Did Massive Lakes Form the Grand Canyon?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 137

  • @TheUglyAmerican007
    @TheUglyAmerican007 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I was just in Moab and noticed how the rocks that have broken off the sheer cliffs would land directly below on a still steep decline. They should have kept tumbling below to the ravines and not stopped, unless there was some resistance like water.

  • @ralvis22
    @ralvis22 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Excellent Excellent Excellent. I love the views from the air. Solid explanations. I really like the animation showing how it might have happened. Keep up the great work!

  • @ApexLight7
    @ApexLight7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The idea of the Grand Canyon being formed by a massive lakes failing is incredible. What would that have looked liked if one was to witness it. If their were people living in the area they could have seen it happen.

    • @jeancuivre
      @jeancuivre 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Migration oh the humans after the flood probably followed this path : Mesopotamia -> India -> China + South East Asia -> North America through Russia-Alaska -> South America. Remember that oceans were less deep precisely because lots of water was still trapped in the form of giant lakes on the continents. I'd say that erosion of Grand Canyon occured before humans arrived. But who knows in the end ;)

    • @Video81501
      @Video81501 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I wouldn't use the word incredible, it seems perfectly credible.

    • @jeremy472
      @jeremy472 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      unlikely that many were settled in north america at the time

    • @spikenomoon
      @spikenomoon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most people in N America were in the south east Florida Georgia and Louisiana.

    • @stevemiller1517
      @stevemiller1517 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      During the height of the flow a continuous earth quake?

  • @krbohn101
    @krbohn101 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I love REAL science like this!
    Thank you for this.

  • @justplayguitars9143
    @justplayguitars9143 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I have been keenly watching your channel for a week now, and I never knew that Christian people did not believe that the Earth was so old. I find this absolutely incredible. I'm studying the Bible and researching more and more due to being so intrigued. My intrigue was heightened when I then learnt of the amazing work and discoveries of Ron W. That lead me to the most incredible, if not miraculous, research of the real Mount Siani in Saudi Arabia. Once I saw the Rock of Mosses, I was almost hypnotised by it all. It has lead me now to a very interesting thought.. God lays out the path for his chosen ones. We have his story listed and now proven to be true in the past ( Ron W. Discoveries definitely prove many Bible accounts to be true, in my opinion ) however, we also have God's accounts of the future, which raises an understanding that I do not hear much talking about. There are no sections to God's plan. The chapters he prepares for us all are not parts of a plan. IE, seperate parts being played out. They are a reflection of his whole story. One that fundamentally begins from the end. In other words, his judgment on man has been made by the future being already written by him. There was no time that he became disappointed by man's sins and gave us another chance. There is no another chance because his final chance has already been written for us all and he believes we must have an end of times. You see, if we start from the end we realise his faith in human kind was never there. If it had been our vision of the future would be of human expansion and extension. But it is not. The whole of God's story is based on his final judgment of our race. Not his acceptance that we fulfilled his wishes for us. Ultimately, to give my final opinion, we have failed him as a race. Even though many humans are beautiful, the real truth is the bad, wicked and cruel have let us all down.
    I state my opinion with all the respect I can ever give. If I've made a mistake or misunderstood God's teachings in the Bible, please forgive me. And explain my faults to me. I just thought I had stumbled across a very significant and prominent point to the Bible. Thus, we should start from the end and understand the real significance to God's final judgment that HAS already been written for us. God bless you all 🙏

    • @edisontrent618
      @edisontrent618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The only thing I would add, is that though we failed, as God knew we would, God still loved/loves/will love us despite our failures. And because of that love, those that are brought to faith by the Holy Spirit are saved from our own failures, every time. Not as a "second chance", in that we get to try again and maybe get it right this one time or else, but in that the consequences for failure are erased, expunged entirely. We have the opportunity to try and try and try, not just with what we can do on our own, but with God's help as well.

    • @lorrainewhitehead9080
      @lorrainewhitehead9080 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You are right God knew we would fail but He gave us a second chance and that is Jesus. By having faith in Jesus we are made acceptable to God. We are hopeless, God in His infinite goodness provides the solution. He so loved the world He gave His only begotten Son. It’s not about Him having faith in us, it’s about us having faith and trusting in Him. When you say the future is written by God that is not right, He does not manipulate us, we are not His puppets, He gives us free will. He is all knowing and He knows what the future will be and He reveals this to us in the Bible so we will be prepared and ready for when Christ comes again. As a new born again Christian a few years ago, it blew my mind when I read the Bible for the first time and realised the universe is only a few thousand years old. Most people will scoff at this but I believe in the God who made everything. You are a very intelligent person, you need to humble yourself and come like a child and accept Jesus and the Holy Spirit will show you the truth.

    • @kurtkensson2059
      @kurtkensson2059 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's true, He declared the end, from the beginning. Still, though, maybe He _was_ surprised by Abram's faith, and, because he would have willingly sacrificed his son Isaac, The Father decided that the human race (a remnant of it, anyway) was worth saving, and deserving of His mercy. The Son, being the good leader that He is, knew that you can't expect your followers to do more than you're willing to do yourself, so He willingly sacrificed Himself on our behalf to obtain that mercy for us.

    • @Michael-um5pd
      @Michael-um5pd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My grandfather talked to me about all of this and not to believe in man, because man's heart is continually evil, greed and jealousy will destroy you. You cannot make it on your own, you need Jesus as an everyday guide and if you are born again with the holy spirit, repent for your sins, and once he leads you out never go back, believe me you will sin again, but through faith and repentance and truly doing God's work be as close to the father as you can. We all stumble that is fact but never give up.

    • @Solargeek
      @Solargeek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Research "The Katabole: The overthrow of the 1st earth age. Im not necessarily endorsing any particular teaching on the subject, but you may have recognized that this is not the first time that the world ended. The word earth in the greek manuscripts of the new testament often refers to aeon, or age. Just food for thought.

  • @Steblu74
    @Steblu74 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Any 10 year old boy who has dammed a ditch on a rainy day and watched the water carve its way as it escapes can see identical formations worldwide. Once you see it you can't unsee it...

  • @AlexanderosD
    @AlexanderosD ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No imagery will ever do it justice, you've gotta see it with your own eyes, truly awe-striking.

  • @endofdaysprophet
    @endofdaysprophet 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Recently I have been looking at the Grand Canyon on maps and was wondering about the "fingers" and the lakes filling the "fingers" then draining makes sense to me. THANK YOU!!! Also first time I heard anyone say this is AFTER the rocks had hardened.

  • @AintNoFool
    @AintNoFool 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is a much more believable "theory" than what we were taught about millions of years of erosion. The Missoula Floods sure testify to the power, impact, ability of water to move boulders, move sediment, hundreds of miles. The explosion of Mt St Helens and subsequent events also supports these ideas. Thank you for these videos.
    I am fortunate to live where I can see Mt Rainier and Mt St Helens daily. Remarkable. ❤

  • @Dom.0
    @Dom.0 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wonder how much in the grand canyon hasn't been discovered yet, honestly, this stuff is awesome.

    • @kenknowlton3085
      @kenknowlton3085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Imagine a cave hidden anywhere in that massive, extensive geological formation and the challenge to ever find such a needle in the haystack.

    • @TFOTLITBOK_P1_7
      @TFOTLITBOK_P1_7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah. Funny how we don't know the extent of that while traveling to "outer space" huh. Might have something to do with the federal government keeping about 90% of Grand canyon off limits to the public. They actually have armed federal agents guarding Kincaid's cave where the skeletal remains of giants as well as Egyptian artifacts had been recovered in the past. Egypt actually demanded any made of gold be returned.
      Similar to how we are restricted access to Antarctica. Multiple nations in as treaty that can't seem to agree on anything except that we should stay away from there.
      Problem is we have been so overwhelmingly indoctrinated and conditioned to believe lies that almost nobody can accept the truth anymore. I suspect that it's gone on so long that even those who teach aren't even aware of false teachings. If you want to know what a little of that is, read Ezekiel chapter 31 and Daniel chapter 4 then take a closer look at places like the Grand canyon and the black hills in SD. The remains of what's mentioned there are found all over the earth. Just check out the names of places in and surrounding the Grand canyon is a clue to its significance. Places like Zion, alter of sacrifice, Angels landing, the West Temple, the East Temple, edge of the cedars, just to name a few.
      It will all be revealed one day and their efforts to hide that God created the earth and everything in it and his ownership of it will have all been for nothing.

  • @geenogee
    @geenogee ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Since mountains were uplifted after the Flood, it seems likely the Colorado Plateau was also uplifted sometime after the Flood. Creationists need to consider if metamorphism happened during explosive uplift after the Flood. The heat from metamorphism would evaporate all sources of water and cause torrential rainfall. This likely formed temporary lakes and cause flooding in all directions such as the side canyons. The relatively sharp turns and bends in the Grand Canyon suggest the Grand Canyon was easily eroded because the geological features were still hot and torrential rainfall caused ongoing flooding.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you compress 200 million years of uplift and mountain building into one year, the heat created would melt the earth’s crust and sterilize the planet.

  • @davidstevens5908
    @davidstevens5908 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I would like to see some work done about where all that massive amount of rock debris ended up. I believe much of it ended up near the Salten sea.

    • @beestoe993
      @beestoe993 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes, it either became part of that massive delta from the Salton sea to the Sonoran desert or is on the ocean floor where it flowed to in the form of very muddy water. Then settled on the bottom as silt.

    • @stevemiller1517
      @stevemiller1517 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The deposits filled the northpart of gulf of california,perhaps thousand ft deep,400 Sq mi.

    • @stevemiller1517
      @stevemiller1517 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The land above sea levelbetween Salton sea and gulf of Cali. Is the alluvial deposit.

  • @bobplyley-hj8eb
    @bobplyley-hj8eb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    There are also ancient lake Missoula and Bonneville that caused fast and massive erosion.

    • @beestoe993
      @beestoe993 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly right. Bonneville spilled over, caused massive flooding in Idaho and formed the snake river canyon. There is not even a debate about that. But I don't think that was hundreds of years after the flood, more like just a few years, because Lake Bonneville was massive and still rising when it breached.

    • @spikenomoon
      @spikenomoon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same thing for Washington. Lake masula. I think that’s the name

  • @cliveblacksheep2522
    @cliveblacksheep2522 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Praise Jesus
    Praise the most High God

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks for sharing ☺️🙏🙏🙏 God bless you

  • @Kahless_the_Unforgettable
    @Kahless_the_Unforgettable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    It's baffling. Geologists know that this can happen. They admit that it happened in the same basic area. The Lake Bonneville flood caused a similar, but smaller canyon.
    I'm glad that science is finally catching up with reality.

    • @richardelliott8352
      @richardelliott8352 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      salt flats are not a giant canon. if the formation events were comparable, so would be the results. use your head

    • @Kahless_the_Unforgettable
      @Kahless_the_Unforgettable 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardelliott8352 I know you think you said something. I'm sure you think it was brilliant. But you're simply ignoring evidence because you don't like where that evidence leads. You refuse to use your head because if you did, you'd be forced to admit God exists.
      I understand.

  • @opendstudio7141
    @opendstudio7141 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This strata causes you to wonder on how violent the opening of the fountains of the deep were. From the fossil record, we can see the dragons we’re surprised, overwhelmed and buried in clay.

    • @jean-jacqueslavigne3109
      @jean-jacqueslavigne3109 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like your use of the word “dragon”. How course, it is a double edge sword as it adds to the “mythological” interpretation of the bible’s flood etc …but I understand why you chose that word over “dinosaur”…

    • @opendstudio7141
      @opendstudio7141 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Bible is the most reliable historical record we have. Holy Spirit of the Lord had those terms written that way intentionally. During that period, genomics had compromised everything. The Bible declares it will happen again.
      You already know, Scientists for decades worked feverishly to perfect gene splicing and sequencing; hoping to creat perfection using quantum computing.

  • @gusward2568
    @gusward2568 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That little tiny River did not dig no Canyon! If it did that River had to be miles wide and moving through soft terrain!

  • @onefeather2
    @onefeather2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great information, and so true.

  • @andys208
    @andys208 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wonderful, it is nice and easy to see when you follow the facts of what we observe! Thank you

  • @jimhughes1070
    @jimhughes1070 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glad I found this short video again 👍

  • @SaleItem-hc3dm
    @SaleItem-hc3dm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been following these guys for probably over 20 years, gone down to Arizona to a conference with Del Tacket and following the documentaries and studies these groups have created, have some of the videos they created… I have been to the Grand canyon and marvelled at it’s monstrosity… Common sense has told me a small river like the Colorado river as seen today could never have eroded the Canyon as it is today, no matter how many millions of years… Some other event caused it, a rapid event… This video comments on that… I would add to the conversation they haven’t brought up here… What caused the massive lakes that breached and eroded the canyon in the first place… I believe the massive lake were formed during the melt off to the north of the massive glaciers that once covered a big portion of the northern hemisphere, as it once covered 2 km thick ice in Manning Park, it all melted flowing south, initially creating massive lakes that then breached and caused the canyons… That’s my story and I’m sticking to it…

    • @stevemiller1517
      @stevemiller1517 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yous story is very factual, good thinking!!

  • @bigdbassn4489
    @bigdbassn4489 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where do we believe the material went that was eroded? Thank you for putting this together!

    • @jean-jacqueslavigne3109
      @jean-jacqueslavigne3109 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Follow the flow of water… at the end, there lay huge sand deposits and oil & gas deposits from all the biomass that was ripped off, carried and then buried with it…

    • @beestoe993
      @beestoe993 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Look at google earth and follow the river. It forms a massive Delta at the gulf of California. All the way from the Salton Sea to the ocean.

  • @vivianasoto424
    @vivianasoto424 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! Absolutely breathtaking.

  • @beestoe993
    @beestoe993 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The post flood era would have began with what we understand as the so-called Ice age. After the flood most of the water would have drained back to the sea fairly rapidly after "the fountains of the great deep" ceased their bursting. But as stated in the video, massive lakes were formed in the aftermath. Now think about the Ice that was left behind in the higher elevations. There have been maps and estimates of the extent of the ice cap for years and they are known to be relatively accurate, its extent and mass was considerable. After the global storm subsided, all it would have taken is for the first summertime to once again arrive, and the runoff from the Ice cap would have been absolutely enormous. THAT is what I believe caused the lake to breach. Warm temperatures returning to the frozen high country. It would not have taken hundreds of years. Just one summer.

    • @stevemiller1517
      @stevemiller1517 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first summer ,really awesome, then each year until the lake was empty

  • @enmerdeur
    @enmerdeur 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As you mentioned even traditional geologists agree that there is no way the Grand Canyon was carved out by the Colorado River alone. They apparently have found evidence to basalt daming from volcanic activity occurring upstream forming lakes, then the relatively fragile basalt dam would breach causing massive flooding. This would repeat over and over. Have you found any similar evidence of this?

  • @mmaimmortals
    @mmaimmortals ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's an interesting idea on the surface, but the fractile branching pattern all around the main body of the canyon tells a very different story than breached lake dam. It looks very distinctly like sheet flow recession much like coastal areas where tides cover the coast and sheet off back toward the ocean.
    The breached dam scaled demo was interesting indeed, but the result didn't look anything like the Grand Canyon because the fractile branching was no where to be seen.

  • @tonyputman3398
    @tonyputman3398 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent!! Thanks!! Where is the material that was eroded during these events? Shouldn't there be some evidence of it in the Gulf of California. Please discuss this.

    • @HomeInspectorCoreyLambrecht
      @HomeInspectorCoreyLambrecht ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have the same question. Where did it all go?

    • @edisontrent618
      @edisontrent618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HomeInspectorCoreyLambrecht Another comment mentioned that the Salton Sea area would be worth looking into, specifically.

    • @nunyabizniss6934
      @nunyabizniss6934 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      There is a stretch of sand dunes all along the mountains southeast of the Salton Sea. There is also a huge sand sea southeast of Yuma just over the Mexican border. It was suggested by Dr Walt Brown, who originally came up with the lake theory, that isotope testing could confirm if the sand came from the Grand Canyon.

    • @tonyputman3398
      @tonyputman3398 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nunyabizniss6934 Thanks!! It's quite interesting!

  • @gorkon1971
    @gorkon1971 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why no mention of Walt Brown?

  • @josephreigens3090
    @josephreigens3090 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you!!!

  • @lainy7740
    @lainy7740 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Yes it is history

  • @darylefleming1191
    @darylefleming1191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A good explanation of this is in Walt Brown's book, "In The Beginning". I recommend it to everyone.

  • @ErikPehrsson
    @ErikPehrsson ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! That’s is amazing to think about!

  • @GrantDexter
    @GrantDexter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Grand Lake was the trigger. Hopi Lake was smaller and failed once Grand Lake topped the barrier at Marble Canyon. The notion of other lakes forming once the failure began is detrimental to understanding the process.

  • @futtermanfarms6791
    @futtermanfarms6791 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    makes really good sense.

  • @srice6231
    @srice6231 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So fascinating!

  • @mondochild
    @mondochild 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Take a hike in page AZ. Just west of the hotels. You can see evidence of catastrophic megafloods in solid rocks. I Imagine a scary dark colored rushing swirling water miles across to other side of the canyon. While cutting downward Not at once, but multiple times when an ice dam broke every so often. Blende with past Hopi lake. Formed Grand Canyon . A lot of seashells on dry deserts land.

  • @nunyabizniss6934
    @nunyabizniss6934 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds a lot like the model proposed by Dr Walt Brown. I wonder if they will give him credit for it?

    • @Believer21777
      @Believer21777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes It does.

    • @schleichface
      @schleichface 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was combing through the comments here to see if anyone else caught that.

  • @yoblob34
    @yoblob34 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if it happened as you say on this video would you be able to find the soil that came from this erosion somewhere down stream

  • @michaelmahoney9079
    @michaelmahoney9079 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could it be that during the end of the ice age there was a melt water lake above the grand canyon that

  • @bruceweirich3733
    @bruceweirich3733 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes

  • @bobcrossley917
    @bobcrossley917 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree, it happen fast.

  • @chrisemmert1387
    @chrisemmert1387 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    More likely would be a (GLACIER) lake failure.
    a similar event occurred in Iceland several years ago.
    Subglacial lake (internal).
    Lee's fairy is evidence of a massive flow.

  • @SaleItem-hc3dm
    @SaleItem-hc3dm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's likely massive amounts of water would have come from the receding and melting glaciers filling the lakes until the burst at the seems... All the glacial melt had to go somewhere, makes total sense to the common logical thinker... It's impossible a meandering river carved out the width and depth of the massive grand canyon... just imagine, glaciers 2km deep melting, that's a lot of water that needs to get to the sea billy...

  • @brianpottorff9779
    @brianpottorff9779 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is silly stuff. Bending over backwards to explain something away. Ever heard of Occam’s Razor?

  • @WORDversesWORLD
    @WORDversesWORLD 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Grand Canyon could just as easily have been a giant fissure that opened up, a source of water!

    • @GreatBehoover
      @GreatBehoover 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You have to give evidence of WHY you believe this not just make wild guesses that the reason for the fissure can't be demonstrated. If there was a fault line or pressures than so be it. Bit tell us WHY you assert this?

    • @WORDversesWORLD
      @WORDversesWORLD 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GreatBehoover Have you not seen how the massive crack that formed in Africa split wide open all of a sudden? It still continues to grow and science now believes it could divide Africa in two. And no this 35 mile long, 60 feet deep crack isn't the grand cannon, but it did prove that things can happen fast and without water.

    • @GreatBehoover
      @GreatBehoover 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@WORDversesWORLD
      There is NO REASON to believe This would or could or did happen. Not only that, WATER flood events leave EXACTLY this kind of evidence. His models show this. The crack in Africa is a FAULT LINE. The grand canyon is NOT. THINK!

  • @phillipbox7957
    @phillipbox7957 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s really no evidence for a lake but substantial evidence for extremely rapid erosion. This could be similar to the scab lands glacial flood system.

  • @wandawiebe1581
    @wandawiebe1581 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was just doing a study of Job 38:25-26 and rewrote it as
    "Who hath split for the rainflood a channel
    and a way for the lightning-voices
    sending rain upon the earth without man,
    the wilderness without mankind therein?"
    As I was thinking about what it meant, I recalled this video, as well as the experience of dealing with a number of floods caused either by spring rain/melts or stalled summer rainstorms, and even having a nearby gravel road needing to be moved over because a small creek eroded its banks. I was thinking how the Grand Canyon channel (and other similar ones) was split in an uninhabited post-flood wilderness - perhaps the precipitating event that caused the spill-overs was spring/summer rainstorms. And could God in his mercy have such events around the world happen in areas before they became inhabited by humans? Could God have had such events in mind when He spoke these words to Job?
    Thanks for your endeavours that are both biblically and scientifically sound, that helps us understand both better.

  • @umvhu
    @umvhu ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The apostle Paul never had this technology to spread God's Word, yet he achieved so much.

  • @bushna2007
    @bushna2007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where did all that water go?

  • @ken_U_seet
    @ken_U_seet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Electric Universe Theory..

  • @kevinhill5341
    @kevinhill5341 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this not what Dr Walt Brown revealed in his hydroplate theory?

  • @Believer21777
    @Believer21777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was told a theory that yellow stone mega eruption was the catalyst and an earth quack caused a breach in the mountains enough for the rapid erosion . Some of The rocks are found clear into the ?Willamette valley Oregon as to why the Valley is fertile. No I wish had something But I have nothing to back that up . I watched IT on T.V before the internet years ago.

  • @TheSharperSword
    @TheSharperSword 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    " Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways shall be made smooth." (Luke 3:5). "The mountains quake at him, and the hills melt, and the earth is burned at his presence, yea, the world, and all that dwell therein. Who can stand before his indignation? And who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, and the rocks are thrown down by him." (Nahum 1:5-6).

  • @Turner.1
    @Turner.1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It formed when the Yucatan asteroid hit,caused fracturing .what else you want to know?

  • @matthewchapman2248
    @matthewchapman2248 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So have you seen this shrine made up by some old person that is now deceased. Its essentially water dripping onto a rock. Theres a few of them. 10 years old, 50 years old and 100 years old.
    The rocks are eroded evenly, with the oldest being more eroded.
    Water can erode rock, over a long time. Conversely, water can erode loose sediments very fast in a short time.

  • @phillipgray7371
    @phillipgray7371 ปีที่แล้ว

    The ice melt after the flood provided all the water.

  • @conradnelson5283
    @conradnelson5283 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So where is the downstream evidence. Ripples, dunes, holes filled with boulders like snake river?

  • @NoTrashInHeaven
    @NoTrashInHeaven ปีที่แล้ว

    I haven't been there yet, but would love to see it by air!

  • @Jay-ho6gw
    @Jay-ho6gw 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's common sense when the astriod hit where the gulf of Mexico is that is what caused the grand canyon to form from the earthquake s that's breached the natural dam

  • @pataho7375
    @pataho7375 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fallen angels tried to hide under rock to protect themselves from god’s fury. No amount of earth or rock can stop god from judging you.

  • @jonveitch7662
    @jonveitch7662 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It was formed by a charged body passing close to Earth, causing a sputtering discharge connection. The strata isn't formed through deposition but through the transmutation of the elements. Calcium carbonate is only a few protons from water. A surplus of protons are found at lightning strikes.
    These frequency bands are formed in highly energized Birkeland currents.

  • @juanjesusgonzalezgil4830
    @juanjesusgonzalezgil4830 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y si es antigua mineria antediluviana de los ángeles caídos y los nefilin?
    Gloria a Dios y Señor Jesucristo

  • @tommyhunter1817
    @tommyhunter1817 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No. Runoff from the Flood carved it.

  • @Zomfoo
    @Zomfoo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are high resolution satellite images more useful than a copter ride.

    • @marschlosser4540
      @marschlosser4540 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And not as fun.

    • @roblangsdorf8758
      @roblangsdorf8758 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hard to talk to an audience as the satellite flies over. This really provides a much better illustration.

  • @normhannawell3029
    @normhannawell3029 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🙂

  • @michaelarmbruster586
    @michaelarmbruster586 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about the area the government has blocked off

  • @ThePipemiker
    @ThePipemiker 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Applesauce!

  • @WORDversesWORLD
    @WORDversesWORLD 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We don't know, it could have just as easily formed on its own!

  • @RyanPhillips-y2w
    @RyanPhillips-y2w 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Great Flood in Noah's Days.GOD flooded the whole world.Proven it was created in one major avent.

    • @RyanPhillips-y2w
      @RyanPhillips-y2w 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's been proven it was created in one major flood.

  • @blackdot3538
    @blackdot3538 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I carved the Grand Canyon. It wasn't easy, believe me. I want credit for it.

  • @TearDownThisWall
    @TearDownThisWall 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Millions & billions of years.😂😂😂

  • @nml5536
    @nml5536 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If it was a natural dam break it wouldn't snake back on itself the way it does, thats seems to typically form over longer periods of time.

  • @nibiruresearch
    @nibiruresearch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When we look at the Grand Canyon we see many horizontal layers on top of each other but close-ups of these layers also show that they are completely separated from each other and the layers look rather homogeneous. How is this possible? Each layer is the effect of a recurring natural disaster, a huge tidal wave that is pulled over the planet, that is caused by a celestial body that circles our sun in an eccentric orbit. A thick layer of homogeneous mud remains on our planet. Fantasy? No, ancient knowledge that is available in books, legends, myths and religions. The many earth layers are solid proof for this recurring disaster. No scientist will agree to this because they all are focused on their small part of science. They know a lot about a little. Those natural disasters occur in a cycle of seven and create a cycle of five civilizations. The longest living civilization lives no more than 10,800 years. Nonsense? No, ancient knowledge and that knowledge is supported by many depictions that we find in museums on statues, cylinder seals, coins etc. The last time that this celestial body, planet X or nine, was seen and depicted and commented was just before our era. To learn much more about planet 9, the recurring flood cycle and its timeline, the rebirth of civilizations and ancient high technology, read the e-book: "Planet 9 = Nibiru". This book answers many of your questions about ancient history. It can be read on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: planet 9 roest

  • @davidgardner863
    @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to lay down the layers before you can erode the canyon. Those layers, nearly a mile deep are different types of rock representing different climatic conditions over time and contain different types of fossils in the different layers with the more primitive ones at the bottom and progressively more advanced as you go up.

    • @edisontrent618
      @edisontrent618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And what about the densities of those fossils? Which ones would float vs sink in a sediment filled aquatic setting?

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edisontrent618 , The fossils are not buried in a particular layer depending on whether or not they float.

    • @edisontrent618
      @edisontrent618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidgardner863 Do you know about the different classifications of river sediment? Material density doesn't mean simply "float" or "not float".

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edisontrent618 , Isn’t that what you said? Don’t make me try to guess your point.

    • @edisontrent618
      @edisontrent618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidgardner863 You made a false assumption, due to lack of knowledge on sedimentary and particulate dynamics, that the only possible way for sediment layers and fossil layers to be arranged is through long periods of time. I asked if you had that knowledge, because your statement "fossils are not buried in a particular layer depending on whether or not they float" is demonstrably false by any person with a glass of water and a handful of dirt, sand and different density objects.

  • @peter04345
    @peter04345 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    'Millions of years is becoming unpopular among geologist ' now that is a lie. It is not unpopular it is accepted knowledge. It might be unpopular among creationist geologist, but these geologist have a special text book. Do not lie to the people.

    • @roblangsdorf8758
      @roblangsdorf8758 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is something you need to tell to the old age geologists.

  • @jackwt7340
    @jackwt7340 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the beginning, the earth was an egg, so you can say the earth was a water ball. 🥚
    At first, the sun's light was so weak that it only illuminated Mercury.🌚
    After the sun's nova jump, sunlight began to provide energy to the Earth.🌞
    Since then, the earth gradually changed from an egg to a turtle.🐢

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Says the world renowned cosmologist/astronomer.

  • @DaveSchultz-h5u
    @DaveSchultz-h5u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I believe it was something else.the sun, with a plasma hit.just like on Mars,

  • @davidgardner863
    @davidgardner863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So how many geologists are changing their way of thinking of how the Grand Canyon was eroded? Who conducted the survey? What were the results? Sounds like a baseless claim to me.