Was on the way to sell mine. ( .22 mag ) Been very disappointed in the accuracy. However, I stumbled upon an old, partial box of Winchester 45grain JHP I wasn't aware I still had as I was shooting through my stock. Low and behold, she was shooting some very nice groups. Put up more targets to shoot a comparison between the Winchester and CCI munitions I had on hand. My pathfinder obviously does not like the CCI ... I canceled our divorce and took her home for a good cleaning.
Isn't it funny how much difference just a change of ammo can make? I realize 22LR isn't exactly built to the same specs as larger caliber rounds, but even still, it blows me away how much performance can change from brand to brand
I picked up my Pathfinder from my local Gunsmith. First it had a glitch in the action. Second 2-3 miss/non fire per cylinder. Third, hard to remove the spent cases. I sent the revolver back to Charter. Got my revolver back, went back to the range. Still not good, I contacted Charter they sent to me a new cylinder. The first 8 rounds fired had to be forced out with a nylon rod and plastic mallet. So I sent the revolver back to Charter for the Second time. After 12 weeks of not hearing any thing from Charter I called them. I was told they were replacing it but they needed a current FFL from my smith. I drove some 35 miles to his shop, got the FFL. Called Charter, was told they couldn't accept the FFL over the phone, they needed a paper copy of the FFL sent to them via my smith. Then I was told that the FFL was gotten from his website. They would sent to me/him a replacement Pathfinder as soon as it was MANUFACTORED/BUILT. They have NOTHING is stock? My frustration is at it's end. I have the "Bulldog" in 357 and haven't had any problems with it. I reload for the 357. I also use a Traditions G2 in 357mag, 22 inch barrel. I know what I'm doing when it comes to firearms. US Navy, 6 years. So I thought that the 22 would be a nice addition to go with my 22rf rifles. As it has turned out the Pathfinder to be terrible with way to many problems. I should simply ask for all my money back. There is just way to much "Run around" from Charter concerning this problem.
@@bbo40 Does the Pathfinder you have, have 8 shot cylinder or only 6,because I just seen one advertised as 8. IDK Regarding your issues with your gun, did Charter ever fix or what ? Researching to buy... I appreciate your time spent in responding, thanks
I've never heard that before, but Canada has some very strict barrel-length rules/classifications so it wouldn't surprise me if we measure differently. Every type of firearm that enters this country has to be inspected, classified and approved by the Government so I'm sure if they can measure things in such a way as to make them more restrictive, they do.
Us never heard of on in 44 mag either. It would require a completely different frame to accommodate the longer cartridge. Its one thing to make a mistake it's another to continue it. This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
It was a great review until I saw that you didn't discuss the most important thing-- accuracy. It's a target pistol, and I have no idea how well it shoots based on this video.
i own the 44 sp model, it does not handle magnums btw. I put large pachmayer grips on mine and it is a new gun now. the trigger is unusual but you get used to it. highly recommend the 44 version for the price. the small grips on the 44 would have made for a long day at the range,
It's funny because I'm a fairly small guy so to me the grips on a lot of these new revolvers are wonderful, but I can absolutely see how a larger shooter would find them maddening. One of my friends is 6'7" and built like a tank; seeing him try to handle a small-gripped revolver is like watching someone operate a cell phone with oven mitts.
I agree with most of your points, but cleaning it is not that simple. The finish isn’t that high quality, and burned on powder is very had to clean off. I used kroil, hoppes #9, Lucas bore cleaner, and pro-shot one step, and I had to end up scraping off the burned powder off the cylinder and frame with a razor blade. I had mine for three years, and I shot it a lot. Not many complaints in the reliability or dun department. I sold mine and bought the Smith 617 when I could afford it, but the pathfinder for the money cannot be beat
Another excellent "kit/trail/camp gun" and companion for hunting, fishing, hiking, outdoor survival, and more. Though I'd prefer a .38 Special/.357 Magnum, this .22 revolver would be hard to beat.
Waiting on my snubby version to come in. 8 shot. Nervous because I hear mixed reviews, some run well others have a lot rounds that won't go off. I'll just have to wait and see I guess.
Btw, Charter arms have the fastest action lock time. To me, that is a bonus, I have two Charter arms pistols, Both in .44 special. anyway, I like the quality of the Carter Arms that you get for the price, they are duty guns made for packing around, and if they get dinged up,, So what. How Does the Pathfinder shoot? is it accurate? Dave.
The Pathfinder is pretty much how you described your 44's; which is to say well-built and reliable, if not the prettiest of pea-shooters. I very much consider it to be a 'working mans gun' that will satisfy most shooters.
Don't buy this junk gun at any price. It's unsafe and doesn't operate correctly. My wife bought one, because it is American made and had the features she was looking for, like barrel length, double action, adjustable rear sight and fiber optic front sight. Sounds great until you try to shoot it. Out of the box, the first time fired, the extractor rod jammed. We tried using some gun oil to see if we could free it at home. No luck, so we took the gun to our local gun dealer/smith. They said they repaired it. Citing, excessive oil and debris. Mind you this gun was new, straight out of the box. It had never been oiled by us until after the extractor rod jammed and it never touched the ground or anything besides the box it came in. Since when would excessive oil, jam an extractor rod. Except if you imagine it collected debris, after 6 shots and being put back in the box it came in. The same day we tried firing the gun. In single action, the cylinder did not index properly and required you to manually rotate the cylinder to get it to lock. Alternatively, pulling the hammer back again, caused the cylinder to rotate a live round past the firing pin. Leaving an unfired round in the cylinder. This is very dangerous, for an inexperienced shooter. After you think the last round has been fired, you can pull the trigger in double action, several times, then surprise there's a round being fired. Also the adjustable sight only allows for 1 turn to lower the factory elevation. For her, we could only get an accurate site picture at about 50ft. I would like to be able to adjust it down to 10ft. Also the grip is rather small and they don't offer a larger one. I noticed the star indexing gear at the rear of the cylinder was very small compared to other . 22 revolvers, like the less expensive Ruger Super Wrangler . 22 We sent it back to the factory 2 months ago and haven't heard back. What a waste of money.
Owner of a Charter Arms. 357 mag ss here, great gun, great price, very happy :) Excellent review, thank you.
Ah yes I sold a few CA 357's when I was still in the business, nice piece. Thanks for the feedback.
Got the 2023 version 8 shot! Love it. Aluminum frame lighter version.
Oooooh, haven't seen/tried that yet but it sounds slick.
I love my .44 Special. Great value for the money.
Excellent video. You touched on some great points. Thanks for sharing your gun with us.
Glad you found it interesting.
At the 4:27 mark, that long grove under the barrel would be a good simple long mounting rail for a small flashlight. I wonder if anyone has made such?
No clue, ended up selling mine to invest in another S&W.
Was on the way to sell mine. ( .22 mag )
Been very disappointed in the accuracy.
However, I stumbled upon an old, partial box of Winchester 45grain JHP I wasn't aware I still had as I was shooting through my stock.
Low and behold, she was shooting some very nice groups. Put up more targets to shoot a comparison between the Winchester and CCI munitions I had on hand.
My pathfinder obviously does not like the CCI ...
I canceled our divorce and took her home for a good cleaning.
Isn't it funny how much difference just a change of ammo can make? I realize 22LR isn't exactly built to the same specs as larger caliber rounds, but even still, it blows me away how much performance can change from brand to brand
I'm glad you found your gun's pet load:) keep enjoying it.
I picked up my Pathfinder from my local Gunsmith. First it had a glitch in the action. Second 2-3 miss/non fire per cylinder. Third, hard to remove the spent cases. I sent the revolver back to Charter. Got my revolver back, went back to the range. Still not good, I contacted Charter they sent to me a new cylinder. The first 8 rounds fired had to be forced out with a nylon rod and plastic mallet.
So I sent the revolver back to Charter for the Second time.
After 12 weeks of not hearing any thing from Charter I called them. I was told they were replacing it but they needed a current FFL from my smith. I drove some 35 miles to his shop, got the FFL. Called Charter, was told they couldn't accept the FFL over the phone, they needed a paper copy of the FFL sent to them via my smith. Then I was told that the FFL was gotten from his website. They would sent to me/him a replacement Pathfinder as soon as it was MANUFACTORED/BUILT. They have NOTHING is stock?
My frustration is at it's end.
I have the "Bulldog" in 357 and haven't had any problems with it. I reload for the 357. I also use a Traditions G2 in 357mag, 22 inch barrel.
I know what I'm doing when it comes to firearms. US Navy, 6 years.
So I thought that the 22 would be a nice addition to go with my 22rf rifles.
As it has turned out the Pathfinder to be terrible with way to many problems.
I should simply ask for all my money back.
There is just way to much "Run around" from Charter concerning this problem.
Sorry to hear that. Very disappointing.
Oh geez. Sounds like the one I just purchased ! Have yet to find a gun store that will send it out for me
@@bbo40
Does the Pathfinder you have, have 8 shot cylinder or only 6,because I just seen one advertised as 8. IDK
Regarding your issues with your gun, did Charter ever fix or what ?
Researching to buy...
I appreciate your time spent in responding, thanks
@@Soli_Deo_Gloria_. mine is an 8 shot. I sent it to the factory 2nd week in Sept. and have not heard anything yet.
Looked like a 5" barrel to me. Barrel length is measured to the front of the cylinder.
I've never heard that before, but Canada has some very strict barrel-length rules/classifications so it wouldn't surprise me if we measure differently. Every type of firearm that enters this country has to be inspected, classified and approved by the Government so I'm sure if they can measure things in such a way as to make them more restrictive, they do.
Paul X - True; it’s clearly a 5”.
charterfirearms.com/products/72242-22-lr-target-pathfinder-with-4-2-barrel
I saw it as 5" - Charter Arms Specs give it as 4.2" ... 🤔
I have been in the market for a revolver....this one is at the top of my list.
I think you'll be pleased; it's a great value for dollar.
The target Bulldog comes in .44 special, not magnum, unless Charter Arms has added it since I last looked.
When I still had my shop I sold half a dozen in .44M so I know they're out there.
Us never heard of on in 44 mag either. It would require a completely different frame to accommodate the longer cartridge. Its one thing to make a mistake it's another to continue it. This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
It was a great review until I saw that you didn't discuss the most important thing-- accuracy. It's a target pistol, and I have no idea how well it shoots based on this video.
I never comment on accuracy as without a ransom rest, I'd just be explaining *my* accuracy with it, which is far from objective.
I’ll be picking mine up from the local FFL next week.
It has a two stage extractor- if you look at it, it is basically telescopic.
i own the 44 sp model, it does not handle magnums btw. I put large pachmayer grips on mine and it is a new gun now. the trigger is unusual but you get used to it. highly recommend the 44 version for the price. the small grips on the 44 would have made for a long day at the range,
It's funny because I'm a fairly small guy so to me the grips on a lot of these new revolvers are wonderful, but I can absolutely see how a larger shooter would find them maddening. One of my friends is 6'7" and built like a tank; seeing him try to handle a small-gripped revolver is like watching someone operate a cell phone with oven mitts.
I agree with most of your points, but cleaning it is not that simple. The finish isn’t that high quality, and burned on powder is very had to clean off. I used kroil, hoppes #9, Lucas bore cleaner, and pro-shot one step, and I had to end up scraping off the burned powder off the cylinder and frame with a razor blade.
I had mine for three years, and I shot it a lot. Not many complaints in the reliability or dun department. I sold mine and bought the Smith 617 when I could afford it, but the pathfinder for the money cannot be beat
I have a Pathfinder snubbie that I love. I ordered the " old school" wood grips which are more conceable.
Ah I've always wanted to try a snub-nose revolver, but never going to happen in this country.
Good review.
Another excellent "kit/trail/camp gun" and companion for hunting, fishing, hiking, outdoor survival, and more. Though I'd prefer a .38 Special/.357 Magnum, this .22 revolver would be hard to beat.
Should have 8 shot capacity but I guess that helps keep cost down.
A lot people refuse to buy anything but a six for some reason.
It does now I just got one and it has 8 shot capacity
Waiting on my snubby version to come in. 8 shot. Nervous because I hear mixed reviews, some run well others have a lot rounds that won't go off. I'll just have to wait and see I guess.
Btw, Charter arms have the fastest action lock time. To me, that is a bonus, I have two Charter arms pistols, Both in .44 special. anyway, I like the quality of the Carter Arms that you get for the price, they are duty guns made for packing around, and if they get dinged up,, So what. How Does the Pathfinder shoot? is it accurate? Dave.
The Pathfinder is pretty much how you described your 44's; which is to say well-built and reliable, if not the prettiest of pea-shooters. I very much consider it to be a 'working mans gun' that will satisfy most shooters.
hello do you know revolver alpha proj 3541s stainless 357magnum construction czech republic opinion thanks in advance
Never owned one, sorry.
American here, I want this as my 1st handgun
perfect review! thanks a lot. told me everything i needed to know
Glad you found it useful; thanks so much for the comment.
Dude, you do a great gun review. Move out of Commada to the States so you can do reviews on more guns. :)
I would love to, but my job is here.
Do you think this revolver is reliable enough to hunt small game with? I’m trying to decide between one of these and a semi auto target pistol.
I don't see why not; haven't had any issues with it.
The only thing I would miss is the shiny surface.
i love mine
I don’t think Charter makes a .44 magnum. .44 Special yes, .44 Mag... no.
Exactly
I have one
Nice little pistol
A lot of ppl say this gun suck was gonna buy today but Ima just grab the new ruger lcrx 🔫👅
Don't buy this junk gun at any price. It's unsafe and doesn't operate correctly.
My wife bought one, because it is American made and had the features she was looking for, like barrel length, double action, adjustable rear sight and fiber optic front sight.
Sounds great until you try to shoot it.
Out of the box, the first time fired, the extractor rod jammed. We tried using some gun oil to see if we could free it at home. No luck, so we took the gun to our local gun dealer/smith. They said they repaired it. Citing, excessive oil and debris. Mind you this gun was new, straight out of the box. It had never been oiled by us until after the extractor rod jammed and it never touched the ground or anything besides the box it came in. Since when would excessive oil, jam an extractor rod. Except if you imagine it collected debris, after 6 shots and being put back in the box it came in.
The same day we tried firing the gun. In single action, the cylinder did not index properly and required you to manually rotate the cylinder to get it to lock. Alternatively, pulling the hammer back again, caused the cylinder to rotate a live round past the firing pin. Leaving an unfired round in the cylinder. This is very dangerous, for an inexperienced shooter. After you think the last round has been fired, you can pull the trigger in double action, several times, then surprise there's a round being fired.
Also the adjustable sight only allows for 1 turn to lower the factory elevation. For her, we could only get an accurate site picture at about 50ft.
I would like to be able to adjust it down to 10ft. Also the grip is rather small and they don't offer a larger one.
I noticed the star indexing gear at the rear of the cylinder was very small compared to other . 22 revolvers, like the less expensive Ruger Super Wrangler . 22
We sent it back to the factory 2 months ago and haven't heard back. What a waste of money.
I am not impressed with mine. Fit and finish is lousy , even with having to return it back to the manufacture once for a 'spitting' problem
Oh my gosh!!! KILL THAT MUSIC!!! terrible! exiting out as fast as I can
Oh goodness I left a thumbs up until he said it comes in 44 Magnum. It comes in 44 special so thumbs down