4:24 it randomly formed a kind of e minor arpeggio with the passing f#. I know it's nothing related to tempered tradicional music but it's funny to see these things happening randomly.
5 year old comment BUT that was most likely intentional. Considering the weight of the mics and where they start along with the pitches being pre determined there are defos larger harmonic moments that were planned to happen.
Sounded great. But the alternate camera angle, the closeup from the side, made me dizzy and didn't contribute to my understanding of the piece. I would have stuck with the original camera angle.
Sounds very different from the recording I've heard. I guess things like the lengths of the cables, closeness to the speakers and a number of other factors can totally change the way this piece sounds.
Robert Wilks The cable length doesn't really have much to do with the frequency that a mic feeds back (unless it's a really poor quality cable and then the noise piles up fast). Different mics and speakers all feed back at different frequencies regardless of the distance but they used the same speakers and mics for all four tones so I'm guessing it was intentionally EQed this way.
The length of the pendulum determines the period of its oscillation. The dimensions of the room and the distance from the microphone to the speaker affect the frequency of the feedback. As the angle that the pendulum moves through decreases, the period stays the same but the mic spends more time in proximity to the speaker. And then the doppler effect is what ultimately gives you that slide between pitches. Sorry, I mostly wrote that for myself. This one sounds much different from the original because it looks like they took the time to do a lot of calculations in positioning everything so that the result would actually be in a key
@@kailalynch1223 it’s not really random because it’s a pendulum so the sounds themselves after you hear the original frequency can set up an expectation for the remainder of the piece as you know they will get longer and closer together as the pendulum swings in smaller amounts
Music is nothing but an art form whose medium is sound. If you say this isn't music, then there can be no music. Simply because there is no carefully considered choice of chords or words or rhythms does not make it any less viable than anything else. Instead of creating a finite, individual song, Reich's created an infinitely variable concept that can be played by literally anyone. Isn't that simply stunning? Without any professional training, just a very basic explanation, you can play a piece of music that encompasses a highly advanced concept, that of chaos? The same goes for John Cage's "4:33" that I've seen mentioned below. That piece should never be "performed" by an individual, just showcased to a participating audience. This is still groundbreaking now, 57 years after its' creation. That says a lot.
Of course it is music, but to say it's good music or impressive music is something that the public mind I think tells you the most about. That public hasn't changed its opinion. Art snobs will always be art snobs, and tell you that anything can have a profound meaning as long as you attach the right story to it. The artist can do what it wants, but this piece doesn't enlighten me in the slightest.
Torchkas-alt I personally would say this piece is more about being interested in the sound and the effects of chance than enlightenment. Not aware of a profound story or message attached to it either. Which isn't to say you need to like it of course, it's a matter of personal taste. It's not unheard of for members of the public to spend untold sums of money to watch their idol lip sync their way through a song they didn't write. You'll forgive me if I make my own mind up.
I see a lot of nay-sayers, and all I want to say is the idea was from-19 bloody-68. Call it what you want, but there is at least genuine novelty to be had here. The arbitrary universal laws of motion, the phase incoherence, the one-shot chaotic element... Its more stage art than music, but sheesh, in the meantime all we're fed are samples of the late n' greats under obvious 2/4 phrases marred by forced rhyme. I think I'd rather listen to this (done infinite times with varying distances and pitches through the speakers ect) than the radio. If all I get anyway is soulless, I'd rather hear an interpretation of the universe. PS, at least Reich didn't try to copyright silence, lol.
I think this doesn't have soul. This snobby "endless experimentation" that got kickstarted in the late 19th century doesn't have any more soul than the modern music business does. Steve Reich's music is designed to give an impressive or intrigued emotion, but it doesn't last. The art itself doesn't actually have any substantial meaning from Reich's part. He just did it because endless experimentation is art. There's no emotion or soul put into this, even if you can think of countless of descriptions after the fact, that doesn't matter anymore. I'll take minimalism and the ability of an artist to limit themselves over this pretentious snobbery any day. I'll agree that radio is probably not much better than this, but that doesn't say much.
In many ways I agree with you. Unsurprisingly I feel a little different a year after I wrote that. No, Steve did not put any "emotion" or "soul" into it. This is more like the musical equivalent to a Jackson Pollock or a Rorschach, where if done a million times *could* get a million different emotions out of you, the viewer. It's kinda like the old Sufi mystic proverb... "Who is the great sage who makes all the grass green." You, my friend, are the one who makes meaning out of static.
Surprisingly engaging. There's even some sense of resolution when they accidentally line up together, or when finally in the end all of them line up to produce one blob of noise.
This is a set piece built in 1966 but performed con-temporarily. Today's artists just don't have the same mind set to start the mics swinging as they did back in the glorious 1960's. It's all in the wrist.
Thanks all girls and guy for your comments. Here you'll find the last version we have done at the Fine Art School in Le Mans (France), with students... th-cam.com/video/HTlm2bpbd8Q/w-d-xo.html
The score is a simple bit of text stating that the mics should all be released at the same time, thus making the element of phase more apparent to the listener. I'm really glad this video was made and presented, I just hope next time it will be done correctly!
If you let yourself get brought in by this when the microphones slow down it hits harder than any beat drop in music before, I can see why Vince sampled it.
It hasn’t been officially confirmed that it was used in “Norf Norf,” though, nor which recording it was that was sampled, but mad props to Clams Casino for that beat! Peace.
Weird. They didn’t follow the part of the instructions which says: ‘Performers then sit down to watch and listen to the process along with the audience.’
Why does anyone say this isn't music? Sounds like it's got a pretty clear beat and melody to me, it sounds a lot like early electronic music, which I guess is exactly what it is. Yeah, the melody and rhythm aren't in the score for the music and it not only changes with each performance but over the course of the piece, but so what? Something that is easy to identify as music emerges from the piece, and so it is music.
fr, classical pieces like this as well as late 60s guitar players (esp Jimi Hendrix) intentionally manipulated feedback to generate specific notes and harmonics and sounds. wouldn't have ever had any of the rock music from the 70s-90s or the hip hop from 2016-now without their innovations
+lulubelle padieu each of speakers placed pointing upwards on the floor is connected to the microphone which hangs directly above it. As the microphone swings past the speaker it creates a feedback loop which produces the sound you hear, as the speaker swings away the loop is effectively broken and the sound stops. The longer a microphone spends directly above it's own speaker, the longer the feedback sound will be heard.
This really feels like a uni students getting stoned and coming up with the best way to create an assignment submission without having to do any actual work.
David Dalmazzo Watch the outermics. They're very close in period and thus appear to be one voice, but the small difference in frequency creates a sort of glissando between the two voices that is strong enough to create the sound if one voice with a sort of sliding dynamic.
Where's the excitement in the performers? The "Oh man this is gonna sound so cool!" factor? They all look so up-tight or bored with it. This is awesome stuff! There needs to be some happiness, eagerness, or something in the presentation.
+c0rv377 That's sort of the blank canvas performer approach. Steve Reich wrote a duet to be performed by gravity and inertia themselves. The humans are secondary to the performance. So they stay quiet and blank inorder to let the mechanism itself perform. Either that or they're just stuck up orchestral types. :)
Just a little feedback here: Not every idea Is a great idea Just because it's an idea. But not all music That I don't want to hear again Is bad music. Some people talk as though one or the other of those statements Must be the truth. But I believe Both of them Are.
Au contraire. They begged me personally. I was reluctant at first, but they would not be denied So I complied, Knowing the danger, and risking looking like a total doofus, for the greater good of the universe.
Interesting random music experience. This type of «musiqie» brings us back perhaps to the origins of the very first musical creations of our distant ancestors. Up to a certain point, this type of sound material makes me think of «prinitive» music, that said without pejorative intention, which musical ethnologists have made possible to make discover to the general public, through the intermediary of certain peoples who practice or had practiced this kind of music. It is perhaps a matter of updating the genesis of all music, up to ours. This being said, it is likely that I overstepped the composer’s intention. It would have been relevant to know his point of view on this subject..
It's nice how the tempo doesn't change but the 'notes' get stretched. This is due to the fact that an ideal pendulum doesn't change frequency. Is there a digital version of this effect? I don't think there is.
rick moranis fantacist the microphones all have the same frequency characteristics and pick-up pattern, so they will normally produce a similar sound. however, when you apply EQ to the microphone-signal, you can alter it's frequency-response. note that there are no high pitched tones audible. this strongly suggests that the amplified signal has been modified, through the use of an equalizer, which is used to either cut or boost frequencies from the audible spectrum.
Steven Reich on Pendulum Music - "If it's done right, it's kind of funny."
👁️👁️👁️
That's all it is
I ain't never ran from nothing but the police
From the city where the skinny carry strong heat
Norf side long beach
Nice
i don't get it
@@hankigoe829 Vince Staples - Norf Norf sampled this
This music really swings.
But can you dance to it?
@@faerieSAALE yes
*stars to dance fornite*
😂😂😂😂
Badmm tss
It sounds like an alert on a spaceship that the crew is no longer around to turn off.
This is so disturbingly accurate
Well, thanks for scaring the hell out of me😂
It wasn't?!
And the ship is slowly losing power.
me desperately trying to figure out which microphone is making which sound for 9 and a half minutes
I prefer the original version where this is performed a capella by wookiees
I'm sorry everyone, you can't unhear that.
George Baily yes I can
😂😂 👍👍
😂😂😂
Ah, finally, a new Pendulum album.
Well the last one was released in June, so...
hahaha
@@DylanTallchief SUCC
@@DylanTallchief the fuck are you doin here?
@@DylanTallchief Oh hi there!
This happens in my bathroom every freakin' night between the bathtub and the sink.
Lucky you
Sounds like a short
Your bathroom sounds haunted
I wonder if this piece received positive feedback? I wasn't a fan of the swung tempo, but I think the chorus was great.
woke up my pet whale.
killed my pet puffer ...
Suddenly craving a Sprite right now.
don't die tonight bro
ayyyy i see what you did there
I just wanna dance with you baby but don’t move too fast cause I’m too crazy
4:04 Good shit
Vince Staples - Norf Norf
Anyone else hearing it here?
yeah
ye
i love that we both listen to Reich and Staples, lol
I KNEW I'VE HEARD THIS SOMEWHERE
lmao
It's like listening to the entire birth and death of the universe in nine minutes.
word
What a humpty dumpty universe you live in.
*cough* Pretentious *cough*
give us your drugsss
*literally microphones swinging around* "This is so deep..."
The only thing that bothers ME is that the performers should have spoken to each other about what to wear.
+Nasro Subari Its intention is to eliminate the visual image in the performance.
That's such a 'youtube' criticism to make. It's so clearly not about how the performers look, and yet it's all you can talk about.
dog. it's a joke.
What if they did? :D
If they had, they would have worn concert black. It's about the music, not the performers.
Okay, I have to admit, this is actually clever.
my mom walked on me and started crying she thought i was in a cult or something
Omg that’s hilarious
And that's what concerts were like in the 60's
+Nick Kominitsky These concerts taught you how to listen and hear.
+Nick Kominitsky you mean Woodstock ? ;-)
Das Frankfurter Rhythm & Groove Weekend no, Throbbing Gristle
The mic drop made into an art form.
4:24 it randomly formed a kind of e minor arpeggio with the passing f#. I know it's nothing related to tempered tradicional music but it's funny to see these things happening randomly.
5 year old comment BUT that was most likely intentional. Considering the weight of the mics and where they start along with the pitches being pre determined there are defos larger harmonic moments that were planned to happen.
Entropy loves this
Sounded great. But the alternate camera angle, the closeup from the side, made me dizzy and didn't contribute to my understanding of the piece. I would have stuck with the original camera angle.
When you can't explain why you like something.
Sounds very different from the recording I've heard. I guess things like the lengths of the cables, closeness to the speakers and a number of other factors can totally change the way this piece sounds.
Robert Wilks The cable length doesn't really have much to do with the frequency that a mic feeds back (unless it's a really poor quality cable and then the noise piles up fast). Different mics and speakers all feed back at different frequencies regardless of the distance but they used the same speakers and mics for all four tones so I'm guessing it was intentionally EQed this way.
The length of the pendulum determines the period of its oscillation. The dimensions of the room and the distance from the microphone to the speaker affect the frequency of the feedback. As the angle that the pendulum moves through decreases, the period stays the same but the mic spends more time in proximity to the speaker. And then the doppler effect is what ultimately gives you that slide between pitches.
Sorry, I mostly wrote that for myself. This one sounds much different from the original because it looks like they took the time to do a lot of calculations in positioning everything so that the result would actually be in a key
The piece is all about random accidental music
i like that this version doesnt make me wanna commit suicide
@@kailalynch1223 it’s not really random because it’s a pendulum so the sounds themselves after you hear the original frequency can set up an expectation for the remainder of the piece as you know they will get longer and closer together as the pendulum swings in smaller amounts
Is it just me or does it seem like there's a problem with one of the microphones? I think one of them has a little bit of feedback.
The whole sound is made from feedback
@@alamooji3716 Congrats on finding the joke!
Put that on my YANKEE WITH NO BRIIM
They dropped the mic...
Badum-tsss
:3
Music is nothing but an art form whose medium is sound. If you say this isn't music, then there can be no music. Simply because there is no carefully considered choice of chords or words or rhythms does not make it any less viable than anything else. Instead of creating a finite, individual song, Reich's created an infinitely variable concept that can be played by literally anyone.
Isn't that simply stunning? Without any professional training, just a very basic explanation, you can play a piece of music that encompasses a highly advanced concept, that of chaos? The same goes for John Cage's "4:33" that I've seen mentioned below. That piece should never be "performed" by an individual, just showcased to a participating audience. This is still groundbreaking now, 57 years after its' creation. That says a lot.
Of course it is music, but to say it's good music or impressive music is something that the public mind I think tells you the most about. That public hasn't changed its opinion. Art snobs will always be art snobs, and tell you that anything can have a profound meaning as long as you attach the right story to it. The artist can do what it wants, but this piece doesn't enlighten me in the slightest.
Torchkas-alt I personally would say this piece is more about being interested in the sound and the effects of chance than enlightenment. Not aware of a profound story or message attached to it either. Which isn't to say you need to like it of course, it's a matter of personal taste.
It's not unheard of for members of the public to spend untold sums of money to watch their idol lip sync their way through a song they didn't write. You'll forgive me if I make my own mind up.
at 8:35 norf norf by vince staples sample
horrible camerawork. amazing music. i'm a huge fan of reich.
I see a lot of nay-sayers, and all I want to say is the idea was from-19 bloody-68. Call it what you want, but there is at least genuine novelty to be had here. The arbitrary universal laws of motion, the phase incoherence, the one-shot chaotic element... Its more stage art than music, but sheesh, in the meantime all we're fed are samples of the late n' greats under obvious 2/4 phrases marred by forced rhyme. I think I'd rather listen to this (done infinite times with varying distances and pitches through the speakers ect) than the radio. If all I get anyway is soulless, I'd rather hear an interpretation of the universe. PS, at least Reich didn't try to copyright silence, lol.
***** But Steven made music out of it.
I think this doesn't have soul. This snobby "endless experimentation" that got kickstarted in the late 19th century doesn't have any more soul than the modern music business does. Steve Reich's music is designed to give an impressive or intrigued emotion, but it doesn't last. The art itself doesn't actually have any substantial meaning from Reich's part. He just did it because endless experimentation is art. There's no emotion or soul put into this, even if you can think of countless of descriptions after the fact, that doesn't matter anymore. I'll take minimalism and the ability of an artist to limit themselves over this pretentious snobbery any day. I'll agree that radio is probably not much better than this, but that doesn't say much.
In many ways I agree with you. Unsurprisingly I feel a little different a year after I wrote that. No, Steve did not put any "emotion" or "soul" into it. This is more like the musical equivalent to a Jackson Pollock or a Rorschach, where if done a million times *could* get a million different emotions out of you, the viewer. It's kinda like the old Sufi mystic proverb... "Who is the great sage who makes all the grass green." You, my friend, are the one who makes meaning out of static.
"at least Reich didn't try to copyright silence," Sam Wise 2015. A quote that I'm going to have to use one day
You might hate me foer that but give this piece a drum beat and you get perfect samples for a rap song
Not bad. Pretty nice piece of drone music.
+Andrew Mohler the end sounds like the cry of a wounded beast tbh
+Jacob Schwartz I can hear that.Prescient.
this music sound like a bad case of growing anxiety and I really like it. I am weird, yes, but this is cool.
crazy how clams turned this into a crip anthem
Surprisingly engaging.
There's even some sense of resolution when they accidentally line up together, or when finally in the end all of them line up to produce one blob of noise.
This is a set piece built in 1966 but performed con-temporarily. Today's artists just don't have the same mind set to start the mics swinging as they did back in the glorious 1960's. It's all in the wrist.
Thanks all girls and guy for your comments. Here you'll find the last version we have done at the Fine Art School in Le Mans (France), with students...
th-cam.com/video/HTlm2bpbd8Q/w-d-xo.html
Yume Nikki’s OST in a nutshell
The score is a simple bit of text stating that the mics should all be released at the same time, thus making the element of phase more apparent to the listener. I'm really glad this video was made and presented, I just hope next time it will be done correctly!
hehe hi Drew
@@liamoconnell2375 Lol Hi Liam! Here I was 5 years ago being pedantic! lol.
"the score"
lol, ok dude
0:44
Taking *DROP THE BEAT* to a whole new level
Hahaha
Half-Life 2 sounds
If you let yourself get brought in by this when the microphones slow down it hits harder than any beat drop in music before, I can see why Vince sampled it.
It hasn’t been officially confirmed that it was used in “Norf Norf,” though, nor which recording it was that was sampled, but mad props to Clams Casino for that beat! Peace.
BITCH YOU THIRSTY, PLEASE GRAB A SPRITE
Sounds like my neighbours-they have a lot of children.
Are they Whales?
genuinely sounds like a dying god. i'm in love with this piece.
Love this piece of music! Very pleasant to listen to and watch!
FUCK TH-cam STABILIZATION!
Vince staples - norf norf
Jay rock - kings dead
how is it kings dead i dont hear it
Surely Kraftwerk had something to do with this... or vice-versa?
this is what you can't learn through your teacher.
need mental peace and think like a kid who wants to go out and play after 3-4hrs of mathematics.
Weird. They didn’t follow the part of the instructions which says: ‘Performers then sit down to watch and listen to the process along with the audience.’
Pendulum Music, Reorchestrated.
I don't understand but here from TOP instgram 😂😂
Did Vince Staples sample this particular 'performance'? His song 'Norf Norf' uses similar sounds and he used it to great effect, creepy and ominous.
Yep this is the sample source for Norf Norf
At times, it reminded me of a Cliff Burton solo...
norf norf
where can I find the notation?
There's an article about it in the Smithsonian magazine. Try Googling "5 1/2 examples of experimental musical notation".
Why does anyone say this isn't music? Sounds like it's got a pretty clear beat and melody to me, it sounds a lot like early electronic music, which I guess is exactly what it is. Yeah, the melody and rhythm aren't in the score for the music and it not only changes with each performance but over the course of the piece, but so what? Something that is easy to identify as music emerges from the piece, and so it is music.
Check out Norf Norf by Vince Staples. He made it into a song
fr, classical pieces like this as well as late 60s guitar players (esp Jimi Hendrix) intentionally manipulated feedback to generate specific notes and harmonics and sounds. wouldn't have ever had any of the rock music from the 70s-90s or the hip hop from 2016-now without their innovations
+lulubelle padieu each of speakers placed pointing upwards on the floor is connected to the microphone which hangs directly above it. As the microphone swings past the speaker it creates a feedback loop which produces the sound you hear, as the speaker swings away the loop is effectively broken and the sound stops. The longer a microphone spends directly above it's own speaker, the longer the feedback sound will be heard.
That's some high quality trap instrumental right there
Funny you should say that
@@newport_reds Is Norf norf actually sampling the last part of this video ? th-cam.com/video/mb6Jc4juSF8/w-d-xo.html
Alternate title: "Whales Mating"
PFFT- 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Norf Norf
Keep in mind that Steve Reich has composed a huge number of pieces. for all kinds of ensembles--traditional and otherwise.
Much better than I initially expected, even as a Reich fan!
FrogmortonHotchkiss nice profile pic
No but actually, you could expand and experiment on this concept and make some pretty great music. 4:00 - 5:00 was especially good.
Norf Norf by Vince Staples samples this, check it out
This really feels like a uni students getting stoned and coming up with the best way to create an assignment submission without having to do any actual work.
the 4 minute mark is the greatest
first question: why only three voices when I see four mic?
Second question would be: Why to upload a video when the installation is not working well?
David Dalmazzo Watch the outermics. They're very close in period and thus appear to be one voice, but the small difference in frequency creates a sort of glissando between the two voices that is strong enough to create the sound if one voice with a sort of sliding dynamic.
it would be interesting to work with syncing pendulums on a moving platform. ive got to try that now
1:05 hey Vsauce Michael here
Honestly, I had to keep listening just to hear how it was going to wind up. Ah, marijuana and PBS. The 60s were awesome. :-)
Wtf this is actually good, theres some semblance of melody and progression even tho this is pretty random/kinda stochastic
I thought the 'phasing' would be more dramatic. Pendulums were too similar in length.
They fucked up... they all had one job and the timing was off... c'mon
What I've learned from this, is that like the mics, you must let things go. That's when life happens.
Imagine they would have sung along some song as the mic would have travelled near them... That's Some Doppler Pendulum Music
Friend: What instrument do you play?
Me: I play the microphone.
Friend: You mean you sing?
Me:
Friend:
i know i saw this happen but i don't get how this song happened
Where's the excitement in the performers? The "Oh man this is gonna sound so cool!" factor? They all look so up-tight or bored with it. This is awesome stuff! There needs to be some happiness, eagerness, or something in the presentation.
+c0rv377 That's sort of the blank canvas performer approach. Steve Reich wrote a duet to be performed by gravity and inertia themselves. The humans are secondary to the performance. So they stay quiet and blank inorder to let the mechanism itself perform.
Either that or they're just stuck up orchestral types. :)
+c0rv377 no. No false smiles.
coz they know its gonna suck
Just a little feedback here:
Not every idea
Is a great idea
Just because it's an idea.
But not all music
That I don't want to hear again
Is bad music.
Some people talk
as though one or the other of those statements
Must be the truth.
But I believe
Both of them
Are.
+theRealPlaidRabbit When you comment on a post, it puts it slightly higher up the thread.
Spaces don't need to be replaced with pressing the Enter Key.
Au contraire. They begged me personally.
I was reluctant at first, but they would not be denied
So I complied,
Knowing the danger, and risking looking like a total doofus,
for the greater good of the universe.
it makes it hard to read
when you push
the enter
key
when you
should
not
For whom? I found your reply perfectly easy to read.
Maybe it's harder to see things from atop a high horse.
I love this. I can imagine some interesting projected poetry on the walls
My dog is barking. He likes it too.
Where exactly is the part that was used in Vince Staples' beat?
shecheyer could possibly be another performance
Whosampled says it's at 1:49, I think it's heavily chopped though.
yo nobody told me going to a community collage online art class stoned would be a religious experience
We are not aliens. Let's not pretend to be something we clearly are not.
I half expected there to be a round of applause at the end. I want to try this live as the encore.
Here from T.O.P
same lol
Vipere same haha
Vipere saame
This might sound like a stupid question, how was the room recorded?
Interesting random music experience. This type of «musiqie» brings us back perhaps to the origins of the very first musical creations of our distant ancestors. Up to a certain point, this type of sound material makes me think of «prinitive» music, that said without pejorative intention, which musical ethnologists have made possible to make discover to the general public, through the intermediary of certain peoples who practice or had practiced this kind of music. It is perhaps a matter of updating the genesis of all music, up to ours. This being said, it is likely that I overstepped the composer’s intention. It would have been relevant to know his point of view on this subject..
SACRIFICE THE MICROPHONES TO THE SPEAKER GODS
It's nice how the tempo doesn't change but the 'notes' get stretched.
This is due to the fact that an ideal pendulum doesn't change frequency.
Is there a digital version of this effect? I don't think there is.
Way better than Justin Bieber
Being better than justin bieber is like finishing the first stat of an game, as you discover how to play the game you will eventually do it.
Have you heard the 800% version?
Zeacorzeppelin10 No waayyy Einstein!
Only vince staples fans understand
Norf norf
Impresionante! y la tocaron toda de memoria!
I love this, but if somebody could explain to me the installation and how it works I'd be grateful :)
Came here from the Vince Staples - Norf Norf Sample!!
This is insaneeee...!!!!
Epic buddy
Sun Ra may cast light!!!
He didn't even make this piece
I aint never ran from nuthing but da police
po..potato♪nugget♪nugget♪nugget♪...
endless...
This is making me question everything about life...
I wonder what causes the changes in pitch. Is it just a particular microphone that happens to create feedback at a different pitch than the others?
fantacist maybe, also might be (and probably is) a few inches/centimeters in rope length that make the difference.
rick moranis fantacist the microphones all have the same frequency characteristics and pick-up pattern, so they will normally produce a similar sound. however, when you apply EQ to the microphone-signal, you can alter it's frequency-response. note that there are no high pitched tones audible. this strongly suggests that the amplified signal has been modified, through the use of an equalizer, which is used to either cut or boost frequencies from the audible spectrum.
I guess it's the Doppler effect
@Ashwin Rawat This piece is based on Larsen effect not Doppler effect (which is the one you hear in a car race… )
Is this the same instalation Dan Graham refeers in his book Rock my religion? (I'm not sure if it's actually an installation by himself).
how is here for the t.o.p photo on IG? xD
me haha
Seunghyun Choi 🙆🙆
Seunghyun Choi me.. and I was like seriously? Did he got his writing song inspiration from this kind of music?
“It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing” 😬