Now I understand why being an RPG gamer at my teenage helped me not Just scaping reality, for inability to Deal with my emotions, but also for understanding all of this, and How much ancient texts relate so well ...when you walk knowing this is a dream in Consciousness is easier and funnier to live fully in the now, and fully in love with everything that surrounds you...it's a game
Still not sure how VR solves the double slit observer paradox. There were results (interference pattern) without observer also. Can it be that some basic processes always trigger, like a timed function, but without all parameters in place the function spits out the interference pattern??
The act of observation includes an interaction, which collapses the state. If you observe them before they enter, the wave function collapses and the probability amplitude only originates from one of the slits, so there is no interference and no pattern. If it is not observed, the single photon's probability amplitude originates from both slits, interferes with itself, and causes a pattern. And to be extremely clear: The act of observation means there is an interaction with the photon, the effect of this interaction is amplified through the physical apparatus you use to measure it, until you are producing a measurement for a macroscopic variable. The act of observing an object means you have to probe it in some way. There's some information you are extracting from it, whatever mediator for this is used required it to interact with what's under observation. When you take a picture, the light interacts with the object and then the camera interacts with that light. If light just passed through the object, unaffected, nothing would show up on the camera classic example would be the Stern-Gerlach experiments with the behavior of spin-1/2 particles
Is there a tree? A forest? An avatar? Oxygen? A brain inside your head? Nothing needs to be rendered untill the system is called apon to do so. Consciousness is fundamental and outside the system? A digital probabilistic system means to me that there's no tree..and no forest? Your thoughts.
@@waynerichardson1051 "Nothing needs to be rendered untill the system is called apon to do so" Called by who? Bacteria? You? Rocks? ATOMS? i think you have a bad case of making arbitrarly distinction of what "conciousness" or what a "player" is, this is purely arbitrary segregations made by the logical brain. there is no seperation, and so no arbitrary distinction is made as to what to "render" because ALL things are conciousness, one piece of conciousness does not get more or less "rendered" the world is always there because its always observed by itself.
I've been following and observing you for about a year now, and just waiting until you realize that your research is proving that we have a creator. Well done. We may not agree on everything but you have great research never ever touched upon by other research. Still waiting for the lab results.
@Jason Ski - I’m not sure what realization you are waiting for on his part...he has stated over and over again that the LCS (Larger Consciousness System) is God if you want to call it that. He will never use the religious terminology that you want him to as all of that is contaminated (your God is not the same as mine and all the belief differences, etc., etc.). Nor should he use such terminology since it all has a bias. He’s bigger picture...showing that we ALL come from the SAME source. You can call it whatever you want...but until everyone gets away from their personal beliefs and can see a bigger picture, the world will remain in the state it is. All beliefs block larger insight as Tom states...no matter what those beliefs are. The “Creator” is not an anthropomorphic creator with some rule book telling you that you have to do this and that and the other or you are condemned. He is showing that is infantile. The “Creator”, the LCS, is ALL there is. There IS nothing else. Everything that is, in physical or non-physical realities is all a part of the LCS including you and I. There is nothing outside of this. If there actually is something outside of the LCS...i.e. questioning if the LCS is part of something larger, you can never know that as it will all be speculation. It can’t be more than that. If you are within a system, there is no way for you to see outside that system when you are a part of it. All you can do is speculate. The thing that makes you think that you are a separate entity is actually an unparalleled gift: free will. It is this mechanism that allows you to “separate” from the LCS and make choices about what you want to do and learn and what you want to experience and where you want to go to do it. Without free will, you would just remain part of the LCS without any separate beingness or experience.
@@Hermetic7 Thank you for your comments. You helped clarify some things. Although I understand and agree with most of what you said, there are a couple things that I believe logic and science do tell a different story. But I'll save that for a later time.
@@Hermetic7 Scientific evidence which directly contradict evo theory. Scientific evidence that directly supports creation in accordance with the biblical record, Noah's flood, and past water canopy which was 95% bigger than our current atmosphere. It served as a radiation shield, which explains why people lived much longer before the flood. After the water, from within (proven), and the water in the canopy was let out to cause a worldwide flood, records show that average lifespans changed downward. Before the flood, the water canopy not only served as a radiation shield, but also explains why there were tropical forests at the poles. The common misconception, is that according to the disproven Evo theory, people say this happened over millions of years. Total hogwash. The mammoths which were frozen, still had food in their upper digestive system, when they were suddenly killed by sudden temp changes and floods. Plants were frozen. Bugs were frozen. Every mountain on this planet, is covered in aquatic fossils, but these fossils are stacked with and mixed with the entire "million year old" evo timetable of animals, as well as current day animal fossils, and floating log, plant, and vegetation debris, with animals showing signs of sudden catastrophic death with flood like aftermath burials. This is found in every country in every location, including the grand canyon. So, that's what I meant by science and logic. In just one small miniscule aspect of scientific evidence, which I barely touched on, it is clear that the biblical record deems greater respect than some "scientists" are giving it.
@@Hermetic7 and let me know what you think, as well. I love discussion on this matter, with people who show genuine interest. Hopefully, we will remain as unbiased as we can, and remove our emotions from the discussion. And that's what I feel you've done. You've clearly tried to help me better understand your viewpoint and my misconceptions, in a logical and scientific manner. Thank you.
Nothing mystifying about “action at a distance”. Because the universe is a pixelated virtual reality it’s the same as a TV screen. There’s 50 inches across yet the pixels fire at exactly the same time, no matter the distance, as from the tube it’s the same distance to anywhere on that screen.
Hi Tom... What about the coherency of the history of the interactions of the generated parts of space with already existing parts of space? If the LCS, say, generates a galaxy where nobody has ever looked at, this galaxy should have millions of civilisations with a complex history which would have probably interacted with already existing civilisations. The only problem is that they never did, because they never existed before being observed and generated. The LCS should generate a galaxy with civilisations that have never interacted with other existing civilisations. This would be highly improbable, though. Would the LCS just generate galaxies that have been isolated ever since?
No LCS generated spacetime exists or may exist other than in potentia if not "inhabited" by conscious entities. This universe exists only as data streamed to the conscious entities logged on to this PMR "game" from "consciousness space" We are not here, we exist in and as consciousness experiencing the fully immersive illusion of being here.
@@crangonvulgaris9820 the universe seems teeming with all sorts of intelligent life though, and most of them seem to have broken the barrier of the speed of light thanks to tech that interfaces with consciousness. Hell, we are monkeys genetically modified by the Elohim. We always had contact and we always will.
The LCS generates nothing more than what that specific telescope sees, i.e., after drawing one of the possibilities, it puts the appropriate color and intensity on each pixel of the telescopes viewscreen.
@@twcjr44 thanks for answering. So this means that if we went there we wouldn't find civilisations? Or we would, as soon as they would be generated when we, as observers, take a look there? Wait, this implies that this would be a civilisation of NPCs without a consciousness that observes. Are we doomed to find only deserted worlds with NPC critters in this reality? Your hypothesis of a reality made just for us (with the occasional hyperdimensional interaction from other civilisations from other reality frames), using consciousness as a common ground, makes more sense if this is so.
@@YouNolf If there are conscious entities/beings there in our universe, then they would be receiving their own data stream. They wouldn't be NPC's, they are also consciousness having a physical experience just as you are. Their reality is also being generated such as our is, but you don't need that data about their reality until you observe their realty. Until then, the exist only as probability to you. Same concept as person you have never met who is taking a walk in the woods somewhere, those woods don't exist in your data stream, but that doens't means it doesn't exist in other peoples data stream.
What is Tom's thoughts in AI? If a system is built that is non organic and capable of learning and self modifying, would it eventually have a consciousness? The materialist in me says Yes! With sufficient complexity will come self awareness, but I wonder what Tom's thoughts on this are. Anyone know any videos where he might talk about this? Thanks
Can AI process feelings - namely the feeling of understanding something - what Tom calls ‘information’ (as opposed to ‘data’) As far as I know, you can put symbols (‘data’) into an experience, but not the other way around. Anything physical can be conveyed by words, whereas no words can convey experience (how red looks, chocolate tastes, etc) - raising a paradox if we claim that experience can be explained by the physical I’m not saying AI cannot process feelings, but rather classical AI. This is in large part my motive for exploring quantum methods
@Apollyon 1975 - That depends on whether you accept theory or not. Nassim Haramein HAS explained the field as the “quantum blanket” (kind of goes back to the “fabric” of space time) as being composed of Planck spherical units being packed in a certain way (the flower of life pattern...sacred geometry) which leads to all of the sacred geometric parts that make up the hologram. He has used this field in his equations to actually explain what gravity is.
@@vishveshtadsare3160 Good question! Here's Tom's take on "what is real" (as opposed to what Materialists want to tell us is real) from his book (available for free on Google Books, BTW): ======== Because of its subjective and personal nature, it is difficult for researchers to encourage, define, or systematically and objectively study paranormal phenomena at a deep level. The most they can hope to do is observe and document its existence-a relatively simple thing that has been done thousands of times by hundreds of fully credentialed scientific researchers. Good objective scientific protocol requires the experimenters to remove all possible uncertainty, thus interfering with, and limiting, the psi effect being studied. Where some uncertainty is allowed, better results (from an insider's viewpoint) are produced. From an outsider's point of view, only less credible results are produced. There are always many more outsiders than insiders. (Here, insiders are the experimenters and their subjects; everyone else is an outsider.) Remote viewers, for example, cannot produce perfect high-resolution photographs for their experimenters-there is always some uncertainty, and usually (over an in-depth set of experiments) at least some inconsistency. Additional uncertainty grows quickly in the minds of individuals who are not personally in total control of the experimental protocols; it grows more quickly in the minds of those who are not physically witnessing the paranormal event (they read about it, hear about it, or see it on TV). How much uncertainty is necessary? Only enough to ensure that the vast majority of PMR citizens [Physical Matter Reality, what Tom calls the world we (apparently) live in here] will not have their cherished delusions forcibly perturbed to a significant degree. If a paranormal event (precognitive dream or vision, for example) is without uncertainty, the number of people who can objectively verify this perfect demonstration of psi will always be small enough to produce no major or lasting impact on the larger society. Those individuals who are not yet ready to perceive and understand the larger truth represented by paranormal events must not be forced to experience what they cannot productively deal with. In the bigger picture, there must always be enough uncertainty to ensure that the perceived causal integrity of PMR (the delusion that the only reality that can possibly exist must be objective and physical) can adequately be maintained by all who are not yet developmentally ready to move beyond that most basic worldview. From the opposite direction and within a smaller picture, the natural uncertainty surrounding a given event, or sequence of events, enables and simplifies the application of focused consciousness to paranormally influence that event without violating the psi uncertainty principle. On the other hand, objective physical experience is designed to be shared and held in common. Our physical experience forms an interactive virtual reality exhibiting a uniform common causality defined by the space-time rule-set. PMR physics is simply a subset of the space-time rule-set (this idea will be developed thoroughly in Section 4). Everybody can experience the same measurable effects in PMR; however, the necessary (by the psi uncertainty principle) uncertainty that must reside at the root cause of psi effects (from a scientific PMR objective perspective) is not appreciated by the PMR scientist whose methodology requires him to eliminate uncertainty. The inability to eliminate uncertainty will frustrate the scientist's desire to understand the deeper causal mechanics of psi phenomena. PMR scientists are culturally driven to interpret what they experience in a way that is in consonance with their belief that PMR causality must contain all possible phenomena. At best, if they are patient and careful, they can demonstrate that psi phenomena merely exist, but the causal mechanics and certain repeatability of it will elude them. Their attempt to describe a phenomenon belonging to a more general and less constrained causality in terms of a less general and more constrained causality is futile. The Big Picture and Big Reality cannot be fully contained within the little picture-quite the contrary, the little picture and little reality must be a subset of the larger reality. This is not rocket science. The little limited one must be a subset of the big unlimited one-it cannot be the other way around. Requiring the Big Picture reality to be described exclusively in terms of a local little picture reality is an incredibly dumb idea [. . . ]. However, it is an amusing fact that many of the world's scientists are totally stumped by this trivial concept. If they cannot physically define and control consciousness and psi effects, then neither can be verified to exist as an independent entity or real phenomenon. Consciousness is seen as a hallucination of physical biochemical processes while psi effects are seen as a hallucination of psychological processes. By believing that what is real is delusional, and that what is delusional is real, scientists have boxed themselves into a small corner of reality that does not contain the answers they are looking for. Worse yet, their standard definition of an unscientific fool is anyone who does not share their mystical belief in the sacred One Physical Reality. Some things never change. Hey, look on the bright side; at least physicians are no longer bleeding us with leeches. PMR science will always fail to explain nonphysical phenomena as physical phenomena. Psi phenomena, from the PMR-only viewpoint, will never be sufficiently well behaved nor deeply understood, thus generating much uncertainty in the minds of the masses. The mystery of how or why psi works (or even the existence of psi effects for that matter) appears to remain unsolved and unsolvable regardless of how many times it is thoroughly solved and demonstrated by knowledgeable individuals. If you are not one of those individuals, or involved with one, or do not know one well enough to fully trust their intelligence and integrity, you probably do not get it at the personal level of Big Truth. Without personal study and careful evaluated first-hand experience, those who are unable to maintain open minded skepticism are forced by their ego-needs to either believe in the actuality of paranormal events or to disbelieve in the actuality of paranormal events-both of which are illogical positions that produce a plethora of worthless unscientific blather. The realness of psi effects must be personally experienced to be accepted or understood. Thus, sharing a piece of Big Picture knowledge or Big Truth (gained through the firsthand experience of psi effects by psi researchers or anyone else) by publishing research papers, books, or using the mass media is totally useless and ineffective. The results of psi research that confirm the existence of psi effects will never be widely accepted or believed, irrespective of how carefully and professionally the experiment was conducted, because believing such results directly conflicts with other beliefs more deeply held. On the other hand, when scientifically evaluated psi effects are part of your personal experience (especially where you are the actor, not the observer), then a larger reality is no longer a matter of belief and you know the truth even if you do not understand the mechanism behind the truth. Those who are ready to progress to the next level of being will somehow discover the truth, while those who are not ready will remain clueless until some growth experience opens their mind to the possibilities. One cannot develop a deep personal understanding from somebody else's research or from somebody else's experience. This particular learning process is not primarily intellectual, like learning calculus; it is more experiential, like a one year old child learning to walk. Much of the uncertainty clouding psi effects is the result of belief traps retarding the evolution of consciousness within OS [those PMRs and NonPMRs that we have access to]. As long as conscious awareness and quality remain dim and low respectively, psi effects will remain shrouded in uncertainty, mysterious, and without credibility. As the quality of consciousness grows and awareness brightens across our culture, the purposeful application of psi effects will step out of the shadows and take their rightful place alongside contemplation, complex verbal and symbolic communications, and tool-making as innate human capabilities. ~~Tom Campbell, “MyBig TOE”
Hi Tom... love greetings from Germany. Could you please activate the automatic translation help for your video. That would be very helpful for people, like me, who would like to understand your content and are not that good in English. From 💛 to 💛 S. (Hamburg)
I asked Donna to look into it and this is her reply: "[The automatic translation function] doesn't look like it is available to us. The place where you can select "auto-translate" is greyed out. What appears to be available is manually entering the subtitles"?
It takes TH-cam a few days to process the auto-translation. It was finished just last week and automatically turned on, but it is still just the "auto-generated English subtitles". I am working on a properly edited English translation that might do better for you running it through "Google Translate", that will be appended soon. ;-)
If our reality is a simulation, using Ochams razor it would be made on a flat motionless plain. Why use all that computing power to make the earth a moving sphere when it’s not required. Seems a lot of programming for no reason.
If you simulate the initial conditions for the big bang and then just let it explode and run its course, eventually you'll naturally end up with spherical planets, not flat motionless plains. There is no way to end up with flat, motionless plains starting with a big bang.
HI TOM FROM INDIA 🇮🇳 I am sarfaraj. I know you know many thing about india as you have mension in your many videos about Ghandi and other theory from India. I AM MUSLIM AND I WAS LUCKY THAT I AM RIGHT BRAIN PERSON DEVELOPING LEFT AS WELL AS BECAUSE LEFT BRAIN MUSLIM WILL TAKE LONG TIME TO GET YOUR THEORY, THEY ANSWER EVERY THING WITH ALLA DID JUST THE DEBATE IS FINISH. 😭 people are thinking I am weird I am trying my hard day - night meditating to get to the point consciousness . I have seen your many workshop please can you make video on showing you remote viewing 🙏🙏🙏🙏 please. The remote view can be like predicting news headline or any other way you can show please tom. thank you for your theory . My question ⬇ Q.1 please share more detail about your process of getting into point of consciousnes please use a scream or papper to show how get to the point consciousnes. Please share in more details. Thank you I will spread your theory in India soon. Wish you live long. Wish you a healthy life.
Now I understand why being an RPG gamer at my teenage helped me not Just scaping reality, for inability to Deal with my emotions, but also for understanding all of this, and How much ancient texts relate so well ...when you walk knowing this is a dream in Consciousness is easier and funnier to live fully in the now, and fully in love with everything that surrounds you...it's a game
Thank you Tom and the others.
Much love my dears
Digital physics answers EVERY problem scientists have with Quantum physics.
Link to part one: th-cam.com/video/7QrLJjQbHOE/w-d-xo.html
Tom Campbell: Science, Math and My Big TOE
Thank you! 👍
Yes! I love this kind of videos... Thanks Tom!
Very interesting presentation. Thanks for posting! 👍
Still not sure how VR solves the double slit observer paradox. There were results (interference pattern) without observer also. Can it be that some basic processes always trigger, like a timed function, but without all parameters in place the function spits out the interference pattern??
The interference pattern is the default result in the absence of an observer.
If an interference pattern is eventually discovered, then there is an observer.
The act of observation includes an interaction, which collapses the state. If you observe them before they enter, the wave function collapses and the probability amplitude only originates from one of the slits, so there is no interference and no pattern. If it is not observed, the single photon's probability amplitude originates from both slits, interferes with itself, and causes a pattern. And to be extremely clear: The act of observation means there is an interaction with the photon, the effect of this interaction is amplified through the physical apparatus you use to measure it, until you are producing a measurement for a macroscopic variable. The act of observing an object means you have to probe it in some way. There's some information you are extracting from it, whatever mediator for this is used required it to interact with what's under observation. When you take a picture, the light interacts with the object and then the camera interacts with that light. If light just passed through the object, unaffected, nothing would show up on the camera
classic example would be the Stern-Gerlach experiments with the behavior of spin-1/2 particles
Is there a tree? A forest? An avatar? Oxygen? A brain inside your head? Nothing needs to be rendered untill the system is called apon to do so. Consciousness is fundamental and outside the system? A digital probabilistic system means to me that there's no tree..and no forest? Your thoughts.
@@waynerichardson1051 "Nothing needs to be rendered untill the system is called apon to do so"
Called by who?
Bacteria? You? Rocks? ATOMS?
i think you have a bad case of making arbitrarly distinction of what "conciousness" or what a "player" is, this is purely arbitrary segregations made by the logical brain.
there is no seperation, and so no arbitrary distinction is made as to what to "render" because ALL things are conciousness, one piece of conciousness does not get more or less "rendered"
the world is always there because its always observed by itself.
I've been following and observing you for about a year now, and just waiting until you realize that your research is proving that we have a creator. Well done. We may not agree on everything but you have great research never ever touched upon by other research. Still waiting for the lab results.
@Jason Ski - I’m not sure what realization you are waiting for on his part...he has stated over and over again that the LCS (Larger Consciousness System) is God if you want to call it that. He will never use the religious terminology that you want him to as all of that is contaminated (your God is not the same as mine and all the belief differences, etc., etc.). Nor should he use such terminology since it all has a bias. He’s bigger picture...showing that we ALL come from the SAME source. You can call it whatever you want...but until everyone gets away from their personal beliefs and can see a bigger picture, the world will remain in the state it is. All beliefs block larger insight as Tom states...no matter what those beliefs are. The “Creator” is not an anthropomorphic creator with some rule book telling you that you have to do this and that and the other or you are condemned. He is showing that is infantile. The “Creator”, the LCS, is ALL there is. There IS nothing else. Everything that is, in physical or non-physical realities is all a part of the LCS including you and I. There is nothing outside of this. If there actually is something outside of the LCS...i.e. questioning if the LCS is part of something larger, you can never know that as it will all be speculation. It can’t be more than that. If you are within a system, there is no way for you to see outside that system when you are a part of it. All you can do is speculate. The thing that makes you think that you are a separate entity is actually an unparalleled gift: free will. It is this mechanism that allows you to “separate” from the LCS and make choices about what you want to do and learn and what you want to experience and where you want to go to do it. Without free will, you would just remain part of the LCS without any separate beingness or experience.
@@Hermetic7 Thank you for your comments. You helped clarify some things. Although I understand and agree with most of what you said, there are a couple things that I believe logic and science do tell a different story. But I'll save that for a later time.
@@iso1600 - I’m genuinely curious on which points you think logic and science tell a different story.
@@Hermetic7 Scientific evidence which directly contradict evo theory. Scientific evidence that directly supports creation in accordance with the biblical record, Noah's flood, and past water canopy which was 95% bigger than our current atmosphere. It served as a radiation shield, which explains why people lived much longer before the flood. After the water, from within (proven), and the water in the canopy was let out to cause a worldwide flood, records show that average lifespans changed downward. Before the flood, the water canopy not only served as a radiation shield, but also explains why there were tropical forests at the poles. The common misconception, is that according to the disproven Evo theory, people say this happened over millions of years. Total hogwash. The mammoths which were frozen, still had food in their upper digestive system, when they were suddenly killed by sudden temp changes and floods. Plants were frozen. Bugs were frozen. Every mountain on this planet, is covered in aquatic fossils, but these fossils are stacked with and mixed with the entire "million year old" evo timetable of animals, as well as current day animal fossils, and floating log, plant, and vegetation debris, with animals showing signs of sudden catastrophic death with flood like aftermath burials. This is found in every country in every location, including the grand canyon.
So, that's what I meant by science and logic. In just one small miniscule aspect of scientific evidence, which I barely touched on, it is clear that the biblical record deems greater respect than some "scientists" are giving it.
@@Hermetic7 and let me know what you think, as well. I love discussion on this matter, with people who show genuine interest. Hopefully, we will remain as unbiased as we can, and remove our emotions from the discussion. And that's what I feel you've done. You've clearly tried to help me better understand your viewpoint and my misconceptions, in a logical and scientific manner. Thank you.
The Scietific Data from Dean Radin would match your perspective quite well.
This series is incredible. Where did you say you linked the slides you used?
Nothing mystifying about “action at a distance”. Because the universe is a pixelated virtual reality it’s the same as a TV screen. There’s 50 inches across yet the pixels fire at exactly the same time, no matter the distance, as from the tube it’s the same distance to anywhere on that screen.
Es so mega gut erklärt. Vielen Dank an alle
Hi Tom... What about the coherency of the history of the interactions of the generated parts of space with already existing parts of space?
If the LCS, say, generates a galaxy where nobody has ever looked at, this galaxy should have millions of civilisations with a complex history which would have probably interacted with already existing civilisations. The only problem is that they never did, because they never existed before being observed and generated. The LCS should generate a galaxy with civilisations that have never interacted with other existing civilisations. This would be highly improbable, though. Would the LCS just generate galaxies that have been isolated ever since?
No LCS generated spacetime exists or may exist other than in potentia if not "inhabited" by conscious entities. This universe exists only as data streamed to the conscious entities logged on to this PMR "game" from "consciousness space" We are not here, we exist in and as consciousness experiencing the fully immersive illusion of being here.
@@crangonvulgaris9820 the universe seems teeming with all sorts of intelligent life though, and most of them seem to have broken the barrier of the speed of light thanks to tech that interfaces with consciousness. Hell, we are monkeys genetically modified by the Elohim. We always had contact and we always will.
The LCS generates nothing more than what that specific telescope sees, i.e., after drawing one of the possibilities, it puts the appropriate color and intensity on each pixel of the telescopes viewscreen.
@@twcjr44 thanks for answering. So this means that if we went there we wouldn't find civilisations? Or we would, as soon as they would be generated when we, as observers, take a look there?
Wait, this implies that this would be a civilisation of NPCs without a consciousness that observes.
Are we doomed to find only deserted worlds with NPC critters in this reality? Your hypothesis of a reality made just for us (with the occasional hyperdimensional interaction from other civilisations from other reality frames), using consciousness as a common ground, makes more sense if this is so.
@@YouNolf If there are conscious entities/beings there in our universe, then they would be receiving their own data stream. They wouldn't be NPC's, they are also consciousness having a physical experience just as you are. Their reality is also being generated such as our is, but you don't need that data about their reality until you observe their realty. Until then, the exist only as probability to you. Same concept as person you have never met who is taking a walk in the woods somewhere, those woods don't exist in your data stream, but that doens't means it doesn't exist in other peoples data stream.
What is Tom's thoughts in AI? If a system is built that is non organic and capable of learning and self modifying, would it eventually have a consciousness? The materialist in me says Yes! With sufficient complexity will come self awareness, but I wonder what Tom's thoughts on this are. Anyone know any videos where he might talk about this? Thanks
Can AI process feelings - namely the feeling of understanding something - what Tom calls ‘information’ (as opposed to ‘data’)
As far as I know, you can put symbols (‘data’) into an experience, but not the other way around. Anything physical can be conveyed by words, whereas no words can convey experience (how red looks, chocolate tastes, etc) - raising a paradox if we claim that experience can be explained by the physical
I’m not saying AI cannot process feelings, but rather classical AI. This is in large part my motive for exploring quantum methods
Thank you so much 😊
Thank you ❤️🙏🏻❤️
Has trilogy changed in 5 years? Do I need a new copy?
Also how does the Big TOE model compare to Biocentrism?
No.
@@thelcs5018 Thank you. Apologies for late response.
The Big Bang is not so hard to work out. There’s a “Big bang” of information when my PlayStation boots up...............
My Xbox is updating.. Wish I had a PlayStation again. 😂
Scientists will talk about fields all the time. What not one can do is explain what a field is.
@Apollyon 1975 - That depends on whether you accept theory or not. Nassim Haramein HAS explained the field as the “quantum blanket” (kind of goes back to the “fabric” of space time) as being composed of Planck spherical units being packed in a certain way (the flower of life pattern...sacred geometry) which leads to all of the sacred geometric parts that make up the hologram. He has used this field in his equations to actually explain what gravity is.
Why isn't lcs perfect?
Because it's a real system, and it's constantly growing and evolving.
@@steak8278 How do you know I am perfect?
@@jamieedmonds574 and what is real?
@@vishveshtadsare3160 Good question! Here's Tom's take on "what is real" (as opposed to what Materialists want to tell us is real) from his book (available for free on Google Books, BTW):
========
Because of its subjective and personal nature, it is difficult for researchers to encourage, define, or systematically and objectively study paranormal phenomena at a deep level. The most they can hope to do is observe and document its existence-a relatively simple thing that has been done thousands of times by hundreds of fully credentialed scientific researchers.
Good objective scientific protocol requires the experimenters to remove all possible uncertainty, thus interfering with, and limiting, the psi effect being studied. Where some uncertainty is allowed, better results (from an insider's viewpoint) are produced. From an outsider's point of view, only less credible results are produced. There are always many more outsiders than insiders. (Here, insiders are the experimenters and their subjects; everyone else is an outsider.)
Remote viewers, for example, cannot produce perfect high-resolution photographs for their experimenters-there is always some uncertainty, and usually (over an in-depth set of experiments) at least some inconsistency. Additional uncertainty grows quickly in the minds of individuals who are not personally in total control of the experimental protocols; it grows more quickly in the minds of those who are not physically witnessing the paranormal event (they read about it, hear about it, or see it on TV). How much uncertainty is necessary? Only enough to ensure that the vast majority of PMR citizens [Physical Matter Reality, what Tom calls the world we (apparently) live in here] will not have their cherished delusions forcibly perturbed to a significant degree.
If a paranormal event (precognitive dream or vision, for example) is without uncertainty, the number of people who can objectively verify this perfect demonstration of psi will always be small enough to produce no major or lasting impact on the larger society. Those individuals who are not yet ready to perceive and understand the larger truth represented by paranormal events must not be forced to experience what they cannot productively deal with. In the bigger picture, there must always be enough uncertainty to ensure that the perceived causal integrity of PMR (the delusion that the only reality that can possibly exist must be objective and physical) can adequately be maintained by all who are not yet developmentally ready to move beyond that most basic worldview. From the opposite direction and within a smaller picture, the natural uncertainty surrounding a given event, or sequence of events, enables and simplifies the application of focused consciousness to paranormally influence that event without violating the psi uncertainty principle.
On the other hand, objective physical experience is designed to be shared and held in common. Our physical experience forms an interactive virtual reality exhibiting a uniform common causality defined by the space-time rule-set. PMR physics is simply a subset of the space-time rule-set (this idea will be developed thoroughly in Section 4). Everybody can experience the same measurable effects in PMR; however, the necessary (by the psi uncertainty principle) uncertainty that must reside at the root cause of psi effects (from a scientific PMR objective perspective) is not appreciated by the PMR scientist whose methodology requires him to eliminate uncertainty. The inability to eliminate uncertainty will frustrate the scientist's desire to understand the deeper causal mechanics of psi phenomena.
PMR scientists are culturally driven to interpret what they experience in a way that is in consonance with their belief that PMR causality must contain all possible phenomena. At best, if they are patient and careful, they can demonstrate that psi phenomena merely exist, but the causal mechanics and certain repeatability of it will elude them. Their attempt to describe a phenomenon belonging to a more general and less constrained causality in terms of a less general and more constrained causality is futile. The Big Picture and Big Reality cannot be fully contained within the little picture-quite the contrary, the little picture and little reality must be a subset of the larger reality. This is not rocket science. The little limited one must be a subset of the big unlimited one-it cannot be the other way around.
Requiring the Big Picture reality to be described exclusively in terms of a local little picture reality is an incredibly dumb idea [. . . ]. However, it is an amusing fact that many of the world's scientists are totally stumped by this trivial concept. If they cannot physically define and control consciousness and psi effects, then neither can be verified to exist as an independent entity or real phenomenon. Consciousness is seen as a hallucination of physical biochemical processes while psi effects are seen as a hallucination of psychological processes. By believing that what is real is delusional, and that what is delusional is real, scientists have boxed themselves into a small corner of reality that does not contain the answers they are looking for. Worse yet, their standard definition of an unscientific fool is anyone who does not share their mystical belief in the sacred One Physical Reality. Some things never change. Hey, look on the bright side; at least physicians are no longer bleeding us with leeches.
PMR science will always fail to explain nonphysical phenomena as physical phenomena. Psi phenomena, from the PMR-only viewpoint, will never be sufficiently well behaved nor deeply understood, thus generating much uncertainty in the minds of the masses. The mystery of how or why psi works (or even the existence of psi effects for that matter) appears to remain unsolved and unsolvable regardless of how many times it is thoroughly solved and demonstrated by knowledgeable individuals. If you are not one of those individuals, or involved with one, or do not know one well enough to fully trust their intelligence and integrity, you probably do not get it at the personal level of Big Truth. Without personal study and careful evaluated first-hand experience, those who are unable to maintain open minded skepticism are forced by their ego-needs to either believe in the actuality of paranormal events or to disbelieve in the actuality of paranormal events-both of which are illogical positions that produce a plethora of worthless unscientific blather.
The realness of psi effects must be personally experienced to be accepted or understood. Thus, sharing a piece of Big Picture knowledge or Big Truth (gained through the firsthand experience of psi effects by psi researchers or anyone else) by publishing research papers, books, or using the mass media is totally useless and ineffective. The results of psi research that confirm the existence of psi effects will never be widely accepted or believed, irrespective of how carefully and professionally the experiment was conducted, because believing such results directly conflicts with other beliefs more deeply held. On the other hand, when scientifically evaluated psi effects are part of your personal experience (especially where you are the actor, not the observer), then a larger reality is no longer a matter of belief and you know the truth even if you do not understand the mechanism behind the truth.
Those who are ready to progress to the next level of being will somehow discover the truth, while those who are not ready will remain clueless until some growth experience opens their mind to the possibilities. One cannot develop a deep personal understanding from somebody else's research or from somebody else's experience. This particular learning process is not primarily intellectual, like learning calculus; it is more experiential, like a one year old child learning to walk.
Much of the uncertainty clouding psi effects is the result of belief traps retarding the evolution of consciousness within OS [those PMRs and NonPMRs that we have access to]. As long as conscious awareness and quality remain dim and low respectively, psi effects will remain shrouded in uncertainty, mysterious, and without credibility. As the quality of consciousness grows and awareness brightens across our culture, the purposeful application of psi effects will step out of the shadows and take their rightful place alongside contemplation, complex verbal and symbolic communications, and tool-making as innate human capabilities.
~~Tom Campbell, “MyBig TOE”
@@thelcs5018 😂
Hi Tom... love greetings from Germany. Could you please activate the automatic translation help for your video. That would be very helpful for people, like me, who would like to understand your content and are not that good in English. From 💛 to 💛 S. (Hamburg)
I asked Donna to look into it and this is her reply: "[The automatic translation function] doesn't look like it is available to us. The place where you can select "auto-translate" is greyed out.
What appears to be available is manually entering the subtitles"?
It takes TH-cam a few days to process the auto-translation. It was finished just last week and automatically turned on, but it is still just the "auto-generated English subtitles". I am working on a properly edited English translation that might do better for you running it through "Google Translate", that will be appended soon. ;-)
✨🔥✨
Nifty
Bernardo Kastrup would approve you...
If our reality is a simulation, using Ochams razor it would be made on a flat motionless plain. Why use all that computing power to make the earth a moving sphere when it’s not required. Seems a lot of programming for no reason.
If you simulate the initial conditions for the big bang and then just let it explode and run its course, eventually you'll naturally end up with spherical planets, not flat motionless plains. There is no way to end up with flat, motionless plains starting with a big bang.
This.. anybody that still believes we live on a ball and space is real is either a shill or a npc.
@@britishempires npc?
@@DollaRich12 Non Playing Character aka a bot.
If Earth is a simulation, then perhaps it is neither round nor flat. It is just an illusion/assumption within consciousness.
HI TOM FROM INDIA 🇮🇳
I am sarfaraj.
I know you know many thing about india as you have mension in your many videos about Ghandi and other theory from India.
I AM MUSLIM AND I WAS LUCKY THAT I AM RIGHT BRAIN PERSON DEVELOPING LEFT AS WELL AS BECAUSE LEFT BRAIN MUSLIM WILL TAKE LONG TIME TO GET YOUR THEORY, THEY ANSWER EVERY THING WITH ALLA DID JUST THE DEBATE IS FINISH.
😭 people are thinking I am weird I am trying my hard day - night meditating to get to the point consciousness . I have seen your many workshop please can you make video on showing you remote viewing 🙏🙏🙏🙏 please. The remote view can be like predicting news headline or any other way you can show please tom.
thank you for your theory . My question ⬇
Q.1 please share more detail about your process of getting into point of consciousnes please use a scream or papper to show how get to the point consciousnes. Please share in more details.
Thank you I will spread your theory in India soon. Wish you live long. Wish you a healthy life.