I moved out of the Taylormade PM7MC's and into Titleist T100s in June Michael. I never struggled with the longer irons in the PM7MC's but the T100s longer irons are way more forgiving and you're not giving up much in terms of feel and workability. The T series are a great iron range. I've got a T200 2 iron in the bag which is money.
I moved out of the T100 into the P7MC recently. The T100 is a great iron but I wanted to try something with more weight behind the center of the club face. I've played Mizuno blades since high school and the T100 just didn't feel solid to me when I would pure one. The P7MC is exactly what I was looking for but I've put the T100 4 and 5 iron back in the bag for a bit more forgiveness, especially on thin and heel strikes. I'm curious if you like the feel of the T100 compared to the P7MC. Do you miss the feel of the P7MC at all?
I did the same as Chris, short stint with the Taylor made from my older Ap2s the sold them and went with the t100. More forgiving and better distance control.
I owned the T100’s. And T200’s. I played the Titleist MB and sold the T’s. Last week I bought the TM P7MC. They play pretty much identical to my Titleist MB’s. I actually like them a lot. Will probably play them the rest of the year, into next year.
Especially the spin number for me. I just went to the P7MC from the T100 and my spin numbers are right where I want them. There's something slightly off about the T100. I think it's the lack of mass behind the center of the club face.
I don’t think they are changing them. I heard they are offering them in all black. Too many tour pros are playing them and I doubt they will want to change irons and I’m sure Titleist doesn’t want their tour staff to play old irons.
@@colonelangus3826 I bought some T100s a month ago and I was thinking about waiting for a new version this summer but when the black ones came out it made me think they're going to wait a while to release a new version. I'm not sure how they're supposed to improve on this iron. They're an incredible option for a guy who's played blades his whole life and isn't quite swinging the club as fast anymore.
The P7 MC compares to the Titliest 620 CB so your comparing two different iron classes the T100 has tec and ideally should be compared to the new P770.
The t150 compares to the p770. The t100 is between the Titleist 620 cb and t150. It doesn’t really have an exact direct comparison to tmag. Still the best players irons on the market for lower single digit to scratch+ golfers
The T100 is nothing like the P770. The T100 looks like a blade at address and is far less forgiving than the P770. The P770 has foam in it for Christ's sake.
I play the t100s just bought them on a whim with shafts I like. I was playing srixonz585 before. The t100s are more consistent and just as long as the srixon 585 for me. Way more forgiving than you’d think for such a compact head
The P7MC is such a gorgeous iron. I find it to be very forgiving and easy to hit. I feel it's more of a lower handicap iron and for a better ball striker. I played the T100 for a season, and I feel they are more of a mid handicap player who needs a bit more help getting the ball in the air.
I am finally thinking about spending some money on my first set of new clubs for myself (I’ve only ever had hand me downs) my current set is a set of delicious AP2s that I love. Would genuinely stick with them until they all are flat but the bottom three grooves of several clubs (pw ,8,7) are basically nonexistent. Debating on getting a full set of new new or just replacing the ones I need and rocking with the rest of the AP2s that I can still use, but not sure if that would lead to inconsistent play and distances due to newer tech etc. Anyone have any thoughts or experiences that may help??
Hi Michael, did you actually pick a winner in this video? I guess it was the Titleist irons you were leaning more towards. Also, why didn't you spend more time looking at the numbers. They flashed up on the screen for only about 2 seconds.
All these clubs are playing catchup to the one and only Wilson Staff CB. Yes, these clubs are nice, but the Wilson Staff CB stands above them all. A true Forged club through-and-through!
Is there an iron that has I tiny tiny more forgiveness than both of these . For example if these were 1.5 / 5 for forgiveness what would be 2 - 2.5 / 5 for forgiveness
The Tours have spoken by making the more tech version, the T100 & T100s far more popular. I was honestly surprised by this release by Taylormade that they didn't bring back / update the 760 which was more like the T100&s with technology but still a player's club. The P7MC is a niche club, like the older Titleist CB - which almost no one plays and I believe Titleist is discontinuing (could be wrong). Mizuno's attempt is the 223 - but I still think the T100s wins here
I game the 223's and Mizuno got it right...and wrong. The T100 seems to have the same tech throughout the set while the 223 only employs it from 7i to 4i. Given the lofts, this creates a bit of a gap between the 7 and 8. I might be tempted to try the T100 for more consistency of gapping. Since I'm fairly certain no one commenting on these videos is a Tour Pro, I would agree that the little bit of help the T100 provides would be beneficial to all of us.
@@xxthadeucexx The 223s are compared to the T100S - not the T100 - as the lofts are the same and the T100S has that speed slot entirely throughout the set. I owned the original year 2008 AP2s - had the speed slot but not tungsten in the corners but completely across the bottom - great clubs. In my opinion, the shrinking of the T100s & S is too much, the AP2 were slightly larger, and as such, there really is a hole in the lineup for better players, who basically want a T100S / 223, with consistent tech like the T100s, but also a tiny bit larger of a club head (like the 2008 AP2s) and a 7-iron loft of 32 degrees (this is really the sweet spot). That the 760 that Taylormade should have re-launched, not this P7mc, and also what the 223 should be - and I'd like to see a T100S+ (with that very slightly larger size). I'm the target market and I find them a tad too small.
@@paulmcgee1867 they don't compare at all - completely different category - hollow head with a springy hot face vs a solid forged face. With the exception of a HOT 4-iron, male, higher swing-speed Pros don't want hollow heads that give more distance but reduce spin because they desire consistency over everything. In the non-Pro world, those who lack consistency to begin with, generally also lack speed so hollow-headed clubs have exploded in popularity.
Srixon is a really good iron. I have the 765’s and the give me the right feedback on mis hits and you know when you hit good. I will give the t100 a try though in a fitting I have in a month.
I have the 7mc but I don’t play enough to hit them the way I would like to. Are the zx7 more forgiving? Based on the specs they seem to be a bigger iron which would help.
Thanks Michael, It was kind of an obvious outcome, I think T100 is a better match to p770 and 620 cb a better match to p7mc. Would certainly like to see those comparisons.
@@Freeride_14 Not really. Both are hollow bodies, but the T200 is 31 deg for a 7-iron which is another two degrees stronger than P770. There is some overlap between different makers but T200 is more squarely in the lower spin + distance category, while the P770 is pretty unique with its forgiving traits while maintaining more traditional lofts. Still feels strong-lofted compared to my MP-32s though.
Nice video very interesting! Next week have fitting for new irons playing i500 at the moment. Thinking about p7mc, t100 or ping i59. What do you think? Hcp 4. 51 years old😅
I saw more consistent striking with the TM. The Titty isn't solid forged if it has tungsten in it. And the pros like all the things you mentioned in the beginning of your vid and one other thing you forgot to mention. Feedback. Very important. The tungsten will take away from that very important feature that comes from a 100% solid forged finger ringing iron. It is better to know what you did wrong than to get away with it. I play Srixon CB's so I have no stake or bias. The ZX7's. Having come from Super GI to players GI then to these ZX7's, I can honestly say that having the feedback has made me a much better and consistent ball striker. It teaches you to hit the sweet spot. Being in love with the feel motivates me.
@@JHOLE21 I have a Titleist Scotty Cameron from 2000 that I bought new. It will never leave my bag. And I play ProV1 and ProV1x. That's it for Titleist in my bag with the exception of an occasional glove I get on sale.
Michael....2 years ago you were carrying the P7MC to 180 yards in your videos, what happened? Your swing speed is slowing down? There was a material change to the club by Taylormade?
Iv got the old p7mc s n if you don't strike them right yes they can punish you abit but for feel they are excellent and good around the greens 🏌🙂👍minus 1 and hit one thin ouch lol 😆
Which part is forged the club head or the face or is it like my Wilson staff tour blades the whole thing is one piece that's a real forged club. This should be called 'semi forged' face, head or whatever? Cannot be fully forged if it is hollow. Is that à fraudulent description? Only asking .
couple years ago when cobra used forged face and stamp forged on their f8 iron a bunch of people were mad about it. But now almost all the major manufacture are doing it now
After watching a lot of your videos PXG 0211st seemed to perform the best in Mia strikes and consistent distance and ball speed or did I miss something thank you
Far greater variation between Taylormade & Titleist when you look at highest & lowest number in each category, wish this was highlighted more in reviews. Good to bear in mind if warmed up 1st mind as if not then the 2nd club may be hit better
taylormade just always seems to come up a little short of the mark , if you want a great players club go titleist or mizuno if you want a great marketing company then go with taylormade.
The Taylormade is gorgeous what an amazing looking iron !
I moved out of the Taylormade PM7MC's and into Titleist T100s in June Michael.
I never struggled with the longer irons in the PM7MC's but the T100s longer irons are way more forgiving and you're not giving up much in terms of feel and workability. The T series are a great iron range. I've got a T200 2 iron in the bag which is money.
I moved out of the T100 into the P7MC recently. The T100 is a great iron but I wanted to try something with more weight behind the center of the club face. I've played Mizuno blades since high school and the T100 just didn't feel solid to me when I would pure one. The P7MC is exactly what I was looking for but I've put the T100 4 and 5 iron back in the bag for a bit more forgiveness, especially on thin and heel strikes. I'm curious if you like the feel of the T100 compared to the P7MC. Do you miss the feel of the P7MC at all?
I did the same as Chris, short stint with the Taylor made from my older Ap2s the sold them and went with the t100. More forgiving and better distance control.
I owned the T100’s. And T200’s. I played the Titleist MB and sold the T’s. Last week I bought the TM P7MC. They play pretty much identical to my Titleist MB’s. I actually like them a lot. Will probably play them the rest of the year, into next year.
Spinrate, Height and landing angle, for me would be the MC
Those are the top 3 numbers I look at with any iron.
Especially the spin number for me. I just went to the P7MC from the T100 and my spin numbers are right where I want them. There's something slightly off about the T100. I think it's the lack of mass behind the center of the club face.
Taylormade did use the tungsten in P750s but went away from it in the P7MCs.
Great comparison and video as always.
great video !! the t100 is just a fantastic iron, not sure titleist will be able to improve on these when the new model comes out in spring
I don’t think they are changing them. I heard they are offering them in all black. Too many tour pros are playing them and I doubt they will want to change irons and I’m sure Titleist doesn’t want their tour staff to play old irons.
@@colonelangus3826 I bought some T100s a month ago and I was thinking about waiting for a new version this summer but when the black ones came out it made me think they're going to wait a while to release a new version. I'm not sure how they're supposed to improve on this iron. They're an incredible option for a guy who's played blades his whole life and isn't quite swinging the club as fast anymore.
What a great video
I really like both of these clubs
Thanks for the in depth review
Any chance we can see a T150 vs P7CB comparison? Your swing and tempo are pure. Great for comparisons.
I’ll try my best to
The P7 MC compares to the Titliest 620 CB so your comparing two different iron classes the T100 has tec and ideally should be compared to the new P770.
The t150 compares to the p770. The t100 is between the Titleist 620 cb and t150. It doesn’t really have an exact direct comparison to tmag. Still the best players irons on the market for lower single digit to scratch+ golfers
+1
The T100 is nothing like the P770. The T100 looks like a blade at address and is far less forgiving than the P770. The P770 has foam in it for Christ's sake.
I play T100 and cant imagine ever switching, they are so pure feeling and very forgiving for their size. Great video!
Play the T100S and love them to death. Feels like butter off the face
I play the t100s just bought them on a whim with shafts I like. I was playing srixonz585 before. The t100s are more consistent and just as long as the srixon 585 for me. Way more forgiving than you’d think for such a compact head
My new T100S irons are scary good.
The P7MC is such a gorgeous iron. I find it to be very forgiving and easy to hit. I feel it's more of a lower handicap iron and for a better ball striker. I played the T100 for a season, and I feel they are more of a mid handicap player who needs a bit more help getting the ball in the air.
Mid handicap? Like the 40 guys on the PGA tour that play the T100?
The spin difference is crazy.
Good review, thanks!
Perhaps the 770 is a better match to the T100 ?
No, p770 hollow, stronger loft
I am finally thinking about spending some money on my first set of new clubs for myself (I’ve only ever had hand me downs) my current set is a set of delicious AP2s that I love. Would genuinely stick with them until they all are flat but the bottom three grooves of several clubs (pw ,8,7) are basically nonexistent. Debating on getting a full set of new new or just replacing the ones I need and rocking with the rest of the AP2s that I can still use, but not sure if that would lead to inconsistent play and distances due to newer tech etc. Anyone have any thoughts or experiences that may help??
Hi Michael, did you actually pick a winner in this video? I guess it was the Titleist irons you were leaning more towards. Also, why didn't you spend more time looking at the numbers. They flashed up on the screen for only about 2 seconds.
2 of the irons I would be looking at!
All these clubs are playing catchup to the one and only Wilson Staff CB. Yes, these clubs are nice, but the Wilson Staff CB stands above them all. A true Forged club through-and-through!
T100S currently in the bag. Only the Miura TC201 could tempt me enough to change.
F J B
I completely agree
Is there an iron that has I tiny tiny more forgiveness than both of these . For example if these were 1.5 / 5 for forgiveness what would be 2 - 2.5 / 5 for forgiveness
P770
Great pick. I don't have enough game and wish Titleist made a T150s 😅
Good call this 👀
These clubs are 2 different animals, nowhere near the same. T100 is a tech iron, while the P7MC is a classic blade with a cavity.
The Tours have spoken by making the more tech version, the T100 & T100s far more popular. I was honestly surprised by this release by Taylormade that they didn't bring back / update the 760 which was more like the T100&s with technology but still a player's club. The P7MC is a niche club, like the older Titleist CB - which almost no one plays and I believe Titleist is discontinuing (could be wrong). Mizuno's attempt is the 223 - but I still think the T100s wins here
I game the 223's and Mizuno got it right...and wrong. The T100 seems to have the same tech throughout the set while the 223 only employs it from 7i to 4i. Given the lofts, this creates a bit of a gap between the 7 and 8. I might be tempted to try the T100 for more consistency of gapping. Since I'm fairly certain no one commenting on these videos is a Tour Pro, I would agree that the little bit of help the T100 provides would be beneficial to all of us.
Agree, the re release of 760 would have been a better option & then probably seeing more golfers move into it. MC is more niche.
How does the 770 compare to the T100? Thanks Michael.
@@xxthadeucexx The 223s are compared to the T100S - not the T100 - as the lofts are the same and the T100S has that speed slot entirely throughout the set. I owned the original year 2008 AP2s - had the speed slot but not tungsten in the corners but completely across the bottom - great clubs. In my opinion, the shrinking of the T100s & S is too much, the AP2 were slightly larger, and as such, there really is a hole in the lineup for better players, who basically want a T100S / 223, with consistent tech like the T100s, but also a tiny bit larger of a club head (like the 2008 AP2s) and a 7-iron loft of 32 degrees (this is really the sweet spot). That the 760 that Taylormade should have re-launched, not this P7mc, and also what the 223 should be - and I'd like to see a T100S+ (with that very slightly larger size). I'm the target market and I find them a tad too small.
@@paulmcgee1867 they don't compare at all - completely different category - hollow head with a springy hot face vs a solid forged face. With the exception of a HOT 4-iron, male, higher swing-speed Pros don't want hollow heads that give more distance but reduce spin because they desire consistency over everything. In the non-Pro world, those who lack consistency to begin with, generally also lack speed so hollow-headed clubs have exploded in popularity.
Nice comparison. I prefer the ZX7 over both.
Srixon is a really good iron. I have the 765’s and the give me the right feedback on mis hits and you know when you hit good. I will give the t100 a try though in a fitting I have in a month.
I have the 7mc but I don’t play enough to hit them the way I would like to. Are the zx7 more forgiving? Based on the specs they seem to be a bigger iron which would help.
I’m switching to p7mc from zx7s and think the forgiveness is similar. Only slightly leaning to the zx7
Definitely, I’d have the PXG 0211 st irons and mizuno tour as well
I found the ZX7 were down on spin when I tried them with the 7MC’s
Thanks Michael, It was kind of an obvious outcome, I think T100 is a better match to p770 and 620 cb a better match to p7mc. Would certainly like to see those comparisons.
I think the T100 as same loft as MC, blade length etc a good match but agree 620cb could also be put into the mix 👍
P770 is comparable to the t200 bot t100
@@Freeride_14 Not really. Both are hollow bodies, but the T200 is 31 deg for a 7-iron which is another two degrees stronger than P770. There is some overlap between different makers but T200 is more squarely in the lower spin + distance category, while the P770 is pretty unique with its forgiving traits while maintaining more traditional lofts. Still feels strong-lofted compared to my MP-32s though.
Nice video very interesting! Next week have fitting for new irons playing i500 at the moment. Thinking about p7mc, t100 or ping i59. What do you think? Hcp 4. 51 years old😅
I saw more consistent striking with the TM. The Titty isn't solid forged if it has tungsten in it. And the pros like all the things you mentioned in the beginning of your vid and one other thing you forgot to mention. Feedback. Very important. The tungsten will take away from that very important feature that comes from a 100% solid forged finger ringing iron. It is better to know what you did wrong than to get away with it. I play Srixon CB's so I have no stake or bias. The ZX7's. Having come from Super GI to players GI then to these ZX7's, I can honestly say that having the feedback has made me a much better and consistent ball striker. It teaches you to hit the sweet spot. Being in love with the feel motivates me.
The T100 is the most played iron on tour I believe
@@JHOLE21 I have a Titleist Scotty Cameron from 2000 that I bought new. It will never leave my bag. And I play ProV1 and ProV1x. That's it for Titleist in my bag with the exception of an occasional glove I get on sale.
Should have done the MC vs. Titleist CB
Have T100 definitely interested in the mc’s
T100 with an adjustable head?
It’s a fitting head 👍
Michael....2 years ago you were carrying the P7MC to 180 yards in your videos, what happened? Your swing speed is slowing down? There was a material change to the club by Taylormade?
its probably 50 degrees cooler in this video
Looking at the numbers I would say that the TM edged it.
Iv got the old p7mc s n if you don't strike them right yes they can punish you abit but for feel they are excellent and good around the greens 🏌🙂👍minus 1 and hit one thin ouch lol 😆
Which part is forged the club head or the face or is it like my Wilson staff tour blades the whole thing is one piece that's a real forged club. This should be called 'semi forged' face, head or whatever? Cannot be fully forged if it is hollow. Is that à fraudulent description? Only asking .
couple years ago when cobra used forged face and stamp forged on their f8 iron a bunch of people were mad about it. But now almost all the major manufacture are doing it now
After watching a lot of your videos PXG 0211st seemed to perform the best in Mia strikes and consistent distance and ball speed or did I miss something thank you
Those P7mc are not easy to hit. I play TCB and find them much more forgiving for the same type of iron.
私はテーラーメイドが好きです。
P7MCを買ったよ。T100はスイートスポットが狭い。
I'm not a TM Iron fan. so it would be the Titleist for me every time
Far greater variation between Taylormade & Titleist when you look at highest & lowest number in each category, wish this was highlighted more in reviews. Good to bear in mind if warmed up 1st mind as if not then the 2nd club may be hit better
T100 all day
I think you should compare apples with apples. Should have had 770 to compare
Made review irrelevant.
P770 are not comparable to the t100 there a hollow body club like the t200
I can't see a situation where I'd ever game Taylormade anything. Nothing from them ever suits my eye at address for some reason.
The black burner 2.0s did. I liked the black sole and toe with chrome face. Taught me to find the middle when I was younger.
taylormade just always seems to come up a little short of the mark , if you want a great players club go titleist or mizuno if you want a great marketing company then go with taylormade.
Taylormade, Callaway, Ping, Srizon, Titleist, Mizuno all make excellent golf equipment.
to support your channel i gave you thumb down
🤷♂️