History of Colonialism(1433-2023): Every Year(V2)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video shows the rise and fall of various colonial empires, as well as their enemies. This video is a remake of my older one on the same subject
    history of every year
    history of
    history of the world
    history of the world map
    history of map
    history of the world every year
    colonial era
    victorian era
    victorian era map
    ww1 ww2
    world war 1 map
    world war 2 map
    history of colonialism
    history of colonialism every year
    history of colonialism map
    history of imperialism
    history of imperialism every year
    history of imperialism map
    what we thought the world looks like
    500 years of european colonialism
    european colonialism
    history of the portuguese empire
    history of the portuguese empire map
    history of the portuguese empire every year
    rise and fall of the portuguese empire
    history of portugal
    history of portugal every year
    history of portugal map
    history of portugal map every year
    portuguese empire
    portugal
    portugal map
    portuguese empire map
    history of the spanish empire
    history of the spanish empire map
    history of the spanish empire every year
    rise and fall of the spanish empire
    history of spain
    history of spain every year
    history of spain map
    history of spain map every year
    spanish empire
    spain
    spain map
    spanish empire map
    history of the french empire
    history of the french empire map
    history of the french empire every year
    rise and fall of the french empire
    history of france
    history of france every year
    history of france map
    history of france map every year
    french empire
    france
    france map
    frenchempire map
    history of the british empire
    history of the british empire map
    history of the british empire every year
    rise and fall of the british empire
    history of uk
    history of united kingdom every year
    history of uk map
    history of uk map every year
    british empire
    united kingdom
    united kingdom map
    british empire map
    history of the italian empire
    history of the italian empire map
    history of the italian empire every year
    rise and fall of the italian empire
    history of italy
    history of italy every year
    history of italy map
    history of italy map every year
    italian empire
    italy
    italy map
    italian empire map
    history of the german empire
    history of the german empire map
    history of the german empire every year
    rise and fall of the german empire
    history of germany
    history of germany every year
    history of germany map
    history of germany map every year
    german empire
    germany
    germany map
    german empire map
    history of the dutch empire
    history of the dutch empire map
    history of the dutch empire every year
    rise and fall of the dutch empire
    history of the netherlands
    history of the netherlands every year
    history of the netherlands map
    history of the netherlands map every year
    dutch empire
    the netherlands
    the netherlands map
    dutch empire map
    the pirate republic
    louisiana
    french colonies in america
    thirteen colonies
    american revolution
    latin american wars of independence
    australia colony
    new zealand colony
    canada colony
    colonial india
    british raj
    british east india company
    dutch eas india company
    south africa dominion
    scramble for africa
    conquest of africa
    ethiopia
    brazil colony
    denmark colonies
    sweden colonies
    Music:
    A villa voy
    Americana - Kevin MacLeod
    Falalalan - Europa Universalis IV soundtrack
    British Grenadiers Fife and Drum
    A Day at Court - Victoria II soundtrack
    Now We are Free - The Gladiator Soundtrack
    Sources:
    Wikipedia
    Duby Historical Atlas
    The Early History of Greater Mexico
    Aztlan Historian
    DK Atlas of World History
    Yeast Cartography
    Omniatlas
    Past Works
    InvasionofAmerica
    IDA Treaties explorer
    Native-land.ca

ความคิดเห็น • 242

  • @animalpolitic6925
    @animalpolitic6925  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    This video is a remake of my old(er) colonialism video. This video does NOT seek to glorify, justify or advance colonialism or colonialist principles/worldviews. It is solely meant as historical documentation. Any hateful comments will be deleted. I also feel like I need to point something out about how to read the map
    If a nation simply claims a land, then it is shown in the palest color.
    If a country claims some land, those boundaries are recognized 'internationally' and it is treated as a province rather than a claim, but the native peoples do not recognize that claim/have not ceded that land/have not been subdued, then the region will be shown with colored borders. That means that the European nation in question considers that her land and that claim is recognized in a strictly legal sense, but is not actually colonized (or, in the case of Canada and the US, ceded). The reason this is important is because we often treat tribal lands as completely occupied, rather than simply claimed.

    • @eksiarvamus
      @eksiarvamus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You should have shown the USSR as a colonial empire - the different parts definitely did not want to be part of that evil shithole of a country.

    • @user-lk7bj1nx5e
      @user-lk7bj1nx5e 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Tibet, Xinjiang, Cachemire, Western Sahara, Golan...

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is wrong. Colonialism did not start with the Portuguese and Spanish. Before the Portuguese and Spanish colonial empires, there were long before colonial empires like the Roman Empire! But even before the Roman Empire there were colonial empires like the Persian Empire. But even after the Roman Empire but before the Portuguese and Spanish Empires, there were colonial empires such as the Polish Empire. Because the Ruthenian territories were nothing other than Polish colonies, which were also exploited and settled. So it makes no sense to show the start of colonialism with the Portuguese and Spanish!

  • @88888j
    @88888j หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Why did they leave out Arab colonialism?

  • @GF-yh9tb
    @GF-yh9tb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If you count the Azores and Madeira at the beginning you should have also counted the Canary Islands for Spain.

  • @kaastermdk
    @kaastermdk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I think you could also have included Chile and Argentina (as for the Desert Campaigns), China, or even the Ottoman Empire. Other than that, this was a very complete video.

  • @Hoomun4013
    @Hoomun4013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video, i haven't seen a video yet that included the ones like malta, courland and klein venedig.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    incredible video man

  • @lolnoobthemapper
    @lolnoobthemapper 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Really cool video!

  • @British_monarchist
    @British_monarchist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Really well done. But I wish you would have put the viceroyalties of Spain and crown colonies of britian with responsible government in the colonies with large autonomy section

    • @cjclark430
      @cjclark430 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      im pretty sure it wouldn’t fit

    • @SantiagoVerbel-j4l
      @SantiagoVerbel-j4l หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cjclark430The spanish territories in America were de facto independent from Castile, and officially independent from Aragon and other Spanish kingdoms, until the Bourbons, so it would fit.

    • @cjclark430
      @cjclark430 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SantiagoVerbel-j4l i meant like on the bottom

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not really well done! Because this is nonsense. Colonialism did not start with the Portuguese and Spanish. Before the Portuguese and Spanish colonial empires, there were long before colonial empires like the Roman Empire! But even before the Roman Empire there were colonial empires like the Persian Empire. But even after the Roman Empire but before the Portuguese and Spanish Empires, there were colonial empires such as the Polish Empire. Because the Ruthenian territories were nothing other than Polish colonies, which were also exploited and settled. So it makes no sense to show the start of colonialism with the Portuguese and Spanish!

    • @cjclark430
      @cjclark430 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@GreatPolishWingedHussars they were more like the russian empire where the lands ownedby the empire is connected

  • @WarfightersWorkshop
    @WarfightersWorkshop 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You only did European colonialism despite the Arab world and East Asia did it?

    • @animalpolitic6925
      @animalpolitic6925  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This video shows the progression of colonialism as understood in the modern era. I am not too sure what you mean. Japan was included and it is part of East Asia. The Arab world was more similar to the colonized rather than the colonizers. The only Arab country which would come close to a colonizing power was the Ottoman Empire. But the Ottomans did not engage in colonialism in the way we understand it

    • @mintviper5213
      @mintviper5213 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @animalpolitic6925 Oman had colonies in Africa (Zanzibar etc), research the Yarubid dynasty. You could indeed interpret Ottoman possessions outside of Anatolia as colonies, although the Ottoman empire is a Turkic country not Arab. Outside of the 1400's start date you could view the Arab expansions of the 600-700s as a colonial expansion with a lasting arabization effort. Also the ancient world was rife with colonialism but they are not directly comparable to the early modern colonial empires.

    • @Matt-fs9tg
      @Matt-fs9tg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s right, at no point did muslims sweep through Africa, Anatolia and the balkans imposing their religion, law and authority.

    • @animalpolitic6925
      @animalpolitic6925  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@mintviper5213 I do agree with your point about the ancient world, as I explained in another reply. However, if you stretch a definition far enough, you could make it say anything. If you interpret things in a certain way, you can argue that Alexander's empire, New Kingdom of Egypt, Holy Roman Empire, Kingdom of Hungary, Barbarian Kingdoms and post-independence Brazil were all colonial empires. Ethnocentrism is a feature of all empires(sometimes just for practical reasons, as cynical as that sounds). The Ottoman Empire ruled over many peoples and had a Turkic elite, but this does not mean colonialism automatically. Similarly, maritime empires are not necessarily always colonial. I am not sure if Oman counts as a colonial state. I might be wrong, but to me it seems more like a feudal society(for the lack of a better term), Omani Zanzibar being a vassal state. The same reason for which I did not include ancient empires(I explained it in more detail in another reply) applies here.

    • @British_monarchist
      @British_monarchist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ew

  • @sachemofboston3649
    @sachemofboston3649 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Ottoman Empire should count as well in my opinion. They were a vast multi ethnic empire with a ruling ethnic/religious class which had more rights than other ethnicities/religions, and were at constant war with colonial powers like Russia and Spain. Sure their expansion was more traditional, but so was Russia’s and they count.

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes that is correct. But that was after the Portuguese and Spanish expansion! However colonialism did not start with the Portuguese and Spanish. Before the Portuguese and Spanish colonial empires, there were long before colonial empires like the Roman Empire! But even before the Roman Empire there were colonial empires like the Persian Empire. But even after the Roman Empire but before the Portuguese and Spanish Empires, there were colonial empires such as the Polish Empire. Because the Ruthenian territories were nothing other than Polish colonies, which were also exploited and settled. So it makes no sense to show the start of colonialism with the Portuguese and Spanish!

  • @duduchannel6729
    @duduchannel6729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is well done, best video on the topic for sure

  • @davidbrasset5895
    @davidbrasset5895 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great work, thanks for uploading this. However the video tells the history of European colonialism between the 15th and 20th centuries, not the history of colonialism since the dawn of times. Colonizations happened long before the Renaissance in Europe. I would recommend to change the title as it is slightly missleading (something such as 'History of European Colonial Empires').

  • @mintviper5213
    @mintviper5213 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    You kinda forgot the ancient Greek and Carthaginian colonies, probably a lot more pre-1400s as well

    • @sagagis
      @sagagis 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      and Vikings

    • @animalpolitic6925
      @animalpolitic6925  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      First of all, thank you for the feedback! Second of all, I did not forget about those, I chose not to represent them. Sure, colonies existed in many places and technically they would fit as 'colonial empires'(as in empires whose most territory is made up of colonies). Look past the technicalities and labels and you'll realize that Athenian colonies in Ionia were very different from New Spain. Colonial empires specifically are a thing associated with the modern era. Ancient colonies were a totally different breed from modern colonies. ColonialISM is a tricky term to define(and could be understood as an ideology which the ancient era did not have) and there are debates about where to draw the line. However, everyone can agree that European overseas empires between 1500-1945 were colonial first and foremost. I feel like including ancient colonies would obfuscate the larger point, which is representing the expansion of colonial empires as understood in the modern era. Equating ancient empires to modern ones would also paint a dishonest picture.

    • @guilepesto
      @guilepesto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sagagisVikings didnt have collonial empires. The vikings just had one empire (North Sea Empire), but it was not a colonial empire

    • @epic.production
      @epic.production 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You really don't know what is the colonial era

  • @user-rk3uw2pu4i
    @user-rk3uw2pu4i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Where this russia? It's the least live colonial impair.

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yes, how can they not show Russia, one of the largest colonial empires! But there is also another error! Colonialism did not start with the Portuguese and Spanish. Before the Portuguese and Spanish colonial empires, there were long before colonial empires like the Roman Empire! But even before the Roman Empire there were colonial empires like the Persian Empire. But even after the Roman Empire but before the Portuguese and Spanish Empires, there were colonial empires such as the Polish Empire. Because the Ruthenian territories were nothing other than Polish colonies, which were also exploited and settled. So it makes no sense to show the start of colonialism with the Portuguese and Spanish!

  • @SoryRN
    @SoryRN หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    España no fue un imperio colonial

    • @sxberserk931
      @sxberserk931 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Si que lo fue, acomplejadito.

    • @SoryRN
      @SoryRN หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sxberserk931 ¿de que pais eres?

  • @bruh-kv5hs
    @bruh-kv5hs หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please rename your video "European colonialism" instead of just colonialism, arab,mongol colonizations exists yk

  • @talonyte9050
    @talonyte9050 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Technically, Denmark had the first colonial empire starting around the year 1000. Starting with colonizing Iceland, then Greenland, then Vinland (Canada)

    • @adge5182
      @adge5182 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      The first colonial empires were the Phoenician and greek city-states

    • @guilepesto
      @guilepesto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stop talking shit. People of Norway discovered America, not Denmark. And these people were outlaws of Norway (skogamor), they were not working for the Monarchy of Norway. Study before talking in internet

    • @sachemofboston3649
      @sachemofboston3649 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Colonialism has existed since the dawn of civilization, Denmark was far from the first colonial empire lol

    • @arvaakuka8568
      @arvaakuka8568 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Iceland was uninhabited before the Scandinavians. They settled the island rather than colonized it.

    • @sachemofboston3649
      @sachemofboston3649 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @arvaakuka8568 you’re forgetting about the Irish

  • @Bugttp
    @Bugttp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Technically the first colonies were created by the Greeks, long before the 1400s.

    • @Basilreda
      @Basilreda หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How deliosinal you act as if only white european can be colonist technically any empire is colonial so by that logic the first ever colonial empire is the Akkadian empire

    • @Chickenduudio
      @Chickenduudio หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@BasilredaNice English.

  • @LibrarianSankore
    @LibrarianSankore 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I know the maker probably isn't implying this but the common wealth of nations isn't comparable to the French Afrique. The French Afrique is basically France's network of vassal states while the common wealth is basically Britain creating a smaller UN. Countries don't join the French Afrique willingly while countries like rwanda have joint the common wealth of nations of their own accord.

    • @animalpolitic6925
      @animalpolitic6925  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Completely true. The label is simply 'colonial legacy'. It simply talks about institutions that were born from a colonial structure. What you're saying is true, the Commonwealth is indeed way more democratic than the French Afrique

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      “Countries don’t join the French Afrique willingly”
      like Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau? These are two former non-French colonies using the CFA franc

    • @mrsupremegascon
      @mrsupremegascon 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@animalpolitic6925 Can you tell us how Commonwealth is way more democratic than CFA area ?
      Also France Afrique doesn't exist, it's a concept made by those who criticizes French influence in the region, it's not a real thing.
      You made a video about colonisation, and yet believe the most clichés take on Western Africa politic. Another TH-cam that makes stuff on things he knows little about.

  • @atruv2089
    @atruv2089 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    does pink show commonwealth members regardless of if they have the British monarch as their own or not? In that case, Cyprus should be coloured as wel.
    Other than that, great video!

  • @polu_covas
    @polu_covas หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    USSR and Russian Federation are also colonial !

    • @hasane.nevruz5534
      @hasane.nevruz5534 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Free Çuvaşla

    • @polu_covas
      @polu_covas หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hasane.nevruz5534 Чӑваш Ен ирӗклӗ пулать! Chuvashia will be free! Çuvaşistan özgür olacak!

    • @user-zv9zc9bc2y
      @user-zv9zc9bc2y 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      No

    • @kirilll7806
      @kirilll7806 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      they are not

    • @user-tx7gd3ow4e
      @user-tx7gd3ow4e 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Соевую либераху спросить забыли

  • @aleixpucherodriguez8313
    @aleixpucherodriguez8313 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Castilians began the conquest of the Canary Islands in 1402. Si pones la conquista de las Açores y Madeira, o Cabo Verde, deberías poner las Islas Canarias.

  • @schmalettesm3264
    @schmalettesm3264 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    What about the colonization of central asia and west china by turks? What about the colonization of the middle east and north africa by arabs? This video doesn‘t even show 1/4 of colonial history.

    • @epic.production
      @epic.production 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      These do not belong to the colonial era. The era of colonialism was European

    • @Sheikh_diane
      @Sheikh_diane หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What Colonisation? Turks are Natives in Central Asia?!

    • @schmalettesm3264
      @schmalettesm3264 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sheikh_diane No, before the turks lived there, indo europeans/indo aryans (ancestors of modern day europeans and iranians) lived there.

    • @kartal6248
      @kartal6248 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      West china? Lmao Turks and other peoples inhabited these regions before the name of china was invented they were and are the colonists not Turks

    • @schmalettesm3264
      @schmalettesm3264 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kartal6248 the original inhabitants of xinjiang region were indo Europeans

  • @rosenchuchukov7227
    @rosenchuchukov7227 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Really every year?
    7 centuries Arab colonialism in Iberian peninsula and 5 centuries otoman in Eastern Europe are missing.

    • @failedbirthcontrol8995
      @failedbirthcontrol8995 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There was never no Arab colonialism

    • @epic.production
      @epic.production 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You dumb bro. The Arabs and the Ottomans conquered these lands, they did not colonize them. You don't know the meaning of the word "colonization"

    • @Wartenss
      @Wartenss หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's conquest, not colonialism

    • @SoryRN
      @SoryRN หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Wartenss
      Bias

    • @Wartenss
      @Wartenss หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SoryRN Wdym bias? I do not consider the crusades as colonization, neither roman expansion and so on.

  • @michaelowino228
    @michaelowino228 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good video.

  • @draphotube4315
    @draphotube4315 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bro you should have switched the colors of Portugal and the Netherlands.. EVERYONE knows the Netherlands should go orange... For the rest very epic video

  • @a_agadir3964
    @a_agadir3964 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Big mistake with Morocco in this video, you didnt include the ifni war of 1957 and the ceding of Cape Juby and Ifni as well as northern morocco were 2 decades late

  • @JP-elhistoriador
    @JP-elhistoriador 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A fast correction: The Tairona People live in the North of the current Republic of Colombia, near to the Guajira Peninsula, the territory you used to posisionate Tairona People actually is for the Calima people, and other etnicithies, as Yalcon People, and this people, as the Tairona, resisted in their territories for a hundred years in a guerrilla war, similar what the Mayas did.

  • @adge5182
    @adge5182 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Spain and Portugal have no colonies today, i dont think they should be levelled as if they have them.
    Still, pretty good video!

    • @user-rn9tz9qo5o
      @user-rn9tz9qo5o หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bueno ni ahora ni nunca, España jamás tubo colonias y de Portugal pues yo creo que tampoco tampoco sabría hablar en nombre de ellos pero creo que tampoco tubo colonias

    • @ThedeadaccountAL
      @ThedeadaccountAL หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are partly colonial because they did have colonies for centuries and they did exploit its subjects

    • @MiryaNeKizu
      @MiryaNeKizu หลายเดือนก่อน

      False. Those territories were never colonies​@@ThedeadaccountAL

    • @brunogoncas
      @brunogoncas หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ThedeadaccountALThese territories had the same status as European territories and the territorial organization was similar. In addition to that, the local inhabitants had the status of full citizens. (as long as they were Christians, the same thing happened in the territories of Europe)

    • @Danlovar
      @Danlovar หลายเดือนก่อน

      Technically, the UNO says Spain still has a colony, the west Sahara, but that is an difficult issue, and England says that if they want to return the argentinian Falklands they would return them to Spain as if saying something else.

  • @me1sTerweeD
    @me1sTerweeD 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video, very interesting to see colonialism unfold on a world scale!

  • @anderson._.._.8801
    @anderson._.._.8801 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You forgot ussr and Russian federation

    • @abuser-Milovidov
      @abuser-Milovidov หลายเดือนก่อน

      В чем проявлялся колониализм СССР?

  • @MrThiagist
    @MrThiagist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Missing pre 1400 and colors were confusing, like us x france and spain x portugal.

  • @mustko999
    @mustko999 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Portugal painted the world map

  • @unknownus63
    @unknownus63 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aha, so instead of a British Empire they have a Commonwealth now. Clever ...

    • @ommsterlitz1805
      @ommsterlitz1805 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Witch have no utility except receiving free money from Uk that's why these countries are in it same for France Franc as it give a stability to the currency

  • @ChristianJosson
    @ChristianJosson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    its hearting my eyes, seeing portugal isnt green or blue

  • @farfar6962
    @farfar6962 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where's new moscow from Djibouti

  • @cantrusthestory
    @cantrusthestory 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There's a flaw on this map; East Timor was not part of Portugal after 1975.
    And I'm saying that as a portuguese person.

  • @german9064
    @german9064 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you include the Spanish Empire and the Russian Empire, why don't you start earlier in history and include the Arab Empire, and the Germanic conquests of the Holy Roman Empire on the Baltic coast, and the Roman Empire, and that of Genghis Khan, and the Empire of Alexander, and the Persian Empire of Cyrus the Great?
    It's funny that in the end there are only a few circles: the Canary Islands, the Azores... which were never colonies. But from the Anglo-Saxon perspective, the conquests of the United States (i.e. its own current territory) don't count in the end. It's also a bit strange that in the end Russia doesn't appear anymore but the United States does (yes, the United States without a huge "colonial circle" that encompasses it entirely).

    • @Tago-h1b
      @Tago-h1b 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The video starts in the year 1433, so he probably wanted to make the Age of Discovery coincide with the European empires of the Modern Era.

  • @spanishmapper671
    @spanishmapper671 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Spain didnt colonize, this is just propaganda.

    • @winstonchurchill1940
      @winstonchurchill1940 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      ☝️🤓

    • @spanishmapper671
      @spanishmapper671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@winstonchurchill1940 its facts tho

    • @winstonchurchill1940
      @winstonchurchill1940 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@spanishmapper671 Did you sleep during history class?

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Its like saying France didn’t colonize Algeria

    • @spanishmapper671
      @spanishmapper671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@winstonchurchill1940 Nah i was the teacher

  • @larryschultz3139
    @larryschultz3139 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great work but the Ottoman and Soviet Empires should have been included.

    • @mint8648
      @mint8648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They committed many atrocities, but werent colonial

  • @zed381no5
    @zed381no5 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those state boundaries

  • @youtubesangryopinionramble1465
    @youtubesangryopinionramble1465 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Free Caledonia

  • @MiryaNeKizu
    @MiryaNeKizu หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why is spain and Portugal still collored in 2023 if what they have r not colonies

    • @astrofabio68
      @astrofabio68 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SPAIN HAS CANARIES ISLAND

    • @MiryaNeKizu
      @MiryaNeKizu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@astrofabio68 those are not colonies. To call them colonies shoes extreme levels of ignorance

  • @CannibaLouiST
    @CannibaLouiST 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ming is colonial empire?

  • @user-yq9ks8fb9l
    @user-yq9ks8fb9l 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is there no Russian Antarctic expedition?

  • @Single_love905
    @Single_love905 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    4:18 are not big colonial dutch 🇳🇱😅

  • @borghese84
    @borghese84 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ottoman Empire : Am I a joke to you?

  • @breizhledaw7674
    @breizhledaw7674 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about Turkye ? China ? Japan ? What about the Dar Al Islam ?

  • @PatrioteQuebecois
    @PatrioteQuebecois 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Colonialism started way before 1433! You can go back to Ancient Egypt at least.

  • @miguelangelduartemendoza3214
    @miguelangelduartemendoza3214 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what is name of game

  • @ralang999
    @ralang999 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Castilians invaded the Canary islands and committed genocide against the native Guanches in 1405

    • @Tago-h1b
      @Tago-h1b 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      In 1402 the conquest of the Canary Islands began with the expedition to Lanzarote of the Normans Jean de Bethencourt and Gadifer de la Salle.
      The Crown of Castile did not intervene until 1477.
      There was no such genocide, there is Guanche DNA in the current inhabitants of the Canary Islands.
      There was miscegenation, as in Spanish America.

  • @nolifergustav3741
    @nolifergustav3741 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So wrong portration of Greenland, you are missing out on Norways colonialism there

  • @youtubesangryopinionramble1465
    @youtubesangryopinionramble1465 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Strange how the Holy Land is only there from 1917-1947.

  • @mint8648
    @mint8648 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’m glad you didn’t show China and other Islamic empires as colonial because they made no such distinctions between mother country and colony. Either you were a province of an empire, or a vassal under local governance.

    • @Mateus-ir3vv
      @Mateus-ir3vv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not true

    • @pyrusheliosmk2204
      @pyrusheliosmk2204 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China and other Islamic empires?

  • @trollgegael
    @trollgegael 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you showed ireland being partially free in 1611 when it was only until 1607, also you didnt list the caucusus rebels as enemies of colonization

  • @paulchanut6953
    @paulchanut6953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1852-70 its 2nd french empire not french republic

  • @SoryRN
    @SoryRN หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is islamic colonialism in africa and southern europe?

  • @Userk200
    @Userk200 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Morocco colonized west Africa in 16th century

  • @gisg9398
    @gisg9398 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The best period

  • @abccdef5805
    @abccdef5805 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Japans are on map but Turks are not however they have colonies in Africa, Sumatra and Arabian peninsula

    • @pyrusheliosmk2204
      @pyrusheliosmk2204 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We do not have any colonies!

    • @abccdef5805
      @abccdef5805 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pyrusheliosmk2204 please learn history bro.

    • @pyrusheliosmk2204
      @pyrusheliosmk2204 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@abccdef5805 show me just one single search, what we ever did colonised anyone!

    • @abccdef5805
      @abccdef5805 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pyrusheliosmk2204 ottoman empire was a European power and bedside mainland in Europe and middle East also had African colonies

    • @pyrusheliosmk2204
      @pyrusheliosmk2204 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@abccdef5805 IT DID NOT! We didn't have colonies back than and today definitly not!
      Where is your source!

  • @dontobillo
    @dontobillo หลายเดือนก่อน

    Canary madeira and azores are not colonies

  • @unknownus63
    @unknownus63 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Colonialism still going?

    • @failedbirthcontrol8995
      @failedbirthcontrol8995 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. Western corporations own literal slaves in Africa. It just shifted from states colonising to companies

  • @corneliussulla9963
    @corneliussulla9963 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    spam crap

  • @parrotconservative
    @parrotconservative 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kingdom of Hawaii?

  • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
    @GreatPolishWingedHussars 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is nonsense. Colonialism did not start with the Portuguese and Spanish. Before the Portuguese and Spanish colonial empires, there were long before colonial empires like the Roman Empire! But even before the Roman Empire there were colonial empires like the Persian Empire. But even after the Roman Empire but before the Portuguese and Spanish Empires, there were colonial empires such as the Polish Empire. Because the Ruthenian territories were nothing other than Polish colonies, which were also exploited and settled. So it makes no sense to show the start of colonialism with the Portuguese and Spanish!

    • @Tago-h1b
      @Tago-h1b 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The video starts in the year 1433, so he probably wanted to make the Age of Discovery coincide with the European empires of the Modern Era.

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Tago-h1b But the title of the video contradicts your claim. In addition, errors regarding colonialism were also made after 1433 as I explained in my comment. Furthermore, there was no European colonialism in 1433 caused by discoveries. In fact, the Polish Empire came into being in 1385 with the takeover of Lithuania, making Poland the only European colonial power for over 100 years. By the way, I don't consider the Ottoman Empire to be European, which also became a colonial power like Poland in the 15th century.

    • @Tago-h1b
      @Tago-h1b 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@GreatPolishWingedHussars Don't get upset, I was just trying to give a possible explanation, since the Azores were discovered in 1432-33.
      You will have to ask the author of the video.

    • @GreatPolishWingedHussars
      @GreatPolishWingedHussars 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Tago-h1b Ok, if you want to look at it that way and see the discovery of uninhabited islands like the Azores as colonism, then European colonism began with the settlement of Iceland around the year 1000 by the Vikings. This was their only long-term colonization success because everywhere else their attempts at colonization failed. Well, the islands in the Mediterranean were also uninhabited and were colonized, such as Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica, Cyprus, etc. Then, according to your definition, colonization would actually have begun in the Stone Age, because these islands were colonized by Europeans in the Stone Age.

    • @Tago-h1b
      @Tago-h1b 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@GreatPolishWingedHussars I am not defining anything.
      You should read more carefully.
      In my first comment I name the Age of Discoveries.
      It's an historical era that goes from the 15th to the 17th century and is characterized by explorations by the Portuguese and Spanish, and later by the English, Dutch and French of practically all the oceans and coasts.
      Hence my mention of the Azores as a discovery (1432-33) and the beginning of European overseas colonialism.
      It's the only fact that fits the date.
      Chill out Man.

  • @otreblarotsap1857
    @otreblarotsap1857 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Victoria 2 music!!!

  • @Ant_1488
    @Ant_1488 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The worst think discover Mexico

  • @ferrothorn9022
    @ferrothorn9022 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    European colonialism*

  • @pdecrinis
    @pdecrinis หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russia is still a colonial empire. Why was it wrongly removed as such.

    • @abuser-Milovidov
      @abuser-Milovidov หลายเดือนก่อน

      Какими колониями обладает РФ на сегодняшний день?

  • @wiliboi2662
    @wiliboi2662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video is missing the largest ongoing settler colonial project, Israel.

  • @zdk529
    @zdk529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    800 arab colonisation

  • @slyziober8171
    @slyziober8171 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Technically, Soviet Union was a colonial empire also

    • @abuser-Milovidov
      @abuser-Milovidov หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Нет, конечно. Твои комплексы не делают СССР империей, и уж тем более колониальной.

  • @Royinszki
    @Royinszki 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This should've started with the vikings in north america

    • @yacin5590
      @yacin5590 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No
      Vikings were not colonialists

  • @emil3f
    @emil3f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spain started way before Portugal with the conquest of Lanzarote

    • @emil3f
      @emil3f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also Spain had full control over Spanish Sahara, and there are a lot of errors in the years

    • @emil3f
      @emil3f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also the Canaries are not a colony of Spain

  • @cak76spiral50
    @cak76spiral50 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Почему Россия-монархия здесь колониальная держава?

    • @BJlaDuMuP
      @BJlaDuMuP หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Потому что Россия тоже является колониальной империей хоть и не в полной мере .

    • @cak76spiral50
      @cak76spiral50 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BJlaDuMuP При монархии-когда Государь с прародительского престола самодержавно управлял страной Россия была скорее семьей.Различные народности и племена стремились приобщиться к Великорусскому племени, к его культуре,к его самобытности,и духу. Они все стремились стать подданными белого самодержавного Царя-верховного, защитника государственного права и Господнего глашатая.

    • @BJlaDuMuP
      @BJlaDuMuP หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cak76spiral50 ахахахахахахсхахахаахахахахахах, кавказская война слышали ?))) А может про покорения Волги Иваном грозным ?))) Если нет, то советую , не будете ТАК сильно заблуждаться .

  • @savme37
    @savme37 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Civilised Europe making fun of exploiting people for simple benefits😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @parrotconservative
      @parrotconservative 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The same people that were given education and cities? 🙄

    • @savme37
      @savme37 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@parrotconservative Yeah, that's why Senegal is the most developed country in the whole globe, right?

    • @parrotconservative
      @parrotconservative 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@savme37 that same nation that had a socialist party from 1960’s to the 2000’s and with a genuinely weak government

    • @parrotconservative
      @parrotconservative 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@savme37 Yeah Senegal sure had a fun time being opposed by “Europeans” and definitely not their own loser ideology

  • @goyindi
    @goyindi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    music really sux.