Mine, at nearly 20 years of age, has just crapped its brake ABS and booster system. The back axle and various bits are now getting pretty rusty too. Do I spend nearly £4k UK on the brake repair on a vehicle worth about £4k after its been repaired? That's the type of question you have to ask yourself when running something luxury and big long term.
yeah even at 86 grand its not terrible if you look at the fact itll prolly out live you. but honestly, hes right about their should be a utilitarian version. idgaf about fancy interior shit, i just want a badass offroader with a V8 that i can drive forever. my biggest issue with the 4runner is their isnt a V8 offered
dr. breen's beard good news is toyota said they are going away with the luxury and focusing on the roots of the land cruiser and gonna focus on it being off road specific for the 300. Can’t wait for the new 4runner, land cruiser, tundra, Sequoia.
@@dr._breens_beard lc is sold in toy's major markets as GX/205; totally stripped down versions with a diesel. Its just EU and US where only the LUX/LUX+ with this ridiculous price tags are shipped to, unfortunately. Also, there is a much preferred 4.5 200 kW diesel version everywhere else but EU and US. Has to do with emissions regulations. Toyota could be no longer bothered with the EU emissions nonsense so they stopped bringing LC200 overall (emissions fleets average numbers). I think that LC100 was still the best of luxury/reliability worlds, but 200 is very nicer. I am getting mine next week :-)
My mom bought a 2005 Land Cruiser brand new, fully loaded, and she still has it to this day, 15 years later, driving it every day. 270,000 miles on tue clock. I learned to drive on that car, I’ve taken it all across California and parts of Nevada and Arizona, taken it off reading on hunting trips with my dad out in the Mojave desert. I just love that car so much.
The Land Cruiser is designed more for Stealth Wealth buyers who will keep this car for very long times (the average owner keeps this truck longer than other models) the resale value supports this as well
Right my uncle is a millionaire many times over and drives a land cruiser and suburban. Hes a crab tho 😂 biggest penny pincher ive ever seen. But hes filthy rich bc of it 😂
As an owner of a 2016 Land Cruiser with over 30k miles on it, I’ll try and address some of your concerns as well as the commenters’. 1. Gas mileage. Yes it’s poor, but I’m honestly not sure what you were doing to get it down to 13mpg as you report. The only time I see it that low is if I am towing. Even if I drive it like I stole it, I can’t get mine to average below 14mpg over the course of a tank. If there is no headwind and I drive it conservatively on the highway, 20mpg is realistic and 18-19 is typical. If you go a bit faster and keep up with traffic I’ll get around 17mpg. Around town in traffic I average about 15mpg for daily driving. This is not a problem for me in a daily driver. I actually consider it good gas mileage in a daily driver truck since I’m used to driving trucks most of my life. A truck with nearly 400ho that can easily average 15mpg city is impressive to me compared to vehicles of ten years ago. Much of this is due to weight, but also to relatively rugged and bulletproof engine design. No direct injection. No turbos. Capable of running on poor quality gas around the world, or in certain parts of the US. This is part of the appeal. My biggest complaints regarding gas mileage is that the truck is very sensitive to headwinds, and the tank is only 23 gallons, which limits range to around 400 miles (plus the fuel gauge is very conservative and reads empty with about 3 gallons left). 2. Why this vs a 4Runner? Honestly the 4Runner is a great vehicle, but it’s not quite as good as the Land Cruiser. The LC is much nicer inside, rides better, is much roomier, looks better since the 2016 update, and has a better engine with comparable gas mileage in real world driving. The third row is a little better, but it’s still not meant for adults. Plus even though her 4Runner is pretty reliable, it doesn’t hold a candle to the Land Cruiser. Toyota puts their heart and soul into this flagship vehicle. It, more than any other, is a showcase for the world of what Toyota’s values are. The only other Toyota that comes close is the Lexus GX, which is sold as a Land Cruiser everywhere else in the world. Both are made in Toyota’s best plant in Japan with the best record for reliability, and they take extra care in building these. This is why even though Land Cruisers don’t sell well in the US, you constantly see them in the roads and highways. They just keep going and going for hundreds of thousands of miles. If you get a new vehicle every 4 years it’s not for you. If you buy one to keep for 20 years, you can’t beat them. 3. Price - Yes, $86k is a lot of money, but not as much as it used to be. Look around and it’s easy to find these selling for $79k or less new on the lot. They’re slow sellers. Then compare to a top trim level Yukon or Suburban and realize those also sell for over $80k today, and this has a nicer interior than those. It is close to the interior of the Escalade, and better in many ways. The Lexus LX is even nicer. For what it is, it is competitive in this high end of the market. The one fly in the ointment is the new Nissan Armada. It has a nice interior comparable to, possibly nicer than, the Land Cruiser in the Nissan’s higher trim levels but costs tens of thousands less. It also has more room and is based on an established and fairly reliable platform used elsewhere in the world as the only direct competitor to the Land Cruiser, the Nissan Patrol. The American version is not as off road capable, but it’s not bad at all and better than any domestic in the category. You can get a nice one for about $56k (and similar power and gas mileage) and pocket the rest. Still, though, if you’re after reliability and off road prowess the Land Cruiser can’t be beat.
This x100. Nissan Armada is a fine choice if one cannot afford a LC. That said, Nissan's infotainment is much worse than LC. Like you mentioned LC has better off-road capability and will hold value better too, there are some used armadas for sale less than a year old with low mileage for ~$35k. Yes, the cost savings could be significant, but I really do think the LC is worth the extra money. It's kind of like comparing the Sequoia to the LC, there are a multitude of reasons why there's such a price difference. I'm biased though -- I have been in love with love land cruisers for years, and have never been fan of the Nissan brand in general.
Nice comments about the LC and I'm glad you mentioned the 4Runner in comparison. I own a 2008 LC and a 2005 4Runner and I can say without a doubt that I like my 4Runner much better for off roading. The LC is heavy, doesn't maneuver well in tight situations, feels top heavy and leans more than my 4Runner, is wider, I don't believe the LC has more ground clearance, and actually has less cargo space because of the third row seats. I know I can take the seats out, but what a pain to take them out and then put them back in all of the time. My LC does feel more roomy, seems to have a more comfortable ride on the pavement, and does burn more fuel than my 4Runner. Eventhough my 4Runner is a better off road vehicle for me, I still keep my LC because I like it. It has some cool factor about it that is difficult to explain. Anyway, that's just my opinion and I'm not an expert with Toyotas. I feel like I got more bang for the buck with my 4Runner over my LC.
At the end of the day though, this is my absolute favorite modern SUV. Everything about it just works. It's functional, relatively powerful, and highly versatile. Much of what people complain about in these vehicles (lack of technology, features, dated materials and design) are exactly why I love these things - they're inherently simple and straightforward. They're reliable to a fault, and darn near perfect if you just want something that will last and last.
I can attest to that. I happen to move around countries where roads don't exist, and the Land Cruiser and its little brother,, the Hilux, seem to be favourites. Land Cruiser is an absolute beast crossing a country -- gets a lot of respect, too. Even the UN uses them in Africa. Toyota have it figured out when it comes to usable, reliable cars. Major components of the Land Cruiser come with a 20+ year warranty!
I totally agree , I love them for the very reason people criticise them, old school buttons and everything just works like charm, and things that don't brake down easily, I love this car ,I can't wait to own one
That's the most overused cliche on the planet almost. I've owned three Range Rovers, two Discovery and three Defenders, one Defender 110 for 22 years, plus two Land Cruisers, the current one for nearly 20 years, and the only one of them that has ever let me down and needed to be trucked home was an 80 Series Land Cruiser. My current Land Cruiser has been reliable throughout until a few weeks ago when the brake system ABS and booster failed. It is currently out of service while I decide whether spending £4000 including parts, labour and fluid is worth it on a car that is of this age.
From an African in Botswana.....our government here only buys the 70 and 200 series landcruise and they last for years and require little maintenance. The only government official whose driven in a Range Rover is the The President.
Your experience is by far the exception to the norm. I am happy that you had a pleasant experience with the LR products. I have owned 4 RR , one disco and one 110 . only the disco worked well the rest were unreliable .
I disagree! He provided comedic value which, as someone who has suffered from depression, I find probably more valuable than most. Laughter is said to be the best medicine :P
I just bought one ('17) for $50k (USD). Only 55k miles. The Toyota dealership had been sitting on it for a while. I can't believe I bought my dream car.
In the middle east, this truck comes with variation that is more than insurance packages.. Here in Saudi Arabia we have the following: 4.0L v6 with 5sp manual or 6sp auto 4.6L v8 with 6sp auto 4.5L twin turbo v8 disel with 6sp auto And the 5.7L v8 with 8sp auto It starts from around $45k to around $88k for the VX-S model which has a little more than the US-spec Land Cruiser. They offer variations with a spare tire mounted on the back on its own mount and a winch. They are the definition of 4x4 in Saudi Arabia. By the way, the interior is one of the best interiors that hold up to the extreme use. No noises or squeaks even after 150k+ miles on these. They are that good, but goodness comes with a price :/ On a side note, we don't get the 4runner anymore :(. I wish we could have the 4runner trd pro instead of the fj cruiser (yes, they still make it for the middle east).
Mark Blythne, I hope you are rustproofing it because a Sequoia with an odometer in KMs is probably being driven on salt strewn Canadian roads. Am I right?
Just ran across this since it's a couple of years old, but for the most part a good review, a few bones to pick since I've driven mine for over a week. As the owner of a 2019 LC, I drive mine 40 miles each way to work everyday and average 17 mpg, still not great, but damn that engine rocks! Almost the same gas mileage as my 2002 limited 4Runner that was 18 mpg with an under powered six cylinder, but not quite as good as the other seven 4th and 5th generation limited 4Runners that we've owned over the years which were around 20 mpg. That being said, the LC does have some quirks as all do, but the center stack is one of the best I've seen and the luxury for an actual body on frame 4wd SUV is unmatched. Sitting in the back seat is like sitting in your couch at home. The reason most people buy the LC over the the other "SUV's/Crossovers" is that we can actually take our vehicles off road. The LC provides probably most most off road capable vehicle off of the shelf of any vehicle out there other than maybe the Raptor. But the LC will last 25 years and is actually reliable. The LC is an Icon.
alexander1485 They're pretty reliable... but not like this. The Land Cruiser is so reliable that the Al Qaeda uses it in high temperature deserts. In dusty, sandy, dry salt bed terrain with obviously little to no maintenance (Since I don't think there are Toyota service centers around war zones.) against mil spec hummers with a fleet of technicians that take care of them at HQ.
The not offered in USA anymore Mitsubishi Montero is another competitor....I have the last year in USA 2006. It is built like a tank and they commonly run to 250-300k miles without major repair. Like the Toyota, the interior could be better.
Nice review, I just got my 2019 three weeks ago and love it. You comments about the brakes are spot on 👍. Still trying to get used to them. Gas mileage does suck, but my wife and I Have been driving under powered 4Runners since 2002 and I will take the power and torque for 5 mpg less. Good job, thanks.
A buddy of mine has a '94 land-cruiser in which he has done 480,000 km with no significant issues. He intends to keep it until he drops figuring that's going to happen before the LC dies.
The jump seats are the best! There is no vehicle I’d rather have at any price point than the LC; 911 targa 4 gts is 2nd 😀. And the affordable option for the LC is a 4Runner. Fuel economy could be better but it is what it is in the US. Other countries have the diesel as an option. This vehicle will last you a lifetime without issue. So is it better to have a fail proof ride or better fuel economy? No suburban, Tahoe, Escalade, Navigator, Jeep, etc., can say that. Good review. Thanks.
Maybe I'm too poor to understand, but why would you spend 85 thousand dollars and then take this thing off road where it will be scratched, beaten, and rolled. If you end up taking a machine like this into the apocalypse, it'll be because the original owner was eaten by their own zombie children.
I bought a 100 series, the model prior to the above 200 series, new in 1998. So it will be twenty in six month's time and still drives nearly like new. In the UK we had the hydraulically assisted 'active skyhook' suspension on most models sold, which was only available on the Lexus in the USA I believe. Until last month, and in nearly 200,000 hard farm and towing miles, I had nothing mechanical go wrong. Original exhaust but had an alternator and on its third set of dual batteries. Its a diesel 4.2 litre automatic, four speed. These sold very well in the UK. The 200 series as tested, not so much. It just didn't sell and was/Is outclassed by more modern alternatives and is too big and thirsty, even though only diesel's have been sold here for 30 years or more. They have actually stopped importing it for the last five years or so. In the last few weeks my electric brake booster/ABS/master cylinder unit has developed a fault. Parts price only is over £3000UK. I have to ask myself whether its worth spending that much on a 20 year old car. I'll think about it over my Christmas turkey.
Not too many at breakers. Most old ones seem to end their life in Africa and since the brake unit failure is very common, I suspect that any used ones for sale might have the same issue. How could I tell?
They need a Diesel for worldwide markets that can meet California emission standards. I have spent a lot of time in the UK but most people on this continent would be shocked by the Diesel soot of Europe.
What soot? All diesel cars and trucks made from about 2007 have DPF soot filters and gas engines now produce as much soot as diesel ones. There are old Diesel engines in use of course but my 1998 200,000 mile LC does not create any visible soot. Not like those massive American long-nose trucks. For those that doubt me, come visit Europe. It's not far.
If I remember correctly diesels have significantly higher amounts of very fine particulate matter (PM2.5) that is not caught by the filters, and significantly more NOx emissions as well
Great review - especially under the hoist. I’d like to see more reviewers do the same. Here in Oz (the KDSS was designed here in Western Australia) we get the 200 series in higher and lower specs with the twin turbo V8 diesel across the range. It’s a torque monster with relatively good efficiency and a great touring range from the 140L tank. Barely anybody here buys the petrol model.
I also thought that the coolbox in the center console was kind of silly. But then we took our Landcruiser on a 6,500 mile road trip this summer. That coolbox was awesome. We always had cold bottles of water available. No need for a cooler or ice in the back. The Landcruiser is great for what it is. It is a very comfortable road trip machine. I took it off road in Colorado, up steep, rocky trails crossing 12,000’ passes. No, it isn’t a Wrangler, but within the limits of its geometry, it is quite capable off road. That said, this is a 6,000 lb, body-on-frame, solid-rear-axle truck. It isn’t a crossover. It handles well, for a truck. It drives well, for a truck. It rides well, for a truck. But you will never mistake it for a car. You are not going to get to a favorite off-ramp and decide to blast around it at speed. If you don’t take it off road or tow, then you might be better served by a crossover or minivan.
I love this car. It feels like you are driving an elephant (solid) that is wearing roller skates (nimble). It handles beautifully. Thanks for a great review.
Thank you, I care about fuel efficiency, whether I can afford to waste gas or not. I chose a 2017 Lexus ES 300h and I'm super happy with the legit 40 mpg. If someone "needs" (to whatever degree) a car like this, that's different. But too many people where I live drive these *enormous* gas-guzzlers with ONE person, running errands, 99% of the time. Simply an amazing vehicle, but overkill for most people.
I have a v8 landcruiser 2008 and absolutely love it, yes its a bit thirsty but boy it's worth it, I think it will outlive me. 15years old and drives like new.
The big negative of the fuel economy isn’t a factor at all for someone that can afford a 85k vehicle. People buy this for its legendary reliability & performance.
I'm pretty much at the point where I wouldn't want to take a serious look at a car until I've seen one of your reviews on it. Seriously, thanks, this is the best car review channel on TH-cam. Even the reviews on cars I have no interest in are entertaining and informative.
Twin turbo v8 diesel version is alot more economical and is the big seller here is Australia. But much agreed about the petrol version. Very thirsty. Good review though. Cheers.
Great review video. Spot on commentary and thoughts. Really well done. I own a 2014 LC, bought it new and currently have 62k miles on it and LOVE IT, but it's not for everyone. As you say, if you're staying on the pavement and/or not towing there's likely a better choice for you. The gas mileage really is bad. But if you can get over that, it's a special special vehicle. I regularly load my wife, 2 kids and dog in it and tow a 27' 5,000 lb travel trailer all over the western U.S. and have spent a lot of time off pavement. Aside from swapping out the original tires for BFG KO2's it has no other upgrades and it has no problem pulling that trailer, it's calm at highway speeds (even when pulling the trailer) and is truly special off pavement. After 3 years and 62k pretty hard miles, other than the routine maintenance, it has required exactly 1 repair; passenger door lock actuator failed. I blame the Death Valley wash board for that one! I'm driving this one until the wheels fall off and assuming Toyota doesn't mess too much with the design, will be buying another one. Love, love, love it!
In my country its used by businessmen and politicians to go to office and send their kids to school and literally nothing else, and it also costs 400,000$ for the 4.6L Diesels
Jorge Cano lol most of the shit hole countries have cars 3x the value of America... Dollar to dollar... Because of import tariffs. Trump isn't wrong when he says other counties charge 300% on a vehicle.
emotionscomeandgo they charge more, but not 300% besides, maybe you meant United States of America and not “America” Lol. America is a continent! Are you still going to school? Is it a public school? Lol
One of the reasons this vehicle is 85,000. is because it's assembled in Japan, NOT USA. The import taxes into the U.S. alone make up for high sticker price. If you're looking for longevity, and trouble free, this truck won't fail you.
Ireneus Justin Policarp but would you want to pay huge extra money because of the discounting cash flow ? Because remember the company has to increase the amount for such long term financing because of the time value of money. 80,000 USD after 25 years might worth less than 40,000 USD in todays money.
I totally agree with your assessment of Land Cruiser; it is not a large family road trip suv and it built for off road. I just got the heritage edition for its reliability and off road trips and camping. As a solo hiker, it is a perfect suv for me and I do not careful RV either. LC gives me a freedom to go all over the country including Alaska and to Canada to see the Arctic Ocean😅
Totally agree, they need a $55k utility version of it. The only thing it has over a 4Runner to me is the V8 and if I needed that so badly for towing, I'd be in a 350/3500 series something. Hell a Nissan NV3500 van at what $40k would do that all day long.
I wonder if you will act like the stinger was brought down from heaven on the wings of angels like every other reviewer that has giggled like a horny school girl after driving it. Geez its like Kia paid them to wet themselves with excitement because they all praise the same things.
flipfloplogic lol okayyyy, I guess if every reviewer loves it, and it doesn't align with your views they most all be biased Kia fanboys or be paid by Kia right?
Trenton Oliver 2013 is a good year, Toyota was able to get the quirks out of the initial 200 series and it got a bit of a face lift as well. I'm personally not a fan of the new front design on the 2016-18 model. I got mine CPO with 41k miles. Its so smooth and refined, driving experience is unreal (unless you want to throw it into curves). Curious, how do you like your 100 series? I was debating between a 60-70k mile 2006-07 100 series... what are the differences in the drive?
In Australia we get one with a 4.5L twin Turbo Diesel- Noone buys petrol (gas) versions here, You can also get diferent trim levels- You're driving the "Sahara" (top of the line) version which retails for about 130K AU. The bottom of the range GX is about 80K but it's really basic.
I actually think the fuel economy is ok for what it is. I have a 200 series , a Tundra, a Cummins 2500, a sienna and an es350. My 200 series is averaging 16 a tank I live in the country. But considering it is heavier than the Tundra and full time 4wd i think its pretty good i get 14 in my Tundra 15 in Cummins. 28 in es350 and 22 in Siena.
I too have a Drake II and it is rare to find someone else who does too. I'm not impressed by it too much. The flappers leak too often even after replacing. Should have designed the drain opening better. On the upside, when fully pressing down the flush lever it will produce a forceful push enough to flush a grapefruit or raincoat.
When we were in Tokyo a few years back we made a point to visit the main Toto showroom and visitor center. It's like a Tokyo motor show for bathroom technology.
My father got his Land Cruiser in 1978, when i was 5. I've had one ever since i could afford one in 1999. Ive never bothered with any other car, except Hilux which i called junior 😅 Hilux was cheaper to run in my mining days, really deep and rough so not worried about paint etc I know about fuel etc so i got a 4.5l turbo diesel 😊😊😊😊 There's nothing better, i never regret a day.
I think the Sequoia is the car that should be the one you’re looking for at the end but isn’t quite there. With 80% of the features/towing/off-road (doesn’t a 1st gen share its drivetrain with a 100LC?) for 50% of the price while being a bit bigger for the 3rd row it brings the price down and is more useful as a family hauler but keeps the low MPGs and adds quality issues. Hopefully a 3rd gen could fix some of the quality issues and “add” some lightness or something to fix the mileage.
The only people who would criticise the LC200 Sahara are those who are jealous and can't afford one. Yes, they are a bit thirsty but if fuel is an issue go buy a mid-range ute. I hate to hear people whinging about money. If you can't afford something, go do something about it until you don't have to whinge any more! The LC200 Sahara is the best 4WD on the planet.
Disclaimer: not an engineer. If they updated some of the steel structure to aluminum, I’m assuming that would boost the mpg and improve handling, braking. If they can get mpg to low 20s on highway (without an electric motor/hybridization), that would justify the current pricing more (if they could keep it near current price). Just don’t change the looks, Toyota! I’m not a fan of all the plastic panels and geometric fascias (sp?) on the latest “SUVs” that can’t leave pavement. This definitely has old-school charm.
Getting back to the brakes. They were the same on my FJ Cruiser. Once in a while they would just go full power for no apparent reason. So I went back to the manual and found out they have an emergency braking system that depends on the speed you depress the pedal. If you apply the brakes normally, you can keep raising the pressure to the max and they will perform normally. But, if at any time you depress the brake pedal quickly, it's interpreted as an emergency and they go full power even if you don't apply much pressure. It's the speed the pedal moves and not the pressure applied. Once I understood this, it became a non issue. It didn't help that my previous Chev. pickup was the total opposite. You could stab the brake pedal with all your might and it would take a second to start braking. In fact a quick kick of the pedal didn't do anything. After years of pre-braking the Chev it took me a while to relearn to apply the brakes more smoothly in the Toyota.
I don't mean to sound like an arrogant international, but the fuel economy in the 4.5 V8 turbo diesel is pretty great by US standards. If only you could get it there.
My mom daily drives a 100-series with a lift. 230k miles and only the fuel pump and the starter have gone out. Take care of them, they take care of you.
I have to agree on the running boards being on the narrow side but still not a big problem. I do, however, slipped because of it while adjusting the middle seats. It left me with a gashes on both my shins. Ow.
As I was watching this I wondered why you did not mention the Diesel or even the cars being offered by the competition. But I was glad to here your views on fuel economy and the purchase price. Funny that you voiced what was going through my head as I was watching your video, with a more basic and much cheaper version. It seems that Toyota is trying to pitch this as a luxury vehicle and charging the hugh price of something like a Range Rover, for example, yet cannot compare and should not compare to those luxury brands. Maybe the Lexus is a better comparison, but it is only a few grand more than the Toyota. Toyota should not loose focus on it's identity/reputation (of the Land Cruiser) which has been built over many decades. There is no scenario where I could accept that terrible fuel efficency, nor the sky high purchase price. Sorry Toyota.
The Tundra in a crew cab version has the same engine / transmission I think, but at much lower cost. But with similar reliability / towing / hauling etc
if someone ever told me to pick a car that youll have to use the rest of your life.. this would be it..
Mine, at nearly 20 years of age, has just crapped its brake ABS and booster system. The back axle and various bits are now getting pretty rusty too. Do I spend nearly £4k UK on the brake repair on a vehicle worth about £4k after its been repaired? That's the type of question you have to ask yourself when running something luxury and big long term.
Fadic4 thank you
yeah even at 86 grand its not terrible if you look at the fact itll prolly out live you. but honestly, hes right about their should be a utilitarian version. idgaf about fancy interior shit, i just want a badass offroader with a V8 that i can drive forever. my biggest issue with the 4runner is their isnt a V8 offered
dr. breen's beard good news is toyota said they are going away with the luxury and focusing on the roots of the land cruiser and gonna focus on it being off road specific for the 300. Can’t wait for the new 4runner, land cruiser, tundra, Sequoia.
@@dr._breens_beard lc is sold in toy's major markets as GX/205; totally stripped down versions with a diesel. Its just EU and US where only the LUX/LUX+ with this ridiculous price tags are shipped to, unfortunately. Also, there is a much preferred 4.5 200 kW diesel version everywhere else but EU and US. Has to do with emissions regulations. Toyota could be no longer bothered with the EU emissions nonsense so they stopped bringing LC200 overall (emissions fleets average numbers). I think that LC100 was still the best of luxury/reliability worlds, but 200 is very nicer. I am getting mine next week :-)
My mom bought a 2005 Land Cruiser brand new, fully loaded, and she still has it to this day, 15 years later, driving it every day. 270,000 miles on tue clock. I learned to drive on that car, I’ve taken it all across California and parts of Nevada and Arizona, taken it off reading on hunting trips with my dad out in the Mojave desert. I just love that car so much.
The Land Cruiser is designed more for Stealth Wealth buyers who will keep this car for very long times (the average owner keeps this truck longer than other models) the resale value supports this as well
Tony Oliver
Like the VW Pheaton!
Thats true in the US but not so much in other countries.
True especially here in the middle east.
Right my uncle is a millionaire many times over and drives a land cruiser and suburban. Hes a crab tho 😂 biggest penny pincher ive ever seen. But hes filthy rich bc of it 😂
Yeah, it's a shame we don't have many Stealth Wealth vehicles. This and the Kia K900 are the only ones we really have.
As an owner of a 2016 Land Cruiser with over 30k miles on it, I’ll try and address some of your concerns as well as the commenters’.
1. Gas mileage. Yes it’s poor, but I’m honestly not sure what you were doing to get it down to 13mpg as you report. The only time I see it that low is if I am towing. Even if I drive it like I stole it, I can’t get mine to average below 14mpg over the course of a tank. If there is no headwind and I drive it conservatively on the highway, 20mpg is realistic and 18-19 is typical. If you go a bit faster and keep up with traffic I’ll get around 17mpg. Around town in traffic I average about 15mpg for daily driving. This is not a problem for me in a daily driver. I actually consider it good gas mileage in a daily driver truck since I’m used to driving trucks most of my life. A truck with nearly 400ho that can easily average 15mpg city is impressive to me compared to vehicles of ten years ago. Much of this is due to weight, but also to relatively rugged and bulletproof engine design. No direct injection. No turbos. Capable of running on poor quality gas around the world, or in certain parts of the US. This is part of the appeal.
My biggest complaints regarding gas mileage is that the truck is very sensitive to headwinds, and the tank is only 23 gallons, which limits range to around 400 miles (plus the fuel gauge is very conservative and reads empty with about 3 gallons left).
2. Why this vs a 4Runner? Honestly the 4Runner is a great vehicle, but it’s not quite as good as the Land Cruiser. The LC is much nicer inside, rides better, is much roomier, looks better since the 2016 update, and has a better engine with comparable gas mileage in real world driving. The third row is a little better, but it’s still not meant for adults. Plus even though her 4Runner is pretty reliable, it doesn’t hold a candle to the Land Cruiser. Toyota puts their heart and soul into this flagship vehicle. It, more than any other, is a showcase for the world of what Toyota’s values are. The only other Toyota that comes close is the Lexus GX, which is sold as a Land Cruiser everywhere else in the world. Both are made in Toyota’s best plant in Japan with the best record for reliability, and they take extra care in building these. This is why even though Land Cruisers don’t sell well in the US, you constantly see them in the roads and highways. They just keep going and going for hundreds of thousands of miles. If you get a new vehicle every 4 years it’s not for you. If you buy one to keep for 20 years, you can’t beat them.
3. Price - Yes, $86k is a lot of money, but not as much as it used to be. Look around and it’s easy to find these selling for $79k or less new on the lot. They’re slow sellers. Then compare to a top trim level Yukon or Suburban and realize those also sell for over $80k today, and this has a nicer interior than those. It is close to the interior of the Escalade, and better in many ways. The Lexus LX is even nicer. For what it is, it is competitive in this high end of the market.
The one fly in the ointment is the new Nissan Armada. It has a nice interior comparable to, possibly nicer than, the Land Cruiser in the Nissan’s higher trim levels but costs tens of thousands less. It also has more room and is based on an established and fairly reliable platform used elsewhere in the world as the only direct competitor to the Land Cruiser, the Nissan Patrol. The American version is not as off road capable, but it’s not bad at all and better than any domestic in the category. You can get a nice one for about $56k (and similar power and gas mileage) and pocket the rest. Still, though, if you’re after reliability and off road prowess the Land Cruiser can’t be beat.
Brian Mooney I like your review better than this video itself!
This x100. Nissan Armada is a fine choice if one cannot afford a LC. That said, Nissan's infotainment is much worse than LC. Like you mentioned LC has better off-road capability and will hold value better too, there are some used armadas for sale less than a year old with low mileage for ~$35k. Yes, the cost savings could be significant, but I really do think the LC is worth the extra money. It's kind of like comparing the Sequoia to the LC, there are a multitude of reasons why there's such a price difference. I'm biased though -- I have been in love with love land cruisers for years, and have never been fan of the Nissan brand in general.
You should start your own channel. I enjoyed reading your impression of the Land Cruiser.
Nice comments about the LC and I'm glad you mentioned the 4Runner in comparison. I own a 2008 LC and a 2005 4Runner and I can say without a doubt that I like my 4Runner much better for off roading. The LC is heavy, doesn't maneuver well in tight situations, feels top heavy and leans more than my 4Runner, is wider, I don't believe the LC has more ground clearance, and actually has less cargo space because of the third row seats. I know I can take the seats out, but what a pain to take them out and then put them back in all of the time. My LC does feel more roomy, seems to have a more comfortable ride on the pavement, and does burn more fuel than my 4Runner. Eventhough my 4Runner is a better off road vehicle for me, I still keep my LC because I like it. It has some cool factor about it that is difficult to explain. Anyway, that's just my opinion and I'm not an expert with Toyotas. I feel like I got more bang for the buck with my 4Runner over my LC.
The 4Runner is also made at the Tahara factory where the LC200 and GX are made.
At the end of the day though, this is my absolute favorite modern SUV. Everything about it just works. It's functional, relatively powerful, and highly versatile. Much of what people complain about in these vehicles (lack of technology, features, dated materials and design) are exactly why I love these things - they're inherently simple and straightforward. They're reliable to a fault, and darn near perfect if you just want something that will last and last.
I can attest to that. I happen to move around countries where roads don't exist, and the Land Cruiser and its little brother,, the Hilux, seem to be favourites. Land Cruiser is an absolute beast crossing a country -- gets a lot of respect, too. Even the UN uses them in Africa. Toyota have it figured out when it comes to usable, reliable cars. Major components of the Land Cruiser come with a 20+ year warranty!
I totally agree , I love them for the very reason people criticise them, old school buttons and everything just works like charm, and things that don't brake down easily, I love this car ,I can't wait to own one
Range Rover is the car when you want to take into deep Africa, The Land Cruiser is the car that will get you back.
That's the most overused cliche on the planet almost. I've owned three Range Rovers, two Discovery and three Defenders, one Defender 110 for 22 years, plus two Land Cruisers, the current one for nearly 20 years, and the only one of them that has ever let me down and needed to be trucked home was an 80 Series Land Cruiser. My current Land Cruiser has been reliable throughout until a few weeks ago when the brake system ABS and booster failed. It is currently out of service while I decide whether spending £4000 including parts, labour and fluid is worth it on a car that is of this age.
Huw Williams how long did you own each vehicle exactly?
From an African in Botswana.....our government here only buys the 70 and 200 series landcruise and they last for years and require little maintenance. The only government official whose driven in a Range Rover is the The President.
abs really as far as i remember it didnt have a abs only japanese one did not the overseas model
Your experience is by far the exception to the norm. I am happy that you had a pleasant experience with the LR products. I have owned 4 RR , one disco and one 110 . only the disco worked well the rest were unreliable .
Turbowski provided absolutely zero value to this channel, yet somehow there is something missing without him!
+paul dewar Agreed
paul dewar ive been crying from sadness
I disagree! He provided comedic value which, as someone who has suffered from depression, I find probably more valuable than most. Laughter is said to be the best medicine :P
I just bought one ('17) for $50k (USD). Only 55k miles. The Toyota dealership had been sitting on it for a while. I can't believe I bought my dream car.
In the middle east, this truck comes with variation that is more than insurance packages..
Here in Saudi Arabia we have the following:
4.0L v6 with 5sp manual or 6sp auto
4.6L v8 with 6sp auto
4.5L twin turbo v8 disel with 6sp auto
And the 5.7L v8 with 8sp auto
It starts from around $45k to around $88k for the VX-S model which has a little more than the US-spec Land Cruiser. They offer variations with a spare tire mounted on the back on its own mount and a winch. They are the definition of 4x4 in Saudi Arabia.
By the way, the interior is one of the best interiors that hold up to the extreme use. No noises or squeaks even after 150k+ miles on these. They are that good, but goodness comes with a price :/
On a side note, we don't get the 4runner anymore :(. I wish we could have the 4runner trd pro instead of the fj cruiser (yes, they still make it for the middle east).
hisham202 You also have the Land Cruiser Prado and the Fortuner (and the Hiace, etc.,).
What i want an fj cruiser. 😭😭😭
2:16 "like im a gymnast so I do my gymnastics on it"
These things regularly go 600k miles. I have never heard of a Ford, Chevy or Ram accomplishing that.
Doug M. The Ford , Chevy and Ram combined won't last 600K miles.
my 2008 toyota sequoia which i bought brand new, is now 350,000km and still going strong, never broke down.
Mark Blythne, I hope you are rustproofing it because a Sequoia with an odometer in KMs is probably being driven on salt strewn Canadian roads. Am I right?
Guy Proulx, You are correct but it makes even more sense to rustproof a vehicle that is genuinely engineered to last 20+ years.
Guy Proulx, In a TH-cam Comments Section first, we are in complete agreement. BTW I use KROWN for my 12.5 year old utilitarian runabout.
Just ran across this since it's a couple of years old, but for the most part a good review, a few bones to pick since I've driven mine for over a week. As the owner of a 2019 LC, I drive mine 40 miles each way to work everyday and average 17 mpg, still not great, but damn that engine rocks! Almost the same gas mileage as my 2002 limited 4Runner that was 18 mpg with an under powered six cylinder, but not quite as good as the other seven 4th and 5th generation limited 4Runners that we've owned over the years which were around 20 mpg. That being said, the LC does have some quirks as all do, but the center stack is one of the best I've seen and the luxury for an actual body on frame 4wd SUV is unmatched. Sitting in the back seat is like sitting in your couch at home. The reason most people buy the LC over the the other "SUV's/Crossovers" is that we can actually take our vehicles off road. The LC provides probably most most off road capable vehicle off of the shelf of any vehicle out there other than maybe the Raptor. But the LC will last 25 years and is actually reliable. The LC is an Icon.
You guys would love the 4.5 V8 twin turbo diesel we get here in Australia with 650NM of torque stock
It’s a shame it’s not available
Most reliable SUV on the planet. If you have the $$ there is no competition.
Justin S um nissan patrols
alexander1485
They're pretty reliable... but not like this. The Land Cruiser is so reliable that the Al Qaeda uses it in high temperature deserts. In dusty, sandy, dry salt bed terrain with obviously little to no maintenance (Since I don't think there are Toyota service centers around war zones.) against mil spec hummers with a fleet of technicians that take care of them at HQ.
The not offered in USA anymore Mitsubishi Montero is another competitor....I have the last year in USA 2006. It is built like a tank and they commonly run to 250-300k miles without major repair. Like the Toyota, the interior could be better.
J Fazzuoli
That's a shame.. Same thing goes for the Toyota Hilux.
The Montero was expensive to repair when it didi break and the huge V6 was a dog.
Nice review, I just got my 2019 three weeks ago and love it. You comments about the brakes are spot on 👍. Still trying to get used to them. Gas mileage does suck, but my wife and I Have been driving under powered 4Runners since 2002 and I will take the power and torque for 5 mpg less. Good job, thanks.
A buddy of mine has a '94 land-cruiser in which he has done 480,000 km with no significant issues. He intends to keep it until he drops figuring that's going to happen before the LC dies.
The jump seats are the best! There is no vehicle I’d rather have at any price point than the LC; 911 targa 4 gts is 2nd 😀. And the affordable option for the LC is a 4Runner. Fuel economy could be better but it is what it is in the US. Other countries have the diesel as an option. This vehicle will last you a lifetime without issue. So is it better to have a fail proof ride or better fuel economy? No suburban, Tahoe, Escalade, Navigator, Jeep, etc., can say that. Good review. Thanks.
In my country is called Toyota Land Cruiser, but it comes with a V8 twin turbo diesel engine....
SO FUCKING LUCKY!
In my country there's No Land Cruiser. We don't even have the Prado
Best part of the video 2:17. I'm sold.
Maybe I'm too poor to understand, but why would you spend 85 thousand dollars and then take this thing off road where it will be scratched, beaten, and rolled. If you end up taking a machine like this into the apocalypse, it'll be because the original owner was eaten by their own zombie children.
Did Scott divorce you?
Maybe they just filed for separation.
randikalakmal
The gooseman doesnt believe in condoms, so Scott is 9 months preg now. Scott is at home resting.
this sounds like an episode from The Orville
Best truck ever!
Possibly.
@@rightlanehog3151 Best truck ever!
Suv 😂
I drove a 4 Runner Limited. It was like a mini Land Cruiser.
I bought a 100 series, the model prior to the above 200 series, new in 1998. So it will be twenty in six month's time and still drives nearly like new. In the UK we had the hydraulically assisted 'active skyhook' suspension on most models sold, which was only available on the Lexus in the USA I believe. Until last month, and in nearly 200,000 hard farm and towing miles, I had nothing mechanical go wrong. Original exhaust but had an alternator and on its third set of dual batteries. Its a diesel 4.2 litre automatic, four speed.
These sold very well in the UK. The 200 series as tested, not so much. It just didn't sell and was/Is outclassed by more modern alternatives and is too big and thirsty, even though only diesel's have been sold here for 30 years or more. They have actually stopped importing it for the last five years or so.
In the last few weeks my electric brake booster/ABS/master cylinder unit has developed a fault. Parts price only is over £3000UK. I have to ask myself whether its worth spending that much on a 20 year old car. I'll think about it over my Christmas turkey.
Huw Williams Get one from a nice wrecked vehicle/junkyard car. What most of us do.
Not too many at breakers. Most old ones seem to end their life in Africa and since the brake unit failure is very common, I suspect that any used ones for sale might have the same issue. How could I tell?
They need a Diesel for worldwide markets that can meet California emission standards. I have spent a lot of time in the UK but most people on this continent would be shocked by the Diesel soot of Europe.
What soot? All diesel cars and trucks made from about 2007 have DPF soot filters and gas engines now produce as much soot as diesel ones.
There are old Diesel engines in use of course but my 1998 200,000 mile LC does not create any visible soot. Not like those massive American long-nose trucks.
For those that doubt me, come visit Europe. It's not far.
If I remember correctly diesels have significantly higher amounts of very fine particulate matter (PM2.5) that is not caught by the filters, and significantly more NOx emissions as well
Great review - especially under the hoist. I’d like to see more reviewers do the same.
Here in Oz (the KDSS was designed here in Western Australia) we get the 200 series in higher and lower specs with the twin turbo V8 diesel across the range. It’s a torque monster with relatively good efficiency and a great touring range from the 140L tank. Barely anybody here buys the petrol model.
I wish America had the diesel model. The torque and fuel economy are so much better than gasoline.
I also thought that the coolbox in the center console was kind of silly. But then we took our Landcruiser on a 6,500 mile road trip this summer. That coolbox was awesome. We always had cold bottles of water available. No need for a cooler or ice in the back.
The Landcruiser is great for what it is. It is a very comfortable road trip machine. I took it off road in Colorado, up steep, rocky trails crossing 12,000’ passes. No, it isn’t a Wrangler, but within the limits of its geometry, it is quite capable off road.
That said, this is a 6,000 lb, body-on-frame, solid-rear-axle truck. It isn’t a crossover. It handles well, for a truck. It drives well, for a truck. It rides well, for a truck. But you will never mistake it for a car. You are not going to get to a favorite off-ramp and decide to blast around it at speed.
If you don’t take it off road or tow, then you might be better served by a crossover or minivan.
Arguably the best car reviewer on TH-cam. Keep it up!
I love this car. It feels like you are driving an elephant (solid) that is wearing roller skates (nimble). It handles beautifully. Thanks for a great review.
Thank you, I care about fuel efficiency, whether I can afford to waste gas or not. I chose a 2017 Lexus ES 300h and I'm super happy with the legit 40 mpg. If someone "needs" (to whatever degree) a car like this, that's different. But too many people where I live drive these *enormous* gas-guzzlers with ONE person, running errands, 99% of the time. Simply an amazing vehicle, but overkill for most people.
Still would drive it
I have a v8 landcruiser 2008 and absolutely love it, yes its a bit thirsty but boy it's worth it, I think it will outlive me. 15years old and drives like new.
The big negative of the fuel economy isn’t a factor at all for someone that can afford a 85k vehicle. People buy this for its legendary reliability & performance.
Thats why in Latin America nobody buys the Gasoline version, just the Diesel version with more extras for this roads!
85k and the volume knob pops out??
Maxfli82 it’s likely unique to this press car he was testing.
It’s a press car, and was probably used at car shows as well.
I'm pretty much at the point where I wouldn't want to take a serious look at a car until I've seen one of your reviews on it. Seriously, thanks, this is the best car review channel on TH-cam. Even the reviews on cars I have no interest in are entertaining and informative.
LOL!! At 4:24 You're nose is leaking man! Understandable tho because it's Illinois
Thot Patrol spent all his money on the new garage, can't afford tissues lolol
You are nose is leaking man! That's what you wrote.
Twin turbo v8 diesel version is alot more economical and is the big seller here is Australia. But much agreed about the petrol version. Very thirsty. Good review though. Cheers.
I have zero interest in any SUVs but I'm here to support the goose!
Geese unite!
Where can I see your gymnastic performances?
At the Rub n' Tug male exotic dancer club in Atlanta
That's funny right there!
Would still be whining about the negatives. Gush about the positives. Final thoughts overall? Great gymnast.
this is a win in Australia this is what every family dreams of buying
If I run out of time while watching your videos, I leave my computer to play it so you still get a full view count.
Great review video. Spot on commentary and thoughts. Really well done. I own a 2014 LC, bought it new and currently have 62k miles on it and LOVE IT, but it's not for everyone. As you say, if you're staying on the pavement and/or not towing there's likely a better choice for you. The gas mileage really is bad. But if you can get over that, it's a special special vehicle. I regularly load my wife, 2 kids and dog in it and tow a 27' 5,000 lb travel trailer all over the western U.S. and have spent a lot of time off pavement. Aside from swapping out the original tires for BFG KO2's it has no other upgrades and it has no problem pulling that trailer, it's calm at highway speeds (even when pulling the trailer) and is truly special off pavement. After 3 years and 62k pretty hard miles, other than the routine maintenance, it has required exactly 1 repair; passenger door lock actuator failed. I blame the Death Valley wash board for that one! I'm driving this one until the wheels fall off and assuming Toyota doesn't mess too much with the design, will be buying another one. Love, love, love it!
In my country its used by businessmen and politicians to go to office and send their kids to school and literally nothing else, and it also costs 400,000$ for the 4.6L Diesels
Zayan Khan $400,000?? In what shit hole country like mine do you live?
Jorge Cano lmao. A 2018 vxr v8 lc costs 70k here
ahmadclassy and where’s “here”..?
Jorge Cano lol most of the shit hole countries have cars 3x the value of America... Dollar to dollar... Because of import tariffs. Trump isn't wrong when he says other counties charge 300% on a vehicle.
emotionscomeandgo they charge more, but not 300% besides, maybe you meant United States of America and not “America” Lol. America is a continent! Are you still going to school? Is it a public school? Lol
I appreciate you using a stunt double for more dangerous demonstrations
One of the reasons this vehicle is 85,000. is because it's assembled in Japan, NOT USA. The import taxes into the U.S. alone make up for high sticker price. If you're looking for longevity, and trouble free, this truck won't fail you.
thats a very good point.
Still does not justify $85k
LOL! Your comedy comes out of no where and is hysterical. I never see it coming. New sub and making the journey of watching all your vids.
That stripped down version that you're looking for is the 4Runner. My wife and I just bought one and it's way, wayyy better than I expected!
well to be honest dude, these cars just work, reliable and put simply the best work horse you will ever own!
I wish I could afford one. They last forever!
AbsoluteMdot buy used
Ireneus Justin Policarp but would you want to pay huge extra money because of the discounting cash flow ? Because remember the company has to increase the amount for such long term financing because of the time value of money. 80,000 USD after 25 years might worth less than 40,000 USD in todays money.
@@tanvirina hurrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I totally agree with your assessment of Land Cruiser; it is not a large family road trip suv and it built for off road. I just got the heritage edition for its reliability and off road trips and camping. As a solo hiker, it is a perfect suv for me and I do not careful RV either. LC gives me a freedom to go all over the country including Alaska and to Canada to see the Arctic Ocean😅
Totally agree, they need a $55k utility version of it. The only thing it has over a 4Runner to me is the V8 and if I needed that so badly for towing, I'd be in a 350/3500 series something. Hell a Nissan NV3500 van at what $40k would do that all day long.
Olympian gymnast. 2020 here we come!
Those were some serious break dancing moves at the 02:20 videomark. Somebody just got served.
Turbo Diesel V8 will reduce fuel consumption by around 50% over petrol.
Yes but with the new regulations for diesel engines this is not safe to own. The gas engine can be converted to LPG and this solves the problem.
@@Combine1331 If only comments from 2 years ago can evolve with the changing times, I wouldn't need to reply.
4:31 Chubby Escorts Now...you sir, keep us entertained. Well done.
Is the Chubby Escort Service affordable? Asking...for a friend.
Please tell me you're going to do an in-depth Kia Stinger video...
+Will Moon When they supply one you can count on it
I wonder if you will act like the stinger was brought down from heaven on the wings of angels like every other reviewer that has giggled like a horny school girl after driving it. Geez its like Kia paid them to wet themselves with excitement because they all praise the same things.
flipfloplogic lol okayyyy, I guess if every reviewer loves it, and it doesn't align with your views they most all be biased Kia fanboys or be paid by Kia right?
Uh oh, "It's still a Kia" incoming
flipfloplogic ...or maybe it's just a genuinely good car, ever thought of that? 🤔
Mine is 2008 Sahara model. Still enjoy every minute of it.
Do you not get the Twin Turbo Diesel version in the US? That is the one to have, better torque and fuel economy!
Ah, good ol' "Chubby Escorts Now". Definitely a high quality service!
Just bought a 2013 200 series in the same color and it's been a dream to drive... my favorite car of all time!!!
Michael Evangelista its not a car
alexander1485 thanks
If it is motorized human transportation (7 or less), four wheels and a steering wheel, it is a car. :)
I was thinking of buying a 2013, I given a 1999, 10 years ago. It is still incredibly well.
Trenton Oliver 2013 is a good year, Toyota was able to get the quirks out of the initial 200 series and it got a bit of a face lift as well. I'm personally not a fan of the new front design on the 2016-18 model. I got mine CPO with 41k miles. Its so smooth and refined, driving experience is unreal (unless you want to throw it into curves). Curious, how do you like your 100 series? I was debating between a 60-70k mile 2006-07 100 series... what are the differences in the drive?
The 4.5 v8 turbo diesel is the best version of this not available in us though
I don’t understand why your videos don’t get 10x the views.
In Australia we get one with a 4.5L twin Turbo Diesel- Noone buys petrol (gas) versions here, You can also get diferent trim levels- You're driving the "Sahara" (top of the line) version which retails for about 130K AU. The bottom of the range GX is about 80K but it's really basic.
Great review. Thx. Those rear seats suck piles. The single biggest drawback is that the seats don’t fold away into the floor.
🎬100 series vs 200 series compared, Which to buy?: th-cam.com/video/GVy_L7peHK8/w-d-xo.html
I actually think the fuel economy is ok for what it is. I have a 200 series , a Tundra, a Cummins 2500, a sienna and an es350.
My 200 series is averaging 16 a tank I live in the country. But considering it is heavier than the Tundra and full time 4wd i think its pretty good i get 14 in my Tundra 15 in Cummins. 28 in es350 and 22 in Siena.
Where the hell is turbowski!!!
Good choice on the Toto toilet. I’m a Drake II owner checking in.
Totos are the shit
Andrew Nelson that's a good pun.
I too have a Drake II and it is rare to find someone else who does too. I'm not impressed by it too much. The flappers leak too often even after replacing. Should have designed the drain opening better. On the upside, when fully pressing down the flush lever it will produce a forceful push enough to flush a grapefruit or raincoat.
When we were in Tokyo a few years back we made a point to visit the main Toto showroom and visitor center. It's like a Tokyo motor show for bathroom technology.
It's actually listed in the Lonely Planet guide!
There is no cooler videographer out there than you Savagegeese, always waiting and watching your videos even without Scott.
You can get a used certified preowned 4x4 Sequoia with the same v8, same towing, 90% of the off road capabilities, and more interior space for 15k.
90% of the off-road capability?! LMAO, get real man.
After watching The Fast Lane Truck's video and then yours, you shit all over that channel. You actually know what you're talking about. Sub'd.
Best SUV ever created on Planet Earth!
Great review you should work for Toyota as a spokesperson I’ve owned three land cruisers and one newer LX 570 land cruise is better
My father got his Land Cruiser in 1978, when i was 5.
I've had one ever since i could afford one in 1999.
Ive never bothered with any other car, except Hilux which i called junior 😅
Hilux was cheaper to run in my mining days, really deep and rough so not worried about paint etc
I know about fuel etc so i got a 4.5l turbo diesel 😊😊😊😊
There's nothing better, i never regret a day.
I think the Sequoia is the car that should be the one you’re looking for at the end but isn’t quite there. With 80% of the features/towing/off-road (doesn’t a 1st gen share its drivetrain with a 100LC?) for 50% of the price while being a bit bigger for the 3rd row it brings the price down and is more useful as a family hauler but keeps the low MPGs and adds quality issues. Hopefully a 3rd gen could fix some of the quality issues and “add” some lightness or something to fix the mileage.
The rest of the world has the V8 diesel engine option - much better for fuel economy.
The only people who would criticise the LC200 Sahara are those who are jealous and can't afford one. Yes, they are a bit thirsty but if fuel is an issue go buy a mid-range ute. I hate to hear people whinging about money. If you can't afford something, go do something about it until you don't have to whinge any more! The LC200 Sahara is the best 4WD on the planet.
ITS A TANK
With endorsements from both UN and every terrorist organization and the mafia chains on the planet, don't forget this Russian tycoons.
Great review as usual. You look like a mini me version of the michelin man in that coat.
This is king in the South America! But with the v8 diesel of course. Honestly, only Toyota and Nissan can keep up in bush.
The stripped down version at $55K is the 4Runner TRD Pro.
That thing is a lot more truck like
I miss the same sex car reviews
7:56 KDSS* NOT KDDS
5800 lbs plus high revving V8 - you shouldn't be the least bit surprised about the poor fuel economy...
So is Turbowski kinda just hanging out on a cliff, 127 Hoursstyle?
4:30 - Chubby Escorts now... Really my man?
great review man...its a popular choice in my country, Nigeria. pls review the 2019 prado...my dream ride!
Impressive gymnastics routine, wish I could do that!
A wonderful review. Subscribed
Diesel LandCruisers in Australia are much better for economy and of course torque. Legendary vehicles for the harsh outback conditions
Unfortunately they emit vast amounts of toxic pollutants which is totally out of step with modern standards.
Disclaimer: not an engineer. If they updated some of the steel structure to aluminum, I’m assuming that would boost the mpg and improve handling, braking. If they can get mpg to low 20s on highway (without an electric motor/hybridization), that would justify the current pricing more (if they could keep it near current price). Just don’t change the looks, Toyota! I’m not a fan of all the plastic panels and geometric fascias (sp?) on the latest “SUVs” that can’t leave pavement. This definitely has old-school charm.
Getting back to the brakes. They were the same on my FJ Cruiser. Once in a while they would just go full power for no apparent reason. So I went back to the manual and found out they have an emergency braking system that depends on the speed you depress the pedal. If you apply the brakes normally, you can keep raising the pressure to the max and they will perform normally. But, if at any time you depress the brake pedal quickly, it's interpreted as an emergency and they go full power even if you don't apply much pressure. It's the speed the pedal moves and not the pressure applied. Once I understood this, it became a non issue. It didn't help that my previous Chev. pickup was the total opposite. You could stab the brake pedal with all your might and it would take a second to start braking. In fact a quick kick of the pedal didn't do anything. After years of pre-braking the Chev it took me a while to relearn to apply the brakes more smoothly in the Toyota.
I don't mean to sound like an arrogant international, but the fuel economy in the 4.5 V8 turbo diesel is pretty great by US standards. If only you could get it there.
My mom daily drives a 100-series with a lift. 230k miles and only the fuel pump and the starter have gone out. Take care of them, they take care of you.
I have to agree on the running boards being on the narrow side but still not a big problem. I do, however, slipped because of it while adjusting the middle seats. It left me with a gashes on both my shins. Ow.
i wouldnt be too sure about the apocalypse part.
scrapping gas for these things is pretty hard considering its gas mileage
This video just talked me out buying a 100 series Land Cruiser
As I was watching this I wondered why you did not mention the Diesel or even the cars being offered by the competition.
But I was glad to here your views on fuel economy and the purchase price.
Funny that you voiced what was going through my head as I was watching your video, with a more basic and much cheaper version.
It seems that Toyota is trying to pitch this as a luxury vehicle and charging the hugh price of something like a Range Rover, for example, yet cannot compare and should not compare to those luxury brands. Maybe the Lexus is a better comparison, but it is only a few grand more than the Toyota.
Toyota should not loose focus on it's identity/reputation (of the Land Cruiser) which has been built over many decades.
There is no scenario where I could accept that terrible fuel efficency, nor the sky high purchase price.
Sorry Toyota.
The Tundra in a crew cab version has the same engine / transmission I think, but at much lower cost. But with similar reliability / towing / hauling etc
Some of the 4runner models also get the KDSS suspension.