Recently picked up a gfx100s II. I had come from a D850 and transitioned into an R5 and could never get the same quality in color, DR and mood that I got from the Nikon. The GFX is on another level - pics have a perfect sharpness and contrast/color while still keeping natural skin tones. Fuji has awesome color science and the metering and WB is spot on.
Every time a new GFX camera comes out I think, “Wow I’ll probably buy the next one after this, so it can improve a bit more” and never actually do. Seems like it’s getting really close to being an all around hybrid
100% this camera and autofocus but with 50mp sensor would be ideal. 100mp is overkill on most things. Even my m1 ultra Mac Studio shows some slow down with the files.
I had one for a while, but had some issues using autofocus on anything other than still subjects. Still the best photos I have seen, but odd autofocus considering the video autofocus is decent
It’s still going to be slow compared to most full frame cameras out right now. But I also think it depends on the lens. I found the new 55mm was slower than the 32-64mm
Same experience from my very limited exposure to this beast, image quality is absolutely FANTASTIC, but AF/Tracking is still miles behind anything on the market, so Fuji has some more work to do in this area, hope some Firmware upgrade can improve it a bit.
This camera is great with the grip. you can have 3 batteries running at the same time as you can keep the internal one in, and use two external. Liked your review on this, well done, lovely fog shots too - very atmospheric !
You finally got one. Can’t wait to watch this review! Hopefully they sent 110. I know everyone has been testing with 55 because it’s the new lens, but I think best performance would be with 110 because of focus motor.
Nice overview Lee. The images the come from the GFX cameras never cease to amaze me. The detail sharpness is so good yet very natural looking. I always wonder if Fuji will ever be able to create a GFX camera that can compete financially with the FF market. But, not sure they would want to because then they'd be competing with their own APCS flagship cameras too. Thanks again, have a great week.
If they ever did go full frame they would have to build out an entirely new lens ecosystem. Not saying they won’t. But it would take years to get a lens line up compatible to the competition. It’s kind of cool they just went straight to medium format. It’s just tough to justify the price for most people. If they come out with a 50mp version of this camera for like $5000 then I think we have a winner
Man, it'd be a dream if this camera could internally shoot open gate full 16-bit raw video and proxy prores 422 simultaneously. I mean, the cfexpress type b should be able to handle the speed, but I don't know if the processor and heat management could do it.
I just saw another review of this fantastic camera and made some comments there, so I will just do a copy and paste here instead of typing it all over again: A friend of mine just replaced his original GFX100 with the version II, and I have a chance to play with it few weeks ago when we did some shoot out, image quality is as fantastic as expected, the color, the resolution, what's not to like? coming form all kind of high end FF, A7R IV, 7RV, Z9, Z7, 1Dx..... I simply love what this new camera offers. ergonomic is also greatly improved, not a Z9 or R3 kind of comfort, but it's really day and night better than the old model, I found the old GFX 100's vertical grip is juts so horrible. However, even they claimed the AF has significant upgrade, I still feel it way way behind when it comes to shooting anything that moves, the eyes focus is still a hit and miss game, tracking a moving car, bikers, the focus always got confused and jumping around between different target, and more often than not, lost the target at the end. I understand this is by no mean a " sports camera", but I think it's still a little too crazy to have this kind of AF performance out of a camera cost $7500 in 2024. I do like what the camera produces in terms of image quality, just wish they did a little more on the focus system. With that being said, I think I still will add one to my bag, because I have 1Dx and Z9 and tons of super telephoto lenses already for those applications that need the reach and speed. especially now with the new 30mm Tilt Shift lens, it will be perfect for my landscape application, currently have a full set of Canon Tilt Shift lens so I am huge fan of tilt-shift lenses. 30mm MF ( 24mm FF equivalent) is not always wide enough but a good starting point, two more lenses I really want Fuji to produce is the FF 14mm F1.4/1.8 equivalent for my Milky Way shots, and a 24ish mm MF Tilt/Shift equivalent to my Canon 17 TSE, then I will be a happy Fuji GFX shooter.
I have a gfx 100s and my dream camera that I can aford it will be a camera with the spec of gfx 100 ii (the big sensor, 16 bit colour the better autofocus) but with 50mpx and body the kind of the gfx 50r (with the old school dials). I will buy it today price in 4500 range.
I'm with you. I have a 50sII, don't want more Mpx, just want a phase AF, a bit faster camera for street , 16-bit would be awesome (and ideally in the rangefinder design). Problem is there's no new 50mpx BSI stacked sensor which would allow phase AF. And recently sb from Fuji talked about the fact that 50Mpx cameras aren't a priority as that's a standard in Full Frame now so would be hard to market it.
I'm a landscape photographer and I did consider this camera, but I went with the 50 instead and I don't regret my choice. The 50 S2 is the little brother of this camera and it definitely is not in this league but it's still very good. I would edge people if you are looking at getting into GFX cameras. Definitely check out the 50 are the 50 S and the 50 S2 as they are fantastic cameras Honestly if you can't afford this model, then look at one of the lower models as they are also fractionally better in low light because they have less pixels and the GFX lenses are where the juices at people this is where it will make you some money the GFX lenses are expensive, but once you start getting a bit of work with your camera you'll make it. Back is what I say. Thanks for the video dude always love your channel
Counterpoint: I do NOT recommend checking out the 50s ii. I bought and returned it recently - the sensor is really showing its age. Coming from full-frame and iso performance is quite poor from the 50 sensor line. 100s might be worth the extra money
"recorded in 8k" checks TH-cam for 8k 😮 I am impressed you took the time to upload a proper 8k copy 🎉. TH-cam seems to compress the background really badly with some odd crosshatch artifacts but the foreground is stunning in true 8k. Well done ❤.
@@LeeZavitz thanks for the treat though! It is so rare to get 8k content on my 8k monitor. As to the compression it seems TH-cam is less violent with HDR content but getting that uploaded is a totally different story. I have videos languishing for over a week before they will pop in with no communication to you it just happens.
Thanks for your excellent review/intro to this awesome camera, Lee! As I’m a 100% stills photographer, I was wondering how the stills image quality, I. e., sharpness and detail retention compare to, say, the 100% stills camera like the Hasselblad X2D.
Excellent video, Lee! So, if I'm a stills-only photographer wanting the GFX 100 ll, is there a way to turn off all video-related info/graphics/icons showing in the EVF and/or LCD display? Thanks!
I stopped uploading images for people to look at because I found a whole bunch of people stealing calling it their own work and even finding stuff on sites where they were selling it. Obviously the model doesn’t consent to that and got me in trouble. So I stopped doing that and now only show results on TH-cam, instagram and X
So since you’ve shot both this body and the 100S II, and aside being self-described “cheap” (😅), if you hand the money - which camera would you choose? 100II or 100SII? My only issue, having large hands and shooting primarily vertical, is the lack of a grip option for the 100SII. But the 100II also isn’t $2500 more IQ. Def in a quandary between both systems. Your thoughts?
They are both great. I don’t think the extra you pay for the 100II is personally worth it but it does come with a few extra perks. But if you want the vertical power grip I don’t think there is one for the 100sii unfortunately.
11 หลายเดือนก่อน
Its an amazing camera. So easy to edit. Only thing is driving me crazy, the microphone levels not showing up on outside screen. Other than that "I Love It"
I bought the GFX 100s after your last video.... it pushed me over the edge. This seems a correct a few of the annoying elements of the previous......... BUT do I really need to spend £7.5k on another body. No............. maybe one day on the 2nd hand market like I successfully did on the previous model :) Cheers boss
“Better than full frame?” What kind of question is this? It’s more expensive, bulkier, has a larger sensor, who doubts that this will be better than full frame?
Medium format starts at 6x4.5 cm. Large format starts at 4 inches. I think this could be called medium format in the modern era, but definitely not large format.
Sorry but Phase One is not dead. It's highest revenue was last year. It's a totally different market and target user. There's no point using Phase One in the same sentence as GFX and XCD lines.
I’ve owned 3 Phase systems and worked with them for years. They are behind the curve. Their revenue is from subscription based profits through CaptureOne.
I’ve owned 3 phase systems. P65+ P30+ and IQ350 XF. I’ve traveled the world with them and used on countless commercial jobs. The bodies are so sub par. The focusing system even on the XF is a joke. That’s why the commercial crews use Hasselblad bodies with IQ backs. But now with the simplicity and reliability of the GFX system it’s a no brainer. Plus budgets in today’s world make it a rare option we even need medium format when you have cameras like the R5. You’re conflating revenue from Subscription based income via CaptureOne with sales of their camera systems. There’s a big difference. The reign of Phase dominating the medium format market is over. Hasselblad as well…
Excellent review. Looks like a fantastic package, too bad even at this price they refuse to put internal storage into a camera. Everyone needs to follow Hasselblad's lead.
Yeah I’m surprised no manufacture really does it. Another use could be larger buffer writing to super fast 1tb internal storage as it offloads to sd Card in the background
The problem with Fuji is they keep nerfing the AF of their lenses for the GFX. THey are just plain idiots. They improve the AF of the GFX100 ii BUT they opted to use crappy focus motors instead of linear ones for the 55 1.7 and 80 1.7 . It's just plain DUMB. Especially since the older 110mm F2 has fast linear focus. They should just fire everyone or close down. People who buy the GFX would 100% be ok with paying more for better AF with the core lenses. People waited so long for a 55 1.7 and 80 1.7!
Yeah I noticed the 55mm was noisy and choppy, I didn’t have time to make a review on it but I did use it with the camera. they do the same thing with the lenses for the X mount too. Some have linear motors some don’t. The performance is drastically different from lens to lens so it’s hard when reviewing new camera bodies
@@LeeZavitz yeah this is why I left fuji a fee years back. They kept upgrading the XT body AF and I kept buying but bit it took forever to upgrade the 35 1.4 and 56 1.2 AF . Two of most important core lenses for weddings!
I'm not hater against the product itself-in fact, I own the camera gfx100 mk 1 , and it performs well for what it is. However, I strongly disagree with the misleading marketing that labels it as "large format." In the history of photography, "large format" has always referred to much larger sizes, like 4x5, 5x7, or 8x10 inches. By calling this camera "large format," the company is blurring important distinctions that have been well-established in photography for decades. This creates unnecessary confusion for photographers who understand "large format" to mean something very specific. A more accurate term would be "micro medium format" or something similar, which wouldn't be as misleading. It's important to respect the terminology that has been built over 200 years in the photography community. Words like "large format" carry weight and significance, and using them inaccurately undermines that. The camera might be larger than 35mm full-frame, but that doesn't justify calling it something it's not. 4×5 cameras are the definition of old-school photographic technology. They've existed in some form since about the 1830s
@@RBBoston Fujifilm refers to their "GFX" series sensor as "large format" primarily as a marketing strategy. While it's true that the sensor is smaller than traditional medium format film (like 645, which measures about 56mm x 41.5mm), Fujifilm's sensor (43.8mm x 32.9mm) is significantly larger than a full-frame sensor (36mm x 24mm). obviously you know nothing about the "history of photography" nor terms of film camera, move along
Recently picked up a gfx100s II. I had come from a D850 and transitioned into an R5 and could never get the same quality in color, DR and mood that I got from the Nikon. The GFX is on another level - pics have a perfect sharpness and contrast/color while still keeping natural skin tones. Fuji has awesome color science and the metering and WB is spot on.
Every time a new GFX camera comes out I think, “Wow I’ll probably buy the next one after this, so it can improve a bit more” and never actually do. Seems like it’s getting really close to being an all around hybrid
100% this camera and autofocus but with 50mp sensor would be ideal. 100mp is overkill on most things. Even my m1 ultra Mac Studio shows some slow down with the files.
You should tell them that! I want this too :)
i have the same thought, the next one has to be perfect so keeps waiting
I had one for a while, but had some issues using autofocus on anything other than still subjects. Still the best photos I have seen, but odd autofocus considering the video autofocus is decent
It’s still going to be slow compared to most full frame cameras out right now. But I also think it depends on the lens. I found the new 55mm was slower than the 32-64mm
Same experience from my very limited exposure to this beast, image quality is absolutely FANTASTIC, but AF/Tracking is still miles behind anything on the market, so Fuji has some more work to do in this area, hope some Firmware upgrade can improve it a bit.
This camera is great with the grip. you can have 3 batteries running at the same time as you can keep the internal one in, and use two external. Liked your review on this, well done, lovely fog shots too - very atmospheric !
You finally got one. Can’t wait to watch this review! Hopefully they sent 110. I know everyone has been testing with 55 because it’s the new lens, but I think best performance would be with 110 because of focus motor.
I was only sent the 55mm and the 32-64mm
Nice overview Lee. The images the come from the GFX cameras never cease to amaze me. The detail sharpness is so good yet very natural looking. I always wonder if Fuji will ever be able to create a GFX camera that can compete financially with the FF market. But, not sure they would want to because then they'd be competing with their own APCS flagship cameras too. Thanks again, have a great week.
If they ever did go full frame they would have to build out an entirely new lens ecosystem. Not saying they won’t. But it would take years to get a lens line up compatible to the competition. It’s kind of cool they just went straight to medium format. It’s just tough to justify the price for most people. If they come out with a 50mp version of this camera for like $5000 then I think we have a winner
Nice video! This camera is overkill for most people but still an amazing achievement considering the competition has crazy prices.
Totally agree!
I'm renting one from BorrowLenses next week to play with compare with my A7Rii
Nice!
Give us your thoughts!! :)
Man, it'd be a dream if this camera could internally shoot open gate full 16-bit raw video and proxy prores 422 simultaneously. I mean, the cfexpress type b should be able to handle the speed, but I don't know if the processor and heat management could do it.
Hi thank you, I hope in three or four years I will be able to get one i.e. 100S body with adapter, I hope.
Your shots are just amazing! Are you applying a film simulation before your own preset? Or fully raw
I just saw another review of this fantastic camera and made some comments there, so I will just do a copy and paste here instead of typing it all over again:
A friend of mine just replaced his original GFX100 with the version II, and I have a chance to play with it few weeks ago when we did some shoot out, image quality is as fantastic as expected, the color, the resolution, what's not to like? coming form all kind of high end FF, A7R IV, 7RV, Z9, Z7, 1Dx..... I simply love what this new camera offers. ergonomic is also greatly improved, not a Z9 or R3 kind of comfort, but it's really day and night better than the old model, I found the old GFX 100's vertical grip is juts so horrible.
However, even they claimed the AF has significant upgrade, I still feel it way way behind when it comes to shooting anything that moves, the eyes focus is still a hit and miss game, tracking a moving car, bikers, the focus always got confused and jumping around between different target, and more often than not, lost the target at the end. I understand this is by no mean a " sports camera", but I think it's still a little too crazy to have this kind of AF performance out of a camera cost $7500 in 2024. I do like what the camera produces in terms of image quality, just wish they did a little more on the focus system.
With that being said, I think I still will add one to my bag, because I have 1Dx and Z9 and tons of super telephoto lenses already for those applications that need the reach and speed. especially now with the new 30mm Tilt Shift lens, it will be perfect for my landscape application, currently have a full set of Canon Tilt Shift lens so I am huge fan of tilt-shift lenses. 30mm MF ( 24mm FF equivalent) is not always wide enough but a good starting point, two more lenses I really want Fuji to produce is the FF 14mm F1.4/1.8 equivalent for my Milky Way shots, and a 24ish mm MF Tilt/Shift equivalent to my Canon 17 TSE, then I will be a happy Fuji GFX shooter.
I have a gfx 100s and my dream camera that I can aford it will be a camera with the spec of gfx 100 ii (the big sensor, 16 bit colour the better autofocus) but with 50mpx and body the kind of the gfx 50r (with the old school dials). I will buy it today price in 4500 range.
I'm with you. I have a 50sII, don't want more Mpx, just want a phase AF, a bit faster camera for street , 16-bit would be awesome (and ideally in the rangefinder design). Problem is there's no new 50mpx BSI stacked sensor which would allow phase AF. And recently sb from Fuji talked about the fact that 50Mpx cameras aren't a priority as that's a standard in Full Frame now so would be hard to market it.
@@nth_to_see_hereSadellly you are right .
I'm a landscape photographer and I did consider this camera, but I went with the 50 instead and I don't regret my choice. The 50 S2 is the little brother of this camera and it definitely is not in this league but it's still very good. I would edge people if you are looking at getting into GFX cameras. Definitely check out the 50 are the 50 S and the 50 S2 as they are fantastic cameras Honestly if you can't afford this model, then look at one of the lower models as they are also fractionally better in low light because they have less pixels and the GFX lenses are where the juices at people this is where it will make you some money the GFX lenses are expensive, but once you start getting a bit of work with your camera you'll make it. Back is what I say. Thanks for the video dude always love your channel
Counterpoint: I do NOT recommend checking out the 50s ii. I bought and returned it recently - the sensor is really showing its age. Coming from full-frame and iso performance is quite poor from the 50 sensor line. 100s might be worth the extra money
"recorded in 8k" checks TH-cam for 8k 😮 I am impressed you took the time to upload a proper 8k copy 🎉. TH-cam seems to compress the background really badly with some odd crosshatch artifacts but the foreground is stunning in true 8k. Well done ❤.
Yeah TH-cam compression destroys it
@@LeeZavitz thanks for the treat though! It is so rare to get 8k content on my 8k monitor. As to the compression it seems TH-cam is less violent with HDR content but getting that uploaded is a totally different story. I have videos languishing for over a week before they will pop in with no communication to you it just happens.
Thanks for your excellent review/intro to this awesome camera, Lee! As I’m a 100% stills photographer, I was wondering how the stills image quality, I. e., sharpness and detail retention compare to, say, the 100% stills camera like the Hasselblad X2D.
Excellent video, Lee! So, if I'm a stills-only photographer wanting the GFX 100 ll, is there a way to turn off all video-related info/graphics/icons showing in the EVF and/or LCD display? Thanks!
thanks for your review. is there any way to see some of the results from the shoot with the models?
I stopped uploading images for people to look at because I found a whole bunch of people stealing calling it their own work and even finding stuff on sites where they were selling it. Obviously the model doesn’t consent to that and got me in trouble. So I stopped doing that and now only show results on TH-cam, instagram and X
@@LeeZavitz thanks for the quick response. totally understand and nothing you need.
Better than full frame, period, without question mark.
Nice review Lee.
So since you’ve shot both this body and the 100S II, and aside being self-described “cheap” (😅), if you hand the money - which camera would you choose? 100II or 100SII?
My only issue, having large hands and shooting primarily vertical, is the lack of a grip option for the 100SII. But the 100II also isn’t $2500 more IQ. Def in a quandary between both systems.
Your thoughts?
They are both great. I don’t think the extra you pay for the 100II is personally worth it but it does come with a few extra perks. But if you want the vertical power grip I don’t think there is one for the 100sii unfortunately.
Its an amazing camera. So easy to edit. Only thing is driving me crazy, the microphone levels not showing up on outside screen. Other than that "I Love It"
Love that camera
I will eventually trade up from my GFX100s just for the video. if i stayed with just stills, I wouldn't bother.
Yeah videos specs as well as video autofocus is worth the upgrade if you do a lot of video
@@LeeZavitzyeah. Tho I love the glass, Fuji needs to bring out GF glass that can do video aside from the 110 and 45-100mm.
What Fuji tended not to mention was that, if you want to shoot at 8fps, you'll be shooting in 12-bit.
Good overview, maybe future me will rationalize this.
Great job
Will be sick to pick up for $500 in about 8-10 years 😀
Lol exactly!
more like 10-14
I bought the GFX 100s after your last video.... it pushed me over the edge. This seems a correct a few of the annoying elements of the previous......... BUT do I really need to spend £7.5k on another body. No............. maybe one day on the 2nd hand market like I successfully did on the previous model :) Cheers boss
Haha. I will buy one in 6-7 years when it’s only like $2500 used and it will be an insane value
Nice review.
Had no idea you could remove the viewfinder. Why? I know nothing about fuji cameras.
lyou can only do this on the gfx line. But it does make the camera more compact. And there’s also a different evf with a swivel attachment
Dream camera yea
Fantastic
“Better than full frame?” What kind of question is this? It’s more expensive, bulkier, has a larger sensor, who doubts that this will be better than full frame?
All of those things could either make it better or not better.
There are usually at least some more traits to a camera system than ergonomics, sensor size and price to consider..
Lol even Lee had to bring you some common sense
Really depends tbh
@@LeeZavitz no
Cons?
Big and expensive
Thanks for this review
Thanks for watching!
Medium format starts at 6x4.5 cm. Large format starts at 4 inches. I think this could be called medium format in the modern era, but definitely not large format.
Thanks for sharing
Question: medium format is way bigger area than full frame.
In video what does it shoots ?
How dare him say I won’t buy it because it’s expensive…
He’s right tho.
😂
Good video by Patrick Renna
I find it hilarious that, when they made film cameras, they labeled them "Fuji", but when they went to digital, they changed to "Fujifilm"!
I have gained this camera and it’s unreal with stills. I don’t shoot video 😊
I’ve had mine since September. I love it.
Its a solid camera
I’ve had FF, GFX, Film etc. All you need is an XT5 and a newer 1.4.
PhaseOne is dead. Hasselblad Xd is interesting but there’s incompatibility issues with CaptureOne. Fuji has taken the lead.
Sorry but Phase One is not dead. It's highest revenue was last year. It's a totally different market and target user. There's no point using Phase One in the same sentence as GFX and XCD lines.
I’ve owned 3 Phase systems and worked with them for years. They are behind the curve. Their revenue is from subscription based profits through CaptureOne.
I’ve owned 3 phase systems. P65+ P30+ and IQ350 XF. I’ve traveled the world with them and used on countless commercial jobs. The bodies are so sub par. The focusing system even on the XF is a joke. That’s why the commercial crews use Hasselblad bodies with IQ backs. But now with the simplicity and reliability of the GFX system it’s a no brainer. Plus budgets in today’s world make it a rare option we even need medium format when you have cameras like the R5. You’re conflating revenue from Subscription based income via CaptureOne with sales of their camera systems. There’s a big difference. The reign of Phase dominating the medium format market is over. Hasselblad as well…
@@DillonPadgette Fair enough. You're right.
Excellent review. Looks like a fantastic package, too bad even at this price they refuse to put internal storage into a camera. Everyone needs to follow Hasselblad's lead.
Yeah I’m surprised no manufacture really does it. Another use could be larger buffer writing to super fast 1tb internal storage as it offloads to sd Card in the background
It costs around 7,99,990/-
Poor man's Hasselblad.
Fiji is leicas poor men too
The problem with Fuji is they keep nerfing the AF of their lenses for the GFX. THey are just plain idiots. They improve the AF of the GFX100 ii BUT they opted to use crappy focus motors instead of linear ones for the 55 1.7 and 80 1.7 . It's just plain DUMB. Especially since the older 110mm F2 has fast linear focus. They should just fire everyone or close down. People who buy the GFX would 100% be ok with paying more for better AF with the core lenses. People waited so long for a 55 1.7 and 80 1.7!
Yeah I noticed the 55mm was noisy and choppy, I didn’t have time to make a review on it but I did use it with the camera. they do the same thing with the lenses for the X mount too. Some have linear motors some don’t. The performance is drastically different from lens to lens so it’s hard when reviewing new camera bodies
@@LeeZavitz yeah this is why I left fuji a fee years back. They kept upgrading the XT body AF and I kept buying but bit it took forever to upgrade the 35 1.4 and 56 1.2 AF . Two of most important core lenses for weddings!
@@j5daniel182What its the problem with fuji?
I'm not hater against the product itself-in fact, I own the camera gfx100 mk 1 , and it performs well for what it is. However, I strongly disagree with the misleading marketing that labels it as "large format." In the history of photography, "large format" has always referred to much larger sizes, like 4x5, 5x7, or 8x10 inches.
By calling this camera "large format," the company is blurring important distinctions that have been well-established in photography for decades. This creates unnecessary confusion for photographers who understand "large format" to mean something very specific. A more accurate term would be "micro medium format" or something similar, which wouldn't be as misleading.
It's important to respect the terminology that has been built over 200 years in the photography community. Words like "large format" carry weight and significance, and using them inaccurately undermines that. The camera might be larger than 35mm full-frame, but that doesn't justify calling it something it's not. 4×5 cameras are the definition of old-school photographic technology. They've existed in some form since about the 1830s
that's just not true, in terms of the "history of photography"
@@RBBoston Fujifilm refers to their "GFX" series sensor as "large format" primarily as a marketing strategy. While it's true that the sensor is smaller than traditional medium format film (like 645, which measures about 56mm x 41.5mm), Fujifilm's sensor (43.8mm x 32.9mm) is significantly larger than a full-frame sensor (36mm x 24mm).
obviously you know nothing about the "history of photography" nor terms of film camera, move along