Free men should never be denied access to weapons, if they are dangerous enough that they can’t be trusted with a firearm, then keep them locked up, or give them the death penalty. With background checks it is proving your Innocence everytime you by a gun. That goes against the presumption of innocence.
While in the Marine Corps, I learned that one way to get your message across is to win the hearts and minds of the People. That’s what I always think about when debating someone, find something you have in common and use that to get your point across. And that’s what I thought when I was watching your video. So I absolutely loved it when you stated that in the end because that is really important when talking new laws or talking points, especially political debates. I started to realize within the past couple years that in the gun debate, it’s not people who are anti-gun, but rather just misinformed. We need more people like you to talk to anti-gunners in protests or rallies so they can hear our side of the debate. Unfortunately it also takes people, like the one in the video, to be open-minded and not surrounded by a bunch of extreme anti-gun minded people to realize what a lot of these new gun laws being proposed can actually do to hurt people who are at a disadvantage when trying to protect themselves.
Thanks for taking it easy on this ol beta dude.. its really frustrating talking to leftists, but many times they arent as radical as they try to appear. Reason and logic will always win if both parties have an open ear. Good job man.
@Cobra Kai Back in the day people actually shot like that. Up until the late 50s everyone shot one handed with a goofy bladed stance. Then Weaver came along and started winning competitions in 1959 using both hands and changed the whole world. Modern isoscolece style stances didn't start catching on until the 80s. So if this guy the last time this guy shot was some time in the 70s, his shitty stance and grip make sense. No one was analyzing the biomechanics of marksmanship in great detail, yet. Even today we're still making advancements and discoveries.
Can't be used as a weapon to harm others though. Plus the benefits (the taste) far outweight the slight chance of heart disease from eating a single cheeseburger. Try again.
@@neeldasgupta2441 still a valid point just cause you ain’t fat don’t mean other aren’t and guns aren’t the only thing that can hurt someone it just makes it easier so you should own a gun to make it easier to fight back
Exactly right @James Lewis. Also need a gun because once inflation starts and people can’t afford gas and food. When people get hungry they will do anything. Be prepared.
Applied Defense guy: “Automatic and semi automatic rifles are responsible for three percent of gun deaths.” Anti-gun nut: “Let me tell you about the etymology of the word ‘gentleman’”
His description of how to shoot and the way he pretended to hold a rifle had me dying. I can just see him getting blue in the face from holding his breath too long.
My first thought when he was describing what he had shot, over description of how he shot etc is BS. More likely only used an arcade rifle to shoot tins. Or is angry because he failed the mental checks
Actually, the guy is wrong. You are supposed to break the shot after exhaling and before next breath. If you hold your breath, your muscles are tense and it can throw off your shot. Most anti-gunners need a muzzle brake for a 22 LR :)
@ Murder is an illegal killing. Legal killings include executions by governments after due process, killings that result from actions of self defense (as long as the defender's intent is only to stop the attack and not to kill the attacker), and killing the enemy during acts of war in defense of one's country.
Kyle Kohler So, if someone other than you decides that you shouldn't live, regardless of all the good you may have done, you're supposed to just sit down and wait for him to kill you? No. God does not say such a thing.
Guns are like martial arts, the more you train and the more you're proficient in it, the less you're inclined to use it frivolously. But if a time comes that you need it, you can use it properly.
“Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” ― James Madison
@@maximkonechno8742 I'd rather be statistically shot than stabbed with a knife, like the rest of the world. People will always find the means to defend themselves. At least, we're more transparent about it.
No question about this, our constitution says, this should not be infringed upon. It's our right to carry guns to protect ourselves, especially from government.
It’s an assault weapon only if it is used in an assault. Any weapon used in an assault regardless of what it is, is an assault weapon. Be it a firearm or not. That’s how I regard it anyway.
@@johnkranig2054 looks like you need to correct your definition details below. Also one could use a bat...that would be an "assault weapon".... by your definition...we must outlaw baseball...baseball bats are use d as a weapon not just for sports....there for taking you logic further, a knife used for cooking/preparing a meal....if used that would be an "assault weapon" ....therefore all knives need to be made illegal. CNBC "AR-15-style rifles are NOT 'assault weapons' or 'assault rifles,' according to NSSF's website. "An assault rifle is fully automatic - a machine gun. Automatic firearms have been severely restricted from civilian ownership since 1934" *FYI- you need a Class 3 SOT(Federal Firearms License- FFL)- which is highly regulated/watched and you have to pay a tax every year, think it is about $200/per every qualifying weapon[machine guns(which actually is an assault weapon), silencers, short barrel rifle- modified barrel make shorter then standard size, short barreled shotgun(ie. sawed off shotgun). Why the AR 15 is not an assault rifle? Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities(full auto, 3 round burst, single shot). Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire. Automatic- 1 trigger pull and holding down of trigger, gun fires until it runs out of ammo. Semi-automatic- 1 trigger pull = 1 shot, you have to pull the trigger for every shot. "AR" comes from the name of the gun's original manufacturer, ArmaLite, Inc. The letters stand for ArmaLite Rifle - and not for "assault rifle" or "automatic rifle".
@@at6098 I agree with you that an AR 15 is not an assault weapon nor a bat, knife or what ever, should be outlawed. But I also stand by what I said about assault weapons. Just because the government doesn’t see it that way or you, I stand on what I said. You and the government are looking only at a firearm as assault weapon. I’m looking at weapon of choice or opportunity that is used to assault someone. In my opinion. I don’t care if you agree with it or not. Instead of holding the instrument used accountable hold the one using it accountable.
@@johnkranig2054 I agree with holding the user accountable. You have to becareful with just throwing the term "assault weapon" around because of how one side has used that labeling incorrectly. Because by you using it because AR15 can be used in an assault, gives fuel for the ideology of how the one side wishes to label everything as such and they dont even care/understand what the actual definition and meaning is of the terms they use, that is why I brought up a baseball bat and a knife, by there logic and with your statements, just because something is used to commit an assault makes it an assault "weapon" that logic puts the blame on the item used to commit the assault and not the actual person that committed the assault...so item used in an assault doesn't make the weapon used and "assault weapon" because "assault weapon" by definition is clear that it is a specific type of weapon with a very specific type of features. Like instead of saying "assault weapon" when it doesn't actually apply because "assault weapon" and "semi-auto weapon" are 2 very different types, like you said you would prefer to address the person committing the assault Assault(v)- make a physical attack. So a person that uses a baseball bat, knife, or semi-auto- is by definition committing "assault" not the weapon, so by labeling AR-15 as "assault weapon" just because it was used, when clearly it isn't because of technical specs and by several definitions and actually looking at what the term "assault" actually means- which holds the person accountable...instead of mislabeling firearms on a definition that doesn't apply, just say that the action if it was by baseball bat, knife for firearm is what is it...assault....nothing more or less. By using they term "assault weapon" incorrectly you are giving one side ammo due to your and others misinformation to take 90% of guns away from lawbiding civilians. Remember words have power and when used incorrectly that spreads false propaganda the one side will use to take away all rights. Because in many nations it has been seen that when they had what we call in the USA the "2nd Amendment" they had their rights, but when their government took their gun rights they lost all of their rights. The 2nd Amendment is what protects all of our rights, with out that....welcome to 1984(novel).
@That Guy The NFA was originally enacted in 1934. Similar to the current NFA, the original Act imposed a tax on the making and transfer of firearms defined by the Act, as well as a special (occupational) tax on persons and entities engaged in the business of importing, manufacturing, and dealing in NFA firearms. The law also required the registration of all NFA firearms with the Secretary of the Treasury. Firearms subject to the 1934 Act included shotguns and rifles having barrels less than 18 inches in length, certain firearms described as “any other weapons,” machine guns, and firearm mufflers and silencers. While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934. As structured in 1934, the NFA imposed a duty on persons transferring NFA firearms, as well as mere possessors of unregistered firearms, to register them with the Secretary of the Treasury. If the possessor of an unregistered firearm applied to register the firearm as required by the NFA, the Treasury Department could supply information to State authorities about the registrant’s possession of the firearm. State authorities could then use the information to prosecute the person whose possession violated State laws. For these reasons, the Supreme Court in 1968 held in the Haynes case that a person prosecuted for possessing an unregistered NFA firearm had a valid defense to the prosecution - the registration requirement imposed on the possessor of an unregistered firearm violated the possessor’s privilege from self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Haynes decision made the 1934 Act virtually unenforceable. Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968 Title II amended the NFA to cure the constitutional flaw pointed out in Haynes. First, the requirement for possessors of unregistered firearms to register was removed. Indeed, under the amended law, there is no mechanism for a possessor to register an unregistered NFA firearm already possessed by the person. Second, a provision was added to the law prohibiting the use of any information from an NFA application or registration as evidence against the person in a criminal proceeding with respect to a violation of law occurring prior to or concurrently with the filing of the application or registration. In 1971, the Supreme Court reexamined the NFA in the Freed case and found that the 1968 amendments cured the constitutional defect in the original NFA. Title II also amended the NFA definitions of “firearm” by adding “destructive devices” and expanding the definition of “machine gun.” Firearm Owners’ Protection Act In 1986, this Act amended the NFA definition of “silencer” by adding combinations of parts for silencers and any part intended for use in the assembly or fabrication of a silencer. The Act also amended the GCA to prohibit the transfer or possession of machine guns. Exceptions were made for transfers of machine guns to, or possession of machine guns by, government agencies, and those lawfully possessed before the effective date of the prohibition, May 19, 1986. Source: www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act
@@anoldflame5595 false. do some research on those rallies. there were a few negligent discharges as well as actual purposeful murders with firearms. im all for firearms but you need to be honest about the things that happen with them. dont lie. or dont speak unless you know what you are talking about
oh ok my bad lol. i thought you were one of those lefties trying to use lies as fact and feelings as truth xD hard to tell jokes from that nowadays cuz the lefties breeding like rodents and they everywhere now xD
Well done, ADC! It is no small thing to help a person replace emotional responses with reasoned thinking. "Emotional response" is the strategy the anti-2A activists use because it can cloud reason. You stayed on-topic, retained your composure, and had the facts ready. The subject of this video, to his credit, actually listened and engaged with you. "It does not take a majority to prevail...but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men" - Samuel Adams.
We appreciate that response. I think it's more conducive to preserving our rights to focus on the goal and not just winning the argument. The moment people realize that Firearms are not a right or left issue but human rights issue, we will begin to win more people over. Always argue from the perspective of your opposition
I got what he said an yeah funny enough ur breathing is something u have to be aware of with long range shooting. An with riffles it didn't matter the riffle it just important with a ar as it is with anything else
Absolutely. Unfortunately when people who are anti gun use this term, you have to avoid the "semantics" (It's not but ya know..) debate or else you end up in this endless cycle of what an "assault rifle" is and they usually end with a "agree to disagree". Even if they are wrong. I found arguing this AFTER getting through to their root argument is way easier. But it is annoying so I understand.
When martial arts came up and he began to show his amazing skills at twisting his own foot and lifting his hands to shoulder level... All I could hear in my head was Stuart from MadTV... "Look what I can do!"... He was so drunk he will never remember this. I can't agree that progress was made.
nd as for "hearts and minds", I decided a while ago the shelve that notion. 2 to the chest and 1 to the head will be my version of hearts and minds if one of these woke mobs tries to fuck around and find out at my house. Now I will try to succinctly explain the "why". I grew weary of seeing Stephen Crowder, James O'Keefe, Owen Schroder, Ben Shapiro, and every other conservative ask one of these leftist idiots (after being spat on by a dozen other leftists they tried to peacefully engage in discourse) ask that one question that leftist tards STILL can't give a solid answer to: WHAT IS AN ASSAULT RIFLE? This leftist idiot's definition is one of "those" guns that allows you to kill everyone in 4 seconds, while he motions as if spraying and praying from his hip (big surprise). Tl Dr: You never see an educated leftist spewing this Beto-speak because the .01% who bother to educate themselves NECESSARILY CHANGE THEIR OPINION DURING THE PROCESS OF LEARNING ABOUT IT. Keeping such tarded opinions intact after you learn "facts" takes a special kind of stupid. This leads me to the conclusion that they don't care about facts and becoming educated. Which necessarily means they don't care about making meaningful positive change (for example lowering violent crime overall, not just deaths from metal bang sticks that are longer, but go bang similarly to the short ones). The next logical step forces me to ask "if they don't care about what they claim to, then... wut? Being right, being victims, and having YOU to blame for their lack of whatever they feel they are lacking. And, try as we may, we will never be able to fill the massive void that would remain if we took victimhood away from them. We still do HAVE to take it away for the sake of us, our families, the country, God, and everyone else deserving of simple peace. So until the "tolerant" left stops imitating fascists while displaying the absolute greatest show of 100% pure hypocrisy I have ever seen (little runts about small enough I could punt them, and absolutely would, running around trying to deny our free speech while claiming they are "anti" fascist... When the Ritalin and adderall begin to wear off and they can have a civil conversation... then maybe I'll take them out of my sight picture.
I smell lies coming out from that old man mouth 🤣🤣the way he explain things what he have experienced in the past, and his point of view it’s irrelevant
Well its all about disarming the public . drugs are and have been illegal for years how is that going. 2nd amendment was to stop tyranny period not about hunting.
This guy reminds me of the "what's your name?" guy. He also seems to be your typical virtue signaling liberal who makes up stuff and uses strawman fallacies to make his point
When I saw his firearm grip, I cringed so hard that I got a good face workout. At this rate, my face muscles (whatever they're called) will be super strong in days😂
Damn I can’t imagine how many firearms are in that place at the same time and not a single round exited a barrel.. made me think guns don’t go off by itself.. WOW mind blowing hahhaha
Absolutely. We have done this with many more left-leaning friends. Most of them change their mind within the first visit. Some, it takes a little more work. Be open to them and their hesitation and people will begin to see the light with firearm ownership.
There are two kinds of people. Ones who listen and ones who are just waiting to talk. This guy is just waiting to talk and not hearing anything they are saying..
Interesting story. When I made brown belt, sensei made a statement that I hadn't heard before. That was, that becoming a black belt, means that now, you are willing to learn. Till that point, I thought I was learning. It means that mentally, you are prepared to actually learn karate. There's a difference.
Dude was a joke who probably cant pass a mental background check himself. Couldnt even pay attention to the conversation and kept being really spacy and weird. He kept looking away as if he wasnt even listening or didnt even want to.
Glad to see that there are people out there willing to talk. Conversation is the key to spreading the truth. When we blurt out our side, it won’t take root, but when we explain the truth patiently it can grab the attention needed to change the world. Well done!
I am worried that they will want to take away my “assault” weapon, which is a sharp pointed stick! Actually in WW1 and WW2 bolt action rifles were the assault rifles. They will go after everything!
"Here's a special secret that I know but not even the military knows. When you aim you should hold your breath. That's why I was so good when I showed my wife how to shoot a BB gun." That guys is a complete twat.
I respect both of the gentlemen in this debate because they both remained calm and went in with a non confrontational attitude! We need more people like that!
The way these people respect each other during this debate is awesome. The only way to change minds is to listen and respond intelligently to each point, without belittling the opposing viewpoint. Most anti-gunners simply do not know what they are talking about and need to be respectfully educated. Great job!
I've been homeschooled all my life and have been hunting all my life. I have never been close a firearm accident or murder. I don't want to be a criminal but if an officer tries to take my guns, I'm sorry but I'm going to use my guns to defend my guns.
Also if you guys didnt see it in the description, here is a dude I arrested who was a FELON and talked about how easy it was to buy a gun. "Mind Blowing" th-cam.com/video/6rA_PptHRV4G/w-d-xo.htmlun
By definition assault rifle = a rifle used in an assault of 19 used in mass shootings 11 were rifles, how many AR 15s are responsibly owned and LEAGALLY used in the US. AR is armalite brand rifle,not a model. 2nd amendment we need to defend.
He ain't on our side now! He is an obvious BETA! He just goes with the flow until he feels safe again and cuddling w his blankie and he WILL continue with his uniformed views and will never recognize the Historical past on the subject.
This guy is stupid! We need to ban these fully semi-automatic assaults weapons and these AR-17s(which stands for assaults rifle) Also no hollow-tip armor piercings round and no high capacity clips (that has more rounds than a standard capacity)
There are so many people,that if approached like this,would understand the 2nd amendment,and why it's so important,and a gun is no better than,or worse than,the person toting it
Jesus Christ saves FROM sin. * Romans 3:23 * all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; * Heb 9: 27 * And as it IS appointed unto men once to die, but after this the JUDGEMENT. Yes YOU WILL BE JUDGED by a God that hates sin. * Isaiah 64: 6 * But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away. * Revelation 21: 8 * But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. * Romans 5: 8 * But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. * John 3: 16 * For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. * John 14: 6 * Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. * Romans 10: 9-10. * That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. * For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. * Jesus said John 5: 24 * Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. * 1John 5: 10-13 * He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. * And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. * He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. * These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. * Ephesians 2: 8-9 * For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: * Not of works, lest any man should boast. * Romans 8: 1 * There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. * 1 Corinthians 15: 3-4 * For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; * And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: * 2 Corinthians 5: 21 * For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him * Repent, trust Jesus, & live Holy Actswayevangelism.com
Being gentle and respectful and having facts to back up an argument or dispute goes a long long way! The minute you stiffen up and encroach on someone’s ideas or beliefs can shut them down and force them in the wrong direction almost instantly. Even if they’re not 💯 sure of their argument they will go defense and then you’ve lost them. Great job staying patient and persistent with facts and respect!! See it worked on this dude for a few minutes anyway. Now he’s the largest gun owner of semiautomatics in Virginia! Hahahhaha
"I think that if every body was just nice and gentle then we wouldnt need guns" umm yeah but let's not operate on wishful thinking and hypothetical. The world is a cruel and violent place.
I'll say what everyone is thinking but doesn't want to say out loud. The A R 15 is what is most likely to be our go to firearm when we need to overthrow overthrow a unjust government unjust government
Someday the Devil may appear at your doorstep. Odds are he won’t. But, if and when he does show up it’s best to be prepared for worst case scenario instead of wishing in those last moments that you hadn’t been so shortsighted and passive.
That Dude with the camo mitts/gloves talking about how he's "all for background checks" is a bigger Fudd than the dude with the sign, who is just ignorant.
This whole protest is a perfect example of how an armed society is a polite society. No one is going to go cause trouble and try to hurt, rob, or rape people when almost everyone in that area is armed and perfectly capable of eliminating them as a threat....
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for the input guys! We just launched our new site for training. Check us out at www.ADCTraining.us
Free men should never be denied access to weapons, if they are dangerous enough that they can’t be trusted with a firearm, then keep them locked up, or give them the death penalty. With background checks it is proving your Innocence everytime you by a gun. That goes against the presumption of innocence.
While in the Marine Corps, I learned that one way to get your message across is to win the hearts and minds of the People. That’s what I always think about when debating someone, find something you have in common and use that to get your point across. And that’s what I thought when I was watching your video. So I absolutely loved it when you stated that in the end because that is really important when talking new laws or talking points, especially political debates. I started to realize within the past couple years that in the gun debate, it’s not people who are anti-gun, but rather just misinformed. We need more people like you to talk to anti-gunners in protests or rallies so they can hear our side of the debate. Unfortunately it also takes people, like the one in the video, to be open-minded and not surrounded by a bunch of extreme anti-gun minded people to realize what a lot of these new gun laws being proposed can actually do to hurt people who are at a disadvantage when trying to protect themselves.
Thanks for taking it easy on this ol beta dude.. its really frustrating talking to leftists, but many times they arent as radical as they try to appear. Reason and logic will always win if both parties have an open ear. Good job man.
If you dont want a gun, dont buy one, but dont tell me I cant.
absolutely correct
Just like abortion, right?
@@shawnjenkins7469 yes to an extent I can say I hate your choice to get one but I don’t think I should interfere
It is your choice
@@shawnjenkins7469 the difference is owning a gun doesn’t cause the death of an unborn child/stop a human heart beat!
"I shot .45s, I was really good" proceeds to grab his wrist.......yeah, no you didn't and know you weren't.
Come on don't infringe on a man's freedom to hold a colt. 45 the way he wants to
“I know karate! Watch this!”
*stands with one foot backwards to pretend he knows how to do a round house kick.
That guys a joke.
@@Dakarn surprised more people didn't point this out, guys got his head up his backside
@Cobra Kai Back in the day people actually shot like that.
Up until the late 50s everyone shot one handed with a goofy bladed stance. Then Weaver came along and started winning competitions in 1959 using both hands and changed the whole world.
Modern isoscolece style stances didn't start catching on until the 80s.
So if this guy the last time this guy shot was some time in the 70s, his shitty stance and grip make sense. No one was analyzing the biomechanics of marksmanship in great detail, yet.
Even today we're still making advancements and discoveries.
That actually used to be a proper grip.
Why do you need a triple bacon cheeseburger, heart disease is the number one killer.
We are going to have another march on Washington when they want to ban those too Im sure
We won the war, where's my triple decker heart with extra diabetes!
I want one...because they are GOOD!..you know what they call a quarter pounder in France.
Can't be used as a weapon to harm others though. Plus the benefits (the taste) far outweight the slight chance of heart disease from eating a single cheeseburger. Try again.
@@neeldasgupta2441 still a valid point just cause you ain’t fat don’t mean other aren’t and guns aren’t the only thing that can hurt someone it just makes it easier so you should own a gun to make it easier to fight back
We need whatever gun we feel comfortable using to protect ourselves and family and to be on a level field with our tyrannical government
I use a PPQ, my dad a 1911. Both using the same Z-Max rounds in .45 ACP.
Exactly right @James Lewis. Also need a gun because once inflation starts and people can’t afford gas and food. When people get hungry they will do anything. Be prepared.
Exactly!
In that case, I only feel comfortable with a backpack-fed minigun. Lol
Agreed
"When someone takes one to a school yard..."
Oh you mean one of those gun free zones? How's that working out?
Another masterpiece of Biden's
Love that he was actually willing to talk agree or not that is super rare these days
Everyone wins when we talk. Well done, guys
Thanks
@@AppliedDefenseConceptsLLC and thank you as well
Applied Defense guy: “Automatic and semi automatic rifles are responsible for three percent of gun deaths.”
Anti-gun nut: “Let me tell you about the etymology of the word ‘gentleman’”
Yeah it was out there
This guy is out to effing lunch.
An armed man can choose to be gentle. An unarmed man is just defenseless.
His description of how to shoot and the way he pretended to hold a rifle had me dying. I can just see him getting blue in the face from holding his breath too long.
He certainly was a...unique individual. At times, too unique.
"Holding a rifle",?, I thought he was doing his best Jimmy Hendrix impersonation.
“Ima black belt”
“Only had to use it twice”
My first thought when he was describing what he had shot, over description of how he shot etc is BS. More likely only used an arcade rifle to shoot tins. Or is angry because he failed the mental checks
Actually, the guy is wrong. You are supposed to break the shot after exhaling and before next breath. If you hold your breath, your muscles are tense and it can throw off your shot. Most anti-gunners need a muzzle brake for a 22 LR :)
Anti-gun dude: “I’m an evolutionist.”
Also Anti-gun dude: “I’m against survival of the fittest.”
Keeping arguments consistent is hard work. Harder when you are out in left field.
No matter how we evolve there will always be evil in the world that we must defend ourselves from.
We are not evolving....rather, we are devolving. Our DNA is becoming more corrupted with each generation.
Bang you said what I was thinking
@ Murder is an illegal killing. Legal killings include executions by governments after due process, killings that result from actions of self defense (as long as the defender's intent is only to stop the attack and not to kill the attacker), and killing the enemy during acts of war in defense of one's country.
Kyle Kohler Self defense is murder?
Kyle Kohler So, if someone other than you decides that you shouldn't live, regardless of all the good you may have done, you're supposed to just sit down and wait for him to kill you? No. God does not say such a thing.
It's nice to see people actually converse rather than argue I appreciate this conversation
Thank you, we appreciate your comment.
Guns are like martial arts, the more you train and the more you're proficient in it, the less you're inclined to use it frivolously. But if a time comes that you need it, you can use it properly.
Absolutely 💯 spoken like a responsible weapon owner
EXACTLY WHY THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD ISSUE AUTOMATIC RIFLES TO CIVILIANS AND PROVIDE BASIC TRAINING AS A GESTURE OF INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY.
100% true. People like to buy the tool and feel it gives them power. Training makes the difference.
Also, the last thing I want is to be dusted by some dude with a Hi Point pistol who just so happened to be better trained than me.
“Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”
― James Madison
Almost everywhere you can get a gun. For hunting, self defence or sport. But you don’t need assault riffle or small handgun “just in case”
@@maximkonechno8742 The Second Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.
@@bungholeshagnasty i bet you like whats going on in USA now. Enjoy your rights.
@@maximkonechno8742 Thanks
@@maximkonechno8742 I'd rather be statistically shot than stabbed with a knife, like the rest of the world. People will always find the means to defend themselves. At least, we're more transparent about it.
He acted like he knew about guns and looked like an idiot doing it.
They always do
No question about this, our constitution says, this should not be infringed upon. It's our right to carry guns to protect ourselves, especially from government.
I was just thinking about this, is there any other item thats covered under two amendments (2nd&5th)?
You will protect yourself aggainst drones and rocket artilery?
@@dejanstoimenovski2350 Your indentured servitude is dually noted.
@@JustAworm82 that means nothing
@@dejanstoimenovski2350 if need b
That old man is a sunflower child. Completely lives in his own contemplative head.
Definitely
One too many acid trips
AR-15 isn't an assault weapon(rifle)- AR means Armalite
It’s an assault weapon only if it is used in an assault. Any weapon used in an assault regardless of what it is, is an assault weapon. Be it a firearm or not. That’s how I regard it anyway.
@@johnkranig2054 looks like you need to correct your definition details below. Also one could use a bat...that would be an "assault weapon".... by your definition...we must outlaw baseball...baseball bats are use d as a weapon not just for sports....there for taking you logic further, a knife used for cooking/preparing a meal....if used that would be an "assault weapon" ....therefore all knives need to be made illegal.
CNBC "AR-15-style rifles are NOT 'assault weapons' or 'assault rifles,' according to NSSF's website. "An assault rifle is fully automatic - a machine gun. Automatic firearms have been severely restricted from civilian ownership since 1934" *FYI- you need a Class 3 SOT(Federal Firearms License- FFL)- which is highly regulated/watched and you have to pay a tax every year, think it is about $200/per every qualifying weapon[machine guns(which actually is an assault weapon), silencers, short barrel rifle- modified barrel make shorter then standard size, short barreled shotgun(ie. sawed off shotgun).
Why the AR 15 is not an assault rifle?
Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities(full auto, 3 round burst, single shot). Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.
Automatic- 1 trigger pull and holding down of trigger, gun fires until it runs out of ammo.
Semi-automatic- 1 trigger pull = 1 shot, you have to pull the trigger for every shot.
"AR" comes from the name of the gun's original manufacturer, ArmaLite, Inc. The letters stand for ArmaLite Rifle - and not for "assault rifle" or "automatic rifle".
@@at6098
I agree with you that an AR 15 is not an assault weapon nor a bat, knife or what ever, should be outlawed. But I also stand by what I said about assault weapons. Just because the government doesn’t see it that way or you, I stand on what I said. You and the government are looking only at a firearm as assault weapon. I’m looking at weapon of choice or opportunity that is used to assault someone. In my opinion. I don’t care if you agree with it or not. Instead of holding the instrument used accountable hold the one using it accountable.
@@johnkranig2054 I agree with holding the user accountable.
You have to becareful with just throwing the term "assault weapon" around because of how one side has used that labeling incorrectly. Because by you using it because AR15 can be used in an assault, gives fuel for the ideology of how the one side wishes to label everything as such and they dont even care/understand what the actual definition and meaning is of the terms they use, that is why I brought up a baseball bat and a knife, by there logic and with your statements, just because something is used to commit an assault makes it an assault "weapon" that logic puts the blame on the item used to commit the assault and not the actual person that committed the assault...so item used in an assault doesn't make the weapon used and "assault weapon" because "assault weapon" by definition is clear that it is a specific type of weapon with a very specific type of features. Like instead of saying "assault weapon" when it doesn't actually apply because "assault weapon" and "semi-auto weapon" are 2 very different types, like you said you would prefer to address the person committing the assault
Assault(v)- make a physical attack.
So a person that uses a baseball bat, knife, or semi-auto- is by definition committing "assault" not the weapon, so by labeling AR-15 as "assault weapon" just because it was used, when clearly it isn't because of technical specs and by several definitions and actually looking at what the term "assault" actually means- which holds the person accountable...instead of mislabeling firearms on a definition that doesn't apply, just say that the action if it was by baseball bat, knife for firearm is what is it...assault....nothing more or less.
By using they term "assault weapon" incorrectly you are giving one side ammo due to your and others misinformation to take 90% of guns away from lawbiding civilians.
Remember words have power and when used incorrectly that spreads false propaganda the one side will use to take away all rights. Because in many nations it has been seen that when they had what we call in the USA the "2nd Amendment" they had their rights, but when their government took their gun rights they lost all of their rights.
The 2nd Amendment is what protects all of our rights, with out that....welcome to 1984(novel).
@That Guy The NFA was originally enacted in 1934. Similar to the current NFA, the original Act imposed a tax on the making and transfer of firearms defined by the Act, as well as a special (occupational) tax on persons and entities engaged in the business of importing, manufacturing, and dealing in NFA firearms. The law also required the registration of all NFA firearms with the Secretary of the Treasury. Firearms subject to the 1934 Act included shotguns and rifles having barrels less than 18 inches in length, certain firearms described as “any other weapons,” machine guns, and firearm mufflers and silencers.
While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934.
As structured in 1934, the NFA imposed a duty on persons transferring NFA firearms, as well as mere possessors of unregistered firearms, to register them with the Secretary of the Treasury. If the possessor of an unregistered firearm applied to register the firearm as required by the NFA, the Treasury Department could supply information to State authorities about the registrant’s possession of the firearm. State authorities could then use the information to prosecute the person whose possession violated State laws. For these reasons, the Supreme Court in 1968 held in the Haynes case that a person prosecuted for possessing an unregistered NFA firearm had a valid defense to the prosecution - the registration requirement imposed on the possessor of an unregistered firearm violated the possessor’s privilege from self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Haynes decision made the 1934 Act virtually unenforceable.
Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968
Title II amended the NFA to cure the constitutional flaw pointed out in Haynes. First, the requirement for possessors of unregistered firearms to register was removed. Indeed, under the amended law, there is no mechanism for a possessor to register an unregistered NFA firearm already possessed by the person. Second, a provision was added to the law prohibiting the use of any information from an NFA application or registration as evidence against the person in a criminal proceeding with respect to a violation of law occurring prior to or concurrently with the filing of the application or registration. In 1971, the Supreme Court reexamined the NFA in the Freed case and found that the 1968 amendments cured the constitutional defect in the original NFA.
Title II also amended the NFA definitions of “firearm” by adding “destructive devices” and expanding the definition of “machine gun.”
Firearm Owners’ Protection Act
In 1986, this Act amended the NFA definition of “silencer” by adding combinations of parts for silencers and any part intended for use in the assembly or fabrication of a silencer. The Act also amended the GCA to prohibit the transfer or possession of machine guns. Exceptions were made for transfers of machine guns to, or possession of machine guns by, government agencies, and those lawfully possessed before the effective date of the prohibition, May 19, 1986.
Source:
www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act
"I shot myself with a BB gun as a kid so I dont think anyone should have guns." Is what I heard from this guy.
Speaking of negligent discharges. How many happened during BLM rallies?
Zero. Because they weren't negligent.
They sure burned down plenty of buildings though.
@@anoldflame5595 false. do some research on those rallies. there were a few negligent discharges as well as actual purposeful murders with firearms. im all for firearms but you need to be honest about the things that happen with them. dont lie. or dont speak unless you know what you are talking about
@@oakandthepack4887 *called a joke.
oh ok my bad lol. i thought you were one of those lefties trying to use lies as fact and feelings as truth xD hard to tell jokes from that nowadays cuz the lefties breeding like rodents and they everywhere now xD
"I has pellet guns and .22s! I shot my boss's 9mm!"
Ooooo watch out everybody, we got a badass over here! 😂
Well done, ADC! It is no small thing to help a person replace emotional responses with reasoned thinking. "Emotional response" is the strategy the anti-2A activists use because it can cloud reason. You stayed on-topic, retained your composure, and had the facts ready. The subject of this video, to his credit, actually listened and engaged with you.
"It does not take a majority to prevail...but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men" - Samuel Adams.
We appreciate that response. I think it's more conducive to preserving our rights to focus on the goal and not just winning the argument. The moment people realize that Firearms are not a right or left issue but human rights issue, we will begin to win more people over. Always argue from the perspective of your opposition
He doesn't need a gun, he has a black belt. He's had to use it twice.
Was it just me who laughed at that ?
@@garymccreath2773 I was going to laugh but I needed to quickly pivot to see who was behind me
Awww he got upset he got chuckled 😂, whatta baby
He def was out there
Lesson learned: if you want to hit the target, hold your breath.
100% And grab your wrist when you shoot.
Well if you have the hiccups? 😂👍
@@jason4453 whisper peanut butter
I got what he said an yeah funny enough ur breathing is something u have to be aware of with long range shooting. An with riffles it didn't matter the riffle it just important with a ar as it is with anything else
“assault weapon” lmao if I hit someone with a balloon and hurt them is that then considered an assault weapon? 😮
Right
Do you seriously not understand how dangerous an assault balloon is??
@@user-rm8gk8gr3g "Why would anyone need an assault balloon?" Ban them NOW so crazy criminals can't get ahold of them.
@@user-rm8gk8gr3g for real man, I saw a circus clown make an inflatable clipazine for his assault balloon
@@user-rm8gk8gr3g Have you ever been hit squarely in the face by one of those punching balloons?
Those things sting...a bit.
"because I hold my breath, and then squeeze it gently"
😂👍
Excellent video, but PLEASE set the straight on the AR15 NOT being an “assault rifle”.
Absolutely. Unfortunately when people who are anti gun use this term, you have to avoid the "semantics" (It's not but ya know..) debate or else you end up in this endless cycle of what an "assault rifle" is and they usually end with a "agree to disagree". Even if they are wrong. I found arguing this AFTER getting through to their root argument is way easier. But it is annoying so I understand.
@@neeldasgupta2441 it stands for ArmaLite Rifle
@@neeldasgupta2441 It stands for "Armalite" not "Assault rifle" dumbass. Go fuck off
@@fetusman2248 He was asking a question though?
@@AppliedDefenseConceptsLLC Why are you putting assault rifle in quotes?
Who is this Nicholas "washed up actor" Cage fake alike?
The speed and power shown during his martial arts demonstration is mind blowing! Maybe his feet should be taken so I no longer have fear of them?
He had to register his limbs as weapons for a CHP
As soon as he grabbed his wrist while pointing an imaginary gun, I knew he was lying
The ol Madea shooting stance
When martial arts came up and he began to show his amazing skills at twisting his own foot and lifting his hands to shoulder level... All I could hear in my head was Stuart from MadTV... "Look what I can do!"...
He was so drunk he will never remember this. I can't agree that progress was made.
nd as for "hearts and minds", I decided a while ago the shelve that notion. 2 to the chest and 1 to the head will be my version of hearts and minds if one of these woke mobs tries to fuck around and find out at my house.
Now I will try to succinctly explain the "why". I grew weary of seeing Stephen Crowder, James O'Keefe, Owen Schroder, Ben Shapiro, and every other conservative ask one of these leftist idiots (after being spat on by a dozen other leftists they tried to peacefully engage in discourse) ask that one question that leftist tards STILL can't give a solid answer to: WHAT IS AN ASSAULT RIFLE?
This leftist idiot's definition is one of "those" guns that allows you to kill everyone in 4 seconds, while he motions as if spraying and praying from his hip (big surprise).
Tl Dr: You never see an educated leftist spewing this Beto-speak because the .01% who bother to educate themselves NECESSARILY CHANGE THEIR OPINION DURING THE PROCESS OF LEARNING ABOUT IT. Keeping such tarded opinions intact after you learn "facts" takes a special kind of stupid.
This leads me to the conclusion that they don't care about facts and becoming educated. Which necessarily means they don't care about making meaningful positive change (for example lowering violent crime overall, not just deaths from metal bang sticks that are longer, but go bang similarly to the short ones). The next logical step forces me to ask "if they don't care about what they claim to, then... wut?
Being right, being victims, and having YOU to blame for their lack of whatever they feel they are lacking. And, try as we may, we will never be able to fill the massive void that would remain if we took victimhood away from them. We still do HAVE to take it away for the sake of us, our families, the country, God, and everyone else deserving of simple peace.
So until the "tolerant" left stops imitating fascists while displaying the absolute greatest show of 100% pure hypocrisy I have ever seen (little runts about small enough I could punt them, and absolutely would, running around trying to deny our free speech while claiming they are "anti" fascist... When the Ritalin and adderall begin to wear off and they can have a civil conversation... then maybe I'll take them out of my sight picture.
this guy was a nut
@@xjsman101 you got me thinking!...
I was preparing to hear "Judy Chop!!" because I'm sure he was a student of Diamond Dave's. 🤣🤣
I smell lies coming out from that old man mouth 🤣🤣the way he explain things what he have experienced in the past, and his point of view it’s irrelevant
Well its all about disarming the public . drugs are and have been illegal for years how is that going.
2nd amendment was to stop tyranny period not about hunting.
This guy reminds me of the "what's your name?" guy. He also seems to be your typical virtue signaling liberal who makes up stuff and uses strawman fallacies to make his point
When I saw his firearm grip, I cringed so hard that I got a good face workout. At this rate, my face muscles (whatever they're called) will be super strong in days😂
I'll give up my guns when,,, well NEVER !!!!!! THANK YOU
There is not such thing as an assault weapn. It is a made up term.
You are soooo right you pick up anything and hit any one that is assault weapon.
All weapons used in assaults' are assault weapons.
If the govt has it, I want it. If they don’t want me to have it, then they shouldn’t have either. It’s as simple as that.
Good point.
In a disarmed populace why would Law enforcement need guns?
Police state.
I would love to have an assault rifle, but where does one get their hands on a mint condition stg44 nowadays?
Class three license and a upwards 30k dollars
Saw one at rock island auction go for $22k about 6 months ago
Saw one for sale for $40,000
Oooo baby, that's gon cost you...
Ok am I allowed to laugh now that the “knowledge” this anti gun guy has is to “hold your breath” while shooting?😂😂
Absolutely.
This was great. Just subscribed from Pennsylvania.
We appreciate the comment! We're glad you enjoyed the video.
@@AppliedDefenseConceptsLLC Sent an email for you to consider if ever needed. I look forward to more content from you guys.
Damn I can’t imagine how many firearms are in that place at the same time and not a single round exited a barrel.. made me think guns don’t go off by itself.. WOW mind blowing hahhaha
100%
Offer to take them to the range and teach them to shoot. You'll be surprised how their minds change.
Absolutely. We have done this with many more left-leaning friends. Most of them change their mind within the first visit. Some, it takes a little more work. Be open to them and their hesitation and people will begin to see the light with firearm ownership.
Maybe not this guy though... I don't believe he'd pass the background mental section
I wonder what his mental stability is, some unstable people think all people are unstable and there for are dangerous
Indeed. I think it’s called “projection”. I can’t trust myself with a gun therefore I can’t trust you with one either.
@@lousimpson834 i think a lot of our politicians are unstable thus their crazy policies.
Thanks for all the comments on this video guys. We were surprised that it is JUST NOW getting views. The algorithm is a mystery.
I searched for this in honesty
youtube desperately tries to bury videos like this. they want to deplatform you.
Is it really a mystery though? Seems TH-cam doesn't want people to know the truth
@@Dr.Acula76 Yeah very true.
@@thethinkinggriesbach7600 I'm glad
There are two kinds of people. Ones who listen and ones who are just waiting to talk. This guy is just waiting to talk and not hearing anything they are saying..
This guy is so FOS about his “black belt”.
I have a black belt, got it at men's warehouse, matches my shoes.
Interesting story. When I made brown belt, sensei made a statement that I hadn't heard before. That was, that becoming a black belt, means that now, you are willing to learn. Till that point, I thought I was learning. It means that mentally, you are prepared to actually learn karate. There's a difference.
@Chris King correct. Up to that point, most people are just going through the motions.
I cringed and it hurt.
You think we would evolve out of sin.... there is his primary error in thinking.
Solid point.
Humans like to do bad things to others, unfortunately.
I think we have evolved to be better shooters.
Well I for one am glad that Fudd Nicolas Cage changed his mind.
Bruh....I cant unsee that
Dude was a joke who probably cant pass a mental background check himself. Couldnt even pay attention to the conversation and kept being really spacy and weird. He kept looking away as if he wasnt even listening or didnt even want to.
Yeah, he couldnt focus. Most likely had some things up with him. ADHD or a more severe disorder.
4:20 (lol) "I've shot 22" *uses thumb to shoot*. Yeah hes been around guns
Glad to see that there are people out there willing to talk. Conversation is the key to spreading the truth. When we blurt out our side, it won’t take root, but when we explain the truth patiently it can grab the attention needed to change the world. Well done!
Thank you. That was what I was hoping for. Hopefully more like this to come.
somewhere, a trailer park is missing it's Jim Lahey.
Bruh
That anti gun guy seemed like something was wrong with him lol, very odd dude, respect for you debating him so well
Thank you.
The guy showing his "blackbelt martial skills" was the crindgiest thing I've seen today.
2:38 “I sHot A bB gUn” guy tries not to laugh😂
I like how when he pretends to hold the 22 he looks more like hes playing a guitar
Mixed up his muscle memory
Personally, after watching that guy for this few minutes, I'm glad he doesn't own a gun. Just sayin'.
I am worried that they will want to take away my “assault” weapon, which is a sharp pointed stick! Actually in WW1 and WW2 bolt action rifles were the assault rifles. They will go after everything!
"Here's a special secret that I know but not even the military knows. When you aim you should hold your breath. That's why I was so good when I showed my wife how to shoot a BB gun."
That guys is a complete twat.
This guy never set foot in a dojo lol.
I dont know man. He seemed like he might have been a 14th degree black ops master and was just putting on a front.
Pretty much all anti gun arguments is “let’s just take the evil out of people”. Good luck with that I’ll keep my guns btw
that man is a reasonable person and listened to him and have a very productive conversation good on him and you
Thank you
It's amazing how much progress a civil conversation can make.
Good work fellas!
THIS is how a debate from both sides of the aisle is supposed to go. Sensible conversation on both sides
Appreciate the comment
@@AppliedDefenseConceptsLLC Thank you. I think people need to see more videos like this
OMG he’s a martial artist?😅😊😅😅I can stop laughing....😂😂😂🤣🤣
All of his conclusions are plagued by and grounded in emotions.
I respect both of the gentlemen in this debate because they both remained calm and went in with a non confrontational attitude! We need more people like that!
You get people to evolve, THEN ask me for my AR-15.. OK?
I'm still waiting for the evolution, myself
@@AppliedDefenseConceptsLLC I think we peaked in the 1950s. It's all down hill from here.
When the media gets you on this band wagon about assault weapons
"it's difficult to win an argument with a smart person, it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person."
100%
The way these people respect each other during this debate is awesome. The only way to change minds is to listen and respond intelligently to each point, without belittling the opposing viewpoint. Most anti-gunners simply do not know what they are talking about and need to be respectfully educated. Great job!
I've been homeschooled all my life and have been hunting all my life. I have never been close a firearm accident or murder. I don't want to be a criminal but if an officer tries to take my guns, I'm sorry but I'm going to use my guns to defend my guns.
They change the definition of "assault weapon" every other day.
This guy is living in another world all on his own. WOW
Also if you guys didnt see it in the description, here is a dude I arrested who was a FELON and talked about how easy it was to buy a gun. "Mind Blowing"
th-cam.com/video/6rA_PptHRV4G/w-d-xo.htmlun
" I hold my breath" 😂 okay ill laugh
This guy talking about how he knows martial arts then stands completely off balance 🤦🏼♂️
By definition assault rifle = a rifle used in an assault of 19 used in mass shootings 11 were rifles, how many AR 15s are responsibly owned and LEAGALLY used in the US. AR is armalite brand rifle,not a model. 2nd amendment we need to defend.
Drugs r bad mmmmmkayy
I wonder how high he was when we talked
He ain't on our side now! He is an obvious BETA! He just goes with the flow until he feels safe again and cuddling w his blankie and he WILL continue with his uniformed views and will never recognize the Historical past on the subject.
The way he grabbed his wrist to show how he shoots makes me think about how much experience he actually has
Old movie fudd advice from 1982, no doubt
He's not a peacemaker. He's a peace hoper. He has no ability to make peace. Only to enjoy the peace that is made by others.
Agreed. Peace is always hard won
“The government will never truly try and take our guns” flash to modern day and the past few years
This guy is stupid! We need to ban these fully semi-automatic assaults weapons and these AR-17s(which stands for assaults rifle) Also no hollow-tip armor piercings round and no high capacity clips (that has more rounds than a standard capacity)
th-cam.com/video/3bgUCb0FtNc/w-d-xo.html - Learn why people are protesting here
There are so many people,that if approached like this,would understand the 2nd amendment,and why it's so important,and a gun is no better than,or worse than,the person toting it
We appreciate that.
TH-cam hides video s if they dont like it what ive noticed
Jesus Christ saves FROM sin.
* Romans 3:23
* all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
* Heb 9: 27
* And as it IS appointed unto men once to die, but after this the JUDGEMENT. Yes YOU WILL BE JUDGED by a God that hates sin.
* Isaiah 64: 6
* But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
* Revelation 21: 8
* But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
* Romans 5: 8
* But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
* John 3: 16
* For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
* John 14: 6
* Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
* Romans 10: 9-10.
* That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
* For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
* Jesus said John 5: 24
* Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
* 1John 5: 10-13
* He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
* And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
* He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
* These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
* Ephesians 2: 8-9
* For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
* Not of works, lest any man should boast.
* Romans 8: 1
* There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
* 1 Corinthians 15: 3-4
* For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
* And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
* 2 Corinthians 5: 21
* For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him
*
Repent, trust Jesus, & live Holy
Actswayevangelism.com
Killed video 1/3 of the way through .. guy had issues
I wouldn’t be surprised if his experience with guns realistically ends at a BB gun. The pellet gun probably had too much power for him.
You will stop infringing on my rights ‘big brother’! Consequences come to those that cause communistic domestic terrorism in the U.S.A.
I like how that dude in the background slyly walks through the background with his pro Trump merchandise.
Being gentle and respectful and having facts to back up an argument or dispute goes a long long way! The minute you stiffen up and encroach on someone’s ideas or beliefs can shut them down and force them in the wrong direction almost instantly. Even if they’re not 💯 sure of their argument they will go defense and then you’ve lost them. Great job staying patient and persistent with facts and respect!! See it worked on this dude for a few minutes anyway. Now he’s the largest gun owner of semiautomatics in Virginia! Hahahhaha
There is a crazy in every crowd and they found one to interview. Listen to his answers. Lol
"I think that if every body was just nice and gentle then we wouldnt need guns" umm yeah but let's not operate on wishful thinking and hypothetical. The world is a cruel and violent place.
You can melt down every weapons in the world but you cannot get rid of evil.
And people will STILL find a way to kill one another.
I'll say what everyone is thinking but doesn't want to say out loud. The A R 15 is what is most likely to be our go to firearm when we need to overthrow overthrow a unjust government
unjust government
I'll take it further. You shouldn't need a background check or the government's permission to access you rights
"I've got a black belt in martial arts" Probably trained with Elvis' Karate Master.
Someday the Devil may appear at your doorstep.
Odds are he won’t.
But, if and when he does show up it’s best to be prepared for worst case scenario instead of wishing in those last moments that you hadn’t been so shortsighted and passive.
That Dude with the camo mitts/gloves talking about how he's "all for background checks" is a bigger Fudd than the dude with the sign, who is just ignorant.
This whole protest is a perfect example of how an armed society is a polite society. No one is going to go cause trouble and try to hurt, rob, or rape people when almost everyone in that area is armed and perfectly capable of eliminating them as a threat....