KEVIN WILLIAMSON's ORIGINAL SCREAM 3 REVEALED | ORIGINAL SCRIPT DISCOVERED!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
- Are the rumours regarding Scream 3's original plan real? What was Kevin Williamson's plan for the movie? I managed to get ALL THE DETAILS about the 3rd movie script by Williamson and in this video, I run through EVERYTHING that was supposed to happen & discuss Stu Macher's role.
Thank you very much for watching this video. Don't forget to hit SUBSCRIBE and make sure you LIKE the video as that helps this channel out a lot.
LINK TREE: link.snipfeed....
Montages created by: KYLE MILLER & Alex O'Shea (Check out their channels)
![fellow fellow - PROUD feat. INK WARUNTORN [STRING QUARTET]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BQrVkMPTdHE/mqdefault.jpg)
Stu wanted revenge on Sydney because his parents got very mad and grounded him for life.
😂
His dad is gonna be so mad at him!
He’s far too sensitive.
😂😂😂 Stu is the Scream equivalent of Butters from South Park.
That's the most tragic and evil motive for any GhostFace without a doubt.
“My parents are gonna be so mad at meee 😭😭😭” remains one of the best line deliveries in all of cinematic history
I personally prefer “you hit me the phone Dick”
I like Scream 3, but having Stu return would've been way better!
How?! His brain was fried!
@@mightybitchy not really
@@mightybitchy a tv cant frie a brain
He should have been in Scream 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 100. The original cast was just too good, and Stu stood out the most. Come on, Mickey, Ms. Loomis, Roman, Jill and Charlie. They weren't funny at all. See Sid, we ask you a question .. and if you get it wrong, Booka! you die. I can't Billy ... you cut me too deep. I think I'm dying here man. Billy throws the phone at Stu's head. Owww, You hit me with the phone D.. ick.😁
The original film felt very much like an updated take on Hitchcock's film Rope.
There is no way Stu would be alive without Sydney knowing about it. There would’ve been A very high profile court case.
Not if he was paralyzed or at least they thought he was paralyzed.
@@TheSYPHERIA bc paralyzed people don’t stand trial?
Or they could of done it off screen and Sidney just simply didn’t want to talk about Stu. Thinking he’s in prison for life or on death row. So he wouldn’t be something for her to worry about
@@DevicCypher And then Dewey wouldn't have known he was alive and told her? And when the murders started again she wouldn't have even asked about him to make sure he was still arrested/ hospitalized?
if you listen closey in all the scream movies. They never say Stu was dead.
The only thing I like about the third movie, is that we learn more about sidneys mom . All the murders from the franchise was a chain reaction from her brief time in hollywood . If Sidneys mom didn’t turn away Roman ( her long lost son) , then the events of the first movie probably wouldn’t of happened.
True but Stu and Mickey would be still both killers lol and the Loomis family would’ve probably snapped over something eventually cause they were weirdos
having roman being the mastermind behind everything and supplying the motive to stu and billy in the first film seems far stretched to me, they would've like dropped a hint about Sidney having a brother or like a 3rd person being behind it as well.
I agree, it makes things come together to a decent conclusion at the time when it was going to be the final movie. Having Williamson write the dialog and make it more Scremy (make it fit with the tone of the 1st 2) would have made it better but the killer being her brother who started it all was the best way to end it.
O.M.GGGGGG! I'm SO pissed this brilliance just never got to exist!!!! So much depth.... gone. I view S3 as the Seed of Chucky of this franchise. It's all comedy to me. In fact, my favorite aspect of it was the two Gails because of their hilarious chemistry! I would've LOVED to see this evil, vindictive, MASTERMIND side of Stu... but now no one EVER WILL! I'ma go cry now
The idea is pretty interesting and I think could have worked, though his is of course after the fact. We already have a Scream 3 that is different than what Kevin Williamson write and I understand people people being split on this, but if done quite well this could have been a great Scream 3. Thanks for the video man, take care!
Kevin is a genius, that would be a better plot. But I’ll confess I like the mood of adventure the official version provides (besides I love Jennifer), and given the context of columbine tragedy, that even makes more sense to me. They did the right thing after all.
I would have preferred the original concept, 100%
I like the Roman brother twist and that they exposed predators like the actual Weinstein producer. Ahead of it's time in that regard. I liked Roman so much I named my psycho chihuahua after him.
Roman was meant to be a joke on Tarantino
Would have preferred this story line over the one we got
I’ve always like this idea but there is simply no way Stu can be alive and not have any characters be aware of it. That would have been a major court case and everyone involved would have to testify in court with Stu being present. And if Stu was alive wouldn’t the police consult him about it in prison or him at least be investigated to see if he was involved in some way. There are people copying what he did and being the only living ghostface I’m sure they would ask him questions about it. He the closest thing to an expert on ghostface
I think they could probably still do this now. I love the concept that it's a group of psycho fans behind it. Instead of having Stu survive maybe there are videotapes left from Billy & Stu on how to be a Ghostface killer, basically a spin on the Randy tape from Scream 3.
I like the original concept it sounds better
@HeyThatsAlex658 huuuu
@HeyThatsAlex658 ohhhhh no I agree. It’s a movie they lost out on scream 3
Yes I would prefer this version! Anything over that 'I'm your shoe-horned in half brother who only got to direct a Stab movie by pure chance' soap opera storyline.
Tbf Scream 3 does have its good points but it's just not as good as the others.
I kinda wish they actually did do that
Actually I would have to say No, since Maureen Prescott was the over arching theme of this series. It wouldn’t make sense to just bring back Stu unless he had a connection with Maureen. In the new trilogy maybe it could work, but ending it without closure for Sidney and Maureen had the better impact story wise.
agree, I felt scream 3 was actually a great full circle closure, loved how roman wasn't crazy and evil like previous killers and that they hold hands in the end. Of course all of the scream movies are absurd and over the top but that's why I love all of them.
@@philippillis9393 Exactly, but i wouldn't say they weren't evil except for lackies, Stu and Mickey were evil unlike the masterminds who were driven by revenge which falls in line with Roman but I do wish it was reveal Roman's partner ditched him at the end of his killing spree realizing the beytral he planned therefore he just killed everyone at the Stab 3 wrap party indiscriminately.
@@icaliver idk I think the mystery and whoddunit elements in 3 and 4 are the best
There were definitely two Ghostfaces in Scream 3 as there was a third GF in Scream. While there were only two Ghostfaces in Scream 2, it is possible an individual from Woosdboro, CA. traveled to Ohio with Debbie Loomis and provided the two GFs with logistical support. The two sorority girls, played by De Rossi and Gayheart, certainly were not GFs but were accomplices to Mickey. They watched the GF leave the sorority building, after GF stabbed Derek, and acted like nothing happen. Furthermore, they helped their sorority capture Derek and they informed Mickey where Derek would be after he was captured for giving his letters to Sidney. Finally, Gayheart sent Sidney that disturbing message in the library as she was there.
In Scream 3, the accomplice to Roman was working in the Sheriff's Department in Woodsboro. Who else could have ransacked the Sheriff's files looking for the location or at least contact information of Sidney? Only someone who was working in that department would know where to look.
In Scream 3, that accomplice was used in the Hollywood set scene and in John Milton's house. That accomplice also provided police escort to Martha Meeks. There is no way her parents would allow Martha Meeks to drive alone to Hollywood in which murders have taken place. They would only consent if a police member was transporting their daughter.
When Roman Bridger first approached Billy Loomis 6 years earlier and motivated him to kill Maureen P., he had nothing to do with choosing either of Billys accomplices(Stu Macher and the other individual who would later work in the Sheriff's Department in Woodsboro). However, as he witnesses their murdering of Maureen P. unbeknownst to those three, he takes note of the identity of Billy's accomplices.
Nearly 6 years after the brutal killing of his mother by those three, Roman suspects that the accomplice currently working in the Sheriff's Department was also an accomplice in the two massacres that followed that killing. Since he is resentful of the fact those two massacres made his sister Sidney a big star, he approaches the Sheriff's Department's entry-level police officer and gives that person an offer that person cannot refuse. That offer is to help him make his version of Stab 3 and help him kill Sidney in the end of that movie. If that young police officer refused to help, Roman stated that he witnessed that person's assistance in the murder of Maureen Prescott and that he would go to the police to report her. Since that person did not know that Roman met and knew Billy, the fledgling police officer felt compelled to co-operate with this Hollywood director. Since this person expressed a strong disdain for Sidney as they both had been classmates at Woodsboro High, that individual expressed enthusiastic support to Roman in helping him make Stab 3.
You meant Derek Feldman got shot right
@@MeltonVR He got shot by Mickey Ghostface!
Yiiiikeeesssss. A story centered around Gale while investigating murders on set Stab 3 while they're shooting in Woodsboro. I could see that being fine as a sequel, but if they were planning a trilogy, you needed Sidney way more than having her show up halfway through the movie. Honestly, they should've waited until everyone had a clear schedule for shooting Scream 3. I know that was a big reason why Neve wasn't in much of the movie, her schedule was too busy, and the studio wanted the 3rd movie out before the love for the Scream fizzled, but the writing didn't due the characters justice.
That Halloween intro was bad ass
It took 2 and a half minutes in a 6 minute video to get to the point, so I appreciated it less than I should have.
I really like Scream 3. It's not as bad as people say in my opinion. I like the script we ended up with❤️
I Love Scream 3 lol & I am glad too see someone else love it too! I am also a huge Matthew Lillard fan is the only stick in my crawl over it all because he was one of the original Ghostfaces & just seeing he return would be epic but I actually did love how Scream 3 turned out but it'd be so awesome maybe even if they bring him into 5cream the newest one!
I agree. It's really fresh and entertaining. And the setting makes it feel a lot bigger. If they just could've just tweaked a few things it would have been amazing.
They did well with Scream 3, and I feel it’s underrated. It branched from the school scene and into its own movie continuing the series….
They covered so much: Found out more of the connection with Maureen…. And the half brother, Roman, was a great twist and it makes good canon.
They still were able to use the ideas for Scream 4, which I feel it still worked out for the best.
I felt scream 3 was rushed and the movie plot didn't make sense for Dewey's character. Why would he be so eager to be involved in a production that glories his sister's death? It really seemed like everyone forgot that Dewey lost a loved one in the first scream movie. If he had been resistant and only went to hollywood be grudgingly, I think I would have liked it more. I will say, though, a movie talking about how young actresses are sexually exploited in a Harvey Weinstein movie no less, was definitely a head of its time.
I’m 50/50,I love the franchise,every movie they have done,soot would be great to have Stu back,but the grudge was held on longer to 5 or 6 so it shows he hasn’t forgot that night
Yess I would prefer Any scream with Stu in it! He was a big part of what make the 1st scream so Good!
I like the original idea by Williamson better. He would actually get to do this in a way when he made the tv series The Following
The original script sounds so good and is definitely better, not even a comparison.
I prefer the original screan 3 the movie went more into depth on sidneys mom. At the end we find out Roman told billy to kill Maureen. Without Roman none of this would have happened.
I would have loved for A third Ghostface to show up and with the voice modulator say, “You got to have a sequel. And it’s a real Screamer”
Stu is definitely still alive. Hope he returns in scream 5.
He's not
I'm not happy about it either but we get what we get
He was electrocuted when the TV fell on him.
So how would you explain him being alive? 🤣
Did he wake up in the morgue and everyone just forgot?
@@natsohigh5552 right. He was electrocuted by the TV. You literally see him die from it.
"He's Dead, Jim."
I prefer what we got. It could've been better executed, but I do prefer that story that connects back to the original.
Stu is coming. Mark my words!
OMG Im actually really sad now. This Scream 3 premise would have been amazing! :(
I'm genuinely mad we didnt get the original script
I loved scream 3. I would've loved that version for like part 4. Maybe Stu contacted Jill and Charlie and it begins
I wonder if they’re going to use some elements from this abandoned script for the new movie coming out and we’ve just all spoiled it for ourselves 😂😭
Yes please!!! I love this Scream$
Huh, I didn’t realize how many elements of scream 4 were originally from scream 3. I already knew about Stu’s “would be” return, but either scream 4 wouldn’t have existed, or it obviously would’ve been a completely different movie 😬
Your username made me giggle.
@@ct6852 lol
With Stu not being Confirmed dead the original concept would’ve been way better.
Hopefully a future adaption would happen for it. Wouldn’t even mind this idea popping up in some fashion for scream 5.
He's dead 🤣
How exactly would you explain him being alive?
@@natsohigh5552 The writer will always have a way
I agree and I really hope Stu is back for Scream 5
At this point, both Mathew Lillard and Skeet Ulrich could come back and play brothers of the original characters.
Considering Roman is the lamest Ghostface killer, I think I would have preferred this.
He’s the only one who did it alone, and he gave Stu that push…
@@liamroberts2576 Yeah I know, I've seen the movie. That doesn't mean it wasn't a poorly written character with a forced backstory. Also, Scott Foley is a good actor, but it wasn't the best performance.
@@alexlazzerly3677 I’m curious, what made Stu and Billy such compelling characters? Stu was a clown, and Billy a pussy boy…
not if Stu was stuck in jail the entire movie. would prefer his underlings helped with the escape, then the real fun begin. no need for a surprise reveal ending, just seeing Stu playing cat and mouse with Sid would be worth it.
@@mightybitchy There's no truly "compelling" character in Scream. They're just fun slasher movies. But Billy and Stu were at least entertaining and memorable. Matthew Lillard is incredible in the first one.
I would have def liked this version better than the scream 3 we got but scream 3 was still good
You can literally see him still alive in the second one during the college party scene. It’s only for a split second but it’s the same actor and everything
It's probably the worst in the franchise but it still has a special impact. I kind of dig the hidden brother angle but mostly the fact that the commentary was so before it's time. What this movie sheds light on is the profound basis of the #MeToo movement. So to have that be the horror story behind her mother's childhood and being produced by the Weinstein company it's meant to be for sure!
Worst ?watch scream 4 5 and 6
Yea, I think it's ironic that the dush bag producing the movie would turn out to be one of the worst offenders in Hollywood.
Love Gail Weathers! Would've loved a Scream with the focus on her.
I really hope Stu Macher comes back 🙏
Only thing that turns me off of the original scream 3 script is saying that the people involved faked their deaths. I wanna kno how many killers were in the cult that faked their death? Were there gonna be real kills alongside the fadeout deaths?
A slasher film where the deaths are fake would be kinda creative tho
@@mrcritical6751 it would be creative but it would need to be some kinda real blood shed at the end. Gotta make up for the fake-outs
I love scream 3 just the way it is honestly it perfectly ties the first 2 together with it
I love Scream 3 and would’ve been really disappointed with this version. There’s is no way way Stu could’ve survived, he was already dying from Billy stabbing him, let alone Sid kicking the crap out of him and dropping a fat back TV on his head. Let stu go
Scream 3 was rushed..... they should have waited a bit longer and made sure they had all their ducks in a row before starting production like the availability of Neve. They needed more Sydney, and scenes with her and Roman before the climax, like maybe him trying to tell her, but her brushing him off like Maureen did. I didn't like the fact they tried to get Roman to take credit for Stu/Billy. The whole thing wasn't developed enough. I still love the film though. As much as I want them to bring Stu back, it seems like it would be too early and now with obviously with decades in prison it makes sense to bring him back.
I agree it wasnt a shock as roman wasnt really shown much throughout the film
So far Scream 3 is my strong #2 out of them all! Only the original Scream is better in my opinion even with all of the flaws & complaints of Scream 3 I just like the huge indifferences compared to the others & the clever attacks & kills in Scream 3 were actually scary in some scenes but I would've honestly probably enjoyed Matthew Lillard as Stu Macher once again for his return & the story of the occult followers was so fresh & original; I believe that the original or alternative Scream 3 would've been just a little bit better mainly because of Stu Macher returning it would've been extremely interesting to see How Neve Campbell aka Sidney Prescott would've reacted & delt with the whole situation once she discovered it was him that would've been epic
I think Tara is faking her attack with the killer
And Sam is Billy’s daughter
Sam carpenter
(John carpenter )
Billy loomis
(Sam loomis)
And thats why #TheFollowing TV show was made,because thats how scream 3 was gonna play out.
I Love Me Some Scream 3 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕
Happy halloween!!!!
So Stu DID survive?
I would've liked this version of scream 3 but for it to be like a cult of ghostface would really be hard in my eyes to portray
Stu is definitely coming bk lol. I'm goin for 3 killers this time as it's never been done.
Too bad, that sounds like a much better version! Can you provide a link to where we can read the screenplay?
The full screenplay was never written. It was just an outline written by Kevin, and then one thing led to another and Kevin didn't end up writing it.
I would have loved to see that scream 3 it would have been so much better
The first script with stu would fit more in scream 2 instead of 3 and then keep the script we got for 3 the same
I want Stu back in Scream 5
He’s fucking dead!
I still have one of the same “Telephone Voice Changer 📞” they used as a prop in Scream 1!
First off I want to say I am aware of Roger Jackson (The Voice) and it’s another human saying the lines, not just a modified voice - like the kind the prop would have produced (higher, lower & robot settings LOL).
Yes the one that Billy tosses to Stu and he says “Suprise, Sidney!” through it. Even Sid gets a chance to turn the tables and uses it against the (now exposed) ghost faces, mocking them with “Are you alone in the house?”
I’m so glad ive decided to keep it for over 24 years now! FYI it does NOT work well over a cellular phone, it worked perfectly on a landline though! #GhostFace #RIPWesCraven #OGCharactersNOTsafe #ItsAlwaysSomeoneYouKnow (except in #3, she had no idea who Roman was).
Happy Halloween boils and ghouls 🔪🎃👻
Hmmm...so I'm curious, if they went back and used some elements of the original Scream 3 for Scream 4, then could they do that again with the next movie coming out? Like what if they do run with that idea of Stu being alive and is pulling the strings here?
Hope it is bloody AF💋
Would’ve been such a good idea.
I really think we are going to get something similar in 5.
YES, SCREAM 3 WOULD HAVE BEEN 10× BETTER THAT WAY AND I THINK STU SHOULD BE BACK NOW. Anyone who says "That doesn't make sense " has no idea what the human body can take, go watch some TH-cam clips of people walking off events that should have killed them instantly, or take my example of being shot twice by a 357 magnum, I'm the gut and the back of the leg. I WALKED out of the hospital 11 hours later. WHY DIDN'T SIDNEY KNOW/COURT CASE? A. The same people asking that just went to see Halloween Kills. B. The Sheriff and Dewy took care of it i.e. they knew Sidney had been through enough with her mom already and didn't need another court case + the video evidence by Gale in part 1 showing Stu AND for all those asking how? STU WAS PARALYZED FOR A DECADE OR TWO AND IN A COMA, THEY NEVER THOUGHT HE'D GET OUT. 20 years later he wakes up thinking the events just happened and takes another 10 rebuilding his body. Boom
Kevin Williamson did get to use his concept of someone orchestrating murders from prison, when he made that show The Following.
Probably would have preferred this over Scream 3 but then I wonder what Scream 4 would look like..
Always interesting, it sounds like Scream 4 was a update on the original Scream 3 plot. I hated scream 3 and not mad on scream 4 (total mess of an opening) at the time but looking back it made sense to move it in to the fame part of the story and that being in Hollywood and what happened to maurine there. which is a big part of the killers plans through out and so going back with an actual new lens for 5 I can not wait. it’s shrugged off the baggage of the old story and I hope they bring the spirit and characterisation of 1 and 2 which was DOA in 4.
I love scream 4 opening, I remember I was so surprised the first time watching, I was like: wooow loool this is great! Also Jill killed the bitch Trevor cheated her with. Jill is the best killer in the franchise, batshit crazy but in a sinister, realistic way. Scream 4 also got it right with streaming, social media craze and need to be always online, connected with fans and with ever more engaging content. it was brilliant although the middle section of the movie feels chaotic and messy and a bit random. also i didn't love going back to a school setting with teenagers.
We want stu back in scream 5
I'm glad the idea of Stu returning was scrapped I don't like the concept of ever having what suppose to be completely dead characters returning in Scream like Scream not a supernatural movie.
Never was it confirmed that he died. He also never got his last scare like all the other killers.
@@kingragnarlothbrok5835 need a little more Stu in my life
They definitely should have gone with this script. Stu was far too sensitive and his mom and dad were probably so mad at him. I would have absolutely loved to have watched this over the other one.
Definitely prefer this version
I dont think its possible for stu to be alive and if he was he would have severe brain damage then basically rendering him useless. What i love about ghostface is he is not supernatural and he is killable bringing stu back is not a good idea
Here's the deal, it's 10× LESS REALISTIC that in Scream 5 they'll be a group of NEW RANDOM KILLERS OR REALITIVES. Do you understand what the human body can survive, people have jumped put of planes and their parachute didn't deploy resulting in them hitting the ground from 10,000 feet and once they've recovered its fine. This is a rare thing, but just to show you. I got shot twice by a 357 magnum at point blank range and walked out of the hospital 11 hours later. The human body is incredible, what's 100% unrealistic and Wes and Kevin mentioned this in Scream 2, is having more than 2 killers chase Sidney throughout her whole life. They included Mrs. Loomis because that made sense and she had to search the country saying "There are only 97 ACTIVE serial killers in the country today, so Mickey here was quite a find." Stu could come back twice and that would still be more realistic than Sidney dealing with a 8th, 9th or 10th killer in her life.
The problem I have with that is the fact they never brought up Stu’s survival in the sequel. I realize if they did people would figure out it beforehand but still.
No you’re right. He t ruins their reveal but only because it’s a bad reveal. No one would have kept his being alive a secret and killers don’t get witness protection 😂🤷🏾♂️
@@B-Dad Right lol I would just prefer him in prison and somehow able to be tied to current murders but him being alive is no secret that just never got mentioned cause it wasn’t relevant to the storyline or something like that
I liked the Scream 3 we got. I liked that it was set in Hollywood. It was way ahead of its time. Williamson could actually have gone this route with Scream 4 but had already recycled the idea into The Following TV series, which is prob why he didn't. Stu coming back seems silly.
So, 6=sidney sidelined, gail main, stu revealed at end, 7=?? Sidney on the front foot as stalking Stu and his conspirators?
Lol scream 5 is gonna be like pt3 would have been with the fan club killers
Wasn't that what Scream 4 sprt of did?
RE Stu coming back... THE GUY GOT ELECTRICUTED BY A TV!!!! How can/would he survive that?!? Bloody ridiculous!
IKR?! Some fans are shit brains, and they dare criticizing?!…
This sounds so cool
Would have been so much better than what we got
Tu est gentil jaime beaucoup des emission que tu fait ❤ est surtout des filme aussi
This sounds perfect. I don't give a shit about Maureen or Hollywood. A return to Woodsboro and Stu being in the movie would have been perfect and of course the smart, brutal writing of Kevin Williamson instead of the corny shit Ehren Kruger came up with. I will forever wish for the Scream 3 that never was.
scream 3 is actually very clever and well written, the meta humour is done in a way that feels organic as they're actually with actors during the production of a movie within a movie. scream 1 and 2, and also 4 to some extent, have too much cheesy commentary on horror movies done by cheesy teenagers and while it felt cool in the 90s it kinda aged fast. Idk I love all 4 but 3 while not the most gruesome and tense, is still probably my favorite along with 4.
My theory kinda won't make sense but Stu could've survived he would survive and get a disguise colored contacts style his hair different do a different voice and get new clothes then seek medical attention before getting a very VERYYYYY realistic ID and they fall for it and he's ok he makes a warehouse thing where he kills stuff and tortures things and cleans the meat off bones he's gone insane and really snapped he goes after Sidney but classic scream he kills a few people Killing a few character's violently we see the sorority girls from scream 2 get murdered one by one very violently and Sidney swears she sees something before going back to Gale and Sam and everyone they investigate sadly without Dewey (Rip💔) a few movie time goes by of Stu doing terrible things, he thinks it's about he goes to Sidney's house she opens the door and he ambushes her stabbing her she screams and falls down they wrestle him stabbing her and she gets the upper hand and stabs him in the heart it hurts really bad he barely survives and as the last scream movie... Neve Campbell can finally move on!😓 He stabs her in the throat as she bleeds to death as credits roll
Granted I love all the Screams but this script would of made scream 3 alot better. I like the 3rd one but then I dont.
Considering the only GOOD thing of Scream 3 was Parker Possey’s character, if she would have been in that version of Scream 3 it would have been much better than the original
They should’ve used this script
This would definitely had set him up to he in scream 5 and 6 im really upset they didnt put him back or talked about him at all
What if we finally get to see what was on the recording Gale made when she snuck the camera into Stu's house during the party?!?!? It was pointed at the couch in middle of the living room the whole time!! It it would be awesome to have that footage. Even things that may have happened out of view of the camera we would still have the audio. And what if it at the very end it shows Stu's body moving from underneath the TV...
Do we know if Mathew Lillard got to keep his payment? Lol
Apparently he did 👀
All the sequels are just trying to live up to the original. The original plot for three sounds good in theory but might have been dreadful. Wouldn’t they know Stu had survived ? Not very believable. I wonder if Kirby will make a cameo in 5 at all? Yes, it’s a sequel
I'm 1 of those screamers that likes parf 3 the most lol. This would have been interesting because Stu was great but I love scream 3 the way it is. Since so many die hard fans know that Stu was going to be alive originally they probably will not go with this plot.
I think 3 would have been excellent with some tweaks and the Stu plan is rubbish.
If he's alive, who's to say the other killers aren't alive?
Shot in the head? So what? There are loads of films with characters who survive that. Part of the Scream story is it's always a new threat under the same mask.
I mean you have a point. I wouldn't mind seeing billy again but i'm 100% sure that will never happen. Stu on the other hand, still possible. He never got his final scare.
@@kingragnarlothbrok5835 Charlie never got his final scare either, he’s 100% alive. Also, Hallie is alive, and so is Casey Becker. She def faked her own death. Come to think of it, Jill was only shot in the chest, she must be alive!
🤦♂️
Ghostface has Intelligence For The First Scream Film Since 1996 The Original and I Understand That He was a Teenage Killer but He Got a Be Smart Enough To Kill Someone Without Anyone Knows That’s It is The Exactly a Same Thing To Do About The Teenager Serial Killer Ghostface
Stu pulling strings sounds dope & maybe they'll use it in 5. As for 3, I like roman's motives & that he worked alone. But scream 3 in a whole was very disappointing. The voice changer suck & some of the kills were goofy.
Uh what’s your favorite scary movie?
scream 2
@@kyomoto2084 now for the real question, who’s the killer in Halloween?
Billy i failed to avenge u
@@ghostsmiley267 it’s alright man
Who am i guess
Was ghostface holding the Halloween kills pumpkin.
bring back stu!