For those having problems with the focus motor on this lens, there is an easy DIY fix that appears to be working for most. There is a ribbon that comes loose under the focus scale that is accessible under the focus rubber, plenty of videos on youtube showing how to easily do the fix yourself. Own this lens myself and love it.
I just bought that very lens in Carmarthenshire Cameras last month for £315. It's without doubt the sharpest lens I now own. Bolted onto my D500 and it makes for fantastic wildlife photography. One thing I've found since becoming interested in photography, there seems to be those who will have the latest and greatest everything (and don't hold back in telling everyone they need it too) and those who have some common sense.
For 20 year sur I used the first push-pull version of this gem and I shot 300000 portraits coupled with my F4 then F5. Then I sold it 10 years ago for 250€ to a you fellow that wanted to start portrait photography. I rebought it 3 days ago after bring désappointes with the 70-300 f4,5 ( un crisp pics ). I am so happy to use it again on my Nikon Df. What à Marcel lois combo and the push-pull is so instinctive and quick to capture face emotions with a blured back ground and beautiful colors.
4 years ago, I sold my DSLR stuff to become mirrorless. 2 years ago, I returned to DSLR (D800 and D800E). One of the lenses I rebought, was this 80-200 ED. It is large and heavy BUT OPTICAL SUPERB. I compared it to the 85 1.8D and 1.8G to perhaps have a lighter and smaller option. Surprisingly, at f2.8 the 80-200 was sharper than both contestants and showed way less fringing and loss of contrast in back lighting situations than the 1.8D. If you find a copy with good glass and working AF, get it!
No adapter needed, AF-S 80-200 will fit and be fully functional on the D3XXX and D5XXX series of cameras. The older AF 80-200D lenses won't autofocus but otherwise work fine on those cameras.
I have the first AF version 80-200 2.8 push-pull since January 2022. It cost me 200€. It is heavy but it gives wonderful images. I had used it in concert, airshow, photoshoot and guess what : I use it manually like pro did it before and I have sharp images with my D5300. I don't feel the need to change only to have a newer version because it is already great wide open at 2.8. But it is so sharp between f/3,5 - 4. After I got my first full frame the Nikon D800, I was amazed by the pics I got with that 36MP I understand the argument you had with that photographer. But it is khown that the autofocus of the AF-S 80-200 doesn't last long. This AF-S version has a defect. Nevertheless it gives wonderful images even if used it manually. Hope that you will not encounter that problem
Nice! Thank you for sharing! Glad to know that you're getting those shots with the push-pull 80-200! I have a feeling that, eventually, I will have to use the manual focus but your success with the push-pull is giving me hope! I don't think I'll sell it as the glass is still in amazing condition. Again, thanks for sharing!
@@BoostLeekdMedia the AF, AF-D 2nd gen push-pull, AF-D 3rd gen with 2 rings have the same optical quality. Don't worry you have 2 rings with the AF-S and it is much better to set the zoom and the focus. Push-pull tend to creep. Many photographers did not encounter those problems with the autofocus motor. I think that it will outlast all your bodies. Those things are tank. Of course no need to sell because it is a wonderful lens. Me too I won't sell mine. Those old lenses will outlast all newer lenses that have many electronic stuffs inside them. Imagine those old Nikkor AI lenses and Pre-AI from 70-80s are still working. My push-pull version were manufactured between 1988-1992.
After 3 months using this lens, here are some pros and cons: + Sharp, sharp, at 200mm f2.8 it still sharp (pair with low mpx camera like D700, D3,...) + IQ overall is great, the lens has its character (color, bokeh, colour, ...) + Autofocus fast on D3, at 200mm it might suffer some hunting but not a big deal + The hold focus button is there, you can only find it on expensive lens + It look cool (yeah this is the main i reason i move from 85mm to telephoto, it look much cooler than the 80-200 III version) - Draw attention, people sometime stare at you - Autofocus rarely stop working even when you push down the focus button (to fix this, change to another focal lenght, focus then go back), it annoying but i can live with this - Kind of useless tripod collar - It freaking heavy, like why it so heavy compare to other 70-200mm lens out there If you still hesistant to buy this lens cuz you here people say the autofocus goes out, just remember to use it frequently
I just recently purchased the push/pull version of this and I absolutely love it. Don't accept bad advice like that mentioned. Not all of us were born into money. We live in a period where older great equipment that's fantastic, can be purchased at an affordable price.
@@BoostLeekdMedia it’s a really nice lens for the cost. I got mine for about $200 and have used it a ton. I just used it to shoot a wedding 2 weeks ago.
I use lenses and cameras that are between 10 and 45 years old and take amazing photos. You can have the latest kit but it all comes down to the photographers skill. I’ve been shooting for 35 years now and occasionally I still shoot and process my own film along with the digital stuff. I just purchased a spare one of these lenses in mint condition at a pawn shop last month for $250
I had the non-S version of this lens. It was superbly sharp. Some of the crispest images I've ever taken were with a D70 and D700 with that lens - I was just walking through LR Classic the other day and searched for that lens, and wishing I hadn't sold it to pay son's tuition during a period of unemployment on my part... that and my 20 D - RB67 with 2 lenses...
I found someone selling this and I marked it, my ooinion about this lens is since this is a very old lens and very expensive on its time and that where I sudenly came up that theres only fewer people will use this on portrait today, so I will buy this since newer lenses of course are good but this will give more different vibe!
Very nice! the 80-200 non af-s version was the lens that made me want to get this AF-S version. The 80-200 2.8 lenses are pretty under rated for what they are. Thanks for sharing!
Just keep in mind not all AFS lenses are the same. It may have the badge but build is greatly different. Still very nice find for $350 sheesh, that’s awesome for 2.8 and the range on fx/dx.
I have the old, pre D 80-200mm f2.8 push pull lens and I love it. Built like a tank and weighs just as much, but wow the image quality. The beast I have, I got for $150. Best money I ever spent. This lens on my D700 with an MB-D10 grip and I'm looking at 6 pounds of photographic joy.
Nice! That 80-200 (non-AFS) was the one that made me tune into the AF-S model since it was the model that I first used. Totally agree with you about how GOOD that lens is as well.
I have had this lens for about 15 years now. I also have the very, very rare manual focus 80-200mm 2.8 (1,9kg!) and some more modern 70-200mm 2.8's. Pro's ; on FX+DX; very sharp, almost no CA and the huge sun shade is great for taking pictures when it's snowing. Con's; heavy and difficult to turn focus/zoom (big). Only on the D850 you start to see the age of this lens (resolving details gets difficult). At the time, it came together with the 28-70mm 2.8 (same pro's and con's) The follow up of this lens and the first version of the 70-200mm was good on DX but was REALLY terrible on FX. I will never sell this 80-200 AF-S underdog.
Brother, All my lenses are old but there gold!!! I just got a Nikon 28-85, and a ProMaster for Nikon 28-300!! Forget the hype of getting the latest!!! You have a dope great lens my man!! Plus I love your old Nikon gear!!! Keep shooting bro!!!😁😁👍🏾📷📷
I just bought a near mint copy of this lens . Awaiting its arrival in the post at some point tomorrow . Reviews are very good and I will use it along with a 16 - 35 f4 Nikkor on a D810 , as required for varying subjects .
It is really good for it's age. One thing that surprised me was how sharp it was. I think mine is running on luck since the autofocus is beginning to not properly function at times. But it's a nice one. Enjoy it with your amazing D810!
People just need good things, you know. Most photographers always recommend new items or good items. But it is based on our subject. I like old items because mostly I take still photos so I can spend time adjusting the lens or camera. Even sometimes I make photos look like old generation photos.
Hmm put that on your Z6 with FTZ adapter gives you about 18". At around 5 pounds that's quite a defensive weapon if you ever needed it. Thanks for the video
It's an amasing lens! The results are amasing for something this cheap, the sharpness is great, focus speed is ok, I don't have big expectations for it, so I don't mind it. It's big and heavy, but it's a tank and I love it I will never sell it, it's just something you should have even though you have the 70-200. It's a badass lens!
I've got the Nikon Zoom Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8 D that was manufactured in 1993-1997. This jewel is made almost entirely of metal and is precision made in Japan, not offshored to the lowest bidder. It's optically magnificent, its weight and balance are perfect, materials, fit, finish, shape and form are all a pleasure to use with the Nikon F5. This particular lens model does not have tripod collar and I like it that way. Incredible lens! Will never sell this jewel! BTW, most of the professional photographers that used Nikon cameras used this lens in the 90s. No wonder.
Hi! Planning to get this lens. Good reviews though, older version. The price is reasonable, this days. Will be faster with the silent motors. Olders lens have there own kind of rendetion in the pictures you take. Like the Golder era, of movies ,songs and cars.. lol.. Thanks for the video. Keep up the good work.
The best version of this lens is the 4th version. The one that was called "new". It was the final screw drive version with internal focus, rather than the push pull versions, prior. Optically, they're the same but internal focus, you don't suck in dust over time. That version is the final version before they went to 70-200. The problem with that lens is, those first gen AF-S motors are failure prone (like in the 28-70mm 2.8; "The Beast".) If you can buy one with an already broken AFS motor, so the price is right for manual lens, then can be a good way to go. Especially for mirrorless or low end DSLR without the drive motor anyway but if you want the ideal copy, the "new" version (with two rings) is the best. I'd say the older push/pull are second best. Followed by an already broken first gen AFS. The reason I wouldn't buy one of those still working is, you'll pay too much and might have a broken (manual focus only) lens within a year anyway. Optically, they're all PRO grade! Everyone w/ a DSLR should have one.
100% agreed with you. Thank you for sharing! Unfortunately, mine is beginning to no autofocus unless I move it physically a certain way and the AF will work immediately. But, as you said, in manual mode, it will still produce really nice images.
I have the generation one above that , and yes it is a very heavy lens , coupled to my Nikon F4 , I do believe the lens is a little bit heavier than the Nikon 4 I have
I bought this lens when it first came out in like 98 or 99. I love that lens! It is packed with ED elements. The only issue is the SWM. Once it starts to squeal, it is a sign the motor is dying. All Nikon SWM lenses squeal and die. I hate that. :/ You know that crazy thing is the Nikon internal motor lenses all seem to have a motor that fails. However, I have to say I have never ever had a camera screwdrive servo motor die. As a consequence, I find myself buying older screwdrive D series lenses. I am not doing sports or anything so I don't need ultra fast AF. As long as SWM are still available for repairs, I say keep using that lens!
I bought this sometime back when D70s was current.. circa 2012?, used it on D90 and now on a Sony A7iii via the Viltrox adapter and it still works great. IBIS has given this great piece a total revival lol. I had it overhauled before by Nikon (motherboard changed) because I slipped when hiking and it got dunked in water. The D70 did not survive 😅AFS still works fast in 2024
All of the 80 to 200 2.8 Nikon lenses are very underrated. That version being the sharpest of all of them BUT if that autofocus motor ever goes out, sadly they can't be replaced. Motors for those lenses haven't been available for at least 10 years now.
Yeah, I think my AF motor is going out :( It's functioning but it's definitely wearing out and on it's last legs. Just not sure when it'll eventually happen. And yes, I agree with you that it's totally under rated!
@@BoostLeekdMedia Even without a supply of new AF motors, some camera service shops can clean/rebuild the existing motor. Also, some of the SWM motors get slow or squeaky if they've sat around unused a lot. Sometimes just some regular use and powering through the full focus range routinely can get them going like new again.
The two-ring 80-200 2.8 D (1997) is the way to go. No internal motors, just the “screwdriver” (still, this lens auto-focuses much faster than the push-pulls). And it had been manufactured till 2020! So some mint and even new copies are still available, they could work for another 20 years or so 😅
HI I HAVE THE NIKON AF-S 80-200 F/2.8 ED . OI USED IT ON MY OLDER NIKON F MF CAMERA WORKS GREAT JUST SWITCH THE LENS TO MF AND READY TO GO. WHEN I PICKED UP THE LENS CAME WITH THE BOX , CASE, HOOD. AND HAS THE GOLD RING. JUST WANTED TO SHARE. THANK YOU.
I've owned two of these and yesterday I ordered another regretting selling the other two, it is a fantastic lens for portraits/weddings, my advice is buy a good one and never part with it.
Agreed! Mine is definitely showing signs of slowing degrading :( But as you said, if I do find one that's in pristine condition, I might just get another one. :) Thank you for sharing.
The push-pull is great. I have the same and the image quality is wonderful. No need to upgrade in order to have a fancy stuff. As a matter of fact, I like old Nikkor manual lenses like 80-200 4.5N, 105mm 2.5 AI/AI-S, 50mm 1.8 AI/AI-S, or the 100mm 2.8 series e. It slow you down, you will take your time to make a better composition compared to "machine gunning"
Great video! I've noticed there are multiple variations in the 80-200 models. You have the push and pull, the AF-D version, the AF-S, and maybe even others I don't know about. Does anyone know if there is any difference in optical quality in these variations?
I have used the non-AFS version (non push-pull) and the copy I had wasn't as sharp as the AF-S model. Not sure if they did updates or it was the condition of the AF-D version I had but the AF-S version is significantly sharper. I think they definitely improved some glass optics from the push and pull to the AF-D version to the AF-S version.
Hey man! I just upgraded from the D750 to the Zf but I can’t make that lense to with the FTZ II adapter. Any recommendations???? I’m a missing something?
It should fit on the FTZ as the 80-200 2.8 is an F-mount lens. IF you have the Non-AFS model, it will mount on the FTZ but the Non-AFS model will not autofocus on the FTZ adapter.
Oh yes please. Damn sight better than the 70-200 sigma piece of pooh I have to put up with. 😭 I'm fed up with this nonsense of the latest is the best too. If I won a Z9 body only in a competition I'd sell straight off and buy F mount lenses for my baby, a very nice tripod and a D7200. 👍
Well actually a lot longer than 10 yesrs with the 80-200 going back at least 20 years or more , I had one of the orignol Push-Pulls. Don't get me wrong I have nearly all of the primes but when your photographing in a Dodgy area this lens makes a very good weapon, I think it came out in 1996-7. I waited for the price to drop but it didn't in fact it was so popular that for a few months it was on back order, Refused to get rid of it even when it came to a very messy separation from my ex I refused to point blank include any of my camera gear, There are some things you ho,d onto and others that you let go Notice I still have my Lens
I had two of those lenes. I love them both. Unfortunately, it's so difficult to get parts for it. Anyone here can assist that would be great. Once again, AMAZING LENS!!!
Totally agree with you about how amazing it is! It's also unfortunate that most of them are having Autofocusing issues because of the AF motor but, I think I'll still use it still because it's just an incredible lens. Thanks for sharing!
Its crazy how good the older lenses are too. I remember spotting someone using the 200 micro at a car event. Only seen one image from that photographer but that image was amazing.
was about to sell it, but after watching this and scrolling through the comments I decided to give it another chance. i have things to do with this lens, like take photos to my family playing football , and make money in some sports events.... i think.
I Super love your video Brother . I just have one concern Does it Work Well in sports Events? Mainly in Basketball and Using D3100 Body ? I badly need your Opinion 🙏
The lens will be excellent on the D3100. While the lens will perform great on the D3100, the D3100's autofocus is probably the only factor that could cause 'slower' autofocus. BUT, it's a great lens to use on the D3100.
hello. Newbie question, so when youre taking pics with this big lens, how do you hold the camera? I see the lens has a small foot on it- Do you hold that while shooting?
Usually, I will have my hand holding the 'zoom' grip before I take photos. You can use the lense's collar mount if you do not need to change the focal length. :)
This lens can make a nice pictures but when you shoot some three in wet conditions in a backgrounde it makes a lot of very sharp rings and you looses focus from the main part in the picture. Canon 70-200/2.8l is much better in this conditions na faster
Hello i love your video brother, can i ask you something ? I found in facebook marketplace the lens 80-200 but the push pull version & unfortunately the lens has fungus on it like bad fungus, if I clean the lens, does it affect the sharpness and also the results of the photos from the lens?
@@mr.j1593 I would watch these videos for cleaning tools and materials. It looks like they know what they're doing. th-cam.com/video/yRIn3clSSqg/w-d-xo.html
I HAVE THE SAME LENS THE ONE I PICKED UP CAME WITH THE BOX CARRYING CASE AND HOOD. THE AUTO FOCUS. IDOES ACT UP SOMETIMES. BUT ITS A NICE LENS WOULD WORK ON MY NIKON F MOUNT .WOULD SAY KEEP THE NIKON AF-S 80-200 F 2.8.D.
Hello! I have the Nikon Zf body and found the one touch (or push pull) version of this lens and wasn’t sure if it would work with that body. I do plan on getting the adapter anyways. If someone could help I’d greatly appreciate it!
The SWM has failed with my copy of this lens, and I am still trying to find either parts or someone to chek and fix it. Appreciate if anyone knows of a reputable repairer..
I have a 80-200 D Version of this Lens. I am very Happy with this Lens. I have used this lens with my D7000 and D850. The D version is a Screw Drive Lens. Not a problem for me as the D7000 and D850 have a Screw Drive. So, I can use the Auto Focus.
Can you please help me. I got this same lens and it says incompatible with D3400. I thought they are both F mount. I see 10 contacts on the lens but only 8 on the camera. Do i need an adapter to use the auto focus?
Not too sure. I thought most AF-S lenses will work with the newer bodies. I don't have a D3400 on hand to try it out, so hopefully someone can chime in and help.
Man, you must work out. Imagine combining this with a Nikon D3. Honestly speaking, I want this to add to my collection. I already have the Tamron 70 200 VC USD, and that lens is already awesome as it is especially with my D810. My gear head side just lust for this Nikon one.
@@BoostLeekdMedia I wanted to to like my D3 so much, but alas to me it was too heavy. My D810 and my D700 both with battery grips was a little lighter, and just right to me. I'm sure having this lens with my either my body would feel alright.
"Latest is greatest" people are morons with too much money and no taste or class. I've found this to be 100% true. I own an older version of this lens and I call it "sexy" (all my lens have names, like "animal", "the aristocrat", "plastic craptastic" etc, this one is "sexy"). It has this very subtle magical glowy softness yet is razor sharp in all the right places which makes all portraits look like they're straight out of 1980s glossy magazines. Remember, in those days there was no photoshop and lens had to have a character of their own which would produce specific results straight out of camera, and this lens was designed specifically for high-class portraits. As I said, I call it "sexy" and I've had no complaints about it. Especially for portraiture.
Thank you for sharing and 100% agree with you about the quality of the lens. This lens, as you said, definitely gives you unique results and it's one of the reasons why I love using it.
Of course, you can get the D screw drive version and never worry about the motor wearing out... These days, you're just getting a long term rental. Sad
You''re not wrong, haha! But yeah, my relative has the older AF-D (non-push & pull version) and it's still working phenomenally when I saw him using it this past weekend.
awesome ! the reason its heavy is the build quality. your images are amazing plus it was only 350 dollars? a real bargain !! it dont have vr??? hahahah you dont need it !! a very good buy .
I got mine used for $100USD. I've seen a lot on sale for under $150 from my local camera store. As for the VR, haha, yeah, some situations, I don't use it. Thanks!
New photographers think old lenses are "out of date" and "not good enough" for today's type of photography....not sure what that means but some photographers I have met in person have that thought process.
@@BoostLeekdMedia Well todays type of photography is the same as back in the day just the equipment isn't as simplistic now as it was back in my time, a really good example is VR on a Nikon lens. beginners and experienced shooters alike are convinced by the manufacturer and reviews that the only way to be able to achieve an ultra sharp image hand held with a lower shutter speed in lower light you need too use a VR lens which is a very expensive purchase when all you need to do is increase the weight of the rig your shooting with, More weight more stability
@@BoostLeekdMedia those idiots you stay away from I started with a d50 and did paid sports shooting for 2 years with it. I’ve shot and owned many cameras and lots of lenses over the years. My go to now is either the Nikon d700 with 80-200 or my canon r6 and whether focal length I need for the day. Getting out and taking good pictures is a lot better then what gear you own. On a computer screen side by side you can’t tell a difference between a d700 shot or the r6 shot except for the file size. Bottom line shut up go out and shoot. 👍🏻
For those having problems with the focus motor on this lens, there is an easy DIY fix that appears to be working for most. There is a ribbon that comes loose under the focus scale that is accessible under the focus rubber, plenty of videos on youtube showing how to easily do the fix yourself. Own this lens myself and love it.
Oh! I will have to check it out. Hopefully that helps. Thanks!!
I just bought that very lens in Carmarthenshire Cameras last month for £315. It's without doubt the sharpest lens I now own. Bolted onto my D500 and it makes for fantastic wildlife photography. One thing I've found since becoming interested in photography, there seems to be those who will have the latest and greatest everything (and don't hold back in telling everyone they need it too) and those who have some common sense.
I agree with u and had shot with that same combination you have. But if you're shooting birds in flight, you'll actually need the latest and greatest.
For 20 year sur I used the first push-pull version of this gem and I shot 300000 portraits coupled with my F4 then F5. Then I sold it 10 years ago for 250€ to a you fellow that wanted to start portrait photography. I rebought it 3 days ago after bring désappointes with the 70-300 f4,5 ( un crisp pics ). I am so happy to use it again on my Nikon Df. What à Marcel lois combo and the push-pull is so instinctive and quick to capture face emotions with a blured back ground and beautiful colors.
Very nice! I've heard many great things about the push-pull version as well. Thank you for sharing!
4 years ago, I sold my DSLR stuff to become mirrorless. 2 years ago, I returned to DSLR (D800 and D800E). One of the lenses I rebought, was this 80-200 ED. It is large and heavy BUT OPTICAL SUPERB. I compared it to the 85 1.8D and 1.8G to perhaps have a lighter and smaller option. Surprisingly, at f2.8 the 80-200 was sharper than both contestants and showed way less fringing and loss of contrast in back lighting situations than the 1.8D. If you find a copy with good glass and working AF, get it!
me too, i using this Lens, so shape & nice color.
Can you tell me if I need an adapter for this same lens on my d3400. Says incompatible
No adapter needed, AF-S 80-200 will fit and be fully functional on the D3XXX and D5XXX series of cameras. The older AF 80-200D lenses won't autofocus but otherwise work fine on those cameras.
I have the first AF version 80-200 2.8 push-pull since January 2022. It cost me 200€. It is heavy but it gives wonderful images. I had used it in concert, airshow, photoshoot and guess what : I use it manually like pro did it before and I have sharp images with my D5300. I don't feel the need to change only to have a newer version because it is already great wide open at 2.8. But it is so sharp between f/3,5 - 4. After I got my first full frame the Nikon D800, I was amazed by the pics I got with that 36MP
I understand the argument you had with that photographer. But it is khown that the autofocus of the AF-S 80-200 doesn't last long. This AF-S version has a defect.
Nevertheless it gives wonderful images even if used it manually. Hope that you will not encounter that problem
Nice! Thank you for sharing! Glad to know that you're getting those shots with the push-pull 80-200! I have a feeling that, eventually, I will have to use the manual focus but your success with the push-pull is giving me hope! I don't think I'll sell it as the glass is still in amazing condition. Again, thanks for sharing!
@@BoostLeekdMedia the AF, AF-D 2nd gen push-pull, AF-D 3rd gen with 2 rings have the same optical quality. Don't worry you have 2 rings with the AF-S and it is much better to set the zoom and the focus. Push-pull tend to creep.
Many photographers did not encounter those problems with the autofocus motor. I think that it will outlast all your bodies. Those things are tank.
Of course no need to sell because it is a wonderful lens. Me too I won't sell mine. Those old lenses will outlast all newer lenses that have many electronic stuffs inside them. Imagine those old Nikkor AI lenses and Pre-AI from 70-80s are still working. My push-pull version were manufactured between 1988-1992.
After 3 months using this lens, here are some pros and cons:
+ Sharp, sharp, at 200mm f2.8 it still sharp (pair with low mpx camera like D700, D3,...)
+ IQ overall is great, the lens has its character (color, bokeh, colour, ...)
+ Autofocus fast on D3, at 200mm it might suffer some hunting but not a big deal
+ The hold focus button is there, you can only find it on expensive lens
+ It look cool (yeah this is the main i reason i move from 85mm to telephoto, it look much cooler than the 80-200 III version)
- Draw attention, people sometime stare at you
- Autofocus rarely stop working even when you push down the focus button (to fix this, change to another focal lenght, focus then go back), it annoying but i can live with this
- Kind of useless tripod collar
- It freaking heavy, like why it so heavy compare to other 70-200mm lens out there
If you still hesistant to buy this lens cuz you here people say the autofocus goes out, just remember to use it frequently
Thanks for your insight and review! Appreciate it, for real!
70-200s are lighter cause it has more plastic parts over the 80-200s which has almost full metal parts
Which 70-200mm 2.8 lens is lighter? If I’m not mistaken they’re all approximately 1.5kg in weight.
Top notch lens, you bought one of the best! Bought mine new and it still works perfectly. Very very sharp with tremendous bokeh.
Thanks!! The sharpness and bokeh really surprised me as well
I just recently purchased the push/pull version of this and I absolutely love it. Don't accept bad advice like that mentioned. Not all of us were born into money. We live in a period where older great equipment that's fantastic, can be purchased at an affordable price.
I've heard many great things about the push and pull version as well. I might get one once it comes on sale locally here! Thank you for sharing :)
I have it too and love it! Do you have any other great budget lens recommendations?
I use the older version of this lens. It’s a fantastic piece of glass. There’s a reason Nikon still offered this lens new until last year.
Thank you for sharing! Glad to know you're still using the 80-200. I need to get my hands on the push and pull version.
@@BoostLeekdMedia it’s a really nice lens for the cost. I got mine for about $200 and have used it a ton. I just used it to shoot a wedding 2 weeks ago.
I use lenses and cameras that are between 10 and 45 years old and take amazing photos. You can have the latest kit but it all comes down to the photographers skill. I’ve been shooting for 35 years now and occasionally I still shoot and process my own film along with the digital stuff. I just purchased a spare one of these lenses in mint condition at a pawn shop last month for $250
Whoa! $250 for the 80-200 F/2.8 is an AMAZING deal. Thanks for sharing. Totally agree with you about the photographer's skill too! Well said!
I had the non-S version of this lens. It was superbly sharp. Some of the crispest images I've ever taken were with a D70 and D700 with that lens - I was just walking through LR Classic the other day and searched for that lens, and wishing I hadn't sold it to pay son's tuition during a period of unemployment on my part... that and my 20 D - RB67 with 2 lenses...
Nice! Glad you shared your experiences with that one.
You are a good dad man. Look at Used Photo Pro. That's where I got my push pull version.
I found someone selling this and I marked it, my ooinion about this lens is since this is a very old lens and very expensive on its time and that where I sudenly came up that theres only fewer people will use this on portrait today, so I will buy this since newer lenses of course are good but this will give more different vibe!
It's still an extremely capable lens too. As long as it's still in great shape, the lens is phenomenal.
Another question sir, will it work on specifically nikon z50?
I plan to use it on a viltrox nfz to my z50
I now use mirrorless, but this 80 to 200 is the only lens I kept. It hss rendering that is good for park and fantasy themed shoots.
I still use the non AF-S 2.8D version of this lens for portraits, where you don‘t want/need the „total sharpness“ of modern lenses 👍
Very nice! the 80-200 non af-s version was the lens that made me want to get this AF-S version. The 80-200 2.8 lenses are pretty under rated for what they are.
Thanks for sharing!
I have one of these in Mint condition , i bought it in NYC at B&H in 2001 , its really sharp, a nice lens
Nice! The NYC B&H is quite an experience. Totally agree with you about how sharp it is. Especially for it's age. Thanks for sharing!
Just keep in mind not all AFS lenses are the same. It may have the badge but build is greatly different. Still very nice find for $350 sheesh, that’s awesome for 2.8 and the range on fx/dx.
I have the old, pre D 80-200mm f2.8 push pull lens and I love it. Built like a tank and weighs just as much, but wow the image quality. The beast I have, I got for $150. Best money I ever spent. This lens on my D700 with an MB-D10 grip and I'm looking at 6 pounds of photographic joy.
Nice! Heard great things about the push and pull version. You got that one for a pretty nice deal! Thanks for sharing.
I have the previous
AF NIKKOR ED 80-200mm f/2.8D which is equally good!
Nice! That 80-200 (non-AFS) was the one that made me tune into the AF-S model since it was the model that I first used. Totally agree with you about how GOOD that lens is as well.
I have had this lens for about 15 years now. I also have the very, very rare manual focus 80-200mm 2.8 (1,9kg!) and some more modern 70-200mm 2.8's.
Pro's ; on FX+DX; very sharp, almost no CA and the huge sun shade is great for taking pictures when it's snowing. Con's; heavy and difficult to turn focus/zoom (big).
Only on the D850 you start to see the age of this lens (resolving details gets difficult).
At the time, it came together with the 28-70mm 2.8 (same pro's and con's) The follow up of this lens and the first version of the 70-200mm was good on DX but was REALLY terrible on FX.
I will never sell this 80-200 AF-S underdog.
Thanks for sharing Peter! Glad to know you still have yours.
Brother, All my lenses are old but there gold!!! I just got a Nikon 28-85, and a ProMaster for Nikon 28-300!! Forget the hype of getting the latest!!! You have a dope great lens my man!! Plus I love your old Nikon gear!!! Keep shooting bro!!!😁😁👍🏾📷📷
Thanks!!!
You right I buy a lot of second hand lenses ...yes and they work well good enough for me.
I just bought a near mint copy of this lens . Awaiting its arrival in the post at some point tomorrow . Reviews are very good and I will use it along with a 16 - 35 f4 Nikkor on a D810 , as required for varying subjects .
It is really good for it's age. One thing that surprised me was how sharp it was. I think mine is running on luck since the autofocus is beginning to not properly function at times. But it's a nice one. Enjoy it with your amazing D810!
People just need good things, you know. Most photographers always recommend new items or good items. But it is based on our subject. I like old items because mostly I take still photos so I can spend time adjusting the lens or camera. Even sometimes I make photos look like old generation photos.
Hmm put that on your Z6 with FTZ adapter gives you about 18". At around 5 pounds that's quite a defensive weapon if you ever needed it.
Thanks for the video
True! Haha.
Haha! With a camera strap, it's got some added range lol
It's an amasing lens! The results are amasing for something this cheap, the sharpness is great, focus speed is ok, I don't have big expectations for it, so I don't mind it. It's big and heavy, but it's a tank and I love it I will never sell it, it's just something you should have even though you have the 70-200. It's a badass lens!
100% agree with you. Thanks for sharing!
@@BoostLeekdMedia Thanks for taking the time to reply!
Had this lens for around ten years and its one of my go to lenses its a tank but superb piece of glass
Dang! 10 years! Thanks for sharing. Totally agree with you about it being a tank.
I've got the Nikon Zoom Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8 D that was manufactured in 1993-1997. This jewel is made almost entirely of metal and is precision made in Japan, not offshored to the lowest bidder. It's optically magnificent, its weight and balance are perfect, materials, fit, finish, shape and form are all a pleasure to use with the Nikon F5. This particular lens model does not have tripod collar and I like it that way. Incredible lens! Will never sell this jewel! BTW, most of the professional photographers that used Nikon cameras used this lens in the 90s. No wonder.
Thank you for sharing!
Hi! Planning to get this lens. Good reviews though, older version. The price is reasonable, this days. Will be faster with the silent motors. Olders lens have there own kind of rendetion in the pictures you take. Like the Golder era, of movies ,songs and cars.. lol.. Thanks for the video. Keep up the good work.
Thanks for the kind words! Much appreciated. And I totally agree with you about the older lenses having their own "look" :)
The best version of this lens is the 4th version. The one that was called "new". It was the final screw drive version with internal focus, rather than the push pull versions, prior. Optically, they're the same but internal focus, you don't suck in dust over time. That version is the final version before they went to 70-200. The problem with that lens is, those first gen AF-S motors are failure prone (like in the 28-70mm 2.8; "The Beast".) If you can buy one with an already broken AFS motor, so the price is right for manual lens, then can be a good way to go. Especially for mirrorless or low end DSLR without the drive motor anyway but if you want the ideal copy, the "new" version (with two rings) is the best. I'd say the older push/pull are second best. Followed by an already broken first gen AFS. The reason I wouldn't buy one of those still working is, you'll pay too much and might have a broken (manual focus only) lens within a year anyway.
Optically, they're all PRO grade! Everyone w/ a DSLR should have one.
100% agreed with you. Thank you for sharing! Unfortunately, mine is beginning to no autofocus unless I move it physically a certain way and the AF will work immediately. But, as you said, in manual mode, it will still produce really nice images.
I have the generation one above that , and yes it is a very heavy lens , coupled to my Nikon F4 , I do believe the lens is a little bit heavier than the Nikon 4 I have
It is a VERY heavy lens. But it feels and produces amazing images for it's age too.
I bought this lens when it first came out in like 98 or 99. I love that lens! It is packed with ED elements. The only issue is the SWM. Once it starts to squeal, it is a sign the motor is dying. All Nikon SWM lenses squeal and die. I hate that. :/ You know that crazy thing is the Nikon internal motor lenses all seem to have a motor that fails. However, I have to say I have never ever had a camera screwdrive servo motor die. As a consequence, I find myself buying older screwdrive D series lenses. I am not doing sports or anything so I don't need ultra fast AF. As long as SWM are still available for repairs, I say keep using that lens!
Thanks! I'm going to keep using it, even after the motor fails.
@@BoostLeekdMedia I'm pretty replacement motors are still available. It's a great lens!
I bought this sometime back when D70s was current.. circa 2012?, used it on D90 and now on a Sony A7iii via the Viltrox adapter and it still works great. IBIS has given this great piece a total revival lol. I had it overhauled before by Nikon (motherboard changed) because I slipped when hiking and it got dunked in water. The D70 did not survive 😅AFS still works fast in 2024
Wow, after all of that, it's still working, haha. That's an awesome story. Thank you for sharing! It's still my go-to F/2.8 zoom lens. :)
All of the 80 to 200 2.8 Nikon lenses are very underrated. That version being the sharpest of all of them BUT if that autofocus motor ever goes out, sadly they can't be replaced. Motors for those lenses haven't been available for at least 10 years now.
Yeah, I think my AF motor is going out :( It's functioning but it's definitely wearing out and on it's last legs. Just not sure when it'll eventually happen. And yes, I agree with you that it's totally under rated!
@@BoostLeekdMedia Even without a supply of new AF motors, some camera service shops can clean/rebuild the existing motor. Also, some of the SWM motors get slow or squeaky if they've sat around unused a lot. Sometimes just some regular use and powering through the full focus range routinely can get them going like new again.
they still have motors for the 28-75 ?
im sure you could get one .
The two-ring 80-200 2.8 D (1997) is the way to go. No internal motors, just the “screwdriver” (still, this lens auto-focuses much faster than the push-pulls). And it had been manufactured till 2020! So some mint and even new copies are still available, they could work for another 20 years or so 😅
HI I HAVE THE NIKON AF-S 80-200 F/2.8 ED . OI USED IT ON MY OLDER NIKON F MF CAMERA WORKS GREAT JUST SWITCH THE LENS TO MF AND READY TO GO. WHEN I PICKED UP THE LENS CAME WITH THE BOX , CASE, HOOD. AND HAS THE GOLD RING. JUST WANTED TO SHARE. THANK YOU.
Niiiice! My gold ring on my 80-200 AFS is missing :( But it is still functional. Images from it are superb! Thank you for sharing tonylopez2424!
I've owned two of these and yesterday I ordered another regretting selling the other two, it is a fantastic lens for portraits/weddings, my advice is buy a good one and never part with it.
Agreed! Mine is definitely showing signs of slowing degrading :( But as you said, if I do find one that's in pristine condition, I might just get another one. :) Thank you for sharing.
its such a pure lens you get many great shots from this lens
It really is. I REALLY enjoy using this lens whenever I can. Image quality from it is still insanely good.
i use the push and pull version of this on my D7100, and im doing high school sports and concerts🤣
The push-pull is great. I have the same and the image quality is wonderful. No need to upgrade in order to have a fancy stuff. As a matter of fact, I like old Nikkor manual lenses like 80-200 4.5N, 105mm 2.5 AI/AI-S, 50mm 1.8 AI/AI-S, or the 100mm 2.8 series e. It slow you down, you will take your time to make a better composition compared to "machine gunning"
Great video! I've noticed there are multiple variations in the 80-200 models. You have the push and pull, the AF-D version, the AF-S, and maybe even others I don't know about. Does anyone know if there is any difference in optical quality in these variations?
I have used the non-AFS version (non push-pull) and the copy I had wasn't as sharp as the AF-S model. Not sure if they did updates or it was the condition of the AF-D version I had but the AF-S version is significantly sharper.
I think they definitely improved some glass optics from the push and pull to the AF-D version to the AF-S version.
@@BoostLeekdMedia thanks!
Hey man! I just upgraded from the D750 to the Zf but I can’t make that lense to with the FTZ II adapter. Any recommendations???? I’m a missing something?
It should fit on the FTZ as the 80-200 2.8 is an F-mount lens. IF you have the Non-AFS model, it will mount on the FTZ but the Non-AFS model will not autofocus on the FTZ adapter.
Oh yes please. Damn sight better than the 70-200 sigma piece of pooh I have to put up with. 😭
I'm fed up with this nonsense of the latest is the best too.
If I won a Z9 body only in a competition I'd sell straight off and buy F mount lenses for my baby, a very nice tripod and a D7200. 👍
Well actually a lot longer than 10 yesrs with the 80-200 going back at least 20 years or more ,
I had one of the orignol Push-Pulls.
Don't get me wrong I have nearly all of the primes but when your photographing in a Dodgy area this lens makes a very good weapon,
I think it came out in 1996-7. I waited for the price to drop but it didn't in fact it was so popular that for a few months it was on back order,
Refused to get rid of it even when it came to a very messy separation from my ex I refused to point blank include any of my camera gear, There are some things you ho,d onto and others that you let go Notice I still have my Lens
Thank you for sharing your experiences with the lens! It's one lens I don't think I'll ever sell.
I own one and love it!
Thanks for sharing!
I had two of those lenes. I love them both. Unfortunately, it's so difficult to get parts for it. Anyone here can assist that would be great. Once again, AMAZING LENS!!!
Totally agree with you about how amazing it is! It's also unfortunate that most of them are having Autofocusing issues because of the AF motor but, I think I'll still use it still because it's just an incredible lens. Thanks for sharing!
I had this lens it was a heavy sucker got great photos with it just went to a lighter setup.
Good to know and thanks for sharing!
It's not old depending on photographer. I have 200mm micro one . I have to say absolutely amazing but the only problem is heavy lens .
Its crazy how good the older lenses are too. I remember spotting someone using the 200 micro at a car event. Only seen one image from that photographer but that image was amazing.
was about to sell it, but after watching this and scrolling through the comments I decided to give it another chance. i have things to do with this lens, like take photos to my family playing football , and make money in some sports events.... i think.
2,5 kg with my D700 it's nothing!!!!!!
Don't sell it because to get the same optical quality in a new lens will cost about seven times what you'll get for your lens on the used market.
I Super love your video Brother . I just have one concern Does it Work Well in sports Events? Mainly in Basketball and Using D3100 Body ? I badly need your Opinion 🙏
The lens will be excellent on the D3100. While the lens will perform great on the D3100, the D3100's autofocus is probably the only factor that could cause 'slower' autofocus. BUT, it's a great lens to use on the D3100.
I was interested initially in this lens but then I found a 70-80 2.8 VR (I) second hand for 500€ and it was a no brainer
Crazy to see the prices on the 70-200 2.8 VR1 fall, too!
It’s a great lens. It’s not made of plastic like a lot of the new lenses.
It truly is. I really like how sturdy this lens feels.
Great. Keep em coming. Thanks.
You bet!
hello. Newbie question, so when youre taking pics with this big lens, how do you hold the camera? I see the lens has a small foot on it- Do you hold that while shooting?
Usually, I will have my hand holding the 'zoom' grip before I take photos. You can use the lense's collar mount if you do not need to change the focal length. :)
@@BoostLeekdMedia Thanks=D I always worry that the lens will try to move while I'm holding it... or do they not work that way?
@@natestarot it won't move :) The zooming with the lens is very easy and it won't move unless you make it move.
Brilliant lens second only to the 70-200
It really is. Still amazed at how well it performs.
This lens can make a nice pictures but when you shoot some three in wet conditions in a backgrounde it makes a lot of very sharp rings and you looses focus from the main part in the picture. Canon 70-200/2.8l is much better in this conditions na faster
Hello i love your video brother, can i ask you something ?
I found in facebook marketplace the lens 80-200 but the push pull version & unfortunately the lens has fungus on it like bad fungus, if I clean the lens, does it affect the sharpness and also the results of the photos from the lens?
if you clean it properly, its possible the sharpness and image quality could be better.
@@BoostLeekdMedia what chemical do i need to clean it ?
@@mr.j1593 I would watch these videos for cleaning tools and materials. It looks like they know what they're doing.
th-cam.com/video/yRIn3clSSqg/w-d-xo.html
Does the Z system provide it with image stabilisation? Just a thought I had...
If I remember correctly, as long as it's an AF-S lens, you will get some sort of image stabilization.
Good for Sports(D300s)?
100%, especially on the D300s.
I HAVE THE SAME LENS THE ONE I PICKED UP CAME WITH THE BOX CARRYING CASE AND HOOD. THE AUTO FOCUS. IDOES ACT UP SOMETIMES. BUT ITS A NICE LENS WOULD WORK ON MY NIKON F MOUNT .WOULD SAY KEEP THE NIKON AF-S 80-200 F 2.8.D.
Thanks for sharing!
Hello! I have the Nikon Zf body and found the one touch (or push pull) version of this lens and wasn’t sure if it would work with that body. I do plan on getting the adapter anyways. If someone could help I’d greatly appreciate it!
Does not work on mirrorless I'm afraid..
Apparently it does,false info from a camera shop Dohhhh...
The SWM has failed with my copy of this lens, and I am still trying to find either parts or someone to chek and fix it.
Appreciate if anyone knows of a reputable repairer..
I hope someone does as well. Mine is definitely on it's last legs unfortunately.
Sir, can i use that 80-200 lens with my Nikon D90 ?
Yes, you can! :)
Please recommend adapter to make this lens autofocus with D3100 body.
This lens should autofocus with the D3100. Just make sure the 80-200 you get, is the AF-S model.
bought magic draipipe for 300 cant what to try it
I have a 80-200 D Version of this Lens. I am very Happy with this Lens. I have used this lens with my D7000 and D850. The D version is a Screw Drive Lens. Not a problem for me as the D7000 and D850 have a Screw Drive. So, I can use the Auto Focus.
Thanks for sharing!
Can you please help me. I got this same lens and it says incompatible with D3400. I thought they are both F mount. I see 10 contacts on the lens but only 8 on the camera. Do i need an adapter to use the auto focus?
Not too sure. I thought most AF-S lenses will work with the newer bodies. I don't have a D3400 on hand to try it out, so hopefully someone can chime in and help.
it work with Nikon z6 II and ftz?
Yes! I just used it on my Z6 this past weekend :)
Man, you must work out. Imagine combining this with a Nikon D3. Honestly speaking, I want this to add to my collection. I already have the Tamron 70 200 VC USD, and that lens is already awesome as it is especially with my D810. My gear head side just lust for this Nikon one.
It is definitely a workout with the D3, haha! But the combo feels SO nice.
@@BoostLeekdMedia I wanted to to like my D3 so much, but alas to me it was too heavy. My D810 and my D700 both with battery grips was a little lighter, and just right to me. I'm sure having this lens with my either my body would feel alright.
Can you make a video on how to fix it if you getting a fee error message
What camera do you have?
this for full frame ?
You can use it for full frame and crop sensor cameras.
Can it fit to a d5100?
Yes, it will!
I have just bought one cant wait to try it out
Nice! Enjoy it! I love using this lens whenever I can!
do the push pull version
The ones around my town have all been in pretty bad shape. But I've seen many great images from them!
Does this work with a Nikon D800
Yes, it will :)
Great lens.
"Latest is greatest" people are morons with too much money and no taste or class. I've found this to be 100% true. I own an older version of this lens and I call it "sexy" (all my lens have names, like "animal", "the aristocrat", "plastic craptastic" etc, this one is "sexy"). It has this very subtle magical glowy softness yet is razor sharp in all the right places which makes all portraits look like they're straight out of 1980s glossy magazines. Remember, in those days there was no photoshop and lens had to have a character of their own which would produce specific results straight out of camera, and this lens was designed specifically for high-class portraits.
As I said, I call it "sexy" and I've had no complaints about it. Especially for portraiture.
Thank you for sharing and 100% agree with you about the quality of the lens. This lens, as you said, definitely gives you unique results and it's one of the reasons why I love using it.
Can this lens autofocus Available on FTZ ?
Yes, it can. Just make sure you get the 80-200 AF-S model.
Thank you！@@BoostLeekdMedia
Fantastic lens. Bonus it saves on gym fees.
Yes it does! Haha!
Of course, you can get the D screw drive version and never worry about the motor wearing out... These days, you're just getting a long term rental. Sad
You''re not wrong, haha! But yeah, my relative has the older AF-D (non-push & pull version) and it's still working phenomenally when I saw him using it this past weekend.
awesome ! the reason its heavy is the build quality. your images are amazing plus it was only 350 dollars? a real bargain !! it dont have vr??? hahahah you dont need it !! a very good buy .
I got mine used for $100USD. I've seen a lot on sale for under $150 from my local camera store. As for the VR, haha, yeah, some situations, I don't use it. Thanks!
.......... BEL VIDEO !!!! LIKE !!!!
Too old to use? what is that supposed to mean?
New photographers think old lenses are "out of date" and "not good enough" for today's type of photography....not sure what that means but some photographers I have met in person have that thought process.
@@BoostLeekdMedia Well todays type of photography is the same as back in the day just the equipment isn't as simplistic now as it was back in my time, a really good example is VR on a Nikon lens. beginners and experienced shooters alike are convinced by the manufacturer and reviews that the only way to be able to achieve an ultra sharp image hand held with a lower shutter speed in lower light you need too use a VR lens which is a very expensive purchase when all you need to do is increase the weight of the rig your shooting with, More weight more stability
I bought it back in 2004. It was one of the sharpen lens I ver had. I loved it a lot . Until it was stolen 🤐
Ah! that's a bummer! It definitely is still a VERY sharp lens to this day. Hope you can get your hands on one again.
🙏
❤❤❤
Guys i have nikon 850 this lens no working with my camera. Who understand about this?
Make sure you lock the aperture ring into the correct position to utilize the autofocus.
@@BoostLeekdMedia thank u a lot of
Does somebody used this w sony?
You will need a Sony to Nikon lens adapter. And then make sure that adapter will be able to utilize the autofocus.
Anyone here using this on FTZ Adapters?
Yes! I use it all the time on my Z6. And on my Z50 for the extra reach. :)
I like the noisy lens more😂
Haha. Same. That Autofocus winding up is something else! lol
@@BoostLeekdMedia I like its elder brother 70-210mm f/4 more, weight & budget wise.
@@raymondchan3587 oh! I think I'm going to get that lens. Heard many great things about that lens!
Lost me at 400 f4. Let him spend his coin and just nod and smile. Jog on kunt. I'd love a 400 2.8. Ain't happnin.
I have one in Iraq
Cash attitude does always not make great pics.
Agreed. I know some local photogs that believe having the latest and greatest gear will actually give you better images. *cringe*
@@BoostLeekdMedia those idiots you stay away from I started with a d50 and did paid sports shooting for 2 years with it. I’ve shot and owned many cameras and lots of lenses over the years.
My go to now is either the Nikon d700 with 80-200 or my canon r6 and whether focal length I need for the day.
Getting out and taking good pictures is a lot better then what gear you own. On a computer screen side by side you can’t tell a difference between a d700 shot or the r6 shot except for the file size.
Bottom line shut up go out and shoot. 👍🏻
My copy 😢kinda gave up on me ,I hope is not a full autofocus issue and is just the inside plastic ribbon ..🥹
Ahh, oh no. Mine is slowly getting to the end of it's stages too :/
is this work with D5000 series?
It will! Just make sure to test it out before you buy it. And, make sure it is the AF-S version.