Back in the days of newsgroups about 20 years ago Jason Gastrick used to pray for one atheist each day on the alt.atheism group. He was going through the a.a list numbers.
I didn't know that. I'm going to be posting this video on my main channel today because the weirdo isn't responding to my emails. He's doubling down on trying to get this audio deleted from the internet. He can fuck right off.
Thank you. The Streisand effect and Joel Michael Singer. Joel is a guy who was taken to the ground after headbutting somebody. Joel spent a bunch of money trying to get the video taken off the internet until someone finally made a website joelmichaelsinger.com showing the video dead center. It's now gone but it was up for a while and people still talk about what a piece of crap the guy is: web.archive.org/web/20220314221536/joelmichaelsinger.com/
I have never heared of you or any other party that is part of this video. At the time of me wathing, this video has 157 views and 10 upvotes. For some reason this video just ended up being on my TH-cam home page. Now... when do people finally get it that the internet never forgets and if you try to make it forget, the oppsite happens? Seriously, if that guy didnt try to get this video/mp3 deleted, I probably would have never come across it. Now I will contribute by liking and commenting. The internet never forgets.
Same here. The video was just suddenly in my feed yesterday, but I didn't watch it, and then again today. I guess the Internet is trying to prove a point.
Don't worry, you've made your point - google is replete with references to it - just a pile of views and adverts that someone other than youtube will get. Good!
Some of my attribution music videos have been up for years. Only to be copy striked years later (Because the artist sees that the song has become popular over the years.) It can be tough out there.
It might be his voice, but the challenge is for him to prove he owns the copyright of the podcast. Check if it's still accessible where you got it from, or if that site has/had any copyright info in regards to the podcasts.
It's not even a podcast. It was a telephone recording of him and Dan Barker in the early 2000s. It was then freely distributed everywhere. There is no where else to get this. It was never for sale because it was the early 2000s before stupid cell phones and ebegging. It'd be like copyrighting a geocities or angelfire website from the 90s/2000s. It's absurd.
I did. Twice. But youtube is unconvinced I have a good reason to have it on my channel. TH-cam is really, really stupid and I have no respect for this crapcan website.
@@Painbow9553 That sucks. At least you can turn it around on this Jason Gastrich guy and bring 1000x more attention on the interview than it ever had before.
There are some pretty good atheist vs religious debates you can find on youtube. Christopher Hitchens. Dan Barker. Richard Dawkins etc. Well, this one is Dan Barker taking on a random Christian fundamentalist named Jason Gastrich. In mine (and other people's opinion), Dan absolutely destroyed Jason in this debate. It's actually a really entertaining listen for anybody questioning their faith, and I think it's an important piece of history in the context of enlightenment and rational thought seekers on the internet. My suspicion of why he wants it removed is probably because Jason is no longer a believer (his own words), but also because he was beat pretty badly in this audio. It was pretty rare and I wanted people to hear it so I put it on youtube.
It IS copyrighted. You don't need to file to have a copyright. And copyright lasts a lot longer than 21 years. And it doesn't matter how long you've had a copy in your possession. That doesn't transfer ownership of the work itself to you; that's crazy. But I would ask to whom the copyright actually belongs. Just because this Jason guy is in it, doesn't mean he owns it. You need to track down who recorded it and published it, and if it's somebody else, they likely can intervene and claim ownership and get Jason's strike taken down.
I suspect Gastrich regrets taking that beating from Barker. Soon after, he recorded a sort of "do over" where he attempts to answer 30 of Barker's questions in the debate, that he didn't really have much of an answer for at the time.
@@Grinder2112oh interesting - I never heard that. I think Jason has since lost his faith but that doesn't mean this debate audio won't be useful to people on either side.
I will concede this Jason guy is likely a douche, but much of what you shouted out here in anger is irrelevant and just plain wrong in terms of how copyright works, and worse, you're calling out methods of IP theft as if their existence validates your stance, which is a horrible, fallacious argument for an atheist (presumably a rationalist) to take. This work IS copyrighted, since you don't need to file with the government to have copyright over a work. Somebody, somewhere, owns this. PERIOD. Copyright lasts a lot longer than 21 years. And it doesn't matter how long you've had a copy in your possession. That doesn't transfer ownership of the work itself to you; that's crazy. But I would ask to whom the copyright ACTUALLY belongs. Just because this Jason guy is in it, doesn't mean he owns it. You need to track down who recorded it and published it (you said you remember downloading it, but you don't know from where: FIND OUT FROM WHERE), and if it's somebody else who published it, they likely can intervene and claim ownership and get Jason's strike taken down. Until you do, TH-cam's Terms of Service allow Jason to be a douche. And screaming about how people trade files on the internet regardless of copyright law, is not going to move TH-cam one iota. The best you can hope for in the meantime, is to claim fair use, and you need to follow those guidelines to do so.
I think only the owner of the copyright can file under the DMCA. If Gastrich owns it, then he can file for it's removal. It doesn't matter if he's in it, he or his agent must have recorded it. You can then critique the audio and upload it in your own video and claim fair use as long as you follow the guidelines.
If jeremy here grows a pair and hops in my voice chat with me, and we both record it, and we both put it on our youtube channels, can we both copyright strike each other? Who owns it then? Come ON. That's pretty much what happened with the Gastrich/Barker interview. There were TWO people in it and it was recorded intentionally to disseminate freely on the internet - not to make a profit and certainly not to try to remove its existence 21 years later. If that's the case, youtube might as well not exist since we can just copyright everything we ever uploaded. Get REAL. It's insanity to think that way.
It was an open debate. From 21 years before. Dunno how long uploaded. Coming after it is ridiculous. Copyright-striking a small youtuber is also ridiculous. With that effort why not just ask to take it down for F sake?
@@AmityvilleFan I was willing to talk to him about it but he's ignoring my emails. He's just being petty it seems. If I were to really get wild I could re-encode the audio and reupload it with several accounts and he can spend days trying to copyright strike all of them.
Just because he appears in it doesn't mean he owns the copyright. He agreed to appear on the show; the producers hold the copyright.
It was just a 1 on 1 telephone call. There was no "show."
Back in the days of newsgroups about 20 years ago Jason Gastrick used to pray for one atheist each day on the alt.atheism group. He was going through the a.a list numbers.
I didn't know that. I'm going to be posting this video on my main channel today because the weirdo isn't responding to my emails. He's doubling down on trying to get this audio deleted from the internet. He can fuck right off.
Holy shit, I am listening to this now. No wonder he took it down. Dan absolutely obliterates him in this debate.
Something about B. Streisand effect. I've no idea how this video ended up on my feed, but glad it did.
Thank you. The Streisand effect and Joel Michael Singer. Joel is a guy who was taken to the ground after headbutting somebody. Joel spent a bunch of money trying to get the video taken off the internet until someone finally made a website joelmichaelsinger.com showing the video dead center. It's now gone but it was up for a while and people still talk about what a piece of crap the guy is:
web.archive.org/web/20220314221536/joelmichaelsinger.com/
I have never heared of you or any other party that is part of this video.
At the time of me wathing, this video has 157 views and 10 upvotes.
For some reason this video just ended up being on my TH-cam home page.
Now... when do people finally get it that the internet never forgets and if you try to make it forget, the oppsite happens?
Seriously, if that guy didnt try to get this video/mp3 deleted, I probably would have never come across it.
Now I will contribute by liking and commenting.
The internet never forgets.
Same here. The video was just suddenly in my feed yesterday, but I didn't watch it, and then again today. I guess the Internet is trying to prove a point.
Ditto.
Happy Streisand effect, Jason!
Don't worry, you've made your point - google is replete with references to it - just a pile of views and adverts that someone other than youtube will get. Good!
i LOVE your attitude n this. reminds me of me. :) youve earned a sub brother!!!!
Thank you, now I have it too.
I'm going to make it my mission to distribute it/make it publicly accessible.
The internet shall not forget 😁
Some of my attribution music videos have been up for years. Only to be copy striked years later (Because the artist sees that the song has become popular over the years.)
It can be tough out there.
You should cut all of Jayyson's audio and replace it with a mechancial sounding ai - He evidently did not do so well in the debate.
Copyright is a gold idea on paper but doesnt work in practice
It works. Copyright doesn't work on TH-cam. It works in most other fields just fine. TH-cam is just garbage.
It might be his voice, but the challenge is for him to prove he owns the copyright of the podcast. Check if it's still accessible where you got it from, or if that site has/had any copyright info in regards to the podcasts.
It's not even a podcast. It was a telephone recording of him and Dan Barker in the early 2000s. It was then freely distributed everywhere. There is no where else to get this. It was never for sale because it was the early 2000s before stupid cell phones and ebegging.
It'd be like copyrighting a geocities or angelfire website from the 90s/2000s. It's absurd.
Go to that video's settings in your account and dispute the claim. He will have to prove to YT that he owns the content.
I have heard that disputing the claim doesn't really do anything because TH-cam pretty much always sides with the alleged copyright holder.
@@colinmckay3175 That's not what I've heard, only that it used to be the case until lots of bad actors started making false claims.
I did. Twice. But youtube is unconvinced I have a good reason to have it on my channel. TH-cam is really, really stupid and I have no respect for this crapcan website.
@@Painbow9553 That sucks. At least you can turn it around on this Jason Gastrich guy and bring 1000x more attention on the interview than it ever had before.
public domain he has no power. also do not agree with your views am a Christian, but still on your side of this bullshit.
Thank you.
so does he own the copyright on this file? for a strike he has to levally stand by this. but i don't know if you have the money to fight it.
Law don't go round here, law dog. Savvy?™
Why is the recording so important and why is he trying to get it copyrighted??
There are some pretty good atheist vs religious debates you can find on youtube. Christopher Hitchens. Dan Barker. Richard Dawkins etc. Well, this one is Dan Barker taking on a random Christian fundamentalist named Jason Gastrich.
In mine (and other people's opinion), Dan absolutely destroyed Jason in this debate.
It's actually a really entertaining listen for anybody questioning their faith, and I think it's an important piece of history in the context of enlightenment and rational thought seekers on the internet.
My suspicion of why he wants it removed is probably because Jason is no longer a believer (his own words), but also because he was beat pretty badly in this audio. It was pretty rare and I wanted people to hear it so I put it on youtube.
It IS copyrighted. You don't need to file to have a copyright. And copyright lasts a lot longer than 21 years. And it doesn't matter how long you've had a copy in your possession. That doesn't transfer ownership of the work itself to you; that's crazy. But I would ask to whom the copyright actually belongs. Just because this Jason guy is in it, doesn't mean he owns it. You need to track down who recorded it and published it, and if it's somebody else, they likely can intervene and claim ownership and get Jason's strike taken down.
@@jeremysmetana8583 Oh, so you're trying to piss me off, huh? I want to talk to you in voice right now. caterwaul.chickenkiller.com/nirv
I suspect Gastrich regrets taking that beating from Barker. Soon after, he recorded a sort of "do over" where he attempts to answer 30 of Barker's questions in the debate, that he didn't really have much of an answer for at the time.
@@Grinder2112oh interesting - I never heard that. I think Jason has since lost his faith but that doesn't mean this debate audio won't be useful to people on either side.
Neeto
I will concede this Jason guy is likely a douche, but much of what you shouted out here in anger is irrelevant and just plain wrong in terms of how copyright works, and worse, you're calling out methods of IP theft as if their existence validates your stance, which is a horrible, fallacious argument for an atheist (presumably a rationalist) to take. This work IS copyrighted, since you don't need to file with the government to have copyright over a work. Somebody, somewhere, owns this. PERIOD. Copyright lasts a lot longer than 21 years. And it doesn't matter how long you've had a copy in your possession. That doesn't transfer ownership of the work itself to you; that's crazy. But I would ask to whom the copyright ACTUALLY belongs. Just because this Jason guy is in it, doesn't mean he owns it. You need to track down who recorded it and published it (you said you remember downloading it, but you don't know from where: FIND OUT FROM WHERE), and if it's somebody else who published it, they likely can intervene and claim ownership and get Jason's strike taken down. Until you do, TH-cam's Terms of Service allow Jason to be a douche. And screaming about how people trade files on the internet regardless of copyright law, is not going to move TH-cam one iota. The best you can hope for in the meantime, is to claim fair use, and you need to follow those guidelines to do so.
Nope. It's time for voice chat. caterwaul.chickenkiller.com/nirv
I think only the owner of the copyright can file under the DMCA. If Gastrich owns it, then he can file for it's removal. It doesn't matter if he's in it, he or his agent must have recorded it. You can then critique the audio and upload it in your own video and claim fair use as long as you follow the guidelines.
If jeremy here grows a pair and hops in my voice chat with me, and we both record it, and we both put it on our youtube channels, can we both copyright strike each other? Who owns it then? Come ON.
That's pretty much what happened with the Gastrich/Barker interview. There were TWO people in it and it was recorded intentionally to disseminate freely on the internet - not to make a profit and certainly not to try to remove its existence 21 years later.
If that's the case, youtube might as well not exist since we can just copyright everything we ever uploaded. Get REAL. It's insanity to think that way.
It was an open debate. From 21 years before. Dunno how long uploaded.
Coming after it is ridiculous.
Copyright-striking a small youtuber is also ridiculous. With that effort why not just ask to take it down for F sake?
@@AmityvilleFan I was willing to talk to him about it but he's ignoring my emails. He's just being petty it seems.
If I were to really get wild I could re-encode the audio and reupload it with several accounts and he can spend days trying to copyright strike all of them.