dark.
Just as everything mojang related they can't do decent work, nvidia did all the job incorporating Raytracing to the game and mojang just left it like that and abandoned it... such a shame
Im still so freaking pissed at Nvidia for scamming people with that "Minecraft RTX NOW with 20 Series Nvidia cards". I bought a 2080ti with Minecraft RTX as a main selling point. So i got the GPU and the first thing i hated was no Java support. So i bought the win 10 version (before it was free if you had the other). And finally there is the option to enable rtx.... but its grayed out because i have find a 3rd party texturepack or have to "make one myself" -.- When i found the Nvidia showcase maps at first i was impressed. But i really soon noticed something sketchy going on. Colored tone blocks are glowing, nether bricks with mirror texture and every showcase uses wildly different textures for different things. The way i enjoyed playing these showcase maps the most was by burning down the map and start experimenting with the features. The one thing that flattened me the most was the nether brick mirror in the light shadow and reflection showcase (if i remember correctly). The map was also good for experimenting since its built on super flat and in simple squeare rooms. When i saw a single mirror block i was impressed how far back i could see as detailed as in front. I was a little worried about the performance but as i found out by starting to build a mirror maze it has nearly no impact on performance. This is nothing like i have ever seen before. These flawless reflections were kind of gamechanging for me. Even an endless mirror worked flawlessly. Also the mirror maze killed my vision. It was impossible to navigate trough that thing. The reflections go around so many corners and you get lost behind the first one because youre surrounded by exits. Next thing i built was a primitive form of camera starting with a large dark room and removing a single block in the middle of one wall. The light took a few seconds but i immediately saw the upper green half of the picture and the lower blue on the wall opposing the hole. when the game was ready with lighting the preaviously pitch black room i was able to make out some inverted buildings, a tree and a portal i built around 10 blocks from the room. Lighting with RTX has been like that in other games but there has been no place to play and try out such things like in Minecraft. After that i placed some colored glass in place of the hole and experimented with different combinations. I love how it felt to play with dampening the light and fill a room from different angles. Praising these points there is the problem though. If you try to play with these features in a survival game you wont have the smoothest experience. At first there is no option to create a game with the textures trough the game itself. You will have to find the locally saved data from the showcase map yourself, extract the texturepack there and place it in the right folder. It will work but you will have more than just a few blocks looking... out of place. These showcase maps are obviously built around the specific texture packs. Every map shows some different things. There is no overall best texture pack because many use the same blocks for different things. There are just not enough blocks in Minecraft. You would have to add mirrors, colored lights and rework all textures, not just the exciting ones. I hope they are working on a real RTX update finally delivering what has been advertised. The deal was Minecraft with RTX. Not "look at this, now go back to your boring vanilla game". Bring us additional blocks and official vanilla textures. Not Nvidia branded marketing to sell their product. I wont stop complaining about this until they deliver.
What really Pisses me off is that they kind of screwed the community mainly on bedrock as they change to render dragon to allow RTX to work better for the PC that can run it but at the same time they deleted basically every shader that wasn't RTX
My impression is that only NVidia ever really cared in the first place. They wanted to sell people on their new RTX features and so paid companies to implement it. However, it became pretty clear that raytracing wasn't selling the cards (edit: lol can't believe I wrote that. It was a nice feature but this was just a marketing gimmick). They were selling simply because they were there. With no real financial incentive to develop it further, NVidia stopped caring as much, and Mojang went back to their normal updates. Mojang has made some graphical improvements over time but never anything like this. This move was pushed by NVidia. Because they wanted it to look good for marketing reasons, they locked it down so much that only people willing to mod their game would actually get to use it. Modding is a common practice for Java players, not so much Bedrock players. So, the community that would've given the most attention was sort of barred from using it. Furthermore, Java has competing graphic mods. None have quite the same performance, but some almost match the quality. Basically, I think it only existed for marketing purposes and that marketing has died down tremendously and so has the development. Edit: I should state that nowadays, raytracing is a more meaningful feature than it was at the time of this feature being released. However, I doubt the RTX feature made a meaningful difference in the sales of Minecraft, so my point remains the same.
I think the main fail of Minecraft RTX is lack of creator engagement with it. There are little to no RTX packs available for Bedrock and with how they update that version so much, all previously made packs tend to break with a new update, whereas with Java pretty much all shaders are backwards/forward compatible with whatever version.
If they don't want to update Ray tracing they could give better lighting shades and make the textures more crisp as Minecraft can hurt the eyes after a while compared to other games I play.
I never really liked Minecraft with Raytracing. Maybe it's the flat surfaces and large blocks making it look strange, but the reflexions and refractions just constantly make me think "That's not how light works". Also, nitpick: RTX by definition cannot come to consoles because RTX is an Nvidia term, and the consoles use AMD graphics. It's generally just called Raytracing.
It's microsoft. They never keep supporting anything even on the most popular games. It was left in a broken state and never fixed. Very frustrating considering how it was basically done.
RTX is an exclusive technology owned by NVIDIA graphics which is why it didn't go very far, the consoles have AMD Graphics. If Microsoft is working on a Ray-tracing update for the consoles it would a completely separate project.
@@MrBrouilles Oh shoot! You are right, I guess I got confused because of the marketing by NVIDIA. All they seemed to of done was implement DLSS, and of course it works better on their RTX hardware.
@@Toastymuffin Yeah...because Nvidia GPU has independent cores for ray tracing while AMD...I don't know if they have them, probably not because they are probably relying on software while Nvidia relies on both software and hardware.
still wish we got super sdgp. mojang has been promising console players any form of improvement for the terrible bedrock lighting for literally 5 years now
I love RTX in cave systems and for lighting up dark rooms in different colours, but dislike the glossy/plastic look of tiles on the overworld in the sunlight. I hope they'll improve it some day (along with Minecraft's overall performance), as at it's best it's really quite amazing.
Funnily enough, the ONLY instance of ray tracing implementations that ever excited me was minecraft's. It's the ultimate shader pack, literally unbeatable, and corporate greed killed it in the kennel. :/
This video compactly ignores all the "Won't fix" bug reports for Bedrock related to RTX, the fact that all the devs who worked on Minecraft RTX have left the company and the fact that it was just a marketing stunt and nothing more
you would be better off selling your console and buying a decent gaming pc to play java edition with shader since they probably stopped the development of rtx on minecraft bedrock edition and i highly doubt that current gen consoles can run rtx
@@Rhombus-inc im sure current gen consoles can handle Minecraft RTX, its just a matter of Mojang deciding to actually invest time and resources into a proper RTX implementation.
Needed to be said… feature feels dead, I’d pay a good chunk of change for an official RTX pack in the marketplace, especially because most of the 3rd party ones seem to break for me
I just returned to Minecraft after a couple of years away, and I was excited to try out the RTX function, but despite there being a button with the right label it doesn't highlight UNLESS you use one of the world packs from the marketplace. Further investigation led to the realization that RTX is a kind of stagnant dead end at this point. And I'm not about to mess around with 3rd party downloads. Still loving being back into the game though.
You can actually use RTX in any world and server, you just need to move the RTX world texture packs into your texture pack folder. The problem with RTX is that when you have a world with a lot of stuff or even the RTX worlds themselves the game crashed while trying to join.. and I have a pretty beefy computer.
Nice video, but please put a compressor on your voice in the post-production. These sudden jumps in volume make it really uncomfortable to listen to your vid.
honestly, ray tracing should be subtle, you shouldn't need textures to suddenly be shiny in order to make it worth while but players would barely notice it without everything being shiny. ray tracing needs another 10 years for it to be used properly as a dev tool instead of a graphics setting
Hey point of advice, you may wanna keep an eye on your voice volume and edit it accordingly. There were several points where I had to raise my volume to hear you just to then have you lean into the mic (or whatever happened) and get blasted.
mojang doesn't care anymore. they updated the game on october 5th they made an update to xbox called “performance update”. the game now runs worse than ever. mad input delay, corrupted worlds (very common), huge deadzones on controller, locked 60fps (previously unlockable), all text boxes in the game are bugged (chat, signs, anvils, etc), and other things the worst part is that they're not going to fix it. the reason for all this was that they changed the game from uwp to gdk making the files inaccessible. this is so that we can't download addons and texture packs in order to get us to use the marketplace. i think they won't fix it because they can't. at least not without reverting it to uwp
I was able to get RTX to work on a survival world without third party sites by extracting one of the compatible resource packs from one of the official worlds and adding it to my global resources. Worked like a charm.
The low frame rate on consoles is to be expected, since the Xbox Series X and PS5 isn't using Nvidia's GPUs, they are instead using RDNA 2, which has atrocious raytracing performance, and even for games that aren't path traced like Minecraft RTX, the consoles still can't really go above 30FPS, and 40fps with ray tracing for the leaked console version of Minecraft is already better than I expected in terms of performance. There is a lot of bugs with Minecraft RTX that just doesn't seems to be addressed at all by Mojang right now, and the main reason why is probably because most gamers play on mobile, and they seem to be focusing on bringing RTX to consoles right now instead of addressing the immediate bugs that Minecraft RTX have on PC. The Mojang team that works on bedrock just doesn't seem to be as well-oiled as the team that works on java.
I’m not too bothered now about this. I’ve waiting so long for this. It’s just not gonna happen. I got a realistic texture pack on Xbox so I’m happy with that. Plus got a PC what runs ultra realistic graphics.
The graphics, and the quality keeps rising, and then there's my paycheck which stays the same. The Steam Deck is the only thing that let me experience mid/high tier gaming, cause I could actually afford it.
Im having a hard time understanding why you can use an ENB no problem on PC, but puting in similar effect on console is next to impossible. I get RTX is diffeent from an ENB, but still...
RTX seems pretty thrown under the bus. DLSS isn't kept updated, but more importantly, they never added FSR 2 nor XeSS, so AMD and Intel Arc users are left with suboptimal RT performance...
I'm so disappointed in Minecraft. ;~; I'm so disappointed in the game I grew up with, and I hate that. I'm not excited for its future anymore. I had big hopes when Microsoft acquired the IP, because I thought Minecraft deserved more talent and resources behind it. Slowly but surely, though, Microsoft has managed to thoroughly prove that they care only about the money they can milk from the IP. It's soul-crushing to hear the adorable devs talk about their dreams, their vision, their excitement for the game's future, but it's clear from the outside that Microsoft is selling them empty promises, that Microsoft will keep the carrot dangling in front of them until the cash cow collapses. Think about it. If Microsoft has a 2+ billion dollar IP on their hands, why isn't the project as well-equipped as some INDIE teams are, let alone AAA studios? Don't tell me it's because a smaller studio works better. It only does if you don't know how to manage a big studio or aren't given the resources--Microsoft knows how to manage a big studio AND they have the resources. Why couldn't you have RTX AND the Super-Duper Graphics Pack? Why hasn't Bedrock reached feature parity with Java, so that Java can be retired? Why isn't there an official modding API--other than barebones JavaScript API on Bedrock, which conveniently has only enough functionality to make products for the marketplace? Why do we even NEED Forge, Fabric, or Quilt, if Microsoft cares about the community? Why does MC Java perform so poorly that a SINGLE, UNPAID COMMUNITY MEMBER felt compelled to REWRITE the entire rendering engine (see Sodium)? How is it that it takes a YEAR for the entire Minecraft studio to produce what a tiny modding team can make in their free time? I can't wait for Hytale to come out. Hytale has had its own development woes, but I respect their reasons more than Microsoft's. Hytale doesn't have one of the biggest, most powerful companies behind it, so they weren't equipped to handle lockdown, plus they decided to rewrite Hytale in C++ instead of Java (which I respect, don't get me wrong). Yes, I know the people managing the team for Minecraft don't really have the power to change this, let alone the (probably overworked) devs. I'm a dev on a team managing the cloud for a Fortune 50 company which has a close relationship with Microsoft, so I know how these organizations work. But you know? The Minecraft team DESERVES more of Microsoft's money and resources. Whatever excuse they give you for why things are the way they are with Minecraft... it's a lie. A lie the devs themselves are often encouraged to believe. Minecraft desperately needs competition. Microsoft desperately needs competition. I'm so sad to see the game I loved as a kid being thoroughly milked and taken for granted. Sure, the spin-offs are fantastically made and fun. But they're spin-offs. They're not Minecraft. Maybe I'm just at that age now where I get bitter about things. I don't know. I give up waiting to be proven wrong.
I have a single shader and a 3D texture pack that basically make it look like the super duper graphics would have, I don't know why Mojang struggled so much
super duper graphics had nothing to so with ray tracing except the imitation of sun rays, or "godrays", or "volumetric lighting" which is not ray tracing
Hopefully they take advantage of FSR 2.0 it’s a godsend of a tech especially for the longevity of consoles now that they support it and it could definitely help alleviate performance if that’s an issue.
I really really love Minecraft RTX, even 4 years later I am truly amazed by the graphics! I really wish they released first party RTX graphics packs, the third party packs don't feel official. They made RTX worse over the updates. In Minecraft RTX Beta 1.15 your hand would stay visible when you enter water. In all the new versions like 1.21 your hand goes invisible when it enters the water while your head is above the water. I also want the player to have a shadow no matter if you are in third person or first person. This is all I want them to fix, it's not hard to do right? They haven't looked at RTX anymore since it's release and slowly bugs begin appearing that don't get fixed because seemingly all the people that know how RTX works left or something.
The Super duper graphics pack was not ray traced. That wouldn't of been that great back in 2017 and would have performed badly on PS4 and Xbox One. Although one thing I will say, Minecraft RTX has a ton of potential that is being ignored such as proper parallax occlusion mapping, alternative sun angle, waves in the water based on the size of the body of water, wet surfaces when exposed to rain, and other smaller features. Minecraft Java truly shows what it could look like but Mojang just doing small bug fixes really shows how little they seem to care. Surely they could have a small team dedicated to it
I’ve been using RTX for about 2 years on my personal worlds via 3rd party packs, and it’s been great when it works. For a few months in 2021 it just didn’t work at all, and until recently it was extremely buggy and unreliable for me. At least they seem to care enough fix it occasionally. Mojang is extremely lazy, so it’s not surprising to me RTX has barely been touched since release. It’s a shame because it’s way better than any shader pack on Java, and it’s the ONLY reason I tolerate and use bedrock edition primarily.
bruh did you just act like they would make all of minecraft raytraced they have it on mobile and console that both becides the new gen consoles and a few phones could run
Guys you can still do rtx in fact you can do them quite easily just switch to java and you can get countless varieties of rtx shaders that are consistently updated.
I haven't touched Minecraft in two years without raytracing, it feels like an inferior product with it off and it genuinely affects how I build for the better because I take light into account. Only time it's off is when I feel like using one of my many random texture packs for a change but that's rare
Minecraft RTX was my reason to upgrade my PC, and is currently the only way I play mc anymore. Better lighting makes the game feel so much more immersive and beautiful, while retaining the classic vanilla look. And without the need to completely transform the game with shaders to something totally different.
The Super Duper graphics pack wasn't a raytracing pack, it was shaders and enhanced textures that was meant for the Xbox One X which doesn't have any raytracing capability.
TBH I think minecraft with a solid shader pack like BSL looks even better than minecraft RTX, and at the same time is considerably less demanding to run
It will simply never make sense to me why Mojang hasn't improved the graphics of Minecraft officially, Shaders run like butter and are crazy stable, they look absolutely phenomenal and do nothing but drastically improve the experience from sunset to sunrise yet just never did it.
The unofficial RTX texture pack you can play in every world is great and all but there are some limitations as in your render distance is capped to 24 and its still quite buggy in terms of broken light rays.
A new video yayy. Technically my first regular video of this year. I know I did a video with my girlfriend and did 2 shorts.
What do you think about Minecraft RTX? Let me know here. Or join the discord to continue the discussion: discord.gg/SS2TCZPcSa
One word… mobile :3
Imagine not activating Windows
You didn't activate your window? lmao
well contact me for free activation i guess. (For real i will activate your window if you want)
I use RTX in my survival world, and it still is kinda buggy. I wish they worked on it more, since it’s a really nice feature
For me RTX is not buggy at all, though my AMD graphics card is not the best so to remove input delay when using RTX I have to lower my screen resolution from 1440p to 1080p, and if I am using mods then I have to lower it to 720p, but even with 1440p I still get a consistent 144 fps, and I am using an rtx pack WITH heightmaps and fogs. (It is the vanilla RTX texture pack from mcpedl. )
buggy how? RTX is what has me wanting to buy a PC for the first time in a decade, but if its borderline unplayable i may have to reconsider. thx
@@Kakerate2 BRUH IT IS NOT UNPLAYABLE his RTX is only unplayable because he has a bad graphics card, my graphics card is not very good either but as long as you have a really good graphics card then it will run PERFECTLY mine is an AMD graphics card but i would recomend u get a nvidia graphics card so u can also use upscaling which makes the performance MUCH better
@@8crafter yeah RTX was pretty much designed with nvidia cards in mind so it would make sense that it doesnt work right on AMD cards. Its a shame that ML and RTX is exclusive to nvidia atm.
@@Kakerate2 It might be my hardware or the resource pack I'm using, but on occasion when loading up a world, some textures won't load and I sometimes come across a random chunk that doesn't render water properly. It might be my CPU bottlenecking, but the graphics still look amazing. It's totally playable, just some minor visual bugs. I'm also using Bedrock's RTX from NVidia with the Defined PBR resource pack.
I was upset about Super Duper Graphics being canceled, but RTX looked absolutely beautiful and made me really want an RTX graphics card to try it out for myself. I was pretty disappointed when I did try it, especially when I found out you could only use the really good RTX shaders on pre-made worlds.
There are really good rtx packs out there man
@@danzjz3923 not for bedrock
@@Paiskii Yes there are.
@@Paiskii defined pbr, realsource RTX, Vanilla RTX, just to name a few.
you can use them on any world if you have them as a resource pack
It's like they don't even care😭
Sadly...
Probably because enabling rtx doesnt make them money
@@saltylightning7992 but you need an rtx card to use it so wouldn’t that be the opposite??? Like “If you want to play this feature buy our rtx cards!”
sadly yes minecraft is just a game that we play for a weak and then get bored and comeback after 2 months
Same with the Super Duper graphic Pack 💔😭
How it feels to be a valve game fan
It feels good.
@@flofdev You mean the engine update for a 11 old game, with barely any significant changes made? whoo, feels great
still no tf2 update valve sucks
@@kiwaminski but still good games tho
@@ДмитрийПротопопов-ы6ц they said an update is coming this summer ???? what are you talking about
Shaders for modern consoles would literally boost the life of the game to another level for console players
mojang making big promises at official show events to hype people up and then making excuses to not deliver on any of them, what else is new
So false advertisement 🤑
They constantly do this and have done so for years but the community has failed to punish them so they have continued to get away with it. It's soooo infuriating, I genuinely have grown to despise them so much over the years.
There hasn't been an original addition to Minecraft since 1.2 lol
It is what it is.
Id say more like microsoft
@@YourMomsAltAccount nah you should see the comments when any new update comes out, its like 70% negative ever since caves and cliffs and rightfully so
Yeah, I imagined this would be like a built-in feature you could enable as a graphical setting for any world. The fact that it not only has to be downloaded from elsewhere and can only be used in pre-made marketplace worlds makes it really just a tech demo. This was released years ago and has never been fully implemented into the base game.
this is false. You can download plenty of rtx packs for use in bedrock. I use one on my bedrock realm with plenty of addons
you can use it on any map i play with rtx on my friends realm
Same here, I just downloaded a resource pack that looks exactly like vanilla textures but has rtx on
It’s more infuriating that the option is on consoles but it’s greyed out.
It makes me wonder what the point of putting the toggle on there is even for.
I don't think consoles can do raytracing, but Nvidia made the RTX demo as a showcase for the tensor cores, which aren't on consoles
I’m so glad someone’s talking about this. Ever since I built my PC a few months ago with an RTX graphics card, I was wondering what the heck happened.
Its absurd when you look at Nvidias social media advertising Minecraft RTX every now and then. I wonder how many people bought RTX cards for Minecraft like i did.
I'm so glad I didn't fall for Nvidias RTX-crap, I used a 1080 which could run Minecraft with Shaders.
Not Raytracing, but dayum they looked almost as fancy and didn't suck up all the performance.
@@winni2701 I didn’t fall for their crap, I looked at bench marks of games I want to play and saw Nvidia had the best price to performance in my budget.
@@showbizcec4985 Well I hope you got enough VRAM for future UE5 games
@@winni2701 I don’t have enough 💀I’ll admit, that was definitely a downside. I don’t regret it though cause I don’t play many newer games or plan to except for GTA 6 when ever that comes out which probably won’t be for years. Then, I’ll upgrade. At the time I bought my card, I still wouldn’t have gotten anything else and am still happy with my choice given what I use my PC for tbh.
I’ve tried different rtx packs on my survival world, the biggest issue is light is very “hard” - when I dig a cave only direct light lights up walls, which is unrealistic because light should bounce from all but most black surfaces.
It makes it very hard mining for anything or exploring caves(
Also many devs ad glossy mirror like effect to too many blocks - earth, grass, stones - those should not be mirrors
It's not unrealistic. The lighting is acting how it does in real life
You have to make sure as well you have the most up-to-date pack or one that's made correctly or else everything will be reflective. If the is made correctly those things you mentioned that I reflective should not be
use kelly's rtx
@@crestofhonor2349 ray-traicing part is realistic, but not fully.
Light is being reflect from pretty much every surface, and even air particles dissipate it so if there's light around the corner you will get some light as well (not alot of course).
@@staticwarrior will give it a try, thx
October 2023 update: Shaders are confirmed for consoles! In the latest Minecraft preview on Xbox Series S/X, PC, and Android you can turn on an experimental render dragon feature that allows you to turn on a new video setting called Deferred Technical Preview, this allows you play Minecraft with PBR(Physically Based Rendering) - Enabled packs, Its not exactly ray-tracing but it comes super close and it looks amazing and it still has the lighting features and block details that look beautiful. Currently you're gonna have to download a PBR - Enabled pack and there is no official mojang PBR pack but more and more PBR packs are being added everyday online and some of them are really good and its less buggy than RTX believe it or not!
When I tried out RTX Minecraft a few months ago on the provided marketplace maps I found it was either buggy or completely broken at times with issues with lighting, particularly glitched chunks with the RTX lighting. It seemed like it had been abandoned. I would love to see it come to Java Edition, at least support for the hardware on AMD, Nvidia and Intel GPU and Im sure it would be made use of by shaders.
Just use a 3rd party rtx pack for Minecraft bedrock from mcpedl or some other online source (my recommendation is the Vanilla RTX texture pack from mcpedl as it works great for me on my AMD graphics card (if ur graphics card is not very good use the vanilla RTX normals subpack instead (it is on the same mcpedl page as the other one))
@@8crafter Thanks for the recommendation, ill keep that in mind for Bedrock. Mainly play Java edition where I use 3rd party shaders anyway.
@@jensenambrose3333 ever try SEUS hrr3?
@@danzjz3923 Yes, iv tried it and got somewhere around 50 FPS at the time. Might be bit higher now as I change my CPU since then but I wouldn't expect more than a few extra frames or better frame time consistency. Discovered the games base performance had improved around 2* from testing between 1.18 and 1.19. Found Optifine to degredate performance in 1.19. I used the same world for testing and same area of the map. It was quite pretty.
Edit: I have not tried the HRR version but the full resolution, I will have to give it a try at some point.
On java there are rtx shaders being developped on latest versions
The reason it hasn't been updated and they don't care is because if a Minecraft Dev tries to work for more than 30 minutes a day they'll die instantly
Lmao
The reason why you can't use the pack for another world in theory is because of copyright and encryption... In practice, this makes the system heavy, messy, and poses a high security risk. -> lose money, sue, etc
In a word: profits and moneys.
Well it is called "RTX". They need make a ray tracing pack that works with Radeon and Intel Arc too not just RTX cards.
You can get RTX Packs from MCPEDL, and the popular ones are Kelly's RTX, Defined PBR, RealSource RTX, Lumen RTX, Vanilla RTX these are all created by the Community
The packs in premade world are not encrypted you can just simply copy it
so in other words.. Nvidia are being dicks about it. i dont see any legitimate reason not to just make the shaders part of the game and let you use them anywhere
Average Nvidia decision
The problem here, is that Mojang and nVidia have dropped the ball in PR for this, and this was largely Microsoft and nVidia's baby to begin with. In reality, It's out of beta, still receiving updates and working fine. I've been playing it for weeks. You do NOT need an official world or their texture packs -- if you know what you are doing. The documentation on how the RTX texture pack formats work are out there if you search for them. With a little patience and know-how, the high-res PBR textures released for Java versions using shaders CAN be adapted to and work well as RTX packs. No additional modding (e.g., Optifine, etc) is required.
What's not happening is new official content releases talking about it, or texture packs which have kept up with the changes to the RTX texture format. Granted, I've been tweaking the custom fustercluck of a texturepack that I use myself as the changes occur, so I've not had to care about whether or not new packs are released by some publisher or not. That being said, I am not the average end-user of Minecraft either.
Super Duper Graphics Pack was not at all raytraced. "high end graphics" does not equal raytracing. Raytracing (in simple non-technical terms) specifically means the computer simulates light bouncing per pixel from shooting "rays" from the camera to detect where light bounces at.
What drives me crazy about Mojang/Microsoft is the hypocrisy they have inside their development management. As i remember "Super Duper Graphics" was cancelled due to technical problems and not being able to develop an engine that can run the shader pack even on low end devices like smartphones and tables, the "better together" motto of Mojang shines in there, it was a bumer but okay, if that's their vision of the game i'm okay with it. But then a week latter they announce Minecraft RTX, a feature that breaks those mottos and codes of the company and allows only a certain amount of players (the ones that have an RTX graphics card) to enjoy it.
So, bussines and colaborations with external companies allow for the breaking of the mottos and ideals of the company? I didn't understood their reasoning back then.
Luckily the community made a betterrtx mod which improves it in a lot of ways and now I use rtx daily in my survival world. And downloading different packs from third party sources can actually give different looks to the game and features much like shaders on Java. You can choose between Kelly’s rtx to something like defined pbr and it’ll give a different look to the rtx.
Nvidia wanted to promote their RTX stuff, so they bought a demo from Minecraft developers. Now the Ad campaign is over and the developers do not care anymore. What, people bought RTX hoping to play Minecraft with ray tracing? Too bad the developers do not have time to enable RTX for player worlds, even though just TOGGLING it ENABLED is all they have to do
when i bought my rtx card i was hoping to be able to play minecraft with rtx
when i got my card, i played minecraft with RTX, because its a feature in the game and you can do it. it is a feature and you CAN toggle it enabled
Honestly, I feel like RTX in general (even beyond Minecraft) was just used as a hype tool to get people on board with paying outlandish prices for GPUs. Most people I know don't even enable RTX when playing games that support it, even the RTX poster child Cyberpunk 2077. It's a technology that nobody asked for, something that was basically forced on us if we wanted to get a new GPU to play new games. I really wish they would release some GPUs that are performance focused without RTX hardware, I hardly ever use it tbh.
This is pretty much Mojang's own fault. They're notorious for adding very little to Minecraft that it is literally a meme now.
Man I want more people to see this video, more people need to talk about the abandonment of Minecraft RTX
Microsoft really need to make RTX available in vanilla.
I use Minecraft RTX, using the third-party download, and I've found that it works very well. And it's a stunning,, breathtaking Minecraft that puts Optifine to shame! I suppose I could put it through more rigorous tests but for regular play, it works very well!
I want to point out that in my experience Minecraft RTX's performance is very questionable. I first tried it 2 years ago with my 2070 and got consistent 70 fps. The problem is, I recently got a 3090 and my fps is exactly the same! Doesn't matter what settings I use because my GPU usage is very low and it struggles to get more frames.
It almost feels like when Mojang made RTX a feature in 2019, they only optimized it for the 20s series and capped their performance so cards that are newer and better have basically the same frame rate. Some people on reddit suggest texture packs with vsync or something like that but it's still sad that Mojang completely forgot about rtx as soon as they released it
That's a "feature" that Microsoft added for rtx. If you cant get high enough fps to match your monitor's refresh rate, it will lock at half to stay consistent. I'm willing to bet you have a 144hz monitor
I’ve seen 165 on my laptop 3070 ti… odd.
You can disable VSync in the graphics settings, I believe. If you do that, it won't lock it at a certain framerate anymore. Otherwise, idk, they might have Bedrock locked to one CPU core like Java is.
they just simply abandoned it, like on the super duper graphics pack, on the series X RTX. I guess it's going to be having the same treatment as the Super Duper graphics pack where it will be cancelled next year for the console versions.
Then for the Xbox Series X Pro they'll re-announce RTX shortly before the console is released for sale, and a year after that they'll cancel RTX.
@@glowerworm yeah. We know the drill where console shaders will just be cancelled altogether
I lost my bedrock worlds. I can still access them via preview, but they won’t sync on the main game on Xbox.
I’m currently building a pc, so I’ll be moving over to Java, as it’s just the superior version. Bedrock has been a pain in my behind ever since they stopped supporting the legacy editions.
what spec you building?
Honestly, I don't even care if RTX doesn't make it into Minecraft. It looks so out of place in a game like that.
It's like when they made the water look realistic in half life source. Like it looks good, but the game still looks very polygonal so it just starts to look very jarring.
Pluse RTX makes it so that torches just aren't even useful because everything is too dark.
Just as everything mojang related they can't do decent work, nvidia did all the job incorporating Raytracing to the game and mojang just left it like that and abandoned it... such a shame
Im still so freaking pissed at Nvidia for scamming people with that "Minecraft RTX NOW with 20 Series Nvidia cards".
I bought a 2080ti with Minecraft RTX as a main selling point. So i got the GPU and the first thing i hated was no Java support. So i bought the win 10 version (before it was free if you had the other). And finally there is the option to enable rtx.... but its grayed out because i have find a 3rd party texturepack or have to "make one myself" -.-
When i found the Nvidia showcase maps at first i was impressed. But i really soon noticed something sketchy going on. Colored tone blocks are glowing, nether bricks with mirror texture and every showcase uses wildly different textures for different things. The way i enjoyed playing these showcase maps the most was by burning down the map and start experimenting with the features.
The one thing that flattened me the most was the nether brick mirror in the light shadow and reflection showcase (if i remember correctly). The map was also good for experimenting since its built on super flat and in simple squeare rooms. When i saw a single mirror block i was impressed how far back i could see as detailed as in front. I was a little worried about the performance but as i found out by starting to build a mirror maze it has nearly no impact on performance. This is nothing like i have ever seen before. These flawless reflections were kind of gamechanging for me. Even an endless mirror worked flawlessly. Also the mirror maze killed my vision. It was impossible to navigate trough that thing. The reflections go around so many corners and you get lost behind the first one because youre surrounded by exits.
Next thing i built was a primitive form of camera starting with a large dark room and removing a single block in the middle of one wall. The light took a few seconds but i immediately saw the upper green half of the picture and the lower blue on the wall opposing the hole. when the game was ready with lighting the preaviously pitch black room i was able to make out some inverted buildings, a tree and a portal i built around 10 blocks from the room. Lighting with RTX has been like that in other games but there has been no place to play and try out such things like in Minecraft.
After that i placed some colored glass in place of the hole and experimented with different combinations. I love how it felt to play with dampening the light and fill a room from different angles.
Praising these points there is the problem though. If you try to play with these features in a survival game you wont have the smoothest experience. At first there is no option to create a game with the textures trough the game itself. You will have to find the locally saved data from the showcase map yourself, extract the texturepack there and place it in the right folder. It will work but you will have more than just a few blocks looking... out of place. These showcase maps are obviously built around the specific texture packs. Every map shows some different things. There is no overall best texture pack because many use the same blocks for different things. There are just not enough blocks in Minecraft. You would have to add mirrors, colored lights and rework all textures, not just the exciting ones.
I hope they are working on a real RTX update finally delivering what has been advertised. The deal was Minecraft with RTX. Not "look at this, now go back to your boring vanilla game". Bring us additional blocks and official vanilla textures. Not Nvidia branded marketing to sell their product. I wont stop complaining about this until they deliver.
It got attention because of Nvidia making a big deal about RTX and then having to scale back because of overhype underpromise.
I'm glad you made this video. It seems like it's become a forgotten feature that was suppose to come, but never did.
it did
i hope to see ray tracing one day because i can’t stand minecrafts normal lighting
use shaders problem solved
@@oneplay5570 bedrock can't run shaders and I think they might be on bedrock
@@oneplay5570 man learns Console players can’t use shaders
@@Zero-vu8se ah i see
@@ImNervv right my bad
i've been playing minecraft rtx and i love it. it gets super dark at night time so it's a little scary i wish i had friends :(
@enrique amaya 🤡
What really Pisses me off is that they kind of screwed the community mainly on bedrock as they change to render dragon to allow RTX to work better for the PC that can run it but at the same time they deleted basically every shader that wasn't RTX
this video is 5 minutes long without the sponsor
My impression is that only NVidia ever really cared in the first place. They wanted to sell people on their new RTX features and so paid companies to implement it. However, it became pretty clear that raytracing wasn't selling the cards (edit: lol can't believe I wrote that. It was a nice feature but this was just a marketing gimmick). They were selling simply because they were there.
With no real financial incentive to develop it further, NVidia stopped caring as much, and Mojang went back to their normal updates. Mojang has made some graphical improvements over time but never anything like this. This move was pushed by NVidia.
Because they wanted it to look good for marketing reasons, they locked it down so much that only people willing to mod their game would actually get to use it. Modding is a common practice for Java players, not so much Bedrock players. So, the community that would've given the most attention was sort of barred from using it. Furthermore, Java has competing graphic mods. None have quite the same performance, but some almost match the quality.
Basically, I think it only existed for marketing purposes and that marketing has died down tremendously and so has the development.
Edit: I should state that nowadays, raytracing is a more meaningful feature than it was at the time of this feature being released. However, I doubt the RTX feature made a meaningful difference in the sales of Minecraft, so my point remains the same.
I think the main fail of Minecraft RTX is lack of creator engagement with it. There are little to no RTX packs available for Bedrock and with how they update that version so much, all previously made packs tend to break with a new update, whereas with Java pretty much all shaders are backwards/forward compatible with whatever version.
people are developing rtx packs for minecraft are you okay????
If they don't want to update Ray tracing they could give better lighting shades and make the textures more crisp as Minecraft can hurt the eyes after a while compared to other games I play.
I never really liked Minecraft with Raytracing. Maybe it's the flat surfaces and large blocks making it look strange, but the reflexions and refractions just constantly make me think "That's not how light works".
Also, nitpick: RTX by definition cannot come to consoles because RTX is an Nvidia term, and the consoles use AMD graphics. It's generally just called Raytracing.
It's microsoft. They never keep supporting anything even on the most popular games. It was left in a broken state and never fixed. Very frustrating considering how it was basically done.
I don’t care for RTX since Java Edition has shaders that look better without the need for an RTX card
The dryer in the background 💀
Come on, Microsoft and Mojang…
RTX is an exclusive technology owned by NVIDIA graphics which is why it didn't go very far, the consoles have AMD Graphics. If Microsoft is working on a Ray-tracing update for the consoles it would a completely separate project.
False. Minecraft RTX is based on DirectX 12 DXR. DXR is a standard. It work on AMD, Intel Arc or Nvidia without problem.
@@MrBrouilles Oh shoot! You are right, I guess I got confused because of the marketing by NVIDIA. All they seemed to of done was implement DLSS, and of course it works better on their RTX hardware.
@@Toastymuffin that's because Nvidia has a personal stake in making rtx work (they own GeForce RTX brand which relies on ray tracing performance)
@@Toastymuffin Yeah...because Nvidia GPU has independent cores for ray tracing while AMD...I don't know if they have them, probably not because they are probably relying on software while Nvidia relies on both software and hardware.
@@CasualG-mer They do starting with the RX 6000 series, but they are just far behind NVIDIA on performance for Ray Tracing.
still wish we got super sdgp. mojang has been promising console players any form of improvement for the terrible bedrock lighting for literally 5 years now
I love RTX in cave systems and for lighting up dark rooms in different colours, but dislike the glossy/plastic look of tiles on the overworld in the sunlight. I hope they'll improve it some day (along with Minecraft's overall performance), as at it's best it's really quite amazing.
Funnily enough, the ONLY instance of ray tracing implementations that ever excited me was minecraft's. It's the ultimate shader pack, literally unbeatable, and corporate greed killed it in the kennel. :/
0:13 you need to exit and renter that world, then everything wont be incredibly reflective
This video compactly ignores all the "Won't fix" bug reports for Bedrock related to RTX, the fact that all the devs who worked on Minecraft RTX have left the company and the fact that it was just a marketing stunt and nothing more
All I want is RTX on current gen consoles with decent chunks render distance and 60fps. My friends and I are ALL dying to open up an RTX realm
you would be better off selling your console and buying a decent gaming pc to play java edition with shader since they probably stopped the development of rtx on minecraft bedrock edition and i highly doubt that current gen consoles can run rtx
@@Rhombus-inc im sure current gen consoles can handle Minecraft RTX, its just a matter of Mojang deciding to actually invest time and resources into a proper RTX implementation.
Needed to be said… feature feels dead, I’d pay a good chunk of change for an official RTX pack in the marketplace, especially because most of the 3rd party ones seem to break for me
I just returned to Minecraft after a couple of years away, and I was excited to try out the RTX function, but despite there being a button with the right label it doesn't highlight UNLESS you use one of the world packs from the marketplace. Further investigation led to the realization that RTX is a kind of stagnant dead end at this point. And I'm not about to mess around with 3rd party downloads. Still loving being back into the game though.
You can actually use RTX in any world and server, you just need to move the RTX world texture packs into your texture pack folder. The problem with RTX is that when you have a world with a lot of stuff or even the RTX worlds themselves the game crashed while trying to join.. and I have a pretty beefy computer.
2019 being 4 years ago is crazy to me. That legitimately confused me for a second.
I just want rtx on my main world 😭
U can get it in ur main world
@@Wusyaname_ im on console thats why I can't 😅
Same💀
Nice video, but please put a compressor on your voice in the post-production. These sudden jumps in volume make it really uncomfortable to listen to your vid.
They gonna continue building on to a game, for a console they dont even make anymore. Just give us the next gen update already
it doesnt exist yet because all rtx does is making everything look wet.. i dont want my wooden planks to be reflecting the sky man :(
honestly, ray tracing should be subtle, you shouldn't need textures to suddenly be shiny in order to make it worth while but players would barely notice it without everything being shiny. ray tracing needs another 10 years for it to be used properly as a dev tool instead of a graphics setting
Hey point of advice, you may wanna keep an eye on your voice volume and edit it accordingly. There were several points where I had to raise my volume to hear you just to then have you lean into the mic (or whatever happened) and get blasted.
He's mumbling too at times, which is pretty annoying. Tbf, then there's guys with half a million subs who still have bad audio, it is what it is.
@@sourcedasher Very true, just a shame cause I was enjoying the content otherwise
They realized that modders can make a better shader pack than them and they gave up...
Are you doing your laundry in the back dude?
mojang doesn't care anymore. they updated the game on october 5th they made an update to xbox called “performance update”. the game now runs worse than ever. mad input delay, corrupted worlds (very common), huge deadzones on controller, locked 60fps (previously unlockable), all text boxes in the game are bugged (chat, signs, anvils, etc), and other things
the worst part is that they're not going to fix it. the reason for all this was that they changed the game from uwp to gdk making the files inaccessible. this is so that we can't download addons and texture packs in order to get us to use the marketplace.
i think they won't fix it because they can't. at least not without reverting it to uwp
I was able to get RTX to work on a survival world without third party sites by extracting one of the compatible resource packs from one of the official worlds and adding it to my global resources. Worked like a charm.
HOW?!
@@AngelHurtado-ez1wx I did it a while ago, I don't remember
The low frame rate on consoles is to be expected, since the Xbox Series X and PS5 isn't using Nvidia's GPUs, they are instead using RDNA 2, which has atrocious raytracing performance, and even for games that aren't path traced like Minecraft RTX, the consoles still can't really go above 30FPS, and 40fps with ray tracing for the leaked console version of Minecraft is already better than I expected in terms of performance. There is a lot of bugs with Minecraft RTX that just doesn't seems to be addressed at all by Mojang right now, and the main reason why is probably because most gamers play on mobile, and they seem to be focusing on bringing RTX to consoles right now instead of addressing the immediate bugs that Minecraft RTX have on PC. The Mojang team that works on bedrock just doesn't seem to be as well-oiled as the team that works on java.
I’m not too bothered now about this. I’ve waiting so long for this. It’s just not gonna happen.
I got a realistic texture pack on Xbox so I’m happy with that. Plus got a PC what runs ultra realistic graphics.
The graphics, and the quality keeps rising, and then there's my paycheck which stays the same.
The Steam Deck is the only thing that let me experience mid/high tier gaming, cause I could actually afford it.
Would have made a great addition and showcase for series x, something they desperately need at the moment! Fingers crossed it still happens
I enjoyed listening to your drying machine in the background
Im having a hard time understanding why you can use an ENB no problem on PC, but puting in similar effect on console is next to impossible. I get RTX is diffeent from an ENB, but still...
sadly it’s possible that gta 6 will come out before rtx on console… that’s sad. i’ve been waiting for years
RTX seems pretty thrown under the bus. DLSS isn't kept updated, but more importantly, they never added FSR 2 nor XeSS, so AMD and Intel Arc users are left with suboptimal RT performance...
I'm so disappointed in Minecraft. ;~; I'm so disappointed in the game I grew up with, and I hate that. I'm not excited for its future anymore. I had big hopes when Microsoft acquired the IP, because I thought Minecraft deserved more talent and resources behind it. Slowly but surely, though, Microsoft has managed to thoroughly prove that they care only about the money they can milk from the IP. It's soul-crushing to hear the adorable devs talk about their dreams, their vision, their excitement for the game's future, but it's clear from the outside that Microsoft is selling them empty promises, that Microsoft will keep the carrot dangling in front of them until the cash cow collapses.
Think about it. If Microsoft has a 2+ billion dollar IP on their hands, why isn't the project as well-equipped as some INDIE teams are, let alone AAA studios? Don't tell me it's because a smaller studio works better. It only does if you don't know how to manage a big studio or aren't given the resources--Microsoft knows how to manage a big studio AND they have the resources. Why couldn't you have RTX AND the Super-Duper Graphics Pack? Why hasn't Bedrock reached feature parity with Java, so that Java can be retired? Why isn't there an official modding API--other than barebones JavaScript API on Bedrock, which conveniently has only enough functionality to make products for the marketplace? Why do we even NEED Forge, Fabric, or Quilt, if Microsoft cares about the community? Why does MC Java perform so poorly that a SINGLE, UNPAID COMMUNITY MEMBER felt compelled to REWRITE the entire rendering engine (see Sodium)? How is it that it takes a YEAR for the entire Minecraft studio to produce what a tiny modding team can make in their free time?
I can't wait for Hytale to come out. Hytale has had its own development woes, but I respect their reasons more than Microsoft's. Hytale doesn't have one of the biggest, most powerful companies behind it, so they weren't equipped to handle lockdown, plus they decided to rewrite Hytale in C++ instead of Java (which I respect, don't get me wrong). Yes, I know the people managing the team for Minecraft don't really have the power to change this, let alone the (probably overworked) devs. I'm a dev on a team managing the cloud for a Fortune 50 company which has a close relationship with Microsoft, so I know how these organizations work. But you know? The Minecraft team DESERVES more of Microsoft's money and resources. Whatever excuse they give you for why things are the way they are with Minecraft... it's a lie. A lie the devs themselves are often encouraged to believe.
Minecraft desperately needs competition. Microsoft desperately needs competition. I'm so sad to see the game I loved as a kid being thoroughly milked and taken for granted. Sure, the spin-offs are fantastically made and fun. But they're spin-offs. They're not Minecraft. Maybe I'm just at that age now where I get bitter about things. I don't know. I give up waiting to be proven wrong.
I have a single shader and a 3D texture pack that basically make it look like the super duper graphics would have, I don't know why Mojang struggled so much
my problem is the lack of control of the lighting and reflections
super duper graphics had nothing to so with ray tracing except the imitation of sun rays, or "godrays", or "volumetric lighting" which is not ray tracing
Hopefully they take advantage of FSR 2.0 it’s a godsend of a tech especially for the longevity of consoles now that they support it and it could definitely help alleviate performance if that’s an issue.
@enrique amaya 🤡
I really really love Minecraft RTX, even 4 years later I am truly amazed by the graphics! I really wish they released first party RTX graphics packs, the third party packs don't feel official.
They made RTX worse over the updates. In Minecraft RTX Beta 1.15 your hand would stay visible when you enter water. In all the new versions like 1.21 your hand goes invisible when it enters the water while your head is above the water. I also want the player to have a shadow no matter if you are in third person or first person. This is all I want them to fix, it's not hard to do right? They haven't looked at RTX anymore since it's release and slowly bugs begin appearing that don't get fixed because seemingly all the people that know how RTX works left or something.
The Super duper graphics pack was not ray traced. That wouldn't of been that great back in 2017 and would have performed badly on PS4 and Xbox One. Although one thing I will say, Minecraft RTX has a ton of potential that is being ignored such as proper parallax occlusion mapping, alternative sun angle, waves in the water based on the size of the body of water, wet surfaces when exposed to rain, and other smaller features. Minecraft Java truly shows what it could look like but Mojang just doing small bug fixes really shows how little they seem to care. Surely they could have a small team dedicated to it
At the end I was scared cause I thought you used Wondershare Filmora to edit video
Filmora is shity. thats all i have to say
I’ve been using RTX for about 2 years on my personal worlds via 3rd party packs, and it’s been great when it works. For a few months in 2021 it just didn’t work at all, and until recently it was extremely buggy and unreliable for me. At least they seem to care enough fix it occasionally.
Mojang is extremely lazy, so it’s not surprising to me RTX has barely been touched since release. It’s a shame because it’s way better than any shader pack on Java, and it’s the ONLY reason I tolerate and use bedrock edition primarily.
Please switch to Java, it is a TON better and it has tons shaders that work very very well
There's literally 100s of shaders in Java, so you're saying you try them all?
It sucks cause I was very hopeful for rtx on next gen Minecraft but realistically nothing is going to happen
Minecraft RTX be like just make everything shiny
The thing is that minecrfat can run super well in cheap pcs and laptops so adding RTX to it would make that impossible
I think they would have to somehow check the device if it is compatable
bruh did you just act like they would make all of minecraft raytraced they have it on mobile and console that both becides the new gen consoles and a few phones could run
Guys you can still do rtx in fact you can do them quite easily just switch to java and you can get countless varieties of rtx shaders that are consistently updated.
you can get shaders but not RTX
My brother in christ, please use RTX Voice when recording your vids, you need it.
I haven't touched Minecraft in two years without raytracing, it feels like an inferior product with it off and it genuinely affects how I build for the better because I take light into account.
Only time it's off is when I feel like using one of my many random texture packs for a change but that's rare
0:50 that trailer wasn't raytraced. nothing accessible to the consumer could handle realtime raytracing at the time let alone the Xbox one x.
Minecraft RTX was my reason to upgrade my PC, and is currently the only way I play mc anymore. Better lighting makes the game feel so much more immersive and beautiful, while retaining the classic vanilla look. And without the need to completely transform the game with shaders to something totally different.
Consider Java Edition with the free Seus PTGI shaderpack
@@brendontaylor7545 I have tried that, but it runs badly on my machine unfortunately
@@FifthOfNovember_Original Tried just the shader version? The original Seus or the remade one. I get 150fps+ on my 3080
@@karljuliuz cause you have a 3080💀
@@bjholland8322 yea your point? 💀
The Super Duper graphics pack wasn't a raytracing pack, it was shaders and enhanced textures that was meant for the Xbox One X which doesn't have any raytracing capability.
You can get the RTX resource packs from the NVidia worlds and pit them in any world
TBH I think minecraft with a solid shader pack like BSL looks even better than minecraft RTX, and at the same time is considerably less demanding to run
My man.. ur volume peaks scare me.. consider using an audio compressor xD
It will simply never make sense to me why Mojang hasn't improved the graphics of Minecraft officially, Shaders run like butter and are crazy stable, they look absolutely phenomenal and do nothing but drastically improve the experience from sunset to sunrise yet just never did it.
Honestly I just like my shaders I don't need any official release or even true Ray tracing
The unofficial RTX texture pack you can play in every world is great and all but there are some limitations as in your render distance is capped to 24 and its still quite buggy in terms of broken light rays.
I felt betrayed they promised Minecraft rtx on series x
The super duper graphics pack wasn’t raytracing, just standard rasterization used in most video games.