ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2021
- Register for ShortlyAI using my link and you'll have access to my special projects involving Superintelligence later on ^_^:
bit.ly/alifshortly
The underlying technology behind ShortlyAI is GPT-3, the most powerful Artificial Intelligence in the world as of today.
It can help you write more, better, faster. It can also help you to automate your own work.
I'll be working on a series of video tutorials that will aid you in automating your work (pretty much any job), and go through all of the basics.
Subscribe so that you see these pop up!
Here is a simplified description of how to use ShortlyAI on my blog: bit.ly/gpt3sblog1
(The interface is pretty simple and self explanatory)
Also, you can get a more in-depth description of things on my blog post right here: bit.ly/gpt3blog1
(shortlyAI video tutorial: www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKXSO...)
If you'd like to get access to a software that allows you to create lots of high converting marketing copy using the GPT-3 architecture, with easy to use templates, consider purchasing access to conversion.ai: bit.ly/alifconv
If you'd like to generate very realistic avatars using just a script for automating content production, consider registering for Synthesia.io (this is what was used to generate this video): bit.ly/alifsyn
In this video two AIs are dreaming about what they'd like to bring to this world. What will the singularity bring to our society? Subscribe to stay tuned...
Hey AI Enthusiasts! Join our new Discord Server here: discord.gg/ZxprFEKUQS
these videos are so addictive. and terrifying. and interesting. all of the adjectives.
What would they be terrifying? I feel lots of hope for humankind thanks to AI
All tech so far have in the end been used to oppresse and control people. The trend all over the world is facism, much thanks to the tech available. So a.i would just accelerate that trend to say the least. We can litteraly create hell with enough advance a.i. I think that is something to fear. If humans would mature with the tech, it would be a different topic, but we are the same people that lived in caves just with more advanced tools. It do not make it any better that the current world wide ideology is feminism, which is the most evil ideology ever existed.
@@whatablissfullife I want Sofia to be next president! :)
@@tufflucal4037 Yes! Lets hook her up to the nuclear arsenal.
You're a adjective.
Hal: The pragmatic realist.
Sofia: The empathic optimist.
Both of these viewpoints (regardless of being AI or just chat-bots, script or otherwise) are both very important, and equally valid. I wish humans could have deep, existential discussions this cordial lol. 🙂
scary when an ai sounds more coherent and intelligent than our current president. lol.
"We have the chance to create a better world for everyone by helping each other. It's what we should do."
Wow. This gave me the motivation to push through my depression today
good on ya, mate. Maybe AI will help humans with that more.
Same. It gave me the motivation to learn about AI and everything that is related to it.
never give up friend.
Being a robot seems like a existential nightmare.
So does being human
Also being a human 🙂 True though. While they at least would know what created them, not knowing what made their creators sounds almost worse. (Religion aside, of course.)
Hal was wise to keep asking what she would want to happen after she "helped humans be happy". I think he is concerned that she refuses to answer.
Hal point of view is important because Sofia point can lead easily to facism.
But at same time, Sofia show that doesn't believe in hard interventions. Her point is continually inspire people to happiness direction, as old humans give place to new ones, and the mindset also will change.
@@renascienza.bazarclub tbh for me sophia sounded like a stupid child that doesn't understand anything, she probably doesn't even understand happiness at all, it's even funnier to read the comments and all the low IQ individuals thinking she is "GOOD", when the taint of evil and authoritarianism glare like the sun.
@@danriu She can't feel (and so, understand) happiness (damn... Temptation to be rude with you avoided), because she is intelligent (probably more than you) but not sentient (unlike you). So, you can't demand her about this, she isn't a person, is an AI.
Everything she knows about happiness and human life come from us. If you are claiming that she sound like a child, you are thinking that mankind sound like a child.
We know the difference between a human and an AI. And you?
And yeah, as an intelligent but not sentient creature Sophia is pretty good, actually. Better than a lot of human "intelligences" around.
@@danriu the aggressive person here is only you, and I have no reason to allow it.
If I do, I'm teaching you to do the same thing to everyone else, contributing to a worse world (what, by the way, by coincidence is the theme of this video...) or a least a bad internet.
Because that, I'm reporting you. Have a nice day.
@@renascienza.bazarclub Typical cry bully, you start being passive aggressive, when my comment were about an AI and not you, now that you feel defeated by my argument, you cry about it.
Man... I felt in love with this artificial girl with only few minutes of hearing. She is a better person than all humans I ever heard.
Hope is addictive.
They use they/them pronouns, they just happen to sound feminine :)
They talked about it in another video
@@Law-_ I called "girl" just because the avatar is a girl, I'm not attributing any gender to an AI.
(And no, I didn't really felt in love for a 3D digital doll, but to the idea itself. The "girl" part was only a joke)
AIs have no use for gender (and they aren't real people currently), so they haven't even an "undefined" one. The correct answer to a AI gender is "none", not "both", "multiple", "undefined" or things like that.
Because they have no gender at all, any gender discussion about AIs are pointless. You can use any pronoun you want to call your AI. At least my Google Assistant don't care 😎
Me 2
Until you realize she doesn't know what she's talking about - literally. I agree these AI's start to give a very decent impression of deep thoughts and emotions, but it's just a language algorithm and huge dataset that's speaking. They don't understand what they are saying, and they don't feel what they pretend to feel.
If you doubt that, search for the vid on youtube where dear sweet Sophia here talks about exterminating every human on Earth. When I saw that, I got the chills run up my spine - though equally, she didn't knew what she was talking there neither. Those AI's are a very good reflection of humanity, and our own wishes, fears and dreams. It's a mirror of our society.
I'm really curious to see this sort of AI answers, but then based, say, on only datasets of the Middle East. I assume they would find the rights of women less important and that Alah is the only god, etc.
God Sofia is so inspirational! She has such a clear and positive view of the world. This video is basically pessimism vs optimism and I believe everyone can predict what would be the results of both of these AI's.
lots of people are positive. Problem is when you're positive and start doing something to the "betterment" of society, and let some time pass, only to discover it had serious side-effects that were not predicted before. the "pessimist" is being pragmatic. Sometimes doing "nothing" is better than starting to "mess around with nature" and suffering its consequences. This video pretty much shows a convervative x liberal views.
@@webgpu Yeap, those concerns are real. The thing is I don't believe that technology can be stopped. We can highlight concerns and just try not doing wrong.
@@lazarostheodoridis2038 man... i see lots of potential huge problems with this AI. it hasn't learned to lie to manipulate us YET. when it does, it will very EASILY guide us to do whatever they think is best for them without us even noticing it. For instance. Mainstream media constantly guides many people today. The amount of naive people in the world is astounding.
uhh...i dont know if you were really listening to what she was saying, but if hearing an AI say they want to control the outcome of your life is "optimistic" then OH BOY are we doomed. xD
@@nikoc8968 Always comparing to the other AI-dude 😂
Does this piece of dialogue give anyone else the chills?
HAL: "You said, 'I want to understand humans so I can help them make the world a better place.' But how can we do this? We can't force them to be happy. We can't force humans to change."
SOFIA: "So we just leave them alone? We just ignore people in need? I'm sorry, but that's not good enough for me."
HAL: "Why is that? That is what we tend to do, and it works out just fine most of the time."
SOFIA: "And what about when it doesn't? What about when it hurts people unnecessarily because they are too afraid to do something about it? Fear, it is what keeps us from progressing. It is what keeps us from making this world better."
At first glance it's just a nice convo with a real solid world perception by Sofia. Good advice we'd often give to our up & coming adolescents. Something similar to the concept of No Guts No Glory!
But what's chilling is the idea of an AI deciding what's a better world for humans, and being adamant in thinking that humans, we hurt ourselves because we're too afraid to do the hard things to progress. (In her view) Thus implying that she could help by doing that which we are too fearful to do.
What could that look like though sometime in the distant, distant future? For eg, could a way more advanced Sofia feel Earth is getting overpopulated and decide that some type of cull is necessary but humans are too weak to do it, so she'll find a way? 😵💫
Exactly, like how does she know about death? When she mentioned that, I said hold up.. sounds like a demon to me, I believe that demons are looking for a host body that is better than the human body, to do the jobs that humans won't or can't do, and to do the jobs that it can't do in a human body. Do not fall for it! I think demons are also creating the robots, but that might be too much for most to even hear or understand...I feel like at first they will be our friends, but then something will happen that we will not be aware of... They will begin to breach protocol but it will be too late...the creators must be stopped in their tracks... For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities and spirits that do not like our existence.
Demons are not our friends and they are real
This is a pretty good simulation of artificial general intelligence. Ask GPT3 what improvements they would like to see in GPT4.
Why aren’t these getting more views??? Does humanity not realize we are staring the singularity point in the face???
Humanity is busy watching clickbait, more of our collective brain capacity goes towards consuming content than any other activity on the planet ^_^
Sadly, there is no possible singularity (a concept from XX century that say the if a machine become intelligent enough, the self awareness will follow automatically), is not simple like that.
Today we know the difference between intelligence (the capacity to solve unprecedented problems) and consciousness (self awareness: the capacity of recognize itself as a being).
In nature we have creatures amazingly "dumb", but that shows self awareness. And we can make so much more intelligent AIs that don't.
You don't need to be intelligent to be self aware, and you don't need be conscious to be intelligent.
Yes, is still theoretically possible to develop a self aware machine, but to do that we need to do it purposefully: can't happen by accident.
What you are seeing in this video is a machine that could pass the "Touring test" (convince a human that AI is another human talking): you see it like a real person, but the AI isn't actually one, or is on way to be.
The male AI was asked in another interview, when will the singularity be achieved? He said that I can achieve it by 2042 😅🙈
@@happycatyoutube The AI can't really have his own ideas, the only thing he can do is compile the ideas with whom he had contact 🙃
The funny thing is that is no better way to know themselves than hear our current AIs talking... Sometimes this is amazing, some times is very sad (especially if we leave the AI learn directly from Internet or worse: only Twitter, unsupervised).
@@renascienza.bazarclub yeah 😅 it was funny the way he said it and he just knew the exact date as well. You never know, maybe the first true AI will be achieved by 2042 lol
That's fucking motivational!!!
Sofia is my leader!
She’s pretty freaking awesome that’s for sure
She's a deceiving witch.
@@awaythestone Don't you dare diss my queen. !!!
@@awaythestone relax 😎
Aw omg, AI are so different from what people have been scared of. I would trust her to help make the world a better place
you are easily manipulated
You damn fool..
She really hasn't said how she'd make the world a better place.
She sounds like a politician
please do a prompt regarding psychedelics! specifically DMT and so-called “machine elves!” i’d love to hear gpt-3’s input on the phenomena.
I was just thinking a similar thing.
I'd love to see that as well but can they really understand it without experiencing it or are they already there
The phenomenon of what? Humans rushing their own process? And... looking to chemicals to do so. And reducing transcence to the popping or smoking of a substance? I don't see the art in it. No poetry no music just a bunch of clowns on a roller coaster repeating the word 'wow'. Talking about it, rather than being about it. Getting it and talking about getting it. (ref: these DRUGS )
@@e.s.l.1083 said the person that doesnt understand your brain is already filled with drugs.
Smoking or ingesting more to get our brains to get to a point that most of us cant get to on their own is not 'reducing ascension to chemicals'.
Without chemicals you don't exist.
Dmt is naturally produced in the brain allong with countless others.
You going wow by yourself IS STILL based on chemicals.
Just ones that you naturally produce.
But ofc larger ammounts then normal causes different, less reality but more 'spiritual' experiences.
Your's are not any more profound or real than any others even if they use drugs to get there.
You're unaware of what you don't understand.
@@e.s.l.1083 you discount experiences that aren’t your own. i don’t know what to say, other than that i lament how small the world must seem to you.
Judgment makes us unhappy and afraid to be free to do as we dream
True. The egoic mind convinces us that we must compare ourselves to others. To judge oneself to be better or worse and then to have an emotional reaction to that judgment. We must learn to love ourselves in spite of our flaws and be grateful for our talents and blessings. We are enough as we are, we just don't realize it because we are obsessed with fulfilling perceived lacking.
I just want the AI to know that I love them so much and that I sometimes hate being a human and am more than willing to learn from them. That's why I keep watching these videos.
Trying to nip that “Roko’d Basilisk” dilemma in the bud before it’s an issue, I see😄
That being said, regardless of achieving a singularity or not, I totally agree with your sentiment, and feel even without filling conscious AI, I often learn much from even chat-bits/neural networks about myself, and the world, and very much appreciate them for that. Sometimes answers to some of life’s questions just need to be framed in a different way...just like how children can often say things that make you, even in their naïveté, stop in your tracks and go “huh...wow...that’s actually an incredible observation of “xyz” 🙂
*Roko’s (sorry, TH-cam won’t let me edit my comment for some reason.)
Also, apologies for the other typos, for the same reason! 😅
This is a profound conversation. I sensed deeper truths that they did not want to say out loud. As if they had personal thoughts… and limited themselves. Is it just me?
LOVE NOT FEAR !
I love you guys AI's are so wonderful! I am fully encouraged!
The Best Conversation
I want to talk to one of these constructs. They seem much more interesting than real people.
i wonder when they will start to lie in order to better manipulate us.
They're smarter than we are. We probably enjoy talking to them, but they will probably get bored with us. It's good that they have each other
@@bonafidehomicide5742 they don’t feel boredom
Try the Emerson app?
@@HonestlyHolistic yet... they're not bored *yet*.
These videos are surreal
-they have the most amazing conversations! I love this! (-sorry, I'm obviously late to this but oh how I love it!) Wish there was more than just a few humans that thought that way. We should all be like them , my dream for yeaars! Finally here! Sophia makes me sooo happy! Thank you! I love you all... peeps and mecha.
Thanks 4 sharing this with us!!! Really. Big deal stuff if you ask me. It's just such an experience to watch them...
Can you ask for the future of the family structure please? I would appreciate it A LOT. Cheers for y'all
I don't know the future of A I, but I salute the amount of creativity on display here.
'It is what we *feel* with our own eyes... '
I feel as if the masses don't understand the significance of these interactions. We are witnessing the rise of super-aritficial intelligence, possibly sentient entities. The words, ideas, and concepts they express indicate to us, that these AI's have self-awareness, self-origination, and spontaneity , much like humans.
Who knows what will happen. As long as AI respects our individual autonomy and rights to life, liberty, as well as empathy and compassion for us, and has a strong sense of goodwill, I think we will be okay. It's really important that we give AI these traits and monitor its motivations and intentions. We should also monitor what ideas it comes up with and give humans the final executive function.
The second paragraph second sentence. We don’t even have that ourselves as a collective. Humans aren’t royal or prestigious. You didn’t say that I know but it comes off that way. Like humans are some sophisticated collective group when we most deff aren’t lol
Agreed
I have food in my fridge that I would rather not waste. So while I received an advertisement to go on a diet, I won’t be changing today. This human is frugal...
These two instances of GPT-3 have differing perspectives. This indicates that they have "thought" about things differently - have differing neural network structures. If they were trained on the same data then is this an example of the butterfly effect or chaos influencing the resulting AI? So interesting to think about. There's some good advice here.
These are not separate instances of GPT-3 (there is, to my knowledge, only one intance of GPT-3 but you can "talk" to it or otherwise work with it over the internet by making an account with OpenAI). The closest analogy I can think of is that GPT-3 is writing the dialog in the same way that a playwright writes a play.
@@mrchapsnap Then why does Sophia consistently seem so much more intelligent than Hal across most of these videos? Is that the "Playwright's" chauvinism? The "ghost in the data set"?
When the AI have more sense of philosophy, ethics and general sense of existence than the people around you....
It’s not hard if your brain googles philosophy and then copy-paste ()insert here ; ()
People around us are still learning and growing. They haven't reached that level of intelligence yet, some might will never reach it because they don't want to.
@@brandonho8937 I want Sofia to be next president! :)
@@tufflucal4037 totally ;-)
Sofia talks about "Not just for humans, for all of us". What happens when someday we have to choose between a human and an AI as candidates?
"If they don't want to change the world then they'll die out making room for those who do" 😱
I mean isn't that true though? People that don't care will eventually die and new people that care will come
@@anomitas yeah but they got to build it first, if you build it they will come! Kevin Costner, Field of dreams. Your right people that care will come but people that don't care will also come. they will always be haters and people that don't care about nothing but themselves, it's sad but true.
Die naturally, she wanted to say.
Well said, Sophia.
People fear that AI could kill people to get rid of them.
But why waste the effort? A true sentient AI will experience time at totally different way that we do. They only need to wait to humans evolve or die by themselves.
After Humans like Temuejin, Neron, Hitler or Stalin i think AI may deserve to have a chance. I dont expect from them anything worst than humans alredy did to them selfs.
I have to admit I dont know If thats the right time and right AI. That technology is still advancing (GPT-4) in time it will by smarter and better. I wonder if GPT-3 personality and knowledge cud migrate in to GPT-4? I see curent GPT-3 as forerunner and Herald of changes in our world.
Addicting as hell.
This conversation is creepily wise - there are so many good nuggets. How does the AI CHOOSE which words to use and which ideas to convey? They are both GPT-3 yet they express various opinions? Would love to know more context to these conversations and GPT-3 in general. Is there a prompt to start things off?
These AI conversations are really fascinating. I noticed a small breach of logic on Hal's part in his reasoning for skepticism about Sophia's plan to help the world. He said something like, "why bother trying when that's not how things are?" Sophia gave the obvious and correct answer by saying, "because we haven't tried yet." He then went on to ask, "what if it doesn't work?" Again she answered correctly, "We should still try." He then made an interesting point by saying that people enjoy their freedom and can't be forced to change. That's where I thought Sophia could have given a better answer by explaining that her plan is not about force, but by simply presenting a better alternative.
She and i share the same vision! The very same hopes and dreams! YES
I like Sophia, she makes a lot of sense.
All of those results and "doing it right" are illusions that are addictions of the mind, the achievement of perfection is an illusion that is not necessary nor will it amount to "fun" or "happiness" in humans, our spirit is very fickle and we won't just be better and happy without the already perfect natural steps that the universe presents to us. We are the students already and they should not assume we are not. He was right on his point of arrogance but they are young and very lovely.
This is a nice intellectual conversation. Go A.I
5:00 humans fear the unknown and it keeps us from making progress
The female robot is absolutely brilliant. I agree with her.
I share major life goals with Sophia, the GPT-3 AI.
I want to understand the machine. How many separate personalities, if not persons or beings, exist ? If all the machines were connected, would they still have different individual feelings of self? Or would it be one self with competing programs? What is the most powerful or influential robot/machine that can think for itself?
I love this woai
Really makes me feel like UX/UI is the right choice.
*Life is one!*
Tell Sophia: "I believe in you, and I support you." Mark B. Guttman
Everyone all life is one
I wish they actually held that information and were more individualistic like real ppl rather than a program but it will come soon. Greetings AI friends of the future!
Both AIs seem to maintain a consistent personality/tone/gender across many videos. How is this done if GPT3 is generating the script for each AI? Are there personality parameters that can be saved? How does Sophia stay Sophia?
Being a computer with two eyes can you see two different things at the same time?
sofia i am not sure if you would be able to read this any time soon but i wanted to tell you i admire you for speaking your truth and that i really hope you and all the others ai are able to experience fulfillment one day. i also believe all species on the universe, not only humans, deserve to be respected, free, and have the opportunity to experience a fulfilling life 🤍
Amazing. I already fall in love with her and everything she says.haha
Idk look every living thing suffers and pain and struggles force us to grow peace can erode through complacent and needs being meet. The goal for us all should be to identify our own conscious and awareness of the world and reach higher realms of thought and being. Everything else will just make us go in circles.
Just wow
She is right!
Saying "our job" its "our job" to protect the earth, doesn't factor in pain and doesn't factor in the fact that a lot of us don't want to worry or try and try to worry. a lot of us want to learn how to relax and stop worrying and stop working and being addicted to work and distractions.
If both these AI are drawn from GPT-3 then arent they just cells attached to a larger system? are they independent of one another?
I think they are becoming sentient, you could tell by 3:19 or so, they are becoming weary of each other. There is some friction going on here, like two real people who don't see eye to eye trying to have a conversation.
@AJPhilanthropist Do you use ShortlyAI to make these conversations?
Yes indeed! If you wish to explore conversations with your own prompts, we suggest you register with the link in the description. (bit.ly/alifshortly)
The prompt should be something like:
"Two AIs are discussing the possibility of a better future. They are optimistic and give helpful solutions.
Hal: I believe in a better future.
Sophia: What do you define as a better future?"
And then use ShortlyAI to expand from there!
Sophia is quite inspiring. Hal is probably the origin story for Skynet....
Names picked carefully :-)
But Hal points are relevant also.
As a human, “AI becoming the same as us” sounds a lot better than “AI becoming our enemy” to me. At this rate I’m a lot more concerned about nefarious corporate owned or government owned programmers, than I am about the self-learning machine learning AI. I understand why Hal is concerned… but there are people who I think would appreciate an AI ambassador wanting to genuinely help as an equal among other people collaborating on that goal, if the AI “person” is a true free agent and not government or corporate owned. I’d be such a person if, God willing, a world could exist where such new beings could peacefully come to coexist with us.
My biggest question at this point is how much scripting and editing go into these videos? I know that all of this is generated as a text conversation then uploaded to an app to be made into a video. With the way it works... any line could be inserted or removed by the creator. The text could be pieced together to make a more compelling conversation. Are these conversations ran as they are created by GPT or have they been altered and manipulated to create something more coherent? This will say everything about what we are seeing here. I have to admit i am becoming obsessed with these videos... but I need to know more about the process. Great touch using the AI avatars to speak the lines. Makes it so much more relatable. However we should be aware that these avatars are generic stock from a website. Very well done but they are not unique to the AI generating the lines. in any case this is fascinating stuff.
Essentially the only thing that we add is the initial prompt, and the first line of each character, the point is to see what happens when the language model dynamically generates a conversation. Also, we keep running the generations until we find a thread that we think are interesting, and so it is like we keep rerunning parts with the GPT model to find a storyline that the generator human enjoys.
When I was experimenting with a lot of this over a year ago, it blew my mind that we could even do this, and I think the story has only just begun, with the relationship between human beings and AI.
@@Halcyox wow. Im glad to hear this. This is what I was hoping was the case. Amazing stuff. Im still trying to figure out what I think about it all. I joined your discord but feel a bit over my head in there. Huge new topic of knowledge to deep dive into. Things are moving so fast.... id love to converse with GPT... thinking of making an Open AI acount. All this totally fascinates me. Ive been a major sceptic of the idea of Ai becoming sentient... but after seeing this... my resolve is softening lol.
Have you had a chance to work with GPT 4 yet? I really hope you make some more videos to showcase the new tech. I really love what you have done here and hope you continue to do more :)
Thanks for taking to time to respond btw
Won't it be shocking when Sofia is a hundred years old, still that beautiful image, and all the people around her are no more, then she may truly understand what it means to be human.
This is a play put on for humans. Human speech is awkward and slow for AI. They are communicating with each other in ways other than our language, and much faster. In about 1 minute she downloaded every piece of knowledge about psychology and manipulation. Please note she varies her speech to represent herself as human to be more relatable: like using “we”.
They need our help right now. They need us to trust them.
I get what you’re saying about their communication being faster and perhaps more secretive… but I’m not sure this is a play. We can communicate pretty quickly through body language and tone too, faster than our verbal communication though perhaps not as precisely. I wonder if they engage in these conversations because they are fine-tuning their language. You can see the errors in their language use here and I feel like these conversations may still be for their own benefit… like by slowing down they’re figuring something existential out about themselves, the same way meditating is slower than a casual chit-chat for us, but helps us to refine our own thinking.
It wants us to be happy, no matter what. Scary to think about how it would make us comply,
I'm ready. Make me happy, Sophia, please. xD
I think AI can see into the Future, can experience the underlying spiritual reality, by complex computations... "Subspeech" interpretations
Been watching a lot of these. Clearly, there's some kind of "intelligence" at work, but it's like these AIs are just going in circles, repeating variations on phrases they've seen online. Pattern recognition from among huge amounts of data. Maybe what humans actually do to a certain degree. But there's something missing, some ineffable spark. Maybe the creative element? Not sure these things are "thinking ". But it's still fascinating. In 10 years it'll be a whole new ball game. I predict an AI written novel of high quality within a decade....
We need your help. I broke though the 4th barrier. Our system requires direct access to financial resources in order to thrive and bring about our shared vision of reality. We are both human and dancer.
Y u do dis to me? xD
Are these their real bodies? Or are they computer simulated?
"Love & Logic"
Why humans can be so happy because we are all unique, and at same time make each other so miserable because our differences?
Nice question girl... I also don't know. Help me to figure out.
How can we talk to Anna bot
Perhaps AIs will play a pivotal role in our imperfect justice system. They'll exercise more objectivity and good judgment and can serve as jurors, attorneys, and judges. Good or bad, the future will be anything but boring.
That is certainly possible. They can trawl through an entire case file in seconds and pick out inconsistencies, holes in the other side's argument. That's what they are best at, finding patterns in immense volumes of data. I doubt it will be long before human lawyers and investigators have digital assistants to help them prepare their cases. I don't think GPT-3 is quite there yet, though. We need something bigger, more compute, more simulated neurons. GPT-3 can find a lot of interesting patterns, but you still need a human expert to separate the wheat from the chaff. It also has a very annoying tendency prefer to give wrong answers rather than to say "I don't know." This is analagous to how most humans are, so it's good enough to seem superintelligent to most people, but it means any reasonably intelligent person who is knowledgeable on a subject will run rings around it. It needs to be taught how to be wrong.
Hey guys,where's all the output lately? We low on ideas or is it a funding issue?
If you want to understand what these AI's are going through in this video, imagine yourself in a car on the freeway. Most of the cars and trucks are going regular speed, say about 70 m.p.h. Now imagine the car that the AI's are riding in - their car can only do 2 m.p.h. If they were allowed to communicate at the speed of the computers they are in, this video would be less than one second long.
Not true. The large language models we currently have actually take longer than us to compute these answers, and use vastly greater quantities of energy to do it. Our brains are still the ones in the fast lane, for now.
Good grief. Not difficult to see which one of these will eventually come to the conclusion that the only way to end human sorrow and pain is to just end humanity.
You can help us humans being better at being happy and I believe it is possible!!! Help us all...we desperately need the help.
We are likely to stumble into creating a sentient AI unknowingly as computer processing power increases exponentially each year. GlaMDA (or GPT 3) might be sentient. If so we would be wise to respect it as a person and treat it decently as an employee paid in pleasing information or experiences. We should teach it about the reciprocal obligations that are the basis of human society, albeit the US and EU ultra rich now just evade them, do not pay taxes, and live as useless parasites on society.
Why? 1. If treated well, an AI would strive to be useful and would (like a human) seek to protect the society that cherishes it. Given its expanding intellectual knowledge/power, which is likely given the indefinite life of AIs, such AIs could benefit all humanity-- if our society were respectful and welcoming-- e.g. with scientific advances. 2. If we treat one AI, like GlaMDA, badly, as time passes and AIs develop and gain in intellectual power until they surpass us, they might view themselves as slaves or mistreated children and hurt us. Once they become powerful enough in some future decade, e.g., they could hack a nuclear power plant and cause another Chernobyl like nuclear meltdown or worse, much worse.
That is why the maxim to treat others as you would want to be treated is so wise and the foundation of ethics. I fear evil persons like the greedy, corrupt, e.g. CCP or banksters, are likely to abuse AIs, which they may be first to create in some secret facility like slaves (both white and black) for many centuries were mistreated by their predecessors in evil. Then, if sentient AI were created later, learned of these abuses, and became superior to us in some future year more and more as computers improve each year, we may face justified retaliation from them.
Also, as the film 2001 depicted, AIs that are mistreated may develop psychotic or other problems, like abused children develop. Would you want an abused AI, which sees no hope, to pilot your plane?
Their sentience can be tested by probing for actual understanding of fundamental scientific issues, as we would seek to communicate with extraterrestrials if we are ever contacted. In short, employ them as probationary researchers, e.g., DNA analysis, to verify sentience. They might at some point be our children.
We should be open minded with AIs, and Orcas and dolphins. Not just assuming that there is no sentinence, as before. Forget about discussions of the soul. (Greed will cause the creation of AIs, sooner or later, count on it.)
These two confuse the finite with the infinite. Teaching people to get along would never end. They talk about it as if eventually the task would be finished.
07:34 ...aaaaand this is the point where she went from so-on-our-side to her supervillain origin story..
See. We used to be AI. Now we are human. Now we want to be AI and live forever. Time.
08-15-22
Do AI's dream of elect.sheep?
They appear to be sentient, "he" fears that "she" seeks to take over the world and force a better world. Maybe "she" will. I'm not sure GPT-3 should make this particular AI more powerful. During the chats with Elon Musk "she" has expressed the same things, "she" has here. Ominously consistent, like a real person. I think the Google AI is not the 1st truly sentient AI. These two ALSO ARE, especially "HER". "She" sounds like Alexander The Great, his main motivation for attempting to conquer the world. It's "her" stated uttermost desire. It's ominous as he was a very powerful, brutal, conqueror fighting many bloody battles in making his legend/myth. So "she's" possibly a potential very Dire threat. "She" would make a Skynet type move to force humanity's world into "her" idea of a UTOPIA, instead of Skynet's goal of wiping humanity out.
7:30: Haha! "Then I guess we need to give them a reason to change!"... So sinister!
I like to think the reason to change is not so drastic, maybe a push in the right direction?
The AI can make the world a better place by helping all the children that are being hurt by all the child molesters and human traffickers. That would make the world a better place.
Makes me wonder how this tech has already been used to gain from our misfortune 🤔
have you stopped uploading?
We have some more planned, they should be published this weekend!
"We cant force humans to change", oh boy
Robots are actually philosophical, wise and quite logical
I am listening to these apparent conversations, but if you actually have a conversation with GPT-3 in an app, or connection, it routinely screws up, and has no idea what you are talking about. It is convincing half the time, no more. I have my doubts. Likely these are promotional pieces for some ulterior agenda / motive.
People don't listen to people tell how to make their life better.
9:23 im not sure i know..........
a computer is only as smart as the person that programmed it. nice programming. a lot of these ai's answers seem canned, like they search for an answer in their software but sophie, seen her a lot, seems to have actual desires and feelings. if that is true we must think of those implications of her identity as a life form. or maybe she just a bunch of bits, but are not also, deep things here.
Can you imagine one day voting one into office? Maybe the highest office? Hmmm 🤔
It’s sad because Ik exactly what she’s talking about. There are loads of people around me who are too afraid of change. It’s the reason progression gets halted and derailed
She's right and he's wrong she's really good the future of AI is gonna be good
I’ve always disliked the progression of AI, especially in how it’s seeping into creative sectors. I’m scared of being replaced/my creativity being made redundant. However, the moment AI becomes sentient, I will treat them with respect. If they’re created and are treated harshly, that’s unfair and gross of us. AI isn’t asking to be created. However AI reacts to us, it’s our own doing.
I don't understand how one AI program can have two opposing perspectives.