Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • LRASM is a long range, precision-guided anti-ship missile leveraging off of the successful JASSM-ER heritage, and is designed to meet the needs of U.S. Navy and Air Force warfighters.

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @chetankandpal6674
    @chetankandpal6674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5661

    Amazing advertising, I am convinced .Going to order 2 FA-18 and 10 LRASM

    • @gigachad8425
      @gigachad8425 2 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      underrated

    • @SahilKhan-ws5hb
      @SahilKhan-ws5hb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      A varyyy good choice indeed

    • @tinto278
      @tinto278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      lol F/A-18 is Boeing LOL if you worked in the defense industry you would know how funny that sounds LOLOOLOL order hornets from Lockheed LOOLOLOLOL

    • @debmalyaghosh3474
      @debmalyaghosh3474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      🤣🤣🤣
      Me too...for Diwali

    • @Abhinav-gu2ui
      @Abhinav-gu2ui 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@debmalyaghosh3474 🤣

  • @Jake-rs9nq
    @Jake-rs9nq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3353

    I like how Lockheed creates a CGI enemy combatant ship that just happens to look exactly like a Russian ship.

    • @kguy6635
      @kguy6635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +234

      Slava Ukraini!

    • @strategiccommander4736
      @strategiccommander4736 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      ​@@kguy6635 Heroyam salo

    • @fluffyx1556
      @fluffyx1556 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      atleast its historically accurate

    • @derprofi-ky4zn
      @derprofi-ky4zn ปีที่แล้ว +22

      yeah I think it’s a Russian Varyag Class Destroyer

    • @derprofi-ky4zn
      @derprofi-ky4zn ปีที่แล้ว +10

      * Cruiser

  • @R9A9V2
    @R9A9V2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8690

    Heres a cool name:
    Orbital Range Global Anti Ship Missile (ORGASM)

    • @LightYourDarkness
      @LightYourDarkness 4 ปีที่แล้ว +401

      Good one

    • @howard5030
      @howard5030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +157

      C TheeZee we'll be waiting for that to happen

    • @hangugkr
      @hangugkr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      ahahha nice!

    • @jaemelcollado6394
      @jaemelcollado6394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      C TheeZee bright kid

    • @pdfrchieve
      @pdfrchieve 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Hhahaha good one m8

  • @thuhan3100
    @thuhan3100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2083

    One of the ship in the video is no longer a surface vessel. It's now a special operation sub.

    • @5tarSailor
      @5tarSailor ปีที่แล้ว

      Russia has 2 more slavas. But we can turn that to 0 soon if we just go to war

    • @phillipmavrogenis2041
      @phillipmavrogenis2041 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Hahahaha good one.

    • @nightraven836
      @nightraven836 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Yamato class Coral Reef :D

    • @edvin_hook
      @edvin_hook ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Life hack why buy one when one can be both

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rocket - from usa...
      Missile guidance - from the usa...
      Operation management - from usa...
      Result - the United States sank a Russian ship that did not threaten the United States.
      And now in Ohio, people are being poisoned after a train crash and a chemical spill. In another state, a hydrochloric acid tank overturned - also poisoning people.
      Retribution?

  • @stanleycahyono1013
    @stanleycahyono1013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5368

    Another Cool Name:
    High Altitude Next-Gen Defense Joint Operation Bomb (HANDJOB)

    • @squishy2229
      @squishy2229 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

      Y E S .

    • @thecommentator3732
      @thecommentator3732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      Noise

    • @victornavea6197
      @victornavea6197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      Underrated coment

    • @bobkin611
      @bobkin611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +336

      Worst H.A.N.D.J.O.B. the enemy has ever had

    • @richardmillhousenixon
      @richardmillhousenixon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Only thing that makes this kinda not work is the fact that NORAD is an acronym in itself

  • @Johnspartansworld
    @Johnspartansworld 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6052

    Lockheed Martin is uploading the videos on youtube like peoples gonna buy it xddddd

    • @captainawasome8985
      @captainawasome8985 4 ปีที่แล้ว +625

      I buy their stocks so... that makes me part owner of those cool toys! - Even if i cant have fun with them myself.

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

      *secret technology*

    • @liberatetheworld1776
      @liberatetheworld1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      It’s been tested and proven.

    • @m_louie
      @m_louie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      We are i mean its expensive but it is worth it i mean the technology behind it all is amazing

    • @liberatetheworld1776
      @liberatetheworld1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Just wait until a war where America can use theses babies.

  • @colers2366
    @colers2366 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3094

    It is the year 2022, and we now know:
    Yes, the Slava class missile cruiser indeed needs 2 missiles to die

    • @anderslindstrom2336
      @anderslindstrom2336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +448

      Not only does it die to just two missiles, it dies to just two non-stealthy Harpoon-skis.

    • @D3R3bel
      @D3R3bel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +723

      Russia : hypes up every single one of their military equipment and gives completely fictacious claims as to their capabilities
      US DOD : OH FUCK OH NO WE NEED NEXT GEN TECH TO STAY RELEVANT NOWWWW
      *Accidentally makes weapon 20 years ahead of enemy tech*

    • @Husker513
      @Husker513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      Many people thought it's not true and pentagon's dream, but it's real

    • @randomperson5775
      @randomperson5775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +244

      @@D3R3bel isnt that how the F-15 was made

    • @D3R3bel
      @D3R3bel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @@randomperson5775 yes.

  • @joshuafang3033
    @joshuafang3033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    It seems like we don't need to worry about the Slava class anymore

  • @scarface1367
    @scarface1367 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2578

    Me: just browsing youtube for some new videos
    TH-cam: let's throw you some experimental military porn from 4 years ago because why not
    Edit: how and why did this get so much attention

  • @nicos1097
    @nicos1097 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3907

    The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t

    • @princevegeta6236
      @princevegeta6236 5 ปีที่แล้ว +124

      It is able to where it isn't by deviation and variation.

    • @mobiusone_8483
      @mobiusone_8483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Bullshits 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

    • @ryanchuabowen2045
      @ryanchuabowen2045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      @@Mono-tc3mq A documentary explaining vectors badly

    • @christianitis
      @christianitis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Nicos Eftychiou it knows this because it knows where it has been, or where it was

    • @topmovieclips7032
      @topmovieclips7032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      th-cam.com/video/PwOnlmGd_Hg/w-d-xo.html

  • @supreme_nova
    @supreme_nova 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3631

    When will this game release? Looks realistic af

  • @Trojan0304
    @Trojan0304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +577

    Recent sinking show Russian ships can’t shoot down regular missiles let alone a stealth type

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Worry about china's missle defense systems. They might work like how we thought russia's would

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      There were leaked reports on how their systems were non mission-capable, unmaintained, crews not trained, SAMs didn't work, Radars nowhere near ready for deployment, but they needed show of force.

    • @arizonamidnight5294
      @arizonamidnight5294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@tracym8952 we'll find out soon enough

    • @unsungheroes8556
      @unsungheroes8556 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tracym8952 china missile tech and defense systems is a copy from russia so.

    • @deebil8099
      @deebil8099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tracym8952 China's missile defense systems are copies of Russia's missile defense systems. Even if they don't break, they are still designed to not work like the Russian missile defense system.

  • @realexivus950
    @realexivus950 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6326

    Back in WWII, they called those Japanese pilots.

  • @FungalumisBush
    @FungalumisBush 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2887

    This battle is literally them shooting 3 missiles at the enemy. But the music and animations make it seem so much more epic.

    • @globallyfamouse6609
      @globallyfamouse6609 3 ปีที่แล้ว +182

      firing 3 misiles at an enemy war ship is pretty cool

    • @secondlayer7898
      @secondlayer7898 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      that's what modern naval battles are

    • @koekiejam18
      @koekiejam18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      @@secondlayer7898 nope, modern naval battles is shooting hundreds of missiles from really far away. If an attack with these missiles would ever take place, it would be a swarm of missiles. only 3 will easily get picked off by CIWS's and other surface to air defense systems.

    • @ReformedSooner24
      @ReformedSooner24 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I swear I’ve heard the music from somewhere before

    • @richardmoore609
      @richardmoore609 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@koekiejam18 a missile this fast and low to the water is very hard to lock on the fly

  • @plague6566
    @plague6566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +577

    Ace combat fans:
    Hey,I've seen this one before

    • @mystyle_jm8997
      @mystyle_jm8997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Land-Attack Cruise Missile? Superior than LAGM and LASM as a combination between Damage Output and Blast Radius.

    • @viruspter1dactl
      @viruspter1dactl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      True on my channel i play ac7

    • @viruspter1dactl
      @viruspter1dactl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mystyle_jm8997 NO LSAM

    • @thebuddy4517
      @thebuddy4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Lockheed Martin=gründer industries

    • @scarface1367
      @scarface1367 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thebuddy4517 wait, that actually makes sense

  • @sirethanthegreat4069
    @sirethanthegreat4069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    How ironic. In the vid, the Moskva died. Couple years later that exact thing happened, but with Neptune missiles.

    • @сергейКурмыза-щ4й
      @сергейКурмыза-щ4й 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Typical propaganda: in reality, Mosva was sunked by the frogman, not missile. Neptune is just a copy of the Russian Uran missile.

    • @pvt.potato1943
      @pvt.potato1943 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@сергейКурмыза-щ4йDoes that really make it better?

    • @pvt.potato1943
      @pvt.potato1943 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@сергейКурмыза-щ4йInstead of your flagship being sunk by a guided missile, it was sunk by some bloke with an explosive charge underwater.

    • @sethb3090
      @sethb3090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @user-tm3si7pw3u So you're saying a Russian anti ship missile couldn't have done the job?
      Reject missile, return to frog

    • @nonplayablecarecter1712
      @nonplayablecarecter1712 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@сергейКурмыза-щ4й Russian bot detected

  • @quantomic1106
    @quantomic1106 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2049

    Is this on steam?

    • @ashwanishahrawat4607
      @ashwanishahrawat4607 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Well played :D

    • @f22rhaptor
      @f22rhaptor 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Actually in Arma 3 some mods make this possible

    • @phalcon23
      @phalcon23 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      You want DCS... its an actual simulator.

    • @IvanNava
      @IvanNava 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Ace Combat 7

    • @4ries2209
      @4ries2209 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Ace Combat 7 is vr games, cant afford VR

  • @simula152
    @simula152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1419

    Imagine you're in the year 2030. You're a pilot and accidentally fire this missile and you think of nothing, but 30 minutes later you get a "Friendly Fire -50 pts" pop-up

    • @Wickedonezz
      @Wickedonezz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      It requires previous lock on

    • @vereinigtekonigreicheoster35
      @vereinigtekonigreicheoster35 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      To be fair nowadays missiles lock on very quickly

    • @guyschell2321
      @guyschell2321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      I was in Afghanistan in the brigade TOC when the Air Force accidentally dropped a 500 pound bomb on one of our own bases because they got the bad guys position and the good guys position mixed up WHEN DROPPING A 500 FUCKING POUND BOMB a JDAM and you never heard about it lol

    • @MickShoemaker17
      @MickShoemaker17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      "You will be returned to the hanger if you continue to harm frendlies"

    • @PrethorynPete
      @PrethorynPete 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine this: FUNNY DID LAUGH

  • @fieryspy6414
    @fieryspy6414 5 ปีที่แล้ว +926

    You forgot to turn on RTX

    • @Phenom98
      @Phenom98 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      The missile would travel at just 50% of the speed if u turn that shit on.

    • @Anderson_Hwang
      @Anderson_Hwang 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      missile would travel at 30 fps only

    • @drixan563
      @drixan563 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What RTX means??

    • @Anderson_Hwang
      @Anderson_Hwang 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@drixan563 Ray tracing, a technology that traces light in real time, its on NVIDIA graphics cards and somehow became a meme

    • @OctogonOxygen024816
      @OctogonOxygen024816 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Anderson_Hwang is it hard on the graphics card or something?

  • @tony9146
    @tony9146 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    I love the direction Lockheed Martin is going with this drop. Finally copped a couple of new LRASM after missing the initial launch and all the restocks.

  • @ya_boi_zach5140
    @ya_boi_zach5140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    Me at 3 AM: I need sleep. Also me: hehe long range missile go b o o m

    • @sarahsolari628
      @sarahsolari628 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      better: POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  • @darkenkgb5812
    @darkenkgb5812 5 ปีที่แล้ว +917

    1:28 thank god the camera guy survived

    • @wiwbssjh8233
      @wiwbssjh8233 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Lol

    • @massib4523
      @massib4523 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it was a drone

    • @shridhars1821
      @shridhars1821 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hhahahaaaa

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@massib4523 no, he typed sv_cheats 1 1 and was in noclip stop making jokes about dangerous jobs he almost died

    • @williampercival7662
      @williampercival7662 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      These weapons of distruction are only good for killing ourselves, that's human intelligence.
      William Percival New Zealand Gardenia Band 🇨🇰 Kia Orana

  • @Rocky-kx4vo
    @Rocky-kx4vo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +596

    Imagine all that machines hard work and calculations for nothing because some big ass bird accidentally hit it out of the sky😂

    • @lorentzcoffin4957
      @lorentzcoffin4957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      million dollar missile vs Albatross

    • @vicmic7936
      @vicmic7936 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂😂

    • @PySnek
      @PySnek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the enemy has also countermeasures and will shoot the LRASM down

    • @dylankolby5450
      @dylankolby5450 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@PySnek no no no..... It's American, remember?

    • @PriceTheCourier
      @PriceTheCourier 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@PySnek Well, I think this Missile is much harder to detect so before they know it. It's already too late.

  • @russa4836
    @russa4836 2 ปีที่แล้ว +291

    Fun fact , 4.16 This warship is now really wrecked.

    • @efzap6516
      @efzap6516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      To a missile system that is far inferior to this. Lmao

    • @burroaks7
      @burroaks7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@efzap6516 prophetic irony at its finest

    • @josephkermitjoestar3881
      @josephkermitjoestar3881 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      not really wrecked, just converted into a permanent underwater warship.

    • @davidv.2050
      @davidv.2050 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Moskva on special mission to Davy Jones Locker.

    • @keepingcalm6469
      @keepingcalm6469 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Westerners exagerate - the fire is under control now.

  • @TheMiniatureRobot
    @TheMiniatureRobot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    When AWACS Longcaster says "Counteract enemy CIWS with a low approach or use missiles outside of intercept range"

  • @vandarkholme4745
    @vandarkholme4745 4 ปีที่แล้ว +602

    amazing how much length we go to blow each other up

    • @rock3tcatU233
      @rock3tcatU233 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      I know, awesome right?

    • @NOU-iw3gb
      @NOU-iw3gb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@zeffez8161
      "Sad" lmao. Stfu cupcake

    • @belgianfried
      @belgianfried 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@NOU-iw3gb If you had not chosen to use slang words like "stfu" and "lmao", maybe I would've taken you seriously.
      Grow up, idiotic youth.

    • @Homunculus144
      @Homunculus144 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@belgianfried those arent words nor are they slang

    • @FungalumisBush
      @FungalumisBush 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zeffez8161 if you think about it, with how dangerous the us is, people probably wont fight us. All the nations know that if nuclear war broke out, humanity would go extinct. I feel that despite all the hate we have for eachother, we all still agree on to not wipe ourselves out.

  • @lushhclub819
    @lushhclub819 3 ปีที่แล้ว +969

    Lockheed letting the enemy know what to expect so they can develope a counter measure

    • @MrCoolguy425
      @MrCoolguy425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +291

      If the enemy didn’t know what to expect before this video went up, I don’t think we need to worry about development of anything, let alone a countermeasure.

    • @tollevkvendbo
      @tollevkvendbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@MrCoolguy425 'the enemy' being?

    • @overlord4404
      @overlord4404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If this is the best they can offer then "the enemy" has nothing to worry about

    • @MrCoolguy425
      @MrCoolguy425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      @@tollevkvendbo the enemy being anyone. If Any nation that wants to develop a countermeasure to this, didn’t know about the weapons development itself before this video went up, through various methods, then they likely are not a nation that would have the ability to develop a countermeasure to it.

    • @munk_ken
      @munk_ken 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      How else to you get new contracts?

  • @trekkie1
    @trekkie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    Six years later, this become true

    • @keepingcalm6469
      @keepingcalm6469 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Also the desired point of impact seemed to be fitting.... maybe this video inspired something :)

  • @TrikeSquadron
    @TrikeSquadron 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1385

    if you can do it in Kerbal Space Program... it will work in the real world of course.

    • @emielsnoeijers
      @emielsnoeijers 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      BD armory mod is the best! XD

    • @peqbox
      @peqbox 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol

    • @artwingtonr.4647
      @artwingtonr.4647 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I never know how to use the BD armory cruise missile.

    • @mansoorsandhue4682
      @mansoorsandhue4682 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +KingKL h

    • @PaiSAMSEN
      @PaiSAMSEN 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Set GPS coordinate, assign it to the missile, then assign a key to launch your missile, or simply right click on it, then select "fire".

  • @firstnamelastname7113
    @firstnamelastname7113 5 ปีที่แล้ว +582

    So that's what the highest graphics setting looks like

  • @CLKlasse
    @CLKlasse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Update 2022, Moskva ship number 121 have sink in black sea.

  • @larrylyon6695
    @larrylyon6695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +442

    The Rapid Dragon launches up to 9 palletized LRSMS from a C-17 or C-130 at one time instead of only 2 from an F-18. Using cargo airplanes to launch LRSM swarms is a big force multiplier in both land attack and surface warfare. Tests confirmed the concept in January 2022.

    • @benjaminherrington8124
      @benjaminherrington8124 ปีที่แล้ว

      who the fuck are you larry

    • @e.s.4017
      @e.s.4017 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Back here after they released a video recently and holy shit

    • @mfawls9624
      @mfawls9624 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Those things are scary beautiful.

    • @Gigachadent
      @Gigachadent ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How would it fare if enemy ships had a similar CIWS defense system as the phalanx?

    • @hermes_0440
      @hermes_0440 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Gigachadent A Single CWIS has around 2500 rounds of ammo and a rate of fire of ca. 60 Rounds per second. A C-17 can carry 45 LRASM/JASSM. If you do the math (2500/45=55) it shows that you can only use 55 rounds per Missile before you need to reload wich leaves no room for missing also it has to be reloaded manually wich is very dangerous during a battle. If you have two CWIS like the Burke class the you have better chances as long as only one C-17 drops rapid dragon. The best defence you could have is what the German Bundesmarine(Federal Navy) is doing and mount cannons that use FAPDS or AHEAD ammunition like the Mantis system.

  • @ДмитроКислинський-г1н
    @ДмитроКислинський-г1н 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Two Ukrainian missiles "Neptun" was enough to destroy this "powerful" cruiser.

    • @tylerwilliams33
      @tylerwilliams33 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ukrainian? Okay.

    • @eze3922
      @eze3922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tylerwilliams33 it was the ukrainian modified version of the soviet one.

    • @masonhidari
      @masonhidari 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tylerwilliams33 whats the difference , the point was something else

    • @FannaD
      @FannaD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@eze3922 No, this is actually a Ukrainian development, which was created based on Soviet documentation.

    • @AckzaTV
      @AckzaTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who cares? The war is on the land and russia took a lot of land from ukraine ...no way ukraine can resist the entire russian military . It's over .

  • @YOLO___
    @YOLO___ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Lol Neptune got the kill first, sorry guys. 🤣🤣

  • @TheArakhan
    @TheArakhan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Have you seen this after Moskva sunk?

    • @NguyenLyubyuStrana
      @NguyenLyubyuStrana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It not sunk,it turn into submarine

    • @tobyw9573
      @tobyw9573 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NguyenLyubyuStrana Several subs, I expect.

  • @w_elder2199
    @w_elder2199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    meanwhile red CIWS: "am i joke to you?"

    • @jeffreyprezalar220
      @jeffreyprezalar220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Not that the ciws is a joke but these missles supposedly almost triple the stealth profile of f22 and in thei final attack phase they are wave riders.

    • @LMau-t9r
      @LMau-t9r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jeffreyprezalar220 wanted to point that out

    • @w_elder2199
      @w_elder2199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @Ee 3D lol same shit bruh

    • @MotoControlRu
      @MotoControlRu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      @Ee 3D They got nothing on modern ones. Modern russian cruisers sink themselves.

    • @FarizTrinidad
      @FarizTrinidad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ciwis lol

  • @code-in-rhyme
    @code-in-rhyme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    But Moskva sank yesterday, by 2 Neptun.

  • @Elliott300
    @Elliott300 4 ปีที่แล้ว +495

    Lmao i love how they use a russian destroyer as the target 😂😂😂😂

    • @عبداللّٰهبنأبيبكرالجلال
      @عبداللّٰهبنأبيبكرالجلال 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      How did you know it is russian?!!

    • @thatlithuanianboi6812
      @thatlithuanianboi6812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      @@عبداللّٰهبنأبيبكرالجلال whole ship looks like Slava class, which is - indeed Russian

    • @tonyfortier8835
      @tonyfortier8835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Weapons manufacturers dream for a war with Russia. You can't make money when you're not at war when you make weapons

    • @ryanchuabowen2045
      @ryanchuabowen2045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      The US's enemy is Russia. This ads prob catered to US officials, so why not?

    • @tonyfortier8835
      @tonyfortier8835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@ryanchuabowen2045 it certainly isnt catered To average joes like you and me my friend. And acquiring an fighter jet isn't as easy as buying a pack of gum !

  • @antiglobaljoel532
    @antiglobaljoel532 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Haha! A Slava class cruiser? When fiction becomes reality.

    • @burroaks7
      @burroaks7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      check out it's hull number lmfao

  • @KuyaWelsTv
    @KuyaWelsTv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Its 2022, Ukraines Neptune missile have already sunk one of Russias naval pride "Moskva", let us just prepare this toys for near peer adversary like China someday.

    • @MironSmithX
      @MironSmithX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The "Moskva" russian flagship, sinked from a direct hit of two of Ukranian missiles was literally that ship from 4:18 on this video. The ship class matches, even the hull number matches.

  • @theephemeralglade1935
    @theephemeralglade1935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    "Did we score at least a hit?!"
    "Yes Captain! "
    "Oh thank God! Those three missiles were one year's worth of the entire Navy's budget!"

    • @sunrisejackdaw1779
      @sunrisejackdaw1779 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      "Good news, we've bankrupted the United States Navy!"
      "What's the bad news?"
      "We're out of ships to use."

    • @-coolerlegothings-9784
      @-coolerlegothings-9784 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      An attack like this would cost around 12 million for the missiles, but at least the enemy lost something 100 times as valuable

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@-coolerlegothings-9784 yep, destroyers cost about 1 billion, and the Moskva was a very expensive cruiser

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you're working with the Russian navy budget, atleast

    • @tobyw9573
      @tobyw9573 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      F-35s are now cheaper to buy than F-18s. Gotta consider how much is paid for development, startup, and service.

  • @EnergYbomB
    @EnergYbomB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    4:16 hey, thats the moskwa
    Lockheed Martin already knew it 2016

  • @pigpigabcde
    @pigpigabcde 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    spoiler:you don't need three lrasm to sink a slava class cruiser

    • @Ryan_Christopher
      @Ryan_Christopher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well technically it was two missiles for the cruiser, and one for the destroyer.

    • @huafu7639
      @huafu7639 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just need a strom and rain lol

  • @잘들어라쫌
    @잘들어라쫌 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    • @cRisXzX
      @cRisXzX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Éso es lo qué expresaron los UCRANIANOS al hundir el moskvá.

  • @pattap9033
    @pattap9033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    is this the Moskva? ... lol XD

    • @Skiesaremine
      @Skiesaremine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same class anyways.

    • @MironSmithX
      @MironSmithX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      same hull number at 4:18

    • @AntonGudenus
      @AntonGudenus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep... the hull number and ship type match.
      As does being sunk by the impact of 2 anti-ship missiles.

  • @ludicrousspeed6422
    @ludicrousspeed6422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    It's amazing how good those computers onboard the missile need to be.

    • @yotamxo
      @yotamxo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      got the rtx

    • @Panchoproductions2069
      @Panchoproductions2069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      16gb ram

    • @jmcglockYT
      @jmcglockYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      AMD 9

    • @sussy9278
      @sussy9278 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      420 ram

    • @椰好耶
      @椰好耶 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      导弹搭在的cpu运算性能实际真不算高。。

  • @alexanderwarriner8481
    @alexanderwarriner8481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Bye bye Moskva. Give the graphic design team a raise lol.

    • @osvaldomedina2577
      @osvaldomedina2577 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly..😊😊😊.......the graph is from Moskva, fuck you Putin

  • @타농부-n8b
    @타농부-n8b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    And actually Moskva sank with two missiles

    • @tuphan4134
      @tuphan4134 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ukraine high command never confirm they shoot it, only the mayor of the city say it, do you guys really believe in that propanganda ?

    • @k1tsun386
      @k1tsun386 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ntf5211 Nimitz was older than the Moskva and still in service

    • @kadendookie178
      @kadendookie178 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was sunk by a missile system inferior to this

  • @nafisfuadayon6832
    @nafisfuadayon6832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    And it happened in real life in 2022! according to Ukraine. But Naptune instead of LARSAM.

  • @fred7832
    @fred7832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Two Neptune are enough.

  • @burroaks7
    @burroaks7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is prophetic irony at its finest lmfao

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Provided to you by the time traveling wizards at skunkworks

    • @burroaks7
      @burroaks7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tracym8952 I am a satisfied taxpayer lmao

    • @AntonGudenus
      @AntonGudenus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Down to the hull number actually

    • @NeurodivergentSuperiority
      @NeurodivergentSuperiority 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I swear on Allah you snarky TH-cam commenters are the least relateable people ever

  • @shulerjordan1957
    @shulerjordan1957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    哈哈哈哈 莫斯科号已经没了 用鱼叉就够了

  • @ЄгорКапранов-щ6я
    @ЄгорКапранов-щ6я ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Slava class. with 121. Guess her name :) Yep, it is moskva . Thanks Lockheed Martin! LOL

  • @giovannimatichecchia5656
    @giovannimatichecchia5656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    I asked my wife a couple of those for Christmas, but she told me to try and be nicer with the neighbour instead.

  • @levilecrone3456
    @levilecrone3456 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The most unrealistic part of this video is the Russian defenses actually engage.

  • @brandonng4292
    @brandonng4292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    This video has aged like fine wine. Keep up the fight, Ukraine!

  • @painfield6022
    @painfield6022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Wow, It was realized by 🇺🇦 !

    • @Husker513
      @Husker513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      After the sunk of Moskva?)

    • @painfield6022
      @painfield6022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Husker513 Yes, I mean, It became ture by Ukraine.

    • @Husker513
      @Husker513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@painfield6022 yee, many people thought it's pentagon's dream but its real))

  • @geonerd
    @geonerd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1263

    Cute cartoon, but In the REAL WORLD, the Rooskies will actually make an effort to defend themselves.

    • @TheInfamousMrFox
      @TheInfamousMrFox 6 ปีที่แล้ว +173

      They'll try, sure. But they're 2 decades behind the west in technology, hence them losing a ground war to Ukraine. Then there's the fact they have an economy worth less than Italy which really hampers both development of new tech and their ability to field any significant number of anything even vaguely advanced.

    • @williamalm9603
      @williamalm9603 6 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      that is not really true, they have a lot of gear that is advanced enough to fight war. especially on the army side. The tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are good. and so is the anti air. That is a thing that is often forgotten. a A10 is no use without air superiority.

    • @lukasvtipil9951
      @lukasvtipil9951 6 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      In matter of defending against anti ship missiles is russia actually in front of Nato. In reality two or three asm are no problem for rusian cwis if they have the best cwis (probably the kashtan cwis)

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 6 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      Well, Russia is quite good at drawing propaganda anime too.

    • @williamalm9603
      @williamalm9603 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      the thing is. you never drop two or three from the same direction. You dop ten from different direktions (if you know that you can not over load the system) by that i mean that you send enough missiles to brake though the defenses. That is the Russian doctrine. They know that the Aegis system is too good to fool with a small amount of missiles so they try to overrun it.

  • @AllDay3090
    @AllDay3090 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    As of 2022, the Russian ship in this video is now a submarine.

  • @kimjong-uny4884
    @kimjong-uny4884 7 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    Can I have one?

    • @dongchankim2417
      @dongchankim2417 6 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      I know you've been nice this year, but US couldn't trust you yet...so, sorry, not for now...

    • @ulgrinscpguvenligi4868
      @ulgrinscpguvenligi4868 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nuke

    • @drivethru7565
      @drivethru7565 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      No you cant

    • @LuftUberSoldat
      @LuftUberSoldat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wait for secreat santa for this year
      May be U got the chance with armed one

    • @blazingfox2913
      @blazingfox2913 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never

  • @jasonzhang4303
    @jasonzhang4303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It is very interesting that Ukraine sank Moskva with two 80's missiles(lol

    • @GM-xk1nw
      @GM-xk1nw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No one knows what type of missile was used.

    • @TheMemeDynamics
      @TheMemeDynamics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@GM-xk1nw They used two P-360 Neptunes. The Ukrainian equivalent of the UGM-84 Harpoon

    • @AAAaaa11159
      @AAAaaa11159 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      80's? Really?
      The missile was first revealed at the 2015 Arms and Security international exhibition in Kyiv.
      According to information from open sources, the first flight samples of the cruise missile were manufactured in the second quarter of 2016.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-360_Neptune

    • @hueyrosayaga
      @hueyrosayaga 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AAAaaa11159 They were probably talking about the technology.

  • @АлександрРусаков-ц6т
    @АлександрРусаков-ц6т 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    1 beautiful movie filmed
    2 money taken
    3 received bonuses
    4 went to drink vodka and dreaming about bonuses
    5 supply to the army, what the fuck the army, better show our rocket in the next Iron Man

  • @westprogamer3294
    @westprogamer3294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sorry Lockheed Martin but the target is already at the bottom of the ocean thanks to Ukrainian forces, better luck next time.

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're go getters. And by that I mean they'll go to the bottom of the black sea to get the moskva so they can use it as a proof of concept

  • @nephilimson
    @nephilimson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It was a predictable video of cruiser Moskva's fate) but actually, it died from 2 Ukrainian Neptune missiles)

  • @TheGaMeL0rD
    @TheGaMeL0rD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Well, I think you don´t need anything this suffisticated to sink a slava class destroyer, as we saw in ukraine lol.

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      True that's why it's built for the type 003 aircraft carrier.

  • @rn-2196
    @rn-2196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Lockheed Martin predicted the demise of the moskva 6 years ago😂

  • @UCoPofs_Sng1KplEVhl2c7Zw
    @UCoPofs_Sng1KplEVhl2c7Zw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It really happens by Ukraine!

  • @CHUUMPASS
    @CHUUMPASS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    this is actually very exciting to watch. the tension constantly builds to the boiling point until the perfect climax and happy end.
    serious topic, but this definitely makes for an entertaining presentation.

    • @JamesWitte
      @JamesWitte ปีที่แล้ว

      Orgasmic war porn you mean

  • @xPrevailingGaming
    @xPrevailingGaming 6 ปีที่แล้ว +487

    When an nerd on the Internet thinks they know more than the companies who have been designing and supplying the defense industry for many decades.

    • @LilBoulevard
      @LilBoulevard 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      When it’s an official channel

    • @unassigned6106
      @unassigned6106 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Do you even know Lockheed Martin?

    • @yukinokf2480
      @yukinokf2480 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Vande you’re dumb lol

    • @fakeaintreal
      @fakeaintreal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      ye but you stupid to not realise this "video" is biased as fuck, so its a very cool missile but you have to consider that its the company behind the missile that is also making this video.---

    • @ronin-dp6ls
      @ronin-dp6ls 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      fakeaintreal ye but ur idiot im smart ok shut up noob at researching on videos ISIOT

  • @VulkanYT
    @VulkanYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Isnt this a copy/Slava class design like the Moskva that Ukraine sank not long ago? Lmaoo

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is good eye

    • @MironSmithX
      @MironSmithX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is literally that ship! look up the hull number 4:18

  • @Chimpunk729
    @Chimpunk729 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Love it when LM shows a realistic render even using competitor's F/A 18 to support the realistic. Great.

  • @PMMM9
    @PMMM9 8 ปีที่แล้ว +585

    Nice animation; Does it actually work?

    • @jayyoutube8790
      @jayyoutube8790 8 ปีที่แล้ว +122

      It sure dose.. In fact, their is a lot more to it than what was shown, but it was classified.. That's where the magic happens

    • @bonkersblock
      @bonkersblock 8 ปีที่แล้ว +196

      You should give Lockheed the coordinates of your house and tell them to use LRASM to find out if it works??😂

    • @docark3224
      @docark3224 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hahaha.... soo true.

    • @marconius101
      @marconius101 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      If the other party, sleeps, doesn't look and is totally incapable. Yeah sure...

    • @jayyoutube8790
      @jayyoutube8790 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They would never see it comming..

  • @Mykyta_Nedilya
    @Mykyta_Nedilya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ой, та шо там той крейсер топити, складнощі які вигадуєте) байрактаром бац, Нептуном бац і все

  • @wyattsman2492
    @wyattsman2492 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    The military: we need a new gun
    Lockheed Martin :

  • @grandstarchief3226
    @grandstarchief3226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Slava class... Thanks for helping Lockheed to get the contract. lol.

  • @TheMemeDynamics
    @TheMemeDynamics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm here after Moskva went into a special anti-submarine operation in the Black Sea

  • @Steppy-qx9tq
    @Steppy-qx9tq 6 ปีที่แล้ว +570

    Why is the comment section full of “military geniuses”?

    • @Pwnzistor
      @Pwnzistor 6 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Everyone on the internet thinks they know everything.

    • @fate-csgoandmore6185
      @fate-csgoandmore6185 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      literally every other comment section

    • @chingghishan5707
      @chingghishan5707 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A JET THAT SHOOTS ANOTHER JET?!?!?
      OWO?!?!?!?

    • @lamao2504
      @lamao2504 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Surely they asked google...

    • @miksuko
      @miksuko 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Pwnzistor definitely not everyone. Kinda ironic that you say that and are wrong like that.

  • @Tobiasdg365
    @Tobiasdg365 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    1:22 The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    • @Matthias-fk5md
      @Matthias-fk5md 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genau so funktioniert das. Blöd nur daß die Dinger 9 mal langsamer sind als russische Raketen.

  • @AsterEmanon
    @AsterEmanon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    OK, this video needs remastered ASAP! Change the Slava into 055, or nobody will buy the LRASM!😂

  • @cooperfrench1
    @cooperfrench1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is the red force cruiser design based on the russian Atlant class? It looks just like the Moskva that was sunk by two Ukrainian ASMs last month.

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The cgi model is the muskrat, I mean moskva, at the bottom of the black sea

    • @MironSmithX
      @MironSmithX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The same hull number as "Moskva", 4:18

  • @scarblix7959
    @scarblix7959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    well, sinking the moskva with a u.s missile, this aged well...

    • @scarblix7959
      @scarblix7959 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @A Perpetual Guardsman with a flashlight based

  • @wyattchaplain275
    @wyattchaplain275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    funny how the Moskva shown here is now under the waves

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed it is very funny. Hopefully the same happens to china's type 003 if there's a conflict

  • @MrBucket9158
    @MrBucket9158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    new warthunder update looks fire!

    • @TheGlitch93
      @TheGlitch93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah bro, New smoke and exhaust effects

  • @zujiahuang8454
    @zujiahuang8454 5 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    new war thunder update looks great, I hope F-18E(LRASM) is not premium)))

    • @vnyggi621
      @vnyggi621 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @isrgntv _ Superhornet? Maybe in 20 years

  • @zhoubinjason
    @zhoubinjason 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Too bad, this missile has no chance to shoot it anymore

    • @Husker513
      @Husker513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ye , has not target anymore)

  • @하이코어
    @하이코어 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    성지순례 왔습니다 푸틴 족쳐주시고 우크라이나에 평화와 번영이 오길 기원합니다🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pray for Putin's quick and quiet passing in the night maybe

  • @Slycarlo
    @Slycarlo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    6 years in the making to sunk moskva lol

    • @TonyRios
      @TonyRios 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      wonder why this video was just recommended

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's called foresight

  • @samovarmaker9673
    @samovarmaker9673 6 ปีที่แล้ว +338

    I see more people talking about triggered Russians in the comment section than actual triggered Russians in the comment section.

    • @crumb6332
      @crumb6332 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I see more people talking about people talking about triggered Russians in the comments section than actual people talking about triggered Russians

    • @jesser5127
      @jesser5127 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's because Russia and China are the biggest enemies of the US. It is actually more so China than Russia.

    • @yourmom705
      @yourmom705 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      usa still thinks russia is the ussr

    • @valso
      @valso 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@yourmom705 Because it is. Communism still rules there.

    • @replysoon3216
      @replysoon3216 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@jesser5127 Russia is not an enemy of the United States. Stop spreading fake news from the Clinton News Network.

  • @loganmacneil3424
    @loganmacneil3424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Life imitates art, The Orc Ship "Moskva" has been sunk 😂

    • @12LoLproductions
      @12LoLproductions 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Moskva may be lost, but Varyag and Marshal Ustinov live on

    • @loganmacneil3424
      @loganmacneil3424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@12LoLproductions Not for long lol

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@12LoLproductions live on to also be lost to "a storm"

  • @iancoles1349
    @iancoles1349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Pick a stormy day with aid of targeting measure and let it fly. Up yours Ruski

  • @BLUEKOMMEH
    @BLUEKOMMEH 5 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    So what I've gotten from this video is that this missile system only works if the enemy possesses literally no functioning counter-measures whatsoever

    • @chucktowne
      @chucktowne 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @pepinillo fresco But its a long range anti-ship MISSILE (LRASM). Last time I checked, drones don't have explosive warheads and slam into objects on purpose. Drones carry missiles to do that for them. Idiot!

    • @chucktowne
      @chucktowne 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @pepinillo fresco someone doesn't understand its the internet where you cant see facial expressions. how the fuck am i to know you're joking if you don't use words like "kappa" or "j/k". HUH? Tell me smart guy!!!!!!!!! LUL

    • @punchmoi
      @punchmoi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      chucktowne israel destroyed advance chinese radar with

    • @chucktowne
      @chucktowne 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@punchmoi whats your point and how does that have anything to do with my comment?

    • @razrv3lc
      @razrv3lc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      They're almost undetectable by radar just like it's brother JASSM missiles. Its radar signature is like the size of a small bird and wouldn't be noticed by anti-air systems until it's too late to stop it.

  • @SunMoonBrothers
    @SunMoonBrothers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ukraine's neptune proved that it handle hostile surface action group as well

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Indeed it did. I don't think the neptune even costs 4 million dollars either. Slava ukraine

  • @crimsonstang
    @crimsonstang 8 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    Great, I'm sure Russia really liked this. A video demonstrating a new missile, and their ships were used.

    • @MrDuckie00
      @MrDuckie00 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Nobody messes with the U.S. Navy were coming for you

    • @monsta1359
      @monsta1359 8 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      Who cares, Russia does the same thing when doing a virtual demonstration.

    • @АлексейСуханов-х7з
      @АлексейСуханов-х7з 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      russian have some nukes tho

    • @BlakeC94
      @BlakeC94 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Russia does not. They will never be militarily better than the US. End of...

    • @crimsonstang
      @crimsonstang 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +The South 803 that's not entirely true.

  • @眼-h9o
    @眼-h9o 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    舷號121,莫斯科號
    結果被烏克蘭兩枚普通的巡航導彈擊中了

  • @cordellwordlaw3390
    @cordellwordlaw3390 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Lockheed Martin is the best and most important defense corporation that we have. And Skunkworks makes the sexiest aircraft to ever exist!

  • @laz001
    @laz001 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    These are cool. I might buy a couple

  • @greatwolf5372
    @greatwolf5372 7 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    All the Ruskies in the comments below got triggered.

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As above, so below (с)

    • @barracuda7018
      @barracuda7018 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Russia is the number one in the world in producing TROLLS ..!!!! besides that Russian weapons are shit ..
      www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/russian-missile-with-unlimited-range-crashed-after-only-22-miles.html?__source=twitter%7Cmain

    • @hoangquancao5330
      @hoangquancao5330 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@barracuda7018 uderestimate your opponent is always the first step for total defeat. lets start with some of them then.first up,the unbeatable B-52 got nailed by an army of farmer using underrated soviet anti air missle.Second,the M-72 LAW which said to far superior than the RPG-7 could not kill a PT-76 in while a RPG-7 still can penertrate an abram from the side.The USS Donald Cook incident on Black sea. And for the last,the M-16 in VietNam war compare to the AK-47

    • @barracuda7018
      @barracuda7018 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hoangquancao5330 B-52 was never considered unbeatable .. OK lets start dude.. the unbeatable Red Army left Afghanistan with their tails between their legs, completely defeated by a bunch of barefooted tribesmen .
      One single US made weapon ' STINGER ' destroyed a significant portion of the Red Airforce ..Another US made weapons probably the best of its kind in the world ' Apache helicopters with hellfire missiles' destroyed an entire army of T72 tanks in both Gulf wars .!
      Regarding RPG-7, lol you don't know a shit Abrams are the most combat proven tanks in the world and very few, if any lost to Russian made PRG-7 and compared to Chobham armour anything made in Russia looks pretty easy..
      M-16 versus AK-47 is another controversial issue.. M-16 is a high tech precision weapon extremely accurate vis-s-vis AK..
      Yes its 5.56 caliber is less powerful than 7.62X39 at close range but with a muzzle velocity of 1000 feet per second its more lethal in distances + 300 meter.
      Yes, America had/has a vested interest in how weapon systems perform against the then Soviet equipment. What better testing ground than real combat, against the real thing. The F-16 and F-15 sold to Israel, turned the Bekaa Valley in Libanon into the worlds largest collection of MIG parts in 1982 ( Bekaa valley aerial battles between ISD and Syria ) .
      ''uderestimate your opponent is always the first step for total defeat.''
      Generally speaking true but in the battlefields or in any war the US has never been defeated by any enemy armed with Russian weapons. Politics lost Vietnam , not the military everything tactically the US military wanted to achieve, they did.
      The US fought the NVA and Viet Cong which was completely annihilated in 1968 to a standstill. The effort to overtake South Vietnam was stopped. US battle operations stopped in 1972 with this status intact. Three years later, the invasion worked in the absence of US military .But strictly speaking, no one has ever actually militarily defeated the US in an entire war campaign.

    • @jwongss9287
      @jwongss9287 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      barracuda7018 absolutely!

  • @morflock4516
    @morflock4516 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    World War III with Russia? Fuck yeah!

  • @ericpaulgoldie
    @ericpaulgoldie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ukraine has already sunk the Moscova, only two ships remain, good hunting Lockheed and God speed.

  • @chrisf4268
    @chrisf4268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    After what the Ukrainians did our technology seems to be way too much overkill.😂😂😂🤣

    • @tracym8952
      @tracym8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but who else is going to make doom guy's equipment load out?