ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Judge Rules Illegal Immigrants Can Own Guns - Is That True?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ส.ค. 2024
- A judge appointed by President Obama in Illinois has recently ruled that illegal immigrants can own guns. What does this mean now and is the judge correct?
Freedom Over Everything shirt (code Mike for 10% off): mrgunsngear.org/4a4jrQb
Nine Line Apparel shirts: (discount code MRGUNS20): mrgunsngear.org/GNGNineLine
mrgunsngear
Telegram: t.me/Mrgunsngear
Facebook.com/Mrgunsngear or Facebook.com/GNGfacebook
parler.com/#/profile/Mrgunsngear
mrgunsngeargram
Email sign up:
Mrgunsngear.com
MRGNG.org
My Amazon store:
www.amazon.com/shop/mrgunsngear
Sign up for exclusive content on Mugclub (code mrgunsngear for a free month): mrgunsngear.org/40GEse9
My videos on WPSN: www.watchwpsn.com/mrgunsngear
To sign up for the Warrior Poet Society Network (code MRGUNS for 10% off): mrgunsngear.org/3nSuUJC
Music Epidemic Sound
Disclaimer: These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of anything demonstrated in my videos is done AT YOUR OWN RISK. All work on arms should be carried out by a licensed individual and all state and federal rules apply to such. We (including TH-cam) will not be held liable for any injury to yourself or damage to your arms resulting from attempting anything shown in any our videos. I do not endorse any specific product and this video is not an attempt to sell you a good or service. I am not a retail shop and DO NOT sell or deal in arms. Such a practice is heavily regulated and subject to applicable laws. I DO NOT sell parts, magazines, or arms. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately. By viewing or flagging this video you are acknowledging the above.
Fair Use: In the rare instance I include someone else’s footage it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.
![NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) - Reimagined [Live Session]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nY2PsFZFEOg/mqdefault.jpg)
Check out all the new stuff going on at Mrgunsngear.com 🇺🇸
Illegal criminal invading immigrants can be punished under federal law for improperly entering our country. If they are committing a felony by being here illegally, then what makes anyone think they can legally possess a firearm as no American Citizen that is a felon can possess a firearm?
This country and the rest of the world is fked. Illegals flooding in and destroying this country while our government just lays down and takes it. Unlawful entry into usa is a felony. Felons cant have guns. Ffs.
The 2A is more than ownership. How do illegals define tyranny?
They will use this against the 2nd Amendment.
When they blame the firearms , reframe it as not vetting the illegal.
Please continue to stand for the 2nd Amendment, even when your viewers have turned away because of their emotional responses to politics.
Every AMERICAN has the right to bear arms. Not everyone has the right to be an American. Period.
This!!
And who give YOU that right dumb dumb, unless you are a red skin like me you are just a anchor baby.
I agree, but I also think that everyone on this planet has the right to self defense. Why not use this court case against them when they try and disarm us? Remind them that even illegal aliens have the right to own a firearm for self defense, so there is no reason to remove that right from law abiding citizens.
So, it's not a natural, God-given right? The government is the one now granting rights?
Way to play yourself.
no, the constitution affirms the right of every american to bear arms - everyone has the right to bear arms, american or not. If they do something wrong, like be here, they should probably be sent back, but having a gun is not the wrong thing and should not be a charge against them.
This is a Trojan horse. What better way to get gun owners to call for gun control.
Exactly. This should be considered a win for gun owners.
They will use it to push universal background checks!!
Not a bad take on the issue.
@@GrumpyGenXGramps How would they use this to push universal background checks?
Exactly.
Not a word from dems about gun control when illegals can legally care .
This world is some crazy shit
Isn't that some crazy sh-t? Criminals and illegals have more rights than citizens??
BoR applies to all people, not just citizens.
It's just about antiwhitism
Love how quick YT took my comment down but scammers post live for days!
I think this is a back door to get the populace against the second amendment so they can rewrite the constitution or pass laws on the federal level that is largely supported due to increase chaos that they created
It's a hard pill to swallow that a person here illegally is getting more preferential treatment than our veterans and other legal citizens.
Aren't they trying to take away vets access to firearms right now too?!! Make it make sense 🤡
How are they getting preferential treatment? This ruling just allows them to possess firearms, nothing more.
Just wait. They will give them badges to enforce what the sherrifs won't. Watch.
@@mikebaggott7802 I think he means in general
@@outdoorfr3ak, If that's the case, he should be more clear as to what he is referring to. OTOH, he should comment on how this ruling affords more preferential treatment to illegal aliens. I see this as a positive. It affirms that the right to bear arms is universal.
You hit on the real answer. Do they have the human right to keep and bear arms? Yes. Do they have the right to be here? No. They have freedom of speech and religion here too, just just don't have the right to the "here" part.
Bingo
So someone of a tourist or student visa from Saudi Arabia should be able to buy an AK? They’re allowed to be here
@@user-ul1so3yy5l does the government have a right to prevent that Saudi student from practicing Islam?
@@user-ul1so3yy5lYes. It's part of the Bill of Rights. It applies to everyone, tourists, visa holders, everyone.
@@user-ul1so3yy5l yes.
As a former IL resident who was charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon for simply possessing a firearm without a valid FOID which expired while I was serving in Iraq in the army. Somehow, my renewal never made it to the state police and despite having copies that I had sent it. I was still subjected to a trial and $10k in legal fees. Still ended up with a misdemeanor for something that was perfectly legal in 49 other states that didn’t require a FOID card to simply own a firearm. My mistake for being a citizen and serving my country. At the time I was young and naive and didn't know that the left only punishes the law abiding.
We have them in NJ too
I hope you moved to Texas 🤘🏻
@@UnknownUser-fe5zuor any free state.
Thank you for your service and sorry for the injustice you suffered. Illegals procure their firearms illegally - evidently the idiot judge doesn't get that fact.
We will take you in Missouri. You can move right next door.
My family waited for 7 years for our visa to be approved before we came to the USA legally. And we are productive citizens who love America. I served in the military and now I’m a professional. This invasion is a slap in the face to the law abiding.
Of course this judge would throw all the books and the kitchen sink at YOU Joe Citizen should you get caught with with an unlicensed firearm in that state
The 2A is more than ownership. How do illegals define tyranny?
I am identifying as an illegal immigrant my family sneaked in to this country in 1734 and have been hiding out ever since.
Snuck. Not sneaked.
@@2ATodayhe is an immigrant. Give him a break to assimilate.
@@mindyourbusiness4101🤣🤣🤣
Wether you like it or not, you and your family are immigrants if not Native American
So you are an anchor baby?
arm yourself everybody and be ready to protect yourself
next up, can illegal immigrants VOTE? we all know why they ruled this way on the 2A and would gladly do so when it comes to the right to vote as well.
Voting isn't explicitly a human right, it's a privilege of citizenship.
@@Stevarooni semantics of language. Learn the definition of a right. Not all are universal. The right to vote comes with citizenship.
What? That's why they're here
@Stevarooni that is why they are here. Amongst other things you'll see this summer. Don't be naive.
Voting is specifically written as a right for citizens, not for the people, which gives it distinction from other rights.
Okay. The guy was arrested in Illinois, where there's no "Constitutional Carry", and the judge states he's good to go. What about the citizens of Illinois?
That's one of the next questions. This ruling is the best thing to happen in defense of our 2A rights in decades.
@khester7397 if you think that then you need to get a reality check. The system has now identified that natual born americans are the enemy and illegals are the true americans.
The 2A is more than ownership. How do illegals define tyranny?
Do they have the right to revolt?
@@khester7397 You'd think, but the government will have no problem saying *they* don't need a permit but you do. Just wait and see.
Absolute clown world
You did not being up the FOID, which is unfortunately a thing in IL. If immigrants do not need the FOID to own firearms, neither should anyone else.
It's a federal case. The state of Illinois can still bring charges on not having a FOID card.
@@rogerwood5228
The fact that none were brought in 2020 tells me everything.
Purchased from his neighbor he has stated.. All sales in the state require a backgnd check. 2nd law voliated w/o charges/
@@LostRuskkienot all states require a background check when purchasing a weapon via private party
@@FK-AIPAC Do some research. Illinois DOES require it. Precisely what the OP said about FOID.
The vast majority of the courts don't care what is constitutional........
I agree, the court system has become corrupted with agendas to destroy America and our way of life. Just think of how much blood was spilt on the altar of freedom for this all to take place now.🤯🤔
Can't even believe this is a talking point.... Sovereignty means nothing?!?
It's not about sovereignty. Are our rights natural, secured by the BoR, or not?
They will have badges soon. To enforce what the sherrifs wont
That's lolbertarians for you
Under the 14A, we should own everything the military should own. The NFA and the GCA must be put aside.
Surprisingly, I don't want my mortal enemies to be armed. It is that simple
Lmao. Seethe that rights are for everyone. You’re not special, little snowflake
You sound exactly like a leftist.
@@sqwk2559 Did you see the video of them rushing the border in TX recently? I don't want them to have firearms and I'm definitely NOT a LEFTIST.
Sounds like a Libtard
@@sqwk2559 u lolbertarian are batshit crazy
It’s a God given right not to be taken away from the government, but the government can deport the mofos like they’re supposed to.
By The Government…
Is that what you meant to post?
Just building their cartel-trained army...shit's about to get real...
I encourage everyone talking about ‘legal immigration’ to research that ‘golden era’ of immigration everyone is thinking about. You’ll discover that they had strict caps on the number, in 1910 it was limited to 3% of a given nationality’s representation in America. We’re getting numbers annually over the southern border what took 10 back then. We need a TOTAL moratorium on all immigration until we sort this mess out.
They were also European descended with compatible cultures.
The (((Hart Cellar Immigration Act of 1965))) was aimed at reducing the White population of the country.
It has been turning the country into a third world country.
@@WinterInTheForest and those European immigrants did not depend on the welfare system because it didn't exist back then. If they couldn't find a way to make it, then that was it. The End.
I think a sticky part of this is the whole "well they havent been convicted of a crime yet" argument. If youve crossed a countrys border without visa or invitation you've broken the law by definition
So, you don't believe in due process. got it.
@khester7397 that's impressive really, someone proved my point about it being sticky in less than an hour.
It still requires a conviction, and, unless this is a repeat arrest for him, it's only a misdemeanor, not a felony.
Many are let in while they wait for a court hearing to see if they get to stay. They walk up to the fence and law enforcement opens, cuts, lifts the fence. We have all seen the videos. Some certainly are bad people sneaking back and forth. But the debate should be about stopping the immigration at points other than legal ports of entry. And getting back to being able to walk into a business and pay cash for a machine gun, if you so choose, and leave without having to jump thru hoops. It really is two separate problems. Stop the illegal immigration solves both problems. Making possession of a firearm illegal accomplishes nothing.
People get thrown in jail for jaywalking. Should they be restricted by that logic?
Not only is he not a citizen for not being able to have a gun he’s also a felon for being here illegally. He’s not supposed to be in the country so he should be arrested then deported after his sentence. Period .
1. What happened to “gun rights are human rights?” Or does that only apply when it’s convenient for you?
2. Being here illegally is a misdemeanor, not a felony.
3. You’re clearly incapable of having an original thought of your own, so it doesn’t surprise me you just recite all the talking points of the fudds you THINK have your rights in mind
It's not a felony unless he has entered multiple times after being kicked out. First time is just a misdemeanor.
@@MGMan37check again it is a felony to enter America illegally.
@@MGMan37 ok true it’s not a felony 1 st time but there’s a fine not more than 2.000 and or 6 months in prison. So he’s still not a citizen to own a gun plus he can still be punished then deported .
This country becomes smaller everyday. The longer I live the more I think the best of this country was left on the battlefields this country has chosen to engage in.
-RLTW Airborne
Yet the ATF just no-knocked a guy to death in the middle of a affluent suburb.
Something doesn’t add up here.
I think it's pretty clear what's going on when you think about it
I think that anyone should be able to own, carry, and use a gun no matter who you are or where you are. You
Should be able to go into a store and buy a gun the same as a pack of chewing gum. If you are here illegally you should be made to leave, that’s the part the courts are missing.
Exactly
Without a background check
You sound fucking stupid!!! I bet you will change your mind when one of these illegals rob you.
The 2A is more than ownership. How do illegals define tyranny?
Do they have the right to revolt?
Illegals as Well?
It's not just Hispanic foreign nationals breaking into America; we've also got Chinese and Middle Eastern foreign nationals as well sneaking across the border. A friend of mine in a small town owns a gun store. He just told me a crazy story. A couple of weeks ago several Syrians, lacking passport, drivers license or visa, attempted to purchase firearms from him. He reported it to the alphabet agencies--the FBI, ATF, and ICE--and none of them could or would do anything about it. If this is true, then we should all be prepared for the eventuality of a terrorist attack in America. Maybe before the year is out. And all this for what?! So the Democrats can grant them voting rights and solidify their power base?! Very scary times we are living in.
It is being done on purpose, America is being attacked and we don't even realize it ,the people who are really in control know this and want America to fail.
This guy also shot his gun at passing cars this is being left out.
He shot at someone who owed him drug money...and the judge ruled the illegal "is not a sufficient threat to society".
Source?
So does that mean constitutional carry is in effect across the board?!
Yup! ALL 50 states! Hell the globe!
Only for illegals
Not if you're a citizen of this country. Especially not if you are a tax paying law abiding citizen.
It damn well should!
No, it means you don't have to be a citizen to have property rights or the right of self-defense. This has always been the case.
Only certain law violations allow government to violate your rights to weapons. Criminal invasion is not one of those violations.
They tread a fine line here. If they show these laws are null and void for illegals than citizens will refuse to comply. It could get very messy.
Well that makes it clear. We are a free to carry whatever and whenever. Thanks, Illinois!
Then do away with the 4473 background check.
FJB......I CAN NOT SAY ENOUGH
What the hell is going on? This is nuts.
It’s called “Fundamental Transformation”.
They want you to be in danger and afraid so you’ll relent and submit to giving up the 2a. They’re playing chess by arming tens of millions of criminals
Lock N Load!
"The right of the people" can't we assume "the people" means Americans. It is the constitution of the United States of America, not the constitution of the people of other countries.
I agree but the argument all these idiots make these days to disparage the US is “the whole continent is America” and “you stole the land” and “Texas belongs to Mexico” and many more BS talking points they spew. It should be a citizen’s right only.
That’s what I said. The preamble says “We the people OF the United States.”
THE CONSTITUTION IS FOR LEGAL CITIZENS! These judges should be unseated for not upholding it.
Colorado taking firearms away..
Banning firearms coming in August.
What duty does the government have if not to keep America safe and prevent an invasion?
America is getting ravaged my friends!! We appreciate you MrGunsngear!! Texas is fighting the battle on our own apparently
Lawless , Let us all be armed to defend our selves !
No
Then make sure you syay outta the way@sharpshiell
@@sharpshiellyes
Let us first be educated. Simple things like knowing how to spell ourselves properly.
If you can't spell, you probably shouldn't be trusted with a firearm.
@@Democrats_are_a_disease I know a lot of educated killers that never used guns some so brilliant they could send others to go to war with foreign countries so I don’t think you really need to know how to spell to be a killer some of the first people on horseback with guns didn’t know how to read or write but had guns and were probably outlaws but aye
I came to the US legally 20 years ago. Paid good amount of money and went through a long exhausting period of time to become a US citizen. Coming here illegally they're braking immigration law, why would they be allowed to purchase a firearm?
Because shall not be infringed applies to people you don't like, too
Nos2113- No
@Nos2113 not one said these people are unlikable. When you break the law you kind of give up some of your rights
Because Dems need votes so bad they'll support perfidy.
@@TheRad4manthys Only after you're convicted. Even then, the 2nd amendment disagrees.
This judge needs to be disbarred. Removed from judicial seat. And maybe even prosecuted.
It seams like common sens is not part of the discussion in leagal debates....illigal immigrants must become citizen of USA in order to have rhe same rights as a USA citizens....simple and straight forward....no complication.....wake up.
Je crois que anglais n’est pas votre premiere langue.
Not true, an illegal immigrant already enjoys the protection of the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments.
By your logic illegal immigrants have no rights at all and can even be enslabed. You’re stupid
Our constitution applies to US citizens. End of story.
The constitution gives us the right to bear arms, not the Bible.
"A moral and religious people"
Go ask the people of China, or even Canada for that matter. The cold hard reality is we live in a world that is governed by people, and it’s up to us to keep it free.
@callsignjoker2686it secures a divine right by "we the people" , the USA. America isnt a world state. They can have their natural rights secured else where.
Natural universal law provides everyone the right to self defense. The US constitution original intent was to limit the power of government. Not provide you rights.
They are not even citizens... WTHHHHH 🤯
That pesky constitution doesn't get in the way of firearms ownership
Self defense and property rights aren't established by the constitution. They are only states by the constitution
"The right of _the People_ to keep and bear arms" rather than citizens. It's a human right. But yes, they're not citizens and should be deported with prejudice.
The 2A is more than ownership. How do illegals define tyranny?
Do they have the right to revolt?
@@logangodofcandy🤡
Agree 100% with your position on the matter, it's common sense.
Which ain't so common these days.
It clearly says, "we the people of THE UNITED STATES". If you're not a person of the United States, you're not included in that. How a judge wouldn't understand that is beyond me. Guess she never read the damn thing.
Have you read the Federalist Papers? Also, there is far more to law than picking out a single word from the Declaration of Independence and making a ruling based solely upon that.
Do you believe our rights outlined in the Bill of Rights come from the government? If so, and thus, only protect certain people, that document should be renamed to the "Bill of Privileges". I believe people are conflating these two separate issues. Human rights (which are natural or God given) can exist just fine while still deporting people who are here illegally.
Did you know that while in the US (not of the US), you are protected by the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, etc. Amendments, even if you aren't a citizen? That being the case, why wouldn't the 2nd Amendment be included with the rest? If you feel it's because guns are different and should be treated differently than all other rights, you might be on the anti-gun side. Just something for you to think about.
@@bewbew0016 Have you read the Anti-Federalist papers? Regarding the Federalist, keep this in mind: "the legitimate meaning of the Instrument must be derived from the text itself".
Regarding being protected while in the US despite not being a citizen, the 3rd, 5th, and 6th amendments refer to "any house/owner", "no person", and "the accused", which is how those amendments apply to everyone. The 1st is kind of mixed because the first portion before the colon applies to all persons, whereas after colon only "the people" have the ability to peaceably assemble and to petition the government. This is supported by the preamble, where it begins with "We the people OF the United States". The other amendments, like the 8th for example, don't specify who it applies to, so it is understood that it applies to everyone.
Did the constitution apply to members of the various Native Nations in the 1800s or does it now? Just something for you to think about.
@@TrackSol Yes, but my point in bringing that up was specifically the publications relevant to the Second Amendment. Actually, supporting this specific case or not, I think everyone should read it. I would assume you have, given your mention of the Anti Federalist Papers.
Regarding your arguments, we can go into great legal depth which quite honestly, would require both of us having JDs and have been focusing our practices in constitutional law. I don't know about you, but I haven't.
As for the last paragraph, I'm not certain of the point you're making. Especially with that being the case over 200 years ago and having since been determined to be unconstitutional (which it was). Again though, it seems like the point is that it would apply to non citizens the way it did 200 years ago to native Americans? Because the reasons behind that were both racist in some ways, and in others, don't apply to the current situation. I don't want to assume that's your position. Until we start becoming unable to travel without a high likelihood of coming under attack from a group on illegal aliens, much of that doesn't apply to this situation. Even then, I wouldn't be likely to agree with disarming all of them unless a large enough number of them, acting in a coordinated way, sufficient to deem them as enemy combatants. In which case, I would be out there with my "friends of silly geese", acting as a combatant against them, as I would consider it to be a legitimate conflict. Though I do consider what's happening now to be an invasion and extremely dangerous, I consider it to be a separate issue from gun rights. As in, you don't have the right to be here, and though you are being removed, you still have basic human rights. Technically, while being removed, you would be a prisoner and thus, be disarmed for the duration of us holding you. Before and after that, I believe they all have the right to be armed.
Anyway, I think this comes down to your personal philosophy. Mine is (to put it simply) that gun rights are human rights. Because they are human rights, like all others, they are rights that all humans have, no matter where in the world they are, with a few limited exceptions. The exceptions being a current prisoner (including POWs), and possibly part of a very recent post-war treaty which would only apply to their military forces, and not their citizens, and only for things like specific offensive military equipment. I believe if you're here in the US (for example) legally, but not a citizen, you should be able to carry. If you commit a crime while here and are removed, that is a separate issue. The same goes for those here illegally. They have the right to carry (as I said earlier) and them being here is a separate issue. Just as, they have the right to pray to whatever God they wish.
I do realize, of course, that while these are inherent rights, governments in various countries will (and do) infringe upon those and many other rights, such as speech, religion, assembly, protests, etc. I believe, given the many historical examples, (including your own) that gun control is firmly rooted in racism and classism. Even when the disarming of citizens is to allow tyranny, the underlying reasons for the groups they target is almost always racist &/or classist.
So, the real question that it all boils down to, regardless of legal arguments, is do you believe that everyone has the right to keep and bear arms? Or, are you in support of gun control? It sounds like you do support gun control, but I don't want to put words in your mouth. That's why I've asked you plainly and simply. Also, if that is your belief, I'm not suggesting you're racist or classist. My argument regarding that is towards the motivations of the government. Sometimes, it's also the motivations of the individual citizens who support gun control, but I'm certainly not even insinuating they are yours. Just to be perfectly clear.
By the way, I appreciate that, though we appear to disagree, your response was intelligent and respectful. I hope mine was taken the same way, as was intended.
Wasn’t the Constitution written for the Citizens of the US? Can vacationers from Europe buy firearms too?
As long as they stay past 6month visa then they are illegal aliens and can get a gun😂
Yes they can if they have the correct documentation.
Deport!
On December 2nd 2023 I passed my state's ( South Carolina ) CWP class . Earlier this month our Governor signed into law our version of Constitutional Carry as the 29th state to do so . One stipulation of our gun laws are that the the carrier may not be trespassing on any property . Illegal aliens are trespassers on US soil and should not be able to own or carry firearms anywhere .
This is all part of the process to grant them the right to vote.
"IT'S A TRAP!" You are so right.
And to legally arm them with free guns
To illegally steal another election
They can already vote in the states with no voter ID requirements.
@@551defm not legally, though. They only state that allows illegal immigrants to vote is California and that's only for state elections. Federal election law forbids it.
This should be taken to the Supreme Court along with National Constitutional Carry or National Reciprocity
Sales can be denied for any reason with no explanation given. Gun counter salesmen, you know what to do.
You really think they are filling out a 4473 for these sales? They are buying stolen guns.
That's another slippery slope.
Yes
@@Taprack13 How? I Know, They'll Just Go To Another FFL. But It Will Help
Immediately all foid and conceal carry requirements need to be thrown out. CONSTITUTIONAL carry!
Rules don’t apply to criminals
That judge needs to be disbarred immediately.
fair enough
Agreed.
Self-defense (aka the right to arms) is a God-given right
Does that include illegals?
@@synapse1able Obvi
They can have it in their own country not ours
I agree with you 100% on everything you said. Capt. (retired US Army)
advantage of being a citizen: Paying taxes
Arming our invaders sounds pretty damn stupid. This country is completely done.
I'm guessing you subscribe to replacement theory?
When illegal immigration far exceeds birth rates of the native born Americans I’d call that replacement. Plus these people have zero desire to uphold American values or the constitution so yeah we have some serious problems.
@@Nos2113yeah wake up, look at Europe.
@@Nos2113it’s not a theory when they keep telling us what they’re doing.
Its not stupid, its the plan, they are bringing in between 1.4 and 2+ MILLION illegals per year, most of them fighting age men, within the Biden presidency ALONE thats over 10 million men, thats more than the US and Chinese military forces COMBINED. Now, the govt has stockpiled guns and ammo, guess who will be armed with those guns and ammo...
Best way to build an army inside another country.
When the officials are picking and choosing what law they will or will not address, it shows the corruption goes all the way to the top.
Her ruling should only get him out of the Federal charge. Doesn't Illinois require a permit to carry?
People entering our country without permission should have NO constitutional rights.
Uh, that's not true.
Q: Are civil rights only for Americans or does it also include foreigners and immigrants? Kimberly from Nevada
A: Yes, Civil Rights in the United States includes protections for everyone- Americans, visitors, immigrants, myself and you! Civil Rights -within the context of American history- began as a fight for the rights of marginalized groups; beginning as an African-American movement to combat racism, discrimination and segregation in the United States against Black Americans and proved inspirational to Civil Rights Movements that included other POC, such as the American Indian Movement, Chicano Movement, etc. In short, anyone regardless of citizenship, residency or immigration status can “have” Civil Rights in the United States as they are protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
Not true. All people deserve Basic human rights.
@@davidbanik3488 the Constitution and bill of rights is written for citizens of the U.S. while yes they should have rights which are given by God, the rights and privileges that we share as US citizens should not be extended to them. In this example, a firearm. An illegal immigrant should not be allowed to own a firearm.
That’s not the base of the ruling: the government can’t invoke restrictions that did not exist before the Constitution.
And if they can have arms. I can have "regulated" arms without prior permission or registration.
Background checks are illegal in violation of article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment,14th amendment section 1.
Indeed
Funny how they can rush concluding _this_ but apparently its ok if we have background check or the NFA being an infringements🤔
Succinctly put, these are two separate issues combined to scratch surface level politics. Divide and conquer.
Exactly. They want you to be hostile to the people they are letting in. They are hoping you'll lose your cool and do something stupid over it.
@@glumberty1 well or they simply want to divide the opposition that is the 2A community. Again, these issues are separate and should be handled as such. Deport criminal aliens, stop the invasion, support gun rights for Americans.
To demand your own rights are protected but are ok with anyone else's rights being infringed, is illogical. Illogical thinking is for children.
We are demanding that the government enforce the laws equally. If an illegal who is not a citizen can lawfully possess a firearm without a background check or permit, than every single American citizen should be able to as well. The government cannot claim it's an inherent right for the illegal but at the same time a privilege requiring government permission by permit for citizens.
@@oblivionsa7973 I support border security as well. We agree on the other thing too. Be well friend.
… so wait- does this mean I can go to Mexico or Canada and own a firearm?
Of course not! Those nations enforce the law in regards to illegal immigration!
Those country's banned firearms for its citizens so as not to cause the government consternation as did Israel who now have 1500 regrets and counting (deaths). until terrorists illegality invaded their country border and gifted unarmed Israelis citizens with *ape ,*urde and kidnapping . In Bidens America it's been giving monies, travel to all military age men from all enemy countries. When Americans die then investigations. Result ! Promotions for everyone as in Afghanistan.
Love your channel. Thank you for all that you do.
did y’all just see the immigrants storm the texas national guard at the border in el paso!?
And a bunch of dudes in these comments are like "hell yeah bruther give them guns" 🤦🏻
@@basedhardhands crazy man where ever you are stay safe and keep your head on a swivel with this bs we are going through
@@basedhardhands Lol. You think gun control laws work. You're willing to let the goons redefine the inherent right to self-defense as a government granted privilege in exchange for their promises of safety. Pathetic.
@@basedhardhands 🙄 i can't even this is exactly why i left the cult known as lolbertarianism 5 years ago
1.6 - 2+ million per year, mostly men below 40, thats a very large army being brought in.
Bingo.
🤡
🤡
They cannot even purchase them legally without an address and id and passing a background check.
The people are simply not the government. We need to enforce the laws we already have like we did with horse theft.
I will no longer comply with unjust edicts from an illegitimate government.
Life in the 2020’s is like a fever dream. Hold onto your seat!
Arming your enemy is a losing strategy!
Illegal...🧐 that pretty much should sum it up shouldnt it?
I wonder what happens when an immigrant fills it out and says yes on citizen status. Bet it passes. Maybe conspiracy minded but mistakes happen.
If true, then there is no way they are serious about gun control!
You gonna need them to protect your country because the way things go, you’re not gonna have enough soldier
Not many more pro 2a than me, but id have to say no. If your first act of entering the country is a crime then no. Then theres the fact that these people arent being vetted, so are they going through NICS? i think not. I dont want no cartel members packin
Don’t claim to be pro 2a and then add but with some type of stipulation. Bottom line, you’re not pro 2a, you’re pro 2a for anyone you see as fit, no different than the tyrants trying to take guns from those of us who are actually pro 2a.
So, you're all for gun control. Then, yes, there are many who are far more pro 2A than you, thankfully.
You are aware our rights aren't granted to us by the government, right? The right of the people to keep and bear arms is just that. You also don't appear to care about due process and support removing rights from people who committed a crime.
That's fine, it's your right, but you aren't pro 2A. I mean, if you can call someone who supports hate speech laws "pro free speech", then I suppose you can be called "pro 2A". I just don't call those people pro free speech. I call them something else.
I'll take your same mentality and apply it to the 4th Amendment. Not many are more pro 4th Amendment than me, but I'd have to say no. If the police feel you might have committed a crime or you did in the past, they should just be able to search you, your vehicle, or your home. I don't want no criminals to be able to hide nothing. Like the "not seas" said, if you got nothing to hide, you got nothing to worry about.
Doesn't sound very pro 4th Amendment, does it? I think I've made my point. I hope you give it serious consideration. Do you want dangerous freedom, or something else?
You dont have to go through NICS if you buy from private sales.
@@MGMan37Actually, you dont. Private person to person sales you dont have to, you just have to know the person you're selling to is legal or its a crime.
We are being invaded! Yhis is one reason we own guns. NO INVADERS SHOULD NOT HAVE GUNS!
Duly noted
Arming our invaders and paying for it with our tax money this country has gone Demonicly Insane
@@MrgunsngearIt's true. I hope you and others are prepared.
yes the invaders have been here for decades and they’re all aipac members and affiliates
They will get them regardless of laws
I agree. Why is he in court and not on a bus?
How can you do a background check on someone that isn’t in the system?
Right now the only difference is Susan and has to pay taxes and illegal doesn’t but they get all the same everything else
Judge should be disbarred.
Appreciate the rundown, thanks for the great summary. Without a doubt, most things that are happening these days are creating a lot of questions and challenging a lot of beliefs for many people. Unfortunately, things are getting crazy to the point that ideological debate just isn't possible in the heat of the moment, which is something that seems to be forgotten amongst the comments sometimes.
I totally agree thanks for having integrity.
Watch them apply for suppressors and get same day approvals
File the e-form from a mobile phone before the border crossing. That way it’s packaged and ready for pick up from the FFL the next day while en route North…
I agree and always have that ALL gun law's are un-Constitutional. My thing is that if they are not going to follow the NFA then do away with it and everything attached to it. period.
You said this was going to be a master class in losing subscribers yet I found myself subscribing.
Good info as always! Keep it up man!
That guy gets to ignore federal law, but if I don’t pay a tax stamp for an accessory or length change I’ll lose my rights? That’s messed up
'Tax stamp'= extortion fee, just goes to show its not about safety it's about control
You are close to seeing that all gun rights restrictions are unconstitutional.
Thank you for this video! You are the largest voice I have heard that is correctly breaking down this ruling. This precedent is a direct precursor to removing background checks which is a huge step in the right direction
You're very welcome
There is no way anyone is going to remove background checks, and certainly not because of this ruling.
You really think that's how this is going to play out? You think the same people who have been trying to disarm you for decades are going to all of a sudden say "we're going to abolish the nfa" and all the other things you want to hear because they want illegal immigrants to have guns?
This will never be used as precedence to preserve or restore citizens' 2A Rights. That's an extremely myopic and naive idea.
This is so messed up for Americans who may have lost 2nd amendment rights (which never should have happened) for a drug charge 20 years ago with a perfectly clean record but still can’t get a firearm.
I know of a couple different families who immigrated here from parts of Asia decades ago for a better life. They are now trying to get citizenship in places like Panama and elsewhere because they feel our nation is quickly going down the tubes and they are prepared to abandon ship. It's scary to see just how far we've fallen in just a couple decades.