@@dannyleo4791 it wasn't a joke... But I would like his response of he is investigated.... Maybe he should pay the homeless victims real money so that they won't sue wahahaha
Expecting to reclaim full governmental control through one election cycle is unrealistic; true reform requires changing the very systems that perpetuate these issues. The consolidation of power we witness today was not achieved through straightforward or entirely ethical means; it often involved leveraging loopholes and exploiting systemic vulnerabilities, akin to guerrilla tactics. This method was facilitated by a complex network of NGOs, external contractors, and other bodies that now function almost autonomously, much like alternative government entities. These groups, along with welfare programs and various commissions, have developed their own self-sustaining ecosystems. Moreover, the influence of religious movements and their extensive networks has significantly mobilized people, embedding deep roots across various sectors, including influential financial circles and political spheres. These powerful interest groups, from corporate sectors to judicial bodies fearful of downsizing, possess substantial resources and a broad base of support. They will undoubtedly resist any threats to their established power and complexity in the legal and regulatory frameworks. Given this entrenched resistance, those aiming for reform may need to adopt unconventional strategies that mirror the complex and multifaceted approaches originally used to seize and maintain control. This might involve navigating and possibly restructuring the intricate legal landscapes to dismantle the advantages that these groups have solidified over time. AIPAC , JUDICIAL BODIES and LAWYERS want more laws and loopholes! it's their BREAD and butter! Regaining control of a government influenced by myriad actors beyond the electoral system requires more than just winning an election, even by a landslide. The power wielded by NGOs, corporations, judicial appointees, and regulatory bodies means that electoral victories are only a part of the equation. To enact meaningful change, a comprehensive and long-term strategy is essential, one that extends beyond the typical four-year election cycle and addresses the entrenched systems of influence and operation. This strategy must include reforms that tackle the roles and regulations of non-elected bodies and align them with democratic values and accountability. Additionally, it must consider the influence of corporate and non-governmental players who shape policy outcomes behind the scenes. Without a robust plan that spans decades and is prepared to reform the foundational structures of power, real change remains an elusive goal. we can break it down as follows: Logical Inconsistency in Electoral Influence on Non-Electoral Institutions: The logical disconnect lies in the assumption that electing new leaders directly translates to control over autonomous institutions and corporations. Since these bodies often operate independently of direct political influence-being led by appointees rather than elected officials-electoral change does not necessarily impact their operational decisions or internal policies. This weakens the direct link between voting and controlling certain types of institutional or corporate power. Problem of Appointed Positions and Indirect Influence: The appointee system introduces another layer of separation from direct voter influence. Appointees are selected based on decisions by elected officials, which can be influenced by political, personal, or professional connections rather than voter preferences. This can lead to the appointment of individuals who may not align with the public's interests or the electoral mandate, diluting the effectiveness of electoral results in achieving real change in these institutions. Self-Preservation of Institutions: Agencies and governmental bodies typically have inherent motivations to justify their existence and expand their mandate. This self-preservation instinct can lead to enforcement of regulations or policies that may not align with public interest or effectiveness, simply to validate the institution's continued operation. This creates a scenario where even with changes in leadership, bureaucratic inertia and self-interest can stifle meaningful reform. Impact of Non-Governmental Entities Like Corporations: Corporations, which hold significant power in modern societies, are not controlled by electoral processes but by market forces and regulatory frameworks set by these autonomous institutions. Their influence on policies and the economy can surpass that of many elected bodies, further complicating the direct impact of electoral politics on broader power structures. Election Integrity Concerns: When the bodies that oversee elections (like electoral commissions) also stand to benefit from certain political outcomes-specifically, expansions in governmental size and power-this can lead to doubts about the integrity and impartiality of the electoral process itself. If the process is perceived as compromised, then the premise of taking back power through elections becomes even more tenuous. In summary, while elections are a fundamental aspect of democratic governance, the assumption that they alone can enable citizens to regain control over all aspects of government power is logically flawed. The influence of autonomous institutions, the indirect nature of appointee positions, the self-preserving tendencies of bureaucracies, the significant power of corporations, and concerns over election integrity all dilute the direct impact of electoral results on governance and power dynamics. This calls for a multifaceted approach to reform that includes, but is not limited to, electoral change.
I think you don't understand the meaning of being a real deal, what real deal?, he talks about things beyond his comprehension and what he's doing now? a dating app? lol, you kidding me?, if he understood at least 1% of what he said, he would start the church committee what a political Apac religion and money are running the POLITICS buddy
@@TheLobohobo"Nice try" ??? Please attempt to make that make any sense in response to suewinters1398's very true statement. If you think John is a funny guy, you are just as scumbaggy as he is, and something is heading your way and will suprise you when you least expect it, because you put that pain boomerang out there in the form of rooting for belittling others in the first place.... Look out!
One Day, In Person Voting, Requiring a Government Issued Photo ID. No Mail In Voting. Unless a Person IS Disabled and Can't Get to The Polls, Those People Should Be Required to send a Copy of Their ID with Their Ballot
John gives fake money to homeless so they get arrested when they try to use it. Then he goes across the street to Fosters to film himself doing a cringe take while eating a Sunday. A truly soulless and inhuman monster.
Image of the beast
King
King Douchebag.
This dude does shorts. He's fkn hillarious
Mcentee be arrested for spreading counterfeit money to the homeless
@@RedTitan5also for jan 6th
@@jesipohl6717 so his involved???
He’s as dry as a saltine crakkker. What’s it like being a maga cult member ?
Depressing if you find him funny. Another slimy grifter.
John is the man. MAGA
Mcentee be arrested for spreading counterfeit money to the homeless
@@RedTitan5 Spot spreading lies about him.
@@dannyleo4791 it's on his video.. and it gets viral... Then he said it's a joke afterwards...wahahah... He is afraid if investigation....
@@RedTitan5 It was a joke. He just wanted to trigger the liberals lmao
@@dannyleo4791 it wasn't a joke... But I would like his response of he is investigated.... Maybe he should pay the homeless victims real money so that they won't sue wahahaha
Expecting to reclaim full governmental control through one election cycle is unrealistic; true reform requires changing the very systems that perpetuate these issues.
The consolidation of power we witness today was not achieved through straightforward or entirely ethical means; it often involved leveraging loopholes and exploiting systemic vulnerabilities, akin to guerrilla tactics. This method was facilitated by a complex network of NGOs, external contractors, and other bodies that now function almost autonomously, much like alternative government entities. These groups, along with welfare programs and various commissions, have developed their own self-sustaining ecosystems. Moreover, the influence of religious movements and their extensive networks has significantly mobilized people, embedding deep roots across various sectors, including influential financial circles and political spheres. These powerful interest groups, from corporate sectors to judicial bodies fearful of downsizing, possess substantial resources and a broad base of support. They will undoubtedly resist any threats to their established power and complexity in the legal and regulatory frameworks. Given this entrenched resistance, those aiming for reform may need to adopt unconventional strategies that mirror the complex and multifaceted approaches originally used to seize and maintain control. This might involve navigating and possibly restructuring the intricate legal landscapes to dismantle the advantages that these groups have solidified over time.
AIPAC , JUDICIAL BODIES and LAWYERS want more laws and loopholes! it's their BREAD and butter!
Regaining control of a government influenced by myriad actors beyond the electoral system requires more than just winning an election, even by a landslide. The power wielded by NGOs, corporations, judicial appointees, and regulatory bodies means that electoral victories are only a part of the equation. To enact meaningful change, a comprehensive and long-term strategy is essential, one that extends beyond the typical four-year election cycle and addresses the entrenched systems of influence and operation. This strategy must include reforms that tackle the roles and regulations of non-elected bodies and align them with democratic values and accountability. Additionally, it must consider the influence of corporate and non-governmental players who shape policy outcomes behind the scenes. Without a robust plan that spans decades and is prepared to reform the foundational structures of power, real change remains an elusive goal.
we can break it down as follows:
Logical Inconsistency in Electoral Influence on Non-Electoral Institutions: The logical disconnect lies in the assumption that electing new leaders directly translates to control over autonomous institutions and corporations. Since these bodies often operate independently of direct political influence-being led by appointees rather than elected officials-electoral change does not necessarily impact their operational decisions or internal policies. This weakens the direct link between voting and controlling certain types of institutional or corporate power.
Problem of Appointed Positions and Indirect Influence: The appointee system introduces another layer of separation from direct voter influence. Appointees are selected based on decisions by elected officials, which can be influenced by political, personal, or professional connections rather than voter preferences. This can lead to the appointment of individuals who may not align with the public's interests or the electoral mandate, diluting the effectiveness of electoral results in achieving real change in these institutions.
Self-Preservation of Institutions: Agencies and governmental bodies typically have inherent motivations to justify their existence and expand their mandate. This self-preservation instinct can lead to enforcement of regulations or policies that may not align with public interest or effectiveness, simply to validate the institution's continued operation. This creates a scenario where even with changes in leadership, bureaucratic inertia and self-interest can stifle meaningful reform.
Impact of Non-Governmental Entities Like Corporations: Corporations, which hold significant power in modern societies, are not controlled by electoral processes but by market forces and regulatory frameworks set by these autonomous institutions. Their influence on policies and the economy can surpass that of many elected bodies, further complicating the direct impact of electoral politics on broader power structures.
Election Integrity Concerns: When the bodies that oversee elections (like electoral commissions) also stand to benefit from certain political outcomes-specifically, expansions in governmental size and power-this can lead to doubts about the integrity and impartiality of the electoral process itself. If the process is perceived as compromised, then the premise of taking back power through elections becomes even more tenuous.
In summary, while elections are a fundamental aspect of democratic governance, the assumption that they alone can enable citizens to regain control over all aspects of government power is logically flawed. The influence of autonomous institutions, the indirect nature of appointee positions, the self-preserving tendencies of bureaucracies, the significant power of corporations, and concerns over election integrity all dilute the direct impact of electoral results on governance and power dynamics. This calls for a multifaceted approach to reform that includes, but is not limited to, electoral change.
Was the fired?
John McEntee is the real deal. Men of true integrity with ANY role in politics is rare. Let’s make this Country Great Again!! God Bless you Brother
He got fired from the white house for financial issues LOL
@@C87-q9j wrong
@@richardholly4989 it's not. look it up. Also why do you think he runs a dating website when he's mid 30s and single 🤔
I think you don't understand the meaning of being a real deal, what real deal?, he talks about things beyond his comprehension and what he's doing now? a dating app? lol, you kidding me?, if he understood at least 1% of what he said, he would start the church committee what a political Apac religion and money are running the POLITICS buddy
Yes a real deal in scamming the homeless
"It doesn't further our Agenda"
"The Right Stuff" crashed GRINDR!!! Lol
Mediocrity is a must in the Trump administration..
GREAT AND THANKS
Giving homeless a counterfeit money is worst...
You know that was a joke - right?
@@suewinters1398 but those homeless people aren't... Someday you will suffer karma
@@suewinters1398 Nice try… Goodbye. 👋🏻😎💥
… & illegal! ☝🏻😎✨
@@TheLobohobo"Nice try" ??? Please attempt to make that make any sense in response to suewinters1398's very true statement.
If you think John is a funny guy, you are just as scumbaggy as he is, and something is heading your way and will suprise you when you least expect it, because you put that pain boomerang out there in the form of rooting for belittling others in the first place....
Look out!
Great and interesting guy.
He got fired for crippling gambling debt
@@C87-q9j So?
Mcentee be arrested for spreading counterfeit money to the homeless
For me to poop on
he does great trick shots with footballs etc., thats his strength.
The only transition that’s gonna happen is when this guy pulls a Catelyn Jenner.
The Right Stuff was a failure, he got kicked out of the White House for financial crimes, and now people think he's someone to look to for advice?🤣🤣🤣
Wrong
@@richardholly4989 Facts don't care about your feelings🤣🤣🤣
Mcentee be arrested for spreading counterfeit money to the homeless
@@richardholly4989
@@richardholly4989lol, since were wrong, why don’t you provide your sources? 😂
He Should Get Rid of The ATF. They are Out Of Control!
Hej FBI, this guy here.
2028.
Mcentee be arrested for spreading counterfeit money to the homeless
Jewish lies
04:25.
One Day, In Person Voting, Requiring a Government Issued Photo ID. No Mail In Voting. Unless a Person IS Disabled and Can't Get to The Polls, Those People Should Be Required to send a Copy of Their ID with Their Ballot
Absolutely!!
Dems voting policy is.. Vote Early, Vote Often
@@richardholly4989 Then how come only Republicans get caught voting multiple times?
ONE ID FOR EVERYTHING, FACIAL RECOGNITION ONLY.
DRIVERS LICENSE, VOTER REGISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY, PASSPORT, HUNTING & FISHING LICENSE, GUN REGISTRATION (IF REQUIRED).
@@joyeldred2232 literally 1984 solutions...
W barrel
Parents share this with your kids who don’t know what or how to get where they want to be.
Omg please don’t 😬 yikes
"Take it back" 😂 Good luck with the grift, fellas.
Stupid and overly confident, a very dangerous combination.
It’s almost like you guys want to meet your makers sooner rather than later.
Fascist
And?
Yeah, so what?
John gives fake money to homeless so they get arrested when they try to use it. Then he goes across the street to Fosters to film himself doing a cringe take while eating a Sunday. A truly soulless and inhuman monster.
He’s handsome so that makes it okay. Try getting over it.
It's a joke and actually something a Democrat would do. You are not good at recognizing witty sarcasm.
@@lindah2651 Name ONE Democrat, ONE, who would do it?