ESDEP - European Steel Design Education Programme These are not my videos, I found the CD's somewhere and uploaded them for everyones use. No copyright fringe intended.
The end credits show a date of 1986 but it could easily have been from 15 years earlier as produced by the Open University. All that was missing was a chap in cavalry twill trousers and a Tattersall shirt with a narrow knitted scarf, smoking a pipe, having previously hung up his tweed jacket with leather patches on the elbows.
These days the section if the 'stocky beam' as its called in this is square, then it is called a universal column or UC and if it's I in shape (so the old I beam nomenclature) then a universal beam or UB. In the steel business (rather than the engineering business) they are always UB or UC so everyone knows if it's a column or a beam. I transport and deliver these in lengths of up to 22m but most commonly in the range of 12-15m. One I delivered the other day was 14t for a 12m beam but it was a welded one off and would have to be made to order. By far the most common ones are rolled. For these type of beams remember this rule of thumb, If the height is greater than the width = UB (universal beam) If its a square, so the height and the width are the same = UC (universal column)
The section shape is not the only difference. The steel's material properties also have an effect, where steel may be rolled for compressional or bending purposes. Beams can be H section as well as columns, and yet function differently. You are unlikely to see a steel I beam of lengths beyond those because of material limitations. Members longer than that are usually designed as truss elements, which are much more efficient in comparison to their self weight
Thank you for the video Sir! I have an exam in two weeks and i love to see how this happens in real life to get a good understanding of it. Greetings from Germany.
Very educational! Qualitative rather than quantitative. Bracing of beams - your ordinary carpenter has been doing that with timber first floors for years - i.e. herring bone strutting and bridging between floor joists - and of course the floorboards nailed to those joists restrain the top edge.
Nice old timey engineering video. The concepts are still valid. 5 minutes of dead air time (snow) at the end. We used to call the image on a TV "snow" when no signal was broadcast. I think maybe this was a video tape of a movie shot on "film".... ask your grandpa what film movies were... called the "flicks" in the really old days.
2023 - much appreciated. Flash backs to the lab - without the pressure to takes notes, understand my notes and observe all at the same time for a cluttered mind 😂
When loads are applied to top flange (compression flange) additional torsion distortions may occur . Studs are welded and cast into concrete deck . We use AISC formulas in United States ASD or LFRD . Dynamic loading and temperature expansion forces also must be considered. Nice ,Thank you.
A good video to give some visual insight in the behaviour of beams. You can calculate something but actually seeing something moving/bending under a load is very informative. However the film quality is really "seventies/eighties/VHS?" bad.
I’m not in the engineering community, but I’ve not seen I beams “bolted” together in many years, everything’s welded together now. Having said that, engineers still have to “characterize” beams and put them through actual laboratory tests to validate the performance is as reported.
Fuck me standing there no orange jacket no hard hat glasses of ear defenders damm he should have been in a million bits 🤣 Or could it be back then common sense applied
Look, a real life reason for algebra. Thought I’d never see that. I usually just overkill the beam when I use them in simple construction applications.
Apparent similar instability situation where all adverse conditions are observed plus heavy corrosion in progress on the longest structural cantilever span ever built. That is the 100 years plus, Québec bridge. Search and see Flickr/ Rouille et déformations sur le pont de Québec.
Does it melt when jet fuel burns on it? Can it collapse at free fall speed with zero resistance to the beams that had no heat ? Would it cause a near by building to also collapse at free fall speed ?
Hi dear Thank u for this useful video I just would like if u give me the dimensions of the beams in 11:44 Please help me Coz I need this dimensions in my education project Plz Reply me soon 🥺
burning in open space or free not really, burnig in conditions like in the jet engine, high pressure fast moving air, pulverised fuel etc etc ....burn even thru titan alloys. some special ceramics will stand a chance. the magic of the jet engine is not let the flame touch anything in the engine.
![CONCURSO SPAGHETTI BRIDGE 2019 en UAH - Concurso Puente de Espaguetis [Real Poly Bridge 😀]](/img/n.gif)
Forget all the silly comments, I found this very interesting and informative. The layman never usually gets to see this sort of information.
I am glad that you found this useful.
TH-cam is free... for now. You could simply watch these video indefinitely if you'd like
Captain Obvious here, mechanical engineers use this information all of the time.
Very good video for civil engineering students in present year
R my BP llû
Perfect video for when i need to fall asleep. ......Saved to favorites
I've been a P.Eng. for about 30 years and I found this very interesting. Thank you so much for taking the time to share.
This weed is strong .good vid.
This is why long and slender beams should never be painted orange.
Thanks for that summary. I’ll keep my orange paint for the stocky beams.
@@albertbatfinder5240 What about yellow paint? Is yellow paint a better structural element that has greater strength?
@@handyman8764 no it gives it explosive aspect. the orange made it bounce, and red means fast.
I wanted my beams bright green, would that be acceptable?
Orange beam bad
Thank you for this. This just helped me visualize clearly these theories
This is a great movie for that all important first date! You young guys need to get up with this stuff.
2:14
Also consider the episode ‘Slots and slits under strain’
oh god that high pitch sound takes me back
It's giving me Tinnitus
This video is gold 👍🏽 thank you for uploading 🙏🏽
The end credits show a date of 1986 but it could easily have been from 15 years earlier as produced by the Open University. All that was missing was a chap in cavalry twill trousers and a Tattersall shirt with a narrow knitted scarf, smoking a pipe, having previously hung up his tweed jacket with leather patches on the elbows.
And the 11:50 Steam Train leaving the station.
Cool video, which shows the real behaviour! Thank you for sharing!
To me, it seems instructional videos from the 90s are more useful and informative than any instructional video from today. Dunno why though.
These experiments are very very helpful in determining the applicable calculations and why. Thanks a lot.
These days the section if the 'stocky beam' as its called in this is square, then it is called a universal column or UC and if it's I in shape (so the old I beam nomenclature) then a universal beam or UB. In the steel business (rather than the engineering business) they are always UB or UC so everyone knows if it's a column or a beam.
I transport and deliver these in lengths of up to 22m but most commonly in the range of 12-15m.
One I delivered the other day was 14t for a 12m beam but it was a welded one off and would have to be made to order. By far the most common ones are rolled.
For these type of beams remember this rule of thumb,
If the height is greater than the width = UB (universal beam)
If its a square, so the height and the width are the same = UC (universal column)
The section shape is not the only difference. The steel's material properties also have an effect, where steel may be rolled for compressional or bending purposes. Beams can be H section as well as columns, and yet function differently. You are unlikely to see a steel I beam of lengths beyond those because of material limitations. Members longer than that are usually designed as truss elements, which are much more efficient in comparison to their self weight
I remember seeing this as a kid when the OU played stuff early in the morning. Amazing.
Highly valuable video! Thank you very much! All concepts of beam cleared in no time
😮😮ķķķķ😮bir şekilde ķ😮😮bir kaç k😮ķkķ😮bir 😮ķ😮bir 😮ķ😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅nasılsın 😮😮😮
This is just Brilliant! many thanks for sharing it.
Thank you for uploading this!
Wow! Well explained! Thank you!
This is the most 1986 videotape I've seen in awhile.
Thank you for the video Sir!
I have an exam in two weeks and i love to see how this happens in real life to get a good understanding of it.
Greetings from Germany.
Very educational! Qualitative rather than quantitative.
Bracing of beams - your ordinary carpenter has been doing that with timber first floors for years - i.e. herring bone strutting and bridging between floor joists - and of course the floorboards nailed to those joists restrain the top edge.
this video has aggravated my tinnitus... thanks.
2:13 well played my freand. lol well played.
Slender man needs to show a little restraint.
Very useful for understanding the concept
Fantastic thank you so much for sharing!
Thank you for uploading this video, phoneomeons of structural design are very well explained....
That music though.....I feel like I'm about to learn how to cook McDonald's burgers.....
This video is very useful to get knowledge about steel I beam
thanks you for uploading
Amazing Video. Thank u❤
Nice old timey engineering video. The concepts are still valid. 5 minutes of dead air time (snow) at the end. We used to call the image on a TV "snow" when no signal was broadcast. I think maybe this was a video tape of a movie shot on "film".... ask your grandpa what film movies were... called the "flicks" in the really old days.
Whew! I had to take a break. Too damned exciting!
Excellent, thank you!
Fantastic video
22:04 and on is just my favorite moments of this documentary... really wow!
JCW Camera-man I checked to see what you were talking about. I feel trolled
Enjoy going to your shitkicker job tomorrow morning.
My engineering education on the other hand, allowed me to semi-retire by age 40.
@@markmark5269 Hi Mark
outstanding... love from india..🇮🇳
dude you gotta edit the audio on this, the 15khz flyback is killing me!!
That intro feels straight out of Robocop. I was have expecting Dick Jones to start talking about OCP steel.
2023 - much appreciated. Flash backs to the lab - without the pressure to takes notes, understand my notes and observe all at the same time for a cluttered mind 😂
Thanks for posting this, we as a structural engineer know the significance of this
Thank you for this! :-)
When loads are applied to top flange (compression flange) additional torsion distortions may occur . Studs are welded and cast into concrete deck .
We use AISC formulas in United States ASD or LFRD .
Dynamic loading and temperature expansion forces also must be considered.
Nice ,Thank you.
Thank you
Very nice
The music is stupendous. But that high ring is driving me nuts.
Dude broke out the "intruder" while finger bending the ole weak axis beam...jeezus !
Well, this came up. I found it very interesting. I'm off now for my own experiments, I think I'll see how twisted that ol' Jim Beam can get ya.
Gold
Very usefull thank you
All testing was performed in BH. (Before Hydraulics).
Superbdemonstrstion andtalented lecture thanks
2:02 did he just give us the finger from 20th century?
A good video to give some visual insight in the behaviour of beams. You can calculate something but actually seeing something moving/bending under a load is very informative.
However the film quality is really "seventies/eighties/VHS?" bad.
Nice video. Any others like this anyone know about?
Thanks Emre good luck with your PhD
We gain good knowledge
Oh my.
Oh your.
Codes should come with videos of testing like this one, thank you.
You are supposed to have repeated the experiments in the lab as part of the mechanics of materials and strength of materials subjects.
This was all pre-Eurocodes so look in BS5950
I’m not in the engineering community, but I’ve not seen I beams “bolted” together in many years, everything’s welded together now.
Having said that, engineers still have to “characterize” beams and put them through actual laboratory tests to validate the performance is as reported.
Fuck me standing there no orange jacket no hard hat glasses of ear defenders damm he should have been in a million bits 🤣 Or could it be back then common sense applied
When I heard the announcers voice, I half expected the word "behavior" to be spelled with a u
How did I get here..
Torsion in slab and warping restraints please. Add video ...love from India'
2:15 he flips you off
lmao that needs to be a gif
Does office fire melt steel beams
Look, a real life reason for algebra. Thought I’d never see that. I usually just overkill the beam when I use them in simple construction applications.
Actually there is a Casio FX-CG50 that you could use to solve these equations...
I love steel beams more than rebar ones
0:30 Is that a Ford Transit Mark one ?
Wow
el-aah-stic
Interesting, the things that us non engineering folk take for granted.
Don’t forget to smash that like button!
I now can build beam tower and bridge
Think about the quality of life of steel beams, they deserve to be unrestrained.
That’s why I only purchase ‘free range’ steel beams. 😆
In the wild perhaps, but in captivity they must be restrained. The life forms they support are too fragile to withstand their flights of fancy.
Apparent similar instability situation where all adverse conditions are observed plus heavy corrosion in progress on the longest structural cantilever span ever built. That is the 100 years plus, Québec bridge. Search and see Flickr/ Rouille et déformations sur le pont de Québec.
can't say center not technical enough. must say "centroid". but this isn't a triangle. im confused.
How the hell did the CRT whine get into the video file?
It’s not “crt whine”
Where can i download my certificate of completion of graduation in civil engineering?
Omg the noises at the end
2:49 nail clipper
pretty disturbing
Does it melt when jet fuel burns on it? Can it collapse at free fall speed with zero resistance to the beams that had no heat ? Would it cause a near by building to also collapse at free fall speed ?
سعر الكمرة 10 سم ارتفاع في طول 7متر
Difference between twisting and warping is not clear.
Bender shud get a job here
Hi dear
Thank u for this useful video
I just would like if u give me the dimensions of the beams in 11:44
Please help me
Coz I need this dimensions in my education project
Plz Reply me soon 🥺
The film is over twenty years old, and nobody's going to give you the dimensions. Learn to estimate.
You needed steel handbook from a manufacturer like Tata Steel. The dimensions are in those
This video was shot on an Apple iphone
the best part starts at 22:00 no just kidding
Anyone else getting Hitchcock vibes at 16:17?
Good evening. Showing our age..s.
CONSPIRACIES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Am I the only one laughing at all the sexual innuendos in this video? 🤣🤣🤣
everyone sees what she or he is missing :D:D
2:15 Rude...
Can jet fuel melt steel beams?
No
burning in open space or free not really, burnig in conditions like in the jet engine, high pressure fast moving air, pulverised fuel etc etc ....burn even thru titan alloys. some special ceramics will stand a chance. the magic of the jet engine is not let the flame touch anything in the engine.
#neverforget
This made me think of 9/11/2001
wtf!!!!!!!!
⁴4
Horrible 240p quality . Viewing is painful.
cinema rips of the first matrix were far worse
Poor baby. HD or 4K wasn’t conceivable when this was produced. Much less 720. Welcome to the analog world.
wow. great
Thank you