Salovey and Mayer's approach to understanding and categorizing Emotional Intelligence is not well known. But it does make a lot of sense and will help you to think about EI from another point of view. Thank you for watching Please support the channel and our free content. Like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell so TH-cam knows to let you know when I produce more videos. And, for maximum support, use the $ Thanks button, under the video, to make a small donation with a highlighted comment.
I'm currently revising for a coaching diploma and am finding Dr Mike's videos invaluable as they are clear, succinct and interesting. He is so adept at understanding and presenting key information
Just a small point. I knew Peter Salovey in grad school. His name is pronounced Salovey, with the accent on the 1st syllable. It’s shortened from Saloveichik. He comes from a well-known rabbinical family.
To use colloquial language, this was bloody amazing. Succinct and yet so informative. Salient points all in with comparison to boot. I LOVED it. Thanks so much. Really helped.
Great series of videos but I don't get the distinction TBH. Goleman's pillars are the core abilities, S&M's are the skillset in how to use them. They’re implicit in his five pillars. If you’re in possession of these attributes, then theirs are just a description of what you’re doing when you’re actioning them. Perceiving = Self Awareness and Empathy (in which perceiving is implicit) Understanding = Empathy (of which understanding is a primordial form) Managing = Self regulation and social skills (duh!) Using = social skills (and motivation, the 5th) Theirs are the “doing” and I can’t see that they stand alone without his to back them up. How do you perceive? Oh, you use self-awareness and empathy. Managing? Great, how do you do that? Oh, you use self-regulation and social skills. Etc. Of course academics like their model - it gives them more to write about when he's basically sewn it up already. What am I missing? Apart from actually reading their papers of course!
I think you have said it yourself, but let me rephrase. Salvey and Mayer described four skill-sets we need to be fully emotionally intelligent. Goleman articulated four or five uses that we put these skills to, to demonstrate emotional intelligence. Think of a grid - on one axis (vertical, say), we list the four (S&M) skill-sets. On the other (Horizontal), the four or five expressions of emotional intelligence (Goleman) In the intersections, we have the applications of the skills to the outcomes (as you have tried to illustrate. So, each articulation describes one aspect of the full picture. They are 'orthogonal' (non-overlapping) descriptions of emotional intelligence. They have different uses and some find one more compelling than the other. Because Goleman is a skilled writer and published a book that became a best-seller, his articulation is by far the better know. This does not make it the better. Unfortunately, I am not a trained psychologist with expertise in this area. So I cannot comment on which has the stronger application in different field. There are many cases of alternate articulations of the same basic knowledge. The existence of one does not make another less valid. And understanding more than one, increases the depth of our understanding of all. In my experience, there are many martial arts: they each draw on a subset of use-cases and manipulations of joints and momentum. Because aikido works, it does not make kung fu useless. Even if there are (necessary) overlaps. And there is bound to be overlap because both work on the same human body plan. So, both Goleman's and Salovey & Mayer's models work on the same human psychology and neurology.
Done: 1. Ethos: the Importance of Character in Influence & Persuasion - th-cam.com/video/QRlhd9hJm_s/w-d-xo.html 2. The Core of Influence & Persuasion: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos - Character, Reason, and Emotion - th-cam.com/video/GV0TGdhc1kw/w-d-xo.html
Salovey and Mayer's approach to understanding and categorizing Emotional Intelligence is not well known. But it does make a lot of sense and will help you to think about EI from another point of view.
Thank you for watching
Please support the channel and our free content. Like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell so TH-cam knows to let you know when I produce more videos.
And, for maximum support, use the $ Thanks button, under the video, to make a small donation with a highlighted comment.
I'm currently revising for a coaching diploma and am finding Dr Mike's videos invaluable as they are clear, succinct and interesting. He is so adept at understanding and presenting key information
That's great to hear! Thank you, Sophie.
Just a small point. I knew Peter Salovey in grad school. His name is pronounced Salovey, with the accent on the 1st syllable. It’s shortened from Saloveichik. He comes from a well-known rabbinical family.
Thank you
To use colloquial language, this was bloody amazing. Succinct and yet so informative. Salient points all in with comparison to boot. I LOVED it. Thanks so much. Really helped.
Wow, thank you!
Great series of videos but I don't get the distinction TBH. Goleman's pillars are the core abilities, S&M's are the skillset in how to use them. They’re implicit in his five pillars. If you’re in possession of these attributes, then theirs are just a description of what you’re doing when you’re actioning them.
Perceiving = Self Awareness and Empathy
(in which perceiving is implicit)
Understanding = Empathy
(of which understanding is a primordial form)
Managing = Self regulation and social skills
(duh!)
Using = social skills (and motivation, the 5th)
Theirs are the “doing” and I can’t see that they stand alone without his to back them up. How do you perceive? Oh, you use self-awareness and empathy. Managing? Great, how do you do that? Oh, you use self-regulation and social skills. Etc. Of course academics like their model - it gives them more to write about when he's basically sewn it up already.
What am I missing? Apart from actually reading their papers of course!
I think you have said it yourself, but let me rephrase.
Salvey and Mayer described four skill-sets we need to be fully emotionally intelligent.
Goleman articulated four or five uses that we put these skills to, to demonstrate emotional intelligence.
Think of a grid - on one axis (vertical, say), we list the four (S&M) skill-sets. On the other (Horizontal), the four or five expressions of emotional intelligence (Goleman)
In the intersections, we have the applications of the skills to the outcomes (as you have tried to illustrate.
So, each articulation describes one aspect of the full picture. They are 'orthogonal' (non-overlapping) descriptions of emotional intelligence. They have different uses and some find one more compelling than the other.
Because Goleman is a skilled writer and published a book that became a best-seller, his articulation is by far the better know. This does not make it the better. Unfortunately, I am not a trained psychologist with expertise in this area. So I cannot comment on which has the stronger application in different field.
There are many cases of alternate articulations of the same basic knowledge. The existence of one does not make another less valid. And understanding more than one, increases the depth of our understanding of all. In my experience, there are many martial arts: they each draw on a subset of use-cases and manipulations of joints and momentum. Because aikido works, it does not make kung fu useless. Even if there are (necessary) overlaps. And there is bound to be overlap because both work on the same human body plan. So, both Goleman's and Salovey & Mayer's models work on the same human psychology and neurology.
@@ManagementCourses thank you
Thank u for simplifying it ✨
You’re welcome 😊
Thank you sir ...for this video ❤❤
You're welcome.
thank you....
You're most welcome
Please post more videos about
- Ethos (credibility
- Aristotle ethos-pathos-logos
Done:
1. Ethos: the Importance of Character in Influence & Persuasion
- th-cam.com/video/QRlhd9hJm_s/w-d-xo.html
2. The Core of Influence & Persuasion: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos
- Character, Reason, and Emotion - th-cam.com/video/GV0TGdhc1kw/w-d-xo.html
I will become dr
Good for you!