North London | Season 2 Episode 7 | Full Episode | Grand Designs UK

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • Kevin McCloud visits a couple who are looking to build their hi-tech modern house in a quiet north London street. Sarah and Coneyl have long dreamt of the perfect work and living space. Unable to find what they were looking for they decided to build their own. However the site they have found is situated in a predominately Edwardian street, and they have purchased the land without first obtaining planning permission.
    Visit ► GrandDesigns
    BAFTA winning Grand Designs is widely recognised as the pre-eminent series on modern architecture and design in Britain. It was originally conceived as a documentary series presented by designer and writer Kevin McCloud that takes us into the heart of life’s great unfolding human stories, where ordinary families risk all to experiment with architecture, technology, and their own lifestyle.
    Now in its 17th year, Grand Designs is one of Channel 4’s biggest returnable factual series and has grown into a global phenomenon, selling in over 100 territories. Apart from the TV series, the Grand Designs brand has also expanded to include books, a monthly magazine, architectural awards and a biannual exhibition, Grand Designs Live.

ความคิดเห็น • 98

  • @MontoyaBrandy
    @MontoyaBrandy ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Would love to see how many of these people in these old episodes still live in their homes.

  • @David-sb7vg
    @David-sb7vg ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The planners passed a white sparkly box! In an area with no other sparkly boxes…..How do things like that happen?? The architect was a classic…..jewelley and photography and the jewel box. Please!! What planet do these people come from? A lot of the dialogue reminded me of Acorn Antiques 😂

  • @freshfreenlovinit
    @freshfreenlovinit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The episode didn't show the fully completed house and them having moved in. I wonder if they actually did move in. MDF is a cheap product that I sure wouldn't want on my floors and walls. I would also prefer my glass wall not to have plastic tubing inside but use another method to make it private.

  • @carolinawren3594
    @carolinawren3594 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    no footings?

  • @1_aiartist_1001effects
    @1_aiartist_1001effects 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why they don't keep the bricks.. omg.. and sell.. omg

  • @juliawitt3813
    @juliawitt3813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think it was after the Great Fire of London they decided bricks were better.......I laughed when they said 20 weeks......that's builders for you.....😅

  • @gordonwinter4540
    @gordonwinter4540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    11 months to get planning permission?! I live in Canada and most building permits take 3 weeks! I hate the idea of some bureaucrat sitting in an office holding up your plans.

    • @reemssmeer-maar-dan-omgeke9028
      @reemssmeer-maar-dan-omgeke9028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Welcome to europe. Where space is limited. Where only big companies can build whatever whenever wherever

    • @VisionaryGardener
      @VisionaryGardener 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where in Canada?! As a former planner, it's very uncommon for a building permit for a full house construction to take only three weeks to get through the permit process now. In large cities it takes considerably longer. Certainly not 11 months, but also definitely not 3 weeks.

    • @gordonwinter4540
      @gordonwinter4540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VisionaryGardener Winnipeg. It was 10 years ago I built a house and the building permit was issued in a week

  • @DB-020
    @DB-020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    360p ? :-(

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว

      shot on a Sony Betacam, pre HD!

  • @pauljames9393
    @pauljames9393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Oh well everyone to their own taste ! ☹. To plonk that within edwardian villas is dreadfull .

  • @danglybit1
    @danglybit1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mike fm firm Tonkin Liu..Great work Mike.... Planning department are the new fascist head-quarters..

  • @alainstout
    @alainstout 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really don't like this tree in 2:51

  • @NSResponder
    @NSResponder หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is absolutely obscene that a pack of worthless apparatchiki get to decide what you can build on your own property.

  • @CovidConQuitTheCensorship
    @CovidConQuitTheCensorship 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate the presenter of this show. The British aren't great at choosing presenters for tv shows. They still slay it with comedians though

    • @gilessteve
      @gilessteve ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What is it about him that you don't like? There have been 23 seasons with him as presenter.

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol...he's still presenting the show, 25 years this year. He has less hair these days! lol.

    • @CovidConQuitTheCensorship
      @CovidConQuitTheCensorship ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gilessteve He's a bit ugly and his droll voice is boring, he just has no appeal to me. The show is a success because of the content, not because of him

  • @landsea7332
    @landsea7332 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Its a house to look at .
    Where are the rooms for human beings to live in , that create a sense of well being ?

  • @VisionaryGardener
    @VisionaryGardener 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Hate the mdf everywhere. That stuff doesn't hold edges and corners well. Over time, I doubt it has weathered especially well. Plus, the glue generally used in making the mdf is pretty terrible stuff that offgasses some pretty toxic chemicals. I wouldn't want to live in that.

    • @IandiBoats
      @IandiBoats 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I'm sure that house has rotted away by now. Horrible material selection and a flat roof. 👎🏾

    • @troismoutonsetuntigre5988
      @troismoutonsetuntigre5988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      this is my thought about so many of these houses. So many of them are just glass, concrete and mdf boxes

  • @billbreen4387
    @billbreen4387 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    None of the timber under the buildings was treated or waterproofed in anyway. The concern was that the brackets on top of the micro piles were not galvanized, the timber supports sitting on to of these brackets will rot much quicker than a mild steel bracket.
    From a structural point of view this building is badly designed from start to finish.

  • @silversteel6312
    @silversteel6312 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anyone else finding this couple bloody annoying? Not their fault. Some people are just naturally annoying. Annoying or not, they have themselves a lovely home.

  • @billbreen4387
    @billbreen4387 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Glue on timber does not work similar to a welded connection, welding steel you are connecting elements with the same tensile strength as the weld, with the timber if the joint fails it will be because of the relative weakness of the timber not the glue, particularly if the timber has not been treated and is rotting. This building is a structural disaster, and an expensive one at that, the owners should be worried

    • @TheForceHungerGames
      @TheForceHungerGames ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone wrote here in the remarks it’s just a shed and indeed when you look at the fabrication there is no breathing membrane walls where no installation comes which we do nowadays at seems like my shed which I have put 25 years ago in the garden also insulators and concreet floor

  • @billvandenbosch3017
    @billvandenbosch3017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Mdf, chipboard box
    No thanks cheap disaster in the long run

  • @swanvictor887
    @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I' sure they were both lovely people...but for me, this is the very definition of 'Pretentious Wankery'... The house is out of keeping with its environment and choice of materials is dodgy, to say the least.

  • @bluezauza
    @bluezauza ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I don't like it. It would be a perfect vacation home in a warm place but to live in honestly, It doesn't look comfortable.

  • @johnlighton7025
    @johnlighton7025 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The texture of the mdf? It's efffing mdf mate. Are you serious?

  • @andrewjones-productions
    @andrewjones-productions ปีที่แล้ว +31

    As a 31 year Japan resident, I see absolutely nothing whatsoever that espouses or even hints at anything traditional of Japan in this building. If there is anything at all, it is its long rectangular shape which would be known in Japan as a 'nagaya' (長屋), but even then it doesn't really hint at anything Japan.

  • @joyb5525
    @joyb5525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Stunning and timeless. Can Kevin revisit ?22 years later PLEASE

    • @amraceway
      @amraceway 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hopefully it has fallen down by then. I guess a white box is timeless however.

    • @mmau
      @mmau 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not so timeless: maps.app.goo.gl/VzKpT61AzoEmEB2K8

  • @BeardedNerdSE
    @BeardedNerdSE ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's still standing as of last year, but the finish of the building is looking really rough. It was looking pristine on the first Google Streetview pictures from 2008, but somewhere between then and 2012 it just went bad.

    • @michaeltutty1540
      @michaeltutty1540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not surprising. Air pollution will always darken a white material. It can't really be painted or the "sparkle" will be gone.

  • @MrMarkhall1
    @MrMarkhall1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm getting tired of gd, why does everything have to be so radical and pretentious? People burning money.

    • @TheWeightliftingTriathlete
      @TheWeightliftingTriathlete ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What would you rather watch? "Hi I'm Dave, a builder. I am building a three bedroom terraced house out of brick". 3 months later... "All done, no major issues".

    • @MrMarkhall1
      @MrMarkhall1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheWeightliftingTriathlete yeah

    • @Heavens-Humanaterian-Army
      @Heavens-Humanaterian-Army ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There money there choice

  • @rickiw8643
    @rickiw8643 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    These early shows had the nasty habit of following projects that didn't get finished in time for broadcast. That's like hearing a joke with no punchline and frustrating because I loved so many ideas here. Luckily, they learned to film over longer periods in later series to circumvent this problem.

  • @karlalton3170
    @karlalton3170 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Who thinks that small space under the whole build the Rats will live there ? I deff do 😂😂😂plus with no treatment on the underside of all that soft wood all of it will rot away in less than ten years 👎👎

  • @jennyc1846
    @jennyc1846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Planning taking 12 months.."we have to wait for them" WHY? You are paying the bill, its your house...make a noise people...they arent God they are shire/council office workers doing a 9-5 job and not very well it seems.
    Not a very attractive 'house', not to my liking, but not my house so my opinion doesnt really count eh? But I cannot understand the English love of concrete breeze blocks..you build toilets blocks out of them in Oz and MDF/chipboard we dont line our houses with it on floors and walls. we build cupboards and wardrobes with it and use it for backing products etc. its a very cheap basic product, I also wouldnt have thought it very waterproof or solid for long wearing areas like floors. I loved how the tradies wore masks when the insulation went in but the guy putting in the insulation didnt wear one and he was coated from head to foot in the paper dust, I wonder what his lungs are like now? Wasnt impressed with the 'tweaking' of the wooden panels. On the whole a very rough slipshod job if you ask me (which you didnt), certainly not what I would call a "Grand Design"

  • @russelprice6929
    @russelprice6929 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    £450 000 for a garden shed plus the land in 2000 🤯

  • @mcahny30
    @mcahny30 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Looks more like a Grand Nightmare

  • @mmau
    @mmau 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    After watching this twice I'm pretty convinced that everyone on this show is part of the Fast Show ensemble.

  • @jacquishepherd871
    @jacquishepherd871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sound proofing ! Non! Warmth! Rain on a flat roof! You will hear and feel everything you don’t want to.

  • @kevinchomyshyn523
    @kevinchomyshyn523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Grand designs junkie here- great to get another episode on the download 😀

  • @williamlulay7982
    @williamlulay7982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The house is beautiful, but what's with that ugly board fence along the open walkway - it looks like a temporary construction fence, and no one mentions anything about it! It wasn't part of the original design - no fence was - but the presence of some sort of fence that close to the walkway, WILL be part of the design.

  • @tonymillw6309
    @tonymillw6309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    They didn't build a home, they built an office.....

  • @ApexWoodworks
    @ApexWoodworks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It struck me that the joiner company who was hired to create the many panels didn't have the necessary experience to do the job. I was cringing watching them bashing away at the panels to make them fit. As a homeowner, I'd have been highly angry and very frustrated watching the construction as it proceeded at a relative snail's pace.

    • @MsYingyang2
      @MsYingyang2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree, one of the workers looked like he was 12 years old.

    • @ingreedheys1602
      @ingreedheys1602 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is what you call an apprentice. Everybody has to learn on the job to get expierience and the practice. No need to blame him or look down in the youth.....

  • @pskfry
    @pskfry ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this is an absolutely terrible house. imagine sitting in there at night, not being able to see out but everyone seeing easily in. horrific

  • @stevemiller7949
    @stevemiller7949 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This raises all kinds of questions that fascinate me. In general, I have come round to prefering traditional buildings . However, there have beeen many modern buildings that I admire and value, even if I would not want to spend lots of time in them. The question of when, where, and why to make windows transparent fascinates me. In general, I dislike blank graph paper street facades. Overall these people are charming and I would be happy to live next to this house. I think concerns about durability are valid. Time will tell. Thanks for this episode..🙂🙂❤️❤️💯💯

  • @davidbarnes4984
    @davidbarnes4984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This has to be the worst design of all time.....

  • @kattihatt
    @kattihatt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I think the space between the ground and the subflooring will result in mold issue, due to humidity under the house.

    • @richardwebb2348
      @richardwebb2348 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A depressing lack of skill.

  • @maryearll3359
    @maryearll3359 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The architect seems twee and eats word salad for lunch. He flies high in the sky in a dream. Sorry architect ❤ Pretentious build..

  • @threshingfloor8591
    @threshingfloor8591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hmm... that fire was a bit suspect!

  • @sherrylawrencelewis2544
    @sherrylawrencelewis2544 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Since, they have a home that was inherited why not update that than do this? Makes no sense. Why not save money? His inherited house looks bigger and has a garden. 😢😢😢

  • @emmanuelo.2471
    @emmanuelo.2471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If no one will say it I won't say it either. Sigh.

  • @anthonyscully2998
    @anthonyscully2998 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The water garden could have easily been a pool

  • @hispid1
    @hispid1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    1990s build with render over a wooden frame SCREAMS leaky building.

    • @barbarahaines7661
      @barbarahaines7661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I wonder how it ages

    • @Mr.Gui.monteiro
      @Mr.Gui.monteiro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@barbarahaines7661 1A Lincoln Rd, London N2 9DJ

    • @mmau
      @mmau 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mr.Gui.monteiro @barbarahaines7661 Wow, thought so. I love the concept but it was obvious that this will not age well. Looks so bad now, after only twenty odd years.

  • @TheForceHungerGames
    @TheForceHungerGames ปีที่แล้ว +1

    😂 Great design could have been cheap and solid but with all would have all methods of installation probably won’t last long.

  • @michaeltutty1540
    @michaeltutty1540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This place looks as shoddy as the old buildings that were there, only with less integtity. I'm surprised they got planning permission to build to the property line. Here in Ontario, unless bring built as a contiguous property, the new building must be set 1 metre inside of the property line. That would have cost them two metres of the width.
    The insulation choice was just STUPID. Over time the fire retardant degrades. In time you are left with shredded newspaper inside the walls, floors, and ceilings. Back in the 70s my parents had cellulose fibre insulation blown un the attic. By 10 years ago it was about st the point of forcing a major renovation to get it all out. We pulled some out, and it lit up like a christmas tree, and gave off noxious fumes.

  • @anteeker
    @anteeker หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it looks ridiculous in that neighborhood. Talk about an eyesore. Good architecture should blend in with its surroundings, not stick out like a sore thumb and scream LOOK AT ME!!!

  • @terrylegrosbisson1177
    @terrylegrosbisson1177 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how all that mdf and glue is looking now; 25yrs later?

  • @gilessteve
    @gilessteve ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I'm not sure who's more unfortunate, the owners for having to live in it or the neighbours for having to look at it.

    • @rosehavenfarm2969
      @rosehavenfarm2969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The neighbors are more unfortunate.
      Painted chipboard (smh). "A fixed budget is a very naive view."
      Those architects did it to themselves.

  • @amraceway
    @amraceway 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The original garage was much more attractive, not to mention the even more attractive house they sold to fund a bland box.

    • @davidbarnes4984
      @davidbarnes4984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I could not have put it better myself, its bloody awful

  • @victorvandenbelt2179
    @victorvandenbelt2179 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is an interesting build. Sure, pretentious. But why not? They are trying something new and original. It is so easy to dismis that. It is a very interesting site. Very deep and narrow. That alone inspires. It is beautiful.

  • @rtolias
    @rtolias 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for share

  • @mary-annnstednielsen5300
    @mary-annnstednielsen5300 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love this House… beautiful and modern!

  • @joep5153
    @joep5153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful!!!

  • @MrMarkhall1
    @MrMarkhall1 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is donkeys years old?!

  • @MR-tn5kv
    @MR-tn5kv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautiful.

  • @thegreatpyramidrevelations
    @thegreatpyramidrevelations ปีที่แล้ว

    Lovely music very emotive!

  • @jaomwtoptd
    @jaomwtoptd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Be nice when it's finished.

  • @gailjlyons2000
    @gailjlyons2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @fortalecimientosocial
    @fortalecimientosocial ปีที่แล้ว

    an adorable couple!!

  • @monsterebikes
    @monsterebikes ปีที่แล้ว

    Bloody adverts

    • @mmau
      @mmau 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get an ad blocker

  • @AnitaRonquest
    @AnitaRonquest 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love to watch your program, but I'm afraid I won't be able to do this anymore. Can't you edit the program and take out when you're guests use the name of GOD. his Name is Holy and should not be used in vain, PLEASE

    • @normanhathaway2275
      @normanhathaway2275 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh jesus christ!

    • @richardwebb2348
      @richardwebb2348 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Having no respect for an imaginary sky-god is a disgrace.

    • @MasterCedar
      @MasterCedar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which one of the many hundreds of gods would that be? Please close the door as you leave.

    • @crutherfordmusic
      @crutherfordmusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jesus bless you :)

  • @bjorn2970
    @bjorn2970 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anti climatic ending. We want to see the finished house.