Making a Jumping PCB Robot

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
  • My attempt at making a flexible PCB robot frog 🙃🐸 Help me make more projects by supporting me on Patreon 🠊 / carlbugeja
    PCB Manufacturer 🠊 www.pcbway.com
    PCB Design Software 🠊 carlbugeja.com/altium
    Free Version 🠊 www.altium.com/circuitmaker
    My Flexible PCB Actuators 🠊 flexar.io
    This project is Open-Source and licensed with Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License
    Cameras/Tools I use (affiliate links):
    Main Camera 🠊 amzn.to/30tRgY7
    Second Camera 🠊 amzn.to/2ZLm2wy
    Light Setup 🠊 amzn.to/3jtqckA
    Magnifying Lamp 🠊 amzn.to/3jrcaQv
    Vernier Caliper 🠊 amzn.to/3eTju3I
    Multi-meter 🠊 amzn.to/3hq6B2R
    Digital Milligram Scale 🠊 amzn.to/30HIw1X
    Website 🠊 carlbugeja.com
    TH-cam Channel 🠊 / carlbugeja
    Twitter 🠊 / bugejacarl
    Instagram 🠊 / bugeja.carl
    Facebook 🠊 / bugeja.carl
    Linkedin 🠊 / carl-bugeja-0b922a135
    Music:
    Carmelized - TH-cam Library
    AI 2 - TH-cam Library
    Ella Vater - TH-cam Library
    Not Impossible - TH-cam Library
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 431

  • @guatagel2454
    @guatagel2454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +280

    This "failures" are more interesting and usefull than a hundred success videos. Thank you!

    • @ofsanjay
      @ofsanjay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      True

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      the beauty of engineering comes from the failures 🙃

    • @somedudewithakeyboard
      @somedudewithakeyboard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Carl Bugeja pain and despair also come from failures :) Persistence and grit defy them.
      I was bricking DIY micro RC receivers for a year and couldn’t figure out why. Until I found a workaround for what seems like a hardware bug in my laptop.

    • @wondersofnature9939
      @wondersofnature9939 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarlBugeja give to me your wtsup number

    • @tristanhameleers7506
      @tristanhameleers7506 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True I mean another good example is electroboom he is also super deluxe funny

  • @weirdboyjim
    @weirdboyjim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    That's fantastic Carl! Have you thought of using opposing coils instead of permanent magnets? That might improve the power to weight ratio.

    • @ciarfah
      @ciarfah 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The mass of the magnet is what makes it jump

    • @ciarfah
      @ciarfah 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Never mind, I see what you mean. The battery mass is high enough that using just coils might work

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      thank you so much :) opposing two coils alone does not create a magnetic field strong enough to repel/attract them.. i have some tests coming up soon (next month or two) related to electromagnets that might give some more answers to this question

    • @macrumpton
      @macrumpton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Or maybe the coils can load a spring with a ratcheting action and then it can jump like a flea, maybe using the coil movements to steer while in the air.

    • @daneplummer5962
      @daneplummer5962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You might want to try putting a small platform in the centre of each coil (on the bottom) so that air can enter the space under the coil easier. Perhaps the small vacuum is holding it down?

  • @giuseppefesta3422
    @giuseppefesta3422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Hi Carl,i'd like to give you an advice about jumping, idk if you tried that before , but i noticed that one of the major problem of your design (still awesome, I was never able to do something similar and I'm following your journey with a lot of enthusiasm) is the very low potential elastic energy that the robot can accumulate during compression, this due the low elastic constant of the pcb material. I know that a spring effect would require bigger mag fields and so bigger coils and mags, but why not trying to exploit a capacitor discharge in combination with some lp boost converter in order to feed the coil with short pulses of relatively high voltage electricity. In this way, enhancing the elastic constant of the pcb using , for example, aluminium planar springs, you should be able to achieve better results without changing too much the size of your robot. Hope to be useful :)

    • @PixlRainbow
      @PixlRainbow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      does it work if you have stiffer metal springs that are _also_ coils? Aka they are coiled into a roughly conical shape and when a current is passed through them they compress themselves against the magnet.

    • @FredSena
      @FredSena 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Easy and free good test you can try is to add a second layer of coils to increase potential energy. Use also the arms to be more stiff - you already have many PCB's. so, why not?

    • @maibster
      @maibster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      terrible advice

    • @OnePunchHeizou
      @OnePunchHeizou 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you are right actually i was thinking the same way but the problem is the design itself even though we add springs to it still this design at current stage cannot work harsh but true. just some magnets pulling and pushing against each other wont do. first thing is we need a lot of force to jump which means we need potential energy storage like proper springs or rubber bands will also do. next we need a way to pump energy into them like the PCB linear actuator carl designed in his previous videos. next we need a lot of design improvement. i have a suggestion for carl he can use the PCB LA design to pull the springs from all sides towards the centre straining the springs and suddenly releasing them that should create enough force

    • @hummel911
      @hummel911 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So if you think about physics of jumping, you can't get more energy out of external energy harvesting.
      If you wan't a real jump, you need to meet the "sweet spot". In your case the moment when you can enforce the anti gravitational force in upward direction, when the inertia of the lifting motion is enough to pull the mass that is still on the ground.
      If you think of when you jump, you push yourself up. Right in the moment, when you feel gravitation less, you pull your legs to yourself. This order is a case for control algorithms. The problem you disrespect with fixed/variable frequencys for proof of concept, is that the actual momentum is not linear. It is by the power of 2 depending on time, its linear but not straight.

  • @mondair99
    @mondair99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I would love to see a version 2 (3)! Keep it up, you make excellent videos and you inspire me to graduate college (studying computer engineering, but EE was my first love)!

  • @anatoliytrifonov9812
    @anatoliytrifonov9812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Nice project. Do you ever tryed to pump negative signal thru the coils. In this case you can try to increase the reliasing force on the magnets. Force will push further the magnets.

  • @SadeXo1
    @SadeXo1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Do you considered air suction forces between coils and table ? Maybe try to run it on some kind mesh table (maybe speaker grill)

    • @jozefh3272
      @jozefh3272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I would suggest to add some legs to reduce vacuum under the coils.

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      that could be effecting yes and it would be an interesting test to make.. but i still would like it work on flat surfaces to be more "usefull"

    • @lcdvasrm
      @lcdvasrm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@CarlBugeja stick something below very light that at least lets air rush in. Like 4 small polystyrene balls. For next version, make a hole at the center for air inrush. You can't fight against one atm.

    • @hadtomakeachannel
      @hadtomakeachannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had similar thoughts to Norbert SadeXo.

    • @rossstapleton6419
      @rossstapleton6419 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      curious if you could take some inspiration from origami frogs? folded tabs off the main body could help solve this, plus give some extra lift?

  • @harveytaylor5045
    @harveytaylor5045 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    This would benefit form having Some feet as this will reduce the energy needed to jump due to less losses due to suction

    • @charetjc
      @charetjc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Use superglue and baking soda to build some nubs for feet?

    • @NicRobertsNerd
      @NicRobertsNerd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This so much, it seems to be stuck to the ground?

    • @cameronbehar7358
      @cameronbehar7358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or at least holes in the bottom PCB to allow some airflow.

  • @AJITHNKALE-cg5qk
    @AJITHNKALE-cg5qk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was recommended by TH-cam and I’m so glad it did. This is so cool! Pls make a version 2

  • @andreyv3609
    @andreyv3609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is so cool! The thing I would do is to double, triple, etc. stack the coils - the primary source of the filed/force. Also, don't think you need wide coil, but stacking as high as possible with low/similar to magnets' diameter. Thanks for the videos!

  • @IgnacioMoya
    @IgnacioMoya 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's amazing seeing your robots evolve and improve with time. Keep up your good work!

  • @Videohead-eq5cy
    @Videohead-eq5cy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Underrated engineering channel

  • @AmanSingh-hl6ib
    @AmanSingh-hl6ib 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for show the whole process...it really gives motivation

  • @nicklawton4166
    @nicklawton4166 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are going to succeed Carl, your ideas and projects are absolutely awe inspiring and innovative as hell

  • @Nono-hk3is
    @Nono-hk3is 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Yes please.
    Also, I'd love to see a video on your smt soldering technique. I noticed you used some tape on your stencil. Is that just to affix it to the ocb, or was it for clearance adjustment when you spread the solder paste?

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I did use tape for this video but its not the best way to do it.. maybe i will do a video on that topic someday :)

  • @malolan98
    @malolan98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey! I love these projects of yours! Don't give up! As an aspiring robotics engineer myself, I'd love to see you making more versions and more bots!

  • @timojansen3841
    @timojansen3841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see a working frogbot! 🐸 I really enjoyed seeing how you work with trial and error.

  • @AMalas
    @AMalas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What you need imo are longer legs that are way less stiff, this allows the magnet board to accelerate longer before pulling the coils

  • @waylontmccann
    @waylontmccann 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How about using more of a centipede like set up with smaller multi layer pads, and a tiny bar magnet instead of the leapfrog and button magnets? A sequential firing of the pads can be used to mimic the insects walking pattern...

    • @nefariousyawn
      @nefariousyawn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds awesome, and more doable than jumping.

  • @g-gon8869
    @g-gon8869 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You really are one heck of an expert in designing PCB's.I really want to learn to design PCB's like you

  • @MrVyxx7
    @MrVyxx7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazingly creative work, I would definitely like to see a version 2. I suspect you may be able to cleverly use the pcb material as a sort of spring to assist the hop. Perhaps reducing to 2 "legs" and putting 2 coils on each with a stiffer joint - the attraction of the first coil could pull a magent that was out of range into the attractive field of the second coil, kind of acting as a 2 stage arm of a lever allowing you to use the mechanical rigidity as a spring when you release/reverse the electromagnetic polarity.

  • @user-eh5zk5bb9k
    @user-eh5zk5bb9k 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This Frog is so cooool!!!!!! You are such a smart and cool guy!

  • @s.stefan6257
    @s.stefan6257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good job man, i rly enjoy your videos. i'm in my first year as an electrical engineering student and i find your videos as being rly inspirational

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you so much!! I'm glad you like them! :) good luck with your studies

  • @Schmogel92
    @Schmogel92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What happens when you make holes in the center? I think the foot area is so big that the outside air pressure makes it "stick" on the surface. You could also try a non flat surface where air can flow more freely, like a sponge or a wire mesh.
    You could also give the robot skids to stay off the ground.

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i'm not sure if making holes in the middle will resolve this issue but i agree that having a smaller foot area will yield better results

    • @Schmogel92
      @Schmogel92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarlBugeja It's all about better air flow underneath. It acts like a suction cup at the moment. I'm sure you'll come up with somethign great.

  • @sahasgembali2205
    @sahasgembali2205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes pls try version 2!
    Also, why use magnets?
    Why not use more coils on top and run the current in an opposite direction?
    You could reduce your overall weight this way.
    Granted you'd need more current to run all your coils, for which you could design some sort of capacitive circuit that can give short bursts of high current.

  • @sealpiercing8476
    @sealpiercing8476 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A bit of spring steel reinforcing the flex arms (maybe extending into springy legs) would let it store energy with each pulse and work up to higher jumps, as well as making the arms more robust.

  • @pramitchaudhury1821
    @pramitchaudhury1821 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work man love your work

  • @tomslater8374
    @tomslater8374 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i'd love to see a part 2

  • @milosdewit7562
    @milosdewit7562 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make a v3, it's an awesome project and you shouldn't give up! Keep it up!

  • @auriccarnage7388
    @auriccarnage7388 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I figured it would only bounce based on appearance alone; our ability to jump is amazing and takes a feat of evolution. It's one of our great advantages as human beings. Short of adding a spring, that thing is hardly going to be taking any substantial leaps. It's still fun to watch and see how adjusting frequency can produce such reactions. This video has definitely earned a like and save. keep doing what you do Carl!

  • @scruffy4525
    @scruffy4525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think that maybe changing the design to have some springs between the body and the feet and then using the coils and the magnets to compress those springs. Then release the magnets and the velocity gained from the springs could help it jump.

  • @cobralyoner
    @cobralyoner 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this kinda stuff. it’s so interesting to see people innovate new weird things. subscribed (:

  • @Culturedropout
    @Culturedropout 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's pretty interesting so far. Maybe putting the heavy part _down_ instead of _up_? Would that allow it to get more travel (and thus accelerate) before it has to pull the whole mass along? As it is, it starts under maximum load, so it doesn't build up much momentum. Just making this up as I go along, so take it with a grain (or a shaker) of salt. Just a gut feeling. Or, could you make it tumble instead of hop? Make it a little more spherical in shape and then it could selectively shift the center of gravity by pulling the magnets to one side until it rolled over? Your ability to design and build tiny little intricate things like this always amazes me, and your obviously enthusiasm for the subject matter make your videos a real treat to watch. Take care, and good luck!

  • @couldhaveseenit
    @couldhaveseenit 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this project and really interested to see a v2! Another idea, maybe you could ditch the battery and use your existing coils as a wireless charging receiver for a capacitor instead

  • @miltonmartins8217
    @miltonmartins8217 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the 4 cables has a spring effect try changing material for harder springer effect, then the frequency will change too. It's working as a mechanical oscillator, you might get higher more powerful jumps.

  • @tonysparc5322
    @tonysparc5322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Altium and Keil - good choise! Very interesting

  • @multiplysixbynine
    @multiplysixbynine 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think you could achieve directional control using just one centrally located magnet and three “steering coils” positioned a little off axis. Because the steering coils are not directly in line with the magnet, they will exert a lateral force upon the magnet and a corresponding movement in the opposite direction while jumping.
    To reduce size and save weight, the coils can be made into wedges that meet in the center of the PCB instead of being circular.
    As a further refinement, it might be possible to design a hybrid system consisting of one large outer coil to provide most of the loft for jumping wrapped around three smaller inner coils that add an asymmetric steering force as previously described.

  • @hasnihossainsami8375
    @hasnihossainsami8375 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aside from jumping, the fact that this robot was drifting can still be used to your advantage. A robot that can move around with no mechanical or moving parts can still be very useful in certain scenarios.

  • @Abrar_Ashraf
    @Abrar_Ashraf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, you should make 4 flexible arms more rigid so when it releases from magnetic will take a high jump.

  • @harshadpomal6493
    @harshadpomal6493 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You Working Hard You Deserve More than TH-cam

  • @pierdolio
    @pierdolio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like your persistence. Consider introducing a texture to the underside of the pads so it doesn’t have to overcome a vacuum when leaving the surface. Keep trying.

  • @ishigamiyu1991
    @ishigamiyu1991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got no recommendations but I just wanna say your projects are awesome

  • @OnePunchHeizou
    @OnePunchHeizou 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i think you should combine this with something like shape memory alloys for example nitinol or maybe design a actuator that can store potential energy like springs. just replace those 4 ends of the pcb with springs and this combined with your mechanism or the SMA mechanism should provide many times more jumping force than you have now.

  • @jhoughjr1
    @jhoughjr1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks like you could get height by controlling the coils more finely. fire one set, then the other set allowing it to lever forward a bit. ie kicks up on hind legs, then fires off with the front legs.

  • @markadyash
    @markadyash 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yes please make version 2

  • @chibiconsulting
    @chibiconsulting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you tried to increase the magnetic flux capacity of the coils themselves? Try using a ferrite paint on one side of a coil and see if that helps.

  • @undersky596
    @undersky596 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love it!

  • @jeremy6844
    @jeremy6844 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:27 is full on terror mode.

  • @AdityaPrakash-kt3rf
    @AdityaPrakash-kt3rf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really cool idea! Would definitely love to see the next version. How about making flippers using these actuators?

  • @EfieldHfield_377
    @EfieldHfield_377 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting and fun project.

  • @el_ingefigue
    @el_ingefigue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The principles of this technology is very important, You could investigate how you can apply in the microrobotics. of medical applications.

  • @bhavyaharjai1735
    @bhavyaharjai1735 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey carl, here are the things that I would do differently for this particular design:
    1. Use a piece of iron at the center of the coils, which would not only help in increasing the magnetic field but also will help with the weight distribution.
    2. Make the length of the connector even longer to give more headspace for the magnets to move.
    3. Use a higher grade of neodymium magnets.

  • @vozdefuegobomber9619
    @vozdefuegobomber9619 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    use a velcro pad at the base. This will help the vibration advance and slide on the road in one direction. you would only have to control the direction

  • @gokalpcetin4763
    @gokalpcetin4763 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think if you increase the number of coils instead of decreasing them, it has a higher chance to succeed. Don't forget that you have a first prototype that can jump more or less as you wanted(at least in height) with only one coil and no battery, so you know that one coil can compensate for the electronics that make it work, if you want to also have the battery onboard you need to increase the number of coils (maybe like 8 coils in two coils per leg configuration for example) so that it can compensate for the weight of the battery. Keep trying it is a fun and teaching journey for all of us :D Great work!

  • @r_atharv11
    @r_atharv11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    People in 2000 : we will have flying cars in 2020
    Meanwhile 2020 : jumping frog go brrrrrrrrr

  • @Bobur1777
    @Bobur1777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glue on some thin plastic stiffener on the legs. Trace out the bottom 4 circles and the legs. This shouldn't add much weight, but it'll give some rigidity and high spring tensions. You know those hard plastic packages where they melt the borders shut, the ones notorious for being hard to open. I forget what they are called. Or grab some thin vacuum forming plastic sheets and cut that out. Maybe some projector plastic sheets? Idk if they are still around :D

  • @nixonnelson5181
    @nixonnelson5181 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can integrate the bluetooth chip directly on the pcb right the extra weight of the the bluetooth pcb will also affect the jump or you can make a small spy radio module which will eliminate the chip completely

  • @micnor14
    @micnor14 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm interested in seeing where this goes but man I don't expect much more of a jump with these magnets. My thoughts
    1) The resistance to flipping magnetic fields is significant at this small a scale
    2) Diminishing returns after 2 or 3 magnets/coils
    3) You're losing some inertia to the dampening effect of the flexible PCB
    4) The only way you're going to get the weight down with these materials is with fewer components and less soldier
    5) Your idea might have some broader application at a larger scale. Build a monster sized one might give you some ideas :D

  • @staratmidnight7
    @staratmidnight7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you considered using a different waveform to drive the coils? Sine and sawtooth curves arise more commonly in oscillation functions, and may yield better results.

  • @FuriousTesla117
    @FuriousTesla117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One problem I see is that there is a "giant suction cup" on the bottom. Could be causing a huge loss due to the viscosity of air, the relative flatness of both the PCB and the surface it is on. You might try reversing the setup, magnets on bottom coils on top or to add standoffs (maybe headder pins) on the base.

  • @selmankurt
    @selmankurt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Haha even if we say no i am pretty sure you have already started designing the next version. You are determined enough to beat all the issues and this is why you will be successful bro

  • @max80943
    @max80943 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe the problem is the big flat surface of the coils. It air can t flow fast enough under the coils. So it creates suction. It is like you try to pick up something flat (like a sheet of glas) from a flat surface. The faster you try, the harder it gets. It may be an idea to make little dots under the coils or to fold them a little bit. This will reduce the amount of the planar area of the coils. I hope this helps

  • @shivakumara0749
    @shivakumara0749 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey i think may be changing the pulse width to the coil while repelling would work

  • @agoes45
    @agoes45 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @skyflyhigh111
    @skyflyhigh111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful

  • @dimitrioskokkinos3316
    @dimitrioskokkinos3316 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Carl! Just stumbled to your channel and saw this frog project. You are very skilled and you have really grate and creative ideas! Keep going! Though there is a drawback in your designing process. You have to pay more attention in the physics of your projects. For example, here, you have a really large flat surface (quad coil system) pushing on your desk. This works as a suction cup and your system struggles to detach from the desk. Try to attach 4 polystyrene foam hemispheres under each coil. Also, try when you design the PCBs to take in to account the moment of inertia on the primary axis you will be using or at least try to spread symmetrically your components in order not to have to re-calibrate the whole system. Finally, for the specific project try to determine the "force" or the weight a single coil can elevate and how far (hang your magnet from a string right above a single coil and play with the coil strength and extra weight on the magnet). I hope that helps a bit. Nice videos! ;-)

  • @jamesrosssharp
    @jamesrosssharp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah v2 go for it!

  • @luismlc89
    @luismlc89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you should try with a larger disk magnet

  • @Sergiuss555
    @Sergiuss555 หลายเดือนก่อน

    increasing the number of coils may be beneficial. While the battery may also increase, the control circuit portion in the whole device will become smaller.

  • @dmytroi5456
    @dmytroi5456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most complex promotion of flexible PCBs manufacturer ever)

  • @Udo-Nbg
    @Udo-Nbg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    314/5000
    a great project.
    I think you have three serious problems:
    1. the conductor track width, this limits the current flow and thus the magnetic field strength
    2. the large base, perforate it so that the air can flow faster between the base and the board
    3. As already mentioned, the spring force

  • @fluiditynz
    @fluiditynz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You've got a few things going on there. I would place some air holes through your coil designs for starters, there is too much flat area needing a big air inrush for a snappy jump response. Also, I would find the jumping frame resonant frequency, run it at that frequency for movement and then slide the coils on intended motion axis oppositely out of phase from the other coils, each other for effective movement. Think more kangaroo than frog.

  • @laharl2k
    @laharl2k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imo it needs more current. Say add a 50-75C smaller lipo baterry and up the current but with a shorter duty cycle. Or have rwo settings, low current for compression and a high current pulse for decompression.
    Also flatter magnets would also help as you dont even have a flux ring around it so after it separates from te coil the flux loses are huge, thats why im sugesting doing a say, 15-20A pulse, to concentrate all the power while the magnets are close to the coils

  • @mubbashirshirazi3758
    @mubbashirshirazi3758 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    do make a part 2 of this robot try adding few more layers in coil to reduce the overall resistance and to increase the magnetic pulling strength and also make the frog arms more stiffer

  • @vasanthsreeram
    @vasanthsreeram 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magnet at the bottom coil on top. Like a pogo stick the rubber feet would be the magnet the outer tube would be the coil. The coil would need a Center hole for a stabiliser rod that connects to the magnet at the bottom. The whole unit will be able to operate without flexible pcb I think and will jump with the weight of the pcb and the battery.

  • @interet-sanginteressant1756
    @interet-sanginteressant1756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should add some little springs between the top and bottom part

  • @dancollins1012
    @dancollins1012 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember that not all actuators/motors need permanent magnets. For this weight critical application, replace the magnets with top side coils. I also recommend investing time to find a higher energy density (watts per kg) energy storage system... supercapacitors have 2-20 times higher energy density than batteries

  • @xonnn5441
    @xonnn5441 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Proset Carl. Keep it up!

  • @anarquay5581
    @anarquay5581 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes please make a version 2

  • @macrumpton
    @macrumpton 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perhaps separating the jumping from the steering might help? maybe one coil moves the magnet up and another moves it sideways to turn. Also, I was impressed with the sliding the device did by pumping the air underneath it. Maybe a sort of ornithopter hovercraft might be more promising?

  • @HariWiguna
    @HariWiguna 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool idea! I woul have thought four coils would make it jump higher too, but I guess magnets and battery are quite heavy. Would there be enough power to double-up the coils (underneath for a total of 8 coils)? Or would the additional weight eliminates the benefit of stronger electromagnets?

  • @sajalacharjee7008
    @sajalacharjee7008 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool

  • @among-us-99999
    @among-us-99999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    just a thought, could you use the actuator coil for inductive energy transfer?

  • @carlvanheezik263
    @carlvanheezik263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You could try if increasing the magnetic force helps. Add some metal to the coils. You could try to paint it with magnetic paint. It contains small metal particles. It will increase the weight of the feet, but metals are known to increase the field strength in the order of 1000.

  • @ianstubbington2334
    @ianstubbington2334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this. You DEFINITELY need to make a next version. I cant wait ti see it. Is there any way to get a smaller, lighter battery, i feel thats what is letting you down.

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thanks!! it very hard to find reliable lipos with low mass and high discharge current rating

  • @nathaniellangston5130
    @nathaniellangston5130 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should try using some sort of Lipo watch battery! You obviously wouldn't get all that much run time, but it might have the perfect amount of mass for higher jumps!

  • @lutfijd
    @lutfijd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you considered using smaller magnets that arranged in a halbach array kind of configuration? might give you same magnetic power with lower weight.

  • @mrmarkom
    @mrmarkom 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course we would like to see new version. Btw, is it not possible to have version with PCB coils only (without magnets)? It seems to me it would be less powerful, but also much lighter..

  • @CustomMaDe-eo2wx
    @CustomMaDe-eo2wx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting… my first idea if you do a version 2 of it would be to place a hole in the middle of the coils… at least in the space between the 4 coils. Reduce the air pressure on the base plate.

  • @cattharsis
    @cattharsis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you vary the frequencies individually for the bridges? Maybe doing something like tank controls by varying frequencies in pairs to have direction?

  • @182mdavi
    @182mdavi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bonne idée pour un cadeau :) interesting concept

  • @NeuroneLibero
    @NeuroneLibero 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have to increase the grip of the foot on the table putting a thin sponge under the coils.

  • @patprop74
    @patprop74 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As they say, there is no success without failure, however, I like to think failures, are learning curves, If anyone stands a chance at making a digital jumping frog, it is you!

  • @sasha_beliu
    @sasha_beliu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    May be it is possible to get to point of resonance in order to improve the max height

  • @codebeat4192
    @codebeat4192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think a big problem are the 'massive' and solid coils on the bottom, it is actually a solid plate, no air can go thru it. When it tries to jump it moves air that wants to push it down, a resistance. When released, same story, it pushes away the air between the plate and the table surface, again a resistance. It is now acting like a speaker cone. Maybe you can add some vent holes, air leaking points, that reduces the amount of air to move. You can test personally by taking a solid plate and try to jump with the plate. Almost impossible. After this take a plate with many holes in it and try to jump again. Much easier! Notice: I am not responsible for any injury performing these tests. :-P ;-)

  • @paulopreuss1297
    @paulopreuss1297 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The coil have big surface area, so the air generate resistance while it jump, you should invert the position of the magnets and put te coils under the battery

  • @werdna5559
    @werdna5559 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    maybe try to make more windings on the bottom coils would make it more powerful

  • @michaelnaughtin4047
    @michaelnaughtin4047 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you taken into account the airflow? Lifting the large footprint vertically up from a flat surface creates a pressure difference and a sort of vaccum underneath keeping the coils stuck to the ground. I would suggest drilling some air holes in the centre of the coils so that as the coils lift air can enter through the centre and not just from the sides.
    I’ve done a terrible job explaining this but I’ll give another example. A piece of paper flat on a table... it’s difficult to lift it vertically up, but easier to peel it up wards from one side to allow the air to fill the space you are creating.
    Either way try drilling an air hole in the bottom panel:)

  • @luked9301
    @luked9301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was interesting. however have you considered not using magnets at all? use coils on top as well?

  • @TheMechatronicEngineer
    @TheMechatronicEngineer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you ever tried to power up the coils separating them from the jumping body to see how the 4 links influence the jump height?

  • @youssefaly97
    @youssefaly97 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about ditching the magnets and having two coils attract and repel each other. Maybe also add a DC DC boost converter onboard to get more current with more voltage