At what point in your life,did you ever think that a W16 Bugatti Divo was a fuel efficient car? That analogy alone, made your video very suspicious about your knowledge...
One inaccuracy: YOU NEED TYPE RATINGS ON THE AIRBUS AIRCRAFT. An a320 pilot cannot simply jump from the a320 to the a330 and than the a350, as although there are minor differences, minor differences are extremely important when we're talking about the way pilots are trained. Pilots should be able to locate switches and buttons using muscle memory, almost without looking, and know exactly when to use different switches. Due to the fact that the a320 has vastly different flight physics compared to wide body aircraft, the timings and calculations will all be different. The a350 is even worse, as it switches to an almost all screen system, which is not easy to navigate for a320/a330 pilots.
You are thinking of it more complex than it is. A typical type ratings is 3 to 6 weeks of training. All of mine fell into that time period. 747 was 5 weeks for me and the 737 was 3 weeks. My A340 was 6 weeks. But here is the kicker. I can get typed in the A330 in 1 day. The A320 in 6 days, and the A380 and A350 in 9 days. Flight physics are the same basically, due to FBW. We hired a 15 year Captain of an A320, got him typed on the A340 and from the first flight, it looked like he had flown the A340 for 15 years. I sat in the A350 sim, most buttons are in the same place. The whole cockpit system has the same base as the 340 plus extra fancy stuff. It’s brilliant really.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Ah thats cool, I thought the 350 was going to be significantly different! I feel like he did imply that you basically didnt need ANY further training though, of course a320-a330 takes little time but still requires SOME training for the type ratings. Still, cool to hear! Want to become a pilot one day so seeing your experience of living my dream is pretty cool. Have a nice day!
@@fakeshrew I loved Boeing (and still do) but when I was asked to switch to the A340, I wanted to do it as a new challenge, but was worried I was going to hate it. But turns out, I love Airbus too. Their cockpit philosophy is rather brilliant. Mixed fleet flying is indeed a very valid option and some airlines are starting to do so. In the Video, he didn’t explain well enough. Pilots do need additional training, but it’s minimal. And once they are trained, they can swap between airplanes. I think JAL had plans for pilots to fly the A380 and a320 simultaneously. Good for you that u want to become a pilot. Which country are you in?
There's nothing inaccurate about what he said. He did correctly identify MIXED FLEET FLYING: It is entirely possible to have different type ratings A320 and A330 and fly both within the same airline. SWISS is one airline that definitely employs this tactic.
The pilot shortage is well known, but quietly in the background there is also an upcoming tsunami of retirements of aircraft maintainers, with very few new people choosing to enter the career path, and bigger planes will only stretch the resources thinner. 😕
What I look for in a plane is the way the overheadcabins are configured, and the amount of noise the engines generate in the cabin. I had the joy of being on an A321 this summer. Flight was uneventful, but on landing the breaking was so intense I was nearly thrown out of my seat. Wow!
Airbus have come up with a great approach to make their air crafts much more efficient and easy on business yet not making any sacrifices on safety of the passengers, A-330Neo is a great solution for the commercial airline business.
You don't require an 's' on the word aircraft to form the plural. It's 1 aircraft, 2 aircraft etc, Users of English as a second language frequently make this error. Similarly there are no landing GEARS, it's called the landing gear because 'gear' is used in it's meaning of 'stuff'/equipment not the gears you find in a gearbox which are all metal and have teeth !
It's certain that airlines choose the A330NEO for that familiar nose and cockpit windshield design used in the original A300 in the 1970s. Overall, that 1970s design is still useable.
This plane has to carry far more fuel than the 787 to achieve its impressive range. This makes it thirsty with a higher cost of fuel per seat per kilometer than the 787. The main appeal of this plane is that an airline can get delivery sooner. Airbus had no choice but start again and make a new version of a330 because the original one introduced had lazy let's keep using the same a310 airframe like a 737 would do written all over it.
The A330neo is a great aircraft but not everyone is begging for it at all, and they are not exactly flying off the shelves either. Nearly 80% of A330ceo operators have decided to switch to the 787 because it is more efficient and versatile.
@@RogerPierre57What I said is very true. All you have to do is a little research. It may be a better option for some airlines but not many as you say. As I have stated, most ceo operators have decided to go wit the 787. The 787 has only had 3rd party production issues. It is extremely reliable and super efficient.
@@dmcr9525 In the past American airline companies blindly stuck to Boeing even though Airbus were better, the old 'not made here' head in the sand USA mantra, they did the same with Japanese cars until the Japanese proved their cars and trucks were much better...
So many inaccuracies in this video. The NEO has some modifications to the old CEO wing (it's WING, not Wingspan) But it's not a new wing. Just a highly modified version of the original wing.
I'm pretty sure it is a new wing. The wing of the CEO was actually designed for both the a330 and the a340, and because the a340 is a 4 engine aircraft, the CEO was not as efficient as it could have been. For the NEO though, they redid the wing with a composite sharklet and swept them back. I would say that if you add something to a wing, then change the shape, and then the dimensions, it is a entirely new wing. **Correct me if I'm wrong though**, I could very well be as I'm only really a hobbyist in the cockpit side of things.
I have worked on A330 neo as well as on old... And I would clearly say that A330neo is a disaster when compared to the beautiful A330... Its true that all the design modification and engines gives lot of benefits on fuel and performance. But how would it be possible to make this profit when the aircraft is grounded half of the day due to technical issues. That's where the neo fails.
Tires 10-12 years? I dont get that? how will the tired endure 10 years and thousands of landings? Also the clunker is more fuel efficient than the sports car youve shows XD
I don't think the tires would make that kind of time they boasted unless you put the plane in storage for ten years. If we had one that made that length of time with the cycles we have, we would have to remove it send it out for study of alien technology.
Many things during the covid and what the airlines have done with their aircraft and cancelling orders and retiring some aircraft, I said this will turn round to bite them back and this is so. However I seen potential in the Airbus A330-800 &900 NEOs where airlines do not see and envisage. For me the A330 NEOs 2 variants has lots of potential and I can see many routes that both to 800 & 900 NEOs can operate on and make money.. But this is my accessment....
The A330 neos are much more efficient than the previous generation. They have the best wing design in the market and they have state of the art flight systems on board. However, companies operating both Boeing and Airbus, easiily prefer the 787 because it's even a bit more fuel efficient while offering slightly better range and cargo capacity. They're not better on every situation and they're not better by much, but they're still better. Basically, I expect the A330neos to go for companies not operating Boeing machinery.
What better marketing you need than Cebu Pacific's 265% revenue growth. Presenting this story well can be enough to turn the tides. Uniform cockpit is also a major advantage. Remember, this was the origin of the whole 737MAX scandal.
...the problem stretching the 737 life, is the fact that is still an old analogue aircraft. Much harder to deal with big changes in engine power and engine positioning. If the 737 were fly-by-wire, it would have been easy to further develop like Airbus did with the neos.
You failed to mention the 787 has a better cash cost/avail. seat miles. Also, while the Dreamliner's list price is higher, after discounts that Boeing has the liquidity & resources to offer, the A330neo comes in well ABOVE the cost of a 787. Seems this vid was pretty 1 sided. ✈️🤔
The A350 and A330 both are great aircraft and certainly have their niche ... but that said RR really needs to step up their game and get the Trent series so that it can be left on wing longer. They aren't performing with the longevity expected. That will cost airlines big in the long run.
I fly the A330CEO and A330NEO and I can tell you... the cockpit of the A350 is NOTHING like the A330! A pilot cannot just transition from the 330 to the 350! That is not an accurate description.
I don’t think it’s correct say that only the 330 Neo introduction has led to CEBU Air’s revenue increase! I rather think the core reason was the covid prj end!
Airbus key innovation was CCQ, however from a A320 jumping to a A350….. And if CCQ was to be done right 1 of the crew have had to have flown on the type for at least 1 week so that a CCQ could jump in Having said that, it is Qatar Airways (A350 launch company) that put pressure on Airbus for the A350 New design, because right from the beginning the A350 was just an enhanced A330;, thus the A330Neo
The solutions of more pilots is better incentives and better pay..... put the hard work and the training and the cost of becoming a pilot is shouldered by the pilot then there should be incentive just like spending the money to become a doctor will pay off
The A330 NEO is the same aluminum frame from the past. No real innovation here. When you operate airbus you have to compromise passengers, or cargo, or fuel. The airbus flight by wire is over forty years old. Time to update this system. Regardless of airbus model, a complete new type rating is needed to fly the 330 or 320 or 350.
Sometimes what appears on paper to be a better plane is not always the best option. Good enough in many situations, rather the best in a few can be exactly what what an airline needs. Airbus's policy of continual development rather than having a short term benefit gained by maximising the milk from a cash cow appears to be working for them. When Airbus was initially planning to upgrade the A330, the designs were not well recieved. So poorly in fact that the A350 was born. It is rather ironic that the A330 neo is so much closer to those rejected original designs than it is its intended replacement, the A350.
The A330 neo has a better wing design than the A350 (because it was a development over the A350 design) and almost all of it's flight systems. The engines are also newer and benefit from the same benefits from the Trent found on the A350. The airframe is still the same of course, but it still received some improvements. So, I don't agree that the final product is closer to the original design than the A350 itself.
@miks564 In that it is as was originally envisaged, a re-engined, and re-winged design that retained the original fuselage design rather than the larger composite structure of the A350. As for the A350 wing design, are you aware that it has already been modified.
"Get me a symbolic picture for 'fuel efficient machine'!" "What about the Bugatti Veyron. It only guzzles 25 l / 100 km on average. That's almost nothing compared to an A330." "Yeah, I'll take that. An Abrams M1 would certainly be too much."
I don't know why using the same cockpit (configuration) is quite brilliant. It is just common sense and cheaper, unless you want to keep a design team occupied with new designs and sell expensive training packages.
The "Neo" engines are more efficient, but burning hydrocarbon jet fuel still produces hot exhaust which is mainly H20 and CO2. At a jet's cruising altitude, the air temperature is way below freezing and the invisible hot H2O vapor expelled by the neo's engines freezes into tiny white visible ice crystals, so, yes, neos leave contrails, too.
This channel only favors Airbus. There’s no level playing field between the two plane makers. I would rather watch a channel that talks about the good and the bad between both plane makers.
Tap was the first customer and is not very satisfied with the performance of the RR engines in term of consumption. But they are working to improve engine performance .
At what point in your life,did you ever think that a W16 Bugatti Divo was a fuel efficient car? That analogy alone, made your video very suspicious about your knowledge...
Should have put a Prius photo in there....
One inaccuracy: YOU NEED TYPE RATINGS ON THE AIRBUS AIRCRAFT. An a320 pilot cannot simply jump from the a320 to the a330 and than the a350, as although there are minor differences, minor differences are extremely important when we're talking about the way pilots are trained. Pilots should be able to locate switches and buttons using muscle memory, almost without looking, and know exactly when to use different switches. Due to the fact that the a320 has vastly different flight physics compared to wide body aircraft, the timings and calculations will all be different. The a350 is even worse, as it switches to an almost all screen system, which is not easy to navigate for a320/a330 pilots.
You are thinking of it more complex than it is.
A typical type ratings is 3 to 6 weeks of training. All of mine fell into that time period. 747 was 5 weeks for me and the 737 was 3 weeks.
My A340 was 6 weeks. But here is the kicker. I can get typed in the A330 in 1 day. The A320 in 6 days, and the A380 and A350 in 9 days.
Flight physics are the same basically, due to FBW. We hired a 15 year Captain of an A320, got him typed on the A340 and from the first flight, it looked like he had flown the A340 for 15 years.
I sat in the A350 sim, most buttons are in the same place. The whole cockpit system has the same base as the 340 plus extra fancy stuff. It’s brilliant really.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Ah thats cool, I thought the 350 was going to be significantly different!
I feel like he did imply that you basically didnt need ANY further training though, of course a320-a330 takes little time but still requires SOME training for the type ratings.
Still, cool to hear! Want to become a pilot one day so seeing your experience of living my dream is pretty cool. Have a nice day!
@@fakeshrew I loved Boeing (and still do) but when I was asked to switch to the A340, I wanted to do it as a new challenge, but was worried I was going to hate it. But turns out, I love Airbus too. Their cockpit philosophy is rather brilliant. Mixed fleet flying is indeed a very valid option and some airlines are starting to do so.
In the Video, he didn’t explain well enough. Pilots do need additional training, but it’s minimal. And once they are trained, they can swap between airplanes. I think JAL had plans for pilots to fly the A380 and a320 simultaneously.
Good for you that u want to become a pilot. Which country are you in?
There's nothing inaccurate about what he said. He did correctly identify MIXED FLEET FLYING: It is entirely possible to have different type ratings A320 and A330 and fly both within the same airline. SWISS is one airline that definitely employs this tactic.
@@MODECHARLIE I agree with you.
Guy goes on for far too too long, non stop talk
Yep, watch time is important, so they repeat the same information 20 times, it’s annoying
Stop hating! It's a great video!
@@alonzoj.107 He could say the same thing in 5 minutes. He needs someone to do his quality control.
So turn it off.
@@cms4229 But you need feedback to improve and get better
"Slick, fuel efficient machine" while showing a BUGATTI with a W16 engine that have the ability to burn 100 liters of fuel in 10 minutes😂
Make boeing videos for once
TH-cam Is Drunk Again
3:16 Talks excessively about airbus. Shows video of 787 tyre change.
Like Boeing, this is an example of Marketing functions writing scripts to push their message - especially to individuals. Just PR again.
Unlike Boeing...Airbus has planes that does not kill you because the management lied about a plane.
Sales are going to increase for the NEO, trust me!
Just like Lockheed is buying Boeing !!!
Why would anyone trust you !!!
Way to be optimistic!
Still won’t reach the numbers of the 787 the 787 is simply more efficient
@@trenton.tchannel1810 Yes
@@trenton.tchannel1810Doesnt need to. The A350 are trouncing the 787 and will do vs the 777X aswell.
The pilot shortage is well known, but quietly in the background there is also an upcoming tsunami of retirements of aircraft maintainers, with very few new people choosing to enter the career path, and bigger planes will only stretch the resources thinner. 😕
USA needs to tap the trans movement for pilots, apparently anyone can self-ID as a pilot, how great is that ?
A330NEO is a great product.I have flown on a Delta's one from Seattle to Amsterdam economy.Very nice and comfortable flight.👍
I flew on the same plane in 2022.
What I look for in a plane is the way the overheadcabins are configured, and the amount of noise the engines generate in the cabin.
I had the joy of being on an A321 this summer. Flight was uneventful, but on landing the breaking was so intense I was nearly thrown out of my seat. Wow!
Airbus have come up with a great approach to make their air crafts much more efficient and easy on business yet not making any sacrifices on safety of the passengers, A-330Neo is a great solution for the commercial airline business.
You don't require an 's' on the word aircraft to form the plural. It's 1 aircraft, 2 aircraft etc, Users of English as a second language frequently make this error. Similarly there are no landing GEARS, it's called the landing gear because 'gear' is used in it's meaning of 'stuff'/equipment not the gears you find in a gearbox which are all metal and have teeth !
@@grahamstevenson1740 Thanks for pointing out the mistakes because English is my second language. I will try to avoid mistakes further
One thing remains: The A330 neo remains like its predecessor, the king of butter landings.
Im glad Airbus Never gave up on this beauty
Who else noted the tailstrike on takeoff with the 1000 without livery at 1.09? Not supposed to happen,,,
Lots of sparkles....
3:39 you really showed a Bugatti when you said "fuel efficient machine"
Even in the simulators this aircraft is a pleasure to fly. Airbus REALLY did their thing with this one
It's certain that airlines choose the A330NEO for that familiar nose and cockpit windshield design used in the original A300 in the 1970s. Overall, that 1970s design is still useable.
This plane has to carry far more fuel than the 787 to achieve its impressive range. This makes it thirsty with a higher cost of fuel per seat per kilometer than the 787. The main appeal of this plane is that an airline can get delivery sooner. Airbus had no choice but start again and make a new version of a330 because the original one introduced had lazy let's keep using the same a310 airframe like a 737 would do written all over it.
The A330neo is a great aircraft but not everyone is begging for it at all, and they are not exactly flying off the shelves either. Nearly 80% of A330ceo operators have decided to switch to the 787 because it is more efficient and versatile.
Oh cool
@@RogerPierre57 also cool
@@RogerPierre57What I said is very true. All you have to do is a little research. It may be a better option for some airlines but not many as you say. As I have stated, most ceo operators have decided to go wit the 787. The 787 has only had 3rd party production issues. It is extremely reliable and super efficient.
@@dmcr9525 In the past American airline companies blindly stuck to Boeing even though Airbus were better, the old 'not made here' head in the sand USA mantra, they did the same with Japanese cars until the Japanese proved their cars and trucks were much better...
@@chrissmith2114 I totally agree, however in the case of the 787 vs A330neo, the 787 is the clear winner.
Airbus > Boeing
No mention (unsurprisingly (yet!)) of other reasons for the pilot shortages…It's known. The lawsuits are already in progress…I'll leave it at that.
So many inaccuracies in this video. The NEO has some modifications to the old CEO wing (it's WING, not Wingspan) But it's not a new wing. Just a highly modified version of the original wing.
I'm pretty sure it is a new wing. The wing of the CEO was actually designed for both the a330 and the a340, and because the a340 is a 4 engine aircraft, the CEO was not as efficient as it could have been. For the NEO though, they redid the wing with a composite sharklet and swept them back. I would say that if you add something to a wing, then change the shape, and then the dimensions, it is a entirely new wing.
**Correct me if I'm wrong though**, I could very well be as I'm only really a hobbyist in the cockpit side of things.
@@fakeshrewabsolutely, the wing area is the same for both A340-200/300 and the A330-300
@@fakeshrewyou are correct in all this.
I have worked on A330 neo as well as on old... And I would clearly say that A330neo is a disaster when compared to the beautiful A330... Its true that all the design modification and engines gives lot of benefits on fuel and performance. But how would it be possible to make this profit when the aircraft is grounded half of the day due to technical issues. That's where the neo fails.
Tires 10-12 years? I dont get that? how will the tired endure 10 years and thousands of landings? Also the clunker is more fuel efficient than the sports car youve shows XD
Wish To Have Airbus A330-1000, Also the Boeing 777-10!
Just flew with it, it's a very comfortable plane. Much less noise than a 777 although not as quite as the A380
A350 is also an incredibly quiet plane.
Still Airbus A330 is an old frame therefore most of the clients are opting for Boeing 787 or airbus A 350.
If they made an a380 Neo I think it would probably succeed
I don't think the tires would make that kind of time they boasted unless you put the plane in storage for ten years. If we had one that made that length of time with the cycles we have, we would have to remove it send it out for study of alien technology.
Condor is building up a fleet of 23 A330Neo,too.
If the pilot crisis is so bad why are airlines not doing anything about it alot of people want to be pilots its just too expensive
That Bugatti Veyron a "fuel efficient machine"? I think not! ;)
It's like upgrading from a clunker to a sleek fuel efficient machine *insert fuel efficient Bugatti photo* 😂😂
3:38 A fuel efficient Veyron - That can drink a tank in 12 minutes
My gosh, so much rambling and repeating sentences...
Fuel efficient machine.
Goes on to show a Bugatti.
Lol.
I don’t think airlines are begging for this plane.
Why u added a 737-8 ? Not an Airbus, my guy😂😂 & a 777 & 787? 😂
I Like A330neo I Have Experience The A330-900 Whit Delta From CDG-LAX Great Fligth.Great Video
Advertising for Airbus completely
Many things during the covid and what the airlines have done with their aircraft and cancelling orders and retiring some aircraft, I said this will turn round to bite them back and this is so.
However I seen potential in the Airbus A330-800 &900 NEOs where airlines do not see and envisage.
For me the A330 NEOs 2 variants has lots of potential and I can see many routes that both to 800 & 900 NEOs can operate on and make money..
But this is my accessment....
The A330 neos are much more efficient than the previous generation. They have the best wing design in the market and they have state of the art flight systems on board.
However, companies operating both Boeing and Airbus, easiily prefer the 787 because it's even a bit more fuel efficient while offering slightly better range and cargo capacity. They're not better on every situation and they're not better by much, but they're still better.
Basically, I expect the A330neos to go for companies not operating Boeing machinery.
What better marketing you need than Cebu Pacific's 265% revenue growth. Presenting this story well can be enough to turn the tides. Uniform cockpit is also a major advantage. Remember, this was the origin of the whole 737MAX scandal.
...the problem stretching the 737 life, is the fact that is still an old analogue aircraft. Much harder to deal with big changes in engine power and engine positioning.
If the 737 were fly-by-wire, it would have been easy to further develop like Airbus did with the neos.
Malaysia Airlines also will get 20 a330neo to replace all the current a330. I can't wait for this airbus.....
It’s an advertisement about A330. 😮
You failed to mention the 787 has a better cash cost/avail. seat miles. Also, while the Dreamliner's list price is higher, after discounts that Boeing has the liquidity & resources to offer, the A330neo comes in well ABOVE the cost of a 787. Seems this vid was pretty 1 sided. ✈️🤔
But can these airlines get brand new B787 before 2030 with the current production rate and backlogs? Not really.
Airbus video yet they keep showing the new 777X when talking about the wings 🤣
Because the 330 neo wont stand up to the 7x
@@andrewlarson7895Apples & pears. They are not in the same market segment. Ridiculous to attempt to compare the two
@@alabama1413 yes they are not compatible with each other i didn't make the video im just responding to what it said..
Yahh they are begging to get some… maybe not.. 😂
Ok but Bugatti being fuel efficient 💀
I like the look of the aircraft.
The A350 and A330 both are great aircraft and certainly have their niche ... but that said RR really needs to step up their game and get the Trent series so that it can be left on wing longer. They aren't performing with the longevity expected. That will cost airlines big in the long run.
Source material please.............
@@artrandy His source was GE and P&W publicity departments..
I'm not sure whether your naive or stupid.
I learned a lot of detail about what makes 330 neo set apart. Thanks for the video!
Incorrect. Not EVERY Airline Company wants it. LCC's don't want it.
Neither do 787 operators. And 80 of the A330CEO operators who are switching over to the 787.
Cebu Pacific and Air Asia are LCC!
@kuru61 are you thinking Worldwide or just Europe and those countries? I'm thinking North American Companies, Canadian, American & Mexican.
@@danwardlaw2160 Air Asia and Cebu Pacific are not North American. I am thinking worldwide including the EU and the Philippines
Who trusts boeing these days anyway. 737 max anyone ?
me
Talking in circles...
I fly the A330CEO and A330NEO and I can tell you... the cockpit of the A350 is NOTHING like the A330! A pilot cannot just transition from the 330 to the 350! That is not an accurate description.
I don’t think it’s correct say that only the 330 Neo introduction has led to CEBU Air’s revenue increase! I rather think the core reason was the covid prj end!
Why nobody has the guts to mention the other reason of qualified pilots! The pilots whi did not wanted the vax during C and got fired!
Many inserts of none Airbus products. This is not professional. Thumb down and I stopped watching 2 minutes in the run because of that.
The A330-800 has only had 12 orders. They're hardly rolling off the production line. The 900 however, has around 330 orders to date.
Airbus key innovation was CCQ, however from a A320 jumping to a A350…..
And if CCQ was to be done right 1 of the crew have had to have flown on the type for at least 1 week so that a CCQ could jump in
Having said that, it is Qatar Airways (A350 launch company) that put pressure on Airbus for the A350 New design, because right from the beginning the A350 was just an enhanced A330;, thus the A330Neo
The solutions of more pilots is better incentives and better pay..... put the hard work and the training and the cost of becoming a pilot is shouldered by the pilot then there should be incentive just like spending the money to become a doctor will pay off
Showing a Bugatti as an example of something sleek and fuel efficient must be someone having a laugh ;-)
A330 is junk sorry
The A330 NEO is the same aluminum frame from the past. No real innovation here. When you operate airbus you have to compromise passengers, or cargo, or fuel. The airbus flight by wire is over forty years old. Time to update this system. Regardless of airbus model, a complete new type rating is needed to fly the 330 or 320 or 350.
Wow, I did not know that you could slip from the a350 all the way down to the a320 and back without any further training.
How nice
Well, you do need extra training for a new type rating. But it takes days, not weeks.
That’s not true tho, you need a specific type rating for everyone of them.
@@mellewisselo8025 thanks for the insight.
@@mellewisselo8025 right. But it’s not a full type rating course.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183I thought the A330 and A350 were a “differences” type but the A320 was an entirely different one. 🤷♂️
I love ❤
Everything was going well until you called bugatti fuel efficient :D
For economy class passengers, this is the best aircraft.
No aircraft tire lasts 10-12 years no matter what it’s made from. More like 1-2 months would be allot
7000 doesn't really have bits from XWB. The core is the same as Trent 1000 - TEN.
Sleek fuel efficient machine, shows Bugatti 😂😂
Aliens exist
It seems like the CEO of Airbus is narrating this video😅
Delta could provide a big push for this programme. I would love to strengthen their Airbus Strategie by ordering a few plus A35k. Let us wait and see.
I think it's based on the Trent 1000 core and not the XWB.
Sometimes what appears on paper to be a better plane is not always the best option.
Good enough in many situations, rather the best in a few can be exactly what what an airline needs.
Airbus's policy of continual development rather than having a short term benefit gained by maximising the milk from a cash cow appears to be working for them.
When Airbus was initially planning to upgrade the A330, the designs were not well recieved. So poorly in fact that the A350 was born.
It is rather ironic that the A330 neo is so much closer to those rejected original designs than it is its intended replacement, the A350.
The A330 neo has a better wing design than the A350 (because it was a development over the A350 design) and almost all of it's flight systems. The engines are also newer and benefit from the same benefits from the Trent found on the A350. The airframe is still the same of course, but it still received some improvements.
So, I don't agree that the final product is closer to the original design than the A350 itself.
@miks564 In that it is as was originally envisaged, a re-engined, and re-winged design that retained the original fuselage design rather than the larger composite structure of the A350.
As for the A350 wing design, are you aware that it has already been modified.
"Get me a symbolic picture for 'fuel efficient machine'!"
"What about the Bugatti Veyron. It only guzzles 25 l / 100 km on average. That's almost nothing compared to an A330."
"Yeah, I'll take that. An Abrams M1 would certainly be too much."
Yes the video is kinda ruined by some of the weird footage choices, its a shame as the audio is good.
Fed up of hearing "you see".😡😡😡
Gotta love an Airbus, haven't ya?
Airbus a330neo is an amazing aircraft.
Boeing should clean sheet a new 767 for a mid-range haul competitor capable of travel similar distances (or further)
They already have that: the 787.
I don't know why using the same cockpit (configuration) is quite brilliant. It is just common sense and cheaper, unless you want to keep a design team occupied with new designs and sell expensive training packages.
What is brilliant about it, is being fly-by-wire and making it easier to develop 'flying operating' software over the years.
The video sounds like it's sponsored!
Loved the Boeing in the vid…..😂😂😂
Neo is the ONE, and there is no spoon.😎
The standardised cockpit layout of Airbus not only makes it easier for the cockpit crew but also for the maintenance crew.
I am waiting for a a320 xlr.
Omg, Amen. Wayyyyy to talky.
nice
And airbus done it again❤
Still 2 4 2 in eco?
Do the airbus neos still produce trails?
The "Neo" engines are more efficient, but burning hydrocarbon jet fuel still produces hot exhaust which is mainly H20 and CO2. At a jet's cruising altitude, the air temperature is way below freezing and the invisible hot H2O vapor expelled by the neo's engines freezes into tiny white visible ice crystals, so, yes, neos leave contrails, too.
AIRBUS FANBOI CHANNEL😂😂😂
said by a Boeing fan-boy.
Awesome.
YYC-WAW
Its true
USA needs to tap the trans movement for pilots, apparently anyone can self-ID as a pilot, how great is that ?
😂
This channel only favors Airbus. There’s no level playing field between the two plane makers. I would rather watch a channel that talks about the good and the bad between both plane makers.
Makes a change from the fawning Boeing commentary. That said balanced reporting is preferable.
THANK YOU!! 👍😉✈️✌️
Boeing equivalent remains grounded, so what to compare that with? Comac?
Relax! If it’s about your patriotism, Böing has German roots anyways.
Boeing has poor manufacturing they pay their workers less than McDonald’s
Tap was the first customer and is not very satisfied with the performance of the RR engines in term of consumption. But they are working to improve engine performance .
but delta keeps buying more? also to keep in mind that the comments were made by their ceo who was fired due to a scandal
@@vikneshwaran8606delta is buying more because they already have a big Airbus fleet. They need them to phase out there older 300s and 200s