Abu Bakr, Umar & The First Conquest | 632CE - 644CE | The Birth of Islam Episode 04
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- With their beloved Prophet gone, the Muslim community, in mourning, had to find a way to move forward but first, they had to agree on a successor to Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah.
In this video, we look at the expansion of Muhammad's empire from Arabia to Baluchistan in the East and Tunisia in the West. The early Islamic conquests changed the landscape of the world and created a pretty stable empire for a decent amount of time. It's the reason Muslims are found pretty anywhere other than Arabia. It's the reason today, Muslims are like a quarter of the world population.
There will be a separate video discussing why Muhammad's successors decided to expand their empire and why they were so successful at it. It's one of the most fascinating things in history how these traders and shepherds who couldn't read or write, living in a hellish landscape could win battles against the world's two superpowers.
Additional Facts:
1) There were no additional facts in this video because my computer was being bitchy and slowing down so couldn't add them.
Don't forget to like, comment, share and subscribe.
Disclaimer: The maps and flags in the video are not 100% accurate. Some maps and flags are difficult to find and so, are estimations.
Be sure to check out my Patreon Page. Even if you can't pledge, still visit it and check out the content I'll post there.
/ almuqaddimahyt
/ almuqaddimahyt
/ almuqaddimahyt
/ almuqaddimahyt
/ almuqaddimahyt
Music by epidemicsound.com
If you had a problem with the video, or found something to be incorrect, please send me a message, rather than being a jerk and reporting it.
I went on a trip to Mecca, Baghdad, and Mosul during the summer, and I learned so much about early Islamic history, and I got kinda hooked. It pains me to see Mosul today... cheers from Poland!
Baghdad, Damascus, Mosul, all these cities hold so much history, Islamic and Pre-Islamic. It truly breaks my heart to see what's happening there.
How did you get into Mecca? I thought the Holy City of Islam itself is closed off to all but Muslims?
Mussel was the Assyrian Capital 2000 years before Islam
Baghdad was the Persian capital until Islam came
Demarcus was the capital of Aramaic 1000 years before Islam
You can thank the shias and americans foe mosul's destruction
Polandball Historian how did you go to Mecca?
Crazy .How no one talks about khalid that much ..This guy is underrated...
Just watched your video on the useful charts channel and I'm now hooked!
Haha, glad to know that.
Same here.
I love that u r also from Pakistan. Im too and absoloutely love islamic and medeival history
How did you know he's from Pakistan? 😮
this channel needs to be promoted. there are a plethora of history channels on youtube dedicated to the distortion of our history. I always thought we need a history channel! I'm ready to help with research and funding.
Islam is terror. It is plunder loot, rape, killing and enslaving mostly women. Are you going to fund for that ...
@@joejim8931 ummm dude do you really think the world is going to be what you want back then mostly every nations and religions have a back story more violent then this but they dont tell that to the public. Islam is different and more socialized thats why you are seeing this video 💁
@@joejim8931 from your account I can see that your last liked video was a video called: "Dating over 50.... let's talk about Sex so your opinion does not matter!
@@Bruhganu-hj9qs well said
@@Bruhganu-hj9qs I'm happy, there is a lot of misinformation. Although, I'm a Christian, I want to know why Islam gained today's repitition (Because, Christians or Muslims we all pray to one mighty God, Jehovah or Allah. But, Christians believe since we are sinners we can't reach god ourselves but only through vindication of Messiah the Christ). Looking forward to learning more about Nabi(pbuh).
Hey, dude.
Lately, I've been binging some of these great history channels on TH-cam since I never got a chance to do a real deep dive of history in high school or college, and your stuff is among the top notch regarding this area!
History was always the subject that got neglected by me by other classes needed for career.
It's so fascinating and crucial to understand world history in order to fully appreciate the present.
I particularly appreciate the production value of your content. The segments are well-sized and the presentation is easy-to-follow with the graphics and narrative of the historical record.
I'm a fan of effort by content creators so I Patreon'd ya. Don't spoil yourself on that $1.50 a month. 😄
Peace and best of luck on the channel, friend. ☮️
Which other channels, specialized in other areas of history (or same, or general), would you recommend?
5:38
let me rephrase it more accurately, "You have done and you have done what no man has ever done before but it is not men who do it is Allah who does".
Yazdegerd was killed in Merv. It actually was his son who fled to china.
loser fasi majoosi still bitch about it
30 seconds in and I can already imagine the amount of paragraphs in caps lock in the comments this video will produce. I know it may be hard, guys, but just TRY to refrain from typing your mind numbing political and religious views and make the comments enjoyable? okay thanks
Exactly.
Hey, i just wanted to say that I've been following your channel for a while now and love the videos you put out. Very educational and informative as well! I do however would love some sort of list or links of sources as references so i could do some of my own research into the topic myself? I like to gather information and take notes on them quite often but i prefer doing it with articles or written media rather than video formats.
What a Great History we muslims have!
Mostly arabs
@@nizargonizar9826 Nope. Turks thrived under Islam during the ottoman caliphate days. The islamic golden age was mainly persian influenced. The golden age of cordoba had a lot of berber scholars. The Mughal empire was also great, and extremely influential in the indian sub continent.
@Musaaud Al-hawaly yes but everyone played a role in it, which is what made it so great.
@@nizargonizar9826
No, muslim history is for all muslims.
The christian arabs have no connection at all.
We are muslims first then Arabs.
@Musaaud Al-hawaly
Nationalism is cancer.
Just leave it.
Matthew 19:26 "All things are possible with God"❤️
These videos are sooo precise I've watched other videos too but they only showed the good side of Islam but here's a request that could you please compile all these videos into one big video and add more details and subtitles to it if possible???
This is fantastic. Well done!
I think it's more of a council because the idea of a parliament is that parliament only comes together to talk about rare and important decisions (in britain they just became really influential and permanent). The council is the (usually permanent) advisors of the king.
Also did I miss why he didn't want to destroy the byzantine empire? I thought it was just that it would be difficult to consolidate power in anatolia at the time.
Maybe. I just based it off the fact that in Pakistan, we call our parliament Majlis e Shur'a. It did act differently than a parliament.
There will be another video about the reason behind the expansion. He wanted Zagros Mountains and no further than that. That was his mission because these areas (Syria etc) had quite a bit of Arab influence. He didn't have any interest in destroying the Byzantines or even the Sassanids, just wanted a natural barrier that would protect Madina.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT interesting ok
@@jayasuryangoral-maanyan3901 arabs tribes in levant shared same culture . Some ecen made pilgrimages to mecca before islam.
Love the videos, I saw the first one last night and I am watching all of them. Excellent Stuff.
There are tons of beautiful stories from Umar ibn Khattab life as a caliph but I wanna mention one of them. Umar ibn al-Khattab declared in public: "Anyone who pays more for their dowry than what the Prophet [peace be upon him] used to pay, will put the excess amount in the Public Treasury.
A woman from the Quraish came to him and said: "O commander of the Believers, which have more right to be followed, the Book of Allah [the Qur'an]or your statement? He answered: "The Book of Allah."
So she told him, "You have just prohibited the people from giving the excess amount from the dowry, but Allah Taalah has revealed in His Book: "And if you have given them a great amount of gold as dower, take not the least bit of it back." [4:20]?
Therefore Umar said a few times: "The Woman is correct and Umar is mistaken."
A leader like this which is humble and is not complexed to state his mistakes is really one of a kind. The world and especially muslim world today would be in much a better state if there was a ruler like him.
Good video but please lower the volume for the music. I can barely hear you over it.
6:54 you are showing that the entirety of persia is conquered but the part of persia south of Caspian sea there was a small kingdom (that was not conquered) that protected their sassanian identity and land , they were attacked again by the ummayads but it would fail and finnaly it was the abbasid that managed to deafeat and take over that land ( This was crucial for trade with the steepe people and the Vikings).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_of_Persia#/media/File%3AMohammad_adil-Rashidun-empire-at-its-peak-close.PNG
I think that clan was called The House of Karen
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Karen
I actually do know about Daylam, as it's called but I thought they were conquered and then rebelled and conquered again so, I just decided to be a fool and generalized. I'll upload a correction in a future video.
Thank you for bringing it to my attention. :)
Wait isn't that house took kids from House of John
I wouldn’t use Wikipedia as a source
Meraklı Kanguru lol Now we Know Karens were invented in IRAN. that actually explains alot of things
This channel is so very good. Provided that there is no distortion of history occuring here. I am not aware of Arabic or Muslim history, so I would believe all of this to be true.
Having said that, it wouldn't hurt if the pace is little reduced and length of video is a bit more. But maybe the extra pace forces you to pay more attention than otherwise. Can't choose between the possibilities.
The only reason that the Islamic armies where able to defeat the Byzantine armies was because the Byzantines and the Sassanian empires had just ended a very long war with each other and both sides were exhausted militarily, also the peoples of Syria and North Africa, where different branches of the Christian faith, and they where regarded as second class citizens by the rulers in Constantinople, and so they where happy to let the Arabs rule over them.
@@domdauntless7704 The opponents of muslims were still vastly more in numbers. If you watch documentries on Khalid Ibn Walid, you'll see why muslims won. He crushed armies much bigger than his own with little equipment
Nice job! This Catholic approves!
Deus Vult, brother!
@@AlMuqaddimahYT wth???
@@AlMuqaddimahYT u meant Allahu Akbar right?
@@ssa3101 Catholic? Crusades?
@@Peristerygr Crusades were a disgusting part of history and he shouldn't have said it
Narrator of the video says that hey doesn't believe Ali to be the true successor as he doesn't believe in dynastic politics, I would like to point out several of known facts that shows that Imam Ali (PBUH) is the true and rightful successor of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
1. Imam Ali (SAW) is the only person in history to be born inside Kaba, a known fact. This makes him truly special. His birth itself is holy and no one in history has got the blessing of being born inside the most sacred place of Muslims
2. Imam Ali (SAW) is widely believed to be a brave person and his heroics is known in many battles that were fought while Prophet was alive. Nabi always depended on Imam Ali for various battles
3. It was Imam Ali (SAW) who bravely slept in Prophet's bed before Hijrat and didn't care about his life even after knowing that there was intelligence of an attack on Prophet's life which eventually happened - again a known historic fact.
4. Imam Ali's knowledge of worldy affairs and religious affairs was exemplary and even Abu Bakr, Umar, and Usman couldn't even compete with Ali in those affairs and would often refer complex disputes and judgement to Imam Ali - again a known fact
5. Prophet declared Ali as his successor in front of 70,000 people in Ghadeer-e-Khum. What else is needed.
6. After Prophet's death, it was only Ali who was busy in his funeral preparations while Abu Bakr and group were busy in Sakifah to decide successor. This fact alone proves who is right and who is wrong. Abu Bakr didn't even care about funeral and claimed to be a Caliph - what BS. How can such a person be a succesor of Prophet and an Islamic leader! Abu Bakr and group lacked basic human courtesy to mourn and care about funeral of founder of Islam. But they chose to do politics in Sakifah - Naozobillah!
Omar Ibn Al Khattab (Ra.). was a great person ...
Firoozan was great too to fuck him during morning prayer. 🖕👊
@@cykacookietardovic659 you dirty evil person
Also notice how he didn't pray at Jerusalem at the Christian temple, cuz he knows in the future, some ignoramus will claim it as muslim place of worship.
Dig into Omar series if you wanna learn more about his pre-Muslim days as well as till his death
@@TrueRaps He also came to Jerusalem without any royal guard like most King at the time, he came with his horse and his servant only, such a man...
Radiallahuanhu
Really love this channel
Great video I love Omar I was named after him and I beleive he is the best caliph in history and khalid bin waleed is the best General
FACTOS
Hey man! New subscriber here! Love the format for these videos. Early Islamic history is seriously unexplored territory for me so I appreciate the work you’re doing. What are the sources you’re using for these videos? Are they listed somewhere? I’d love to add some more books to my never-ending “to read” pile. Many thanks from Ireland!
Hey. Thank you for the kind words. Sure, I'll be adding the sources in the description of all my videos shortly.
www.kalamullah.com/index.html is my go-to site for islamic ebooks. Here is a pdf on the life of The Commander Khalid ibn Walid www.pdfdrive.com/khalid-bin-al-waleed-sword-of-allah-kalamullahcom-e11855832.html
Quite a intriguing and smart adress Abu Bakr gave 🖖🏾
ngl I felt pretty inspired by Abu Bakr's speech too
Why did you skip over most of the ridda wars , The battle of Yamana , Muhamad Bin Qasim and his invasion of Sindh and Musalmaya (The False Prophet) I would have loved to know more about these topics . Although I still loved the Video.Thank you
I did talk about Muhammad bin Qasim's invasion in the Umayyad Dynasty video. I'll talk about the other wars in future videos, give me some time, man! I'm only one dude! :D
Making longer videos is difficult for my computer to handle. So, I try not to cover too much in one video and just make a new video about something so, I've noted and I'll make a video about those wars in the future.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT thanks dude may god reward your hardship .
@@AlMuqaddimahYT we love history. Sorry, for our impatient.
You should've talked about the way a Caliph was chosen
Just wanted to point a few mistakes in this video:
1: abu bakr died after sending khalid into the Levant after saying his famous saying "I'll make the romans ignore the Whispers of Satan by khalid ibn al walid" it wasn't Omar who sent him infact Omar was appointed after khalid had captured demascus.
2: it wasn't Saad who took control in iraq after khalid it was Abu ubaid al thaqafi but after his death in the battle of the bridge Omar sent saad bin abi waqqas.
3: it should be noted that khalid was demoted from supreme command by Omar who gave it to abu ubaidah amir ibn al jarrah, but nevertheless abu ubaidah always gave khalid the command of the army while he was the governor.
4: Omar didn't say imprison my son till the next caliph decides, Omar was already dead when his son killed hormuzan and firuz and the brother of saad bin abi waqqas. Saad then told them to imprison Omar's son for killing his brother till the next caliph decides.
Nevertheless Your videos are really good and informative.
No. The time when Jerusalem was conquered Abu ubaida was already the army chief and Omar had already became the ameer. This is why when kaleed wanted to kill Thomas(son in law of haraclius) after conquering Jerusalem Abu ubaida didn't allow kaleed to do so.
2. Abu ubaida and others had let kaleed to command in the battle of yarmook but not other battles.
3. Omar after being wounded by feroz stayed alive for 2-3 days and at that time his enraged son obaidULLAH killed feroz's daughter and other relatives upon knowing this umar imprisoned his son and later the third caliph ussman gave blood money on behalf of obaidULLAH and he was freed from prison.
May ALLAH SWT grant us knowledge indeed all the knowledge we have is a blessing of ALLAH.
Ali gave his full support to the first Caliph once he received the news, he was 100% for it
What source do u hav to back this
Not immediately, like about 6 months later
Imam Ali (SAW) must have reluctantly given support as he didn't care about worldly politics and didn't want fights and unrest just after the death of Prophet had created a lot of uncertainty. However, the fact remains that Prophet (PBUH) very clearly declared Imam Ali (SAW) as his rightful successor in front of a crowd of 70,000 people in Ghadeer-e-Khum (A known historic event that Sunnis conveniently deny as it goes against their belief) with his words "Man Kunto Maula, fa haza Aliun Maula" meaning, "For those who I was the maula, Ali is now their Maula". It should be given proper thought why Prophet said only this for Ali and not for anyone else. Clearly, Imam Ali (SAW) is the righteous successor who was the only one busy in Prophet's funeral after his death while Abu Bakr and group lacking basic human courtesy were busy planning succession in Sakifah even before Prophet was buried - Naozobillah!
@@WiseGuy591 typical shia fabrication
Yes and the reason there was hurry in choosing caliph was due to the issue of some people in ansar wanting to have a caliph of themselves while Muhammad pbuh said it only belongs to quraish.
DAMN! episode 2and 3 are missing ,I'm rewatching these as i forgot.
hey - i am a bit confused by the thumbnails and episode numbers in video names - is this playlist complete or are we missing episode 3 ? (i guess it was just a mistake and 'birth of Islam' is really episode 3) anyway thank you so much for the wonderful content !!!
or maybe missing 786CE-833CE period ? sorry :) - super confused
I cannot stop watching your videos
His videos are misleading , he lost his credibility when he talked about the life of Prophet pbuh , because studied a lil bit about Prophet pbuh
Assalamualaikum brother, awesome contents! Exactly as you said, even I as a muslim do not know much about my religions history.
I see you did a lot of research and readings, can you please start adding a reference page at the end? It would be great for further readings and to increase your credibilit
There is no reference page because this is all lies.Islam is not a religion it's a warring political movement. It has no spiritual elements. It has spread through violence because Muhammad was violent.
your videos have a really good quality I subbed, keep up the good work! This christian approves!
Thank you! :)
Abo Bakr ordered Kalid bin Alwaleed to move to damascus. After the battle of Alyarmouk finished, the message that sais that Umar bin Al-khattab is now the caliph and he order that khalid shall abandon the leadership.
I alwaysss loved Hazrat Umar RA. Now I am loving him more
what does hazrat mean?
@@haitamc5611
كما نقول حضرتك.
@@haitamc5611 Hazrat means honored
Hazrat Umer (R.A) And Hazrat Khalid (R.A) is the Conquerors of Islam And other Sahaba
7:30 what a beautiful Chaliphate/empiere
Awesome work. Can you please make your videos longer? I’m looking for documentary style content. 40+ minutes 👍🏾
Noted!
Slm alkm. A very important documentary for Muslims to know where they come from and where they are currently. I hope you will also make some documentaries on Islam in SubSaharan Africa.
I am an American and far from God’s Love. Honesty is my star in an endless desert of fear and anger. I am old and God willing I will find peace.
May Allah Guide You
You know Calvin, in Islam it is possible to enter heaven. By strictly following the teachings of Jesus (peace be upon him) and not your church's teachings.
May allah guide u and give u peace and tranquility.
الغرض من الحياة
th-cam.com/video/Zor1et-rT8c/w-d-xo.html
5:30
I has found why umar ibn khattab dismiss Khalid ibn Walid
When Umar took charge of the caliphate, the Muslim armies were fighting against the Persians in Iraq and the Romans in Syria. The army in Syria was under the command of Khalid bin al-Walid, the favorite general of Abu Bakr. Umar's first act as khalifa was to dismiss him from all his commands, and to appoint Abu Obaida bin al-Jarrah as the supreme commander of the Muslim forces in Syria.
Shibli says that Umar had, for a long time, nursed a secret hatred of Khalid because of the latter's excesses. Umar had indeed dismissed Khalid because of his excesses but it appears that personal rancor was also at work. He was jealous of Khalid's fame and popularity. If he disliked Khalid's transgressions, he ought to have formally indicted him, and should have ordered full investigation of his crimes in murdering Malik ibn Nuweira and in appropriating his widow. If Khalid had been proven guilty, then Umar ought to have passed sentence on him according to the Islamic law. But there was no indictment and no investigation. Khalid was summarily dismissed and he died in poverty and obscurity in 21 A.H.
In which battle during the expansion did Ali won? he was mostly absent but always secretly coveting of the caliphate. quite shameless
@@MegaBaddog you talking about different topic here
great videos, keep it up
There is no problem with Abu Bakr succeeding Mohammad. The thing is, doing a meeting for the succession while Ali was busy preparing the funeral and the others were selfishly thinking about the power they will get, shows who was truly loyal to Mohammad and who was not.
There was a situation of political uncertainty after the death of prophet. Abu bakr did what he did to stabilise the situation. Besides, it is fitna of the highest order to question the loyalty of a man who was as close to the prophet as Abu bakr. He was the closest and the most trustworthy friend and companion prophet had.
I found your channel a few months ago but only started to really watch the videos now and they are really well made and informative I think it will really light up people curiosity to read more about the Arabic world, I already have to read a lot because I'm a history student but this videos already helped me get more curious in other subjects. The only bad part about this channel are some hypocrites in the comments, but i think that this is a problem with youtube in general...cheers from Brazil, brother.
Saying that The Sunni-Shia Split Starting when Abu Baker becomed a caliph is highly wrong, it actually started when A jewish guy called abullah ibn saba said that ali should be Muhammad successor just like how aaron was moses successor, and he was the one who made the false claims about uthman which you and the other secluer historians are saying such as him not being a capable caliph or that ali being superior to him just because he was a trader and not a military commander even though abu baker who was a much more successful caliph than ali was a trader and didn't have this much military history before becoming a caliph, eventually, Abdallah ibn Saba started gaining more followers which known today as Shias.
Also, let's not forget to mention that uthman married two of muhammed's daughters while ali married only one.
Note: Libya was conquered during uthman's rule not umar, and Tunisia wasnt fully conquered until Muawiyah's rule which was lead by the amazing general uqba ibn nafi.
@@IsraelLuisGeerRivera-ff4cg imo, Religions did nothing wrong. The peoples did
Israel And the blue coats Jews are great ... they wanted to worship idols right after God saved them from the Pharoah.
As a curiosity: Sunni and Shia view themselves as the same religion? There's differences in rite or prayers (just like between catholics, protestants and orthodox)?
Same religion, yes. Different interpretations. The more extreme people don't consider each other Muslims but you know, the reasonable ones don't mind.
I wish the Rashidun caliphate rule continued. Umayyads were a bunch of jerks.
Nah, I kinda like them. They were okay. I mean, sure, they were a bunch of spoiled racists but later, Umayyads in Spain were actually pretty decent.
True
@@AlMuqaddimahYT umayyads did kills zubayr who was aisha cousin, so you don't care about zubayrs
@Zakaria Ali yes
Even though I know most of the facts but you are an amazing story teller!
brother pleaase broadcast in Turkish too
Pretty interesting
After watching your videos on the Rashidun caliphate, I believe Umar ibn al-Khattab was my favorite caliph. A few years ago I would've been uncomfortable with Muslim expansion, but now I'm here wishing Umar took over the Byzantines and more! Having Khalid ibn al-Walid by your side is epic
Great stuff but it would be useful that you don’t erase the dates on the timeline !!! Would be easier to remember then and see the time intervals between the events !!! Can you do that ???
I am a Sunni and believe Ali was the legitimate successor of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as political leader but nobody was appointed as successor.
Yoda632 I agree ! The concept of successor and religious leaders as caliph are very disturbing.
Muhammed was chosen by God as a prophet .
They shouldn’t be any successor or at least religious/spiritual speaking . There is something deeply wrong about the behavior of those companions . Even how they rushed and almost self elected himself not waiting for Ali and the others companions is very suspicious. God forbid if I am wrong but it’s kind of a sneaky move !!
Satir1856 Dont you know Ali was busy preparing for the Prophets funeral and Burial when a bunch of so selfish people conspired and elected the successor despite the prophets announcing Ali ‘s position
Trash Video boi TRUE
@@mazharkhan4763 no you bigot. the prophrt did not appoint ali as his successor. and if the prophet had done so everyone would have accepted ali as caliph. and what do you mean by conspired? was the meeting arranged by abubakar and omar or with their consent.
Please can you say the prophet's name with respect(PBUH)
Can you just let the man speak. This is the first time I've found someone trying to present islamic history in a reasonable way. Don't force him with your views, non-muslims are also watching this.
Hey you can hear it from his tone he always respects the prophets.
We dont need to hear it Allah knows what is in his heart ☺️
Exactly non Muslims are also watching this stop enforcing your dogma on everyone.
You do realize that the moment he says "PBUH" any non-muslim viewer will suspect heavy bias in the video, when talking history ALL labels should be put to the side in the quest for objectivity and truth
Love your channel. Liked and subscribed.
like your videos, if you can speak more clearly and louder in the mic would be great some words are difficult to catch.
No doubt this man is blessed and would enter heaven.
Good video
Abu Bakr always held the opinion that he is Caliph of Muslim, not the Caliph of Prophet.
Khaled lost in Battle of Hunayn as well. Omer removed Khaled because he allegedly did some rubbish things during Riddah Wars
No he didn't idiot
Khalid wasn’t even in the battle of Hunayn and Khalid didn’t do anything rubbish in the Riddance Wars, And Abu Baker said that he is the caliph of the prophet and the Muslims.
@@Emir_969 khalidbinwaleed.blogspot.com/2010/12/cahpter-8-battle-of-hunain.html
Other sources include Tabari and Syutti on the top of my head.
Which also mentions khaled doin rubbish things in the Ridda Wars.
Now, what is source of yours where it says Khalid was not at Hunain?
Khalid Ibn Al Walid for me is among the Pantheons of Successful conquerors, comparable to Subutai, Marshal Davout, Hannibal, Scipio Africanus, etc.
Top notch!🔥
Beo y r u showing statue in the name of khalifa... This is not good hmmm.....
wow found this channel by accident. Watched 4 episodes in a row and absolutely loving it. Excited to learn the rest of the history.
I think this is a non Islamic channel.
@@sarifniamut1058 why is that?
@@sarifniamut1058 the person who runs this channel is a muslim though
I am just curious, why was there so much military effort to capture lands during this period. Why not stay in Mecca Madina and make it great. When buddhism spread from india to eastern asia, it was through monks who traveled and no military intevention/ invasion took place. Why were invasions done?
@M Sheikh now its god will that muslims in middle east should suffer. Seriously, hat off to your thinking
@M Sheikh then why perform hajj.
Killing of non muslims is also justified, i guess? Like killing of animals?
@M Sheikh whats a hindutvavadi?
Can you write in english? I dont understand arabic
That's what happened in South East Asia, Maldives, west africa.
Buddhism was consolidated by Kings and conquests, and not just monks. Buddhists monks from the time of Buddha himself had Kings as their benefactors.
Early Islamic touchings
very interesting pls i want us to communicate pls the owner of this channel need som guidance from you please
Plz make a video on Rashidun Caliphate and it's goverment system
Actually, When Prophet died. Chiefs of different tribes were sitting at the same place. A question aroused, which was very natural, "Who will be the next ruler/Caliph." And everybody start discussing and arguing, and things get heated up. Abu Bakar and Umar were informed of this situation. They went there and tried to calm things down. Fearing civil war, Abu Bakar asked them to choose either him or Umar for the seat of next Caliph. Umar, knowing the sensitivity of the situation, backdown in favour of Abu Bakar. And Abu Bakar was chosen to be next ruler. Ali was not present at the meeting. And tension lasted for few months. Pardon my English
Just bcz ur against dynastic rule doesn't snatch away the right of someone who is suitable to the post be it from same dynasty
True. Although, what makes you think Ali was suitable for the caliphate?
Wasn’t dynasty introduced by muawya? Who’s the biggest criminal? Just saying and btw responsible for the murder of the prophets grandson?So this elections done back then lead to total failure of rulership. It’s not proof enough that something was wrong ?
I recommend reading ‘then I was guided’ - an accurate look into history and will clear everything up based on Sunni and Shia sources to eliminate any controversy.
Hope this helps on your enlightenment journey!! :)
Link to book:
www.al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/12738
@@Tonymakaroni12 Well, Umayyad were criticised for dynastic rule. It's not like that Sunnis said they were doing right. Infact it were the Sunnis who rebeled against them, not Shias ( there were hardly any Twelver Shias those days Anyway).
Even we write the name as Prophet Muhammad s.a.w.
These s.a.w. are mandatory while writing so how can you not say "Peace be upon him" while orally mentioning
The music is too loud.
Who is Umar bil khatab?how he is succeeded Abu bakar?
He was one of Muhammad's closest allies and under Abu Bakr's rule, he served as an advisor and influenced many of his decisions.
Did you know .. prophet Muhammad s.a.w said .. if Umar ibn khatab walk on one road then Satan walk the same road with him .. the Satan will run away..he will not walk together with Umar r.a
And prophet Muhammad s.a.w said.. if Allah want to sent another prophet after me.. that man will be Umar r.a..
Thanks for the great video. Are you Muslim?
Yes.
Unfortunately you really misunderstood why shias think Ali should be the first go read hadeth AL gader which is a sunni hadeth not just shia
@Dark Lightning Its very complicated, sunnis say al nabi (as) meant "friend" with the word mawla, not leader.
The Hadith is short is:
Prophet Muhammad s.a.w raised ali (as) hand during his last pilgremage before death and said the following to the people:
Whoever i was his "mawla" ali is his "mawla"
Mawla has many meanings, for the most parts it means Leader, but it CAN also mean Friend.
The Sunnis think so because most Companions HATED Ali (as) but pretended to like him for the Prophet, there are many hadiths about it, and they say that it was necesarry to say for the Prophet s.a.w to declare ali (as) as a Friend.
Shias take it simple and say the Prophet s.a.w declared Ali (as) in Ghadeer as his sucsessor.
There are many Hadiths like Hadith al Kisa, Yawm al dar or "Ali to me is like Harun was to Musa", which clearly indicate that ali (as) has to be the sucessor, but Sunnis have an answer for all those tbh, its really just how you interpret it, me for myself i was sunni and i started believing in Imamah (Leadership), althrough i reject the 12 shia view
@Dark Lightning Abu Bakr was NOT appointed by the Muslims in general, read the event of saqifa, there were very few people, according to some sources just 6.
And Allah swt. tells us in the Quran to not obey sinners, so no it is NOT obligatory to follow a leader which is wrongdoing.
Imam Hussein (as) revolted against his Leader, so did Zayd ibn ali (as) and many more.
Its funny that even your sunni ulema such as imam schafi'i (ra) imam malik (ra) abu hanifa (ra), they all revolted WITH the Alids against the caliphs, imam Malik for example was brutally tortured.
The important part is that he admitted his own biases going in which is more than you'd get from any mainstream educator or college instructor on the subject.
@@Valatmir malik didn't revolt and there is no imamah as there is no need for it and use as or ra with abu Bakr.
lot of false information , In the battle of mutah , no party was won , but in comparison , Muslim were the winner
You call yourself a sunni muslim yet you don't respect the prophet. You call him simply 'Muhammad'? If you cannot say Muhammad (peace be upon him), then at least call him as 'Prophet Muhammad' not simply 'Muhammad'.
This attitude is not expected from a fellow muslim brother.
It's history channel, not religion channel
@@katarzynakabacinska7070
He used a religious term. As such the comment was for him. Do not argue when you have no idea what we are even talking about.
If you wish to keep yourself outside religion then do not use any terms that's exclusive to religion only. There is no shortage of English words.
Where are episode 2 and 3?
Yall know where I can find episodes 2 and 3?
Salaam,
really liked your videos, Can you please how you make these videos ?
Like what software's and process you go through ?
If possible can you please make a detail tutorial on it ?
Since i am learning designing and motion graphics, it would be really helpful for me.
I use Adobe After Effects. If you wanna learn it, there's free tutorials available right here on YT. Search for Mt. Mograph, School of Motion and the greatest one, Video CoPilot (All hail Andrew Kramer).
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Yea Andrew Kramer is AE God.
Yes i have seen them, was talking about your specific style, really liked it.
Thanks for the reply bro, keep up the good work :-)
OMG ! How tolerant was Omar r.a 😍😍😍
Brother bg music is so loud
Thanks this channel fulfill my needs
Keep the good work doing bro 👍🏻👍🏻
*Background music is awesome it gives me arabian vibes*
The reason for the rule of abu Baker is so controversial, it’s because they distracted Ali with mohammed’s death. knowing if he was at the private meeting he might have been a stronger contender for the caliph. For him it felt they don’t even care about his opinion as if he wasn’t important at all. Also , there were numerous proof in Muhammed speeches that suggested Ali should be his successor.
Fatima mohammed daughter was famously angry and furious about Ali not being the caliph.
the thing he said about umr was actually about Hazrat ALI alissalam
correction there was no private meeting
ansar and mahajiroon were gathered at saqifa bani saada and historic recrods clearly mentions that there was civil war about to break out
than abu bakar umar was at prophet funeral and messeage came to call him and then he went there and solved the problem which was almost resulting in civil war and eventually abu bakar was selected as caliph
amazing video dude, I just had one quick question what software do u use to make these videos?
Thanks. I use Adobe After Effects.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Thanks!
come on! saying "Sa'ad ibn Abi Vaqqas" multiple times like it's nothing and "Yazdgerd" is a mouthful? :))
Presentation: 7/10
Graphics: 10/10
Voice: 2/10
Love your videos but inflections are really off. They sound like a high school kid giving a presentation. And please get rid of the stupid iPhone from the rest of the beautiful art uhg
His voice is fine
His voice and style are so good❤
Why do say "Caliph" in such a weird way?? I was cringing the whole video..
Title is WRONG
It is EPISODE 2
NOT 4
I watched this show since his first episodes. He use to have them but maybe he accidentally put those videos on private. If you can get into touch with him then maybe he change it.
اسلام عليكم ورحمه الله، great video!🌼
1.When the messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم was ill during the last days of his life he appointed Abu bakr رضي الله عنه to lead the prayer as he couldn't do so in his illness.
2. After the messenger of Allah 's (صلى الله عليه وسلم ) death ,the ansar and mahajiroon had a meeting in the courtyard of banu saidah
3. Abu bakr, Umar and Abu ubaidah Al Jarrah( رضي الله عنهم( went there , after a debate Abu bakr told them to choose Umar or Abu abaidah Al Jarrah to be the caliph but they both pledged to Abu Bakr as there caliph
Just a point which I thought was worth mentioning🌸
This is total BS. Prophet(PBUH) said if there was any Prophet after me it was to be Ali. He also said for those who I am Maula. Ali is there Maula. In his last sermon.
Can't find episodes 2 and 3
th-cam.com/video/K58UVsQ4pw0/w-d-xo.html
I remade that into this one video. Sorry about the confusion.
After Laying waste to Sassanian armies during his campaign in 634, Khalid was sent to Syria-Palestine to combat Romans
During those times there was no Muslim armies in Mesopotamia which was reconqred by Persian for 2 years but later Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas decisively defeated Sassanians in november of 636 Ad muslim army had 30,000 troops while Persians had around 70,000 troops under Rostam Farukzad
Over 50% of Sassanian troops perished during battle along with Rostam and after that they posessed a threat to Muslims only in 642 when a Sassanian army under Piruz Khosraw numbering around 100,000 men marched against Muslim army again under Saad at Nahavand
But again Persian were outsmarted by Saad and outflanked by elite and devastating Mobile guards od Muslims and many drowned in river
They lost ove half of their men and the never ever possesed a major threat to Muslims
What'd I say?
@@AlMuqaddimahYT lol wtf why are you replying my every comment like this
I thought you were trying to correct me on something I said. If you wanna do that, join my discord.
Al Muqaddimah joined 👍🏽
@@AlMuqaddimahYT bro your replies are the Most weirdest.
3:49 his army was defeated in Mutah but he wasnt a commander but after many of previous commander died he took command and managed to save his army against all odds
What'd I say?
Dude that's what he said !! 😂
@@abdulazizbature2615 lol I must be high when I wrote this lmao
@@umaransari9765 probably !
This is not historical. Must read argumentation by historian or orientalist like angelika neuwirth, juynball, etc
Just a note. You said Christianity was "canonised" 300 years laters. The present day canon of the New Testament took some time to be forged, but the earlies gospel, Mark's, is of around year 70 and the earliest of Paul's letter is of around year 50. Considering that Jesus died around 30, forty years is not very long. Whoever wrote the gospel of Mark probably knew some of the apostles personaly or some disciple of them.