Debating Douglas Murray on Gender, Reparations, and Extinction Rebellion
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 พ.ค. 2024
- To support me on Patreon (thank you): / alexoc
To donate to my PayPal (thank you): www.paypal.me/cosmicskeptic
To purchase Cosmic Skeptic merchandise: cosmicskeptic.teemill.com/
-------------------------------------VIDEO NOTES-------------------------------------
Douglas Murray is a British conservative author and journalist, and associate editor of The Spectator. In 2017 Murray wrote The Strange Death of Europe, taking on the issue of the global immigration crisis, and now he returns with The Madness of Crowds, a book about identitarianism in four areas: 'gay', 'women', 'race' and 'trans'.
Douglas speaks to Alex about the logic of reparations and a retributive approach to historical injustice, as well as the nature of gender, and the advocacy tactics of the LGBT community.
-------------------------------------------LINKS--------------------------------------------
The Madness of Crowds: amzn.to/2ATd0Uk
The Strange Death of Europe: amzn.to/2rUsyCP
Murray with Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris at the O2 Arena, London: • Sam Harris vs Jordan P...
CNN LGBT town hall: • Transgender woman make...
----------------------------------------CONNECT-----------------------------------------
My Website/Blog: www.cosmicskeptic.com
SOCIAL LINKS:
Twitter: / cosmicskeptic
Facebook: / cosmicskeptic
Instagram: / cosmicskeptic
Snapchat: cosmicskeptic
The Cosmic Skeptic Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
---------------------------------------CONTACT------------------------------------------
Email (business only please): cosmicskeptic@gmail.com
Or send me something (business or personal):
Alex O'Connor
Po Box 1610
OXFORD
OX4 9LL
ENGLAND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![🔴 [TRỰC TIẾP] U20 Thái Lan VS LPBank Ninh Bình | Cúp VTV9 - Bình Điền 2024 | JET STUDIO](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3wRNdAy3DXs/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] VCT Pacific - Playoffs Grand Final // PRX vs GEN](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/G345ud5yRGA/mqdefault.jpg)
As a trans male, i would like to point out that most sane members of the community do agree that placing a trans term in a child is extremely hurtful.
Raise a child as their born gender, allow them open borders within it but don't overly talk or push the discussion with a child.
Nice to hear from a reasonable person on the trans side
@@RedWolfVids it's unintentionagent and harmful can be more harmful n8tbto
@@RedWolfVids Welcome to the concept of the silent majority.
Need more trans people like you, and have your voice heard.
@@stevenwu235 yeah, show me that definition.
You are a genuinely good interviewer. I really like how you push him without being adversarial. I'll be watching more of your videos
It was supposed to a debate not a interview...
@@asdg199 I think it was still a debate. It's just that Alex wasn't disagreeing just for the sake of disagreement. When a solid argument was made or a decent response was given, he was able to accept the claim and move on, even if he didn't necessarily agree.
Douglas did this as well, but to a lesser degree I think but I guess that's the aspect of the conversation that was more of an interview.
I think it's also a given that Douglas was more informed on his position and therefore better able to stick to it than Alex was equipped to counter. So that's likely why it wasn't a back and forth kind of debate but more of a probing of the more certain side kind of debate.
I am flabbergasted. Absolutely love these talks. This level of intellect.
Agreed. Bright guy.
Just starting now. If you're right then I'm totally on board. We need more discussions like the one you described.
This is my first time watching this channel. mainly because of Douglas Murray. I absolutely appreciate the way this discussion unravelled. I wouldn't describe this as an actual debate, definitely not an interview, But a very critical discussion.
Yes, I got her via the same route. Also very impressed by this host.
This is why I love Alex. He always makes the effort to represent the opposite view as charitable as possible. That’s the intellectual honest way, and that’s what’s make the discussion worthwhile.
The thing is there is a difference between the right view and the opposite view. They are light and dark. Truth and absence of truth.
@@ShareAMeal77🎯🎯🎯
I agree, but it frustrates me when he would reframe an argument as it is more likely be advanced by the people who make it, and Douglas would just dodge it and maneuver back to his framing.
Like, when Alex pointed out that “our ancestors had hard lives too” doesn’t defeat the argument for reparations, because the argument is you are benefiting from that legacy NOW, and they are still suffering from that legacy NOW… I would’ve been very interested to hear Douglas response to that, but instead he took it back to “should we transfer money to Jewish people too?”
@@keithmackenzie7680Reparations = Systemic racism
Yes he does, but I think he is too committed to it, especially when the opposite view had evidence bearing upon it. Being open-minded admirable but be careful that your brain doesn’t fall out.
Discussions like this remind me why the mainstream media is so poor and has been for all of my life
Murray features in msm daily. I agree he’s rarely challenged. The interviewer here does well.
David... My sentiments exactly, I don't know your location but here in America, our media is one big ugly dumpster fire. You lose IQ points for every minute wasted watching this trivial gossip click-bait and propaganda utterly useless.
Dems/MSM & our schools are a complete an utter disgrace for the opinions, speculations & outright lies they spew daily (unchallenged) as fact!
I want to hear ALL sides of ant & all issues, then make up my own mind. The MSM & schools in particular, are hurting our youth especially because they (sadly) lack critical thinking skills & they believe whatever nonsense they're taught/told....
@@maria49236 Dems< Oh please you right-wing FOX twat!
When i read something like this all i hear is "my propaganda sources are great and the other sides is horrible". My point of view is that nearly all media is biased and poor these days. Of course I could be taking the comment completely wrong and you hate fox news oan etc just as bad and neglected to call them out equally for the same horrible excuse for journalism.
I spent the entire interview distracted by the wallpaper.
So true !!!!
A neutral background would be better.
I am buying some
it’s like that white dot illusion where you only see the dots when you’re not looking directly at them
😂 It's very loud. It's nice though.
Me too . Mad crazy wallpaper,totally distracting
It is very comforting to read the comments and see some viewers in depth understanding regarding the complexity of both views. Personally i love to watch both intellectuals, and perhaps not always fully understand the complexity of their respective views.
Can't believe Alex failed to ask the most important qustion of all: "Why are you geh?"
That question works both ways.
Because he is physically attracted to men. Duh.
@@shortscenes9338how so?
@@shortscenes9338so does your mum.
Who says I am geh?
35:10 "Historically YOU punched somebody and as a result I'm suffering" No, historically someone with the same innate characteristics as me punched somebody with the same characteristics as you and now you think you are justified in punching me.
I was thinking the same. And looking for a comment like this. And then it would turn around. Giving the decendat of the punched person the right to do the same.
I don't think that's the right way to frame reparations, however. If, for example, people were proposing a "white people tax" which would be used to actively take stuff from white people and give it to black people, with the goal of making white people suffer and lose quality of life, then you might have a point. But that's not what anyone is proposing. Money is already taxed under the status quo, and is taxed from everyone no matter what their skin colour happens to be. Pro-reparations people simply think that some of that money-pot should be dedicated to helping out historically marginalised groups. There's no punching and no vengeance.
@@SuperSupermanX1999 There is absolutely punching and vengeance. A small group of wealthy elites both owned and benefitted from slavery. Yet, those who had nothing to do with it, in particular, the Irish, are forced to pay for the sins they themselves endured. 800 years of British oppression and slavery and now they have to pay for British slavery because they are presently considered white. How absolutely predictable, the elite forcing the plebs to pay the price for their greed and power-mongering while accumulating all the virtue creds to themselves.
@@zeddez1005 Yes, If things were very well documented there could of course be more concrete discussion (even that is a discussion if we should be punished for our ancestors deeds. In what way and in what crimes? Do we issue a special court and system for this? How can we build it to not spiral out of control and divide the citizens even more and thus damage countries future?).
Because if it were well documented who did what, who owned what and how the money transfered. But I doubt this being the case. It will be many dark areas I believe. And what happens to people who fall into this dark area unjustily so? I realldy do have concerns this creates a rift more than we have today in the western world. I think western world needs to become more proud of what they are and a bit more nationalistic. But still owning up to past events. We need to move forward as well. Germany lost two world wars and twice they recovered (no they didnt get to keep all they took. Germany got cut up between the countries who went agaisnt Germany). Japan got bombed twice by the atom bomb and is doing great despite that
I'm surprised how often people gloss over this point. Fundamentally our experience is individual. We can have a look at the hangovers of group oppression but it is not the main form of experience yet people seem very quick to presume a collective "you" and "us" is most appropriate when speaking about experience.
The Irish suffered oppression on multiple fronts, however I did not, and I'm glad my parents didn't try to pass any grievances to me from our family history, I'd consider that stunting and borderline child abuse if they did.
Excellent show! It was refreshing to see an interviewer give Murray some seriously intelligent and good-faith pushback on his views. In most interviews I've seen with him, he's either being lambasted by accusations of (insert)phobia, or is simply talking to someone who already knows they agree with him on practically every issue (ie, Rubin Report).
‘I agree with that’
Excellent interviewing.
Slaves were very expensive only the very wealthy had slaves. Most of us come from families that worked hard and died early just like Douglas said.
"Well Twitter and the real world are different things of course."
Sure wish certain people would learn that this is the case
Unfortunately, certain people lack any properties that would facilitate learning anything of worth.
@fynes leigh It [Well] serves to directly quote Douglas Murray's statement in its totality. Something you may find doesn't happen to often on Twitter. Now Twitter, if you aren't aware, is a "social media utility" quite comparable to a sound bite in form in that it requires all posts or replies to be 280 characters or less. It's a cesspool of vermin all seething in this orgy of outrage and virtue signaling. Lovely place really. If you haven't acquainted yourself with its majesty, I advise you to create an account immediately. You'll come to love yourself and fellow man more fully. This I guarantee to you.
Would a guy with the number of the beast as a profile picture ever lie to a stranger on TH-cam? I dont think so.
@fynes leigh I can't tell if you're being ironic or if you're genuinely confused.
I'm surprised he admitted it, Elliot
Really? Here in the US Twitter feeds are national news and drive public policy creation
Wow. This interviewer is brilliant. I’ve never heard someone debate with Douglas quite this way, I’m a big fan of Doug Murray. I’m a big fan of you both now! Good work.
Totally agree. He presses Murray well. For instance 54:40 Appealing to scientific consensus when convenient, after dismissing the most tested science in the history of mankind?
I agree. However I think Douglas pushes back rather effectively. Jordan Peterson has laid this groundwork much more effectively however; right up from the binary nature of sex up through the accumulation of sex specific psychological characteristics to the sex dependent occupational preferences exhibited in the most egalitarian societies, which is the best that current research has to offer
They’re both master debaters.
Right? He makes me proud to be a Brit. And I'm a Christian black woman
No gotcha questions, no so-what-your-saying, no rage outburst, no 60 min interview conveniently frankensteined into a twitter compliant 20secs sound bite.
Much better that way.
What a perfect demonstration of asking questions longer than answers. 😅😅 great chat!
I came here for Mr Murray, Im subscribing for how cosmic skeptic conducted the interview. Very good!
Same.
He's not always that good, if he's improved. I'll have a look
I have been intently following the two of your careers for awhile now. I love both of your minds and am glad that you are recording your conversations.
Never seen someone push Douglas to pause to answer, or even reword his answers as many times in one interview. Brilliant from both participants.
Its incredible that this kid Is only 20 years old
@@estefaniaboujon6830 nah you can tell he is 20. Educated? yes. Indoctrinated? surely.
@@chrisv384 He is equable and civil during this entire discussion. It seems far more clear that Murray is indoctrinated into believing his own hype, not adequately countering the criticisms levied or unsubstantiated claims.
@@chrisv384 if someone has applied critical thinking and studies various perspectives and still come to a different perspective from you it doesn’t actually mean they are indoctrinated. It is possible they just disagree with you.
Alex is anything but indoctrinated. He questions himself and everyone as a rule, so... yeah, you just disagree with him. Alex is much more brilliant than that boomer. Hes so set in his ways. Its sad
Amazing intelligent talk.
Regarding where "the bad ideas themselves come from":
I think that's rather simple in essence:
Bad ideas make strong (false) identities/ego's AND they are easier to make identities out of.
Where good ideas and true identity is always the harder, narrower path.
Really enjoyable and entertaining as well as educational and a well balanced chat and sound opinions
I’ve just spent 1/2 an hour listening but count how many shapes I can make out of that wallpaper
I too was completely hypnotised by that back drop, I want it in my room now.
It is merkaba...sparkle of life
³³³Cube³³³
I've never seen Douglas Murray unshaven and dressed so casually.
@White Brad Bad damn straight! (I love saying that all a gay man)
I came for the dialogue, but I stayed for the eye candy. :-)
the Jordan Peterson effect.
And suddenly he is like 1000 times more attractive... ... Strange !
I'd smash
Excellent interview. Just wanted to kudos.
Wow. This was a GREAT interview brother. You even made me hold up my own views to scrutiny. This is the type of conversation that is missing in the US.
Probably because a lot of the "intellectual" thought leaders on the right like Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder refuse to engage with qualified people that seriously push back against their ideas and instead "own the libs" by making gotcha youtube videos where they 'debate' non-media trained undergraduate students instead of actual qualified left wing intellectuals that have the debate/media training to call them out for the intellectually dishonest political agitators that they are. But yeah, I agree, US political discourse and their Overton window being so accepting of open white supremacy are a shit show that is socially 20 years behind many more civilized European countries and probably always will be.
America 2 dum
No it’s not…we just got the interweb a few weekends ago, and are watching Jerry Springer…we ain’t hicks, as far as we can figure.
Good thing you’re helping
Scruffy Douglas is my new favorite version of Mr. Murray.
I agree. Scruffy Douglas is beautiful.
Definitely seductive. Cosmic drank some water so early in the interview. He was THIRSTY.
@@FoxyFAsh Actually, to the list of accolades now bestowed upon our beautiful Douglas and his new look, I would add HOT AS FUCK!
@Laurence D I completely disagree. Most (not all) handsome men are even more hot with a beard. And some guys who aren't all that attractive suddenly morph into a hottie because of a beard. I, for one, am so sick of the clean-cut look, so glad that has taken the back seat for a while. I hope the beard trend lasts a good long time. And when I say beard, I mean a nice, well-kept beard, not some ghastly, untamed, frightening rats nest.
@Laurence D dude, you see enemies where there are none.
Would not characterize this as a debate. Interview with Douglas would be a more appropriate title.
Either way, pretty enjoyable.
RWSB1000
Ha, you don't seem to like the idea of him being debated and challenged by someone like CosmicSkeptic
RWSB1000 Indeed! More of a genuine, probing interview. And very well executed
RWSB1000 fuckin SNOWFLAKE
I think he wants to distance himself from Murray's views
@@Scoring57 What a weird statement and curious assumption to make.
I took the OP as that the questions asked and the setup of the interaction wasn't a debate, i.e. antagonistic, but a normal conversation.
How excellent!! Really really wonderfully done. One of my favorite conventions on TH-cam, and it’s years old🥰🥰🥰
I'm late getting here, but Douglas is right about the university system in the US. Since you have to pay regardless of the type of school you attend, and the costs are rising so much, "the college experience" has become a product. Students are able to make incredible demands of the staff and establishments because they're paying so much to be there. It's become an absurd setup.
I went to a community college, which is like the cheapest options you can get in the US, and it was around $7000 for 2 years tuition, not including books. Granted, I had assistance due to my father being in the military so I didn’t have to pay that. However, most of peers still had to take out student loans
@@heatherclark8668 I went to university in the US around that era. It was about $200 per semester. Later, when I went to graduate school, I was paid enough for room and board, as well as tuition (and I worked as a teaching assistant, which was fantastic). As someone else writes below, in effect: 'it cost a zillion dollars, but I was the one person of many who didn't pay that, because I had assistance.' Yep. Can't believe everything you read.
Abzurd indeed 🐸
We have allowed the same corrupt mess to establish itself in Britain - to the direct effect of a dumbing down in both debate, conduct and reasoning. The epistemologically unsound and ignorantly reductive state of many erstwhile cutting edge courses is depressing and deadly to the state of the British research base and dare I say, democratic process. The formally rigorous subjects, the humanities in general are being decimated cut by cut. This begins in the state schools where grammar schools, the cradle of British intellectual life are cutting subjects as diverse and essential as ancient history, music, the classics and drama/theatre studies. The idea for those in charge is to delimit the critical/analytical abilities in most of the population - reserving these skills and praxis for the fee paying students at 'public' school where the aforementioned subjects are not only available but encouraged in order to produce an intellectually trained, if not always intellectually gifted, elite.
1) Uk universities are also very expensive
2) French universities are subsidized by the government and (luckily) radical leftist ideologies are more widespread in my country
This is the first time in a long time that I listen to an interview and am unable to tell which side of any issue the interviewer falls on. In most interviews (especially with controversial characters like Douglas Murray) it becomes very clear in the first 5-7 minutes which side of any debate the interviewer is on, this was really refreshing! I'm black and female and liberal but I'm sick of seeing the politically correct mob try insisting that black people and women be treated like sensitive babies who can't handle critical intellectual engagement with some of our characteristics in a way that it's perfectly accepted for things about "straight white men" to be so interrogated (e.g the hysteria over charles murray and his research). It's annoying to even have to make those qualifications about my "identity", but when I'm expressing these views online I'm often accused of being an angry straight white man just based off my holding them lol. Anyways, subscribed here and on Spotify, keep up the good work :)
Although I am not on the receiving end like you are of this undermining of black people and women I think it is just terrible and can't stand it. it is entirely counter productive to empowering the black women who could actually do with empowerment. What you describe is what Sargon of Akkad refers to as "the bigotry of low expectations'' where assumptions about black people are made as though they are innately more emotionally vulnerable, innately lacking in power, unable as individuals to perform better than white people so white people must have a handicap. we can see this bigotry in the lack of criticism for hip hops views on women where the same people would criticise that culture if white people were involved, we see this with calls to hire black people not for their expertise but for their skin colour which devalues their ability to hold expertise and increases the considerations placed on their skin colour alone, we see this when people make excuses for foreign religious cultures disrespect of women claiming that those cultural element should be respected because they are "others''. this bigotry of low expectation is an exclusion of black people into white social networks as social networks require an understanding of the behaviour that is expected.
The interviewer is not on Murray's side of the issues. If you look at his content he gave a speech about how veganism is a moral imperative which gives you some idea of his politics. He is an astute and engaged listener and questioner which gives him an agreeable affect but he is disagreeing with Murray and trying to pull the other way on every issue. And particularly on the reparations issue they felt very far apart and unable to meet.
@@nozemsagogo868 I agree that alex seems to disagree to some extent. However, the fact that he invited Douglas Murray on his podcast at all is telling. In a lot of instances it almost appeared as if Alex was playing dumb rather than expressing vigorous opposition. Alex is too smart to not comprehend the arguments, which makes it suspicious that he appeared not to in a couple instances. It makes me wonder if he is soft-pedaling to avoid problems.
Haha! Well done, and well said.
that's because often times it truly is white guys pretending to be black just to attempt to lessen the perception of bigotry inherent in their views
Alex, this was honestly the best interview I've seen with Douglas. You two had a certain chemistry and it was obvious that you challenging him was to his great pleasure. It is in conversations like this one that I - as a non-native speaker from Germany - perceive the epitome of Anglo-Saxon, especially English culture of parlance. Our culture has always had a dire lack of such grace and I feel grateful for being able to listen and watching talks like this one. Best from Berlin, Alex
Am English but just wanted to convey my admiration at your eloquence. You write especially well for a non-native and I'm inclined to agree with what you've said sir.
@@johnnysturgis6904 Well, I speak much worse than I write! - but thank you, Sir, very gracious of you!
Our cultrue does not and has never lacked that.
Oh they have chemistry alright... who is the top do you think?
Likewise RP you have a lovely style and I was grateful for the insight you shared about a view of English culture from the perspective of someone from the Continent. Thank you.
This is a great discussion. You have good interview skills, Alex, and I truly enjoy Douglas Murray.
Great content. Thanks for your hard work.
just found your podcast. you play devil's advocate better than anyone else i've ever heard. most people do it half-heartedly or incompletely. thank you for always finding the lever points in the arguments on both sides
Wow! Is this some kind of British approach to interviewing? The interviewer seems to have no agenda, and there is no sensationalism to the questions. His only agenda is to get the interviewee to give clear and detailed answers. I dare say that there has never been an interview like this conducted by a US interviewer!
I’ve never seen as formidable an interlocutor as Douglas Murray so rigorously engaged with . He really had to step up his game with this quick witted young men . Whose clarity of thought and lucidity of expression is impressive way beyond his years .
None of these popular contrarians, like Murray, Harris, Peterson, Shapiro, etc. have ever had their views legitimately challenged. They do everything they can to avoid any real or serious conversations by only talking to under-educated young people or by "debating" with random people on the street who aren't prepared for any type of arguing.
Whitney for real . If they stumble into a fight with a monster intellect , in this age of nano second mass circulation , that’s a carefully cultivated career of narrow rationalist proselytism up in smoke . So they curate ( carefully )
You are blowing so much smoke up his rectum when he’s just a poor mans C Hitchens.
James Gillings ; “a poor man’s C Hitchens” . Hilarious , if he keeps at It . Say about 5 - 10 years voracious reading and unstinting skepticism , I’m sure he will have done a lot more to earn to your respect .
James Gillings how about we test Jordan’s dismissive reading of postmodernism by him being pitted against a a true Rottweiler of the school , not Zizek who , lovely man though he might be is as incoherent as they come . But I’ll definitely check out the Maajid / Murray debate . 👍🏽
around 1:15, Alex asked "how can this have happened so quickly?". I asked myself that about 6 or so years ago and when I read the book "The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self" I found the answer. Brilliant discussion, by the way!
As a Grandmother of 75 with a 30 year old Grandson who is travelling down the LBGTQ+++ road, I found this discussion incredibly informative. I consider myself pretty liberal having participated in women’s & gay rights and anti-apartheid movements during the 60s, 70s and 80s in New Zealand. Now I find myself at odds with my Grandsons rhetoric on this ‘new wave’. I found your points of discussion logical, fascinating and (surprisingly) calming. Thank You.
Perhaps you might agree as I did with Douglas at 16:14 that there was a time when gay people had achieved acceptance and lived quiet lives meeting with people in their own world. I am an old geezer in my 70s and I remember during the 1970s and 1980s there were many clubs etc. where straight and gay rubbed shoulders and that was OK. I cannot comprehend this LGBT++++ view.
It is maybe not your turn to understand it. Maybe you should just accept it. What do you have to lose, except asking for someone's pronouns?
@@4984christianit is problematic! Because those pronouns don't make any sense. Just accept it means just be stupid.
My god! I remember when CosmicSkeptic was cheering on 50k subscribers and now he has Douglas Murray on!
You said it, this is more of a _challenge_ session than a "debate"
I enjoyed the interview, very much so. I had a thought that I feel that I must share. During the debate about reparations and retribution, I could only think of the song by The Tubes called I Was Punk Before You Were.
Great interview! Thanks!
This is one of my favorite interviews anywhere of all time. Brilliantly simple and totally complex. Thanks gentlemen!
I'm a big leftie. Douglas Murray would be a lot more likeable if he did interviews like this more often than the usual right wing nut jobs
@@kratos.8151 How u like ripping Hercules apart?
Whenever I see Douglas's interviews I always feel there's a lack of proper questions that could have been asked. But you asked such important questions and in such a great way.
I totally agree, although I should admit that not only is this the first interview I've seen with Douglas Murray, it's the first I'd heard of him. And though I'm a big fan of Alex, this is the first of his interview segments I've seen. [I'm sorry CS! I'm very busy!] I was worried that CS would perhaps be in over his head, or would go too far in one direction or the other with respect to his interview style - too combative, or agreeable etc. I see I needn't have worried. Well done Alex. I can't say the same for Mr. Murray. If he doesn't understand drag and the use of props being used from the Era of 1st-Wave Feminism, Trans issues, and the differences between them, then he's not in on the joke. [Nobody tell him]. Protests are bad, unless it's the American Civil Rights protests because they were so dignified and didn't inconvenience others? Had he heard of Rosa Parks prior to this interview? Had he never wikied "Selma Bus Boycott? " Black people shouldn't even be considered for reparations because, 'What about the Jews?' and "Where does it stop?" I don't know, Mr. Murray, but I know with whom it does not start. [And when it comes to Jews, that should perhaps be a question for Germany, no? Get your white genociders straight, sir, and good day!] And we shouldn't be devoting a quarter of our minds to the Trans movement? It would appear that you, Mr. Murray are the only one devoting so much to them, and making a few bucks in the process. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Jordan Peterson, minus all that charm!
@@heydannypark cringe
@Daniel C. Harkins Jr. What lol?
Murray is a class act from everything I have seen of him.
He is also a gay man. So he does have up close and personal experience with that issue.
The point he makes about the trans movement hurting gays by erasing them is brilliant and one I have never thought of.
More and more detranstion stories are coming out and they actually share that very same point.
They wish they had just been a gay male..
Brison Bpyce has a TH-cam channel that has alot of interviews with detrans people as well as some interviews of endocrinologist which are really eye opening on the point on what is happening with children.
You are simply wrong.
@@dontworryaboutit5490 wow what a great point, excellent rebuttal
@@briangueringer3673 being gay doesn't absolve him from anti lgbtq bigotry.
Jewish nazis also exist.
Brilliant conversation.
I always find it curious when people are more concerned about the over-reach or arguably sub-optimal solutions that they are about the actual problem itself.
Yes
douglas seems to be saying the kind of racism, transphobia etc claimed by activists doesn't exist. and he's also saying their solutions don't work, rather than that they are sub-optimal
@@gazlives Well, he's wrong on the first point, and if he has better suggestion on the latter, then let's hear it. With these types we rarely do.
@@urbangorilla33 y'all misrepresented him. he said that they do exist, but are not endemic enough to warrant the actions taken and beliefs held of many people who fall under those groups. his solution is to calm down and think historically and facilitate public discourse in a way that can garner wider support instead of blaming and name-calling endlessly. not that I agree with everything he says, but I do like this levelheaded view on things.
@@georget.5048 That may be and I generally do agree with a sober and deliberate approach, and I'm not in favor of name-calling and vilifying. Still, he seems disingenuous to me.
I love how Cosmic Sceptic doesn't deny the guest's reality while still trying to challenge his views in such a polite, honest and good-faith way. Respect!
There is only one reality, so it's not wrong to try to actually deny and challenge someone's views. Understanding that there are different vantage points from which to view reality.
That's because Alex agrees with Douglas, he is just playing Devil's Advocate
Yes! Exactly, I like how Alex will sometimes play devils advocate with his guests
@@GeroG3N what gives you the impression he is playing Devil's Advocate?
I just wish he’d move a step further. He exposed Murray a few times without Murray realising it. It would have been good if he’d let him know.
This is neither here nor there but isn't Murray one handsome man
Can I agree, even though I am a homophobe?
They are both quite handsome 🤷🏻♂️
No
Novak Ingood a man can overpower you and wants to violate your orifices which can hurt badly, this is an attack, how could you not be afraid of gays, that's not too say there's any hatred, just fear
@@sneesus98 wqw
Www
Wow. Brilliant interview
At the risk of focusing on the minutia, I'm in love with the wallpaper.
Goddammit, i'm way too distracted with that wallpaper
DUDE!!!! First time that picture(seen many times) manifested its full brain bending patterned almost musical complexity to my eyes!! Fuck me I almost passed out
Did you recognize that you can build stars with that pattern and a part of the star is also part of the star next to it?
@@Duconi I didn't notice that, but I actually was trying to fold the shapes and the patterns onto themselves in my head, like folding a cardboard box.
You wankers. I wish hadn't read this as now I'm folding stars in to stars in to stars in to fucking more stars
After reading five comments it's official:
This is the realest talk on this entire comment section
I love that Alex finds points to agree on, as well as to challenge. It's great to see that we're not just accelerating away from each other
Great interview. Thanks
Great discussion. One thing that may be an indicator of the severity of a governmental institutional, or personal oppression is the ability to be able to speak about it.
I agree with Douglas Murray. My daughter ask me what is the point of history? I told her the point of history is to learn and remember not to repeat all the bad stuff that has happened in the world.
I’ve never thought retrospective blame is a useful or justified action to punish future generations for something they had no control over.
Remember history don’t escalate it.
There’s far to many people using blame to make themselves feel better. Instead of protest and blame we should have question and solution.
WELL SAID, good sir!!!
Jim Laslett
Psychology, Economics, Political Science, and Philosophy can pickup principles from history to come up with why some event is bad, how some things are prone to setting up that bad event, and if taken seriously, stop the event from repeating. Historians should do their thing, but screw history classes in k-8. I believe K-8, should setup history classes as detective games, where people are given evidence and people come up with arguments on what happened. The rest of the time that would be used for social studies, is used to study simplified concepts in the fields mentioned above.
This is exactly why I believe history is important and too often ignored.
Jim Laslett - Your idea on the purpose of history is far too narrow. History is the warp and weft of the tapestry of life. It provides texture and a background commentary to everything we do. It gives purpose to the past and a direction for the future. Without history, our short lives would be so shallow and two-dimensional.
John Eskins yep there is a lot more to history, I thought I’d keep the reason for history lessons short and positive as thirteen year old kids tend to have a short concentration span. I’m mean you could easily go into DNA, space and evolution the possibilities are endless!
The question from the child was in the context of war
This is one of the best-constructed examinations of Douglas Murray's views I've seen. It's rare to see Douglas be out-manoeuvred but he essentially had to concede the point that people who don't necessarily have the skills to articulate the full breadth of their position are still well entitled to protest about it.
He conceded the point because we live in a democracy, but it has absolutely no utility when inarticulate people have no idea what they are talking about are protesting things that they have no real personal connection to.
@@jaimearviso4642 You either missed the point or have to apply your idea of 'no utility' to Douglas Murray also. He said Extinction Rebellion protesters should be well versed in what they're protesting before they act on it, but was willing to dismiss the gender question on the biology of chromosomes; a science he couldn't demonstrate his own understanding in. It's not democracy that made him cede the point, the interviewer walked him into a position where he could understand and admit that a person doesn't need to fully grasp the science to protest. If he doesn't concede that point, then he can't say the science of chromosomes is 'understood' and that the onus is on others to prove there's more to the conversation than the biology.
And, while personal connection really doesn't have any bearing in my opinion, Douglas Murray doesn't have a personal connection with transvestism, or Extinction Rebellion; beyond blocking his traffic route I guess. So either the point was conceded because it was a good point made honestly, or Murray must also be one of the 'inarticulate people who have no idea what they're talking about and are protesting things that they have no real personal connection with.'
@@rawr70101
1) Yes, I agree. The kids are ignorant.
2) No. The gender thing Douglas is showing how the LEFT has drifted far from science and into madness. It will not serve Alex's generation to go down that road.
3) Douglas is only conceding a theoretical point only. But in no way does he see what is really happening as being useful. If you noticed his tone, he is talking down to Alex as being of a younger generation...like a nephew or grandson.
4) No, he does have a personal connection. He is gay man who admits that the LG and T are not allies in the LGBT movement. It's only gonna muddy the waters and destroy any gains that the 2nd wave feminists have made.
5) NOTE: Douglas Murray is a hypocrite in my opinion because homosexuality is a feeling based thing no different than a person who identifies as the opposite gender. But this is besides the point.
@@jaimearviso4642 Homosexuality is a "feeling based thing" what? You do realise gay people are born that way right?
@@brownie43212 Any rational person would be agnostic on whether homosexuals are born that way, become that way after birth, or some combination on the continuum in between. Scientists have spent a nontrivial amount of time exploring biological correlates to homosexuality to no avail.
Love your Intro/Outro Track! Can I listen to it somewhere in more length?
Really enjoyed that discussion well done
Alex O'Connor, excellent job! What a great interviewer. Kept Douglas on his toes in some parts which is no mean feat!! Great job for both parties. I got sucked in. Very enjoyable
Best interview i've seen in a long, long time.
Incredibly pleasant talk to listen to, kudos!
I'm not sure if it was the conversation or the wallpaper that gave me a headache. I understood everything being discussed well enough, so my theory is its the wallpaper.
Good chat, well thought through devil’s advocate challenges too! Kudos to the host.
I couldn't always tell if your questioning was to push Douglas for detailed answers or whether you genuinely had an opposing view. A good interviewer and an interesting interview!
The purpose is to dig down, play devils advocate.
@@larjkok1184 nope. Alex actually believes these things and the only reason he played friendly is to not embarrass Dougie any further. At one point around 40:30 Alex nervously laughs because Dougie is having trouble even stringing up a sentence. Doug is a pathetic excuse for a person
"I liked it because i didn't have to think about whether i was wrong or not"
@@Jozaaaa Lmao you could play a movie on the side of a skyscraper in 4K ultra HD with projection that powerful
@@Jozaaaa Out of the few hundred comments I read during this interview yours was the most uncharitable, rude, confident and wrong, in a way that only a true ignoramus could muster. Congrats!
This was AMAZING!
Thank you for modeling old-school interviewing and civil dialog. You made people flex intellectual muscles that, sadly, aren’t often exercised in our time.
What a fantastic interview. Thoughtful, calm, and feels very earnest. Very glad to have found the channel. Subbed.
Fantastic interview. I couldn't encourage this type of dialog and conversation enough. It's so refreshing to listen to two people respectfully discuss ideas together.
I sure like it when people are polite to white supremacists! Had we done that in the 1930s, WW2 would never have happened!
Idiot.
That's a lovely quote. "Lies you know are lies are unwise". Words to live by if I heard them.
Alex... you are a brilliant interviwer. Vert well done.
This was a beautiful discussion. More debates should be like this!
Thank you so much for this. This is my introduction to your channel, and I'm so glad I've found it. Subscribed.
Again, such a good conversation to listen to. Feeling grateful 😉☺️.
As for the very important last part on the fixation on identity… As much as the identification with oneself as a person, the doer so to speak, is basically the one thing that obscures the view of human beings, I would say in the case of particular obsessions with identities, such as sex, etnicity, religion, race, gender and ideology, the problem starts when the narcissistic dynamics takes over. As we have seen, anything can become a cult, and decent folks can become sect members on a very large scale, losing common sense, empathy and decency. Yet it is in that order. The existence of genuine transsexuals or people with this or that belief about the divine or about society, does not in and of itself cause a war. Narcissists (or whatever you choose to call them, people with no genuine emotional empathy, people with a different psychological mechanism and a different motivation from that of ordinary doing what we can to get by-folks…) do. We all have a place and a role to play. Just saying that I think most thinking om this misses the mark, not seeing that aspect of what is happening clearly enough…
I'm a big fan of Alex's content, but when they were talking about sex and gender they made zero mention of ANY studies on the matter. It seemed like they start with “we know for sure that there are only two sexes, and no research has shown otherwise" and Alex said he would support further research. The problem with this is that there are plenty of studies on it. Then, at the very least, they should be talking about why they think those aren't valid. There's a video "sex and sensibility" by Forrest Valkai that talks about this topic with a long list of studies at the end of the video.
What a reasonable and well balanced interview. Thb, I don't have particularly strong views on these topics, partly because very little of it affects my life and most of the wide variety of people I know, although I do have my thoughts and mild concerns. Also, I sympathise with certain aspects of both sides but this is part of the problem, how dichotomous and polarising these issues have become. The hysteria and lack of sober fair-minded discussion, on both sides, is concerning. The ideological rigidity reminds me of many fundamentalist and literalist worldviews. Not having the courage for an attack on ones convictions is antithetical to an independent critical thinker.
I watch a lot of political and intellectual things on TH-cam. This was one of the best and most thought provoking conversations I’ve seen in a long time. Awesome content and interviewing here sir.
exceptional interviewer
You haven't seen it much because the TH-cam algorithm doesn't like it.
@@asimhussain8716 Dayum broooo
Usually I stumble across videos and wonder 'How in the world does he have that many subscribers?'
But with you, I can see why so many sub to you. You've really earned it being good at what you do. Well done!
A breath of fresh air - one of the best interviewers around. And thank you for the way Douglas Murray was treated with respect!
Excellent interview. A great example of how people who educate themselves on a subject and can still show respect for one another even with different points of view. A good interview such as this provoke thinking. Very refreshing Thank you.
Dang you're good at interviewing. Really solid job. 10/10 You've gained my subscription.
This is the best conversation I've listened to in a long long time. I loved the level of challenge and how clarity was sought.
Thanks! Very good debate!
"Critical inteview" would be a more appropriate title, however, the video is still amazing
Yeah you're right. There's barely any debate going on, and most of the feedback seems to imply that the interviewer is merely playing the devil's advocate.
It's like it's another one of those faux debates where two pundits from the same side having a talk, and almost nothing is contributed to the discourse; where the goal isn't to make the listeners rethink any preconceived knowledge.
I've been hypnotized by the wallpaper.
Great chat.
I get the 3D cubes, but I'm puzzled by all the diagonal lines...
I've seen so so many people comment on this. I finally have to admit - I didnt even notice it. Now I have to go back and check it out
I'm Irish and at 29:00 when Douglas makes the point that Irish nationalism was greatly harmed by the terrorist tactics of the IRA I had to completely agree. I love my country and it's independence is and was a worthy cause, but precisely for that reason the amount of violence in the last 100 years of my country's history pains me greatly.
The moment it all spirals out of control is 1916 when, in the middle of WW1 when the Home Rule process was put on hiatus, the IRB staged the violent Easter Rising. Most Irish people condemned the violence, but when the British reacted to this as an act of treason and had most of the participants shot, the country erupted in outrage. This culminated in the War of Independence, when just 3 years earlier the country had been working steadily towards a diplomatic peaceful advancement in the cause of self-governance. And the settlement of that war then gave way to senseless Civil War within the newly independent Republic of Ireland. And the outstanding issue of the 6 Northern counties was exacerbated by the threat northern Protestants felt from the IRA across the border in the Republic. Though it is undeniable that Catholics were oppressed in the North by a slim Protestant majority, the prevalence of paramilitary violence against one another and the terroristic bombing of innocent civilians and assassination of politicians was just an unmitigated disgrace and disaster on both sides.
Yet in Ireland today we have a horrible proclivity to declare moments like 1916 to be days of national celebration, as part of the larger heroic mythology of our struggle for independence, even though I see it as the forerunner of the Troubles in legitimising in people's minds that form of violent "political" struggle. Can't get what you want? Just break out the guns lads. People are way too good at excusing bad behaviour when they're the ones benefiting from it.
It's difficult to beat a military regime without guns. Sure, perhaps if Irish people waited long enough then Britain would generously allow them to have their country back. However I think military action was more than justified in 1916. And you can't deny that the 1916 Rising was the inciting moment that directly caused independence. You seem to be portraying Britain as some totally non-violent steward of Ireland, which I think goes beyond charitable into delusional.
@@sayso2135 Well I completely disagree that 1916’s was justified at the time. It is only justifiable in retrospect with reference to nationalist sentiment, because we know “it all worked out it the end”. Had it failed it would’ve been a complete bloody catastrophe that may have even set Irish independence back 100 years. History gives people the delusion that they can apply consequentialist ethics to large events, when this is of course as wrong in the past as it is now, because our ancestors couldn’t see the future any more than we can now.
I did not claim at all that Britain, over the course of its rule of Ireland, was just a “benign steward”. After all, the Great Famine occurred in the same century as the Home Rule movement, and that after Daniel O’Connel had only just achieved political representation for Ireland’s Catholic majority in Parliament. But that doesn’t mean that the peaceful route to independence wasn’t preferable to the chaotic and violent route. The Home Rule movement was making progress, just as Daniel O’Connell had made progress. Britain was civilised enough to permit such progress, which is reason enough not to get violent as anything other than a last resort. 1916 was not a last resort, it was the romantic and overzealous project of men like Pádraig Pearse, who couldn’t wait to be martyred and be the man to turn history’s wheels.
Out of all the Empires on earth at the time, the British Empire was the most humane and civilised, and that’s a fact. Nowadays we think of all Empires as being equally illegitimate, but this is an ahistorical and privileged notion permitted only by our current remarkable circumstances in the free west (and even that is only permitted by American global power, which is just an effort at a global hegemony that is more hands off and humane than even the British empire, which, I get the impression, walked so America could run). Ireland was in a uniquely subjugated position within that vast British polity, but as such had a uniquely long relationship with Britain which has affected our culture profoundly in ways we seem to take for granted. Such as our system of common law, our attitude towards policing, our parliamentarianism, our great tradition of writers (almost all of whom are experts in the English language), our architecture, our manners, our ethics, etc. In my opinion the delusional thing is to deny these things, portray Britain as a brute hunched over our virgin land, justify violence in the past, and then shrink from it in the present when it might actually affect us and our children more obviously.
I contend that you should think about the outbreak of violence in the past as seriously as you would think about it’s outbreak today. My parents and grandparents lived through the Troubles, most of which didn’t directly affect them in the South, yet they still remember it with horror. Stands to reason that people were against 1916 in its day for similar reasons, except it was worse because they’d be right in the thick of it.
Looking back, 1916 set Ireland on a path to war with Britain, a Civil War afterwards, and even the Troubles in Northern Ireland. That alone should make it the object of intense scrutiny. It brought the gun into Irish politics, which was a notoriously difficult to get out. I’m very skeptical about Revolutionary traditions in places like France and Russia, not to mention the various military juntas of Africa and the Middle East, so I’d be a hypocrite not to scrutinise the revolutionary tradition right under my own nose. The Irish are very fond of telling larger nations to take responsibility for their actions. That should cut both ways.
@@patrickkilroy6512West Brit. Go suckle from London's teet. 😂
@@patrickkilroy6512You clearly have been watching too many David Starkey lectures with an unhealthy dollop of self-hating Ruth Dudley Edwards for good measure.
@@patrickkilroy6512 Empires are built on belligerence; they engender violence - it's endemic to their functioning.
The British Empire claimed the sole right to exercise violence in Ireland - others pointedly denied them that right. You can configure an arbitrary moral universe and orientate yourself in relation to others' past expressions of aggression but that's simply you performing your personal pantomime - a fanciful imagining and enactment of an identity you find flattering.
Alex is not remotely adversarial here, but he is making Murray work uncommonly hard for his supper, something one doesn't see too often in those settings you normally find the man. It's not Murray's fault that he tends to thrive when his opponents are clutching at their pearls and it does no good to fasten onto his haughtier tendencies when he is saying a great deal that's worthy of our deeper attention. Alex threads that needle.
I feel this interview really got Douglas thinking. Great to watch!
Wow, I've listened to about four different interviews with Murray, but this one is the best one. Alex asks the correct questions the right way. Tough, tough interviewer without being antagonistic. He's just getting right down to the meat and potatoes.
I love how Douglas Murray can be so inflamatory and lets Say politically incorrect, and at the same time be so collected and calm and remain unapologetic
Such a delightful interview
He's a very traditional Englishman.
Take it from an actual Brit: no he's not. His accent, manners, class and privilege are not typical of your average Englishman's. He's an Eton-educated, pantomime toff who fetishes illiberal right wing populist regimes like Orban's and provides cover for climate deniers (I say this as someone who agrees with him on lots of issues - immigration, the trans stuff, the woke stuff). He is a reactionary masquerading as a conservative, the right wing mirror image of the far-left woke types he despises - just as blinkered, just as prejudiced. @@misanthrophex
@@pn2124 Born in London and went to Eton. He's definitely English
I don't love how he can be so unapologetic. He's voicing opinions, some of them derogatory and harmful, as if they are correct just because they're his.
@@Spiritof_76Don't feed this troll, future people
Very informative interview. Alex, you do an excellent job of engaging Douglas and allowing him to express his points of view- well done. Douglas, clever, witty and thought provoking. Thank you both for sharing your thoughts on the topic!
What a great interviewer , really enjoyed this.
I'm an Indian(in India) and absolutely agree with him on the point of retribution.
It's silly and outrageous that people want Brits to pay to the people of the former colonies for what the former's ancestors did to the latter's!
Most Brits today are not racists! Why do you want to harm them?!
Yet the same people defend Israel!
@@user-dz4ty5tj7q The people who want Britain to pay retributions to India for ¨Muh colonialial oppression" are the same people who defend Israel?
Are you absolutely sure about that?
Britain owes nothing to it's former Colonies many places where shitholes before Britain got there we pulled them up by their Boot Straps in fact they should be Paying us
You clearly do not understand reparations. It is not about asking ordinary Brits to pay or harming them. They aren't living fat off the cow off slave money, genocide money, or ecocide money. There are Fortune 500 companies, huge mega-corporations and aristocratic families whose wealth can be DIRECTLY TRACED to profiting off enslaving and oppressing people and human rights abuses of the worst possible kind. These crimes are not HUNDREDS OF YEARS away. The traumas are one or two generations away. Jews were paid reparations. Indigenous peoples were paid reparations. Falsely incarcerated Japanese Americans were paid reparations. It is not some NOVEL idea. Nor do reparations have to take the form of $$$$$$.
Why should exploited, raped, and abused countries still recovering from colonialism and constant destabilization still have to be paying DEBT to Europe? Just FORGIVE IT. Wipe the slate clean. That is reparations.
Prosecuting and stopping any further ecocide in such countries and mandating fair trade. That is reparations.
Scholarships and opportunities for gifted youth in those countries. That is reparations.
Because Marxists infiltrated our schools and have been twisting the minds of the youth for decades.
Last point, can you do a deep dive history video on housing. How it was, the rules and laws, the tricks and battles, and what it’s like today?
Hysterical…
Shrieking…
Those people…
Fun listening, fun listening.
I've got to hand it to you, your steel man devil's advocacy game is on point. I've seen tons of interviews with Douglas Murray and the rest of the IDW crowd. It's very rare that they seriously grill each other though. You really kept him on his toes. I really wasn't expecting this to be as challenging as it was, not just for Douglas, but for me too.
@53:27 - This bit made me smile. A bit of old skool athiest logic thrown in for good measure.
tbh, I thought some of the questions were kind of petty and a waste of time really. for example, "what is it that makes it a thing that exists within a culture (about racism, sexism etc.) rather than a cultural phenomena?" obviously A LOT! scale/proportion is the obvious answer here.
"if you think that it's false then you have your own proving to do"
Time for Alex to prove that God doesn't exist.
Also, I agree with L M.
Alex presented himself as either ignorant or purposely obtuse. There is no other way around it.
*your
Xxx
I never thought I would see a smart leftist try to have a conversation again with someone on the right and I enjoyed it. The left is currently going throught kind of what the right went through around 2003. Paranoid war mongering, trying to silence opponents because of the insecure opinions they have.
Lomax did he tho...?
This was very good interview. Cogent, intelligent and fair questions. You allowed him adequate time to answer questions with a minimal interruption. Thoroughly enjoyable.
Love Douglas and this is the 2nd podcast I've watched of your's Alex - like your approach, your manner, your interview style. Great one
Man you're getting some serious super guests this is amazing!!
As I've been with Alex since a very early point in this youtube adventure, I am utterly fascinated by (and voraciously curious about) the process of getting high-profile voices such as Murray and Dawkins on his podcast. I smile with pride at his growing success and near-limitless potential going forward.
Degrees from oxford open a lot of doors. Hes actually deserving though, imo. He'll really go far. His ability to self reflect and critique his own views really puts him ahead of all these old reactionary types. According to Murray progressives are always wrong and destructive. Alex clearly sees the value in progressive reforms
If we managed.. if this. But if we but... Douglas is great. @39:40. Thanks!
And also Dinesh went over this, and we went in deep. 👏
“It was like an asylum outbreak!” Had me laughing out loud.
This guy's devil's advocate is more calm, coherent, and we'll structured than people who actually believe in pushing identity politics. Good podcast
What?
@@johnnotrealname8168 the kid basically agreed with him on 90% of what he said...…. TA-DA!
What is identity politics?
@@call4sorrow1 Look this guy (Cosmic Skeptic) has some respect in the Catholic community because he at least was Catholic. However he is unable to understand basic Philosophy which is really infuriating. Also his ethics are @~?£!
@@crap867 Basing Political systems on Identity. It is not all bad but it can lead to people voting to satisfy their ethnic or religious background (which is not always good unless you are Catholic).
Excellent and thought-provoking content.