Konnte diesen Augen und Ohrenschmaus live in Aktion sehen 😊 Mein Chef hat mir sogar gesagt, ich soll früher nach Hause fahren um mir das ausgiebig anzuschauen 😅
This machine is amazing. There was one in our town at the end of last June when our overhead parking caved into our mall. Words cannot describe it's power, just awesome
The reason they don't blow it up might be the high density of steel and the thickness of the walls. Regular buildings usually do not bear loads as Silos do. So they can be made to collapse. this Silo has no levels lie regular buildings do so that makes the drilling of holes for explosives more complicated.
Seems like the building was in the middle of no where. Some explosives and that job would have been done before the crane even showed up to assemble the CAT. Much cheaper.
+MrSigDan Building implosion prep can take anywhere from 4-20 weeks (not including clean up). Sure the implosion is over in seconds, but do you honestly think it took more time for the UHD to take this thing down? No.
+lytken maybe, if you just wanted it down.... BUT that building is steel reinforced concrete. at least in norway we use the crushing jaws of the escavator to seperate steel and concrete.. blastng it might have brouht it down a bit, but you still had to use maskines to get the steel out of the concrete.
that is true, and it is used all over the world for that, but from the tons of documentaries i have watch it would be better to blow it down and the steel is no problem ad all, and then use the jaws to separate the steel from the concrete after it has come down to ground level + i bet it would be faster, better, and cheaper for who ever pay for it :)
+lytken yes i have been using explosives on steel reinforsed concrete but to demolish a bigger building thats not heavy enough to crumble if you blast a few beams, you must use quite big amount of explosives + drill lots of holes. also in the video around 1:20 you see a church quite near the old factory they are demolishing. so my guess is that they arent allowd to use explosives ORE they are proud of their new maskine and want to demonstrate it. hehe
A wrecking ball would have been 10 times faster and most likely 20 times cheaper. The cost and efficiency plus labor don't look good for this application and must have taken a few tokens from any profit. I think the only one walking away with a smile would be the operator!
+2hands full from where you are? maybe you are not from germany and in germany is many times blowing not alow so you have to think aboud how you will demolish.
Beautiful machine
Konnte diesen Augen und Ohrenschmaus live in Aktion sehen 😊 Mein Chef hat mir sogar gesagt, ich soll früher nach Hause fahren um mir das ausgiebig anzuschauen 😅
Die Maschine live zu erleben ist wirklich ein Erlebnis!
nice mini excavator
Klasse dieser Cat.............
Bite size chunks, how nice.
This machine is amazing.
There was one in our town at the end of last June when our overhead parking caved into our mall. Words cannot describe it's power, just awesome
So that is what a modern Dinosaur looks like. When it eats from a tall Tree. Thx. Smoke.
I wonder how thirsty is this monster machine... Nice vid dude.
Bloody nice piece of kit.
maschiene is gut von welchem planten kommt die
1.PETER DUNKEL RC
now that is what you call a machine
The reason they don't blow it up might be the high density of steel and the thickness of the walls. Regular buildings usually do not bear loads as Silos do. So they can be made to collapse. this Silo has no levels lie regular buildings do so that makes the drilling of holes for explosives more complicated.
chorknator for a fraction of the cost of this thing, I'm sure they could easily just get more explosives to compensate for the thick walls.
What a beast, great vid.
It just goes to show you how strong reinforced concrete is. Wrecking balls tend to get caught up into the the rebar thats tied together .
it looks like a crane
It has two exhaust mouths on the side.
die ankippbare kabine ist bei fast allen longfrontgeräten standart
what machine is rocking with arregatet.
dam
can that guy see all the way up there or does he have a video camera mounted somewhere on the boom to see what hes doing ?
+Jason G he can see everything but there is no camera on the boom
+DREAM MACHINES im pretty sure he has a cam
I spoke to the operator personally: no cam! Are you more intelligent than the operator?!?!
+DREAM MACHINES ah he probaly eats a lots of carrots
Seems like the building was in the middle of no where. Some explosives and that job would have been done before the crane even showed up to assemble the CAT. Much cheaper.
MrSigDan impossible to use explosives due to railroad tracks and buildings nearby!
MrSigDan I am sure they checked all the possibilities first, probably houses near buy or something..
I totally agree.
+MrSigDan Building implosion prep can take anywhere from 4-20 weeks (not including clean up). Sure the implosion is over in seconds, but do you honestly think it took more time for the UHD to take this thing down? No.
👍👍
its the new way of putting stuff out in space, who needs rockets, just use this to place satellites
I see it does more with the large tool.
Does the large tool operate the machine then?
this building is heawy reinforced with steel: such built need a complicated blow process, i think it's much cheaper with the machine...
probably cost millions just to move it from 1 job to another.
Dave Bainard millions come back to earth please probably cost you a couple of grand to move it
seems like it would be cheaper and faster
rusch kraantechniek....sag ich mal ;-)
GENIAL!!! :D
awesome machine but would it not be better and cheaper to to implode the building
+lytken maybe, if you just wanted it down.... BUT that building is steel reinforced concrete. at least in norway we use the crushing jaws of the escavator to seperate steel and concrete.. blastng it might have brouht it down a bit, but you still had to use maskines to get the steel out of the concrete.
that is true, and it is used all over the world for that, but from the tons of documentaries i have watch it would be better to blow it down and the steel is no problem ad all, and then use the jaws to separate the steel from the concrete after it has come down to ground level + i bet it would be faster, better, and cheaper for who ever pay for it :)
+lytken yes i have been using explosives on steel reinforsed concrete but to demolish a bigger building thats not heavy enough to crumble if you blast a few beams, you must use quite big amount of explosives + drill lots of holes. also in the video around 1:20 you see a church quite near the old factory they are demolishing. so my guess is that they arent allowd to use explosives ORE they are proud of their new maskine and want to demonstrate it. hehe
hahaha i will go with the last one regarding the new machine LOL
any chance i could borrow it for the weekend,got a extension to demo
what is the price tag one one of those
millions. they're built to order
not really getting the full benifit of the machine if the building is halfdown, better vid if weed seen it from the start with boom fully extended
Built here in the states with pride!
This special machine was manufactured in the Netherlands
i'm guessing if a guy was nearsighted he would'nt be able to do this job :)
brewse64 some of them have cameras
brewse64 Only with a pair of binocculars lol
I can't understand why they didn't blow that buliding to the ground instead, must be cheaper?
A wrecking ball would have been 10 times faster and most likely 20 times cheaper. The cost and efficiency plus labor don't look good for this application and must have taken a few tokens from any profit. I think the only one walking away with a smile would be the operator!
+2hands full wrecking balls are not allowed in many countries due to safety reasons
+2hands full from where you are? maybe you are not from germany and in germany is many times blowing not alow so you have to think aboud how you will demolish.
+2hands full I totally disagree with you before you put anything on the job ,everything is priced up they now what they are doing
Rediculous . Normally using tnt to demolition .. I'm agreed with advertising this monster .
why not tnt?
There's a bigger one in Japan or maybe it's China I've run a 5110 there huge but not the biggest in the world
caus we needed faster ways to destroy the planet