Oh I've seen this before, just in a different video. It was controversial bc it went to the guy that punched. It went to him for full on engulfing the other guy
When i reffed I’d tell people if you swing and miss it’s still a red. In this case, if you swing, miss and the guy acts like he’s going to die... you still get a red.
You’re right as the law literally states that striking or attempting to strike an opponent is an act of violent conduct and therefore a red. There doesn’t have to be contact, just intent.
I'm not sure why you are using controversial?! The white jersey player turn and throws a punch, should have been a straight red card no questions asked....
Coz he probably got sent off for a punch in the face. There was no punch. It was an open handed slap that hit the other fella on the back (watch it at 25% speed). It's still a red for the attempt but the 'victim' was holding his face before the slap landed.
@@gerardsavage1145 I see no difference, slap or punch, it's a violent behaviour and well deserved straigh red anyway. And how can you tell that ref thought it was a punch.
@@bababaysmith Because it looked like a punch and the fella lay on the ground like he'd just been felled by a haymaker. Not a huge leap to assume that's what the ref thought. You're right, there is no difference between punch and slap. He deserves to go. But the shit on the ground should have got a yellow aswell.
That was a straight red i think they wanted a foul from the strong challenge made before the counter attack cause if that was given there wouldn't have been thag red card
The guy in the blue holding the guy in the white? If that's the case, kinda weird the guy in blue grabbed the guy in white since blue was on the counter.
For anyone who can't see, like some of the previous commentators apparently, this is what happens:- • The blue player pulls the white players sleeve • The white player throws his elbow back and looks to make contact with the blue players face • The white player turns and hits the blue player on the torso. Correct decision would be:- • Free kick to white team • Yellow card for blue player • Red card for white player.
No. The blue player didn't do anything definitively wrong. The white player was intentionally obstructing his run the entire time and any tug is likely illusory if that.
I would have pulled a red too, know it wasn't a punch but still enough for a red, even in the last min. He deliberately makes an aggressive force toward the opponent, causing a stoppage of progression. Red card first, middle, and last min of the game in my book.
Looked like 2 decent teams 'knocking' the ball around, afew tired legs given the OT, when your no 21 man steps up with an attempted knock out. Cheap shot and the spit at the end is something you just don't get taught as a kid.
that punch never landed but of course the player has to go down as if the punch did connect. again, the spot of soccer is littered with bad actors who try to gain an advantage by cheating. play the game the right way or not at all
This all could have been avoided if the referee called obstruction on 21 white first when he did it. The ball was not within playing distance and he (21 white) impleaded the blue player first before the blue player ran up the back of 21 white.
Perhaps even if the referee called the foul as the white player blocking and not allowing for the other player to play, the white player would perhaps still have time to punch the blue player while the referee was blowing the whistle
Explain whats controversial. If a player strikes or attempts to strike another player they are instantly sent off. The player that got punched should of got a yellow for holding.
I don’t know why most people in the comments are saying it was definitely a red. The guy was slightly annoyed and turned and with really no force, slapped the dude openhanded on the back. I’ve seen players get away w way worse and I mean I get why he got a red but ref reacted too much with the crowd as most of you have.
There is absolutely no controversy here at all. Whether the slap/punch made contact is irrelevant, it's violent conduct and an obvious red card. The only controversy would have been if no red card was shown.
As soon as you raise your hands, that’s intent to do harm: miss or not. Just because someone’s aim is so poor they miss a punch aswell as the ball doesn’t give them a by. It’s a straight red all day every day
Canal de 2000 subs con una técnica brutal de spoiler mezclado con mentiras y sin repetir la imagen a cámara lenta para que retrocedamos y veamos el video de nuevo. Me quito el sombrero 🤯
34 years as a ref here => i saw a yellow card tackle23 sec for blue defender then I see a serious foul in the pull by the blue mid fielder (potential yellow) then the "strikes" opponent of the white (red card offence in any game) (Just a fact and a Law of the game) ==> my real question is why the ref is not making his calls from a position on the field as he seems to come from the white penalty area wwaayyy down field of all of these wrong doings --- that alone makes him the problem - surprised if this game did not end with several punch out moments - as clearly control was never in place in this game...
That is absolutely a foul at 0:23, and should have been a DFK for white. Touching the ball "first" does not absolve you of the foul, and believing otherwise is just not supported in the LOTG. That was clearly a careless tackle that took out the white player by direct contact that was not shoulder to shoulder (which is the only physical contact allowed in the LOTG), therefore a foul.
1) where was the red card? 2) it's extra time, not overtime 3) the other tackle before the counterattack was a foul 4) if i got punched like that and my team mates didn't beat him up i'd never play for them again
The only controversy here is that you don't know that's its called Extra Time or Injury Time and NOT Overtime OT ... this is Football not American football
If u put the playback speed at x2.5 at 0.32 u can c That the white guy didn’t really hit the black team guy in the mouth… he just hit him in the shoulder
Wow that was controversial. How dare the ref give a red card for something as minor as a guy getting punched in the face, the offending player was just showing a little bit of youthful exuberance 😜
Let's go over this real quick. @ 30 sec, pause the vid and change the speed to .025× Notice how blue shirt has already lost possession of the ball! He rips all over white shirt and pulls him back! @32 sec blue shirt is already grabbing his nose but @33 sec white shirt clearly slaps the dude on the back to get him off. Blue shirt has to be Neymar's kid because this is the most iconic flop I've ever seen and all the comments talking about "it's not controversial😭" Take time to evaluate things people🙏🤦🏼♂️
He got hit in the face with a shoulder or elbow, then #5 swung at his face and missed. No faking. Red for #5 is right. But I only see all that in slow motion here. Ref did not even have a good angle on it, so lucky for him to get the call right.
So where’s the slide tackle call a few seconds before the punch? Because the player on white didn’t roll and sell the call, there isn’t a card?? Dude on blue comes in spikes up and definitely doesn’t get all ball
It's like you people never watch real football, the guy in blue flopped the guy in white pushed him with an open hand, pause the video then use the period key and the comma keys to step frame by frame. There was no elbow, the guy in blue is hoping for a red... He never spits on anyone he shouted at him.
CRXPhil always the refs fault eh? No mention of players not being able to contain their emotions. I have been both a player and a ref. Both are equally difficult. Only one gets constantly blamed though. Out of curiosity, how many games have you officiated? At what level?
The guy in blue was grabbing the white guy's shirt obviously obstructing him from playing properly, the white team should have gotten a free kick before the white player even had a chance to throw a punch, but since he did, he should have gotten a red.
indeed, the body of the blue player didn't touch the white player's face....but the white player definetly hit the blue player, even if he missed it would still be a red
that is already beyond a red, it is an assaults'. from a law point of view, the guy can be charged with assaults'. the only controversial thing is if the referee did not do anything after this.
I mean, the blue shirt was grabing the other's guy shirt and pulling him. If the white shirt player called the ref, it might've stopped there, and it might've ended up on a yellow card for the blue shirt guy. But well, that's not how things went... HOWEVER, the blue guy fakes the punch in the face. That's not nice. Maybe red for blue, yellow for white? Or yellow for both, idk.
Ik this is kinda random but i just hate it when parents think they know the rules and stuff but they clearly dont and its just annoying hearing the random stuff they say. Especially because im a soccer ref my self and i just wanna tell them to just shut up, watch the game and let the ref do their job.
This high school and college football ⚽ games videos are so much better than the actual MLS. It reminds me of the HUGE difference in dinamism and quality of play between Argentinian and Spanish leagues. The Argentinians play the true game and it's all about passion and drive for the sport and competitive spirit. They give everything in every game and it's just an amazing thing to see and enjoy every time and no matter what team or championship they're are playing they just go for it like it is the final day of their lives the biggest match ever the greatest of finals, and so on. Meanwhile in Spain and most of the UEFA leagues matches are so boring, dull and lame. Nobody wants to get hurt, nobody make an actual effort for bringing the sport to the people, so the games are all based on repetitive and senseless passing ALL THE TIME, and players are just crybabies, lazy and cowards. Even knowing that many of them are rich in real life they still play like children being watched by their moms and make the game extremely weak and dumb.
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (2/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qbHbshrA1f0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLBjiHvkKtE/mqdefault.jpg)
The only controversy here is that you don’t know what controversy means!
Well said
Apparently the guy that got sparked out got sent off
how is the fact that he doesn't know what controversy means a controversy? looks like u need to whip out the dictionary lmaooo all jokes my guy
I don't see any controversy about that either.
@@papaknuttt3114 you’re making this more confusing that it already was😂
Mate if this was in the uk Sunday leagues, 22 man brawl in no time.
Yes
@@noyes6131 no yes
Who cares about UK
@@jordiantonio6551 your mom does
@@rj1h820 I can assure you she doesn’t
Controversial? 🤔
Oh I've seen this before, just in a different video. It was controversial bc it went to the guy that punched. It went to him for full on engulfing the other guy
Straight red
😂
Omg watch in slow motion he open hands the dudes shoulder hahahah
He didn't get his face I watched it slowed down
Controversial? He slugged him then obviously spit on him, wheres the controversy?
William Samples slow the video down William. You fool
Marco Vasta calling him a fool probably made you feel huge. Congrats on that.
@@Marco-bp5zt slowing the video down means nothing. It doesn't matter if he connected or not. It's a red card
@@Marco-bp5zt if you think that’s controversial then you’re the fool. He punched him in the face 😂
@@Marco-bp5zt th-cam.com/video/Ln5ppC3mt08/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MarcoVasta
When i reffed I’d tell people if you swing and miss it’s still a red. In this case, if you swing, miss and the guy acts like he’s going to die... you still get a red.
If there was truly no contact maybe I’d give the ‘victim’ a yellow too.
No garbage allowed.
You’re right as the law literally states that striking or attempting to strike an opponent is an act of violent conduct and therefore a red. There doesn’t have to be contact, just intent.
You still give a yellow to the person rolling for simulation.
late comment but he caught an elbow to the face if u watch it slowly, it would be easily visible from the refs perspective but not ours.
But buddy got punched in the face. How was it not red
I'm not sure why you are using controversial?! The white jersey player turn and throws a punch, should have been a straight red card no questions asked....
actually the left elbow was the one that earn him the red card the other half ass slap dont even count
violent conduct , straight red no questions
@@nonickname544 no the white player commited the first foul for obstruction while the guy in blue was trying to get away he got elbowed then slapped.
@@nonickname544 reality isn’t your friend. Throwing a strike is a straight red.
How on earth anyone can find that controversial?
Coz he probably got sent off for a punch in the face. There was no punch. It was an open handed slap that hit the other fella on the back (watch it at 25% speed). It's still a red for the attempt but the 'victim' was holding his face before the slap landed.
@@gerardsavage1145 I see no difference, slap or punch, it's a violent behaviour and well deserved straigh red anyway. And how can you tell that ref thought it was a punch.
@@bababaysmith Because it looked like a punch and the fella lay on the ground like he'd just been felled by a haymaker. Not a huge leap to assume that's what the ref thought.
You're right, there is no difference between punch and slap. He deserves to go. But the shit on the ground should have got a yellow aswell.
That was a straight red i think they wanted a foul from the strong challenge made before the counter attack cause if that was given there wouldn't have been thag red card
The guy in the blue holding the guy in the white? If that's the case, kinda weird the guy in blue grabbed the guy in white since blue was on the counter.
There’s no controversy. He took a swing 😆 straight red
For anyone who can't see, like some of the previous commentators apparently, this is what happens:-
• The blue player pulls the white players sleeve
• The white player throws his elbow back and looks to make contact with the blue players face
• The white player turns and hits the blue player on the torso.
Correct decision would be:-
• Free kick to white team
• Yellow card for blue player
• Red card for white player.
Yup, agree with that!
Right call! Roger Chase
No. The blue player didn't do anything definitively wrong. The white player was intentionally obstructing his run the entire time and any tug is likely illusory if that.
The correct decision would be for both of them to find a new sport as they are clearly shite @ football
@@FavreianVengeance Nothing wrong with obstructing a run, thats called defending. The Blue player fouled the white originally.
Only problem is the fact that none of his boys stood up for him. Tough.
I would have pulled a red too, know it wasn't a punch but still enough for a red, even in the last min. He deliberately makes an aggressive force toward the opponent, causing a stoppage of progression. Red card first, middle, and last min of the game in my book.
the only foul is the dude getting his shirt pulled back
The guy in blue commited a foul by pulling the shirt first. I would lay you out for that also.
@@badrobot3159 So yea, free kick would be fore white, but a red card after the play as well.
The only controversy here is that you call it Overtime instead of Extra Time... And that you guys are playing on an American football pitch...
nobody invited you
We don't have the funding for a proper soccer field here in most areas.
@@jordiantonio6551 I invited him
@@jordiantonio6551 are you crying?
Sebastian I agree with u
Looked like 2 decent teams 'knocking' the ball around, afew tired legs given the OT, when your no 21 man steps up with an attempted knock out. Cheap shot and the spit at the end is something you just don't get taught as a kid.
I don't a knock out is a football tactic mate
I’m scared to wonder what two teams went against each other
Welp... the kid didn't punch his face, but the attempt counts as aggressive behavior and that means he deserves a red card.
that punch never landed but of course the player has to go down as if the punch did connect. again, the spot of soccer is littered with bad actors who try to gain an advantage by cheating.
play the game the right way or not at all
he hit him to the face with elbow
He never spat on him he shouted at him. Absolute drama queens on this 😂
The slide tackle at 0:20 was more deserving of a red than anything.
100%
When a referee don't know he can still give a red card even after the game is finished
Controversial is to think that red card was controversial.
This all could have been avoided if the referee called obstruction on 21 white first when he did it. The ball was not within playing distance and he (21 white) impleaded the blue player first before the blue player ran up the back of 21 white.
Perhaps even if the referee called the foul as the white player blocking and not allowing for the other player to play, the white player would perhaps still have time to punch the blue player while the referee was blowing the whistle
I love how number 4 just sits down 😂😂
Yall, it’s controversial cause blue was practically holding whites arm behind it back and trying to drag him to the floor
With the title of the video I thought it was talking about the 2 footed tackle that doesn’t win the ball
Explain whats controversial. If a player strikes or attempts to strike another player they are instantly sent off. The player that got punched should of got a yellow for holding.
Peter Rabbit when the special ed kid calls someone retard😳
At 0:29 I see something happening can't tell what that makes blue fall into white then white elbows blue before he falls to the ground.
Controversial is you writing OT instead of added time in the title
I don’t know why most people in the comments are saying it was definitely a red. The guy was slightly annoyed and turned and with really no force, slapped the dude openhanded on the back. I’ve seen players get away w way worse and I mean I get why he got a red but ref reacted too much with the crowd as most of you have.
It’s football rule that intent of violent actions such as a slap or punch like that are red card wherever or not they make contact
look at it again in slow motion.... he elbowed him in the face
There is absolutely no controversy here at all. Whether the slap/punch made contact is irrelevant, it's violent conduct and an obvious red card. The only controversy would have been if no red card was shown.
Everybody, calm down and wait a second
The referee needs to catch his breath
As soon as you raise your hands, that’s intent to do harm: miss or not.
Just because someone’s aim is so poor they miss a punch aswell as the ball doesn’t give them a by.
It’s a straight red all day every day
The real controversy is the video title.
the man in white did was just giving him karma to the other guy
If you slow it down you can see he didint even land the “punch” but before that he elbowed him while running
He didn't hit him in the face but the punch did hit him. That doesn't really matter though, still should be a red
Canal de 2000 subs con una técnica brutal de spoiler mezclado con mentiras y sin repetir la imagen a cámara lenta para que retrocedamos y veamos el video de nuevo. Me quito el sombrero 🤯
Nothing much controversial here. He threw a punch.
It wasn’t even his mouth😂
Katie Whittaker watch his elbow, it was red card , elbow + aggression
34 years as a ref here => i saw a yellow card tackle23 sec for blue defender then I see a serious foul in the pull by the blue mid fielder (potential yellow) then the "strikes" opponent of the white (red card offence in any game) (Just a fact and a Law of the game) ==> my real question is why the ref is not making his calls from a position on the field as he seems to come from the white penalty area wwaayyy down field of all of these wrong doings --- that alone makes him the problem - surprised if this game did not end with several punch out moments - as clearly control was never in place in this game...
That is absolutely a foul at 0:23, and should have been a DFK for white. Touching the ball "first" does not absolve you of the foul, and believing otherwise is just not supported in the LOTG. That was clearly a careless tackle that took out the white player by direct contact that was not shoulder to shoulder (which is the only physical contact allowed in the LOTG), therefore a foul.
1) where was the red card?
2) it's extra time, not overtime
3) the other tackle before the counterattack was a foul
4) if i got punched like that and my team mates didn't beat him up i'd never play for them again
The only controversy here is that you don't know that's its called Extra Time or Injury Time and NOT Overtime OT ... this is Football not American football
Why is TH-cam recommending numerous videos showcasing the fact that Americans STILL don’t understand football?
This will always be a red no matter what situation or minute of the game
I came to the comment to say what controversy, dude got socked it the face but I can see everybody in the comments has got it covered already lol.
If u put the playback speed at x2.5 at 0.32 u can c
That the white guy didn’t really hit the black team guy in the mouth… he just hit him in the shoulder
Where’s the red?
how old were they ?
Wow that was controversial.
How dare the ref give a red card for something as minor as a guy getting punched in the face, the offending player was just showing a little bit of youthful exuberance 😜
Let's go over this real quick. @ 30 sec, pause the vid and change the speed to .025×
Notice how blue shirt has already lost possession of the ball! He rips all over white shirt and pulls him back!
@32 sec blue shirt is already grabbing his nose but @33 sec white shirt clearly slaps the dude on the back to get him off.
Blue shirt has to be Neymar's kid because this is the most iconic flop I've ever seen and all the comments talking about "it's not controversial😭"
Take time to evaluate things people🙏🤦🏼♂️
Controversial? “he punched him in the face” it wasnt even a punch. Maybe a little slap on his shoulder.
You raise your hands in football and it's a red card.
0:57 - One guy off screen psyching himself up with crowd hysteria to have his moment!
Yeah dude, we all saw it.
Red card, plus kicked out of the league. That's what he should have got.
What’s controversial about punching someone in the face? 🙄
When you slow it down to 0.25x, you noticed he just slapped the guys shoulder, but the guy covered his mouth. Well it's ⚽, it is what it is.
If this was the uk there would be a full on 22 man plus however many parents join in fight.
Send them both off. The blue guy hugged on to him and then the white player struck his shoulder (not his head; slow it down)
his elbow hit his nose wtach again
@@wionkidedike1198 i.imgur.com/CooL60o.jpg
Bro didnt even touch him😂😂
He got hit in the face with a shoulder or elbow, then #5 swung at his face and missed. No faking. Red for #5 is right. But I only see all that in slow motion here. Ref did not even have a good angle on it, so lucky for him to get the call right.
That was a blatant attempt to injure. He should be kicked out of the league if not worse.
I love how the crowd / parents are louder than the actual players on the pitch 😂
thats how it normally is in professional games lmaoo
Did I miss the red card being shown?
he never punched, put it in x0.5 speed you can see he balls his fist and then moves his hand to push the blue guys back with an open hand.
No controversy here. A punch = red card. Simple.
what red card?
disfiguration i didnt see the ref take out any card. That’s strange.
exactly, there is no card. Weird video title for sure
So where’s the slide tackle call a few seconds before the punch? Because the player on white didn’t roll and sell the call, there isn’t a card?? Dude on blue comes in spikes up and definitely doesn’t get all ball
The only controversy was whether this guy should get two reds instead of one.
Red for the punching, yellow for the pulling
Geez, “he punched him in the face” that wasn’t a punch wtf.
These guys should play rugby
Footballer's are pussies compared to Rugby players.
he hit him to the face with elbow
It's like you people never watch real football, the guy in blue flopped the guy in white pushed him with an open hand, pause the video then use the period key and the comma keys to step frame by frame. There was no elbow, the guy in blue is hoping for a red... He never spits on anyone he shouted at him.
he hit him to the face with elbow..
1) Not controversial 2) the guy holding him asked for it. Both of them got what they deserved haha
What is this pitch
Ref is to blame. Should have stopped play when blue player was crawling all over the white player like a jungle gym
CRXPhil always the refs fault eh? No mention of players not being able to contain their emotions. I have been both a player and a ref. Both are equally difficult. Only one gets constantly blamed though. Out of curiosity, how many games have you officiated? At what level?
100%
Clearly a red card, should not be a discussion.
In addition to the violent conduct, why don't I see the referee show the red card?
One game suspension isn't even enough for this type of behavior
That’s a natural reaction to when an idiot is grabbing you from behind and not letting go of you , but you gotta keep calm in all situations.
The ref didn't even reach for a card. He just wants to end the game and call it a day 😅
The guy in blue was grabbing the white guy's shirt obviously obstructing him from playing properly, the white team should have gotten a free kick before the white player even had a chance to throw a punch, but since he did, he should have gotten a red.
Do any of you have eyes? No part of the blue players body touched the white players face. All an act.
He still intended to hit him intentionally. Whether you he hit him or not, conduct like this deserves a red card.
Strike or attempt to strike. We are agreed!
indeed, the body of the blue player didn't touch the white player's face....but the white player definetly hit the blue player, even if he missed it would still be a red
White elbowed him in the face, you can see him react before the white player swings.
that is already beyond a red, it is an assaults'.
from a law point of view, the guy can be charged with assaults'. the only controversial thing is if the referee did not do anything after this.
Nothing controversial with this. Straight red.
Yeah he pulled his shirt but he punched him and look professional leagues they flop for less things then punching someone.
Zero controversy about the red card.
Boys boys boys. Put it in 0.5X speed and you can clearly see no punch
I mean, the blue shirt was grabing the other's guy shirt and pulling him. If the white shirt player called the ref, it might've stopped there, and it might've ended up on a yellow card for the blue shirt guy. But well, that's not how things went...
HOWEVER, the blue guy fakes the punch in the face. That's not nice. Maybe red for blue, yellow for white? Or yellow for both, idk.
0:32 - so when did this football game turned to a ufc match? I see the white shirt guy missed his face but the navy blue shirt guy sold it well.
Ik this is kinda random but i just hate it when parents think they know the rules and stuff but they clearly dont and its just annoying hearing the random stuff they say. Especially because im a soccer ref my self and i just wanna tell them to just shut up, watch the game and let the ref do their job.
Guys I think the controversy is that he hasn’t booked him for it
Did he ever receive his “technical”? That lady really wanted it…. 😂
Nothing Controversial about it. Violent conduct, striking or attempting to strike. Straight Red.
All I see is that Americans don't understand the term "controversial"
You probably use the word "literally" wrong as well.
Those referees do not have the personality to expel the aggressive player, it is for a direct red
absolutely red card for the player that punched another dude and a yellow card for the dude that got punched
This high school and college football ⚽ games videos are so much better than the actual MLS. It reminds me of the HUGE difference in dinamism and quality of play between Argentinian and Spanish leagues. The Argentinians play the true game and it's all about passion and drive for the sport and competitive spirit. They give everything in every game and it's just an amazing thing to see and enjoy every time and no matter what team or championship they're are playing they just go for it like it is the final day of their lives the biggest match ever the greatest of finals, and so on.
Meanwhile in Spain and most of the UEFA leagues matches are so boring, dull and lame. Nobody wants to get hurt, nobody make an actual effort for bringing the sport to the people, so the games are all based on repetitive and senseless passing ALL THE TIME, and players are just crybabies, lazy and cowards. Even knowing that many of them are rich in real life they still play like children being watched by their moms and make the game extremely weak and dumb.
all these red cards in the states, and the teammates never have a proper word to say to the ref
Obviously the controversy is that a red card wasn't given.....🤦🏾♂️
I don’t think this is controversial. Just my opinion though. No hate from me.
It’s called “real Futbol” not controversy.
So who won?
Standard shit in Scottish football. You even get fans attacking players over here.