Alhamdulillah. We are forever grateful for our ancestors for accepting Islam. It is because of them we are Muslim today. We can't thank them enough in this life. Being a Muslim is an honour. Lots of good wishes from Kashmir.
@Ali Ajmeri You have a point, yes, but many bhakts were considered Sufis too, including Guru Nanak etc. The bhakti movement was very intertwined with Sufi traditions.
@Ali Ajmeri Guru Nanak was seen as a Sufi in many shrines and there was no "Sikhism" in his time. That developed later on. Know your timeline atleast. There's even a story of a dispute between muslims and Hindus as to bury his body or burn it because they both considered him to be from their faith. Your knowledge lacks too much basic history.
Thank you for this upload. Amongst all the videos that we see online on Kashmir, this one really does justice to the region - unbiased, unprovocative, you have not taken sides, which most other commentators do. You have only presented the facts as they may have happened,and, I must say, I didn't know half or more of it till I watched this video. So, thank you.
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
I am so happy that one of my favourite TH-camr has made a video about Kashmir. I am a Kashmiri. It was so good to know about our History. I wish this stuff was thaught in schools. Thank you so much bro!!
Not bad! Here's some additional context that I think the viewers might be interested in: * The etymology of Kashmir is likely traced to the Hindu saint Kashyapa. * Kashmiris are known to have worshipped the sun god Surya, with many temples still standing in the region to prove as a testament to this * Rinchan's first choice was to convert to Hinduism, but was rejected by a popular priest due to his Tibetan ancestry. It's a tantalising what if.
Wrong.. Kashyapa is a mythological character. Truth being not one scientifically valid study has been made till date to assess the ancestry of Kashmiris. However, the physical characteristics clearly are more akin to middle eastern races
@@taby9756 u r a very ignorant person. Anything nd everything which doesn't suits ur mindset nd propaganda is a myth.... o waoo 😂 Ur nd anyone's Religious biases can not cover the truth .
@@infinity-hr3qi first go and read that entire story shrouded in myths from the get go. Just one more attempt to try and potray kashmir as a hindu domain. We Kashmiris know where our ancestors came from. I bet ur ignorant little mind would not even have heard names of those places or civilizations.
@@taby9756 Oh....come on , if Rishi Kashyap is a mythical character then, so is Mohammad.....as there are no scientific evidences that he existed.... There are just literary references to him similar to the ancient records of literary evidence mentioning Rishi Kashyap in Vedas as one of the Saptarishis.... And mind u if the stories of Rishi Kashyap are myths .....then, so are stories regarding Mohammad which are also exaggerated as hell.... So, how can u be so sure that Mohammad existed, if Kashyap did not?? And do not doubt the historicity of the ancient Vedic records.....historians and analysts have certainly traced it about 3500 years ago.....
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
I like how you specify "pakistan invaded Kashmir and Hari Singh signed the accession with India" instead of so called unbiased documentaries who avoid it all together and just say "pakistan and India started fighting over kashmir"
Then the Real Question is who is actually Kashmiri? Demographic change due to forced conversion,Genocide,Exodus gives the title of Kashmiri to the present so called Kashmiri people? It’s part of Indian culture since millenniums
The video literally said kashmir was an isolated region for most part of the millennium. Also there is no such thing as called "indian culture". Sub-continent culture is a collection of a large number of local cultures which did influence one another but at the same time can be easily differentiated from one another. There was no one India or Indian culture. It's always has been collection of different kingdoms and large number of local cultures. Regarding the indigenous kashmir, all of them are real kashmir as majority of them had converted to Islam. Them converting to a different religion doesn't make less of a kashmiri.
The Kashmir was never Ethincally changed. Sure Conversions happened and some people left. But before Kashmir was Hindu it was quite Buddhist. But the Leftover Population was also Kashmiris. Subcontinent is made sub local cultures of different people. That's why you have so many different Languages. Hindus are not an ethinic Monolith. Local people changing there religion doesn't mean they are not indigenous to the land anymore.Kashmiri are the only left Kashmiri.
Definately it was originally was a non isalmic , polytheist state ...They were force converted into islaam reason being they had no option either they would die or accepted islaam ..
@@luckysharma4593 actually according to rajtarangni our kashmiri buddist ancestors were prosecuted by indian hindus but if we look at islam in kashmir, most of kashmiris choose islam by their choice. Be it richina or shahmir or chaks.
I love the animated maps with the clouds! Somewhat random question, but do you like the song "Kashmir" by Led Zeppelin? There's a live version of it on TH-cam with an Egyptian orchestra.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT this is not a Persian land , it is hindu land and important hindu sites have been destroyed and for many centuries, the rituals have not been performed due to destruction of temples. Will have to reclaim the land and start the rituals.
even if you involve kashmiri pandits living outside of kashmir today , Mulsims in kashmir still make the 95% population . and secondly , i hope you don't compare 360 kashmiri pandits that died to over thousands of Kashmiri Muslims dying for decades ??
@@dutchvanderlinde9488 no why should I compare the dead I just told the reality, I think you have something to do with the comparison over their religious backgrounds
@@divyankpandey3431 If you think I was comparing them I understood you wrong . I do not belittle kashmiri pandits and their struggle . But i came from the position , where I have seen plenty of Indians belittling Kashmiri Muslims and their sufferings with a tag line of “ what about Kashmiri pandits “ .
@@dutchvanderlinde9488 how can you be so sure that only 360 people died? Many have died. And the Muslims in Kashmir have been dominant forces. They haven't been massacred until poonch massacre and in turn the Jammu massacre happened and of course the ten massacres of Shias by mughals... Take care brother..
@@IBrainedMyDamage yes Alhamdulillh I am Somali Muslim and we are proud to be Muslim. We Somalis people Became Muslim at the time of prophet Muhammad PBUH and the six century. We love our religion Islam.
2:21 what is the base or source to say that it has been rebalion at that time Kashmir was flourishing like none other, sharda peeth was one of the most prosperous university with great scholars, the level of education and scripture on tantra and shaivism is still astonishing
Re mulla ka channel hai kyu serious le rhe ho,hai to kuch nhi asia me banaya bhi kuch nhi wo apne subscribers ko khwab dikha rha hai apna bata kar hath se jo chala jayega
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
No it's just Pakistan is wrong and India is wrong and Kashmiris are still not independent like they want that doesn't mean they're not proud to be Muslim they have so much love for Islam
@@sarthaksingh501 india is oppressing them talk to a kashmiri all them if they like how India treats them and ask them if they want to be a part of India
@@aosel-gharably1070 Legally that land belongs to India and no one is opressing them, if you unecessarily pick arms against army, what do you except the army to do, they too have families.
How were the Kashimiris ruling themselves when all the rulers were Turks/Persians/Afghans?? Such a weird slave mindset where people start idolizing their oppressors. It happens to such an extent that people start hating their own culture and history. You tried to sound objective but couldn't help leave your bias with the last comment.
@NigerianBroda your name is nigerianbroda and you claim to know more about India than Indians?, Caste system has very less influence in modern day India, on the contrary people from "lower" caste are given many benefits in educational institutions and government jobs, just talking pure BS out here because someone differs from your biased point of view, stop following the herd mentality and try to understand actual reality.
Lol did you see the video? Where he mentioned Turks, Etc ruling Kashmiris? Yes, Kashmiris lost their sovereignty to Mughals, who we never accepted. But before that Kashmir existed as an independent sovereign state ruled by Kashmiris of different origins.
10:37 till that time forcefully the ethnicity of Kashmir has been changed, the Sharda peeth, the temples had been destroyed by true Islam. Pathetic | biased
Kashyapamir ( after Maharishi Kashyap) is kashmir and Kingdom of Raja Jambolochan is Jammu... beautiful piece of land created by God on earth's surface...it's also land of Nandarishis...mystic Bharat🙏
7:25 wish you can learn about hinduism first before using devi Lalleshwari to use for putting your ideology, that how earlier hinduism was bad and how Sufism is great and admired order, the land of Martand sun temple, the land of kashyapa, the outstanding sharda path existed and people were proud of their heritage, Lalledhwari was preacher of nirgun bhakti which is very much Hindu and not similar to Islam. biased
as a kashmiri hindu, well I have to say she indeed mixed concepts of sufism and nirgun bhakti and bridged the gap between hindus and muslims. pls try to understand islam flourished in kashmir due to sufism,and it promoted communal harmony. Lal Ded actually influenced many hindus,especially lower castes to get converted to islam because it was simple and free from priesthood. Even many muslim mystics derived inspirations of their preachings from shaivism so it was intermixed.
A small correction to your video is necessary, otherwise, it is a great video: Afghanistan through its official non-recognition of the Durand Line, also claims a portion of Kashmir. Personally, I find that the claim lacks merit, but it is technically a claim.
@@blacksheep6174 You might be right. I've seen a map of the claim that doesn't include it as well as some that claim a piece of it. The Afghan government fails to make the claim clear.
@@sfnzmi They cannot Claim bcoz Afghan Govt is Allied To India and 40% of Kashmir is Under indian occupation Whole Valley and Ladakh and Kpk Balochistan was Annexed by british frm afghan emirate but Kashmir went into Sikhs hands even before british and there was no agreement for kashmir like in bw emirate nd british .
Al Muqaddimah; You lack basics of Indian history - sadly its not uncommon at all. Its not "Umaad caliphate" (as you pronounce it at 1:54) but 'Ummayyad Caliphate' - in English. I will leave pronunciation mistakes made in this video at this - I was expecting a Muslim to pronounce at least such well-known phrases/words accurately. You also mention (2:08) existence of "Islamic emirates", another example exhibiting lack of cursory understanding of Indian history. To claim these monarchies or in some cases feudatories to be "Islamic emirates" is akin to claiming modern-day France being a Christian state - just because France is culturally Christian and holds onto liberalism which rose from Christianity. Sadly, I see a total lack of understanding even of the gist of Indian history. Shockingly you also claim, "Islam finally broke into India on the back of Mahmud of Ghazni's horse." (2:20) Firstly, this is blatant and gross misrepresentation of Indian history especially the history of Islam in "India". Unfortunately, many Pakistanis are taught this farce. Even the most unread person in India at least knows that Islam flourished in southern-"India" (Malabar coastal regions) way before Muhammad ibn Qasim, thanks to the Arab merchants and settlers! Ironically, even Islamophobes don't dispute this. Secondly, there was no "India" back then (this is a fact which most modern Indians themselves don't understand). The so-called Indian subcontinent has for the most of the time, till the arrival of Central-Asian rulers, been made of different and divided mandalas, kingdoms, monarchies, feudatories, headed by different leaders, kings, rulers or chiefs - except for the Buddhist ruler Ashok who conquered most of these and covered almost entire 'Indian subcontinent'. For instance, before the arrival of Muhammad ibn Qasim, territories of Sindh were ruled by Raja Dahir - a Hindu - whilst the majority of the population was Buddhist. Before Raja Dahir, the "Rai-dynasty" (Buddhist) ruled over the territories of Sindh. All in all, to claim that advent of Islam in India coincides with Mahmud Ghaznawi entering India and, even hinting at the idea of an existence of "India" are both ridiculous and far away from objective and factual history. The concept of a "state" is a modern one and unknown to ancient people of the land referred to as the "Indian subcontinent". Apart from this there are several historical and other inaccuracies in your videos, one example is of 'Jizyah', it isn't "a head-tax on non-Muslims" as you claim. Jizyah is to be paid by the able-bodied young non-Muslim men who weren't a part of the army (of the kingdom) defending the kingdom. Females, children, mendicants, the destitute, old and, those able-bodied non-Muslim men in the kingdom's army didn't have to pay Jizyah. Muslims paid Zakah to the king and his treasury, which was higher than Jizyah and was applicable on males, females, old and young (15 or above) irrespective of the fact whether or not the men were a part of the army of the kingdom or not - until and unless they were destitute (below nisaab). Thus, if Jizyah is a "tax", so is "Zakah" which was always higher than Jizyah and was applicable on all Muslims. I suggest that you do deep-researches instead of cursory ones to understand the real history of what is today called the Indian subcontinent.
@Mario Fonseca; I don't know which part of India you come from but apparently you don't know much about India - I assume you are an Indian. Because most Indians are ignorant of their own history and religion(s) so much so that they have been brainwashed to equate myth with history - I don't expect much from Pakistanis either. To help you understand what I said in my previous comment, the so-called "Indian subcontinent" region was never one state (which are a modern phenomenon) with one name in ancient times. Ashok and Aurangzeb were two monarchs who conquered (or gain allegiance of) almost the entire Indian subcontinent. If you read the most ancient Hindu texts, the name of the region where Hindus resided was called 'Aryavarta' (in other texts its also called as Bharat-varsha). For example, Manu-smriti the most important and famous dharma-shastra (texts on Hindu jurisprudence, legislation et cetera) states that, "आ समुद्रात् तु वै पूर्वादा समुद्राच्च पश्चिमात् । तयोरेवान्तरं गिर्योरार्यावर्तं विदुर्बुधाः ॥ २२ ॥ ā samudrāt tu vai pūrvādā samudrācca paścimāt | tayorevāntaraṃ giryorāryāvartaṃ vidurbudhāḥ || 22 || The country extending as far as the Eastern Ocean and as far as the Western Ocean, and lying between the same two mountains,-the learned know as ‘Āryāvarta.’ (22)." [1] To explain this shloka (verse) I quote the famous commentator of Manu-smriti, Medhatithi, who notes, "The particle ‘āṅ’ (in ‘āsamudrāt’) indicates the outer not the inner boundary, and it does not indicate inclusion. Hence the islands in the oceans do not come under ‘Āryāvarta.’ What are mentioned here are the four boundaries of the country: the Eastern Ocean on the east, the Western Ocean on the west, the Hiṁālaya on the north and the Vindhya on the south. In as much as these two mountains have been mentioned as ‘boundaries,’ they are not included under ‘Āryāvarta’; from this people might be led to conclude that one should not inhabit these mountains. And with a view to (avoiding) this possibility, the Author adds the next verse.-(22)" [2] All in all, most Hindu-texts demarcate Bharat-varsha or Aryavarta to be the land-mass between "the Hiṁālaya on the north and the Vindhya on the south" and the two seas-oceans on both sides. So, if we take this definition, current day India is much larger than Arya-varta or Bharat-varsha of the olden times. Interestingly, most Indian states/territories (Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andaman and Nicobar, Lakshwadeep and huge part of Odisha) which are beyond the Vindhya ranges was never considered to be a part of Arya-varta in ancient times, rather were called ‘mlecchadeśa’, 'andhra' et cetera. Mlecchas - a derogatory epithet - were non-Hindus just like Hindu-scholars have been calling Muslims 'mlecchas' since the advent of Islam in India. You can say that modern-day India is made-up of Aryavarta, mlecchadesh, andhra et cetera. If I were to reply to you in your language "India is a rump state that has been Sankrit-ising, Hindi-ising and Hindu-ising its diverse population." How hard is it to understand that in ancient times there was no concept of 'state' rather there were mandalas, feudatories, kingdoms that made-up the region politically, this region is called the "Indian subcontinent" today. Others (foreigners) called a part of this region (the Indian subcontinent), specifically speaking the Indus valley, as Hindush, Indika, Indos, Sindh (Hind) and from this came modern names like Hindustan, India et cetera which are today applied to an entire country. I hope this gives you a bit of more clarity - please feel free to ask me if you are still in doubt. Indians seriously need an education - they should be reading real history and not myths and lies propagated by the Hindu-revivalists, Hindutva-vadis, dharma-gurus, Pandits and pathetic politicians. _________________ [1] MANUSMṚTI: With the ‘Manubhāṣya’ of Medhātithi, trans. Ganganath Jha (Reprint; Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1999), vol. 3, pp.235- 236. [2] Ibid, 236.
@@blacksheep6174 modern state did exist after 1947, but it's shape was already defined since antiquity. the British only locked that Border by end of 19th century and later carved it to please both Jinnah and Nehru. well, especially Jinnah.
India donate Kashmir by Pakistani hand but one reason that is Pakistan must take Indian 20 crore Muslim. If kashmiri Muslim do not live in India why Muslim live other state in India.
@@mkfarooqdotcom jab India Pakistan ka taksim hua tha tab kaun sa Pakistan aur Bangladesh mein hinduon se poochha tha Kashmir mein maharaja Hari Singh ne to accession kiya tha India ke sath. Hinduon ko kya Mila .Musalman ko 3 state Mila Pakistan Bangladesh or secular India. Aur Hindu log Pakistan Bangladesh se apna Ghar chhodkar Refugee ki tarah India mein rahata hai. Aapko kaise maloom hoga refugee hona Kitna taklif hota hai.
As a kashmiri ,I had no idea about the things you mentioned in the video. As we are currently under occupation we are not taught kashmiri history in schools.I would really appreciate it if you would be able to make more videos like this in future. Edit:Thank you for the unbiased telling of the history.
@@paramitabanerjee7495 Right now Indian occupation and by chance if they get independence Pakistan will quickly slide in to take control either directly or by installing a puppet government. Kashmir needs a strong military and good relation with neighboring countries to truly get independence.
By the way, speaking as a person of mixed Hindu-Sikh India origin, I must say your channel is remarkably fair when handling delicate issues Just one request, as a new subscriber, how can I find out what books/journals/sources you use? The channel is very informative but while quoting historical information I like to have something to refer to besides a youtube channel (Albeit one of high quality). ?
@@iqbalhasadhd The Kashmiri Pandits were native to that region, we have seen enough of what happened to them. If Pakistanis can help one sect of Kashmiri then we can surely help the other. Anyway, Pakistan is slowly imploding so I assume your kind will soon be up shizz creek without a paddle, especially given the Modi government is present in India.
Shah Mir was indeed from the Tajik Swati ruling family of Swat (a kingdom that encompassed tge old Gandhara area and was a Ghurid - Delhi Sultanate vassal). They were indigenous Tajik Dehqans of the Gandhara and Badakhshan region. They were also called "Gabri" indicating their original Zoroastrian background. After the Yusufzai Afghans invaded Swat with the assistance of Babur the Mughal in 1520, the Swatis were overthrown and displaced. They now call themselves Pathans and speak both Pashto and Hindko. They originally spoke Gabri (Zoroastrian Dari). They patronised and facilitated the prominent Muslim mystic of Kashmir, a Persian by the name of Shah-i- Hamadan. I myself am a Swati. Shah Mir himself was a Swati adventurer from Batkhela town in today's Malakand Division of KP in Pakistan. He supposedly went to Kashmir after his father saw a dream in which he saw his son as king of Kashmir. The Shahmiri Tajik rule was finally put paid to by Akbar, Babur's grandson, although they still figure prominently in Kashmiri society.
Shahmiris were Kashmirized and spoke Kashmiri. Because his ancestors were living in Kashmir for centuries. And Shahmiri Kingdom was called the Kashmiri Kingdom by themselves as well as modern historians. Their descendants live in Kashmir and are proud Kashmiris.
There is no pure ancestry in the world. They may have tajik ancestry but they were Kashmiris. Even before being tajik, they were something else. Shahmiri's were Kashmiris.
@Al Muqaddimah I'm from Kashmir and I wanted to read al Muqaddimah of Ibn al-Khaldoon. Is there a prerequisite I should go through or can I jump straight into the book? I also wanted to know the English version I should prefer.
I live in India and always support Kashmir as part of India but after 70 yrs of abrogation of temporary art370 but not art371 and no referendum promised 70 yrs back i see my viewpoint changing
@@duncanbrown3448 I want return of Pandits in Kashmir, but what about northeast why there is still 371 and if you want to end temporary articles so perform the promised referendum which will decide final fate.
@@furqanshariff if you believe in the two nation theory then get the fuck out of this country, the basis of india's claim to kashmir is completely legal as both the monarch of the dogra dynasty as well as the most popular Democratic leader of that time agreed that kashmir should be in India if diverse countries like India or Pakistan were to conduct referendums that easily both of the countries would collapse into a mess of dozens of states fighting for each other's territory
@@furqanshariff you are a Muslim and you don't support India. It is a known fact. You bow down to Mecca and follow Arabic culture. You belong to Arabs not Indian. So pack your bag and go to your country or if you don't want to go then you and your family has to be Indianized.
He mentions how the Kashmiri Pandits arrived on the scene, and that the likes of Aurangzeb liked to visit Kashmir... but doesn't mention that the emperor had a campaign to kill or convert the Kashmiri Pandits! A pretty large omission it seems.
@@mkfarooqdotcom the same way how Zoarasthian majority Persia was invaded by Arabs and forcefully converted into a Muslim majority present day Iran. The world's first imperialist way before Europe were the Arabs who propagated their culture and language in the name of religion
FYI: Nowadays these same makhdoomi etc consider themselves as pure blood of noble islamic lineage and doesn’t marry outside their family. Basically Kashmiri Muslims in general have not left their hindu ideologies at all.
Thanks 🙏 I admire your honest report about my motherland. Kashmiris don't report like this about their land like you have given facts about the history.
many people who have read history of kashmir would say the word "kashmir" comes from the word "khas" as it was used to address kashmiri people before mughal invaded it. and a point people of kashmir don't address themselves as kashmiri but "kaeshur" and kashmir as "kasheer" in their native language
Let's be honest, Kashmir was under Indian Rule since 1819 when we beat the Afghans at the Battle of Shopian. So almost for 203 years Kashmir has been under Indian Rule from Sikh Empire, Dogra Dynasty, Dominion of India and now Republic of India. Pakistan was only created in 1947 so how can Pakistan claim a region which was under Indian Rule for the last 130 years ?? I am not even talking about China because their occupation of tibet is a completely separate topic.
@@archertroop5784 Indus Valley Civilization was the first Indic Entity on this planet that's when India was Born. Modern Republic of India was born in 1950 CE and Dominion of India in 1947 CE who are just another forms of India.
Thanks for this video. Learnt about how different faith communities coexisted in Kashmir. The history of Kashmir teaches us about the inportance of equality under the law, tolerance and pluralism.
4:27 you are telling that the kingdom of shahmir is accepted by all Hindus and Budhh but you didn't say how he even want to enslave the queen of Kashmir Kota Rani by all meand and want the Islamic rule in valley biased
In 1947 , king hari singh wanted j&k to stay independent but pakistan invaded it and in order to save it, king asked India to help and agreed to merge kashmir with India. So,Indian army pushed back pak army but India's then PM Mr.Nehru reached UN to settle it and LOC was declared as the borderline. Pak and China both have illegally occupied the land
@@nobody99 The same way like Kings which came after shah Mir . There was no caste system in Kashmir . Was Dyad in support of killing of Kashmiri Pandits who refuse to convert . Was she in support to kill and make the bodies drown in jehlum . Was she in support of 6 time exodous of Kashmiri Pandits
@@HelloWorld11332 so you want gemocide? You want to repeat it? This is just justifying what hitler did yk, you have the same logic nigga, like how can you be this dumb man?
What if you just make a video series on kashmiri scholars and philosophers, both hindu and muslims, by keeping nationality and religions aside. You have no idea what this place was in terms of philosophy.
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
7:20 *Lal Ded* or *Lal Dyad (Dyad means "Grandmother")* She was an Iconic Teacher and spiritual leader. Edited: She was against the Hindu Caste System.
There was no caste system in Kashmir . Was Dyad in support of killing of Kashmiri Pandits who refuse to convert . Was she in support to kill and make the bodies drown in jehlum . Was she in support of 6 time exodous of Kashmiri Pandits
0:26 even though the majority population was muslim. REMEMBER THAT THE WHOLE PAKISTAN WAS A HINDU MAJORITY BEFORE PARTITION . ABOUT KASMIR THERE WERE A VAST MAJORITY OF HINDUS ALSO . SECONDLY HOW CAN A NATION BE DIVIDED ON THE NAME OF RELIGION. THE HINDUS ALREADY GAVE THEIR MOST OF THE LAND (PAKISTAN,BANGLADESH )WITHOUT ANY RESISTANCE BUT STILL THOSE TERRORIST NATION WANTS TO WIN WHOLE INDIA.WHAT AN ABSURD DOCUMENTARY. CORRECT YOUR FACTS
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
Yhi to yad nhi arha hai in topiwale ko ....Bar bar apna baap modiji ka nam yad kr rha hai ,inko aur inke nazaiz arbi baap o ko lagta hai mazhub ke bad bharat bana hai 🙂
This channel shows neutral and unbiased history. Is there any region away from arabian peninsula, which became muslim majority voluntarily without violence ?
Southeast Asia. Most of the region's Muslims became Muslims because of trading with the Arabs, like in my country, the Philippines, for example, which has a Muslim minority in the south.
Yep South of India became muslim way before muslim rulers appeared in the North. Also Indonesia. It's a Muslim country, but no one ever went there! Also singapore which a substantial muslim population.
@@bs_slayer7906 so? Kashmir is now MUSLIM! They left that racist ideology and accepted islam. So, Kashmir is Muslim. Directly say that. Everyone left hinduism. Everyone rejected this racist indian myth and converted to Islam!
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj islam is the most racist misogynistic faith ever. Islam literally promotes slavery and sexual abuse wtf you talking about 😂 Kashmir is muslim cuz it was forced to accept islam. Read the history of Islamic expansion mulla
@@bs_slayer7906 kashmiris converted from central asian Shamanism to Zoroasterism to Buddhism to islam.. kashmir has nothing to do with brahminism or hindusim..
No pandit killing is the smallest of all and also kashmiri pandits culturally are more like biharis & UP's people....... They share nothing in common to 90% of Kashmiri............ So i will say Kashmir is kashmir without hindus even better considering their shit sucking habits....
He is sugar coating the facts like every story in the subcontinent of India. islam was spread by the tip of the sword ⚔️🗡️⚔️ not some preaching of so called sufi's. Read 'Bahar-i-stani shai' and 'taufat-ul-ahbab' to understand the reverting of people to islam. But for the fact is even if you know you don't have intellectual honestly to accept that. A so called converted breed.
@@AbhishekRajput-np5mc you're just mad angry😂. Keep crying. Even right now you see non muslims reverting to Islam. And Indians too. That's why your scared govt. had to expel Dr. Zakir Naik out of India.
😂😂Islam is your religion ...no issue ...but by blood relation your identity is kashmiri....Hindu Buddhist Shia Sunni Muslim are all blood brothers....but a religion separated them .....to spread Islam they have to destroy sun temple ....hope brotherhood prevails and kashmiri muslims accept kashmiri Hindus as a same ancestry....❤❤❤
10:48 so Kashmir's Sultan Zain ul-Abideen didn't apply the "Death for Apostasy" rule on his own subjects, rather invited them to abjure Islam, if converted by force of fear? ...and wow! Persian manuscripts with images of Hindu deities 11:12 ...very objective unbiased historical analysis, bro! Are there many enlightened folks in Pakistan, like you? If so, it'd bode well for the future of our embattled subcontinent.
apostasy law in islam only applies on those Apostates who leave islam openly and becomes political threat only first read context of everything islamophobe
I am kashmiri... And I am really thankful for Hamdani (r.a) for coming to kashmir... otherwise I would be some idol worshipper today....A BIG THANKS TO ALL SUFIS WHO CAME TO KASHMIR
You talk kashmiri history and not even mention karkota empire the largest empire of kashmir just cause it dont suit your agenda Its just like talking about Mongolia and not even mentioning Mongol Empire
@ARP yes , the land won't go anywhere (unless the continents shift). We are not talking about land going anywhere but rather we ask for our right to self determination on this land we are native to irrespective of religion. The land is Kashmir and we are called Kashmiris. We speak kashmiri , follow Kashmiri traditions and culture and have roots in this place. India has been largely succesful in portraying our struggle as an "islamic" one and I have to accept we Kashmiris and also Pakistan is largely responsible for that. You might say that kashmiri civlization is an important part of Indian civilization but so are Nepal , Bangladesh , Pakistan. At some point , even south east Asia was an important part of Indian civilization. Are they not separate countries? You never know what will happen in the future. Maybe in the next 200 years we won't get what we want , maybe even in the next 1000 years we won't , maybe in the next 2000 years we won't. We probably won't even exist. And at some point , the Hindu indian civilization didn't even exist (before Proto-Indo-European from central Asia migrated to India) and was a completely different civilation all together. You never know what will happen. Anyways , I just want peace for everyone.
@ARP ok , you should come to Kashmir and talk to the kashmiri Pandits here then. But I don't understand why you will only accept kashmiri Pandit demands? Religious preference? See how religion keeps coming up whenever you talk about Kashmir? This is the problem. I'm not asking for unification with Pakistan and the establishment of an islamic caliphate in Kashmir. I'm asking for an independent Kashmir with Kashmiris living in peace irrespective of religion. Infact not even an independent Kashmir. First , we just want a plebiscite with all Kashmiris irrespective of religion getting a chance to decide their own fate. When most kashmiri muslims asked for freedom from both India , a Hindu majority state and Pakistan , a Muslim majority state , kashmiri Pandits living in India find comfort in India's Hindu majority and want unification with India. So who really is biased here? And again , if you think kashmiri pandits don't want freedom , I wonder how much you really know about Kashmir from books and not news , social media , etc. Do you know who coined the term "Kashmir for Kashmiris"? It was Prem Nath bazaz , a kashmiri Pandit. He wrote many books on Kashmir , one of the best being "History of struggle for freedom in Kashmir". en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prem_Nath_Bazaz
15:00 Kashmir was never given the choice of being independent. Also Pakistan did not invade Kashmir, it were the Muslims of Jammu that rebelled against the maharaja, they wanted to join Pakistan so they started the Azad Kashmir movement which was later on supported by the pashtoons
Ak cheez app na glt boli... Ponch ka Musalmanoo na rebellion start kiya tha aur mera dada ka elder brother b tha un main... Most of them were former British soldiers Jo retire ho chuka tha than Ibrahim Khan Tribal area sa madad mangna GA tha
@@abdulahadkhan557 Yes it was even called the poonch rebellion. But people from mirpur and muzaffarabaad were also involved. Isilye maine jammu Muslims kaha.
F0R c0rReCt hIsToRy. And why should we listen to an upper caste Hindu when casteism is such a stain on humanity? Imagine believing you sre superior because of birth right. Lmfao.
Hey, You mentioned Kashmir's King Joined India despite having a majority Muslim population. You forget the mention that the Hindu King of Hindu majority Amarkot joined Pakistan, the Muslim King of Kapurthala still chose to join India. This should be enough to prove the fact that Kingdom's decision to pick countries was not based on religion rather politics.
Amarkot not a princely state and kapurthala was ruled by a Sikh. First get your facts right before commenting. Also, Hyderabad and Junagadh joined Pakistan but India still invaded them and massacred its Muslims.
Zain ul abideen was no different from his father. He actually had a health issue which couldn't get treated by the hakeems and was on death bed, so one of his ministers told him about Shri Bhatta a Kashmiri Brahmin who could cure him. The soldiers were sent to jungle to find him since Kashmiri Hindus had fled due to religious persecution. It was after his successful treatment that Zain ul Abideen became benevolent towards Kashmiri Brahmins and when he asked Shri Bhatta what does he want as a reward, he asked for resettlement of Kashmiri Brahmins. After that he got named as Budshah.
I am really impressed. U used the term rishis propagating non idol worships too.. some may disagree but Hinduism has never been idol centric only. It has many system of faiths. Shivaism was importantly partly nonidiolatory (nirakar). Hinduism has never mentioned any specific system it has included all the systems of worship. The region of Tibet and Himalayas has influence of worship through meditation since ancient times by rishis.
@Gaytanity 638 ironic, your religion speaks for violence and betrayal, whatever happened with kashmiri pandits was inhumane. And Hinduism is evil?? Such hypocrisy. Don't you fuckin delete my comment again, shows you are afraid of truth.
@nick p but still we pakistanis r satisfied from our religion i think u r not satisfied with your beliefs thats why always showed your frustration in front of us
Pakistan did not simply invade Kashmir. The Maharajah initiated massacres against the Muslim populace which ignited a domestic Muslim uprising against his rule. Read en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Poonch_rebellion
After the Partition of India, during October-November 1947 in the Jammu region of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, many Muslims were massacred and others driven away to West Punjab. The killings were carried out by the forces of Maharaja Hari Singh. It is after the pakistan invaded in 22 October 1947 and massacre happened because 80% troops (mainly muslims) of maharaja hari singh joined hands with Pakistani tribals. He therefore in order to revenge against muslims did massacre. (In Poonch uprising no massacre is noted by any historians). He was indeed a foolish ruler. 👍
@Great Deception which kashmiri attacked indian army in 1947? Lol All the Kashmiris supported indian army against Pakistani tribals. Take your history lessons properly. And jammu Massacre was done by Hari singh not Indian army.
When I first saw arabic(Muslim)name of the channel i thought great another Islamist extremist will try to subvert the real history and portrait Hindus a villains but I got to say he did a good job and told for most part real history without any biases.thank u for that.
6:44 till now you said very less Muslim population, can you please explain from where the population came into the first place along with the ruler no, because as per your statement no conversion in public were made, can you explain how a flourish shavism was prosecuted by Islam Biased
You should have mentioned that dogra actually purchased kashmir from British for 80 lakhs because British couldn't control it. Their rule was never legitimate. If by any chance anyone things their rule was legitimate than that makes the British occupation of India also legitimate. So since British rule was illegal this only implies that their sale of kashmir was also illegal.
By your logic , Ottoman sultan bought the church of Hagia Sophia and converted it onto mosque was never legitimate as well. According to your logic Converting Hagia Sophia into mosque is illegal. Is this what you mean ??
@@T90sGamer Actually, Christian Europe had attacked Muslims first, but Muslim Ottomans fought back and overcame them. So they justly won the land. Jews and Arian Christians were happy because they were no longer persecuted by Trinitarian Christians.
@@zoybean no its the jihad of islam which attack other countries not christans or hindus you attack other civilization and other reacts we hindus lose but christans wins thats how world works , british save hindus from cruel muslim rule and make muslisms powerless and thanks jinnah to take out muslims out of india and make india a hindu majority country.
@@VishalThakur-mb5gi Lol British Christians looted $45 trillion from India, while Mughal rule led India to be more prosperous even than China. Look at the Hindu called Vijay Prashad, he talks about this too even though he is Hindu.
@Sports Entertainment Wahabis never really had any strong Foothold in kashmir ?? Wahhabism didn't existed back then . I was talking about Rulers who were like modern day Wahabis . In general, Hindus were kind of fine among Sufis and shias .
@Sports Entertainment Sufism itself is like an umbrella term in a Point of view, I am not denying that Some or maybe many Sufis were hard toward Hindus politically and Religiously . But in broad scene with Comparison to mainstream fundamentalist interpretation of Islam , Sufis and Shias were Doing fine with Hindus and Buddhists with respect to their differences .
00:22, the Hindu ruler sided with India because the Pakistanis invaded Kashmir. If Pakistan had been more patient they could have had the whole of Kashmir to themselves !
@@rohandutta9986 how many people watch till the end compared to the first 30 seconds. I wrote this comment at 00:30, but didn't change it for the reasons above.
" i am suited up in the hazmat suit, about to enter the comments section tell my family I love them"
lol
No
Lolll that’s a good one brother
You will be missed 👍
I can predict that the comment section has become Chernobyl.
Alhamdulillah. We are forever grateful for our ancestors for accepting Islam. It is because of them we are Muslim today. We can't thank them enough in this life. Being a Muslim is an honour. Lots of good wishes from Kashmir.
Alhamdulillah❤
Pathetic
And being a dogra hindu we are also grateful to our ancestors that despite tge atrocities of muslim rulers they remain tge same. Not like others.
@@sanjeevsingh-tp1cr atrocities?
Jammu massacre of muslims?
Hari singh oppression on innocent kashmiris?
@@sanjeevsingh-tp1cr landuwa give one example when your grandfathers were been to atrocities?
Your mind is full of gobar
Great video. But Hrishis are Hindus, while you say in the video that Hrishis are a Sufi order of Muslims.
He is talking about rishi order of kashmir(lal ded,nund resh)
Reshi* to be exact. Sufi and Bhakti traditions were inter-mixed. This was confusing for me too until I thought about the Baba Reshi shrine.
@Ali Ajmeri You have a point, yes, but many bhakts were considered Sufis too, including Guru Nanak etc. The bhakti movement was very intertwined with Sufi traditions.
@Ali Ajmeri Guru Nanak was seen as a Sufi in many shrines and there was no "Sikhism" in his time. That developed later on. Know your timeline atleast. There's even a story of a dispute between muslims and Hindus as to bury his body or burn it because they both considered him to be from their faith. Your knowledge lacks too much basic history.
@Ali Ajmeri You're confusing modern seperate practices with that of the old. They're too different to be compared
He found you lost and guided uhhhhhh….. allhumdilluah being Muslim❤❤❤❤…. Thank you myyyy ansestors ❤❤
Kashmir was a golden kingdom under Laladitya I . His empire was from Bengal to Caspian sea. It was also Hindu.
But what matters is that It was a Kashmiri dynasty and he was a Kashmiri
Their ancestors were foreign huns.
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj they converted into Hinduism
@@053_eshan9 kasmiri pandits were also kashmiri 🙂
@@SocialAffairs56 They were puppets of Gujratis and others so f&&k them.
Thank you for this upload. Amongst all the videos that we see online on Kashmir, this one really does justice to the region - unbiased, unprovocative, you have not taken sides, which most other commentators do. You have only presented the facts as they may have happened,and, I must say, I didn't know half or more of it till I watched this video. So, thank you.
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
He didn't even mention the massacres did by them to convert the masses. What unbiased? He HAS taken sites.
The time of sikandar Shah rule for 20 years was the worst for Hinduism. Rishis order of Sufis is nothing but a way to fool Hindus along with lalli.
I am so happy that one of my favourite TH-camr has made a video about Kashmir. I am a Kashmiri. It was so good to know about our History. I wish this stuff was thaught in schools. Thank you so much bro!!
It is taught in History Graduation
@@Mr.A71 i hope they dont teach what ever he is saying
No we don't need your history teach it to your kids at home
Madrsa history
Islam spreads through Sword..
Islam didnt spread by sword ..only islamic teritories spread by sword .
@@asadahmad6587 both islam and Christianity were spread by sword , it's ridiculous to deny that
Not for the case of south east asia
thank you so much, i am kashmiri and working on a school documentary project and this was really great !
What an amazing historical video, surely the comment section would be peaceful and loving!
Not bad! Here's some additional context that I think the viewers might be interested in:
* The etymology of Kashmir is likely traced to the Hindu saint Kashyapa.
* Kashmiris are known to have worshipped the sun god Surya, with many temples still standing in the region to prove as a testament to this
* Rinchan's first choice was to convert to Hinduism, but was rejected by a popular priest due to his Tibetan ancestry. It's a tantalising what if.
Wrong.. Kashyapa is a mythological character. Truth being not one scientifically valid study has been made till date to assess the ancestry of Kashmiris. However, the physical characteristics clearly are more akin to middle eastern races
@@taby9756 Kashyapa was true personality than ur entire existence
@@taby9756 u r a very ignorant person. Anything nd everything which doesn't suits ur mindset nd propaganda is a myth.... o waoo 😂
Ur nd anyone's Religious biases can not cover the truth .
@@infinity-hr3qi first go and read that entire story shrouded in myths from the get go. Just one more attempt to try and potray kashmir as a hindu domain. We Kashmiris know where our ancestors came from. I bet ur ignorant little mind would not even have heard names of those places or civilizations.
@@taby9756 Oh....come on , if Rishi Kashyap is a mythical character then, so is Mohammad.....as there are no scientific evidences that he existed....
There are just literary references to him similar to the ancient records of literary evidence mentioning Rishi Kashyap in Vedas as one of the Saptarishis....
And mind u if the stories of Rishi Kashyap are myths .....then, so are stories regarding Mohammad which are also exaggerated as hell....
So, how can u be so sure that Mohammad existed, if Kashyap did not??
And do not doubt the historicity of the ancient Vedic records.....historians and analysts have certainly traced it about 3500 years ago.....
Al Muqaddimah is the best channel on islamic history
- Emir Timur gurkan
It's not. He said hadith are 200 years old but the earliest Hadith works we have is around 100 years from death of Prophet.
@@maxpayne3628
Is still not authentic.
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
@@GabrieLight the chain of narrations disagree with you
I like how you specify "pakistan invaded Kashmir and Hari Singh signed the accession with India" instead of so called unbiased documentaries who avoid it all together and just say "pakistan and India started fighting over kashmir"
Unfortunately his sources are Wikipedia which is highly biased and pro hindutva version. You will literally see Hindu as source for articles.
And you conveniently left out the fact of the Jammu massacre.
@@hassanahmed9093you left islamic invasions of india who called them to invade india?
Two wrongs don’t make a right
@@hassanahmed9093 you correct your wrong, we will correct our mistake.
Then the Real Question is who is actually Kashmiri?
Demographic change due to forced conversion,Genocide,Exodus gives the title of Kashmiri to the present so called Kashmiri people?
It’s part of Indian culture since millenniums
The video literally said kashmir was an isolated region for most part of the millennium. Also there is no such thing as called "indian culture". Sub-continent culture is a collection of a large number of local cultures which did influence one another but at the same time can be easily differentiated from one another. There was no one India or Indian culture. It's always has been collection of different kingdoms and large number of local cultures. Regarding the indigenous kashmir, all of them are real kashmir as majority of them had converted to Islam. Them converting to a different religion doesn't make less of a kashmiri.
The Kashmir was never Ethincally changed. Sure Conversions happened and some people left.
But before Kashmir was Hindu it was quite Buddhist.
But the Leftover Population was also Kashmiris.
Subcontinent is made sub local cultures of different people.
That's why you have so many different Languages. Hindus are not an ethinic Monolith.
Local people changing there religion doesn't mean they are not indigenous to the land anymore.Kashmiri are the only left Kashmiri.
Definately it was originally was a non isalmic , polytheist state ...They were force converted into islaam reason being they had no option either they would die or accepted islaam ..
@@luckysharma4593 actually according to rajtarangni our kashmiri buddist ancestors were prosecuted by indian hindus but if we look at islam in kashmir, most of kashmiris choose islam by their choice. Be it richina or shahmir or chaks.
There's no such thing as a homogeneous 'Indian culture'
All praise to Allah for sending us the message
fake message by fake Baba
you're gonna get famous, Indians will start flooding this channel
Muslims will. Not Indians.
@@alex-sv8ru we muslims are indian 😐
He means Indians will start flooding this channel to spread their propaganda
@@alex-sv8ru Indians bro.. Indians!!!!! This channel is awesome.. i appreciate it.
And don't look everyone from the eyes of religion.
And they'd already hate him, he's Pakistani after all.
I love the animated maps with the clouds! Somewhat random question, but do you like the song "Kashmir" by Led Zeppelin? There's a live version of it on TH-cam with an Egyptian orchestra.
Thank you! Hadn't heard it before but I like it now. Thank you for telling me about it. ;)
@@AlMuqaddimahYT You're welcome and wow, you shot up to and past 100,000 subs really quickly!
@@AlMuqaddimahYT this is not a Persian land , it is hindu land and important hindu sites have been destroyed and for many centuries, the rituals have not been performed due to destruction of temples. Will have to reclaim the land and start the rituals.
@@vishnuvardhan3047 You literally didn't even watch the video
It was never persian land, but was persianized
@@vishnuvardhan3047 kashmir muslim and pandit .... Both are saka Scythians !!! They invaded Indus valley !!!!
You missed the genocide of Kashmiri pandits after 1947 which led to make Kashmir almost Hindus free
even if you involve kashmiri pandits living outside of kashmir today , Mulsims in kashmir still make the 95% population . and secondly , i hope you don't compare 360 kashmiri pandits that died to over thousands of Kashmiri Muslims dying for decades ??
@@dutchvanderlinde9488 "I'll compare deaths in numbers. Haha. So cool". Be ashamed. Thank you.
@@dutchvanderlinde9488 no why should I compare the dead I just told the reality, I think you have something to do with the comparison over their religious backgrounds
@@divyankpandey3431 If you think I was comparing them I understood you wrong . I do not belittle kashmiri pandits and their struggle . But i came from the position , where I have seen plenty of Indians belittling Kashmiri Muslims and their sufferings with a tag line of “ what about Kashmiri pandits “ .
@@dutchvanderlinde9488 how can you be so sure that only 360 people died? Many have died. And the Muslims in Kashmir have been dominant forces. They haven't been massacred until poonch massacre and in turn the Jammu massacre happened and of course the ten massacres of Shias by mughals...
Take care brother..
Please do some history of Somalia. One of the oldest mosques that still has two Qiblas (one facing Jerusalem) is still there
I just learned some stuff about Harra and Timbuktu.. also Somalia and the region has had a loong and interesting history, with Islam and prior
@@IBrainedMyDamage yes Alhamdulillh I am Somali Muslim and we are proud to be Muslim. We Somalis people Became Muslim at the time of prophet Muhammad PBUH and the six century. We love our religion Islam.
2:21 what is the base or source to say that it has been rebalion at that time Kashmir was flourishing like none other, sharda peeth was one of the most prosperous university with great scholars, the level of education and scripture on tantra and shaivism is still astonishing
This video has a lot of errors, just consider it as entertainment
Exactly!!
This guy is a Pakistani, don't take his videos too seriously
@@andyistphdhpc2726 bro he is mostly unbiased i have seen his other videos and here too i think he has tried his best
Re mulla ka channel hai kyu serious le rhe ho,hai to kuch nhi asia me banaya bhi kuch nhi wo apne subscribers ko khwab dikha rha hai apna bata kar hath se jo chala jayega
A fair documentary and not influenced by either side of the border.. Well Done and keep up the good work !
Desh to ek hi hai aur tha kya border border khel rha hai ?
@@rajababu42010 shut up paajeet.
@@GrigRP you shut up ,go and read some indigenous ancient books ,all contains information about kashmira then come here
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
fair?? he ignore all of the history of kashmir before islamic rule
The video was really informative. You were the first youtuber who was unbiased . Kudos 👏🏻👏🏻
Are you a Kashmiri pandit??
I see your cast is kanna
@@Best-jj6zt no, I'm not a kashmiri pandit
@@Best-jj6zt Khanna is a surname found among Khatris who are ethnically Punjabis, but many Khatri communities are found in Jammu region as well
@@aarushkhanna2749 actually my surname is kanna that's why I thought you are a Kashmiri pandit too 😄
If they hadn't converted, it would have been much peaceful place today .
No it's just Pakistan is wrong and India is wrong and Kashmiris are still not independent like they want that doesn't mean they're not proud to be Muslim they have so much love for Islam
@@aosel-gharably1070 india is not wrong, their king signed to be with indi, its legally belongs to india. We are just on the legal side.
@@sarthaksingh501 india is oppressing them talk to a kashmiri all them if they like how India treats them and ask them if they want to be a part of India
@@aosel-gharably1070 Legally that land belongs to India and no one is opressing them, if you unecessarily pick arms against army, what do you except the army to do, they too have families.
@@aosel-gharably1070 my friend in Kashmir very free actually
Alhamdulillah. Islam came to Kashmir and we became muslims
Loved your video bro. Love 'em all. From your country Pakistan ❤️
How were the Kashimiris ruling themselves when all the rulers were Turks/Persians/Afghans?? Such a weird slave mindset where people start idolizing their oppressors. It happens to such an extent that people start hating their own culture and history. You tried to sound objective but couldn't help leave your bias with the last comment.
@NigerianBroda your name is nigerianbroda and you claim to know more about India than Indians?, Caste system has very less influence in modern day India, on the contrary people from "lower" caste are given many benefits in educational institutions and government jobs, just talking pure BS out here because someone differs from your biased point of view, stop following the herd mentality and try to understand actual reality.
Lol did you see the video? Where he mentioned Turks, Etc ruling Kashmiris?
Yes, Kashmiris lost their sovereignty to Mughals, who we never accepted. But before that Kashmir existed as an independent sovereign state ruled by Kashmiris of different origins.
10:37 till that time forcefully the ethnicity of Kashmir has been changed, the Sharda peeth, the temples had been destroyed by true Islam. Pathetic | biased
Kashmir was muslim, is muslim and will be mualim forever.... From Bangladesh
@@darthvader6110leave Kashmir bhai , Vangdesh was Hindu, and will be Hindu
@@tusharjindal1954 Pura hindustan banega pakistan 😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜
@@tusharjindal1954 agli 20 sal me varat me 60 crore muslim ho jayega hahahaa
@@tusharjindal1954 bangladesh was lower cast. Now muslim
History has been rightly represented by you.
Love from a Dogra Hindu (from Jammu) 👏
jammu is not kashmir!jammu is dogri and hindu and sikh,kashmir is muslim and kashmiri
@@sowdha79 who said jammu is kashmir
@@sowdha79 bro chill
Kashyapamir ( after Maharishi Kashyap) is kashmir and Kingdom of Raja Jambolochan is Jammu... beautiful piece of land created by God on earth's surface...it's also land of Nandarishis...mystic Bharat🙏
@@sowdha79 no kashmira name has sanskrit origin ,it has nothing to do with islam
7:25 wish you can learn about hinduism first before using devi Lalleshwari to use for putting your ideology, that how earlier hinduism was bad and how Sufism is great and admired order, the land of Martand sun temple, the land of kashyapa, the outstanding sharda path existed and people were proud of their heritage, Lalledhwari was preacher of nirgun bhakti which is very much Hindu and not similar to Islam. biased
as a kashmiri hindu, well I have to say she indeed mixed concepts of sufism and nirgun bhakti and bridged the gap between hindus and muslims. pls try to understand islam flourished in kashmir due to sufism,and it promoted communal harmony. Lal Ded actually influenced many hindus,especially lower castes to get converted to islam because it was simple and free from priesthood. Even many muslim mystics derived inspirations of their preachings from shaivism so it was intermixed.
A small correction to your video is necessary, otherwise, it is a great video: Afghanistan through its official non-recognition of the Durand Line, also claims a portion of Kashmir.
Personally, I find that the claim lacks merit, but it is technically a claim.
Their claim is from Chitral to Bolan havent seen kashmier
Good joke! 👍
@@Malik-ts3vw Like I said, I personally find the claim to lack merit, but the government continues to perpetuate the claim.
@@blacksheep6174 You might be right. I've seen a map of the claim that doesn't include it as well as some that claim a piece of it. The Afghan government fails to make the claim clear.
@@sfnzmi They cannot Claim bcoz Afghan Govt is Allied To India and 40% of Kashmir is Under indian occupation Whole Valley and Ladakh and Kpk Balochistan was Annexed by british frm afghan emirate but Kashmir went into Sikhs hands even before british and there was no agreement for kashmir like in bw emirate nd british .
Al Muqaddimah;
You lack basics of Indian history - sadly its not uncommon at all. Its not "Umaad caliphate" (as you pronounce it at 1:54) but 'Ummayyad Caliphate' - in English. I will leave pronunciation mistakes made in this video at this - I was expecting a Muslim to pronounce at least such well-known phrases/words accurately.
You also mention (2:08) existence of "Islamic emirates", another example exhibiting lack of cursory understanding of Indian history. To claim these monarchies or in some cases feudatories to be "Islamic emirates" is akin to claiming modern-day France being a Christian state - just because France is culturally Christian and holds onto liberalism which rose from Christianity. Sadly, I see a total lack of understanding even of the gist of Indian history.
Shockingly you also claim, "Islam finally broke into India on the back of Mahmud of Ghazni's horse." (2:20)
Firstly, this is blatant and gross misrepresentation of Indian history especially the history of Islam in "India". Unfortunately, many Pakistanis are taught this farce. Even the most unread person in India at least knows that Islam flourished in southern-"India" (Malabar coastal regions) way before Muhammad ibn Qasim, thanks to the Arab merchants and settlers! Ironically, even Islamophobes don't dispute this.
Secondly, there was no "India" back then (this is a fact which most modern Indians themselves don't understand). The so-called Indian subcontinent has for the most of the time, till the arrival of Central-Asian rulers, been made of different and divided mandalas, kingdoms, monarchies, feudatories, headed by different leaders, kings, rulers or chiefs - except for the Buddhist ruler Ashok who conquered most of these and covered almost entire 'Indian subcontinent'.
For instance, before the arrival of Muhammad ibn Qasim, territories of Sindh were ruled by Raja Dahir - a Hindu - whilst the majority of the population was Buddhist. Before Raja Dahir, the "Rai-dynasty" (Buddhist) ruled over the territories of Sindh.
All in all, to claim that advent of Islam in India coincides with Mahmud Ghaznawi entering India and, even hinting at the idea of an existence of "India" are both ridiculous and far away from objective and factual history. The concept of a "state" is a modern one and unknown to ancient people of the land referred to as the "Indian subcontinent".
Apart from this there are several historical and other inaccuracies in your videos, one example is of 'Jizyah', it isn't "a head-tax on non-Muslims" as you claim. Jizyah is to be paid by the able-bodied young non-Muslim men who weren't a part of the army (of the kingdom) defending the kingdom. Females, children, mendicants, the destitute, old and, those able-bodied non-Muslim men in the kingdom's army didn't have to pay Jizyah. Muslims paid Zakah to the king and his treasury, which was higher than Jizyah and was applicable on males, females, old and young (15 or above) irrespective of the fact whether or not the men were a part of the army of the kingdom or not - until and unless they were destitute (below nisaab). Thus, if Jizyah is a "tax", so is "Zakah" which was always higher than Jizyah and was applicable on all Muslims.
I suggest that you do deep-researches instead of cursory ones to understand the real history of what is today called the Indian subcontinent.
Agreed,
Many Pakistanis think islam entered india through Makran or Khyber Pass but Oldest Mosque is in Southern India
@Mario Fonseca There was Nothing Like india ... there were kingdoms principalities Not a Great united state called india
@Mario Fonseca;
I don't know which part of India you come from but apparently you don't know much about India - I assume you are an Indian. Because most Indians are ignorant of their own history and religion(s) so much so that they have been brainwashed to equate myth with history - I don't expect much from Pakistanis either. To help you understand what I said in my previous comment, the so-called "Indian subcontinent" region was never one state (which are a modern phenomenon) with one name in ancient times. Ashok and Aurangzeb were two monarchs who conquered (or gain allegiance of) almost the entire Indian subcontinent.
If you read the most ancient Hindu texts, the name of the region where Hindus resided was called 'Aryavarta' (in other texts its also called as Bharat-varsha). For example, Manu-smriti the most important and famous dharma-shastra (texts on Hindu jurisprudence, legislation et cetera) states that,
"आ समुद्रात् तु वै पूर्वादा समुद्राच्च पश्चिमात् ।
तयोरेवान्तरं गिर्योरार्यावर्तं विदुर्बुधाः ॥ २२ ॥
ā samudrāt tu vai pūrvādā samudrācca paścimāt |
tayorevāntaraṃ giryorāryāvartaṃ vidurbudhāḥ || 22 ||
The country extending as far as the Eastern Ocean and as far as the Western Ocean, and lying between the same two mountains,-the learned know as ‘Āryāvarta.’ (22)." [1]
To explain this shloka (verse) I quote the famous commentator of Manu-smriti, Medhatithi, who notes,
"The particle ‘āṅ’ (in ‘āsamudrāt’) indicates the outer not the inner boundary, and it does not indicate inclusion. Hence the islands in the oceans do not come under ‘Āryāvarta.’ What are mentioned here are the four boundaries of the country: the Eastern Ocean on the east, the Western Ocean on the west, the Hiṁālaya on the north and the Vindhya on the south. In as much as these two mountains have been mentioned as ‘boundaries,’ they are not included under ‘Āryāvarta’; from this people might be led to conclude that one should not inhabit these mountains. And with a view to (avoiding) this possibility, the Author adds the next verse.-(22)" [2]
All in all, most Hindu-texts demarcate Bharat-varsha or Aryavarta to be the land-mass between "the Hiṁālaya on the north and the Vindhya on the south" and the two seas-oceans on both sides. So, if we take this definition, current day India is much larger than Arya-varta or Bharat-varsha of the olden times. Interestingly, most Indian states/territories (Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andaman and Nicobar, Lakshwadeep and huge part of Odisha) which are beyond the Vindhya ranges was never considered to be a part of Arya-varta in ancient times, rather were called ‘mlecchadeśa’, 'andhra' et cetera. Mlecchas - a derogatory epithet - were non-Hindus just like Hindu-scholars have been calling Muslims 'mlecchas' since the advent of Islam in India.
You can say that modern-day India is made-up of Aryavarta, mlecchadesh, andhra et cetera. If I were to reply to you in your language "India is a rump state that has been Sankrit-ising, Hindi-ising and Hindu-ising its diverse population."
How hard is it to understand that in ancient times there was no concept of 'state' rather there were mandalas, feudatories, kingdoms that made-up the region politically, this region is called the "Indian subcontinent" today. Others (foreigners) called a part of this region (the Indian subcontinent), specifically speaking the Indus valley, as Hindush, Indika, Indos, Sindh (Hind) and from this came modern names like Hindustan, India et cetera which are today applied to an entire country.
I hope this gives you a bit of more clarity - please feel free to ask me if you are still in doubt. Indians seriously need an education - they should be reading real history and not myths and lies propagated by the Hindu-revivalists, Hindutva-vadis, dharma-gurus, Pandits and pathetic politicians.
_________________
[1] MANUSMṚTI: With the ‘Manubhāṣya’ of Medhātithi, trans. Ganganath Jha
(Reprint; Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1999), vol. 3, pp.235- 236.
[2] Ibid, 236.
@@blacksheep6174 modern state did exist after 1947, but it's shape was already defined since antiquity. the British only locked that Border by end of 19th century and later carved it to please both Jinnah and Nehru. well, especially Jinnah.
India donate Kashmir by Pakistani hand but one reason that is Pakistan must take Indian 20 crore Muslim. If kashmiri Muslim do not live in India why Muslim live other state in India.
ask kashmir what they want
@@mkfarooqdotcom jab India Pakistan ka taksim hua tha tab kaun sa Pakistan aur Bangladesh mein hinduon se poochha tha Kashmir mein maharaja Hari Singh ne to accession kiya tha India ke sath. Hinduon ko kya Mila .Musalman ko 3 state Mila Pakistan Bangladesh or secular India. Aur Hindu log Pakistan Bangladesh se apna Ghar chhodkar Refugee ki tarah India mein rahata hai. Aapko kaise maloom hoga refugee hona Kitna taklif hota hai.
@@Radhakrishna14369 🥸
Pakistan was crossing the border to Kashmir and trying to invade Kashmir, that's why the king joined Indian alliance.
Another excellent video. I learn so much with every post.
As a kashmiri ,I had no idea about the things you mentioned in the video. As we are currently under occupation we are not taught kashmiri history in schools.I would really appreciate it if you would be able to make more videos like this in future.
Edit:Thank you for the unbiased telling of the history.
Which occupation are you talking about
@@paramitabanerjee7495 indian occupation, don't be so smug
@@paramitabanerjee7495 Right now Indian occupation and by chance if they get independence Pakistan will quickly slide in to take control either directly or by installing a puppet government. Kashmir needs a strong military and good relation with neighboring countries to truly get independence.
@@truthprevails8836 u can freely live India. It was a hindu state from start handed over by hindu ruler.
@@truthprevails8836 kashmir is hindu for longer time then other states
Sufism is still good and respected in India ..but hardcover Islam is still bad and will be criticized by India .
By the way, speaking as a person of mixed Hindu-Sikh India origin, I must say your channel is remarkably fair when handling delicate issues
Just one request, as a new subscriber, how can I find out what books/journals/sources you use? The channel is very informative but while quoting historical information I like to have something to refer to besides a youtube channel (Albeit one of high quality). ?
@@iqbalhasadhd The Kashmiri Pandits were native to that region, we have seen enough of what happened to them. If Pakistanis can help one sect of Kashmiri then we can surely help the other. Anyway, Pakistan is slowly imploding so I assume your kind will soon be up shizz creek without a paddle, especially given the Modi government is present in India.
Shah Mir was indeed from the Tajik Swati ruling family of Swat (a kingdom that encompassed tge old Gandhara area and was a Ghurid - Delhi Sultanate vassal). They were indigenous Tajik Dehqans of the Gandhara and Badakhshan region. They were also called "Gabri" indicating their original Zoroastrian background. After the Yusufzai Afghans invaded Swat with the assistance of Babur the Mughal in 1520, the Swatis were overthrown and displaced. They now call themselves Pathans and speak both Pashto and Hindko. They originally spoke Gabri (Zoroastrian Dari). They patronised and facilitated the prominent Muslim mystic of Kashmir, a Persian by the name of Shah-i- Hamadan. I myself am a Swati. Shah Mir himself was a Swati adventurer from Batkhela town in today's Malakand Division of KP in Pakistan. He supposedly went to Kashmir after his father saw a dream in which he saw his son as king of Kashmir. The Shahmiri Tajik rule was finally put paid to by Akbar, Babur's grandson, although they still figure prominently in Kashmiri society.
Shahmiris were Kashmirized and spoke Kashmiri. Because his ancestors were living in Kashmir for centuries. And Shahmiri Kingdom was called the Kashmiri Kingdom by themselves as well as modern historians. Their descendants live in Kashmir and are proud Kashmiris.
There is no pure ancestry in the world. They may have tajik ancestry but they were Kashmiris.
Even before being tajik, they were something else.
Shahmiri's were Kashmiris.
Aghr shahmir swati ta .wo pir wo kashmiri nahi hay .kashmiri r not pathans
Gabri are dardic in origin the theory of them being tajik has been proven falss
@@AbdullahKhan-yz7ceswatis are dardic in origin
@Al Muqaddimah
I'm from Kashmir and I wanted to read al Muqaddimah of Ibn al-Khaldoon. Is there a prerequisite I should go through or can I jump straight into the book? I also wanted to know the English version I should prefer.
There is a pdf of the book online in English
I live in India and always support Kashmir as part of India
but after 70 yrs of abrogation of temporary art370 but not art371 and no referendum promised 70 yrs back i see my viewpoint changing
why ?? bcoz u don't want non muslims in Kashmir???
@@duncanbrown3448 I want return of Pandits in Kashmir, but what about northeast why there is still 371 and if you want to end temporary articles so perform the promised referendum which will decide final fate.
@@furqanshariff if you believe in the two nation theory then get the fuck out of this country, the basis of india's claim to kashmir is completely legal as both the monarch of the dogra dynasty as well as the most popular Democratic leader of that time agreed that kashmir should be in India if diverse countries like India or Pakistan were to conduct referendums that easily both of the countries would collapse into a mess of dozens of states fighting for each other's territory
You are a Muslim. So you support other Muslim nation. It is not a big deal . Everyone knows it.
@@furqanshariff you are a Muslim and you don't support India. It is a known fact. You bow down to Mecca and follow Arabic culture. You belong to Arabs not Indian. So pack your bag and go to your country or if you don't want to go then you and your family has to be Indianized.
He mentions how the Kashmiri Pandits arrived on the scene, and that the likes of Aurangzeb liked to visit Kashmir... but doesn't mention that the emperor had a campaign to kill or convert the Kashmiri Pandits! A pretty large omission it seems.
source
@@mkfarooqdotcom the same way how Zoarasthian majority Persia was invaded by Arabs and forcefully converted into a Muslim majority present day Iran. The world's first imperialist way before Europe were the Arabs who propagated their culture and language in the name of religion
FYI: Nowadays these same makhdoomi etc consider themselves as pure blood of noble islamic lineage and doesn’t marry outside their family.
Basically Kashmiri Muslims in general have not left their hindu ideologies at all.
Im excited for the content, and the comment section!
Comment section, at this point atleast, is calm
@@seesaw7320 sometimes its ok to be wrong!
@@seesaw7320 wait for the pakistanis to come and spew their bigotry against Hinduism
@Umeed bigotry is clearly written in the books written by education system in pakistan. You should read what they have to say about Hindus
@Umeed first read what's written about Hindus in Pakistani school books then we will talk abdul
Thanks 🙏 I admire your honest report about my motherland. Kashmiris don't report like this about their land like you have given facts about the history.
many people who have read history of kashmir would say the word "kashmir" comes from the word "khas" as it was used to address kashmiri people before mughal invaded it.
and a point people of kashmir don't address themselves as kashmiri but "kaeshur" and kashmir as "kasheer" in their native language
I love the video editing! nicely presented
Let's be honest, Kashmir was under Indian Rule since 1819 when we beat the Afghans at the Battle of Shopian. So almost for 203 years Kashmir has been under Indian Rule from Sikh Empire, Dogra Dynasty, Dominion of India and now Republic of India.
Pakistan was only created in 1947 so how can Pakistan claim a region which was under Indian Rule for the last 130 years ??
I am not even talking about China because their occupation of tibet is a completely separate topic.
Indian rule? bruh my grandmother is older than India
@@archertroop5784 Oh so your Grandmother was born before 3300 BCE. Send my best wishes to her for living for 5300+ years.
@@indiafirst3676 bruh u are confused between indus valley civilization and india 😂🤣
@@archertroop5784 Indus Valley Civilization was the first Indic Entity on this planet that's when India was Born.
Modern Republic of India was born in 1950 CE and Dominion of India in 1947 CE who are just another forms of India.
@@indiafirst3676 oh so u mean India as a nation existed even in Bc?
Also if yes then what was Bharat and hind
Just asking I dont know much about this
Thanks for this video. Learnt about how different faith communities coexisted in Kashmir. The history of Kashmir teaches us about the inportance of equality under the law, tolerance and pluralism.
4:27 you are telling that the kingdom of shahmir is accepted by all Hindus and Budhh but you didn't say how he even want to enslave the queen of Kashmir Kota Rani by all meand and want the Islamic rule in valley biased
In 1947 , king hari singh wanted j&k to stay independent but pakistan invaded it and in order to save it, king asked India to help and agreed to merge kashmir with India. So,Indian army pushed back pak army but India's then PM Mr.Nehru reached UN to settle it and LOC was declared as the borderline. Pak and China both have illegally occupied the land
What about kashmiri civilian ?🙄
@@snipescyth7944 keep crying about pandits 🤣🤣🤣
the raja was doing genocide, go read history
@@nobody99 The same way like Kings which came after shah Mir .
There was no caste system in Kashmir . Was Dyad in support of killing of Kashmiri Pandits who refuse to convert .
Was she in support to kill and make the bodies drown in jehlum .
Was she in support of 6 time exodous of Kashmiri Pandits
@@HelloWorld11332 so you want gemocide? You want to repeat it?
This is just justifying what hitler did yk, you have the same logic nigga, like how can you be this dumb man?
What if you just make a video series on kashmiri scholars and philosophers, both hindu and muslims, by keeping nationality and religions aside. You have no idea what this place was in terms of philosophy.
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
It shows polarization doesn't work. Sultan zain ul abideen's period is known as golden period of kashmir.
Keywords: conquest, invade. That speaks it all.
7:20 *Lal Ded* or *Lal Dyad (Dyad means "Grandmother")* She was an Iconic Teacher and spiritual leader.
Edited:
She was against the Hindu Caste System.
There was no caste system in Kashmir . Was Dyad in support of killing of Kashmiri Pandits who refuse to convert .
Was she in support to kill and make the bodies drown in jehlum .
Was she in support of 6 time exodous of Kashmiri Pandits
And she was against idol worship
0:26 even though the majority population was muslim.
REMEMBER THAT THE WHOLE PAKISTAN WAS A HINDU MAJORITY BEFORE PARTITION .
ABOUT KASMIR THERE WERE A VAST MAJORITY OF HINDUS ALSO .
SECONDLY HOW CAN A NATION BE DIVIDED ON THE NAME OF RELIGION.
THE HINDUS ALREADY GAVE THEIR MOST OF THE LAND (PAKISTAN,BANGLADESH )WITHOUT ANY RESISTANCE BUT STILL THOSE TERRORIST NATION WANTS TO WIN WHOLE INDIA.WHAT AN ABSURD DOCUMENTARY.
CORRECT YOUR FACTS
This is the most sane video about kashmir thanks
Great video, I never really knew how this happened. Thanks for teaching me something new
Being a Kashmiri Pandit I can say Kashmiri Hindus were converted by fanatics or radicals of Islam .They have killed so many Hindus that there 7 pillars of Janeu (a Hindu Thread) . They keep it because that was way easier than counting dead bodies . That was the first genocide of Kashmiri Pandits . His whole video is like some sort of propoganda for showing Islam as a peaceful religion .
excellent video!
very well knew hindu supported to destruction of buddhism thats why they never had a another ashoka
At the end you ignored the Kashmir's real habitat the Kashmiris not the Mallechh .
Yhi to yad nhi arha hai in topiwale ko ....Bar bar apna baap modiji ka nam yad kr rha hai ,inko aur inke nazaiz arbi baap o ko lagta hai mazhub ke bad bharat bana hai 🙂
Keep crying the real inhabitants conveyed to Islam 😂
@@zakariamattu8613
Remove your surname. You low Life Brhman converted dogla zaleel kashir mlechha koum
@@ddsharma9793 you are upset because my ancestors converted 😂 cope
@@ddsharma9793 you fool if I was still Hindu u would be kidding my feet
This channel shows neutral and unbiased history. Is there any region away from arabian peninsula, which became muslim majority voluntarily without violence ?
Southeast Asia. Most of the region's Muslims became Muslims because of trading with the Arabs, like in my country, the Philippines, for example, which has a Muslim minority in the south.
Yep South of India became muslim way before muslim rulers appeared in the North. Also Indonesia. It's a Muslim country, but no one ever went there! Also singapore which a substantial muslim population.
China
The Sahel and the Horn of Africa
Kashmir is muslim
Ladakh is buddhist
Jammu is hindu and sikhs
This thing should be kept in mind
Kashmir Valley wasn’t muslim until it was converted to one. Most Kashmiri are Brahmin converts
@@bs_slayer7906 so? Kashmir is now MUSLIM!
They left that racist ideology and accepted islam. So, Kashmir is Muslim.
Directly say that.
Everyone left hinduism. Everyone rejected this racist indian myth and converted to Islam!
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj islam is the most racist misogynistic faith ever. Islam literally promotes slavery and sexual abuse wtf you talking about 😂 Kashmir is muslim cuz it was forced to accept islam. Read the history of Islamic expansion mulla
@@bs_slayer7906 kashmiris converted from central asian Shamanism to Zoroasterism to Buddhism to islam.. kashmir has nothing to do with brahminism or hindusim..
Kashmir is muslim, half of ladakh is muslim , half of jammu is muslim .. note that fact !!
The history of Kashmir will always be incomplete without mentioning the Kashmiri Pandit Exodus of 1990.
And incomplete without mentioning the betrayal of india
No pandit killing is the smallest of all and also kashmiri pandits culturally are more like biharis & UP's people....... They share nothing in common to 90% of Kashmiri............ So i will say Kashmir is kashmir without hindus even better considering their shit sucking habits....
Thank God our ancestors reverted to Islam. What a blessing ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّٰهِ,
That's a shame u people bow ur knees toward a invaders but we didn't
He is sugar coating the facts like every story in the subcontinent of India. islam was spread by the tip of the sword ⚔️🗡️⚔️ not some preaching of so called sufi's.
Read 'Bahar-i-stani shai' and 'taufat-ul-ahbab' to understand the reverting of people to islam.
But for the fact is even if you know you don't have intellectual honestly to accept that.
A so called converted breed.
@@AbhishekRajput-np5mc you're just mad angry😂. Keep crying. Even right now you see non muslims reverting to Islam. And Indians too. That's why your scared govt. had to expel Dr. Zakir Naik out of India.
Lol ' Bhat ' muslims 😅
Islam is our identify our pride, we are kashmiries
😂😂Islam is your religion ...no issue ...but by blood relation your identity is kashmiri....Hindu Buddhist Shia Sunni Muslim are all blood brothers....but a religion separated them .....to spread Islam they have to destroy sun temple ....hope brotherhood prevails and kashmiri muslims accept kashmiri Hindus as a same ancestry....❤❤❤
kashmiri hindu and kashmiri sikhs are also hindu and sikhs
😄
Kashmiri identy is hindu ..read ancient history of kashmir first gadhe ..islam invades in 1300 century ..a many years later ...
10:48 so Kashmir's Sultan Zain ul-Abideen didn't apply the "Death for Apostasy" rule on his own subjects, rather invited them to abjure Islam, if converted by force of fear? ...and wow! Persian manuscripts with images of Hindu deities 11:12 ...very objective unbiased historical analysis, bro! Are there many enlightened folks in Pakistan, like you? If so, it'd bode well for the future of our embattled subcontinent.
He is not from Pakistan... I think he said in one of his videos that he is an arab
@@مالكالقطيف In the introduction of this video he mentioned Pakistan as his home country when referring to the Bhutto dynasty.
@@مالكالقطيف Hes Pakistani Punjabi (Arain) watch his video on The Useful Charts
@lo l Bhutto Dynasty (Shahnawaz Bhutto Zulfriqar Bhutto Benazir Bhutto)
apostasy law in islam only applies on those Apostates who leave islam openly and becomes political threat only first read context of everything islamophobe
I am kashmiri... And I am really thankful for Hamdani (r.a) for coming to kashmir... otherwise I would be some idol worshipper today....A BIG THANKS TO ALL SUFIS WHO CAME TO KASHMIR
Ya u went from an idol worshipper into a black box worshipper nice!! Keep up the good work.
@@byron-ih2ge happy with worshipping black box. Thank you.
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj you are so happy with your misfortune,keep it up
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj it was your fortune to be a asur and worship the devil😂🤣
@@jijijijijjjiijijijjjjj
Zaleel kashir mlechha bahman converted koum
You talk kashmiri history and not even mention karkota empire the largest empire of kashmir just cause it dont suit your agenda
Its just like talking about Mongolia and not even mentioning Mongol Empire
Thank you brother for the upload.
Thank you for making this video on Kashmir and hats off to your honesty at the end of the video.
FreeKashmir !
Lol...
@ARP yes , the land won't go anywhere (unless the continents shift). We are not talking about land going anywhere but rather we ask for our right to self determination on this land we are native to irrespective of religion. The land is Kashmir and we are called Kashmiris. We speak kashmiri , follow Kashmiri traditions and culture and have roots in this place. India has been largely succesful in portraying our struggle as an "islamic" one and I have to accept we Kashmiris and also Pakistan is largely responsible for that. You might say that kashmiri civlization is an important part of Indian civilization but so are Nepal , Bangladesh , Pakistan. At some point , even south east Asia was an important part of Indian civilization. Are they not separate countries? You never know what will happen in the future. Maybe in the next 200 years we won't get what we want , maybe even in the next 1000 years we won't , maybe in the next 2000 years we won't. We probably won't even exist. And at some point , the Hindu indian civilization didn't even exist (before Proto-Indo-European from central Asia migrated to India) and was a completely different civilation all together. You never know what will happen. Anyways , I just want peace for everyone.
@ARP and to address your forced conversion thing , yes I agree that people forced to convert will eventually return to their roots.
@ARP ok , you should come to Kashmir and talk to the kashmiri Pandits here then. But I don't understand why you will only accept kashmiri Pandit demands? Religious preference? See how religion keeps coming up whenever you talk about Kashmir? This is the problem.
I'm not asking for unification with Pakistan and the establishment of an islamic caliphate in Kashmir. I'm asking for an independent Kashmir with Kashmiris living in peace irrespective of religion. Infact not even an independent Kashmir. First , we just want a plebiscite with all Kashmiris irrespective of religion getting a chance to decide their own fate.
When most kashmiri muslims asked for freedom from both India , a Hindu majority state and Pakistan , a Muslim majority state , kashmiri Pandits living in India find comfort in India's Hindu majority and want unification with India. So who really is biased here?
And again , if you think kashmiri pandits don't want freedom , I wonder how much you really know about Kashmir from books and not news , social media , etc. Do you know who coined the term "Kashmir for Kashmiris"? It was Prem Nath bazaz , a kashmiri Pandit.
He wrote many books on Kashmir , one of the best being "History of struggle for freedom in Kashmir".
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prem_Nath_Bazaz
Love frm Pakistan . FreeKashmir
I never thought a Pakistani can be so literate and unbiased. Great work man, kudos to you
i nEvEr tHoUgHt a PaKiStAnI cAn bE sO lITeRaTe aNd unBiAsEd.
Glad you realized that you thought wrong
15:00 Kashmir was never given the choice of being independent. Also Pakistan did not invade Kashmir, it were the Muslims of Jammu that rebelled against the maharaja, they wanted to join Pakistan so they started the Azad Kashmir movement which was later on supported by the pashtoons
Ak cheez app na glt boli... Ponch ka Musalmanoo na rebellion start kiya tha aur mera dada ka elder brother b tha un main... Most of them were former British soldiers Jo retire ho chuka tha than Ibrahim Khan Tribal area sa madad mangna GA tha
@Mario Fonseca yes I agree. But there is no reliable proof of the pashtoons plundering the villages.
@@abdulahadkhan557 Yes it was even called the poonch rebellion. But people from mirpur and muzaffarabaad were also involved. Isilye maine jammu Muslims kaha.
@@appeasment1149 bro they were looting villages that is a fact although not in Poonch but in Muzafrabad it is well documented
@Mario Fonseca would you mind linking/suggesting some sources or any authentic accounts so that I can read them and be less misinformed?
Excellent video - any chance you'd be willing to do an expanded version of this video? SO much great content and it moves very quickly.
Yeah, I'll be doing a video on the Sultanate of Kashmir.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Make video on Karkota Empire
@@AlMuqaddimahYTwhere is it😭😭😭
Thank you for putting up a timeline. I suggest to make it more pronounced. It really helps to put things into perspective.
For correct history of Kashmir listen to the lectures by Sushil Pandit (who is a Kashmiri Pandit) videos. Also video of Pushpendra Kulshrstra.
F0R c0rReCt hIsToRy.
And why should we listen to an upper caste Hindu when casteism is such a stain on humanity? Imagine believing you sre superior because of birth right. Lmfao.
Right 👍
There is History from point of view of different People.There is no such thing as correct history.
Hey, You mentioned Kashmir's King Joined India despite having a majority Muslim population. You forget the mention that the Hindu King of Hindu majority Amarkot joined Pakistan, the Muslim King of Kapurthala still chose to join India. This should be enough to prove the fact that Kingdom's decision to pick countries was not based on religion rather politics.
Amarkot not a princely state and kapurthala was ruled by a Sikh. First get your facts right before commenting.
Also, Hyderabad and Junagadh joined Pakistan but India still invaded them and massacred its Muslims.
Great work man,
Just one thing, should have added the Simla convention (McMahon line agreement) too in the end
Hey!
@Abdullah Daniyal tell discord name pls
When you try to do documentary type videos but have a clear bias, they feel more like propaganda
This is probably the most unbiased one. This guy isn’t an apologetic nor is he hindutva
Zain ul abideen was no different from his father. He actually had a health issue which couldn't get treated by the hakeems and was on death bed, so one of his ministers told him about Shri Bhatta a Kashmiri Brahmin who could cure him. The soldiers were sent to jungle to find him since Kashmiri Hindus had fled due to religious persecution. It was after his successful treatment that Zain ul Abideen became benevolent towards Kashmiri Brahmins and when he asked Shri Bhatta what does he want as a reward, he asked for resettlement of Kashmiri Brahmins. After that he got named as Budshah.
"He was no different from his father" *proceeds to explain how, actually, he was different from his father*
I am really impressed. U used the term rishis propagating non idol worships too.. some may disagree but Hinduism has never been idol centric only. It has many system of faiths. Shivaism was importantly partly nonidiolatory (nirakar). Hinduism has never mentioned any specific system it has included all the systems of worship. The region of Tibet and Himalayas has influence of worship through meditation since ancient times by rishis.
Looks like you are there. Enlighten me - who did sthapana for Linga in Rameshwaram 😂.
Let's just not forget that this tolerant muslims caused the 8 exodus of Kashmiri pundits/Brahmans
You didn't talk about kashmiri pandits
How they were massacred in Kashmir?
Great video mate 🙌🏾
This is quite brilliant. Thank you.
Well done this is Interesting. Another great and well-explained video.
Hats off to our ancestors they really faught to save Hinduism.
@Gaytanity 638 ironic, your religion speaks for violence and betrayal, whatever happened with kashmiri pandits was inhumane. And Hinduism is evil?? Such hypocrisy.
Don't you fuckin delete my comment again, shows you are afraid of truth.
But majority of us Pakistanis are now muslims and proud of it
But majority of us are now muslims and proud of it
@nick p they are suffering not in vain, they will be rewarded by Allah tenfolds and the tyrants will be crushed
@nick p but still we pakistanis r satisfied from our religion i think u r not satisfied with your beliefs thats why always showed your frustration in front of us
Great series. I hope you would do Indonesia and Malaysia too someday
Why you ignore shivaite and buddhist history of kashmir
Pakistan did not simply invade Kashmir. The Maharajah initiated massacres against the Muslim populace which ignited a domestic Muslim uprising against his rule. Read
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Poonch_rebellion
After the Partition of India, during October-November 1947 in the Jammu region of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, many Muslims were massacred and others driven away to West Punjab. The killings were carried out by the forces of Maharaja Hari Singh.
It is after the pakistan invaded in 22 October 1947 and massacre happened because 80% troops (mainly muslims) of maharaja hari singh joined hands with Pakistani tribals. He therefore in order to revenge against muslims did massacre.
(In Poonch uprising no massacre is noted by any historians).
He was indeed a foolish ruler. 👍
@Great Deception which kashmiri attacked indian army in 1947? Lol
All the Kashmiris supported indian army against Pakistani tribals. Take your history lessons properly. And jammu Massacre was done by Hari singh not Indian army.
Pakistan invaded the Kingdom, Maharaja reached to India for help - in lieu that if they protect them then they will cede their land
When I first saw arabic(Muslim)name of the channel i thought great another Islamist extremist will try to subvert the real history and portrait Hindus a villains but I got to say he did a good job and told for most part real history without any biases.thank u for that.
Thanks, Lana. Big fan of your work.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT ur welcome it's always a pleasure to find my fans randomly.
@@clashoflands glad tiding to a hindu extremist. bye.
@@azmolhossain9244 ok jihadi
WE WANT FREEDOM!
There is 5000 years of Hindu history on that land
@@kakalimukherjee3297 but who asked?
@@abrarahmed5632
Who asked you if you want freedom or not? We will not let our history be obliterated
@@kakalimukherjee3297 ok boomer....go milk your cows or worship them or something...go peasant
@@abrarahmed5632 yes we want independent Balochistan 🙂
6:44 till now you said very less Muslim population, can you please explain from where the population came into the first place along with the ruler no, because as per your statement no conversion in public were made, can you explain how a flourish shavism was prosecuted by Islam Biased
Really informative video, thank you for this content my fellow Muslim friend :D
Kingdom of egypt ...
@@blacksheep6174 That's correct
@@yousefshahin2654 france fk Islam
@@daredevil5977 That applies to you not Islam my friend 😃😊
th-cam.com/video/i84veBrTiA8/w-d-xo.html
@@yousefshahin2654 which is true cuz I am a French catholic mate 😊 and I hate your poor religion
Bro you have good videos but just to be without music they will much better
Interesting topic thanks for sharing your knowledge keep up the hard work and keep researching bro.
Kashmir should be independent country. Not to Pakistan, India or China.
Wow... I solved the whole issues.
*angry Indian, Pakistani, Chinese noise*
If it becomes an independent country it will be another syria
Naive, the moment it becomes independent - It will be swallowed by China
You should have mentioned that dogra actually purchased kashmir from British for 80 lakhs because British couldn't control it. Their rule was never legitimate. If by any chance anyone things their rule was legitimate than that makes the British occupation of India also legitimate. So since British rule was illegal this only implies that their sale of kashmir was also illegal.
That lie only sunny makkar believe
By your logic , Ottoman sultan bought the church of Hagia Sophia and converted it onto mosque was never legitimate as well. According to your logic Converting Hagia Sophia into mosque is illegal.
Is this what you mean ??
@@T90sGamer Actually, Christian Europe had attacked Muslims first, but Muslim Ottomans fought back and overcame them. So they justly won the land. Jews and Arian Christians were happy because they were no longer persecuted by Trinitarian Christians.
@@zoybean no its the jihad of islam which attack other countries not christans or hindus you attack other civilization and other reacts we hindus lose but christans wins thats how world works , british save hindus from cruel muslim rule and make muslisms powerless and thanks jinnah to take out muslims out of india and make india a hindu majority country.
@@VishalThakur-mb5gi Lol British Christians looted $45 trillion from India, while Mughal rule led India to be more prosperous even than China. Look at the Hindu called Vijay Prashad, he talks about this too even though he is Hindu.
Was forced conversions common around this time?
Not under all Rulers(Those who were influenced more by Sufism)
But extremely and brutal under some Rulers(those who were like modern day Wahabis)
@Sports Entertainment
Wahabis never really had any strong Foothold in kashmir ??
Wahhabism didn't existed back then .
I was talking about Rulers who were like modern day Wahabis .
In general,
Hindus were kind of fine among Sufis and shias .
@Sports Entertainment
Sufism itself is like an umbrella term in a Point of view,
I am not denying that Some or maybe many Sufis were hard toward Hindus politically and Religiously .
But in broad scene with Comparison to mainstream fundamentalist interpretation of Islam ,
Sufis and Shias were Doing fine with Hindus and Buddhists with respect to their differences .
Sheikh ul alam one of the prominent reshi of kashmir ...mentioned in his sufism that none cross questioned him y to accept islam ...
Sufis have greater part in conversions... Conqerers had mostly agenda to attain power rather than islam.
Subscribed already from Kashmir 👍
00:22, the Hindu ruler sided with India because the Pakistanis invaded Kashmir. If Pakistan had been more patient they could have had the whole of Kashmir to themselves !
Watch the video till the end before commenting lmao
He mentions it
@@rohandutta9986 how many people watch till the end compared to the first 30 seconds.
I wrote this comment at 00:30, but didn't change it for the reasons above.