@@bababoeydude8197 I think these „value bikes“ are definitely up to the task of riding a pro line. Nothing like 20 meters hucked to flat but that’s not what they’re designed for. They’re Trail bikes and I think they can sure handle a technical double black diamond trail without ridiculous jumps.
It's interesting that the "most active bike" had the best climbing performance here. Goes to show you that a high anti-squat isn't everything, especially if you're climbing in the PNW. The trend has been towards stiff and progressive bikes lately but there's a strong argument to be made for more active suspension, especially if you aren't racing or hunting KOMs.
I was going to argue that 'best climbing performance' is more complicated than being able to more easily traverse difficult terrain. But a better ability to even REACH the top is obviously key. To finish first, first you must finish. I tend to think of climbing as either efficient or not. But you're right.
The Trance X winning makes sense. Active suspension bikes are the best for climbing junky, technical sections because they find traction and hep you keep your footing. Climbing on xc ski trails or roads and climbing on tech should honestly be two different categories. Personally I don’t care how a bike climbs on fire roads because I don’t do boring climbs. I always take the bike trail up.
they always give strange reviews to Giant bikes :D however, it's been like the second time Giant wins impossible climbs kek with it's "active" suspension, so go figure
I think on smooth terrain, a HT or locked out would better, such as on a fire road. But a technical climb like that the rear would track better with full squish. Of course rider skill is important too.
I'm faster at climbing with my FS and never lockout. Hardtail is only faster on super smooth trails and even then it's not very noticeable. FS bikes have gotten way more efficient these days.
Good test. But this is why I prefer a triple crank with a little granny ring. One can crawl up slowly with loads of torque. 27 gears are the business...;-)
Pretty much what I was thinking. Given that my local area features many goat climbs which I tackle with my half-ton 3x7 bike, I'm in no hurry to 'upgrade' to any 1x setup. In fact, I might yet get a good old Megarange just to be sure!
@@spiffpilot2589 I realise quite a few gears are redundant: 7th on the granny ring, and 1st on the big ring are practically inaccessible on mine, just for a start; quite a few are near enough duplicated too. Less weight, less bits to go wrong...I get all that, but... I drove trucks for a living, I know equally well there's no substitute for dropping down gears and keeping the engine in the sweet spot. In this case, the engine is of course, me, and I find I have better traction control with more options. The least I can see myself doing is a 2x.
I have a ten speed that came on a bike I bought. The low gear is not low enough. The high gear, the peddles top out at about 24 mph. And is frustrating downhill. It is only 300 gram or so lighter than my XT triple set up. Me old marin quad Tara crawls up narly trails with ease. Maybe a 12 or 13 speed would be an improvement on the mid range 10 I have. But personally, not impressed with 1X systems. In Yorkshire. There are hills. Lots of hills. Often the 10 speed has me walking up hill. The marin never lets me down. And for riding all day. The triple, covers everything.
@@geraldmaybebaby1585 100% hear you. I know the hills of Yorks, Lancs and the Peaks from my truck driving days! Up here in Fife is a good bit flatter, but the climbs are often violently steep, on thick grass and slimy clay, so I'm happy to stick with my 'too many' gears! Besides that, old tech is cheaper and I can always lob on the old MegaRange set...51t ftw, ten minute job. Mine tops out about 21mph which is a pain in the arse on road, and the frame's stable up to 30. More gears please!
@@bananasstuff3344 yes, but are also a consumable which will wear out and/or might be swapped even at the point of sale (at least for LBS purchases). Tires are also region specific: a tire that might work great in Sedona or SoCal might be weak in Squamish and v/v. This is why tests - imho correctly - often go with control tires. Yes, this is called a value bike comparison, but with prices varying 50% to...250%, i think results are skewed. If we were talking a much stricter price variation having "just" $1200 ΗΤs +/- 10%, yes, what is OEM is important, but if I was to buy a Ripley AF and whatnot, I'd probably swap a tire to work with the area/season I'm working with. What we saw here was pretty much enduro rear tires beating faster rolling trail & XC tires over wet roots.
@@bananasstuff3344 overall I agree, the field test was informative. But if you go through it, you will see the disparity: e.g. nowhere in their casual discussion was the Trance X or the Rift Zone or the Growler the "above average pedallers" etc, perhaps to an extend exactly because those came with the "more enduro" / knobbier/meatier rear tires, which ofc are a pain to pedal with all-day, but would give you the edge @ rougher / technical short climbs. I don't try to invalidate the overall review, just the specific technical climb part that is too much tire dependant.
@@dtolios pretty sure they said the rift zone had a lot of xc roots and was super efficient. Makes sense it did so well. Plus the tires that come on that bike are slow as hell, if anything the tires were a disadvantage to it.
I feel like these videos need atleast 3, 4, 5, heck who knows how many more riders of differing abilities to actually be definitive in any way shape or form. I mean heck, we've all tried that same technical climb with the same bike back to back and not made it, then made it, then not made it....
@@spiffpilot2589 picking winners and losers with a variety of bikes and brands and making a video out of it for "fun" doesn't compute with me I guess...
Question... Just started riding trail/DH bikes last years, still learning from it and having a blast at same time, my question is: Why don't you get off the seat to pedal uphill??? I've been doing it and it feels that I have more "power" and control/balance if I do it... Is that not the right thing to do? And if so, why? Thanks
In technical bits, for short periods, standing is better to actually get up, but it's overall more energy efficient to climb while seated; it depends on the situation. I agree tho, I would probably be standing for this segment.
This specific section makes no sense to me to be seated, rear tire grip isn't going to be an issue here, I bet had she stood up she would have made it to the top with every bike, just my opinion tho
@@George-je1fs strongly disagree. She would have been kicking dirt with that rear tire. She even mentioned at one point that she weighted the front tire and lost rear grip
I bet they're making Mike Levy do the huck to flats on the hardtails as punishment lol edit: and maybe they might take away his mic privileges during that shoot?
"Do any climbs favor hard tails?" Anything more than a smooth surface and a full suspension wins, I don't know how pro XC racers use hard tails on the gnarly courses they have to race now. I learned the misconception of "hard tails climb better because more power gets to the tire." True, right up until the rear tire hits literally anything. Root, Rock, slight bump in the dirt, anything that can ram into the tire makes the bike stop dead, any bump in the trail bounces you off the seat, they're a bitch to use for climbs.
I feel like I do this a lot. I'm tired during the first 3 minutes of climbing then after that I can climb up anything. Anyone else get second winds like this?
Why do I feel like they're climbing terribly. I get the wet dirt though, but I feel the power strokes are so badly used and the line choice isn't the bike's fault.
She is also looking down at her front wheel the whole climb instead of slightly more forward, not saying she isn't a good climber, but I don't think it's a fair comparison because the bikes can likely climb much better than she may feel comfortable with. No hate though, the video is fun and I'm glad they did it!
@@slowspoke1027 I agree witht he same arguments. For the grawler to climb that well, the giant named first and the XC-ish Norco and BMC being so far apart goes to show how they literally cared only off of grip (tires) and handling (short stem).
@@ZhengZL69 I have a growler and I can guarantee I'd be much better at climbing on literally any other steeper angled hardtail, I've only ridden one other bike uphill so far but the difference in climb performance is ultimately down to how skilled you are as a rider. All this said, it's still fair to make said video because it has some value; the tires and setups of the bikes do matter quite a bit for harder technical climbing, and having a slightly less skilled rider hosting the videos helps to demonstrate how the average rider is likely to handle the bikes on a climb. Mike is an extremely proficient rider, and it's fair to say he'd likely be able to do this specific climb a bit easier than she managed to. However without being there and trying that climb yourself it's hard to make judgements, seeing as it may be much trickier than video makes it seem 😃 P.S. I want to emphasize that nobody should be hating on her climbing techniques, everyone is out there trying to have a good time, and I'm sure she was trying hard to make it up those climbs. I do feel that it would maybe have been interesting to have them do 5 tries on each bike to see if she could have learned the climb lines a bit better on each frame before moving to the next one, since it's easy to hit one root and be tossed (and that isn't a fair judgement of the bikes performance).
@@spiffpilot2589 Based on the tests. The Norco and the BMC paired with a DH casing tire, 10 psi and +25% sag would've crushed it. Not her fault, I'm just saying that this video is unfair (just like most Impossible Climb PB videos).
@@bimmermac DCA, or DoubleCrownAddict, is a pinkbike user known for being constantly downvoted because of his moronic views. Some of the highlights of these views are that ebikes are better than outdated "analog" bikes, derailleurs are very dangerous and must be replaced by gearboxes, YT, the bike brand, are nazi Trumpists
Great climbing reveiw from you Sarah. Wtf is Levy doing to that innocent tree in the intro. That is not how you become one with the forrest. Fortunately we have Sarah to wash out that memory MIKE 😠🤘.
@@George-je1fs I was very satisfied with my inspection, maintenance and service, had no problems. I had personally brought my bike to yt, a 2 hour drive by car😁😜
No offense to Sarah but I think this trial depends more on Skill than the bikes. Although, having rear suspension is an advantage ( helps generate more traction) choosing the smoother line is probably the priority. It also depends on the person's physical traits, meaning, one person may perform better on another bike and vice versa. I would probably have some issues myself with that climb - it seems like there is a rock garden among root, etc. which I know can be a pain! The Ripley should've surpassed the Marin and Giant. It has a reputation for being one of, if not, the best climber on the market!
The ibis had pretty much all around poor performance this entire test, along with the latest video showing the tire literally contacts the frame at bottom out, not even sure how a legitimate bike company makes a mistake like that. At the beginning of the test I totally thought the ibis was the best and wanted that one. I'd far rather go with the trance, Marshall, or rift zone over the Ripley now. Ibis needs to put in some more work before releasing their next bike.
TH-cam now charges channels for everytime they say a curse word or other "inappropriate" word, even if they bleep it. Known as the Censorship Charge, they didn't officially announce the amount and it sounds like they charge larger channels higher amounts, but some are saying it's usually at least $50/word. And if you aren't approved for ads, they just straight charge you instead of withholding your income.
@@carterbetteridge9259 someone apparently released like a ten minute video of just pure swearing and TH-cam may try to charge them over $1M. Kinda ridiculous.
Sarah just giggling up the impossible climb. Love it.
Sarah laughing constantly as she suffers, with her constant smile and laughing I am thinking there's not much that gets her upset.
When are you guys going to do the "Impossible decent". Taking value bikes and riding rampage lines. Whichever bike doesn't get you hurt is the best.
good idea!
you want them to die?
I think that riding pro lines on value bikes isnt a risk anyone is willing to make.
@@bababoeydude8197 I think these „value bikes“ are definitely up to the task of riding a pro line.
Nothing like 20 meters hucked to flat but that’s not what they’re designed for.
They’re Trail bikes and I think they can sure handle a technical double black diamond trail without ridiculous jumps.
@@bababoeydude8197 you don't need to beat a downhill bike time, you only need to prove which one is the best at going down tricky terrain
It's interesting that the "most active bike" had the best climbing performance here. Goes to show you that a high anti-squat isn't everything, especially if you're climbing in the PNW. The trend has been towards stiff and progressive bikes lately but there's a strong argument to be made for more active suspension, especially if you aren't racing or hunting KOMs.
My Trance X is the fastest bike I’ve owned, uphill and downhill
I was going to argue that 'best climbing performance' is more complicated than being able to more easily traverse difficult terrain. But a better ability to even REACH the top is obviously key.
To finish first, first you must finish.
I tend to think of climbing as either efficient or not. But you're right.
I have a giant trance 29 from last year and it’s fast both ways
“It levels out here a little bit...” *still looks like she’s walking up a stair case...*
Uncensored laughing machine, great Sarah!!!
Love this.
Seeing other people struggle makes me feel better about my pathetic attempts at climbing :)
Mike needs to be there !!
This is the most fun I ever had on a impossible climb!
This makes me feel better, I thought I was the only one having to walk up trails
Hey pinkbike! Do a challenge where Sarah, tom, and levy have only $2500 to spend on a second hand bike and do challenges on them.
I love my Trance X 3! Well rounded bike that can do everything great
As a new rider to clips the most impressive things about these tests is how no one ever falls over. How the hell do you do it?
The Trance is a goat! Great vid Sarah 🤙🏻
These are the vids that I like... 👊🙃
On anything that isn't smooth, climbing a hardtail is harder and debatedly less efficient.
The Trance X winning makes sense. Active suspension bikes are the best for climbing junky, technical sections because they find traction and hep you keep your footing. Climbing on xc ski trails or roads and climbing on tech should honestly be two different categories. Personally I don’t care how a bike climbs on fire roads because I don’t do boring climbs. I always take the bike trail up.
She is literally an angle that rides bikes. We need more people like Sarah
right angle?
@@VaylorTan acute
Sarah is a welcomed breathe of arctic fresh air. so chill knowledgeable and fun! she makes the pinkbike podcasts super cool 😎 🏄♀️ 🤙🏼
Rift Zone for the win
they always give strange reviews to Giant bikes :D however, it's been like the second time Giant wins impossible climbs kek
with it's "active" suspension, so go figure
You guys always have so much fun at impossible climbs! 👏👏💪
Looks remarkably like a learning curve..
Plus a bit of exhaustion
With lockout switches etc, I guess I just assumed that all climbs were better suited to hardtails. Is that way off?
I think on smooth terrain, a HT or locked out would better, such as on a fire road. But a technical climb like that the rear would track better with full squish. Of course rider skill is important too.
I'm faster at climbing with my FS and never lockout. Hardtail is only faster on super smooth trails and even then it's not very noticeable. FS bikes have gotten way more efficient these days.
Sarah uses the Peter Pan Method - "You just gotta believe!" Good stuff, Sarah!
Good test. But this is why I prefer a triple crank with a little granny ring. One can crawl up slowly with loads of torque. 27 gears are the business...;-)
Pretty much what I was thinking. Given that my local area features many goat climbs which I tackle with my half-ton 3x7 bike, I'm in no hurry to 'upgrade' to any 1x setup. In fact, I might yet get a good old Megarange just to be sure!
@@spiffpilot2589 I realise quite a few gears are redundant: 7th on the granny ring, and 1st on the big ring are practically inaccessible on mine, just for a start; quite a few are near enough duplicated too. Less weight, less bits to go wrong...I get all that, but...
I drove trucks for a living, I know equally well there's no substitute for dropping down gears and keeping the engine in the sweet spot. In this case, the engine is of course, me, and I find I have better traction control with more options. The least I can see myself doing is a 2x.
With 1x12 you're getting even lower gears then 3x8, plus less weight. And at a certain point you spin too fast and loose traction anyway.
I have a ten speed that came on a bike I bought. The low gear is not low enough. The high gear, the peddles top out at about 24 mph. And is frustrating downhill. It is only 300 gram or so lighter than my XT triple set up. Me old marin quad Tara crawls up narly trails with ease.
Maybe a 12 or 13 speed would be an improvement on the mid range 10 I have. But personally, not impressed with 1X systems. In Yorkshire. There are hills. Lots of hills. Often the 10 speed has me walking up hill. The marin never lets me down. And for riding all day. The triple, covers everything.
@@geraldmaybebaby1585 100% hear you. I know the hills of Yorks, Lancs and the Peaks from my truck driving days! Up here in Fife is a good bit flatter, but the climbs are often violently steep, on thick grass and slimy clay, so I'm happy to stick with my 'too many' gears! Besides that, old tech is cheaper and I can always lob on the old MegaRange set...51t ftw, ten minute job.
Mine tops out about 21mph which is a pain in the arse on road, and the frame's stable up to 30. More gears please!
Fun watch, but probably was more of a OEM tire spec contest than bike contest per se.
The OEM tires are part of the bike...
@@bananasstuff3344 yes, but are also a consumable which will wear out and/or might be swapped even at the point of sale (at least for LBS purchases). Tires are also region specific: a tire that might work great in Sedona or SoCal might be weak in Squamish and v/v. This is why tests - imho correctly - often go with control tires. Yes, this is called a value bike comparison, but with prices varying 50% to...250%, i think results are skewed. If we were talking a much stricter price variation having "just" $1200 ΗΤs +/- 10%, yes, what is OEM is important, but if I was to buy a Ripley AF and whatnot, I'd probably swap a tire to work with the area/season I'm working with.
What we saw here was pretty much enduro rear tires beating faster rolling trail & XC tires over wet roots.
@@dtolios I'd still say that it was a review of the bike.
@@bananasstuff3344 overall I agree, the field test was informative. But if you go through it, you will see the disparity: e.g. nowhere in their casual discussion was the Trance X or the Rift Zone or the Growler the "above average pedallers" etc, perhaps to an extend exactly because those came with the "more enduro" / knobbier/meatier rear tires, which ofc are a pain to pedal with all-day, but would give you the edge @ rougher / technical short climbs.
I don't try to invalidate the overall review, just the specific technical climb part that is too much tire dependant.
@@dtolios pretty sure they said the rift zone had a lot of xc roots and was super efficient. Makes sense it did so well. Plus the tires that come on that bike are slow as hell, if anything the tires were a disadvantage to it.
Yessss Sarah! You are my favourite PB presenter! Just lovely. And strong 💪 Well played 👏
Pinkbike: impossible
Danny Macaskill: hold my red bull :P
I feel like these videos need atleast 3, 4, 5, heck who knows how many more riders of differing abilities to actually be definitive in any way shape or form. I mean heck, we've all tried that same technical climb with the same bike back to back and not made it, then made it, then not made it....
@@spiffpilot2589 picking winners and losers with a variety of bikes and brands and making a video out of it for "fun" doesn't compute with me I guess...
Question... Just started riding trail/DH bikes last years, still learning from it and having a blast at same time, my question is: Why don't you get off the seat to pedal uphill??? I've been doing it and it feels that I have more "power" and control/balance if I do it... Is that not the right thing to do? And if so, why? Thanks
Thinking the exact same thing
Rear tire grip will be greatly compromised if you get out of the saddle.
In technical bits, for short periods, standing is better to actually get up, but it's overall more energy efficient to climb while seated; it depends on the situation. I agree tho, I would probably be standing for this segment.
This specific section makes no sense to me to be seated, rear tire grip isn't going to be an issue here, I bet had she stood up she would have made it to the top with every bike, just my opinion tho
@@George-je1fs strongly disagree. She would have been kicking dirt with that rear tire. She even mentioned at one point that she weighted the front tire and lost rear grip
What is surprise!, i was thinking hardtails climbing better than f-s
hate those uphill crashes!
you should do the next impossible climb at the woodlot. The start of the climb is pretty much a creek bed and almost impossible.
Omg yeah, I hate that part of woodlot 😅 gotta start the day off with a walk up that
I bet they're making Mike Levy do the huck to flats on the hardtails as punishment lol
edit: and maybe they might take away his mic privileges during that shoot?
Does anyone know the intro song?
Can you include a Motobecane bike from Bikes Direct in one of your videos?
"Do any climbs favor hard tails?" Anything more than a smooth surface and a full suspension wins, I don't know how pro XC racers use hard tails on the gnarly courses they have to race now. I learned the misconception of "hard tails climb better because more power gets to the tire." True, right up until the rear tire hits literally anything. Root, Rock, slight bump in the dirt, anything that can ram into the tire makes the bike stop dead, any bump in the trail bounces you off the seat, they're a bitch to use for climbs.
Kazimer's in time out, hahaha
You misspelled Levy.
@@spiffpilot2589 shit
Way to grind it Sarah! Woo!🤘
I still with polygon 😂
Doesn't even look that steep on video, but the features are the hard part, right?
Her breathing says its steep
I feel like I do this a lot. I'm tired during the first 3 minutes of climbing then after that I can climb up anything. Anyone else get second winds like this?
Why do I feel like they're climbing terribly. I get the wet dirt though, but I feel the power strokes are so badly used and the line choice isn't the bike's fault.
She is also looking down at her front wheel the whole climb instead of slightly more forward, not saying she isn't a good climber, but I don't think it's a fair comparison because the bikes can likely climb much better than she may feel comfortable with. No hate though, the video is fun and I'm glad they did it!
@@slowspoke1027 I agree witht he same arguments. For the grawler to climb that well, the giant named first and the XC-ish Norco and BMC being so far apart goes to show how they literally cared only off of grip (tires) and handling (short stem).
@@ZhengZL69 I have a growler and I can guarantee I'd be much better at climbing on literally any other steeper angled hardtail, I've only ridden one other bike uphill so far but the difference in climb performance is ultimately down to how skilled you are as a rider. All this said, it's still fair to make said video because it has some value; the tires and setups of the bikes do matter quite a bit for harder technical climbing, and having a slightly less skilled rider hosting the videos helps to demonstrate how the average rider is likely to handle the bikes on a climb. Mike is an extremely proficient rider, and it's fair to say he'd likely be able to do this specific climb a bit easier than she managed to. However without being there and trying that climb yourself it's hard to make judgements, seeing as it may be much trickier than video makes it seem 😃
P.S. I want to emphasize that nobody should be hating on her climbing techniques, everyone is out there trying to have a good time, and I'm sure she was trying hard to make it up those climbs.
I do feel that it would maybe have been interesting to have them do 5 tries on each bike to see if she could have learned the climb lines a bit better on each frame before moving to the next one, since it's easy to hit one root and be tossed (and that isn't a fair judgement of the bikes performance).
@@spiffpilot2589 not blaming her, just saying the video doesn't really give each bike enough of a chance
@@spiffpilot2589 Based on the tests. The Norco and the BMC paired with a DH casing tire, 10 psi and +25% sag would've crushed it. Not her fault, I'm just saying that this video is unfair (just like most Impossible Climb PB videos).
Kind of wish each bike got a couple runs to account for swerving off line, but there's only so many hours in a day, so 🤷♀️
Great work Sarah 💪
I wonder how a good fat bike would fair on this kind of test. Might make for some interesting content.
People from the Rockies laughing at these climbs rn
PBA Jr. PLEASE
now thats a climb!
tire test more than anything else
Plus bike: hold my beer
E fat bike: holds said beer and, follows with a six-pack in backpack.
That's because you're doing less...
@@nikolaikhodyakov2417 pardon my ingoramousness, what is DCA?
@@bimmermac DCA, or DoubleCrownAddict, is a pinkbike user known for being constantly downvoted because of his moronic views. Some of the highlights of these views are that ebikes are better than outdated "analog" bikes, derailleurs are very dangerous and must be replaced by gearboxes, YT, the bike brand, are nazi Trumpists
@@nikolaikhodyakov4906 thank you kind sir. But on the other hand I do own a plus bike and my bud has a fat bike and the level of grip is just amazing.
@@bimmermac Nobody really cares about fat bikers, we just look at them funny. Ebikes and ebikers on the other hand...
I've been loving seeing her lately more on the bike! Love her energy but i do miss the cussing haha
Thé impossible climb for something is impossible, i will die hère trying to climb 💀
These are real bikers...no shitty e"bike" rubbish :-)
Why hate on ebikes, some people have no choice but to ride them
@@George-je1fs Some..disabled, old...otherwise sad to behold
@@MtbPoland I agree just don't want those people feeling bad because they have to ride an ebike
Great climbing reveiw from you Sarah. Wtf is Levy doing to that innocent tree in the intro. That is not how you become one with the forrest. Fortunately we have Sarah to wash out that memory MIKE 😠🤘.
Invite Ali Clarkson next time!
the camera men hurt my eyes, could you put a camo / ghillie suit on them? thanks :)
Wish I was half the Rider you are Sarah
sara you got fans girl😘😍😍
So which was the lightest bike with the easiest gearing, and a lockout?
Likely the BMC since it's more XC
drive the yt capra and you will reach the top without falling
But good luck with the worse customer service in the industry 😂
@@George-je1fs I was very satisfied with my inspection, maintenance and service, had no problems. I had personally brought my bike to yt, a 2 hour drive by car😁😜
@@jurgenz1 no worries for you then
No offense to Sarah but I think this trial depends more on Skill than the bikes. Although, having rear suspension is an advantage ( helps generate more traction) choosing the smoother line is probably the priority. It also depends on the person's physical traits, meaning, one person may perform better on another bike and vice versa. I would probably have some issues myself with that climb - it seems like there is a rock garden among root, etc. which I know can be a pain!
The Ripley should've surpassed the Marin and Giant. It has a reputation for being one of, if not, the best climber on the market!
The ibis had pretty much all around poor performance this entire test, along with the latest video showing the tire literally contacts the frame at bottom out, not even sure how a legitimate bike company makes a mistake like that. At the beginning of the test I totally thought the ibis was the best and wanted that one. I'd far rather go with the trance, Marshall, or rift zone over the Ripley now. Ibis needs to put in some more work before releasing their next bike.
What's the censorship budget?
TH-cam now charges channels for everytime they say a curse word or other "inappropriate" word, even if they bleep it. Known as the Censorship Charge, they didn't officially announce the amount and it sounds like they charge larger channels higher amounts, but some are saying it's usually at least $50/word. And if you aren't approved for ads, they just straight charge you instead of withholding your income.
Thanks, that's good to know. Hopefully people will swear less now
@@carterbetteridge9259 someone apparently released like a ten minute video of just pure swearing and TH-cam may try to charge them over $1M. Kinda ridiculous.
What a waste of money😄
Why you ghys dont have scott bike
Why doesn't she stand up?
Only nerds stand and pedal.
Sick
Not enough swearing
Sarah deserves a donut
Finally
Sarah is a hottie 😍
the smile and giggles make me watch till the end. I think I have a crush on you now, ur so cute!
yew!
👍
Camera guy casually walks behind while she pretends to struggle.
That man is moving all nimbly nimbly!
What a useless comparison.
I doubt she could make that climb on a 10,000 bike.
Bring back mike!
Chosing a different line each bike doesent make any sence right? 🤦🏾
Im sorry. I wish there was one good thing i could say about the video.....
It was fun to see Sarah giggling all the way up the hill. That was okay right?
Yeah no, get mike back
This is so boring.
Don't watch it then
the laughing is soo annoying