วีดีโอ

No, this IS the BEST video of the United States history!

The rest of the non-European humans were lucky to know more than one subcontinent.

They committed many atrocities, but werent colonial

What stopped them then?

The Aztec Empire would never have bowed to another religion.

That would be impossible, you still don't understand the cult that was surrendered to Huitzilopochtli. The Nahua religion would have been incompatible with Islam. Don't even dream about it.

Basically yes. Catherine the Great established an archdiocese for the Catholics in her country, with the seat being at Mogilev. It was recognized by the pope not much later. Since Catholicism was almost non-existent in the Russian Empire and the hierarchy was further curbed during the soviet era, it remained in place in that form until the 1990s

Kinda. Indeed, this map is mostly based on the Catholic Church's stats, so it likely tracks baptized people within their records, not self-described or practicing Catholics

Or are like Joe Biden and directly fund people involved in mortally sinful activities like Abortion

It's coming, even though not right away

Gotta be light red now

If only I hadn't mentioned in the video itself not to take the statistics as definitive before 1950, since they are estimates and/or guesses. Also keep in mind that these track the numbers of baptized people, not self-identification (that's why Latin America switches so fast - mass conversions). I'm not sure what you mean about Northern Europe, it's clearly the palest red. The deep red you see there must be Poland, which remains strongly Catholic

It’s what we hope to do in the future

@@xballoon4402 it was

You can recognize the unity between Catholics and Orthodoxy but please be careful not to follow into religious indifferentism

the disease

That’s like Baptists saying they’re biblical because of St. John the Baptist

@@JustinianRomanov no it's not, even pre-Orthodox Eastern rite before schism recognized Pope. After the separation Orthodoxs try to avoid this fact. Not to mention that there is no "Universal Church" in Orthodox Church because many churches are not in communion with each other. Before schism we were all united. Is the St.Peter first pope? Which church still have the pope?

@@Yamato980 You do realize that we have no opposition to the existence of the Pope in the first millennium, right? Also, before the Patriarchate of Rome was established, Jerusalem (St. James the Greater), Antioch (St. Peter), Alexandria (St. Mark), and Byzantium (St. Andrew, later Constantinople) were established. The ancient Church is still united in theology and through the first four Patriarchies. Rome doesn’t even have unified theology, as the Latin Rite theology is wildly different than the 22 Eastern Rite churches which range from Orthodoxy, Monophytism, and Nestorianism

@@JustinianRomanov Orthodox accepted primacy of the Pope in first millennium which means they rejected their own tradition after the schism. Some of churches you mentioned are heretical and you can only have on truth not many truths and not many churches but one. Orthodox churches are ethno-national churches highly dependable by their secular governments. Orthodox separated from Catholic Church because Constantinople Patriarch prideful Michael Cerularius and his blasphemous acts against Latin Eucharist.

​​​​​​​@@JustinianRomanovyou accepted primacy of the Pope in first millennium which makes that Orthodox abandoned their own tradition. Orthodox Churches are not unified and in essence they are ethno-national churches dependable on secular governments of given nations. That's how Orthodox churches came into existence, because Constantinople wanted the influence of Rome. There are Orthodox Churches with different communions with each other and many are In direct conflict. You cannot have many truths and churches but only one truth and one Church. Very schism happened because selfish and prideful Patriarch of Constantinople Michael Cerularius who committed blasphemous acts against Latin Eucharist (He gave order that Eucharist from Latin churches to be thrown on the streets)and tried to kill Latin prelates. Later he wanted to make himself emperor.There was never large scale excommunication between Catholic and Orthodox Churches, only Michael Cerularius and his immediate clergy were excommunicated. Unfortunately the rest of eastern clergy joined in separation from Catholic Church. How much councils Orthodox Church had, and when was the last one? It simply shows how unified and in agreement they are, they cannot agree with each other which means they are not one Church.

Yeah but the church Christ left to Peter, as the clear leader of the flock, has resided in Rome for 10 centuries. So no other church claim to be the one founded by Christ is valid.

@@tothem1997wrong, it’s up for debate since Peter was the Bishop of Antioch before he became bishop of Rome.

​@@tothem1997As a Protestant,I do have to say that no human is closer to god than the other. Therefore, the pope is only a man and it is a heresy to claim he could speak in the name of god. I prefer a church that encourages its members to find their own moral creed instead of having one dictated down by a random man in rome.

@@xballoon4402 every single council, including Florence, that the orthodox recognised, aknowledge the sit of Rome as having primacy over other. Cerularius and his successor claimed that Constantinople had the primacy, well where is Constantinople now ? The gates of hell prevailed against it. Christ apointed peter as a single leader of the whole flock, no other church than the catholic church has one man as a leader. Antiochus never even claimed to be the leading sit of the Universal church. Peter, as well as all his accepted successors, were in Rome. Where he died and was buried.

@@fragdoch-nicht1290 protestantism is contrary the principle of non contradiction, the first principle of logic, two contradictory statements cannot be both true. And free interpretation of the scripture will lead every man to his own truth and moral, this is why there is a multitude of protestant sects all disagreeing with each other. Because as human are limited in will and intelligence they cannot get to the full truth and good on their own means. Thus only through a special divine assistance, not human assistance, could the truth be preserved from corruption and debate settled through the challenges of History. God is omniscient, so he knew that, that is why he founded a church, and gave one man leadership over it, and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against it ever, through a special assistance of the holy Ghost, to bind and loose everything on earth and in heaven. A single error makes a whole story false, so no one can be saved if he does not believe what the one true church proclaims on morals and Dogma. This special grace pertains only to that purpose, to officialy and clearly proclaimed statements on morals and dogma (and not the political, cultural or personal opinions of the man who holds tha office) by the highest authority of the church: the pope. This corpus of teachings is called the magisterium of the church. if there is one true God there is thus one truth and one moral, his moral. And he came down on earth to preach that truth and moral. "Peter you are the rock and on that rock i shall build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" "Lead my flock"

Nope, the Orthodox Church was the one in existence before the Roman Catholics split

No the Western Catholic Church began un 1054

@@GeorgiosLeo so did the Orthodox Church ever have Popes, because there were Popes before 1054 lol.

@therealmasterchief4644 what we call Eastern Orthodox Church did began in 1054 jus like the Western Church but what the claim is that the Orthodox Church hasn't changed a bit from the pre Schism Church but the Western Catholic Church has. The celibacy of the priests for example is a very significant change.

@@GeorgiosLeo except like I said before, the Catholic Church had Popes before 1054. The Orthodox Church rejected the Pope in 1054. The Catholic Church didn’t change, the Orthodox Church changed by rejecting the Pope after 1000 years of excepting him.

The Great Harlot

Good catch

Was it ever more than 10% ?

@@Mattt5 Nominally there were 300,000 at it's height. That is, there was forced conversion under some warlords in the south. Although I don't know what that would look like on a map. My source is: Christs Samurai Appart from it I have not studied this, take that as you will.

Respect for Orthodoxy from an American Catholic, Christ is King! We are brothers in Christ

Truly He is risen

Criminal gangs of global scale 😍

​@@xbirdshorts5075Huh

​@@xbirdshorts5075😂

That's how it is written in Spanish, maybe the author of the video comes from a Spanish speaking country

Yeah, it was a typo

What other reason?

@@Mattt5but orthodox split from the Catholics because we have popes going way back before 1054

@@therealmasterchief4644and we have bishops going back before 1054, what’s your point? We orthodox split from you guys but I want to ask you, why? It’s because of you guys heresies of Papal Infallibility and Filioque

@@xballoon4402Filioque is not really a point of contention, the underlying theology is the same just worded differently according to both Orthodox and Catholic priests. From what I understand its the Holy Spirit proceeding from the father and from the Father through the Son

I have heard that the average layman at the time weren’t even aware of the schism and on the local level still had communion with each other for awhile

Too hard to track statistics from that era.

Considering the start date they chose instead and the fact they've made more videos about Romania than any other country, my guess would be that the guy behind the channel is Eastern Orthodox.

@@sk00k that would explain

Cuz that’s reserved for the Orthodox Church

@@joao.fenix1473 It's a shame them and other Protestants don't realize the truth