Is The Suzuki Swift Fuel Efficient? Pt2.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.พ. 2024
- So, In today’s video we’re carrying out a more realistic test of the Suzuki Swift’s fuel efficiency, and it’s been very interesting. I actually realised that I have never seen a number above 5L/100km in terms of average fuel consumption on this car, and I’m not sure what to think of that.
Overall the Swift is decently efficient, depending on how one uses or drives it, certain conditions make it horrible at consumption levels such as using the aircon and or driving around town.
Thanks For Watching
Emba
Follow Me On Instagram: ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Instagram: emba_kub?h... - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
I have a Suzuki dzire and in town I get 5.5l/km and on open road I get 4,8 and you are right the Suzuki is not fuel efficient as the Vw , the Suzuki also chows more fuel if the aircon is on .
That's definitely what I've noticed
We appreciate an honest review 👌🏾
Always!
Great video as always. To get an accurate measure of fuel consumption though, try calculating at the pump. Fill it up to the brim (37 Liters in the case of the Swift) drive for a set number of kilometers, say 200km for example, then fill it up again to the brim, divide the distance traveled by the amount of fuel it took then you'll have the accurate reading. I've found that the on board computer tends to be off by 1 or 2 litres when measuring fuel consumption, in essence you could be doing 7.5l/100km and it'll report 5.5l/100km or vice versa.
Great suggestion 🙏🏽
Nice one please can we get more content
I drive a Suzuki 1.2L GL Average 5.4L/100km I upgraded to 15 Inch Rims on 195/45/R15 tyres 🛞 I think it’s because am always hard on the accelerator 😅
😂😂😂well done sir
Nice video, can you do the same withbthe vitara brezza, i suspect the computer give less consumption than what it is really consuming.
Hi Man. Can You please do a review of Nissan Magnite🙏🏾
The reason the swift is less efficient compared to the Golf it's because the engine gets strained on slopes and inclines as a result, it ends up consuming more fuel. For long distances it will be cheaper traveling a bigger engine. This applies to all small engines, 1.2s and the 1.0s, they are underpowered and unfortunately not turbocharged
Very good point
This car is so good man, so in your opinion bro how good is the sound system there ?
For this sort of car it’s really decent, some songs sound really good, some not so much because sometimes the panels rattle from bass
Well done, insightful video. Ka golola Lenyenye. 🎉 I learn a lot about vehicles and their performance from your videos
Thank you so much, I’m glad you do🙏🏽
I dont think the trip computer is misreading the fuel consumption. On my opinion this car is more efficient when you doing short trips in an around town. I remember your first video. It shows some impressive fuel range, and also i think you don't have heavy foot. Some avarage way about 4.8L/100
Well I guess I don’t have a heavy foot😂
Remember that the golf has a much larger fuel tank. Compare the fuel consumption to see which one is more fuel efficient, not distance to empty
I did mention that in the video, 13L difference…
But still the Golf is a lot more efficient, you an travel faster, and longer, and still have a lot of fuel left…
@@embakubmotoring Okay I must have missed that details, my apologies. Maybe Suzuki cooks the numbers a bit on their on board computer 😅
@@vincentmothapa2421 I don’t wanna say that, but you never know 😅
@@embakubmotoring Understood 😂
EMBA, can you do a similar review with fronx.
Quick one, is the Swift, Baleno and fronx built on one shasis/platform?
Not the Swift, but the Baleno and Fronx are built on the same chassis…
It’ll be challenging to do a similar video on those cars Because I don’t have access to them