Eco Anxiety

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @HarrytheEarFan
    @HarrytheEarFan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    During the little ice age they blamed witches for the bad cold weather and crop failures. People never change.

  • @PeterLebbing
    @PeterLebbing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I suggest that climate alarmists like dr. Howard set a good example by starting directly living their lives completely fossil free. When that succeed the world will follow, when not shut up forever!

  • @Snowdog070
    @Snowdog070 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The burning of forests is a natural part of the life span and renewal of the Boreal Forest. Anyone who proclaims that somehow the fact that I drive a RAM pick-up with a V8 hemi engine is causing the forests to burn should give their head a shake and read a book.

  • @nascar0509
    @nascar0509 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Any wonder kids are depressed and anxious when the so-called "adults" left the room years ago and abdicated all responsibility.

  • @picobyte
    @picobyte 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This whole climate, corona and Dutch nitrogen crap has gone way to far.

  • @anomamos9095
    @anomamos9095 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The medieval warm period and the little ice age are dismissed as local events and not a global phenomenon and therefore should not be considered an examples of natural global climate variability.
    You can attempt to believe that as long as you ignore proxy data from coral reef cores taken from Australia’s Great Barrier Reef and other proxy data from other southern hemisphere locations that all indicate those local events to be global.

  • @anthonymorris5084
    @anthonymorris5084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Actually, I feel like the climate movement is sucking the sole out of me. And emptying my bank account.

  • @chaist94
    @chaist94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Please stop saying “fossil fuels”. Terrestrial hydrocarbons have nothing to do with ancient plants or animals.

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They absolutely do. It's not a theory, it's proven.

  • @shilohsheridan5347
    @shilohsheridan5347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wish you would do a piece on new home builders in Edmonton/Calgary… some are completely nuts like Jayman Built with their solar panels, heat pumps, striving to be better zero with no gas to home… Landmark as well

  • @ruthlongridge2137
    @ruthlongridge2137 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FortunatelyI am not concerned at all, just tired of their BS

  • @turtlegrams6582
    @turtlegrams6582 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    📯🕒⏳⌛; KJVB James 4: 4 you adulterers and adulteress know you not that the friendship of this world is enmity with GOD ? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of GOD .

  • @picobyte
    @picobyte 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Become an electrical engineer and study physics.

  • @Cspacecat
    @Cspacecat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    American consumers and businesses already spend roughly $700 billion to $1 trillion each year on coal, oil, and natural gas, and suffer the incalculable costs of pollution from fossil fuels through damage to our health and environment. If America continues along a business-as-usual energy path, U.S. fossil fuel spending is likely to grow, totaling an estimated $23 trillion between 2010 and 2030. Switching to renewables will dramatically decrease the environmental and health damages caused by the byproducts of fossil fuel consumption.

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The health issues with fossil fuels are a net positive. They've saved billions of lives. In England in the 1800's many people died from pollution emitted from coal. Why do you think there was no movement or desire to eliminate coal?
      Going back 10,000 years and then moving forward right up until the 1800's nothing much changed. The history of humanity was a story of suffering and impoverishment. People worked from sunup until sundown and died from treatable disease. Most of the world suffered from malnutrition.
      In the late 1800's oil was discovered. From that moment GDP, health, prosperity, longevity and quality of life soared to unprecedented heights at unprecedented speed. Within only a hundred years humans landed on the moon and the modern world came into being. How do you reconcile all of this with your demonization of fossil fuels, an energy source that has saved billions of lives, lifted billions out of poverty and created the anomaly that is the modern world.

    • @Darthbelal
      @Darthbelal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well stated, Anthony....

    • @anthonymorris5084
      @anthonymorris5084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Darthbelal Thanks! I don't think many people understand this. They think history began the day they were born. Cheers.

    • @Cspacecat
      @Cspacecat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anthonymorris5084 My 6th rides a 55 mph unicycle as his primary vehicle. KWhs to mpg, he used to average about 2,000 mpg. Recently, I 3D printed him a front faring that hooks to his gloves. Now he averages about 3,300 mpg. The best I ever rode was a Kawasaki Ninja 250 at about 70 mpg. I have an F150 at 13.6 mpg, another F150 at 18.3 mpg, and a Ford Fusion Hybrid Plugin at 53.2 mpg. I pull trailers to the job sites and the present-day batteries aren't strong enough. The solid-state batteries are coming. The multiplier effect for windmills is 18 to 1 and solar panels is 9 to 1 in BTU output. Why would anyone be stupid enough to burn a valuable resource for energy with those ratios? Of course, the fossil fuel industry won't tell you that. The billionaires are out to get all the money they can at everyone else's expense.

    • @Cspacecat
      @Cspacecat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anthonymorris5084 Just remember, the name of the game is the diversion of money.