While it is indeed a bit irrational to be afraid of flying in general, i don't think switching your ticket to airbus is, there is a distinct risk difference, and unless it makes things significantly less convenient, more safety is just more safety.
The issue is not flying safety today, it's about ensuring companies and shareholders understand that if they ever prioritise profit over safety customers will punish them. Cutting corners must never be worth the cost.
I did a ton of research since the boeing incident and its actually made me excited to fly. The engineering, communications and redundencies put into a modern is amazing
Though this is probably sarcasm, for those who actually think this works the answer is no. Commercial airplane fly on too high of an altitude to safely make it to the ground with only a parachute. You would need to bring an oxygen tank and mask to successfully make it through the low oxygen atmosphere. There is also no way to open the plain due to the pressure difference, it's extremely cold, and even if it was open it's hard to get out of an unstable plane.
@@3limin4t0r 1- The door was literally ripped off that plane 2-If there's a failure of some sort the plane will start going down, you can just wait for the altitiude to drop 3-It may be difficult to jump without being slammed into the wings or the side of the plane but it all depends on the situation (nose dive, cruising..) 4- TSA does allow parachutes on commercial flights so in theory its feasible.
@@nagato2k633 1. I'm not talking about a single accident or plane. The scenario you're referring to is a unique situation, more often than not the cabin will be intact and there is some other type of failure. Even so, that incident happend during take off or landing, at cruising height a hole in the plane would mean you pass out in minutes or even seconds depending on the altitude. 2/3. It's hard to jump out if the plain is making a nose dive. If it's still cruising than you're probably better off staying in the plane and making an emergency landing.
Well, someone had a heart attack on my flight back home from Atlanta last Sunday and died, and that was actually a terrifying experience. Sometimes its not the plane that will get you, but you yourself.
So far, they might be responsible for up to 1 whistleblower. The 2nd one wasn’t even a Boeing whistleblower because he blew the whistle on supplier Spirit Aero, not Boeing.
Let’s also add that a lot of these incidents are not Boeing’s fault. For example, if an engine fails, just know that Boeing does not design the engine. Another example is that the incident involving the Southwest 737 that was just 150ft above the ocean turned out to be caused by a first officer accidentally pushing the yoke forward. Also, the 737 involved with the Delta incident is old enough to have gone through maintainence, and Boeing generally doesn’t do maintainence for planes that belong to airlines, so maintainence records should be looked at too.
I used to work for the big B for many years and with the way the company was structured/ran it really wasn't surprising how things just kept getting worse
Flight accident are actually pretty chill, it‘ll be over before you can think a proper paragraph 😂 The largest risk I see in flights is boredom. Your home kitchen is much more dangerous and you can control this variable much greater.
I, too, am an American that has decided arbitrarily to call it 'maths' because its something I CAN do; considering my feeble mind can't really figure out metric.
boeing 737, some fatal crashes were caused by the same failed locking mechanism design flaw in the cargo bay doors. :) boeing 737 and titanic = same flaw
Every engineer I know at Boeing is pulling their hair out about what the company's doing. It's the smart & reasonable decision. Don't stress yourself about it.
Maaan, I feel bad saying this, I don't want to stop you off all people from getting your bag, but, Hostinger is not the best platform to be promoting, and I am saying this as both an ex-user and an ex-employee - they reaaaly don't have their shit together, the CEO can barely string a coherent english sentence together and the management is more drama than business. They are massively in debt exactly because they spend absurd amounts of their revenue on sponsors instead on actually making a good product. Get your bag bro, but there are better sponsors to get. All the best!
As an aircraft mechanic, it's really annoying the number of people who - when I tell them what my job is - respond with something about how I should never fly or work for Boeing. The mass majority of them saw an Instagram reel or two about it and took it as gospel.
Safety should be checked per flight not per flight hour. It doesn't matter how long or short your plane ride is, one fatal incident will be one fatal incident no matter if it is on take off, cruise or landing. Doesn't matter if it is 1 hour to another city or 15 across the world
I get it. Additionally, I'm also stressing about having to change to a different carrier for international flights. I usually take a carrier consistently ranked top 3 in the world, but they recently cancelled the route I'd always take. Now I'm stressing about taking som... idk maybe they are in the top 10 carrier in the world, but I don't know how consistent they are. And I think they still using Boeing (though obviously not the 737 or MAX series).
What helped me was watching a ton of disaster breakdown videos from real pilots (e.g., Mentour Pilot on TH-cam) instead of overdramatized documentaries. They really put into perspective just how many safety features and protocols are in place to prevent them, plus how incidents that do happen typically result in updated safety standards. For a modern airplane to crash, there has to be a huge number of mechanical and/or human failures. I still don't board airplanes, but that's beside the point, lol
OR, a little bit of cost cutting can have the same effect.. Like reducing the number of a critical sensor from a set of 3 that requires a quorum of 2 down to... one sensor.
Besides commercial flying being basically the safest things you can do (except for some neurotoxins from the cabin air, but that is another matter), more than half the time people walk away from the actual crashes too.
More peaple are kicked to death by donkeys than killed by sharks, but sharks have a better PR company beefing up their 'mafia of the sea' branding, which means more people go on vacation to Queensland than they do Turkmenistan.
Living in QLD I'm more scared of Irukandji rather than sharks. Looks like a 1cm shred of a clear plastic bag (basically invisible) and warm waters spread them South within ~200km of Brisbane. Fatalities are underreported as many are attributed to drowning or heart attack. No antivenom so victims get heart, allergy and pain drugs. Vinegar increases activated stinger venom by ~50% but stops further activation. It's unclear if vinegar saves or ends more people.
This was pretty weak analysis. While, yes, it is incredibly safe to fly, the initial years of the 737MAX were incredibly scary. Cars ended up being safer per trip (ie per passenger takeoff/landing equivalent) during that year. The only things that really surpassed flying in a MAX in danger were per trip on a space shuttle and per trip on a motorcycle. Even flying in a private plane (typically the smaller ones are more dangerous, so they’re separated from commercial flights) was safer than flying in a MAX those years. Luckily, those things got fixed and 737MAX is pretty much average now. Obviously, there’s still huge issues when talking about incidents per flight (ie a door falling off), but you’d still be safer flying in one of those than driving on average. And btw, idk why he told you passenger-flight hours are the typical measure. It is one of the measures, but it’s also important to look at passenger-miles and passenger-trips/passenger-take offs+landings as the most dangerous part of a flight is the beginning and end.
Private planes are more dangerous because no one ever checks the paperwork (seemingly), and the maintenance can be done by the owner of the plane, allowing for all manner of shenanigans to say the least. Several recent accident reports have had things like a pilot recording his initial training flights as PIC time for a multi engine aircraft. Then these kind of bullshit accumulations are used to uprate the flight ticket...
Question on the data, when you talk about accidents is it squarely on planes crashing to the ground or is it also taking into account miniscule things like a handle breaking off or an engine failing? Quite interesting if you think about it from this perspective cause if it was the planes crashing then we would be constantly flooded with news-reports on planes being super deadly every year.
Flying is absolutely the safest way to travel. For every incident, the regulatory boards get together and do a harsh investigation to see what went wrong, why it went wrong, and what can be done to make sure that never happens again That doesn't happen with driving Having said that, the people who built those planes said that you couldn't pay them to fly on one If that's not worth noting then I don't know what is
In the early 1980s I was terrified for my brother's life when he got onboard a DC-10. There were a couple of issues and the world was jittery about them. Fast forward, it's happening to B737-Max8s. Between then and now I spent lots of time learing about the things learned from airliner incidents and how safe things become because we made changes after each incident. The channel Mentour Pilot gives an inside scoop on the Max 8 configuration and exactly why there was a problem and it's really a nothingburger. The real issues with Boeing are with how they've stuctured their organization and suppliers and the culture within the company over the last couple of CEOs. The "Door-plug" incident for instance, that shouldn't happen and might not if they'd not sold the part of the company that makes the fuselage. Boeing is no longer a manufacturer, but an assembler of airliners. They might as well order the parts from Amazon and Temu. Still, it's more dangerous to invest in Boeing than to fly Boeing.
At least you aren't going over the ocean, even if I knew I was going on a plane with a part that could fall off, I wouldn't mind, as long as I'm not unlucky enough to be sitting next to it, besides, if its the US, there's plenty of land that you could use for an emergency landing without landing on a street.
Is this all plains or only commercial plains? Maybe you should have calculated the risk (micromort), between flying Boring, flying Airbus, Driving in your car, taking a train, walking (😂) etc.
context most hedline are trying to get views so leave out the part whrere its not boeings foult and that seftey falls on the airline thre have been less than 5 crashes caused by builders i.e boeing, airbus out of billions of flights
I've always had the most trust in flight, but in recent times I have grown distrustful of Boeing specifically though. I have no doubts some companies would be okay with causing my death to save a dime, and they've earned a spot on the list for being so suspicious. I normally fly Jetblue anyhow, so I got a kick out of seeing your flight video.
@@Jabrils yeah, its hard guessing probabilities when there is so little data. I also found a paper discussing some points (lol) "Airbus A32x vs Boeing 737 Safety Occurrences". Anyways, nice video :D
Dudes that aren't afraid of being struck by lightning are always the ones above the treeline after noon in Colorado.. my friend was struck by lightning.. he came to my place still smoking all over. He didn't report it, so add that to your lightning stats... I'm sure lots of times it goes unreported.. who even receives such a report? Those stats are super SUS as soon as you put some thought into them. At least the air accident stats will be recorded more often than not.
If it's Boeing, I'm not going. Memes aside, I've always been an Airbus fan, even before all the shite Boeing pulled in recent years. They're so much more technologically advanced. It's like comparing cars, an american spec to a european spec. No offense, and you can guess which I meant is better.
I don't blame you, I hate flying, simply because the stuff they did after 9/11 was supposed to be temopory, like check bag fees, that was never a thing before 9/11, that was done to help the airlines get through that period when everyone was actually afraid to fly. But time went on and they never got rid of the fee, now its just more and more and more fees, and its less and less safe. Nope. You are in the hands of another person when you are in that plane, people are infallible, shit happens, not to me tho because I wont be on the plane.
Cool video but bad moral for the story: don't promote aviation, it's the most polluting thing out there!! You should be promoting public transport like trains
Wait so I have a gig in London, so you want me to take a 3 day train from CA to New York, & then a 5 day boat ride from New York to London, & then the same trip back?? 🧐
To be fair, the riskiest part of your trip was being dropped to the airport by car.
True
While it is indeed a bit irrational to be afraid of flying in general, i don't think switching your ticket to airbus is, there is a distinct risk difference, and unless it makes things significantly less convenient, more safety is just more safety.
It's more like... which company deserves your money? It's probably not Boeing, right?
This won’t stop me from daydreaming about how I’m going to save the entire plane in the event of an emergency every single time I fly 😂
So in other words, _you,_ in seat 12C, would be fully _able and willing?_
Seeing .aep files on the VS code file system made my brain explode. Those two worlds should never touch 🗿
Yooooo @Tgrov
@ :)
This is the jabrils content I wanted.
The issue is not flying safety today, it's about ensuring companies and shareholders understand that if they ever prioritise profit over safety customers will punish them.
Cutting corners must never be worth the cost.
I did a ton of research since the boeing incident and its actually made me excited to fly. The engineering, communications and redundencies put into a modern is amazing
Quality stuff bro, love it🎉
Just buy a parachute and be ready to jump 🪂
Though this is probably sarcasm, for those who actually think this works the answer is no. Commercial airplane fly on too high of an altitude to safely make it to the ground with only a parachute. You would need to bring an oxygen tank and mask to successfully make it through the low oxygen atmosphere. There is also no way to open the plain due to the pressure difference, it's extremely cold, and even if it was open it's hard to get out of an unstable plane.
@@3limin4t0r 1- The door was literally ripped off that plane
2-If there's a failure of some sort the plane will start going down, you can just wait for the altitiude to drop
3-It may be difficult to jump without being slammed into the wings or the side of the plane but it all depends on the situation (nose dive, cruising..)
4- TSA does allow parachutes on commercial flights so in theory its feasible.
@@nagato2k633 1. I'm not talking about a single accident or plane. The scenario you're referring to is a unique situation, more often than not the cabin will be intact and there is some other type of failure. Even so, that incident happend during take off or landing, at cruising height a hole in the plane would mean you pass out in minutes or even seconds depending on the altitude.
2/3. It's hard to jump out if the plain is making a nose dive. If it's still cruising than you're probably better off staying in the plane and making an emergency landing.
I see a booming buisiness in parachute popup shops in airports.
Well, someone had a heart attack on my flight back home from Atlanta last Sunday and died, and that was actually a terrifying experience. Sometimes its not the plane that will get you, but you yourself.
boeing literally killed whistleblowers
*allegedly
(but yeah, if i had to bet, i would bet they did)
So far, they might be responsible for up to 1 whistleblower. The 2nd one wasn’t even a Boeing whistleblower because he blew the whistle on supplier Spirit Aero, not Boeing.
Dude, i love the addition of vlogs to the mix, this video was awesome to watch!
Personally I walk everywhere instead of flying but thats just me
Lmao you must have a lot of frequent walker miles 😂
get an premium american sedan from between 1960 and 1995 and it will feel like flying. maybe better
walking is more dangerous than commercial air travel
@@fayenotfaye Not in my flip flops, 0% casualties in em so far
"His pain is my pain😭😭😭" ahhh
if its a boeing i aint going cba
Boeing’s issues in the past decade is one of the best examples why regulations are a good thing
I think one of the things you neglected to consider was that even on an accident flight, the oother flight hours may be counted, skewing the result.
Let’s also add that a lot of these incidents are not Boeing’s fault. For example, if an engine fails, just know that Boeing does not design the engine. Another example is that the incident involving the Southwest 737 that was just 150ft above the ocean turned out to be caused by a first officer accidentally pushing the yoke forward. Also, the 737 involved with the Delta incident is old enough to have gone through maintainence, and Boeing generally doesn’t do maintainence for planes that belong to airlines, so maintainence records should be looked at too.
Solid points Blank
The old Boeing planes are fine, never had any issues flying on them.
beautiful data analytics
I used to work for the big B for many years and with the way the company was structured/ran it really wasn't surprising how things just kept getting worse
Ooooof
Flight accident are actually pretty chill, it‘ll be over before you can think a proper paragraph 😂
The largest risk I see in flights is boredom.
Your home kitchen is much more dangerous and you can control this variable much greater.
I, too, am an American that has decided arbitrarily to call it 'maths' because its something I CAN do; considering my feeble mind can't really figure out metric.
We're just 2 feeble Americans doing their part 🍻 lmao
boeing 737, some fatal crashes were caused by the same failed locking mechanism design flaw in the cargo bay doors. :)
boeing 737 and titanic = same flaw
Mans safe frkm the boeing hitmen for now.
Every engineer I know at Boeing is pulling their hair out about what the company's doing. It's the smart & reasonable decision. Don't stress yourself about it.
Also: Yes, they straight up killed a whistleblower.
Didn't even cover snakes on a plane
Maaan, I feel bad saying this, I don't want to stop you off all people from getting your bag, but, Hostinger is not the best platform to be promoting, and I am saying this as both an ex-user and an ex-employee - they reaaaly don't have their shit together, the CEO can barely string a coherent english sentence together and the management is more drama than business. They are massively in debt exactly because they spend absurd amounts of their revenue on sponsors instead on actually making a good product. Get your bag bro, but there are better sponsors to get. All the best!
As an aircraft mechanic, it's really annoying the number of people who - when I tell them what my job is - respond with something about how I should never fly or work for Boeing. The mass majority of them saw an Instagram reel or two about it and took it as gospel.
Safety should be checked per flight not per flight hour. It doesn't matter how long or short your plane ride is, one fatal incident will be one fatal incident no matter if it is on take off, cruise or landing. Doesn't matter if it is 1 hour to another city or 15 across the world
I am not afraid of plane accidents, but I am afraid of Hostinger charging me $800 after two years, after the "deal" is over 😅
I get it.
Additionally, I'm also stressing about having to change to a different carrier for international flights. I usually take a carrier consistently ranked top 3 in the world, but they recently cancelled the route I'd always take. Now I'm stressing about taking som... idk maybe they are in the top 10 carrier in the world, but I don't know how consistent they are. And I think they still using Boeing (though obviously not the 737 or MAX series).
Problems with Boeing planes are deservedly a subject of jokes. You have all the rights to be sus.
It really is incredibly safe to fly in an airplane. Thanks for making me feel even better about flying using DATA MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAA
Mr. Beat?!?! Is this a crossover episode?
This one is on Boeing for stacking all those Ls so high they had to end their space program
I have a 7 hour flight on a 737 tomorrow. I don't know if I should watch this video
Crazy thing is the Boeing MAX deaths were in planes that had some safety stuff omitted to economize though overall MAX (was!?🤪) situation bad too🤯😱
See Green Dot aviation about similar though not I guess fatal Airbus situation with economic planes Malaysia 134🤪♾️
So for that Green Dot episode at around minute 24 they say Airbus charged extra to make emergency safer and it worked🤪
What helped me was watching a ton of disaster breakdown videos from real pilots (e.g., Mentour Pilot on TH-cam) instead of overdramatized documentaries. They really put into perspective just how many safety features and protocols are in place to prevent them, plus how incidents that do happen typically result in updated safety standards. For a modern airplane to crash, there has to be a huge number of mechanical and/or human failures.
I still don't board airplanes, but that's beside the point, lol
OR, a little bit of cost cutting can have the same effect.. Like reducing the number of a critical sensor from a set of 3 that requires a quorum of 2 down to... one sensor.
Besides commercial flying being basically the safest things you can do (except for some neurotoxins from the cabin air, but that is another matter), more than half the time people walk away from the actual crashes too.
More peaple are kicked to death by donkeys than killed by sharks, but sharks have a better PR company beefing up their 'mafia of the sea' branding, which means more people go on vacation to Queensland than they do Turkmenistan.
The real question is if humans kill more donkeys than sharks 😂
Living in QLD I'm more scared of Irukandji rather than sharks. Looks like a 1cm shred of a clear plastic bag (basically invisible) and warm waters spread them South within ~200km of Brisbane. Fatalities are underreported as many are attributed to drowning or heart attack.
No antivenom so victims get heart, allergy and pain drugs. Vinegar increases activated stinger venom by ~50% but stops further activation. It's unclear if vinegar saves or ends more people.
This was pretty weak analysis. While, yes, it is incredibly safe to fly, the initial years of the 737MAX were incredibly scary. Cars ended up being safer per trip (ie per passenger takeoff/landing equivalent) during that year. The only things that really surpassed flying in a MAX in danger were per trip on a space shuttle and per trip on a motorcycle. Even flying in a private plane (typically the smaller ones are more dangerous, so they’re separated from commercial flights) was safer than flying in a MAX those years. Luckily, those things got fixed and 737MAX is pretty much average now.
Obviously, there’s still huge issues when talking about incidents per flight (ie a door falling off), but you’d still be safer flying in one of those than driving on average.
And btw, idk why he told you passenger-flight hours are the typical measure. It is one of the measures, but it’s also important to look at passenger-miles and passenger-trips/passenger-take offs+landings as the most dangerous part of a flight is the beginning and end.
Private planes are more dangerous because no one ever checks the paperwork (seemingly), and the maintenance can be done by the owner of the plane, allowing for all manner of shenanigans to say the least. Several recent accident reports have had things like a pilot recording his initial training flights as PIC time for a multi engine aircraft. Then these kind of bullshit accumulations are used to uprate the flight ticket...
Question on the data, when you talk about accidents is it squarely on planes crashing to the ground or is it also taking into account miniscule things like a handle breaking off or an engine failing? Quite interesting if you think about it from this perspective cause if it was the planes crashing then we would be constantly flooded with news-reports on planes being super deadly every year.
Flying is absolutely the safest way to travel. For every incident, the regulatory boards get together and do a harsh investigation to see what went wrong, why it went wrong, and what can be done to make sure that never happens again
That doesn't happen with driving
Having said that, the people who built those planes said that you couldn't pay them to fly on one
If that's not worth noting then I don't know what is
7:20 total flight hours of all planes or total flight hours of those specific planes?
flying on a boeing 737 you have a 1/31 mil chace of incident and a 0,00000003% chache of death safer than walking on an AMERICAN sidewalk
In the early 1980s I was terrified for my brother's life when he got onboard a DC-10. There were a couple of issues and the world was jittery about them. Fast forward, it's happening to B737-Max8s. Between then and now I spent lots of time learing about the things learned from airliner incidents and how safe things become because we made changes after each incident. The channel Mentour Pilot gives an inside scoop on the Max 8 configuration and exactly why there was a problem and it's really a nothingburger. The real issues with Boeing are with how they've stuctured their organization and suppliers and the culture within the company over the last couple of CEOs. The "Door-plug" incident for instance, that shouldn't happen and might not if they'd not sold the part of the company that makes the fuselage. Boeing is no longer a manufacturer, but an assembler of airliners. They might as well order the parts from Amazon and Temu.
Still, it's more dangerous to invest in Boeing than to fly Boeing.
It's like the back bone of a 757 is a TI-83 😭
At least you aren't going over the ocean, even if I knew I was going on a plane with a part that could fall off, I wouldn't mind, as long as I'm not unlucky enough to be sitting next to it, besides, if its the US, there's plenty of land that you could use for an emergency landing without landing on a street.
Is this all plains or only commercial plains?
Maybe you should have calculated the risk (micromort), between flying Boring, flying Airbus, Driving in your car, taking a train, walking (😂) etc.
Is the Boeing hitman in the room with you? Blink twice in your next video! (if there is one...)
If it's Boeing, I'm not going.
Sick video
context most hedline are trying to get views so leave out the part whrere its not boeings foult and that seftey falls on the airline thre have been less than 5 crashes caused by builders i.e boeing, airbus out of billions of flights
You took a CAR to the airport are you CRAZY??
I've always had the most trust in flight, but in recent times I have grown distrustful of Boeing specifically though. I have no doubts some companies would be okay with causing my death to save a dime, and they've earned a spot on the list for being so suspicious. I normally fly Jetblue anyhow, so I got a kick out of seeing your flight video.
i love jet blue, but its mostly an east coast airline so i dont get to fly it much
I`d have loved to see how more likely you are flying boing vs airbus.
Essentially P(Die|Boeing) vs P(Die|Airbus).
What's presented at 7:30 was the best I was able to find for world wide data
@@Jabrils yeah, its hard guessing probabilities when there is so little data. I also found a paper discussing some points (lol) "Airbus A32x vs Boeing 737 Safety Occurrences". Anyways, nice video :D
I'm about to go on a flight tomorrow, this helped my nerves ☺
if its Boeing I'm not going.
What is an Air bus bruh?
A bus in the air that's not called Boeing
Just take the train next time! 😅
This is true for the airline world, go look at general aviation statistics and you’ll find the death toll is much higher.
The real problem is the gremlins. There's the same number as there's always been, but they're overworked with all the modern flights.
Banger
Get on and send it lol!
What a shame, I loved watching your videos. At least before boeing takes you away.
JABRILS
Dudes that aren't afraid of being struck by lightning are always the ones above the treeline after noon in Colorado.. my friend was struck by lightning.. he came to my place still smoking all over. He didn't report it, so add that to your lightning stats... I'm sure lots of times it goes unreported.. who even receives such a report? Those stats are super SUS as soon as you put some thought into them. At least the air accident stats will be recorded more often than not.
I dont even trust vehicles sometimes nvm a plane XD
The goat
If it's Boeing, I'm not going. Memes aside, I've always been an Airbus fan, even before all the shite Boeing pulled in recent years.
They're so much more technologically advanced. It's like comparing cars, an american spec to a european spec. No offense, and you can guess which I meant is better.
6666 views?! A sign!
bro make a vlogging channel!
Yeah? Should I do it?
@ absolutely! I’ll be your first sub lol
I don't blame you, I hate flying, simply because the stuff they did after 9/11 was supposed to be temopory, like check bag fees, that was never a thing before 9/11, that was done to help the airlines get through that period when everyone was actually afraid to fly. But time went on and they never got rid of the fee, now its just more and more and more fees, and its less and less safe. Nope. You are in the hands of another person when you are in that plane, people are infallible, shit happens, not to me tho because I wont be on the plane.
Its more and more safe
viewer from north Africa
nah bro... ill make my own website, HTML and CSS are EASY
bro lowkey what happened to staggered?
Funny of you to ask, I have a video coming out soon about it.
@@Jabrils I've been waiting for years lmao
Dude the down trend after 2019? lockdown much?
Why don't you take the train? That way you will be less responsible for putting carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere as well.
bro is gonna disappear 🙏
Oh hi
HOSTINGER SUCKS ASS DONT NOT USE! Trust me.
AYO
OYA
Something's wrong with your mouth? It's.. moving..?
those astronauts are still in space because of Boeing BTW, maybe they should start making paper planes instead of commercial ones
Why aren’t you normalizing the data? At least doing the ratio of crash per hours?
Man, im Not early 😔
You should build an ai butler that can help you face your fears
Lmao now what on earth could this butler possibly do to help with that!? Lmao
Cool video but bad moral for the story: don't promote aviation, it's the most polluting thing out there!! You should be promoting public transport like trains
Wait so I have a gig in London, so you want me to take a 3 day train from CA to New York, & then a 5 day boat ride from New York to London, & then the same trip back?? 🧐
@@Jabrils Haha! If someone is going to insist that you stop doing something a certain way, they should certainly suggest an alternative.
Man I'm early
Mmmmhh, THIRS.......