History of the Catholic Church: Every Year(1054-2024)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2024
- This video shows the evolution of the Roman Catholic Church since the Great Schism and of the Eastern Catholic Churches in a more limited manner. Fringe groups not associated with the church, like Sedevacantists, Palmarian Church and Old Catholics are not shown, not being in the church.
This video only shows the Ecclesiastical Provinces and their 'ancestors'. Sui Iuris Missions, Prefectures, Administrations, Vicariates and other pre-diocesan entities are not shown except if they will eventually evolve in a present archdiocese OR if they evolve into a present independent territorial structure (with a couple of easily-documented exceptions). For example, Vicariate of Ghardaia exists today so it is show from the beginning. Vicariate of Mackenzie will eventually evolve into the Archdiocese of Grouard-Mclennan and the associated province so it is shown. Latin American vicariates are not shown before 2000 because of unclear territory. Most of the percentages are from a Catholic perspective so they might not reflect population censuses.
Sources:
Wikipedia
Catholic-Hierarchy.com - used extensively for percentages and evolution of archdioceses (www.catholic-hierarchy.org/di...)
Stanford Digital Atlas of Dioceses and Ecclesiastical Provinces (searchworks.stanford.edu/cata...)
Kayra Atakan's History of Religion in Europe: Every Year ( • History of Religion in... )
Music:
Salva Sancta Parens
Agnus Dei
Parce Domine
Noi Vogliam Dio
Christ is Risen
Addressing some concerns
Why did I start in 1054 since the Catholic Church started in 33 AD?
Simply put: because of the Great Schism. You have to understand that there are at least 3 other churches that claim to have started with Jesus and the Apostle. The Assyrian Church, the Oriental Orthodox and the Eastern Orthodox claim to be the One True Church. Not to mention all the Protestant denominations that claim to restore true Christianity. As I've said before, the debate about the One True Church is for theologians, not historians and this is a history channel. I'm not here to promote the Catholic interpretation of history, but to provide a view that can be accepted by all.
As far as I'm concerned, the Great Church is the ancestor to both Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches and while a divide can be seen between them before the schism, then is the first time they were institutionally separated. Representing them in a video not about specifically early Christianity would give the impression that one separated from the other, an impression I do not want to give, since it would be biased. All in all, when I make the video on the Eastern Orthodox I'll also begin in 1054 so that I'm consistent
Yeah but the church Christ left to Peter, as the clear leader of the flock, has resided in Rome for 10 centuries. So no other church claim to be the one founded by Christ is valid.
@@tothem1997wrong, it’s up for debate since Peter was the Bishop of Antioch before he became bishop of Rome.
@@tothem1997As a Protestant,I do have to say that no human is closer to god than the other. Therefore, the pope is only a man and it is a heresy to claim he could speak in the name of god.
I prefer a church that encourages its members to find their own moral creed instead of having one dictated down by a random man in rome.
@@xballoon4402 every single council, including Florence, that the orthodox recognised, aknowledge the sit of Rome as having primacy over other. Cerularius and his successor claimed that Constantinople had the primacy, well where is Constantinople now ? The gates of hell prevailed against it.
Christ apointed peter as a single leader of the whole flock, no other church than the catholic church has one man as a leader. Antiochus never even claimed to be the leading sit of the Universal church.
Peter, as well as all his accepted successors, were in Rome. Where he died and was buried.
@@fragdoch-nicht1290 protestantism is contrary the principle of non contradiction, the first principle of logic, two contradictory statements cannot be both true. And free interpretation of the scripture will lead every man to his own truth and moral, this is why there is a multitude of protestant sects all disagreeing with each other.
Because as human are limited in will and intelligence they cannot get to the full truth and good on their own means.
Thus only through a special divine assistance, not human assistance, could the truth be preserved from corruption and debate settled through the challenges of History.
God is omniscient, so he knew that, that is why he founded a church, and gave one man leadership over it, and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against it ever, through a special assistance of the holy Ghost, to bind and loose everything on earth and in heaven.
A single error makes a whole story false, so no one can be saved if he does not believe what the one true church proclaims on morals and Dogma.
This special grace pertains only to that purpose, to officialy and clearly proclaimed statements on morals and dogma (and not the political, cultural or personal opinions of the man who holds tha office) by the highest authority of the church: the pope. This corpus of teachings is called the magisterium of the church.
if there is one true God there is thus one truth and one moral, his moral. And he came down on earth to preach that truth and moral.
"Peter you are the rock and on that rock i shall build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it"
"Lead my flock"
dude this is incredible, I have never seen someone do this before. You're so underrated. Could you do other churches next?
Thanks a bunch! I have a video planned on the Eastern Orthodox Church and on the Great Church. It will take a while, my focus is still on countries
@@animalpolitic6925👍
@@animalpolitic6925 nice
@@animalpolitic6925take your time but when do you think the Eastern Orthodox video will come out. I’ve studied countries and Orthodoxy for a few years and I can check anything if you need so.
As someone who is Catholic and loves the History of the Church, I really like this video. Well done.
Happy Easter!!!
Happy easter everyone!
Let's not forget that Easter is just Ostara retrieved by Christianism.
I’m very happy to see that Catholicism is growing in Africa.
The Great Harlot
Thanks to the Belgian handchoppers. Isn't imperialism wonderful?
@Ved000000 Congo was introduced to Catholicism hundreds of years before Belgians even came there
really ignorant comment@@Ved000000
@@ElfinHat96you are not even Christian
Respect catholicism from Bulgarian orthodox, Christ is king ✝️☦️ Christ is risen 🙏🏻✝️☦️
Respect for Orthodoxy from an American Catholic, Christ is King! We are brothers in Christ
Truly He is risen
Criminal gangs of global scale 😍
@@xbirdshorts5075Huh
@@xbirdshorts5075😂
Very nice video
Great job
Very interesting over time. Only thing I'll bring up is the spelling "Sidney" for Sydney (4:02)- I don't know if this is a typo or an obscure Catholic spelling of the city's name because I'm Australian and I've never seen that spelling.
That's how it is written in Spanish, maybe the author of the video comes from a Spanish speaking country
Yeah, it was a typo
Catholic Church was since 33AD and St. Peter was the first pope. Term "Catholic Church" was first time used in 110AD by St. Ignatius of Antioch in his letter to Smyrnaeans.
That’s like Baptists saying they’re biblical because of St. John the Baptist
@@JustinianRomanov no it's not, even pre-Orthodox Eastern rite before schism recognized Pope. After the separation Orthodoxs try to avoid this fact. Not to mention that there is no "Universal Church" in Orthodox Church because many churches are not in communion with each other. Before schism we were all united. Is the St.Peter first pope? Which church still have the pope?
@@Yamato980 You do realize that we have no opposition to the existence of the Pope in the first millennium, right? Also, before the Patriarchate of Rome was established, Jerusalem (St. James the Greater), Antioch (St. Peter), Alexandria (St. Mark), and Byzantium (St. Andrew, later Constantinople) were established. The ancient Church is still united in theology and through the first four Patriarchies. Rome doesn’t even have unified theology, as the Latin Rite theology is wildly different than the 22 Eastern Rite churches which range from Orthodoxy, Monophytism, and Nestorianism
@@JustinianRomanov Orthodox accepted primacy of the Pope in first millennium which means they rejected their own tradition after the schism. Some of churches you mentioned are heretical and you can only have on truth not many truths and not many churches but one. Orthodox churches are ethno-national churches highly dependable by their secular governments. Orthodox separated from Catholic Church because Constantinople Patriarch prideful Michael Cerularius and his blasphemous acts against Latin Eucharist.
@@JustinianRomanovyou accepted primacy of the Pope in first millennium which makes that Orthodox abandoned their own tradition. Orthodox Churches are not unified and in essence they are ethno-national churches dependable on secular governments of given nations. That's how Orthodox churches came into existence, because Constantinople wanted the influence of Rome. There are Orthodox Churches with different communions with each other and many are In direct conflict. You cannot have many truths and churches but only one truth and one Church. Very schism happened because selfish and prideful Patriarch of Constantinople Michael Cerularius who committed blasphemous acts against Latin Eucharist (He gave order that Eucharist from Latin churches to be thrown on the streets)and tried to kill Latin prelates. Later he wanted to make himself emperor.There was never large scale excommunication between Catholic and Orthodox Churches, only Michael Cerularius and his immediate clergy were excommunicated. Unfortunately the rest of eastern clergy joined in separation from Catholic Church. How much councils Orthodox Church had, and when was the last one? It simply shows how unified and in agreement they are, they cannot agree with each other which means they are not one Church.
History of the Orthodox Church next!
Incredible
Excelent
Ca intotdeauna munca excelenta, personal m-ar fi interesat mai mult un video similar despre Biserica Ortodoxa.
Merci mult! Se face si cel pe Biserica Ortodoxa, dar dupa ceva timp si intr-o forma mai limitata. Spre deosebire de Biserica Catolica, ortodocsii nu tin statistici clare de-a lungul timpului sau granite clare ale provinciilor (in Biserica Ortodoxa echivalentul e mitropolia), asa ca va fi mai general
Is this just French but with no accents?
Oh Romanian
Why
Why you started only in 1054 ? Just because of the schism ?
What other reason?
@@Mattt5but orthodox split from the Catholics because we have popes going way back before 1054
@@therealmasterchief4644and we have bishops going back before 1054, what’s your point? We orthodox split from you guys but I want to ask you, why? It’s because of you guys heresies of Papal Infallibility and Filioque
@@xballoon4402Filioque is not really a point of contention, the underlying theology is the same just worded differently according to both Orthodox and Catholic priests. From what I understand its the Holy Spirit proceeding from the father and from the Father through the Son
I have heard that the average layman at the time weren’t even aware of the schism and on the local level still had communion with each other for awhile
Do one for the Orthodox Church also
It's coming, even though not right away
Why Mogilev is so big. Its just a city in Belarus. Was it the centre of catholicism in russian empire?
Basically yes. Catherine the Great established an archdiocese for the Catholics in her country, with the seat being at Mogilev. It was recognized by the pope not much later. Since Catholicism was almost non-existent in the Russian Empire and the hierarchy was further curbed during the soviet era, it remained in place in that form until the 1990s
@@animalpolitic6925Catholic Laity was attacked during the Russian empire and later
Why not from the year 33?
Too hard to track statistics from that era.
Considering the start date they chose instead and the fact they've made more videos about Romania than any other country, my guess would be that the guy behind the channel is Eastern Orthodox.
@@sk00k that would explain
Cuz that’s reserved for the Orthodox Church
@@joao.fenix1473 It's a shame them and other Protestants don't realize the truth
Problem with this is that it does not take into account things like mass attendance and belief in transubstantion. Many people are “catholic” but rarely go to mass outside Easter and Christmas
Or are like Joe Biden and directly fund people involved in mortally sinful activities like Abortion
The Catholic Church started in 33 AD, Matthew 16: 18-19✝
Ești catolic man?
Interesting how Catholicism is growing slowly in Africa, it's also interesting that the Philippines is the only Catholics in Asia, and why does everyone not understand that he started in 1054 because of the schism?
Hello. Medieval Montenegro even in the interior was mostly catholic until the 15th century, with many tribes being catholic until the early 18th century.
Vivat Christus Rex✝️, greetings from Serbia.
Council of florence?
Not certain on Sweden being so Catholic in the 11th and 12th centuries, there are records of the pagan temple at Uppsala and other organised practices going on until the early 1100s, there seeks to have been a decent sized heathen minority there for a while. Great video though, thanks for putting it together
Tengrism next?
this is a minor thing map wise but you missed japan
Was it ever more than 10% ?
@@Mattt5 Nominally there were 300,000 at it's height. That is, there was forced conversion under some warlords in the south. Although I don't know what that would look like on a map.
My source is: Christs Samurai
Appart from it I have not studied this, take that as you will.
BenedictXIII?
why no uniate churches?
It’s what we hope to do in the future
@@xballoon4402 it was
I like how colonial empires essentially destroyed Catholicism in the Kongo for a while. 4:14
Philipines is a white elephant in the room. Guess i will search more about my brothers there... i think that, by the modernism society that is brought into Brazil since 80s, maybe philipines could be the next bigger catholic country in the world, also the most dense catholic population. I can't believe around 10% of brazilian catholics go to mass weekly, also 45% of brazilian catholics vote for communists parties. This worries me a lot as brazilian myself.
The one true church 🙏
As a catholic myself from South América, I love this video intention and I like the edition as the effort.
However, it's very "latin-centric" and only appeared the non Latín Catholic Church (like Eastern Catholics) since Age of Discovery.
In an Apostolic Sacred Tradition and Apostolical Succession point of view, there was One Catholic Church funded by Jesuschrist. So, all Christian Communities (like Greeks, Armenians, Eastern slavs, Egyptians, Nubians, Ethiopians, Assyrians, Arabs, etc) outside Western Europe were part of Catholic Church until Schisms happened (like Coptics miaphysists or Orient nestorians refusing Conciliar decisitions, or Orthodox refusing Papal authority, etc).
Those non-Latin catholics weren't under lithurgical authority of Roman See, but were in communion with Roman See and recognised Primacy of Saint Peter as Prince of the Apostle.
I don't want to start a theological debate against Orthodox primus ínter pares or Protestant Sola Scriptura and a lot of Historiographical controversies about Primitive Christians and Medieval Church. Btw, I'm not a defender of those Conciliarist theologies or Hirtorical Skepticism against Papal Supremacy. However, it's a fact that all were part of a Same and One Catholic Church, in communion with Rome.
Many thanks for commenting! That is the Catholic perspective, indeed. However, there are many people that do not agree with it and for the video to be fair, it had to respect those beliefs. We can argue about what is the One True Church, but that is purview of theologians, not historians. I feel like portraying the Catholic Church as beginning with Jesus and the Apostles would impose that belief on viewers that do not agree with it and I would treat the Eastern Orthodox the same way, beginning in 1054. As for Eastern Catholics, you're right that this video does not do them justice, but it kind of had to be that way since their administrations overlap with the Latin Church
@@animalpolitic6925 If I had made the video, I would have said, for example, Coptic Catholics were in communion with the Catholic Church in Egypt-Nubia-Ethiopia until the 5th century (which is a true historical fact) as "Coptic Catholics." And then re-appear as Coptic Catholic minorities in 1741, when the Coptic Archbishop of Jerusalem, Anastasius, converted to Catholicism and Pope Benedict XIV (1740-1758) established an apostolic vicariate for Coptic Catholics. Similar case with the Orthodox until 1054 being Greek Catholics in communion with the same church, and then being reduced to minorities.
And then, if you made a "History of the Orthodox Church" video, it would show that there was communion between Western and Eastern Christians until 1054, and show us Catholics as "Western Orthodox" and being reduced as minorities after the schism. It would be a historical compromise between both historiographys as those are historical facts, both were the same church in a time, due to Apostolic Tradition.
@@animalpolitic6925You’re not imposing anything on anyone if you state truthful facts. The Catholic Church was started by Jesus Christ in 33 A.D, and the Church was always called catholic to begin with. The orthodox Church started after the schism, but originally before the schism it used to be greek/eastern catholic Church. Now, as a historian you shouldn’t care if other people get offended, because a historian always potrays factual and truthful information. This liberal culture about “getting offended” ruined the world
I do not believe this ' statistics'. There were no bureau of statistics for many centuries. I not believe this
do you have discord?
yes I do
Need to solve the schism 😔
Spain carrying
the disease
I'm Christian in Korea.
It's all downhill from here, at least in Europe
Although Catholicism and Orthodoxy separated a long time ago and sometimes Catholics and Orthodox fight among themselves, we are still all Christians, and therefore, we must fight together against the only enemy we have in common: Islam!!!! Long live Christ our lord and emperor!!!! ✝️☦️🇻🇦⛪
You can recognize the unity between Catholics and Orthodoxy but please be careful not to follow into religious indifferentism
Why did you start in the 1000s? The Catholic Church is so much older than that😂
Nope, the Orthodox Church was the one in existence before the Roman Catholics split
No the Western Catholic Church began un 1054
@@GeorgiosLeo so did the Orthodox Church ever have Popes, because there were Popes before 1054 lol.
@therealmasterchief4644 what we call Eastern Orthodox Church did began in 1054 jus like the Western Church but what the claim is that the Orthodox Church hasn't changed a bit from the pre Schism Church but the Western Catholic Church has.
The celibacy of the priests for example is a very significant change.
@@GeorgiosLeo except like I said before, the Catholic Church had Popes before 1054. The Orthodox Church rejected the Pope in 1054. The Catholic Church didn’t change, the Orthodox Church changed by rejecting the Pope after 1000 years of excepting him.
Ulster is not depicted correctly.
Good catch
Lets be real its not that red becuse mist of them are atheists 😅
Kinda. Indeed, this map is mostly based on the Catholic Church's stats, so it likely tracks baptized people within their records, not self-described or practicing Catholics
Belize,Guyana and Jamaica were British colonies so they wouldn't be Catholic but Protestant.