J-20: Comparing China's secretive fighter jet to the F-22 & F-35

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • China's secretive J-20 'Mighty Dragon' fighter jet has gone on public display on the ground for the first time.
    Entering service in 2017, the J-20 is China's answer to the US F-22 Raptor and one of the world's few fifth-generation warplanes.
    We've compared the Chinese fighter jet to the F-22 and F-35 aircraft.
    #j20 #f22 #f35 #forcesnews #china
    More: www.forces.net...
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: forces.net
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Twitter: / forcesnews

ความคิดเห็น • 1.7K

  • @adamc2378
    @adamc2378 ปีที่แล้ว +393

    All 3 jets have different roles within the doctrine of their respective militaries. This is like comparing apples to oranges to bananas because they are all fruits.

    • @addygreen8919
      @addygreen8919 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I prefer apples.

    • @kingdomofprussia9749
      @kingdomofprussia9749 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I prefer all

    • @farrukhahmad555
      @farrukhahmad555 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I Want Do Asset Manager, Asset Take Care, Accounts And Tax Manager I Do Work for you safe And Honestly

    • @djuanstanziola9882
      @djuanstanziola9882 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 day I got into an Orange fight with other kids, I prefer bananas 😂

    • @farrukhahmad555
      @farrukhahmad555 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@djuanstanziola9882 I do work for you with safely

  • @muzikizfun
    @muzikizfun ปีที่แล้ว +224

    The only thing that matters is what happens in combat. While reputation might deter or make an enemy hesitate, only combat can settle the issue.

    • @kopite8971
      @kopite8971 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly the battle of Britain, proof....

    • @jimmygeeraets9039
      @jimmygeeraets9039 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kopite8971 the spitfire was a master piece. I dont think its the same.

    • @kopite8971
      @kopite8971 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jimmygeeraets9039 in terms of more powerful aircraft and completely out numbered. I'd say so in terms of power doesn't always win. If you get my point

    • @kopite8971
      @kopite8971 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimmygeeraets9039 the spitfire was easier to manoeuvre and more agile but the German planes were probably the most powerful from that era, I'd just say we had better pilots and tactics.

    • @jimmygeeraets9039
      @jimmygeeraets9039 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kopite8971You've got that right. the battle of britain was also won on several factors. good British secret service. aircraft crashing, the pilots who survived could be picked up from the English and returned to work. and a very good plane and more experienced pilots over longer periods of time. the Germans had a very poor intelligent network, they received a lot of misinformation and pilots lost them when they crashed in England and the surrounding area. . I also think that the BF 109 Messersmith was a less aircraft than the Spitfire more competitive with the Hawker Huracine. and the choice to move from military targets to civilian targets is what ultimately cost the Germans too much manpower.

  • @joosiekawk
    @joosiekawk ปีที่แล้ว +183

    correction: there are more J-20's in service than the F-22 today...there are over 200+ J-20's and more are being built. While the US has 170ish F-22? and that's it.

    • @aaron6493
      @aaron6493 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      200 🤣🤣🤣🤣 are they flying on their own. You need specialized pilots to do that.

    • @joosiekawk
      @joosiekawk ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aaron6493 there are more credible pilots than there are j-20s. As the j-20s are now undergoing mass-producing using the finalized ws-15 engine, expect to see at least half a thousand J-20s in the skies by 2035

    • @aaron6493
      @aaron6493 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@joosiekawk mass producing a plane that has engine issues? What "wise".

    • @aaron6493
      @aaron6493 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@joosiekawk the J20 is a great fighter but now the challenge starts with the next phase which is monitoring/improving/upgrades/tests etc. Even with new engines this is part of execution & improvement of all human-made technology on this planet. Something that the US has been doing for 20+ years with the Raptor F22 fleet. So China is 20 years behind in this phase in comparison with the USA. Again remember that the upgraded Raptors are 5+ th gen and J20 is still an early 5th gen in development. With development I do not mean production, but test/monitoring/improvements design/upgrades/tests etc.

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@aaron6493 LOL, where did you get the news that Raptors are being upgraded?

  • @Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm
    @Vhvjdow0ajsbcdhcuei3o22-om4sm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    The J-20 actually has quite a few variants, not only does it have 2 and single seat variants, but it also has 3 different types of engines, when it was first made it used imported Russian engines (cant remember which one) and then transitioned to an upgraded WS-10 used on the J-10C and J-15 and now it uses the WS-15 engine.

    • @ado5182
      @ado5182 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Its copy ru engines... ru engines is copy from FRA and US...very old engines

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok joker😂😂😂​@@ado5182

    • @АндрейМ-ф5н
      @АндрейМ-ф5н 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​тебя скопировали с бабуина😂😂😂

    • @ado5182
      @ado5182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@АндрейМ-ф5н я рад что ты показал какой ты дурак! Молодец. Но самое смешное что про авиацию ты нечего не знаешь

    • @齐王-x9g
      @齐王-x9g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@ado5182Sorry, the J20 in China uses the domestically developed and produced WS10 engine, and the latest Ws15 engine is also equipped in the latest batch of aircraft.

  • @CheeLiekHo
    @CheeLiekHo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

    The J20 has front canards but the F20 and F35 do not use canards. It is a totally different design in aerodynamics. But strange that the commentator keeps saying there are similarities and China must have stolen data. In engineering there is a concept of convergence of design. That is given a set of physical and chemical principles to solve an engineering design problem the solution looks similar. For example bows and arrows. In prehistoric times with little or no communications, isolated countries or communities have bows and arrows. Although different in size, lengths and materials all bows and arrows look similar.

    • @johnghilduta3016
      @johnghilduta3016 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I like the concept “convergence of design “ and I knows for long time is absolutely true.

    • @pinkppagi8228
      @pinkppagi8228 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Internal bay engineering is what they copy and pasted

    • @pinkppagi8228
      @pinkppagi8228 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They are forced to used canadas and larger wing due to weak engine output

    • @m.a3914
      @m.a3914 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Similarities from inside and not necessarily outside

    • @ronnieraptor
      @ronnieraptor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      When you copy very technical designs, you just say, its a 'Convergence of Design' just like bows and arrows then all the morons will clap their hands... Then you got peace of mind...

  • @douginorlando6260
    @douginorlando6260 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    China must be working out strategies on how best to use combined mixes of J20, non stealth fighters, and old generation fighters converted into drones. And now add loyal drone wingman to the mix. Now add Various Missile load outs including future missiles under development. The last key variable is sensor networks on the ground, in the air and in orbit and ECM aircraft

    • @dfmrcv862
      @dfmrcv862 ปีที่แล้ว

      They might... But fact is, they're playing catch up... And I'd prefer we keep it that way.

    • @aaron6493
      @aaron6493 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dfmrcv862 do you know the new laser tech of the US? There is no catch up. Nothing in the sky will survive.

    • @dfmrcv862
      @dfmrcv862 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aaron6493 shhh!!! Don't tell Congress that! They'll get complacent and may demand cuts to defense!

    • @aaron6493
      @aaron6493 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dfmrcv862 you should know that laser tech is by far cheaper than those missiles, so I am pretty sure congress would be eager to get rid of missiles tech.

    • @timfarley274
      @timfarley274 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Their best strategy is to eject.

  • @beest_
    @beest_ ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Both can fly, beyond that it's like comparing apples with oranges.

    • @frank-ko6de
      @frank-ko6de 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      J-20 looks like a fake orange. Hahahaha.

    • @xiaoxiao-wk2mz
      @xiaoxiao-wk2mz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@frank-ko6de因为太科幻的东西出现在现实会让你们觉得不可思议

    • @Videodirektor1
      @Videodirektor1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      china are copycats

  • @scottfoster5817
    @scottfoster5817 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Just an FYI - there are at least 150 J-20s in service at this time with some experts in Chinese military aviation believing there might be more than 200 now flying. I'm not sure where the 74 in-service number came from but that's not accurate.

    • @神成子
      @神成子 ปีที่แล้ว

      240

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@神成子 vs 1000 F-35

    • @jefflai6077
      @jefflai6077 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@SelfProclaimedEmperorthe 1000 F35s are not in one place, how many you can gather at one time.😂😂😂

    • @lukecarroll4052
      @lukecarroll4052 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jefflai6077 I mean china is pretty big too but sure this is a pointless argument, these countries should never go to war or they and the rest of the world will fall apart.

  • @ronaldwang9838
    @ronaldwang9838 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    J-20's maximum speed is 2.55 Mach when equipped with WS-10C engines(China's state media once reported that J-20's pilot said J-20 flied 52 kilometers per minute. That is 2.55 Mach), J-20's maximum speed is 2.8 Mach when equipped with WS-15 engines. The total number of J-20 in service is more than 200 right now. Media revealed that production capacity of J-20 production lines is 120 per year.

    • @李大人-m7p
      @李大人-m7p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      2.0

    • @Truth-will-prevail786
      @Truth-will-prevail786 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂😂
      What they showed in Afghanistan
      That's we all seee😂😂😂😂

    • @DaniHaldar-qk5zg
      @DaniHaldar-qk5zg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chinese slave spotted...

    • @m.a3914
      @m.a3914 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is a mach 2 jet and the production rate is in the tens not hundreds.

    • @孙笑川-g1y
      @孙笑川-g1y 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      exggrated, i think it can't be that much

  • @Spikyzzzz
    @Spikyzzzz ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Still better than Russia

    • @justice32legends
      @justice32legends ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Way better actually. But canards, really?

    • @GLORY-TO-ENTROPY
      @GLORY-TO-ENTROPY ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@justice32legends why? It looks cool

    • @milanradovanovic3693
      @milanradovanovic3693 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Better by what measure? The fact that you amateurs watched for years how US propaganda showed you how 5th gen plane looks like? Are you people aware that none of these planes, 5th gen, can enter any kind of fight with su35 and exit alive. Su 35 has rockets almost 400 kms range, and about dog fight dont wanna discuss. Some un important measure like radar crosssection has been lifted like a diety... And thats radio electronics engeneer talking that is me

    • @penguinxed
      @penguinxed ปีที่แล้ว +4

      anything is better than Russia

    • @milanradovanovic3693
      @milanradovanovic3693 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@penguinxed Yes for those of you educated by CNN and Hollywood i agree. Now that you have nuclear scientist into Biden's stuff which are not just trans but also have sex with animals you Will definetly fight your way into prosperity

  • @theratrace5826
    @theratrace5826 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Key phrase: on the ground. Dollars to donuts this plane vaporware.

  • @dylanhutchison8629
    @dylanhutchison8629 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ripping off patents and ignoring structural tolerances, pfff good luck with that. All that expensive junk useless against modern techniques

  • @francishubertovasquez956
    @francishubertovasquez956 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    The J-20 Stealth Fighter Jet of China is a clear long range fighter Jet of China due to its large frame and larger fuel tank with one of the World's long range missiles if not the longest range missiles the PL-15 much longer range than Europe's Meteor missiles though the Meteor is more advanced. The radars and sensors of J-20 is classified, a secret they maintained until it is used in combat. Will the China- India conflict uncover the capability of J-20 Stealth fighter jet if it's used in that battle arena.

    • @biochemwang2421
      @biochemwang2421 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Well, an Indian media claimed that Su30-MKI can easily detect J-20s over the border with its radar. What a joke.

    • @MrDocbowman
      @MrDocbowman ปีที่แล้ว

      J-20 is junk after Russia tech was used in them. Guidance system is vulnerable.

    • @kisuke47
      @kisuke47 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@biochemwang2421 That is because the J-20's had their radar reflectors on. They would only take them off during combat, so of course they could be easily detected.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is designed to fight America and will be used in that role if anywhere.

    • @zhangmengmin5645
      @zhangmengmin5645 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@biochemwang2421 Apparently, Indians don’t know about Longbo lens yet

  • @parthasdasgupta
    @parthasdasgupta ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I think it's a very sleek plane. Look wise awesome. I am not a technical guy but engine nozzles are not covered! How they minimize IR signatures? Can anyone please elaborate.

    • @tdolan500
      @tdolan500 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Common theme with Chinese and Russian “stealth” aircraft. Have the outward appearance of having stealth features but are missing the less glamorous details such as the correct nozzles, frameless canopies etc.
      I feel these aircraft are produced for the purpose of optics rather than having a major military value. The reality is the US is still decades ahead in technology and capability.

    • @parthasdasgupta
      @parthasdasgupta ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tdolan500 Thank you Sir.

    • @parthasdasgupta
      @parthasdasgupta ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertm5160 Sir IR missiles don't follow exhaust of a jet engine. It track hot part of it. Part of the J20's engine is exposed and thus easier for IR missiles to track. F35's engine nozzle is also open. ( otherwise how the gas will pass) but beside the nozzle no other part is exposed. So lesser IR signature. I think you also know that.

    • @Emphasis213
      @Emphasis213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The nozzles do have stealth features. If you look closely it has serrations to reflect some of the RF. Also it is not like the f22 because round nozzles are more efficient. They are maximizing the power from the engines by leaving the nozzles round.

    • @paullittizzio234
      @paullittizzio234 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Raptor's engines are probably extremely efficient, as well as an order of magnitude more stealthy than any round nozzles out there... which is basically everything OTHER than a -22.
      If there was any sort of tangible efficiency issue, it doesn't seem that any the countries that are trying to develop rectangular nozzles care much about it.

  • @rodyep3136
    @rodyep3136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jets are just delivery platforms, who has the best air-to-air missile.

    • @lynnabel258
      @lynnabel258 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good point

  • @nbgoodiscore1303
    @nbgoodiscore1303 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Same exact speed?
    "Nah, It must have been the wind"

  • @TripleNpple
    @TripleNpple 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just remembered those engines aren't the same as the F35 they have a huge thermal print and also not stealth capable at all... 😅

  • @crypty9365
    @crypty9365 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    As a Chinese person, I must say the J20 is getting close to F-22, but F-22 was built over 20 years ago, there must be new advanced fighter jets already developed by the US military, so there is no need to argue at air superiority at this time.

    • @akk9196
      @akk9196 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      They had trouble shooting down your balloons, y'all are safe.
      If goat herders in Hiluxes can best them, you'll have no problem reclaiming Taiwan without having to shoot a single bullet.

    • @crypty9365
      @crypty9365 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akk9196 lol thats funny

    • @thyhandsonuslyngdoh6562
      @thyhandsonuslyngdoh6562 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@akk9196Can you compare the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the United States operation in Afghanistan. No you definitely cannot. America's was there to help the Afghan government and usually carried out small operations or air operations against Taliban targets. The Taliban got their ass kicked and had to hightail it to Pakistan (who provide shelter, weapons).

    • @darkevola7975
      @darkevola7975 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@akk9196Lmao, a china simp arguing with an actual chinese. You are so desperate to prove China can even match US that you argue with a chinese guy. And goat herders didnt win, the americans simply left. And the chinese have been beaten by filipinos, indians, vietnamese in just the past 30 years bro. Taiwan will only need a tenth of its air force to drown the entire chinese air force.

    • @rmstark1966
      @rmstark1966 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Actually they keep updating the F22. Because of lack of stealth in the J20 is very comparable. With the J20 and F35 hardly have a payload unless they carry under wings and lose all stealth. F22 carries more in the belly. The range of the radar of J20 and F22 are close, F22 has 200km, J20 has 170km. At their speeds that is mute point. I have always said even with crappy range of flight, I would still take a Raptor over the others

  • @mycoolbeernuts6870
    @mycoolbeernuts6870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the J-20 going to Data Link wth a Balloon? - Having a vast arsenal of battlespace intelligence is where it's at - It guides the Boom to the Goon

  • @robam3801
    @robam3801 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    if its made by the same people and with the same care and attention as my toaster is we need not worry

    • @ceesj.m.lanting2669
      @ceesj.m.lanting2669 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about your iPhone or PC ?

    • @zwen3763
      @zwen3763 ปีที่แล้ว

      The factory don't decide what to make, the customers do. Pay up, we got you covered. Don't be a cheap ass no more.

    • @garyeuscher4499
      @garyeuscher4499 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Designed and chips not made in China.
      Assembled in China
      So what

  • @Whaleydavey
    @Whaleydavey 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It doesn’t look very manoeuvrable when turning. It looks too long between cockpit and tail, a bit like the British Vulcan bombers. I think if they shorten the plane, it will perform better.

  • @Lightning206
    @Lightning206 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Clearly the f-22 isn't secret enough if the j-20 has similar air frame parts

    • @brandongriffin79
      @brandongriffin79 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stolen technology bum

    • @PatrickF7
      @PatrickF7 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      similar???

    • @srs6461
      @srs6461 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It does not look similar at all.

    • @khemrajsahai5678
      @khemrajsahai5678 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Chinese stole all the tech through their cyber security team hacking western systems for 2 decades.
      J20 is just a nice show piece with nothing in it to fight and win.

  • @dallasyap3064
    @dallasyap3064 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    F-22 RCS is significantly smaller than the J-20

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It serves no purpose against J-20.
      It is good to invade enemy airspace and hit the target and flee.

    • @byhyew
      @byhyew ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're either exposing classified intel or talking about things you don't know. Better stop it either way...

    • @tsugutakameyer8912
      @tsugutakameyer8912 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@byhyew Canards. Ever heard of em

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The F-22 wold be detected and targeted through the J-20's IRST long before the AESA radars of each aircraft detect each other.

  • @didip5602
    @didip5602 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The external appearance can be imitated, but it is not easy to imitate the technology, because aircraft or combat equipment is not about the appearance but the technology used.

  • @codelessunlimited7701
    @codelessunlimited7701 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Both aircraft was never tested in real life scenario. China wins this one because of its long range capabilities. The Chinese aircraft seems to get a lot from the Russian technology and engineering. But it is good to see a new aircraft and does not need an entire GDP of the country to fund the program.

    • @eugenenunn4900
      @eugenenunn4900 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Chinese win nothing. Inferior stealth and air-to-air missiles. They also lack number and pilot training.

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Uh, no. Long range missiles mean nothing if you cant see your enemy. The J-20 is like 20 feet longer than the F-22...F-22 will see J-20 long before J-20 can see the F-22.

    • @darkevola7975
      @darkevola7975 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      except that China can only develop such technologies by copying other projects as there's not a single shred of innovation in the Chinese gene 😂😂. must be the effect of eating all those urine soaked eggs after all.

    • @michaelwan4268
      @michaelwan4268 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can not only rely on Airplane to detect stealth fighter. @@SelfProclaimedEmperor

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow you really don’t understand what you’re talking about lmao

  • @tty2020
    @tty2020 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wrong info in the video. There are 150 J20 in service. And it is a better stealth plane than F35.

  • @MrGriff305-j7s
    @MrGriff305-j7s 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    it looks pretty legit.. they copy very well

  • @seycheles27
    @seycheles27 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That thing is huge. It will be as stealthy as a school bus.

    • @ProAvgeek6328
      @ProAvgeek6328 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      wtf? size does not mean bad stealth!

    • @jasonlee148
      @jasonlee148 ปีที่แล้ว

      By that logic militaries should be using amazon drones to carry out strike and bombing missions .

    • @JohnDoe-jp4em
      @JohnDoe-jp4em ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The B-2 is twice as big and very stealthy, and the F-22 is just a meter shorter.

    • @adamc2378
      @adamc2378 ปีที่แล้ว

      truly living up to your name

  • @nightwing.3378
    @nightwing.3378 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This plane look epic,

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh ปีที่แล้ว +19

    All j20, f22 and f35 is different In terms of roles.
    J20: long range fighter
    F22: aggressive dogfight fighter
    F35: b2 spirit but less bombs and faster.

    • @hedgeearthridge6807
      @hedgeearthridge6807 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The F-35 doesn't even need to ever dogfight, it can destroy threats from an entirely different country before they even know they're under attack, like happened in the Iran-Iraq War. It's like a mini B2 with better stealth, that can use the best missiles the world currently has. I heard it's an absolute nightmare trying to get new-ish missiles to work with old planes, especially the F-16.

    • @byhyew
      @byhyew ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@hedgeearthridge6807 The American Pacific Command would argue otherwise. They did mentioned how their F35s were intercepted by J20s. So not so much about undetectable.

    • @kiro9257
      @kiro9257 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@byhyewI believe all LO aircrafts in peacetime have Luneberg lenses installed in the fuselage to avoid proper reading of the RCS. I think this is the reason why the Indians saw the J-20, the Americans with the J-20 and vise versa for the Chinese.
      It makes sense actually since there’s no reason to reveal your cards when there’s no reason to do so.

    • @Silicon12340
      @Silicon12340 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      F-22 is not meant for dogfights. It's for air superiority mainly

    • @Absolut531kmh
      @Absolut531kmh ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Silicon12340 Though it's the best dogfighter out of the three that's what I'm tryna say

  • @abusaleh2222
    @abusaleh2222 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US F-22 & US F-35 & Chinese J-20 & Chinese Fc-31 & Turkish KANN & Korea KF-21 & Russa Su-27 & Russa Su-35 & Russa Mig-35 & Russa Su-57 and others are similar, However the greatest innovator is Russa and the others are just coping and improving the quality

  • @bertjilk3456
    @bertjilk3456 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Quick reminder: nine months ago, videos just like this one talked about how powerful Russia's military was, including their 4th & 5th gen fighters. That all turned out to be complete rubbish. More well-choreographed propaganda (that many believed) than actual reality. When push came to shove, Russia was/is rather pathetic.
    We don't know much about the J-20, but I don't think it's nearly as capable as many suggest. They do look the part, just like the much vaunted SU-57 (where has that been, BTW?). In short, not much to worry about, get on with your lives. 😅

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      And Russian GDP is equivalent to that of a third rate Chinese province, while China is churning out more engineers per year than the total population of engineers in America.

    • @Nainara32
      @Nainara32 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To paraphrase Warren Buffet, "It's only when the tide goes out that you learn if Chinese manufacturers have been swimming naked."

    • @lcplapiata5501
      @lcplapiata5501 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      When you believe in the ghost of Kyiv 😂🤣

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thomaszhang3101 their posting out more scientific papers as well

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Russian jets had outdated avionics. I mean they're the only 4++ gen fighters still using PESA radars.
      In theory China's jets seem to be more advanced

  • @tinto278
    @tinto278 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    J-20 primary mission is for taking out US, Japanese and Australian AWACS's and Tankers. WVR or "Within Visual Range" is its second mission and its too heavy and fat to do it well.

    • @l.a.xgunner
      @l.a.xgunner ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same with the Russia A2A missiles. Most of their newer models were designed to knock out Western AWACS.

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's still lighter than the F15 so I don't see exactly why it can't do well in WVR, whats it's bigger problem is actually is the lack of a cannon for dogfighting

    • @thejeffinvade
      @thejeffinvade ปีที่แล้ว +5

      J20 is more of a hybrid between an attack aircraft and a flighter. Since China doesn't have stealth bombers yet, they will have a great role to play on air to surface attacks.

    • @thejeffinvade
      @thejeffinvade ปีที่แล้ว +8

      J 20 has F35 style EOTS which will make a big difference in helping them spot F22 first.
      Assuming both sides will not open their radar which will give away their position, and awacs on both sides can't spot incoming flighters until it's too late.

    • @aztronomy7457
      @aztronomy7457 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thejeffinvade youtube is illegal in China

  • @ericliume
    @ericliume ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Number in service is not 74 but ~200

  • @ExternalPress
    @ExternalPress 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of course Locked Martin ..

  • @Twirlyhead
    @Twirlyhead 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Two warring countries send all of their respective stealth fighter fleets up to fight each other in one big _settler_ air battle. All aircraft from both sides return safely to their bases with _nothing to report._

  • @josef596
    @josef596 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They copy and pasted it from a Satelite image. 😂

  • @joselee9605
    @joselee9605 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The US is strong because their people worked hard. To compete with China , every person in the US has to pull the weight of 4 Chinese people. And now, considering the modern generation in the comment section is still relying on the head start given to them by previous generations guarantees they will lose that head start .

    • @englishparcc1989
      @englishparcc1989 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, the US is stronger than China also because it didn't have its country destroyed by WW2 and a civil war immediately afterwards, and before that centuries of Western imperialism

    • @garyeuscher4499
      @garyeuscher4499 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don’t blame Chinese incompetence and backwardness on other countries.
      China is and has been corrupt, well before the white man arrived

  • @IamCooper-rk5bn
    @IamCooper-rk5bn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nobody is worried. South Korea has their home grown stealth fighter KAI KF-21 Boramae nicknamed ‘Son of the Raptor’ which was a joint venture between Lockheed and KAI. Japan is working on their 6th gen stealth fighter the Mitsubishi X2 and not to mention the US has AF bases in South Korea and Japan which on occasions has the F22s and both Japan and South Korea has the F35s in their fleet. Go ahead China mess around.

  • @MrAero_1
    @MrAero_1 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The J-20 just doesn't compare to them at all. China can boost up themselves all they want , just like Russia did and we all know how that turned out. The F-35 and F-22 are more than just a stealth body, the technology in them are decades ahead

    • @sneakymove
      @sneakymove ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya. Same like china space station, Beidou Navigation Satelite , 5G technology, 6G, high speed rail, hypersonic missiles....they are all decades away compare to US. Those are all fakes in China, and doesn't exist. Its just plain impossible chinese can invent those technologies. Those tech must be stolen from US. Eventho US might not have it yet, but yea, it Must be stolen from somewhere or someone in US. Only Anglo Saxon kind have that kind of brain.
      US is the most powerfulllll, just as US people are the smartesttttt of all ....like forever.....even no alien species can defeat US....
      Are u happy to hear all that? U win.
      Hahahaha!

    • @pell9538
      @pell9538 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The stealth and especially the sensors of the f35 specifically are the most advanced in the world no doubt about it but i wouldnt scoff at what china's done. They've leaped forward technologically at a very fast rate and left their father Russia in the dust, i wouldnt underestimate them.

    • @VittonLou
      @VittonLou ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly, it's just all about the hype.

    • @gazzman6547
      @gazzman6547 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pell9538 Ah yes. They've leaped forward technologically by stealing US technologies and still behind of F22's 30 years old tech. Very impressive china. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

    • @GrowFoodSustainably
      @GrowFoodSustainably 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pell9538 By my understanding the J20 pilots will, in a dog fight, deliberately fall into a 'take missile hit' position so that rearward air-to-air missile(s) are fired at pursuing American fighter planes. This 'pretend to retreat' tactic has been used for a couple of thousand years

  • @jamierawles5028
    @jamierawles5028 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Chinas answer to the F22 Raptor tells you everything you need to know about them. They're contending with a plane that's some 20 years older. Always playing catch up.

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well duh. The point is china 70 years ago was poorer and more backwards than Africa. Now they have their own 5th gen planes, biggest economy by PPP, own aircraft carrier, own gps, own space station, landed on moon and mars, etc etc.
      China already leads USA in industries and technologies, like 5g, green tech, AI, high speed rail, quantum tech, etc.

    • @jasonlee148
      @jasonlee148 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your white house is scared of a country that always play catch up?

    • @nix123ism
      @nix123ism ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So what? The funny thing about the US war machine is , they go on and on about how they spend trillions of $ , have the most tech advanced military , the best trained and equiped soldiers when the reality is only in the results it delivers and looking at how many conflicts they have actually won since WW2 , 1 , Iraq, the rest have been withdrawals, stalemates or losses, their "advanced" military doesn't seem to produce any results that you would expect a military of that standing to produce, let alone protect the US from any attack, hell, the last time the US was attacked, 9/11 , 3 men entered the US legally, got trained up by US avaiation schools and flew 2 planes into the twin towers, how effective was the US military at protecting them from that attack?

    • @ThadJarvis7952
      @ThadJarvis7952 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yup and they still can't beat the F22

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThadJarvis7952 wrong. They would destroy f22. That's why f22 is being retired and only f35 will be used. If they are so good and will Destroy j20, why retire them?
      J20 will have loyal wingman drones with dual seater versions, with missiles that outrange anything usa has. F22 cannot get inside china's anti access area denial range, any us forces which do will be destroyed like a joke, and any fight between china and usa will be in Taiwan or south china seas. It will never be 1on1 or "fair" fight, china holds all the cards fighting in it's backyard under it's rules. Usa will never have the balls to declare war on china again. Even during Vietnam war they didn't go into north Vietnam because china warned them not to even though they obliterated viet's in every fight and could have. This time they listened. After they underestimated china and learned their lesson the hard way in Korean war 70 years ago. They still remember that lesson today. No, usa will never attack or provoke china into direct war vs usa again. Usa cannot afford it. Both china and usa will go from 1st and 2nd to worse than Africa. Africa will be a paradise compared to usa after any war vs china. Usa is not THAT dumb to sacrifice themselves for what, Taiwan? Lol. They are using Taiwan for their benefit, not for their destruction.

  • @nt178
    @nt178 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Probably full of water, like the bombs

  • @hedgeearthridge6807
    @hedgeearthridge6807 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The thing about the F-35 is we don't yet know the specifics of why it's so incredible, all that stuff is classified. But like Lazerpig said, the F-35 is like a gun, and all other planes are like crossbows. They're not even comparable. With modern missiles, it doesn't even need to be in the same country as the enemy. We can't actually make realistic comparisons

    • @jasonlee148
      @jasonlee148 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Such a "badass" plane, still lost in Afghanistan against goat herders.

    • @vincentphan5097
      @vincentphan5097 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jasonlee148 Exactly. I can see J-20 transforming into Optimus prime leading the Barbados 🇧🇧 to victory against Britain on foot

    • @netrubbish
      @netrubbish ปีที่แล้ว +12

      And the F35 has better stealth technology. It can dive into the ocean to hide in the botttom of the sea motionless and and stay silent

    • @MD97531
      @MD97531 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jasonlee148you one of those clowns able to argue the US lost in Afghanistan but Russia is winning in Ukraine? 😂

    • @jsc3417
      @jsc3417 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MD97531 how much land did the US gain in Afghistan over 20 years and how much land did Russia gain in Ukraine in less than one year?

  • @sethsisneros6630
    @sethsisneros6630 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Theyre so stealth in fact they dont even FLY! Just like their Russian counterparts

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      youtube is a usa company

  • @Ianmundo
    @Ianmundo ปีที่แล้ว +6

    for a BVM engagement this is a potent machine, but the sensor fusion of the F35 and dogfighting ability of the F22 would absolutely wreck this giant lump

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I doubt it. It would just outrange those planes and shoot them down with long range missiles.

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Withnail1969 Uh...no. Longer range missiles mean nothing if you cant see your enemy. The F-22 has a RCS of a marble, J-20 has the RCS of a truck tire. F-22 will fire first and leave before J-20 can shoot back.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor oh come on, nobody believes that nonsense. The F22 is visible on radar and China's missiles greatly outrange anything the F22 has. But that doesnt even matter. Know what the J20's primary target is? The fuel tanker planes. They'll shoot those down and the F22s will never reach China.

    • @syrez156
      @syrez156 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Withnail1969 do you even know what you're talking about???

  • @mranonymous8815
    @mranonymous8815 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Problem: are apples or oranges better for nutrition, which is cheaper to cultivate under certain conditions, can they both grow in a certain region, how much water do they consume etc. ?
    Internet: don't compare apples and oranges!

  • @jqmachgunner2577
    @jqmachgunner2577 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new engines still suck as the power output is still very low and the maintenance is 10x higher than all others. The Mighty Dragon is really China's Puny Dragon.

  • @Issavibe3
    @Issavibe3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    China has 128 of them as of feb 2023 ..and all combat ready ,your estimation of 74 almost 3 months ago was not accurate at all.. the US has 123 and that doesn’t exclude non combat ready ones

  • @Noobmaster-yc2pf
    @Noobmaster-yc2pf ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The J-20 looks like a cheap knockoff they tried to copy F-22 it might fall apart if it goes Mach 1.

    • @squeeze999
      @squeeze999 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You must be blind as both aircraft are quite different in execution. The F-22 is being retired soon so they are irrelevant.

  • @stevenmiller6001
    @stevenmiller6001 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    that's so good looking Jet oh my gosh .

  • @jamismirs8353
    @jamismirs8353 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We have a submarine aircraft carrier. Be ready.

  • @MidlandsAviation
    @MidlandsAviation หลายเดือนก่อน

    Got one of these from Temu it's not bad

  • @bigkaswrx8115
    @bigkaswrx8115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just ordered mine off Ebay for £150 free Postage.

  • @zeroneutral
    @zeroneutral 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The plane barely matters any more. Advanced missiles and electronics are what make fifth generation fighters powerful.

  • @regolith1350
    @regolith1350 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Chinese J-20 runs circles around their western competition... in bad CGI.

  • @송수원-o2v
    @송수원-o2v 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    J-20 is a mouth-watering target aircraft

  • @telchinealucard8055
    @telchinealucard8055 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The numbers has increased

  • @jake05sti
    @jake05sti ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don’t believe any of the published capabilities. From either side for that matter. But I’d be willing to bet that the J20s are much more overstated than the F22

  • @cosmicpsyops4529
    @cosmicpsyops4529 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You can copy us, but you'll always be a step behind.

    • @spiketwo666
      @spiketwo666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like the twin towers?

  • @theanalyst0017
    @theanalyst0017 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The thing a lot of people don't understand about the J-20 is that it doesn't actually need on paper superiority to the f-22. The PLAA having a viable stealth fighter in numbers alone is a huge hinderance to any armed conflict with China. It's going to be far more difficult to get f35s (let alone f-22s) into a realistic engagement with China than for the Chinese to field a J-20 (particularly considering that the J-20 nearly doubles the f-35's range.) Other than that, the f-35 has various faults which would make an engagement with a J-20 very difficult such as instability and possible structural damage at speeds greater than or equal to Mach 1, limited payload (compared to the J20B), significantly less low speed high AOA maneuverability (though this issue is secondary), etc.

  • @mobileplayers5008
    @mobileplayers5008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Made in China look cheap

  • @KarlMarch-z6k
    @KarlMarch-z6k หลายเดือนก่อน

    The sheep is the hardest. But i was humbled too many times. So I've learned to not be aggressive. Record will show

  • @kyheel6108
    @kyheel6108 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If they fly like they drive we will be ok

  • @abelambutsi5749
    @abelambutsi5749 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    J 20 is a toy while f 22 is a fighter aircraft

    • @Planecrazydude-on8ho
      @Planecrazydude-on8ho 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ah yes look at the size pictures of ‘the toy’

    • @Sam-vs2vw
      @Sam-vs2vw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if a fully functional stealth combat aircraft platform is only considered a "toy", I wonder what they have that they consider as "fighter aircraft" :)

  • @defaultdummy245
    @defaultdummy245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The equivalent of the dudes in Africa that carve a Ferrari out of wood and put a tuktuk engine inside. China would rather copy exterior appearances and revamp tech that doesn't work rather than innovate. Typical.

  • @nestorsiron826
    @nestorsiron826 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All made in China considered garbagge

  • @Peggyg13
    @Peggyg13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Chinese makes no secret about their ability to copy and replicate stolen technology perfectly. They are so shameless about it and their confidence in showing off Ripped off design is just amazing.

    • @curryzhong3660
      @curryzhong3660 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bro what r u talking about😅there’s no patent when it comes to weapon and military😅 speaking of stealing tech u should question the states why they just took all the German engineers back after ww2

    • @Peggyg13
      @Peggyg13 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@curryzhong3660 so stealing is now a national security objective for the Chinese right ? To Steal every and any technology available. Your obvious pride in what the Chinese does is just baffling.

    • @famousraperandrapperkriswu656
      @famousraperandrapperkriswu656 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sounds easy.. why no country make it? 😆😆🤡🤡

    • @curryzhong3660
      @curryzhong3660 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Peggyg13 ur very funny, if stealing is easy, why dont u see a North Korean version of f22?? is the US that weak that even a developing country can easily "steal" its tech?

    • @curryzhong3660
      @curryzhong3660 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Peggyg13 im sure most americans are still proud of NASA's legendary saturn v rocket, but its chief designer was Wernher von Braun who was German lmfao, are u refering that ur national pride is established by stealing other nation's tech?

  • @SOPPI_srn
    @SOPPI_srn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new paint job is really nice, Looks kinda scifi with the metallic surface

  • @BansheeNT-D
    @BansheeNT-D 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mig 1.44 with a new paintjob?

  • @philipjee4389
    @philipjee4389 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Coming from a uk 🇬🇧 government family with army and navy and mod in my family I have a little insight into things like this all 3 are good but If I was to pick one I would say the USA 🇺🇸 with there F22 is still king 👑 of the skies if it comes to speed the F22 is king 👑 if it comes to power the f22 is still king 👑 but if it comes down to how many jobs a plan can do the f35 lighting type c/a have it covered as for china 🇨🇳 they made a good yet for moving around the skys but it’s to early to know for sure it’s specs but in a dog right your not going to beat the f22 the USA 🇺🇸 have always been ahead of the pack and that’s coming from some one that lives in the uk 🇬🇧 I’m just being honest I’m klad we have a strong relationship 😅 the tf-x is looking like a good yet also

    • @hkjzking3516
      @hkjzking3516 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just say you don't know. So many "kings" in your comments, I guess it's because the queen is dead?

    • @Mr.Deleterious
      @Mr.Deleterious ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cheers from 🇺🇲 🤘🏻🤘🏻

    • @philipjee4389
      @philipjee4389 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr.Deleterious much respect 🫡 I’ve never been to the US but have always wanted to see what’s it’s like I definitely have so much respect 🫡 from all uk 🇬🇧 and USA 🇺🇸 troops from ww2 to now we have always been the backbone of defence and I’m sure as you know the us have many spy planes along with the uk 🇬🇧 not talked about and top secret 🤫 people know as much as are governments are willing to let the public know a lot more happens behind closed doors 🚪 god bless you sir ! And thanks for your comment!

    • @philipjee4389
      @philipjee4389 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hkjzking3516 honestly not funny at all but taking is cheap behind a keyboard ⌨️ i apologise if my spelling was off but then for a second I don’t no why I’m apologising when your user name is what it is before you have a pop maybe come with headline 😅👍I know a lot more then meets the eye shame you’ll only know what you hear on TH-cam videos 😂

    • @englishparcc1989
      @englishparcc1989 ปีที่แล้ว

      Use of punctuation and English proficiency wasn't a requirement in your family's government jobs, huh?

  • @conqueror7574
    @conqueror7574 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    F22 & f35 USA is the best 👍👍👍

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The J-20's "stealth" is about on par with an F/A-18 E/F Superhornet. They've got something like 100 times the radar cross-section of an F-35 and probably 1000 times that of an F-22. Also, their engines are problematic. They're very unreliable and not as powerful as the Chinese intended. Their long range missiles are supposed to be pretty good, though. If it came to a fight, probably the first indication that the Chinese pilot will have that he's actually in a fight is the detonation of an F-35's AIM-120 warhead right next to him.

    • @LaLisa-i3b3f
      @LaLisa-i3b3f ปีที่แล้ว

      带点脑子,j20的雷达发射截面比f22的还小。真像你说的那样跟f18差不多,那么高的造价,中国还会大批量生产j20?这就是国外军迷的智商?

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Where did you get that misinformation from? The su57 is the one with an RCS similar to the F/A-18 not j20. The engines of the J20 are the WS10C which is more reliable and powerful than the russian one it used (the AL30) and can allow the jet to supercruse.
      FYI: the military has said the f35 is actually the more stealthier jet when compared to f22

    • @台独的老父亲
      @台独的老父亲 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      你高兴就好

    • @台独的老父亲
      @台独的老父亲 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@LaLisa-i3b3f 美国人如果都这智商你还怕什么

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@台独的老父亲 'Ae, hau'oli au.

  • @mayi420uplease
    @mayi420uplease 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They cost way more than an f-22 and won’t deploy more than 1 at a time because of cost. Almost twice the size too

  • @teenytinytoons
    @teenytinytoons ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Insane how it looks exactly like the F-22 Raptor.

    • @loyalbeaver9402
      @loyalbeaver9402 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      🤣🤣🤣Precisely! Just like how Biden looks exactly like Obama - even the skin color is the same.

    • @ericliume
      @ericliume ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Where are the canards on F22? Let alone the weapon bay design is totally different.

    • @darkevola7975
      @darkevola7975 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ericliumelmao, even someone with absolutely no knowledge about arms or planes can see the similarity, No use of typing furiously to defend China when the whole world knows they can only replicate, not innovate. This is why "Chinese quality" means fake or unreliable in most nations.

    • @RSCB
      @RSCB 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And better looking

    • @darkevola7975
      @darkevola7975 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RSCB you need to wash your clouded eyes with bleach

  • @Invizable99
    @Invizable99 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Irrelevant Gen 6 is in development , new missiles are the new war tech , turn into little drone stealth fighter swarms dropped from space.

  • @ronaldmarcks1842
    @ronaldmarcks1842 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If the J-20 were truly superior, then we would expect the commercial Chinese C-919 airliner to be fully domestic. Instead, 75% of the value of a C-919 comes from critical western parts, including engines and avionics. That said, the democratic West has never been about mere parity in the air or anywhere else against chronically poor governments, and it would be nice to see clear western military superiority, even if we have to pay for it. It's good the see that the Chinese Communist theft of western IP, especially in computer chips, is finally being addressed.

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's quite a leap in logic -- are you coping that J-20 might be up to par?

    • @ronaldmarcks1842
      @ronaldmarcks1842 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sleepyjoe4529 No leap, but thanks for the kudo. The J-20 has never submitted itself to independent evaluation. Enough said.

    • @zachu1587
      @zachu1587 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ronaldmarcks1842 maybe you can persuade the US military to submitt its F-22 to some third party for so called independt evaluation. lol

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 ปีที่แล้ว

      China isn't in a rush for new airliner designs when it has better trains than you, no one cares about your corrupt valuations you still have deficits with, you don't own democracy, and you don't own the Chinese technology you can only wish to steal.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China needs to give it rest. Airbus and Boeing duopoly is beyond solid, its damn near a force of nature
      The notion they think they can break into the market is beyond absurd especially with the notion of 100 percent Chinese made parts and engines

  • @okeyogiose9229
    @okeyogiose9229 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The J-20 looks impressive but how it compares to an F22 is a big question mark but i'd still say the F22 is probably better in air to air on paper

  • @matthewpron2364
    @matthewpron2364 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At best 4.5 China's track record 3.5 the engine's 2.5 you can have the best airframe they have nothing to hang on the pylons western tec Is far to advanced for them to do something

  • @cashflownpv
    @cashflownpv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regardless of ability it is a good looking plane

  • @joaquinbello222
    @joaquinbello222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont think the guy in the video knows what hes talking about. Wtf does a f22 have to do with a f35. Why would you ever use a f22 where a f35 should be used or vice versa? One is the best for dog fight the other one you wont ever see when he shoots you down from 40 miles away.

  • @nobody-wk6ej
    @nobody-wk6ej ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It looks cool... But like the SU57, it screams paper tiger.

  • @alane8673
    @alane8673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NO MATCH AGAINST F22 OR F-35..........PERIOD. Would make a mockery of the SU-57 Despite,.....why none have taken the chance to challenge the Status Quo.

  • @skylem5373
    @skylem5373 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But it all comes down to the Pilots that have the most flight time with there birds.

    • @thejeffinvade
      @thejeffinvade ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chinese flighter pilots now fly 200-220 hours per year. That's more than the training you get in the US or UK.

  • @adivinaca
    @adivinaca 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    china and russia should be making planes together, they would have better chances of everything that way.i think china can playball jsut fine with everyone terms previously accorded by all parties.

  • @wongmo6429
    @wongmo6429 ปีที่แล้ว

    number forJ-20 in service should be around 150-200, China will manufacture approximately 900 of them.

  • @holycrap8367
    @holycrap8367 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks beautiful, not gonna lie

  • @babypanda2924
    @babypanda2924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:21 is a direct ripoff of a scene from Top Gun: Maverick lol

  • @RobertsDigital
    @RobertsDigital ปีที่แล้ว

    The aircraft looks too clumsy and heavy

  • @markymark3572
    @markymark3572 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's RCS looks huge

  • @RedPixel2023
    @RedPixel2023 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Comparing a J20 to an F22, is utterly a joke, J20 on flight deck stance alone is laughable and every part seems to shake with the smallesr vibration let alone fly, and fight a Raptor. Do you really understand why the US military department downplay every thing about the F22...that should be a big hint to the uninitiated...

  • @procopiomacaspac3087
    @procopiomacaspac3087 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does it compare? Nothing. Its unproven in combat at its pilots are also unproven and not battle tested.

  • @paulgibbons2320
    @paulgibbons2320 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Toys with 'Made in China' stamped on them were always the first to break 😂 bring it on rice pops.

  • @DevoST7972
    @DevoST7972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Military fighters that still have people in them are just for show these days

  • @Naples-Florida
    @Naples-Florida ปีที่แล้ว

    US is retiring 34 F-22 in next year. The total number of F-22 in service is dwindling whereas J-20 production is increasing.

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor ปีที่แล้ว

      That's where the F-35 comes in. 1000 F-35 produced so far, China will never catch up in numbers haha

  • @pinkpurplevlog479
    @pinkpurplevlog479 ปีที่แล้ว

    Comparing...or ... copying?

  • @bikashdas3146
    @bikashdas3146 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    going by stats, J-20 looks more potent

  • @fredlandry6170
    @fredlandry6170 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brought to you by the best Chinese computer hackers in the business.

  • @denis3208
    @denis3208 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chinese planes are more than enough to be a shield against US and its satellites, because its nor just planes that are involved but also air defense and Chinese is far superior, but there are other elements as well like long range artillery and ballistic missiles which can target bases for example.

  • @truthkeeperfilms
    @truthkeeperfilms 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:27 those specs aren't what makes the F22 what it is.....

  • @luasmartinez1262
    @luasmartinez1262 ปีที่แล้ว

    J-20 is a paper tiger, it IS NOT stealth at all, it is low visibility. No thrust vectoring. Large. Noisy.