What Is Horsepower & Why It's A Dumb Unit - America vs Metric

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ค. 2024
  • What is the difference between HP, CV, PS, and kW? Why is horsepower a dumb unit?
    Horsepower vs Torque - A Simple Explanation: • Horsepower vs Torque -...
    Subscribe for new videos every Wednesday! - goo.gl/VZstk7
    Recommended Books & Car Products - amzn.to/2BrekJm
    EE Shirts! - bit.ly/2BHsiuo
    Horsepower is a unit of power created by James Watt in the 1700's. Who knew all these years later we'd still be using a unit he developed to compare steam engines to horsepower. We'll go through Watt's back of the napkin math, discuss in simple terms what horsepower means, and look at metric horsepower as well: PS, CV, and the many other abbreviations. Whether metric or imperial, horsepower as a unit makes no sense at all. We'll wrap up the video learning what unit we should actually be using.
    Related Links:
    Derivation of HP - aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.111...
    HP vs PS vs CV - www.autoweek.com/news/technol...
    Engineering Explained is a participant in the Amazon Influencer Program.
    Don't forget to check out my other pages below!
    Facebook: / engineeringexplained
    Official Website: www.howdoesacarwork.com
    Twitter: / jasonfenske13
    Instagram: / engineeringexplained
    Car Throttle: www.carthrottle.com/user/engi...
    Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/engineeri...
    EE Extra: / @engineeringexplainede...
    NEW VIDEO EVERY WEDNESDAY!
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 4.3K

  • @skyeozga4935
    @skyeozga4935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1970

    Horsepower = horsevelocity * horseforce

    • @alessiocarlevaro6934
      @alessiocarlevaro6934 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Should be Horse (squared) power

    • @nictamer
      @nictamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +175

      Nah, it's horsevoltage × horsecurrent

    • @oldm9228
      @oldm9228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      They will never truly replace horses is all I'm getting from this

    • @pedrobarnez5502
      @pedrobarnez5502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      how does he hold the lightsaber?.....kidding, of course its horseforce!

    • @KieronTaylor
      @KieronTaylor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Horse is a non-SI unit prefix, but I will allow it. HorseAmps, HorseElectronVolts...

  • @jonnybmk6212
    @jonnybmk6212 3 ปีที่แล้ว +634

    "A horse could have more than one horse power." That's poetry, man.

    • @Bdr_777_
      @Bdr_777_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      its true though, search on google "how much horse power does a horse have"

    • @MrClouderhyd
      @MrClouderhyd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      maximum output of a horse is around 15 horsepower,lol

    • @wololo10
      @wololo10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      A horse has around 15 hp

    • @derpymcderpster3447
      @derpymcderpster3447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How much horsepower does a clydesdale have?

    • @vince55sanders
      @vince55sanders 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the steroids worked

  • @FAB1150
    @FAB1150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +373

    Fun fact: "cv" means "cavallo vapore", or quite literally "steam horse"

    • @tzmtzt
      @tzmtzt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      sounds kind of like an item you could find at a restaurant :D

    • @PiscaCPT
      @PiscaCPT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Here in Brazil we say: Cavalo Vapor

    • @usarkarzts4207
      @usarkarzts4207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Caballos Vapor in spanish.

    • @qubex
      @qubex 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very interesting…. I’d always just thought it was CaValli.

    • @Qbe_Root
      @Qbe_Root 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      same in French, the full name is "cheval-vapeur" but we usually just call them "chevaux" ("horses"), abbreviated "ch"

  • @BradGrove
    @BradGrove 2 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    As a 62 yo Australian (and ex-tradesman) I grew up with the old imperial system and then had to learn the metric system after we made the transition after 1970. I remember at first everyone kept converting metric units back to their imperial equivalent so that it made sense and had meaning. Over time you just understood what it all meant. Americans have yet to make that journey but believe me when I tell you that it's not a difficult journey and once you get there you won't look back. The metric system is in fact perfect. We've all moved on from using horses as our main power source so it makes sense to move on to a more logical system of measurement. Did you know that one litre (correctly spelt) of water weighs one kilogram... perfect!

    • @Pincsi01
      @Pincsi01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And liters are basically just a spin of meter cubed in a lower magnitude, but straight convertable

    • @StrsAmbrg
      @StrsAmbrg ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Of course the metric system is the more make sense than the imperial system as the metric units derived after considering all the things. including the using base 10, so we will be easier to scale. 1m=1000m. Compare to 1ft nothing scale to 1mile (1mile=33,375fts). The US is one of a very few countries that are still stubborn to use imperial systems rather than to adopt metric system, which is international standard. Of their stubborn, Space Shuttle Challenger blew up just 73 seconds after launched due to wrong unit conversion.

    • @fizzinsoda
      @fizzinsoda ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nah I don't like how 100km is only 60mph.

    • @kjlovescoffee
      @kjlovescoffee ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@fizzinsoda 62mph, I'll have you know!

    • @jacobrzeszewski6527
      @jacobrzeszewski6527 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nah, we'd just make an American football field based measurement system.

  • @guillermomonroy7319
    @guillermomonroy7319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +509

    A recommendation for the unit of complexity:
    A fenske = how many whiteboards you need to discuss a topic

    • @gabrielschoene5725
      @gabrielschoene5725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      And computer power should be measured in fenske/sec

    • @AaronSchwarz42
      @AaronSchwarz42 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      How many whiteboards per 10 minutes of video explanation ||| whb/kmve : fenske si unit

    • @gabrielschoene5725
      @gabrielschoene5725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AaronSchwarz42 Just barely under one fenske.. but I guess we have to define the size of the whiteboard.. let's say it's a square meter, so one fenske is m² in si

    • @15october91
      @15october91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahah

    • @suttoncoldfield9318
      @suttoncoldfield9318 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      10:02 I kinda have an issue with the word 'nonsense', it's all just physical quantities from the past.
      Nevertheless, I give the video 2.4 kJasons of entertainment,

  • @steven44799
    @steven44799 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2098

    If you were Australian you would get to enjoy cars being rated in kilowatts as well as being upside down.

    • @DaveyGa
      @DaveyGa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Strewth!
      Don't forget about being right hook as well..

    • @jameshaulenbeek5931
      @jameshaulenbeek5931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

      They're not rated in kangaroopower?

    • @benjaminlamptey1867
      @benjaminlamptey1867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      @@jameshaulenbeek5931 that'd be the rating if americans moved to australia

    • @lolish1234
      @lolish1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Aint that mostly true all over the world?

    • @benjaminlamptey1867
      @benjaminlamptey1867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lolish1234 pretty much lol

  • @mobiledev6037
    @mobiledev6037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +898

    Conclusion: American horses are 1.4% stronger than everyone else.

    • @HomeTipsAndTricks
      @HomeTipsAndTricks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      'Merica!

    • @paulchatterton1
      @paulchatterton1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Except James Watt was Scottish, and in the UK we still use imperial HP. You're welcome.

    • @giovannidonega9391
      @giovannidonega9391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@paulchatterton1 Am I wrong or McLaren use metric hp, as in 600lt, 620r, 650s, 675lt, 720s, 765lt....?

    • @janlievaart5131
      @janlievaart5131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Imran A yes

    • @james10739
      @james10739 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Of course our horses do more work than those danty foreign horses

  • @earthsteward9
    @earthsteward9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +302

    Maybe James Watt was just horsing around when he came up with horsepower

    • @travisfrank4706
      @travisfrank4706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What are you doing here?

    • @-Sam69
      @-Sam69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@travisfrank4706 does he need your approval to be anywhere?

    • @travisfrank4706
      @travisfrank4706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@-Sam69 its a Bojack reference. Go be a tough guy somewhere else.

    • @jeremysmith9694
      @jeremysmith9694 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok Dad

    • @-Sam69
      @-Sam69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@travisfrank4706 i think its a copied reference so go take your useless somewhere else

  • @ojask9916
    @ojask9916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +773

    I knew it!, the correct unit should be Llamathrust

  • @davidaprian6965
    @davidaprian6965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +370

    Hey Jason, we need your analysis on the SSC Tuartara's top speed record😂. I know several youtuber already making video about it, but I think you can explain it better..

    • @qba-bomb3959
      @qba-bomb3959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      YES!!! PLEASE!!! This comment needs more thumbs up!!!!

    • @AxxLAfriku
      @AxxLAfriku 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is Donald Trump pretty and I am not? But why does he only have a wife but I have TWO HOT GIRLFRIENDS who I show off in my masterpiece YT videos? Do you know the answer, dear davis

    • @jacksonblanks8038
      @jacksonblanks8038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the car with the given cd, frontal area, and estimated weight is capable of the 330+ top speed. gear ratios say it can too. hell 6th gear in schmee150s video says it can do 293 and over 330 in 7th. so yes the car can on paper do the speed.

    • @NatVirgo
      @NatVirgo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacksonblanks8038 it did 331 mph in real life... on video...

    • @jacksonblanks8038
      @jacksonblanks8038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@NatVirgo the math as in distance/ time is not matching the indicated speed. The car can do 331 but the video has pretty much been proven that it wasn't the actual run.

  • @bluceree7312
    @bluceree7312 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    This is the most popular and thoroughly researched community college class I ever got into.

  • @camerons2763
    @camerons2763 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    the "watt if" joke definitely just earned you my subscription lol

    • @salerio61
      @salerio61 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How about the "thank you for Watt-ching" at the end

    • @maldohh7451
      @maldohh7451 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hehehe

  • @ifindkeinschlauename
    @ifindkeinschlauename 3 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    In Switzerland, actually I think in all of Europe the power of a car is most of the time mentioned in kW and PS (hp).

    • @navrasicsi
      @navrasicsi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yes, I can confirm this. According my experiences (in Hungary and Germany at least) when average people talk about cars, they prefer HP/PS to kW.

    • @milospolansky1505
      @milospolansky1505 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      In Czechia we care more about kW.

    • @hikingjoe4752
      @hikingjoe4752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@navrasicsi When talking about cars no one ever mentions kw here in Germany. Everyone talks about PS.

    • @hititwithit
      @hititwithit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Officially, here in The Netherlands the power of a car is measured in kW, but PS (PK for "paardenkracht", or "horse power" in Dutch) is mostly used by regular folks.

    • @Ultranium1
      @Ultranium1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In Russia, in car papers both kilowatts and horsepower are used in conjunction, but people mostly use only HP.

  • @SpartanFore
    @SpartanFore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +340

    >laughs in australian
    >remembers I'm not australian
    >proceeds to brag about my car making 61,500 duckpower

    • @mohitme1234
      @mohitme1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      How many kangaroos did u pay for it. ?

    • @USUG0
      @USUG0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      fun fact, I watched an Australian car channel video where the journalist gave his height in foot! Don't know if he was an imported Oz though. But, as we are all colonies we have to bow to the Imperialistic nonsense.

    • @sjb2471
      @sjb2471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@USUG0 for some reason, the height of a person is the only vestige of imperial still regularly used in Australia (some elderly people will occasionally use feet/foot for distance though) , but anyone younger than gen x is less and less likely to. When it’s used, it’s almost always used alongside the centimetre measurement of height too though.

    • @RobbieFitzgerald
      @RobbieFitzgerald 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sjb2471 Most people in Canada still use ft/in for height and lbs for weight as well. It's only commercial or places like a doc office where you see kg and M, in general.

    • @teslafarts6402
      @teslafarts6402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Horse power academy is a great Aussie/New Zealand TH-cam channel. Hilarious joke btw.

  • @tim83h
    @tim83h 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    As an Australian, it’s so satisfying watching this video 😂

    • @michaelspina3554
      @michaelspina3554 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As a fellow Australian, I couldn't agree more 🤣

    • @Hogberg-
      @Hogberg- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂.
      In sweden we still use "hästkraft" which is directly translated from horse power.
      I am trying to get used to kW in cars but it is difficult 😁.

    • @zackenslin
      @zackenslin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yep, same here in South Africa. The metric system makes so much sense (for measuring a lot of other stuff also: e.g. distance, volume, etc.)!

  • @TheOneWhoMightBe
    @TheOneWhoMightBe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    "A horse could have more than one horsepower."
    Clydesdale: hello.

    • @stevensullivan5287
      @stevensullivan5287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or a Belgian..... have friend with 2 of them, awesome.

    • @Kevin-dt9xm
      @Kevin-dt9xm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the average horse is actually capable of 15 horsepower, i saw a theory one time that Watt came up with the number by seeing a pony put out about half a horsepower and he was like "well a horse is about double that size so it probably has double the output right"

    • @radboxingedits4107
      @radboxingedits4107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m pretty sure the average horse has 25 horsepower

    • @TimpBizkit
      @TimpBizkit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kevin-dt9xm well if a horse weighs 1100 lbs, it could only plod up an incline at 6 vertical inches a second if it had 1 horsepower. It's an "all day" output for a draft horse.

  • @Sithhy
    @Sithhy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Should've said "Thank you for watt-ching" at the end

    • @aterack833
      @aterack833 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Maybe he did and you just didn’t catch it?

    • @Torza-14
      @Torza-14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh boe...

  • @thenfactor
    @thenfactor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    Everytime you mention horsepower on your videos just mention the watt equivalent with it. You have a large audience and it would start putting it in people's heads. I know I would appreciate it.
    Be the change you want to see 🙂

    • @posteroonie
      @posteroonie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Along those lines, why don't we put up speed limit signs in kph in addition to mph? Oh...

    • @gabrielschoene5725
      @gabrielschoene5725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@posteroonie can see the headline: engineer charged with thousand of counts of mansualughter after replacing all speedlimit signs with metric

    • @jackprice6599
      @jackprice6599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gabrielschoene5725 Everyone's already trying to do 100 on the highway.

  • @Kavi4GP
    @Kavi4GP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    S.I Units, its scalable in a easy to understand manner. 1000mm , 100cm , 1m etc...even in slow Africa we work on that.

  • @papajimg9238
    @papajimg9238 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great video!! In fact, KW is the official unit used by car manufacturers and is also used to calculate vehicle taxation

  • @BeefIngot
    @BeefIngot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +366

    I wonder how many manufacturers stick with horsepower purely because it gets higher numbers

    • @XenFPV
      @XenFPV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Probably all of them. I know when I'm watching Mighty Car Mods and they talk about 250kW I'm less subconsciously impressed than I would be if it was 335 bhp.

    • @reedhoward27
      @reedhoward27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      @@XenFPV All you have to do is think "Holy cow! that's a 250 _thousand_ watt engine!"

    • @BeefIngot
      @BeefIngot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@reedhoward27 If only it was that easy, women would think "Holy cow! thats about half a foot!"

    • @julianneale6128
      @julianneale6128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Well McLaren being a British car company strangely use metric HP, not British HP. But having said that they say their engines develop a certain power, but in reality they develop much more, which is even more confusing...

    • @alexwhite176
      @alexwhite176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It's because people aren't smart enough to convert to killowatt also it's what people are used to and understand. Car market is smart. They know most people don't care to learn. New things and stick with what ppl already know. Most people are sheep 🐑. It's sad.

  • @jamesf456
    @jamesf456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    I'm counting 7 colors on the whiteboard and I see a few horses drawn as well. This must be serious!

    • @xkimopye
      @xkimopye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The horse and car drawings were about the only things I could understand.

    • @frogz
      @frogz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      there is 8 colors, 9 if you count white!

    • @beetleything1864
      @beetleything1864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When he cracks the whiteboard out you better pull your chair up and pin back your ears. Jason is about to drop major info on you.

    • @thomasbrogan8036
      @thomasbrogan8036 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So true; this is an eight- color explanation.

    • @BMWM3GTS92
      @BMWM3GTS92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You know it's something serious when there's 7 colours and I see a few horses drawn on the whiteboard.

  • @danieledwards1081
    @danieledwards1081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    We've been using Kw in Australia for years. About time you lot catch up 😉🤣

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      US carmakers give power specs in both HP and kW. Take your pick.

    • @eugene9852
      @eugene9852 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think the UK is more confused. It's like they started introducing metric and got bored and gave up.

    • @danieledwards1081
      @danieledwards1081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Richard Wood that's because the Watt is the unit of measure... kilo is just representing a thousand of them

    • @danieledwards1081
      @danieledwards1081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@eugene9852 the UK is definitely confused... they have British Standard Whitworth sizing too, who the hell understands that?

    • @danieledwards1081
      @danieledwards1081 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Richard Wood fair call, you are correct in your statement there, I was just a bit lazy in the way I had written it 🤣 👍

  • @adarsh.mimani
    @adarsh.mimani 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    11:50
    "A horse could have more horsepower"
    that's legit funny🤣🤣

  • @DanielJaegerFilms
    @DanielJaegerFilms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +599

    Interestingly, a lot of heavy duty industrial diesel engines used in marine or generator applications have their power measured in kilowatts. I never really understood why until now. It just makes more sense!

    • @liamcollister
      @liamcollister 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      MW is where it's at in those industries!

    • @beniaminrolea8891
      @beniaminrolea8891 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      In EU cars have the power specs also in KW

    • @DanMar5858
      @DanMar5858 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      There is also a formula to calculate the kW rating back to HP, which is kind of ironic but we use it all the time to track our Gensets & make sure the engine actually matches the electrical output. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @sijankhan7796
      @sijankhan7796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Jason neglected to mention one more issue with using hp - that is, there are at least a dozen definitions of horsepower depending on the industry of application. So to avoid confusion it’s better to rate everything in terms of watts

    • @atarvhegde5210
      @atarvhegde5210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Am I the only one who feels Engineering Explained should confirm if the SSC Tuara( I don't really know the spelling properly) , can actually reach 315 mph?

  • @polakjan
    @polakjan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Here in Czechia usually when people talk about cars they would use HP, but all official documents and stuff like that uses kW.

    • @tbsquire7838
      @tbsquire7838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tady si aspon muzes vybrat co pouzijes no

    • @vojtik1234
      @vojtik1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cože? Neznám nikoho na západě Čech, kdo by používal HP. A na netu to taky nikdo nepoužívá.

    • @jakubzidek
      @jakubzidek 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vojtik1234 Taky neznám nikoho kdo by používal hp. Všichni přepočítávaj na kW.

    • @TheSummoner
      @TheSummoner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Likewise in Italy.

    • @overdriven77
      @overdriven77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same in Bosnia and Herzegovina (and I'm pretty sure, rest of former Yugososlavia).

  • @sKnsean
    @sKnsean 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    SI Units so simple :)
    Love when you include both units when explaining stuff.

  • @thecompanioncube4211
    @thecompanioncube4211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The best thing about kW is that it's easily transferrable to the electric cars as W/kW/MW are used so often in electrical contexts

  • @marcoconci7867
    @marcoconci7867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    In Italian "CV" (cavalli vapore), literally means "steam horses", I think derived by the idea of steam machines.

    • @migteleco
      @migteleco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      In Spain, we use CV. as well, representing "Caballos de vapor" (Horses of steam, or steam horses, as you said), and people in everyday life usually talks simply of "caballos" (horses) of a car. Very similar to Italy, I would say. :D

    • @felipenicolau7091
      @felipenicolau7091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Same thing in Brazil, we say "Cavalos a Vapor (CV)", in portuguese. And indeed there is this slightly difference with US horsepower.

    • @SD-tj5dh
      @SD-tj5dh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I thought France used CV too as the Citroën 2CV literally stood for '2 cheveux vapeur'

    • @kornaros96
      @kornaros96 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SD-tj5dh that's the taxable power at the time of introduction

    • @Totone56
      @Totone56 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SD-tj5dh Yep, that's right, as far as i know CV means Cheval Vapeur. Everybody says "XXX chevaux" though

  • @BarneyDesmond
    @BarneyDesmond 3 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Clearly we need to talk about lightbulbs in horsepower as well. An average domestic fluoro tube here is rated at about 20 millihorsepower!

    • @XDbored1
      @XDbored1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      you cannot use millihorsepower! as a measurement that's a unholy mixture of logic units and freedom units

    • @BarneyDesmond
      @BarneyDesmond 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@XDbored1 would it be okay if they're metric horsepower? Wouldn't be so horrible haha

    • @XDbored1
      @XDbored1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@BarneyDesmond that could work it would be miliPS not as fun as millihorsepower! though

    • @bhuuthesecond
      @bhuuthesecond 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This should be the top comment

    • @dbmail545
      @dbmail545 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reeeeeeee!

  • @BradGrove
    @BradGrove 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Was looking at the new Kia EV6 review (American market) and noticed that the fuel economy stats on one of the dash displays was presented in Miles/kWh. This is a perfect example of how ridiculous the measurement systems are in the U.S. As an Australian, to see imperial and metric units on the same display is just incredible, and not in a good way.

    • @mereobserver1727
      @mereobserver1727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, we could always try the good old miles per gallon… of electrolyte ;)

  • @edgarvarela1835
    @edgarvarela1835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This TH-cam channel has helped me a lot in my mechanical engineering clases omg I love u

  • @jasoonpittard9900
    @jasoonpittard9900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    Sounds like you really want to use kW instead of horsepower.
    I completely agree

    • @phillee2814
      @phillee2814 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The EU (and I suppose I should now be clarifying "and the UK") do use Kw alongside the more traditional variants of horsepower. If you look at the specs of any newer vehicle, they give both. Torque is also correctly specified in N/M, sometimes with (KgF/M) alongside for the poor dears who don't understand the difference between weight and mass.
      If Ft/lbs are still specified on anything it is in a footnote or (for a torque wrench or other measuring instrument) on a separate scale.

    • @DeFausti
      @DeFausti 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@phillee2814 Yep and laws etc. are based on the KW units like A2 bikes for example (max 35KW), but most people still use HP sadly

    • @glorious_help
      @glorious_help 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DeFausti people relax...... 1hp is 0.75KW.. ... or 1KW is 1.33hp, how hard is for you to convert.

    • @DeFausti
      @DeFausti 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@glorious_help Where did I complain?

    • @mrzee4862
      @mrzee4862 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@phillee2814 I think Australia and New Zealand use kW for cars.

  • @lilman227
    @lilman227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    The McLaren exhaust looks like Horse hooves now, and I can’t unsee that.
    Edit: here’s a time stamp 1:11

    • @philipmalaby8172
      @philipmalaby8172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I thought the same thing!

    • @lilman227
      @lilman227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Philip Malaby So glad someone else gets to suffer from this realization!

    • @ekw555
      @ekw555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I saw it too.

    • @SimplyP0w
      @SimplyP0w 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Adds two horsepower

    • @bernhardkreindl4379
      @bernhardkreindl4379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly!

  • @davidellis1079
    @davidellis1079 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video! In the UK the motoring press tend to use brake horse power (BHP) which differs significantly from both SAE horsepower and PS. This is at odds with the car industry, which uses PS and sometimes also kW in its publications.

  • @garylee6359
    @garylee6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explanation ! You managed to turn confusion into clarity. You are exceptionally good at this.

  • @henrywyhyt
    @henrywyhyt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    "A horse can have more than one horse power" that really did it for me 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @FSXgta
      @FSXgta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@DashCamSerbia and 15 for short duration

    • @danieljensen2626
      @danieljensen2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@DashCamSerbia Yeah, actually peak output of a horse is about 15 HP, 1HP is supposed to be more of an average of what a horse can do all day.

    • @Gibson99
      @Gibson99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are we talking Shetland pony power or clydesdale power?

    • @Martink9191
      @Martink9191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      even one person has more power than 1HP

    • @culture-jamming-rhizome
      @culture-jamming-rhizome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DashCamSerbia I did some reading and it looks like Ullrich, armstrong, ect.. can push over 450 watts so that is over 0.6HP

  • @BOB-uz5mq
    @BOB-uz5mq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +210

    I like your horse drawings. 🤣

    • @rednammoc
      @rednammoc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      NGL, this boy is unfairly blessed with artistic talent!

    • @darnellquesnel1832
      @darnellquesnel1832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@rednammoc but he's way smarter than most of us.

    • @DaveyGa
      @DaveyGa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wanna see the horse cutaway..

    • @etmoem
      @etmoem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      horse in high heels

    • @dcfgarage
      @dcfgarage 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kinda looks like a mouse... just saying. 1 horsepower equals 15 micepower

  • @soaringvulture
    @soaringvulture ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn. What a great teacher you are, Jason. Both illuminating and entertaining. Keep being magnificent.

  • @nesigannaidu2432
    @nesigannaidu2432 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Final someone and hopefully many others that share this view,
    Awesome video... in South Africa 🇿🇦 we adopted the full metric system of measurement...

  • @ma77mc
    @ma77mc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    As an Australian, I have only ever known Kilowatts, it makes so much more sense.

    • @brunohill3229
      @brunohill3229 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As a post 1970 Australian

    • @ma77mc
      @ma77mc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brunohill3229 yep, 1980s here.

    • @robina.jensen6114
      @robina.jensen6114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's only makes sense, if you grow up with it.
      In Denmark we use metric HP (In danish: HK) and that make more sense to me, as i'm really do not care about the energy level the KW contains but HP is telling me how powerfull the engine is. But now many manufactores inform about the power in KW and i no longer understand how much power does the engine produce. I can look at the specs and thinking: Oh is twice as powerfull as my microwave...!

    • @Liggliluff
      @Liggliluff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@robina.jensen6114 That's only because you know the magnitude HP has, but you can just as well learn the magnitude watt has. You'll eventually get it.

    • @omnihein9322
      @omnihein9322 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@robina.jensen6114 ... You're literally defending the American usage of the Imperial system with that logic...

  • @trentmoore6596
    @trentmoore6596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    As an Australian who grew up on KW. it so funny how you make it seem like its something new it cracked me up. hopefully it catches on over there.

    • @9psi
      @9psi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And automatically multiply Bhp by 0.746 to get there if not stated

    • @stinger15au
      @stinger15au 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @J B did you not watch the video. Within 10 years everyone would be on the same page, worldwide, kw (like the rest of the metric system) just make more sense.

    • @stephenhill1680
      @stephenhill1680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here mate. Just use kilowatts here. The Yanks can have their Horsepower.

    • @AlexandreMS71
      @AlexandreMS71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And torque in Nm

  • @paulcamalin5236
    @paulcamalin5236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your teaching has a lot of horsepower. Thank you for your research and conveying that to us!

  • @svendsen1111
    @svendsen1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Engineering Explained - at the very end: “Thank you so much for WATTching” ... i see what you did there! Informative video that makes me learn, as always. Hope you are well. Cheers from Denmark

  • @MrDowntemp0
    @MrDowntemp0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    By watching Mighty Car Mods, I've become familiar with the kilowatt, and that Australians use it instead of HP for their internal combustion engines.

    • @codyhill6238
      @codyhill6238 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      We use it for everything, as its a unit of power. Our cars, our generators, our hairdryers, our light bulbs, our electric motors. Thats the nice thing about using the real unit of power, its applicable to anything that uses/makes power.

    • @promethbastard
      @promethbastard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Killerwasps

    • @maximilon927
      @maximilon927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So do most european countries, but hp are maintained for old consumers to relate to

    • @bugsygoo
      @bugsygoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Proof that Straya is better than Murica.

    • @xkimopye
      @xkimopye 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just assumed England and USA were the only ones using horsepower. And that their horsepowers were different to each other. Doesn’t the rest of the world use kw?

  • @trichtertus6221
    @trichtertus6221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    A little addition: I think you wouldn’t talk about kgf in metric. One would refer to it as 1kgf = 9.81Newton

    • @_-_ttt_-_
      @_-_ttt_-_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True bro. 1kgf we used in idk maybe 1970-1980? Lol

  • @mcr717
    @mcr717 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man you are great. Thanks for all your excellent explanations

  • @lesliethilow3011
    @lesliethilow3011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was a fantastic explanation, thank you so much!

  • @AntonioBarba_TheKaneB
    @AntonioBarba_TheKaneB 3 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    in Italy CV means Cavallo Vapore, or Steam Horse. That's a nasty type of horse!

    • @lfox02
      @lfox02 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Same in Spanish, Caballos de Vapor.

    • @kimbaleon27
      @kimbaleon27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      So is that refering to a steam punk breed horse or how much steam burning a horse will generate?

    • @AntonioBarba_TheKaneB
      @AntonioBarba_TheKaneB 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      both are plausible explanations I guess :D

    • @lfox02
      @lfox02 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kimbaleon27 😂

    • @frankthechemist
      @frankthechemist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Same in french : Chevaux Vapeur

  • @ThexXxXxOLOxXxXx
    @ThexXxXxOLOxXxXx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Horsepower shows the 19th century gentleman the power of these new so called combustion motors and what they can carry compared to a typical horse!

    • @matthewmcclain1316
      @matthewmcclain1316 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's definitely why it stuck. At the time they had nothing to compare to.

  • @TryAdaptLearn
    @TryAdaptLearn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    With more Evs and hybrids Kw could be a good option. Hopefully additional marketing will include torque and vehicle weight as as much as they market hp and mpg. All four values would help to combine the ideas of efficiency and performance as a means to the same goals, like you have with many of your videos.

  • @rm5608
    @rm5608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do a great job explaining things well spoken

  • @parimalkakde7714
    @parimalkakde7714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    Everyone's waiting for your video on the SSC Tuatara mess 😂

    • @romirsarangi4341
      @romirsarangi4341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah man

    • @bbsheppo
      @bbsheppo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Definitely

    • @henrycollins2478
      @henrycollins2478 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed

    • @parimalkakde7714
      @parimalkakde7714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@mi76ke you clearly don't know Jason

    • @loickl
      @loickl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mi76ke He answered bellow in some comment about the SSC videos and Shmee's :)

  • @hondacota4rt
    @hondacota4rt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    "kilogram force" made my metric heart ache :(

    • @DrsharpRothstein
      @DrsharpRothstein 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sad that he messed up by doing that. How many screw-ups have been caused by bundling mass with gravity?

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      “Kilogram-force” is the force on a one-kilogram mass under standard gravity of 9.8 m/(s squared). It is is a useful term, as is “pound-mass.”

    • @jerzy8722
      @jerzy8722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@DrsharpRothstein Well, i checked this thing with kilogramme at the end of this video ((kg*m^2)/(s^3)) and surprisingly it isn't wrong. You can convert it into normal equation using (F=m*a) => (m=F/a), so (kg=N/(m/s^2)) => (kg=(N*s^2)/m), then you can see that you can change this: ((kg*m^2)/(s^3)), into this: ((N*m)/s), which is (J/s) which is Watt.
      EDIT: English is hard...

    • @markmuir7338
      @markmuir7338 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Yeah - it gave me a bit of heartburn. Now the sick has cleared from my mouth, I can point out that kgf was a thing in the early metric system before the SI system was standardized (now when people say metric they mean SI). SI tries to minimize the number of units and removes conceptual flaws like this.

    • @danieljensen2626
      @danieljensen2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is metric, just not SI. 🤷‍♂️

  • @chocosash
    @chocosash 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am learning English from your videos. Thank you for using nice, clear, professional language!

  • @SmotusGaming
    @SmotusGaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    6:32 He uses Paul Walker's car from Fast and Furios 1 as model

    • @bruh5924
      @bruh5924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      its called eclipse and its not paul walkers and no one cares

  • @FengXingFengXing
    @FengXingFengXing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    Force units is newton (N), work/energy unit is Joule (J = N•m), watt (W) = N•m/s = J/s. Work should use ∫F•ds vector equation.

    • @ndrsg3013
      @ndrsg3013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      dydx of fx

    • @sbelllido
      @sbelllido 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Exactly!! Force is in Newtons, distance in meters and time in seconds.
      The kilogram is only for mass.
      Also, the torque is commonly expressed in N.m

    • @axelBr1
      @axelBr1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @Humberto Villegas Yeah, I don't think there is such a thing as kg f (kilogram force). That is what the Newton is. But I guess it's a convenient way to go from lbf without introducing more complexity. But it does indicate why SI system is much better than English Units, no need for random conversion numbers.

    • @axelBr1
      @axelBr1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Humberto Villegas The lb is a unit of mass, there is no such thing as a lb-mass. A lb-force is a weight of 1 lb experiencing the force of gravity 32...ft/s2. Wikipedia states that "A slug is defined as the mass that is accelerated by 1 ft/s2 when a force of one pound (lbf) is exerted on it."

    • @axelBr1
      @axelBr1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Humberto Villegas I grew up in England in the 1970s and 1980s and we had switched to metric by then, which as a chemical engineer I really appreciate. It's insane to do any kind of engineering in Imperial Units. But at work, I still think of pipe diameters in inches, and still think of beer and milk in pints, car fuel efficiency in miles (UK) per gallon, (even though petrol pumps have used litres for decades), buying fruit and veggies by the lb etc.

  • @HeatedFilms
    @HeatedFilms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    We've been using kW to describe engine power for quite a while in Australia.

    • @chrismannik
      @chrismannik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We also use kW in most European countries. I'm from Estonia and we never talk about horsepower here, only kW.

    • @danieljensen2626
      @danieljensen2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's mostly just the US and UK that use horsepower.

    • @lorenzlammerhuber2661
      @lorenzlammerhuber2661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      In german speaking countries we also use hp most of the time, if it's not for engineering purposes

    • @derfurz8618
      @derfurz8618 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@lorenzlammerhuber2661 Kw is always listed but nobody really uses it

    • @sebastianb3135
      @sebastianb3135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chrismannik In Poland we officially use kW but in everyday life we mostly talk about HP

  • @Malak-dx4pj
    @Malak-dx4pj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just read about Horsepower in my science book it's some thing easy to understand and thank you so much for ur great explain.

  • @JazzbLu
    @JazzbLu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was an over explained answer to a simple question. I love it!

  • @hueyiroquois3839
    @hueyiroquois3839 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    A few decades ago, in a noisy factory, someone asked me, "What's the metric unit for horsepower?" I thought about it a moment and answered, "Watts." He responded, "Watts the metric unit for horsepower?" I said, "Yeah," and he looked at me funny and walked away.

    • @stevewilson6524
      @stevewilson6524 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Abott and Costello would be proud! Who's on first? Watts a horsepower?

  • @infinite1der
    @infinite1der 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I was expecting a tie-in to your previous video regarding HP as a function of torque ( T x RPM / 5252 ), or at least converted radians. You know how much your audience loves MATH, MATH, and more MATH!

    • @gabrielschoene5725
      @gabrielschoene5725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      180lbs*12ft= 2160ft lbs*2.5/5252= 1.028179741hp.. that's before watt rounded

  • @vhjioa
    @vhjioa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hahah EE, this was a true engineering video, and as a fellow engineer I did laugh at "watt if" 🤣. Awesome video, and it reminded me what the units for W actually were rather than the more familiar Joules per second. Highly appreciated to make people aware of and a good watch! P.s. I still use HP for cars 😋

  • @maxcarter3413
    @maxcarter3413 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for a perfect presentation.

  • @JJSmith1100
    @JJSmith1100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    In South Africa everything was changed to metric in the 1960"s. I can honestly say that I never even new there was a metric HP and you will get a very blank stare from most people if you in the old measurements. For me even worst than the HP is the difference between US and Imperial Gallon.

    • @GertvandenBerg
      @GertvandenBerg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      With metric being watts / kilowatts...

  • @gyes99
    @gyes99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    What is kgf?
    The unit of force in SI is Newton (N = kg*m/s^2).

    • @ASJC27
      @ASJC27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      kgf is a common metric unit, just not SI. I use it all the time in my job as an aerospace engineer, but I do convert to N for calculations.

    • @wuokawuoka
      @wuokawuoka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he meant kg * g = 9,81kgm/s^2

  • @IamGroot786
    @IamGroot786 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This guy's videos are just outstanding!

  • @NishadAbdulkhader
    @NishadAbdulkhader 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great and smacky explanation...hats off

  • @benhockley
    @benhockley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Had someone try to convince me EVs should be rating in horsepower because having the motors in kW and the batteries in kWh was too confusing...

    • @spawnof200
      @spawnof200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you know a mechanical watt and an electrical watt arent the same thing right?

    • @__beer__
      @__beer__ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣

    • @felipenicolau7091
      @felipenicolau7091 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @luffygrful
      @luffygrful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@spawnof200 yes but actually no

  • @timberthane
    @timberthane 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    An acre is an area of one furlong(220 yds) by one chain (22 yds). A furlong was how long the fields were because fields were plowed by oxen and they needed to rest so they made the fields that long because thats how long the ox could plow before a rest. then they turned around and went back the other way. One chain wide was how much one man with one ox could plow in one day. One acre.
    Also there are eight furlong in one mile. If you're good at math you'll see there are 640 acres in a square mile. This was all established by the Anglo-Saxons a long time ago. There's just something romantic about the old ways of measuring and if it ain't broke, why fix it?

    • @greentjmtl
      @greentjmtl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quick, what's the area of a rectangle that is 11'5 5/16" by 25' 8 7/32"?

    • @tylermeade81
      @tylermeade81 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@greentjmtl 37’ 1 17/32”; but then again, the only issue I have with Metric is that it is Decimal, neither Dozenal nor Hexadecimal.
      EDIT ; completely botched the actual operation!
      276’ 5 301/512” is the best I could get off the top of my head, if we’re going for precision (and even if that is technically correct, it’s not recorded correctly. I’m not a machinist so I’m not familiar with thous)
      279’ 2 7/32” is the best I could get going for accuracy in a, for lack of a better term, scientific sense.
      286’ in a realistic situation.
      293.02777’ is the best calculated answer I could get to this question.
      Out of curiosity, I tried to convert the problem from Imperial to Metric by rounding the fractions and reducing to inches (just to check against the accuracy of these answers), but the result I got was so radically different from the other three answers that I’m unsure of the actual answer: 272231.7136 cm or 8931.667 sq ft.
      My math skills aren’t particularly great to begin with, and they’re very rusty. I know this is more like missing the forest for the trees to your comment, but I wanted the practice.

    • @dinky9216
      @dinky9216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Following your reasoning we should use oxen to plough fields.

    • @timberthane
      @timberthane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@greentjmtl in my 56 years I’ve never had to solve such a problem other then at school.

    • @timberthane
      @timberthane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dinky9216 don’t be silly.

  • @raymondanderson1026
    @raymondanderson1026 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative. And I loved the rant at the end. 😂

  • @CrimsonRegalia
    @CrimsonRegalia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When you actually have to do complex calculations, the simplicity of derived Metric units like *"Watt"* definitely simplifies things a great deal. You never have to memorize anything and you can usually get by with logical analysis.

    • @soaringvulture
      @soaringvulture ปีที่แล้ว

      I have found that I still have to memorize stuff.

  • @HumbleMechanic
    @HumbleMechanic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +460

    My miata thanks you! Also I see an engine cutaway and I smash like!! Also also metric!!!!!!!

    • @tylerbickford565
      @tylerbickford565 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm glad my 2 favorite car youtuber are such great friends

    • @Nipplator99999999999
      @Nipplator99999999999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I started to watch him originally because I'm just a nerd, but keep watching to practice metric conversion. I really am a nerd...
      Besides I love metric, my Impala's power stated as 857554.852 watts, sounds so much more impressive than 1150 hp. Well, "had" is what I should say, it's hard to always keep a horse herd that large following suggested driving inputs. Instead of, for sake of arguments, not ripping out a rear spring mount, before gleefully driving into a power pole and 6 trees.

    • @TheFranpito
      @TheFranpito 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Nipplator99999999999 your impala has 857kw then...

    • @markmiguel7508
      @markmiguel7508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I watched this video to see whether or not you'd make a "Watt" pun. You did not disappoint 😄 also, great explanation on power. Thanks for another top-quality video

    • @Nipplator99999999999
      @Nipplator99999999999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheFranpito you miss the point, I can't break HP down to 85k dog power. A full load of BS is spread out by two bored guys over their cars. Popping open dump cut-outs (ran 6 silencer mufflers normally to savior blues& wes purging NO2, and a nice big number, like 857554.852 watts isn't familiar to a lot of people, all give somebody a lot of distractions right before staging.

  • @planktonofbikinibottom
    @planktonofbikinibottom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    " *Watt* if there was a unit that equalled 1kg•(m^2)/(s^3)?"
    I loved that bit 👍😂

    • @ralanham76
      @ralanham76 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Super simple as 123 ... 1^2/3

  • @bengarcia2074
    @bengarcia2074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No worries bro! It is not meaningless, education and learning is never meaningless. Your doing great and I love the videos! 😄

  • @JohnLeBlancCan
    @JohnLeBlancCan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks! Best explanation I’ve found so far on TH-cam and a great review of high school physics. 100% agree that watts are more sensible than HP. My Tesla tells me how many Watt-hours/km it’s consuming. BUT, Tesla still advertises performance of their new cars in HP! People (and countries) are very attached to their units and I think it’s going to be a long time before we see measurements in horsepower disappear.

  • @Taliyon
    @Taliyon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I kind of knew all of this, just through observation in life. But it was really nice to see it all shown in a structured format. Fantastic video!

  • @DapperHesher
    @DapperHesher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I approve of this. Make The Watt Great Again.

  • @sureshbabu-tj8fl
    @sureshbabu-tj8fl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent information... Thanks!

  • @Ahmed-kr2vx
    @Ahmed-kr2vx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos have rekindled my interest in engineering and physics

  • @nmsrocha
    @nmsrocha 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    There's a lot of confusion regarding kW vs kWh ( power vs storage )

    • @HeatedFilms
      @HeatedFilms 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yep, he should do a video clearing the misconceptions about kW and kWh.

    • @gregcollins3404
      @gregcollins3404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Power vs energy. The energy capacity of storage batteries is measured in kWh, the rate at which the energy is transferred is power.

    • @procerator
      @procerator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Its pretty easy, really.
      100kWh - means you can power 100kW motor for an hour. (assuming 100% COP)

    • @MaximKilligan
      @MaximKilligan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      kwh is a silly unit. Joule is what you are after.

    • @procerator
      @procerator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@MaximKilligan yeah, the top trim Tesla S would have 360 Megajoule battery. Sounds cool :)

  • @mantazzz28
    @mantazzz28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Majority of Europe (also other countries, such as Australia) use kW as a standard. For example, power is written in kW in car documents, if someone talks about car power, they say it in kW and so on.

    • @andreaurru4990
      @andreaurru4990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not really the case in Italy, some documents are written in kW but when you're talking about car power nobody ever uses kW

    • @ryadhasanahmed5443
      @ryadhasanahmed5443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andreaurru4990 that's true, I've never encountered anyone in Europe who uses kW to measure power output of a car

    • @Ultrazaubererger
      @Ultrazaubererger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My experience in germany is that official numbers are usually stating both PS and KW.
      But people still talk about PS because thats what advertised and what the media uses.

    • @mantazzz28
      @mantazzz28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I live in Lithuania where everyone use kW, so I thought that it is standard in EU. Well, you live and you learn.

    • @cbrest
      @cbrest 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it kind of shifted in time? I remember in the 90s horsepower was more used, but then kilowatts appeared in car documents, etc. And now my brain is completely wired to dealing in kilowatts. I have to use the Google unit convertor if car TH-camrs talk in horsepower :) And it's really that much easier. You use W or kW for every other kind of power (heating, lighting, you name it). Oh, and I cried and puked at the same time, when he used kgf instead of Newtons.

  • @Jer_Schmidt
    @Jer_Schmidt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +539

    Aw yes, my electric car can accept a 335.26 horsepower charge rate into its 99.24 horsepower-hour battery pack. The U.S. is weird...

    • @THESLlCK
      @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      nobody uses it like that come off it you nerd

    • @KoudZ
      @KoudZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@THESLlCK comon, wouldnt it be nice? :)

    • @THESLlCK
      @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@KoudZ no

    • @sking2173
      @sking2173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s about to get weirder ...

    • @lithobreak3812
      @lithobreak3812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      @@THESLlCK that's the problem. the us has hundreds of different measurements because each one is for a different purpose when one of each would do. Why have different unit for electric power and mechanical power when one would do for both.

  • @alexkuzmin9268
    @alexkuzmin9268 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. There are already a number of countries that use kW to measure power and hp to kW has a nice conversion factor of 0.75.

  • @sebastianye5531
    @sebastianye5531 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    3:28 who knew a screeching sound from the marker could be so physically painful

    • @flippert0
      @flippert0 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We know this since 'Jaws'

    • @AurumFaber
      @AurumFaber 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes my ears hurt

  • @ethan9552
    @ethan9552 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks so much for WATTching. It helps out a ton

  • @mojoneko8303
    @mojoneko8303 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I would like to see you do a video on the difference between "Continuous Shaft Horsepower" used for diesel engines and "Peak Horsepower" used for automotive engines. Thanks for all the interesting videos!

  • @mohamadshahriman6950
    @mohamadshahriman6950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Malaysia, we use PS (HP).Thank you for the explanation.

  • @loickl
    @loickl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I feel better now, Jason explaining something that i am actually able to understand + mentioning FRENCH and metrics in the same video. I am now in peace.

    • @julianneale6128
      @julianneale6128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes but what's more alarming is that he kept referring to HP as American, when it's British!

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@julianneale6128 Even after talking about James Watt...

    • @julianneale6128
      @julianneale6128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jupiter__001_ exactly!

    • @evilkillerwhale7078
      @evilkillerwhale7078 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Y'all just not watch the video or what? American hp and British hp aren't the same, lol

    • @Jupiter__001_
      @Jupiter__001_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@evilkillerwhale7078 No, British bhp and American hp are the same. McClaren is a weird company and uses the German hp (PS) to inflate their numbers. 600PS looks more impressive than 590bhp, so they use the continental units. Britain uses Imperial for all its measurements of power.

  • @gameboyterrorysta6307
    @gameboyterrorysta6307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Me studying engineering and hearing about "kilogram force" for the first time in my life. Why not use Newton, unit of force? Kg*m/s^2.

    • @xopelvi2796
      @xopelvi2796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Because this channel is aimed at laymen (see "Engineering Explained" as name) who are not familiar with what a Newton is.

    • @KentRodgman
      @KentRodgman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      to be fair, I do think the logic of the argument he's making here makes more sense instead of introducing more units. I think he could have mentioned what a Newton was and still broke it down the same way, but keeping everything at absolute base units makes sense too.

    • @gameboyterrorysta6307
      @gameboyterrorysta6307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@KentRodgman Newton is base unit. It is 1kg*1m/1s^2. Kilogram force is 1kg*9,81m/s^2. [N] is used to measure force in every country that uses metric units. Nobody, I repeat, NOBODY is using kilogram force.

    • @KentRodgman
      @KentRodgman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@gameboyterrorysta6307 yeah but in the video he does multiply by g to get his referred kilogram force, he is in no way saying it's 1 to 1, he has kg*g in his formula.. I know that nobody uses it this way, my point is if he's trying to paint a trail for someone to follow that is totally new to this, it makes some sense to keep everything in base units. A base unit is the unit which is measured against a standard, and cannot be broken down into other things. While we refer to Newton in force for convenience, it's base units are kg, m and s. This is just a method he's chosen to illustrate a point and follow a logic path, in no way is he saying we should be using kilogram force as a standard measurement, that is a Newton.

    • @mikeblatzheim2797
      @mikeblatzheim2797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@xopelvi2796
      This might be me not knowing how education outside Germany works, but not familiar with Newton? It's a basic unit that students get familiar with in their first year of physics, and everyone over the age of 12 will have learnt it.

  • @fridaycaliforniaa236
    @fridaycaliforniaa236 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In France we make distinction between « Ch » and « Cv » : « Ch » is for the real power of the engine, while « Cv » is for administration (papers, insurance, legal things).

  • @jacquestaulard3088
    @jacquestaulard3088 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic explanation!

  • @lachlanparker570
    @lachlanparker570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm Australian (sort of), and I only use horsepower myself due to familiarity. But thanks to you, I finally understand it all, and I shall change my designs accordingly...

  • @julianneale6128
    @julianneale6128 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At 09:15. It's British or even Scottish HP, not American. James Watt was British, from Scotland.

    • @TheCcponyboy
      @TheCcponyboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watt inventor of the improved steam cycle.... Scottish..

  • @RemekMM
    @RemekMM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You for the video.Its great.

  • @williamcheung8189
    @williamcheung8189 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful and logical presentation of reasoning. I salute you and thank you! Metric system are awesome!

  • @Nipplator99999999999
    @Nipplator99999999999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I grew up around a lot of those grind mills, and that force to move it sounds about right for 12' 2 story stone disk grind mills.

  • @tkhcheng
    @tkhcheng 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    @11:00 Jason: "A thousand kilograms metre squared over second cubed. These units make a tonne of sense."
    I see what you did here. LoL

    • @hlfan
      @hlfan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn't know that sense is a unit of area per time😏

    • @tkhcheng
      @tkhcheng 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hlfan ^per time cubed...

    • @hlfan
      @hlfan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tkhcheng yeah missed that...

  • @TravisTellsTruths
    @TravisTellsTruths 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and I agree but since it is now a standardized measure, it doesn't really matter where it came from so much.

  • @supermecha6675
    @supermecha6675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are strong in your data that you have about cars .thanks