2021 Nissan Kicks | MotorWeek Road Test

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 140

  • @dohc1067
    @dohc1067 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Honestly, even looking at the camera 📷 angle as the car is accelerating you can tell the poor car is struggling to get up to speed. Beyond the powertrain, the car has great braking performance, youthful styling, decent interior, alot of features, and overall attractive pricing. It will sell. I like the blue with the floating roof. As always John Davis does an excellent job.

  • @LearnAboutFlow
    @LearnAboutFlow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Sounds like this could be a great basis for an S-ER model with manual and upgraded springs, which of course will never happen.
    That said, its 60 - 0 braking distance is what used to be in supercar territory. Amazing how far technology has come, for once in a good way.

    • @allentoyokawa9068
      @allentoyokawa9068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      still is kind of super car territory braking

    • @LearnAboutFlow
      @LearnAboutFlow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thirdstar9255 Um, well, I was talking ONLY about the brakes but I guess your reading comprehension . . . isn't. I don't disagree about cars being soulless today.

  • @fuffthebucks7266
    @fuffthebucks7266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    when the market cools and these are like 3-5 years old this would be a good first car or winter beater. I'm worried about Nissan CVTs though as far as reliability

  • @EricFortuneJr.
    @EricFortuneJr. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    A manual NA 2.5 would’ve been fun, more reliable too.

  • @tedschmitt178
    @tedschmitt178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Kicks is NOT, I repeat NOT a crossover due to no AWD/4WD option. This thing is just a hatchback.

  • @danr4197
    @danr4197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I test drove this about 4 months ago despite the CVT. I REALY liked it!

  • @toronado455
    @toronado455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I like the Kicks. The SR with the Premium Package is a nice economy car with its Prima-Tex™ seats.

  • @user-cj4sm8hv9y
    @user-cj4sm8hv9y 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pumped-Up Kicks

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Foster The People
      Look up " Pumped Up Kicks (Official Video) "

  • @scott8919
    @scott8919 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I still wish they kept the Juke, even with the Kicks here.

    • @LearnAboutFlow
      @LearnAboutFlow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I never understood why people hated the Juke. It drove well, looked cool, and did everything you needed.

    • @aidaaliten8817
      @aidaaliten8817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@LearnAboutFlow your the first person to call the Nissan juke cool
      For me it kinda looks 🐸

    • @LearnAboutFlow
      @LearnAboutFlow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@aidaaliten8817 Yup, I think 99% of people think that. I still think it was cool looking, especially in the Nismo models.
      And if you compare it to many of today's 'gaping fish' model design (Lexus, etc), I think it looks even better, lol.

    • @aidaaliten8817
      @aidaaliten8817 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🥉

    • @aidaaliten8817
      @aidaaliten8817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LearnAboutFlow Nissan quashai looks better than juke

  • @sailordave1000
    @sailordave1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would like to see a comparison test between the Kicks and Hyundai Venue since they are direct competitors. Both are based upon their brand’s subcompact sedan platform. Both are affordable city car type crossovers with good fuel economy. They can make for a good vehicle to send a kid off to college.

  • @rabit818
    @rabit818 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Nissan needs another Juke. Totally different, daring and quirky. A love it or hate it and memorable.

    • @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961
      @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes i hope people dont call it funny

    • @aayonce4
      @aayonce4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Omg I loved the juke ! It’s so unique I’m looking to get a manual one in the next few years

    • @basshead.
      @basshead. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nope, Nissan needs to start making reliable cars again.

    • @rabit818
      @rabit818 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@basshead. My friend and I were driving around town in his well maintained Nissan minivan. And the side mirror just went “unglued/unscrewed” from the door without hitting a pot hole.

    • @Niro.C
      @Niro.C 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nissan has a new Juse since 2020 and it is sild in Europe with a 1.0L turbo 3 cylider engine (117hp) and a 7-speed dual clutch gearbox. Too bad it is not offered with Renault-Nissan's 1.33L turbo gem of an engine.

  • @EzMDr
    @EzMDr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The engine is from Renault and Jatco CVT, good luck. what a dreadful combination?

  • @ubiased23
    @ubiased23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Still faster than my 1996 4 cylinder toyota camry. Which is 11.5 0-60 but reliable as hell.

    • @brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175
      @brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My 2004 jetta was even slower than that I once f
      Raced an ice cream truck and struggled to pass he probably wasn’t even racing but I was!

    • @ubiased23
      @ubiased23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175 was it a diesel?

    • @brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175
      @brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ubiased23 no

    • @Kylehoulihan
      @Kylehoulihan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175 2.slo?

  • @kmckenzie2461
    @kmckenzie2461 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I purchased a brand new 2023 Nissan Kicks SR with Premium Package in Boulder Gray Pearl back in October of 2023 and I have to say I am thoroughly impressed with my new Nissan. The longer I own it the more I appreciate how good of a car it really is for the price. I find more and more little things it does and I tell you its good all kind of features especially on the safety front. It does everything so well and is just a really well rounded vehicle that is an unbeatable value especially in features per dollar. I live my Kicks!
    Comfort:
    The front seats are so comfortable and just hold you perfectly and support your back and legs so well (I am 5’11”). I usually have issues with seats not supporting my thighs because I have long legs. Not in the Kicks, its seats support the back of my thighs perfectly. The 2024 Altima SR I had drove had a much shorter bottom seat cushion it seemed and my thighs were not supported and were up off the seat at a weird angle no matter how I adjusted the power seat. Now the Sentra SR seats were excellent and had a long supportive bottom seat cushion and were even a tad better than the Kicks seats. But anyway the seats in the Kicks I love and are perfect to me lol. Also the multicolor Primatex Synthetic Leather material used on the top trim SR with Premium Package is so durable lookibg and feeling with such a sporty flare. You can tell they will hold up very well compared to true leather and they have not sagged, creased or got shiny at all like a lot of real leathers do on the seat bolster getting in and out. My 2021 Mitsubishi Mirage SE top trim that I traded on this Kicks had neat premium plaid cloth seats with leatherette bolsters and after 2.5 years of owning it the seats had not one sign of wear, no creasing, no shininess and no sagging and in the top trim Mirage SE the material is very thick and durable like this Kicks. The front area in the Kicks is so roomy with tons of legroom and I and headroom its crazy. I keep the bottom part of the seat in its half way back/forth position and the pump action height adjustment I keep in the lowest position. If I slide the driver seat all the way back I cannot push the pedals thats how much seat travel they give lol. However it slides back soooo far that it eliminates rear leg room lol. I have long legs and am almost 6 ft and in my seating position I can sit behind my self with room to spare. The rear seats are just as comfortable and you sit very high looking over the front seats and like I said I still have a ton of head and leg room behind my driving position. I know some cars have what they call stadium seating in the rear but I have never experienced it as much as in the Kicks as you sit very high and way above the front seats and if you get car sick (I hate riding in the rear seat) it really helps because you do not feel like your in the back seat and are up high and not claustrophobic feeling at all. Even still there is a ton of headroom. Back in the front seat like I said I keep the height adjustment in its lowest position like I do in all vehicles I own and its perfect for me and leaves a ton of headroom above my head like several inches. Everything in the Kicks is just placed in easy reach and is so easy to use and understand. It fits me perfectly.
    Cargo:
    The cargo area is huge for such a small vehicle at 169 inches long. It has 25 cubic feet and can hold so much more than you realize and even the sides of the cargo area are carpeted which keeps the car quieter and prevents getting those ugly scratch marks. It also has 2 built in bag holders and a very heavy duty solid cargo cover. The cargo cover only comes standard when you get the top trim SR and add the $1,400.00 Premium Package which I did.
    Features:
    Where do I begin. This top trim SR with the $1,400.00 Premium Package is loaded for such a small car and comes in under $26,000.00. It has things like rear parking sensors, 360 surround view cameras, rear automatic emergency braking (rare in vehicles under $40K) for parking and works damn well, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, 8 speaker Bose audio system with 2 neat speakers built into the drivers seat headrest, 8 inch audio touch screen, 7 inch half digital gauge cluster screen that does all kind of things, led headlights, led tail lights, led fog lights, 17 inch alloy wheels, push button start, remote start with intelligent climate control that heats or cools the car and even heats your seats and steering wheel and it bases what it does on the outside temp, auto digital climate control, auto up down drive and front passenger windows, nissan Connect Telematics, super sharp Primatex synthetic leather seats that are light gray and charcoal with orange accent stitching, primatex dash pad, rear seat occupancy alert reminder and so much more. This thing is loaded for under $26,000.00 with features reserved for more expensive vehicles.i absolutely love its 8 speaker Bose personal audio system it sounds amazing and looks cool too with the driver seat headrests. The 360 surround view camera system with multiple views makes parking a snap too. I just love everything about my Kicks.
    Safety Features:
    Wow does this Kicks have the safety features and they work very well and do not miss a beat. Lane departure warning with haptic steering wheel, forward collision alert and auto braking, rear collision alert and auto braking, rear cross traffic alert, pedestrian detection, blind spot warning, auto high beams, led lighting systems, park assist, 360 surround view camera, dynamic control module for engine braking (SR only) - ride control and pitch (SR only) - handling with active trace and yaw control (SR only), abs, electric parking brake with auto hold feature, stability and traction control, digital tire pressure display for all 4 tires, easy tire fill with horn alert, radar adaptive cruise control, Nissan Telematics with SOS button and automatic crash notification, 10 airbags, zero gravity seats, security system and more!!!
    Driving:
    The Kicks really impresses me with how it drives. Another thing that really impresses me is its sound build quality as the vehicle has absolutely no squeaks or rattles even when super cold out and just has a solid feel. This CUV does not have a wallow type ride like our Eclipse Cross SUV does to the point there is to much movement that can make you sick. The Kicks is planted and firm yet has a great ride and handles bumps and all very well. I know the SR has the dynamic module thing for ride control adjustments, torque vectoring using the brakes and active engine braking using the CVT and engine but I am not sure if the suspension on the SR (sporty trim lol) is any different than in the S or SV trim. But the point is it has a good ride which a lot of online reviews agree with. Thats impressive for its size and price. Like I said the Kicks drives with a very solid feel and has great steering thats very direct and communicative and very well controlled. It has a nice ride height too with 7 inches of ground clearance which is pretty good for a small CUV. The driving position and visibility are amazing and it had a huge windshield and huge windows all around. As far as power goes it does pretty good and has a very low reving engine while cruising and becomes very quiet. Also its idle is very quiet. The windshield wipers front and rear work great and the driver side wiper is huge and sweeps like every inch of the windshield for maximum visibility. The rear wiper has 2 settings which is nice, an intermittent speed and a constant steady speed. It gets great MPGs too and does better than most all in its class. On the highway it can get close to 40 mpg which is amazing.
    CVT (JF015E-RE0F11B Jatco CVT 7)
    Engine (HR16DE -1.6L 4 Cylinder)
    The CVT which everyone knows about and complains is a major sore point for Nissan unfortunately. I know they had issues years back on past generation Jatco CVTs but they have improved tremendously. My last 3 Mitsubishi Mirages (2015, 2017, 2021) all had the same Jatco CVT-7 as the Nissan Kicks and I had no issues. In fact our last 7 vehicle’s have all had Jatco produced CVTs with no issues and our 2019 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross SEL Touring with S-AWC is 5 years old now and we have had no issues with its Jatco sourced CVT. I really like the programming of the CVT-7 in the Nissan Kicks and it really feels neat. It drives like a true geared automatic transmission with simulated fake shift points that make the car feel more responsive and fun. I love it. Also on the SR you have the active engine braking, active trace control and active ride management. As for the engine in the Kicks it is the HR16DE and has been around since like 2004! Of course over the years it has had several major updates and little tweaks but is still the same basic engine. I personally like that as it’s a simple older style proven powertrain. I have no issues with that.

    • @aamirqz
      @aamirqz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for the thorough review. I took my 82 year old mother to the local auto show earlier this week because I wanted to find a vehicle that was easy for her to get in/out of (I drive her around a lot to run errands). The two best vehicles in that regard were the Kicks, followed by the Subaru Forester.
      I currently drive a 2010 Camry LE which is getting to be increasingly difficult for my mom to get in/out of because the passenger seat is low and not height adjustable. I want something with a higher seating position as well, so the Kicks and Forester are appealing to me also.
      I hope to test drive both vehicles within the next couple of months. The Kicks is quite a bit more affordable, as long as you stick with the S or SV trim level. The SR with the Premium Package is nicely equipped, but I feel it's a bit too pricey compared to other vehicles at the $27K price point.

    • @kmckenzie2461
      @kmckenzie2461 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aamirqz Both are great choices. If you go with the Kicks do yourself a favor and get the SV it has sooo many more features over the S for not very much more that will make things much better for her like the remote start, larger 8 inch touch screen vs 7 inch, half 7 inch digital half analog gauge cluster screen for all kinds of info and digital speedometer and safety features where the S has 2 basic gauges, nicer full length center console and arm rest storage bin, alloy wheels vs hubcaps, and a nicer interior. Its worth the extra. I understand the SR Premium is a little pricier yes. You get what fits the needs you are looking for and the amount you are looking to spend. Cars have gotten way to expensive. You say you have a 2010 Camry and I must say Camrys are great cars, super solid and reliable. My 83 year old Grandma who still works 5 days a week has a 2003 Toyota Camry LE she bought brand new in 2003 and still drives it every day with well over 150,000 miles lol. They are good cars.
      Subarus are great vehicles too and I have 2 friends who own a 2021 Subaru Outback Limited and one owns a 2019 Subaru Impreza Sport and they have been good vehicles. The Forester is a definitely pricer than a Kicks but its because its the next size class up. I say drive both and see what fits both hers and your likes. I drove a new Nissan Altima SR and absolutely loved it but being 5’11” and having long legs when I went to get out it was so low I felt so awkward getting out like a daddy long legger lol. So I get the to low thing and the Kicks is at the perfect slide in height not to high not to low just right.

  • @jimmyjimjims7483
    @jimmyjimjims7483 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They call it the Kicks cuz you gonna be kicking it quite a bit once the CVT cooks itself at 80k miles lol

  • @Dave--FkTheDeepstate
    @Dave--FkTheDeepstate 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    0-60 in 10s !

    • @allentoyokawa9068
      @allentoyokawa9068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and?

    • @Dave--FkTheDeepstate
      @Dave--FkTheDeepstate 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@allentoyokawa9068 If you don't realize the issue, if it's not obvious, then it doesn't matter. To you.
      🙂
      Hint: the average new car takes about 7.5s

    • @goclunker
      @goclunker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allentoyokawa9068 and you’re poor.

    • @busman7228
      @busman7228 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Entry level cars average about 10 seconds.

    • @goclunker
      @goclunker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@busman7228 In 1993

  • @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly
    @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The Nissan Juke was a lot quirkier in my opinion.

    • @jbar_85
      @jbar_85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is a understatement lol!

    • @nodak81
      @nodak81 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For most people, quirky = lame. Nissan is in the business of selling cars to the masses, not pleasing a handful of weirdos that want a weirdo car.

  • @1vw4me
    @1vw4me 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jatco CVT = Garbage Can on wheels. Can't believe Nissan hasn't learned their lesson yet.

    • @austinfrazier7325
      @austinfrazier7325 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree. There must be some kind of financial kick back from Jatco.

  • @tjj5337
    @tjj5337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love mine.. lots of nice features and great gas mileage

  • @TheCOZ
    @TheCOZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I want an orange one. I'll rebadge it KIX.

  • @PhillyDee215
    @PhillyDee215 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    💥Very nice for a entry level car😎

  • @michaelhoard9548
    @michaelhoard9548 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had the base model as a rental for a week, absolutely hated it. I understand it's suppose to be a cheaper compact vehicle but please put some type of different martials inside to break up a the black plastic, maybe some silver around the window switches or door handles, anything would look better. The radio and sounded good and the infotainment was ok. Other than that the car was terrible. It was under powered and uncomfortable. The only arm rest was a folding one tacked onto the driver's seat but it was at an angle so my arm kept slipping off of it. The auto high beams (odd to auto high beams on a base model) would take a good 15-20 seconds to go back to high after a car passed. Just an all around terrible car. I would buy a used Corolla or something similar.

  • @ramoncarter6585
    @ramoncarter6585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It might be an economical car but looks beautiful at first thought the rear upgrade looked like a 90s car something forgotten existed Mitsubishi Mirage/Eagle Summit or Pontiac Leman Hatchback. This little baby would fit in the budget reason Nissan uses these CVTS help improve fuel economy especially now how gas prices are just going up by the day. So far like the car recommended but wouldn't drive one just not me unless had no other choice if needed another vehicle.

  • @Trance88
    @Trance88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A really cool looking vehicle. I like the shade of blue on the test car. The biggest problem is what's wrong with Nissan in general; sluggish and unreliable CVT transmissions. Scotty Kilmer basically says don't buy a Nissan even if your life depended on it.

    • @occckid123
      @occckid123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      375k on my altima cvt right now.

  • @mare-aura
    @mare-aura 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm planning to buy the Kicks in Thailand so I'm looking for international reviews ... This is in the US? It's not e-Power?
    In Thailand, the driving system is e-Power with the acceleration of 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) at 8 seconds.

  • @questioner1596
    @questioner1596 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is fine, but I'd rather have the Cube. The Kicks is no more powerful, but the Cube had better interior space, and had a rear arm rest. You could even get a manual on the base Cube (which I test drove in 2010).

  • @gregg9672
    @gregg9672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    isnt this just the Versa raised up?

  • @bw6415
    @bw6415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I still hear and read references to the KIcks being the replacement for the Juke, but IT WAS NOT !! People need to do their homework. It replaced the Versa hatchback which didn’t sell well ! The Juke (I owned two of them) went away because they didn’t sell as strongly as the Rogue Sport would. It’s a numbers/$$$$ game. Europe and other regions still get a Juke because they don’t want big vehicles unlike the U.S. where most people want vehicles with more space. We lose out on great vehicles like the Juke because the masses demand it.

    • @J.Gainez
      @J.Gainez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      let’s be honest it was pretty ugly anyway

  • @jorgerodrigogomezflores5711
    @jorgerodrigogomezflores5711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’d really like to see Nissan bringing the Kicks turbo, powered by the Mercedes-Renault-Nissan co-developed 1.3L making 155Hp, that would really spice things up, especially when mated to the 6-speed manual, they could sell that as the Kicks Nismo in the U.S. and sell them by the dozen.

    • @jamessteven526
      @jamessteven526 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We had a Nismo Juke with 188 horsepower. Nobody liked it, didn't sell well.

  • @AndresSalazarAutos
    @AndresSalazarAutos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This Kick is approaching 1990s performance... braking is impressive though

  • @edsmith9855
    @edsmith9855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Living in Minnesota, no AWD is a deal breaker for me.

  • @NissanAltimaGuy
    @NissanAltimaGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now they need to add the 1.5 vc turbo with 202hp 225tq that’s going in the 22 rogue.

  • @AutoNorth
    @AutoNorth 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    “….this Pumped Up Kicks should find even more traction” - I see what you did there.

  • @juliancortes87
    @juliancortes87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I kinda heard, “Nissan’s (f word) juke” 😂🤣

  • @oi32df
    @oi32df 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pity that it is not available with manual transmission like the Versa & Sentra here in Canada . Nissan got a good design but not in term of Jatco trany.

  • @mikea5205
    @mikea5205 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear God 10 seconds to 60? I was considering this for my daily commute but never mind!

  • @johnbehneman1546
    @johnbehneman1546 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I LOVE IT!!!!! SUGGESTION: ADD THE TWIN TURBO Z MOTOR TO IT. THEN NANE IT: KICKS R OR KICKS NISMO. WITH RED ACCENT TRIM. DROP & TUNE THE SUSPENSION!!!! NOW IT IS PERFECT FOR AUTO CROSS, DRIFTING & DAILY DRIVING.

  • @razvandobos9759
    @razvandobos9759 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As much as I didn’t like it, I wish we still sold the Juke in the US

  • @Tor109
    @Tor109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this worth buying and are dealers selling it at msrp? I had a 2015 outlander sport es which I loved and drove great. Would the kicks be an upgrade? They seem very similar.

  • @questioner1596
    @questioner1596 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You stole my Foster the People joke, Motorweek! 🤣

  • @freedomstar3814
    @freedomstar3814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0-60 10.0 the juke is on you Nissan !

  • @emilianoperezdominguez8642
    @emilianoperezdominguez8642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    DO NEXT MARCH REVIEW!!!

  • @waltergerolimon9589
    @waltergerolimon9589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why wear a helmet with such a slow car.

    • @1linkbelt
      @1linkbelt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look impressive. lol

  • @glanzera
    @glanzera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why does this exist?

    • @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961
      @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because people hated the juke which was very good and now we are left with this.

    • @bw6415
      @bw6415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This exist here in the U.S. and in other countries around the world for people who can not afford the average new car price of $ 40K + and they sell the shit out of them. They have proven to be very reliable, economical, cheap to insure and practical and look good doing it. It’s better to buy these and other cheaper entry level vehicles as new with a full warranty rather than buying a used car (somebody else’s problems being dumped on buyers).

    • @aidaaliten8817
      @aidaaliten8817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because crossovers make more profit than sports cars

    • @stevee8318
      @stevee8318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's a cheap, small hatchback - plenty of people want that.

  • @timp1051
    @timp1051 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's a nice looking car. Obviously built to a price point. I could live with the 1.6L motor but that CVT transmission, 😬, no thanks.

  • @Peter-ev2kr
    @Peter-ev2kr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't that the old Nissan logo?

  • @nodak81
    @nodak81 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing would be a winner if they added 30 more horses and swapped in a 6-speed auto.

  • @specialperson170
    @specialperson170 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ive got one its the slowest car ive ever driven and i used to drive 30 year old trucks with massive tires on it

  • @joalblo9581
    @joalblo9581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I liked the juke better

  • @goclunker
    @goclunker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Still no thx. 10 seconds to 60? In 2021? This is a juke on wheels. Needs some kicks to get up to speed

  • @TheMrPeteChannel
    @TheMrPeteChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just what the world needs.......
    Another crossover.

    • @Jan96106
      @Jan96106 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I did need it. The others were too expensive, and the Venue too boxy for me, although it did have nice features.

  • @ssx6867
    @ssx6867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i really want to by this car ,but Nissan CVT will not last unfortunately

  • @SuperStareGry
    @SuperStareGry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a turd of a car.

  • @luk0z4de97
    @luk0z4de97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well at least we still have the Juke here in the UK. It isn’t as unusual as it once was but it’s still far more interesting than the Kicks.

  • @TheCarCrazyGuy
    @TheCarCrazyGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Basically a Versa chassis

  • @keyshawnrussell245
    @keyshawnrussell245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it would’ve had the Juke turbo engine it probably would’ve sold a lot better it’s just too slow

  • @juschill7
    @juschill7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The kicks is sloooooooow

  • @billgateskilledmyuncle23
    @billgateskilledmyuncle23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't Nissan learn to quit pushing CVT transmissions? Put a manual in that little thing.

  • @robertaBooey69
    @robertaBooey69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kid car or rental

  • @DarthWaffle.
    @DarthWaffle. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nissan USED to make cars as good as Toyota.

    • @J.Gainez
      @J.Gainez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and you don’t see them anymore because they rusted so easily, coming from someone with a 97 5 speed maxima, it’s a rust bucket

  • @radudeATL
    @radudeATL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It just needs to look better. It's not ugly, but it ain't pretty or memorable in any way.

  • @anibalbabilonia1867
    @anibalbabilonia1867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0-60 in 10sec!😂that’s 1980s performance! Yikes!

  • @androo4519
    @androo4519 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think most people would agree it looks cool. Who knows. I think it looks pretty generic.

  • @allentoyokawa9068
    @allentoyokawa9068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice + cheap, it will sell well

  • @MartinGalway
    @MartinGalway 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exemplary "journalism" from Motorweek. Another "road test" that doesn't mention gasoline consumption whatsoever. For a car aimed at folks who have to watch their pocketbook. Gas is $6/gallon at the pumps 😡🤮🤮

    • @Motorweek
      @Motorweek  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It very likely was just cut due to time constraints but fuel economy information has always been available on our website motorweek.org.

    • @MartinGalway
      @MartinGalway 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @MotorWeek what time constraints are there on a youtube video? If you're saying some PBS broadcast TV episode has time constraints, that is one thing. But if y'all did journalism and are just accepting edits of your hard work based on that TV medium for your own TH-cam channel - which you control - that's odd. I suggest putting the "extra footage" back in, a la "director's cut." We love Motorweek ❤️

    • @Motorweek
      @Motorweek  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In a perfect world, we would create longer versions of the Road Tests that air on TV to post on our TH-cam channel but unfortunately we just do not have the resources and staff to do that.

    • @arayogi
      @arayogi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mine gets 38-41mpg depending on what my commute looks like. Usually $25-30 to fill.

    • @TheRealHungryJoe
      @TheRealHungryJoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Motorweek I would volunteer for free. With permission, we can let MW live another 30 years

  • @mrpoohbearlvr
    @mrpoohbearlvr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And the self destructing CVT is included for free! No one wants it but...Renault loves cheap cheap transmissions. Enjoy. 😁

  • @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961
    @ekgcanadianenthusiast9961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Juke is no longer funny look.and way better than the kicks.

  • @daoudaqtash9243
    @daoudaqtash9243 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    10 seconds to 60…Lol

  • @oldtwinsna8347
    @oldtwinsna8347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fleets will love getting tons of these plain jane vanilla cars.

  • @erich84502ify
    @erich84502ify 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Less powerful

  • @managepay
    @managepay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing has performance of a late 80s wagon. Geez

  • @LeoMkII
    @LeoMkII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    man it got even uglier!! how is that even possible??

  • @delcorick9967
    @delcorick9967 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would u even want one? Another hideous new suv..

  • @kf763
    @kf763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No thank you, 🤮. There is way better options out there in the auto world.

  • @troygreen9321
    @troygreen9321 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing is just too cheap

  • @DDd-hr6mz
    @DDd-hr6mz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    stone age acceleration. No excuse for that these days. Even at this price point.

  • @DoSum4Me
    @DoSum4Me 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of the worst vehicles I've ever driven.

  • @TommyG11814
    @TommyG11814 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nissan junk.

  • @emeyer6963
    @emeyer6963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    More Nissan junk.Look at all those scratches on the interior plastics.

    • @aidaaliten8817
      @aidaaliten8817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nissan Junke

    • @1989pulsar
      @1989pulsar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would be who ever is using it & can't aim for the usb ports. Duh.

    • @emeyer6963
      @emeyer6963 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aidaaliten8817 Lol

  • @basshead.
    @basshead. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1st

  • @jordanseals2233
    @jordanseals2233 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nissan sucks now, they are gonna end up like Mitsubishi

  • @speedwack
    @speedwack 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Junk