China’s latest nuclear attack subs are not a joke anymore.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • ✅ Install Raid for Free Mobile and PC: clik.cc/B9DKN and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion Drake 🎉 Log into the game for 7 days between now and July 24th and get a free legendary champion Artak
    💥Check out Raid’s new limited animated series Call of the Arbiter here: • RAID: Call of the Arbi...
    For the longest time, literally since the 1970s, Chinese nuclear fuel powered submarines have been regarded as a joke by a lot of western militaries. Today, China seems to have started building another subvariant of its 093 nuke attack subs. And this time around, it seems its capabilities are getting fairly close to US ones. This video will try to shed a bit more light on it all.
    US Air Force is losing its tech edge (over China)
    • US Air Force is losing...
    Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestini...
    If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
    More here: / binkov​
    You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
    Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
    Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
    Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
    Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com

ความคิดเห็น • 2.2K

  • @Binkov
    @Binkov  ปีที่แล้ว +25

    ✅ Install Raid for Free Mobile and PC: clik.cc/B9DKN and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion Drake 🎉 Log into the game for 7 days between now and July 24th and get a free legendary champion Artak
    💥Check out Raid’s new limited animated series Call of the Arbiter here: th-cam.com/video/H32dvyCVkfk/w-d-xo.html&pp=iAQB

    • @RazorM97
      @RazorM97 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joe Biden sending that nuclear sub towards south korea to deter china aged fine like wine

    • @waitingforanalibi2224
      @waitingforanalibi2224 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is NOT a pump jet.

    • @donniebrookins6215
      @donniebrookins6215 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chinese junk will sink as fast

    • @jhrusa8125
      @jhrusa8125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How would you know? Is chinese subs or a bigger joke Then your opinions. China is a dying nation with bad pegeography.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait ปีที่แล้ว

      Binkov the first Pump Jet was trialed on HMS Churchill before it was fitted on the Swiftsure Class ( all but the lead boat of that class ) so UK subs used Pump Jet propulsion since mid 70s before the US also choose a similar configuration.

  • @J_X999
    @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    China's military isn't better than the US, but it's not a paper tiger.
    This comment basically sums up the inevitable war in Binkov's comment sections.

    • @joseolivarra7791
      @joseolivarra7791 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chinese soldier dont even have body armor crucial in saving a soldiers life china dont care because they can replace their losses by just throwing bodies at the problem

    • @AJPMUSIC_OFFICIAL
      @AJPMUSIC_OFFICIAL ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the thing is can China kill enough Americans and destroy enough equipment to make the US cease with a conflict in the area? No one expects Chinese paratroopers jumping into California. Post gulf war 1 the US expects minor casualties and losses in a war. Could the US populus stomatch losing a carrier with 5000 hands? China has the advantage that it can to a degree hide the impact of loses from its people and while the one child policy has doomed future population numbers they still have bodies to throw at problems. Hopefully it will never happen anyway

    • @prasanth2601
      @prasanth2601 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fair point. Eventually everything comes down to tech superiority and we all know who is pioneer in this area

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@prasanth2601 A technological edge might not be enough for the US. Like Binkov said, China is catching up unprecedentedly.

    • @prasanth2601
      @prasanth2601 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@J_X999 The thing is China is playing catch up. A country can catch up other but outperforming is a big issue.
      Not to mention much of US tech is classified.

  • @tommarney1561
    @tommarney1561 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Binkov noted in his earlier video about the threat of Russian subs to American aircraft carriers that the Russian subs didn't have to be better than or even equal to US subs. They just had to be good enough to avoid detection. Now it appears that the Chinese have reached that point, and they'll be building a lot more subs than the Russians.

    • @Planet.Xplor3r
      @Planet.Xplor3r ปีที่แล้ว

      @Atheos B. Sapien (Ubi dubium ibi liberatas) I doubt that fucking Portugal will be the decisive factor against China. I do hope we never find out in the real world though.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      BUT SIR DO U KNOW MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 MEANWHILE IN CHINA PEOPLE STILL RIDE RICKSHAW EVERYWHERE AND THEY ALSO POOR DONT HAVE CAR . THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳

    • @mustafatariq1909
      @mustafatariq1909 ปีที่แล้ว

      @atheos19 yeah but in all reality that’s a select few European countries, some other American allies, since most don’t even have expeditionary forces let alone a submarine force capable of anything but a defensive coastal stance.

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @atheos19 You really think the world is going to war with China because the US says so? Heck, I will be surprise if half of Europe will go to war with China on the behest of the US. China is the biggest trading partner with more than 120 countries in the world, and most of the rest have China either its 2nd or 3rd biggest trading partner. To go to war with China is to literally destroy yourself.
      So in the event of a conflict in west Pacific, the US might be the one who find itself alone.

  • @keli4068
    @keli4068 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    When you see China is building 4/5/6 SSN a year,you will know Chinese SSN is as good as US's

    • @wilgoos63
      @wilgoos63 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      That was the pattern we saw with their destroyers and frigates so I think you make a very reasonable point.

    • @theemperorofmankind3739
      @theemperorofmankind3739 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I will add the caveat that they do not need to be as good. But when they feel their equipment is good enough to be deemed as a near peer. Even if they are about 80% as good that is still wheere I think they would push production. I say this as they would like to use a number of this equipment for training and even development.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      BUT SIR DO U KNOW MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 MEANWHILE IN CHINA PEOPLE STILL RIDE RICKSHAW EVERYWHERE AND THEY ALSO POOR DONT HAVE CAR . THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳

    • @wilgoos63
      @wilgoos63 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@theemperorofmankind3739 Exactly, building the most advanced shiniest piece of equipment doesn't win you the war necessarily, go ask the Germans about that. Kinda fascinating is that after defeating the Germans the US then starts copying the German procurment strategy.

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wilgoos63 huh...never thought about that. Good point!

  • @sjv9147s
    @sjv9147s ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Didn't the nuclear Seawolf class sub stubbed it's nose somewhere near Taiwan, had to surface and limped all the way back to Hawaii for repairs?

  • @PvtSchlock
    @PvtSchlock ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love getting old; I still can't help thinking that the Los Angeles class is "new".

    • @Plaprad
      @Plaprad ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember playing 688 on my old 486 as a kid. The new, high tech Los Angeles class was amazing and awesome... And that was over thirty years ago.
      Getting old sucks.

  • @stone1227
    @stone1227 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    America can't detect a Chinese balloon, let alone a Chinese sub

    • @AChannelThatDoesNothing
      @AChannelThatDoesNothing ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What do you mean? It was detected.

    • @blackmetalcumbia
      @blackmetalcumbia ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AChannelThatDoesNothing but not stopped until too late. chinese gov already with the pictures

    • @AChannelThatDoesNothing
      @AChannelThatDoesNothing ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@blackmetalcumbia Actually the US was able to block the camera on the balloon while spying on it back as the balloon went across the US.

    • @blackmetalcumbia
      @blackmetalcumbia ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AChannelThatDoesNothing sensor and gps not only photos. you block the lens but what about the chip and other shit. was too late just accept it and move on mate.

    • @OryxAU
      @OryxAU ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@blackmetalcumbia Not really. Yeah we weren't looking for it through radar, but once we did find it we didn't immediately destroy it, we had no idea where it was from, what it was, who it belonged to, or if it was even safe to shoot down. Once we did know and it was safely away from any risky areas we did shoot it down, and then we shot down other ones when we knew what they were. This is exactly the approach that should be taken.

  • @vorlonzevatron7142
    @vorlonzevatron7142 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    There is a youtube video detailing how China hunted one of the three Sea wolf class submarine which was rammed head on by a unmanned submarine.

    • @jameslum8822
      @jameslum8822 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you access to the link?

    • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
      @irritatedanglosaxon1705 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @jameslum8822 search roywalker, and also how PLA wiped out US made terrorists in Mindanao, Phillipines only in 1 week

    • @vorlonzevatron7142
      @vorlonzevatron7142 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jameslum8822 th-cam.com/video/VeJLwUfLcEU/w-d-xo.html

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@irritatedanglosaxon1705 ?? But is it true or fiction though?

  • @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278
    @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I remember back in 2012 or was 2013 when the pacific fleet get a shock of reality when that chinese sub captain decided to emerge at full speed 800 meters away from US carrier.

    • @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278
      @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The media didn’t exposed that much. Although I wonder how many subs and implements they’ve done after all 10 years from now many things changed

    • @Rumtrinker
      @Rumtrinker ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the Chinese captain can navigate whatever he wants but is clear they had him located. if the US submarines heard him spinning up torpedoes we would hear about a accident on a Chinese boat

    • @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278
      @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Rumtrinker I will find the youtube link. the pacific fleet wasn't expecting but np.I will gladly find it sooner or later.

    • @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278
      @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rumtrinker th-cam.com/video/40zVLcL5rYE/w-d-xo.html

    • @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278
      @rafaeloreirorodriguez5278 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Rumtrinker see found it the link althought it was a russian submarine model with chinese crew. To bad is the edited version, the original was more exciting.

  • @raymondtay3532
    @raymondtay3532 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Well done China Super advanced powerful Submarine in the world .❤❤💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤

  • @Strykenine
    @Strykenine ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The US has been building Virginia Class boats for twenty years. I would hope that they're at least getting close so that all of the Sinophiles something to talk about on Quora.

    • @wilgoos63
      @wilgoos63 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The point is that 20 years ago Chinese nuclear subs were about 40 years orso behind in technology. Nowadays they are reaching parity. Combine that with a massive edge over the US in production capacity and you have a real threat.
      Subs that are not as good but close in performance and available in large numbers and concentrated in one theater.

    • @Jkl62200
      @Jkl62200 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quora is Infested with Indian hindu nationalists and extremists.

  • @jaredthehawk3870
    @jaredthehawk3870 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The 093 "Shang" class is about on par with an old Victor III in terms of capabilities.

  • @swisstestpilot
    @swisstestpilot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Mr. Binkov and (Mrs?) Binkov enjoy your Holidays in Uberslavia, I look forward to seeing new and always interesting Videos from you and your team after that. ;-)

  • @lvxmagick9560
    @lvxmagick9560 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just one thing... Its still made in china.

  • @robertfrost1683
    @robertfrost1683 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Countries play " Gamesmanship" just like playing " poker".. Always build up your opponent and talking down your strengths. All the while holding aces and kings in your hand. They when the hand is called - you win.

  • @Allen667sjja
    @Allen667sjja ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where is Sean Connery when you need him lol

  • @defencebangladesh4068
    @defencebangladesh4068 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Grabbing some popcorn...
    The comment section would be entertaining.

  • @History_Coffee
    @History_Coffee ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You want crab rangoon? You get nuclear missiles!

  • @stone1227
    @stone1227 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When ppl are talking about submarines, F35 joins the chat

  • @熊掌波清波
    @熊掌波清波 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have to say it is a wild imagination to make such a claim based on so little information...
    What i know here is that what things look like are more important than what they really are. We are educated to compete rather than cooperate with each other from school. There are factions playing gaming and politics in almost every company I worked for. The truth of teamwork projects like Submarines and aircrafts maybe more than meet the eye with this culture.

  • @Dorgon_HetuAla
    @Dorgon_HetuAla ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "China's nuclear submarines sail slower than whales," a Chinese media report said.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When Chinese media says something negative about China, you lap it up like a dog

  • @cadavisiii
    @cadavisiii ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yo, Binkov, just curious, legit question, uhh for production, how many Binkov puppets do you have? What are they insured for? How much is the original appraised for? Say that a person with great will dug out the last remaining Binkov puppets from the nuclear fallout. What could such a man barter for in that new age?

  • @ChipChat1493
    @ChipChat1493 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Recently the submersible Titan imploded at somewhere from sealevel to 3000 plus metres. China has built submersible reaching more than 10000 metres in depth. That speaks alot about their ability to build underwater sea borne equipment like submarines.

    • @piecharb.1343
      @piecharb.1343 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Your comparing the largest country in the world to an egomaniacs delusional company. Also it’s not like going past 10000 meters hasn’t been done before just ask James Cameron

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@piecharb.1343
      They did it and are selling it dude....just Google. 😂😂

  • @MorganBrown
    @MorganBrown ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Chinese like to build stuff

  • @tritium1998
    @tritium1998 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    US subs in use have been the same classes for decades and many of them don't have stealthy sails, pump jet propellors, and modern electronics. Other Chinese sub types are ignored here.

  • @rafail2303
    @rafail2303 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you continue doing VS videos or at leat revisit older ones?
    Time travel videos would also be OK

  • @dand4075
    @dand4075 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cut to the chase, who's ahead now.

  • @dunnowy123
    @dunnowy123 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    American copium is super strong here. Simultaneously, China is a near peer competitor that the US takes pretty seriously, yet it also hopelessly inept and backwards (according to keyboard generals). It's a country with some of the best scientists, engineers, and mathematicians, a large industrial base, the will to modernize, but feelings on superiority mean they can't POSSIBLY come close to us.

    • @akiraraiku
      @akiraraiku ปีที่แล้ว +5

      How can they simultaneously be a growing threat with a menacing military and be joked about having shitty non working gear that just does parades and an army that is totally unable to fight.
      I'd also wager that like in finance, past behaviour is not a guarantee for future behaviour. China may have been times and times again bad in military matters, doesn't mean that they are fated to remain such for ever.

    • @2200calle
      @2200calle ปีที่แล้ว +4

      0.5 social credit has been added to your account

    • @akiraraiku
      @akiraraiku ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@2200calle John Chena likes your comment

    • @endyender1703
      @endyender1703 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@akiraraiku their newest aircraft carrier (still in drydock being built) has cracks in it already. That doesn't bode well. It's well known at this point that the materials they use are woefully inadequate. Let's take the AK-47 for example. A Russian and Soviet AK-47 out performs a Chinese AK-47 every time. The buildings they make barely last 30 years. They also haven't fought a war since they had their asses kicked in Vietnam. Not to mention their economy is spiraling out of control.
      This "near peer" power is only such so that we can keep our defense spending up. If the our government actually admitted how woefully unprepared the Chinese are for any combat, they'd have to decrease our defense budget, and they can't do that.

    • @keitht24
      @keitht24 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here's what you fail to comprehend. China isn't catching up to the U.S. militarily. They're simply modernizing their obsolete military equipment. The problem with this is that China's military doesn't have any field experience with this new weaponry & they're severely lacking in logistical infrastructure & the ability to deploy this new military hardware overseas. Despite all this modernization, China's military capabilities are still only regional. In any way where we don't go straight to nukes. The U.S. can easily destroy China's navy & cut off the Chinese economy from overseas resources.

  • @arzaantsaqib3655
    @arzaantsaqib3655 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Feels weird being this early

  • @actonman7291
    @actonman7291 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Would the American Fleet be sunk by the Chinese?

    • @pabcu2507
      @pabcu2507 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Only if China has jinpinium

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hear me out, if we sell them enough Panda Express... they might just sink by themselves

    • @paulsteaven
      @paulsteaven ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@pabcu2507 finally! A material to surpass the Stalinium thru IP theft.

  • @AC_702
    @AC_702 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like the sail has some similarity to Virginia class

  • @piotrd.4850
    @piotrd.4850 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If China has and operates proficiently subs that are equivalent of 688I or late proj.971 it will be challenge enough.

  • @YenMielDELAPAZ
    @YenMielDELAPAZ ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Binkov just wonder if you are interested in making video about serbia?

  • @RayRay-uw6ms
    @RayRay-uw6ms ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Guyz I'm chinese
    Dont believe this video
    Our army is noob
    No worry ok?
    No worry!

    • @SpruceWood-NEG
      @SpruceWood-NEG ปีที่แล้ว +7

      054=fishing boat, 052=trawler, 055=large trawler, 003=fishing boat with processing capacity. Chinese submarine=pickled Chinese cabbage fish.

    • @didyoumissedmegobareatersk2204
      @didyoumissedmegobareatersk2204 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah just another neighbour usa thinks twice before bullying

    • @Kevin-tv9rv
      @Kevin-tv9rv ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SpruceWood-NEGIndian troll

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do you pajjeets and amerimutts think this is going to accomplish😏?

    • @pixxel5392
      @pixxel5392 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NeostormXLMAX mohmadiya mullas with any intellectual knowledge speaking of others 😂😂

  • @needed2bleed
    @needed2bleed ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks!

  • @troysandlin9855
    @troysandlin9855 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The Chinese may have a sub that’s the equivalent of a block 1 Virginia class sub (I doubt it’s even close but who knows)which was put into commission 20 years ago. The block 5 Virginia class SSN Arizona is the newest variation and is 20 years more advanced than the first. Soon the Americans will be building the SSN(X) next generation attack sub to replace the Virginia class subs. China is making progress (as fast as they can steal or copy American and Russian technology), but is at least 20 years behind on all aspects of warfare equipment, including stealth fighters, tanks, drones and missiles (yeah, everyone knows about chinas advanced missiles, the US military will be the first to tell everyone how advanced they’re, it keeps Congress scared enough to keep funding all the secret missile technology the military is and has developed. Same reason we “loose” every time we have mock war games vs China or Russia).

  • @AddyEspresso
    @AddyEspresso 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These subs aged like milk

  • @mohamadfaezbaik2369
    @mohamadfaezbaik2369 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THE BATTLE OF CIANJING

  • @knickebien1966
    @knickebien1966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoy Uberslavia!

  • @thomasferrari6465
    @thomasferrari6465 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It also you mean more stolen technology

    • @altergreenhorn
      @altergreenhorn ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You mean like the US? Hint for you "operation paperclip"

    • @psl7360
      @psl7360 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      any equipment or technology better than your worshipped kind must be stolen or copied, soon your world's innovative mind will stalled soon.

  • @Terryray123
    @Terryray123 ปีที่แล้ว

    NAMs have been out for cooks/CSs/92Gs making pre-made cooks for an O-10.
    Now, this is bullshit!

  • @Olive-jb9ct
    @Olive-jb9ct ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ahhh they still are …😂😂😂😂 Putin had a garage sale 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @taiwanstillisntacountry
    @taiwanstillisntacountry ปีที่แล้ว +15

    31,2T debts : the "richest","mightiest", country of the world?
    Sure is the most addicted, homeless, indebted, bragging country of the world 😂😂😂😂

    • @ingen5161
      @ingen5161 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did you get your +15 social Credit store now commie? 😂

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did you got your food-stamps?
      Did you got your fentanyl pills?
      Did you......?
      Oh wait, are you a scammer from scam-center Mumbai?
      Have asked your supervisor for payments in Chinese ¥uan?
      No1 accepts rupy-rupy anymore, not even the Russian Federation.
      😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
      Glory to the British-Raj

    • @mcul3474
      @mcul3474 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is it like living in West Taiwan?

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How is it to live in the British-Raj?
      Where 200m Dalits live.
      Where you still uses the caste-system.
      Where 20% is illiterate.
      Where 45% only has elementary school education.
      Where 200m have hunger everyday.
      Which is ranked 107th on the hunger-index of only 116 countries.
      Where they brag, dream, envy, lie, moan, whine and cry everyday for being jealous of the real superpower, the People's Republic of China?
      And where 50% of all iPhones made are defaults?😁😁😁😁😁

    • @mikehygj9221
      @mikehygj9221 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indian Military pummeled Chinese BITCHES TO DEATH in da mountains 🤣😂👌🏻

  • @musa7010
    @musa7010 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    All those ridiculing Chinese here please Google "Fat Leonard"😮

  • @dkearney5951
    @dkearney5951 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    enjoy all the vacas

  • @xinyisuoshu
    @xinyisuoshu ปีที่แล้ว +27

    American freedom and democracy and American president are the biggest jokes in the world.

    • @loadingnewads
      @loadingnewads ปีที่แล้ว +6

      at least US should control the drugs, those trash are killing people

    • @potatonoodlebear8035
      @potatonoodlebear8035 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@loadingnewads Absolutely, drugs are destroying families and killing people on the streets.

    • @MafizMd-s8x
      @MafizMd-s8x ปีที่แล้ว

      No American Freedom and Democracy aren’t any jokes but the president is

    • @JM-gj7de
      @JM-gj7de ปีที่แล้ว

      Yah, I'm sure the Chinese system is much better, right?

    • @loadingnewads
      @loadingnewads ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JM-gj7de Chinese system is much much better in serving the nation
      Just pay some attention to how China catches up western nations in 30 years and surpass them in multiple areas
      This is the reason why China is so powerful now

  • @casbot71
    @casbot71 ปีที่แล้ว +479

    The comments section should be fun.

    • @casbot71
      @casbot71 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      Remember that everyone who disagrees with _you_ is a bot or a paid troll.

    • @fakenamejones4254
      @fakenamejones4254 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Are you a bot? Solve a paradox to prove your humanity!

    • @casbot71
      @casbot71 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      ​@Fake Name Jones I am a bot, and I _always_ lie ...

    • @KonradvonHotzendorf
      @KonradvonHotzendorf ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I want some action before he disables the comments 😊

    • @rifat6913
      @rifat6913 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Man i hate this comment section.

  • @realdreamerschangetheworld7470
    @realdreamerschangetheworld7470 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    As much fun as we poke... Nuclear subs were never a joke, to be fair

    • @paulsteaven
      @paulsteaven ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Agree. No matter how noisy or quiet nuclear subs are, they're still better than most conventional weapons.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      BUT SIR DO U KNOW MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 MEANWHILE IN CHINA PEOPLE STILL RIDE RICKSHAW EVERYWHERE AND THEY ALSO POOR DONT HAVE CAR . THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳

    • @captspeedy1899
      @captspeedy1899 ปีที่แล้ว

      why are you a dog

  • @OleDiaBole
    @OleDiaBole ปีที่แล้ว +13

    And here come legions of ignorants thinking you can copy super-complicated systems by copying their general shape.

  • @HellopeepsStavros
    @HellopeepsStavros ปีที่แล้ว +18

    As a metallurgist I spent quite a lot of time explaining to manufacturing that inclusions in the metal were why components fractured. I am sure those subs will be fine.

    • @wilgoos63
      @wilgoos63 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean it is not like submarine hulls get exposed to high pressures right?

    • @HellopeepsStavros
      @HellopeepsStavros ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wilgoos63 Those hulls are welded wrought high strength steel. Its their casting, dirty cheep steel. Needle type inclusions close to the surface weaken the part lowering its strength and fatigue resistence. We buy this steel to reduce production costs. Next thing you know the part is breaking. Whether or not this has extended to the sub parts is unknown. One has just been lost by the titanic wreck. When they are compromised and start sinking they implode. This has happened to a US sub when the failed to maintain it properly to save money. Bits of sub were all over the ocean floor.

    • @wilgoos63
      @wilgoos63 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HellopeepsStavros My message was intended sarcastically, sorry if that didnt come across properly.
      Also, thanks for your explanation. That is kinda what I was thinking, microscopic inclusions can do really really bad things with the structural integrity of materials. I am not a metalurhgist but a geologist, so not a complete stranger to microscopic crystaline structrures and what you said 100% jives with the way i understand these things to work.

    • @HellopeepsStavros
      @HellopeepsStavros ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wilgoos63 As a geologist have you had to deal with young earth creationists ? Ken Ham built "the arc encounter" to show the world that everything living was pushed onto a single boat. Have you dated rocks with fossils using various isotope ratio tests ? How often had you had rows with Christians ? Any funny stories ?

    • @yojimbo3681
      @yojimbo3681 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right, because you know what kind of quality steel they use. /sarcasm

  • @rs-dp6pr
    @rs-dp6pr ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Heard that a US submarine was so stealthy, it ran itself into a mountain recently?

    • @likh008
      @likh008 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      because that is a stealth mountain :p

    • @lengthao8424
      @lengthao8424 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      China will destroy the US in China backyard period.......!!!!!!!!! China hunting the US submarines just fishing these day........!!!!!!!!!

    • @psl7360
      @psl7360 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes because the sea coral cannot see or sense it.

    • @icebaby6714
      @icebaby6714 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The worst part is it will take until 2026 the earliest to get it repaired while the damage is not that severe...this kind of speed will fail the US navy when a war breaks out between China and the US in Taiwan Strait, as you know Chinese can get their damaged warships fixed in weeks.

    • @ellashy6539
      @ellashy6539 ปีที่แล้ว

      or the sub stuck in a rock in the south china sea oops 🤣🤣

  • @TheNinjaMarmot
    @TheNinjaMarmot ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The worst thing you can do is underestimate the enemy.

    • @AgentSmith911
      @AgentSmith911 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't like China (or not China, but their government) and I could make fun of their submarine force after they recently allegedly lost a sub with 55 casualties, but if they decide to invade Taiwan, their silent submarines are the most dangerous unit used to keep foreign surface ships away from the conflict zone.

    • @pixxel5392
      @pixxel5392 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AgentSmith91155 wuam0s are in deep stinking pollution filled chimao ovean as we speak😂

  • @MorbidEel
    @MorbidEel ปีที่แล้ว +9

    but it would make sense to lie about being unable to detect them. When it comes to military tech it is safe to assume everyone is lying. When you are trying to recruit you will talk about how awesome you are. When you asking for budget on the next toy you stress how close your opponents are.

  • @johnsmith1953x
    @johnsmith1953x ปีที่แล้ว +17

    *THE* best channel on Asian Navy's (like China's) is "Eurasia Naval Insight".
    Really, REALLY excellent channel!

    • @mrprodigy7143
      @mrprodigy7143 ปีที่แล้ว

      My hat might be one of the most bias channels on youtube

    • @therocinante3443
      @therocinante3443 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah a really really excellent ccp propaganda channel

    • @rarescevei8268
      @rarescevei8268 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@therocinante3443So it is propaganda, even though he has made many videos that would, by your logic, be anti chinese and anti russian. It seems to me like you call whatever you dont like propaganda, but you call whatever you like facts.

  • @user-qf6yt3id3w
    @user-qf6yt3id3w ปีที่แล้ว +8

    China is clearly working up to the point it has nuclear parity with the US. It's not so much about warhead counts, more like SLBM survivability and having warheads that could plausibly get through US missile defences. This is because they're going to invade Taiwan know the US basically has to fight them because it can't lose access to TSMC or Asian manufacturing. China also has a covert but fairly obvious deal with Russia. I expect that Ukraine will gradually escalate into an open Russia/NATO war and then China will invade Taiwan. Both hope that dividing US forces between Europe and the Pacific and the dubious stability of the US regime and economy will let them win. This is, of course, an absolutely insane plan and will lead to nuclear war. And of course the US is not blameless in this. It forced a coup in Ukraine and pushed Russia into the China camp rather than trying to have Russia anti Chinese but not fully aligned to the West, analogous to the way post Sino-Soviet split China was anti USSR but not fully aligned with the West. In a three power world system it is very, very important to make sure you're in the block of two, not the isolated single power. Instead the US plushed Russia into an alliance with China and has bullied even Western European states like Germany by blowing up Nordstream. This was incredibly stupid. Not as dumb as Russia and China copying the WW2 Axis idea of deciding to take on the West knowing that 1) The West has nukes and 2) It will probably use them rather than lose Taiwan. And even ignoring Taiwan it's hard to see any outcome over Ukraine that doesn't end with a direct NATO/Russia confrontation.
    As bad an idea as it obviously is I think the US, Russia and China all see a war coming.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 ปีที่แล้ว

      The US won't trade Washington for Taipei
      Every war the US gets itself involved in has never posed an existential threat to the survival of the US. Getting into a nuclear exchange is existential for the US. and you dont sacrifice the king for a pawn.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      BUT SIR DO U KNOW MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 MEANWHILE IN CHINA PEOPLE STILL RIDE RICKSHAW EVERYWHERE AND THEY ALSO POOR DONT HAVE CAR . THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao if anything the west has more to lose in a nuclear war, you are right in some part but still wrong, russia and chinas nukes combined outnumbers american and european nukes by far, and a much higher population count, this isnt germany in ww2 when they are out numbered 1 to 6

  • @thanasisrks4944
    @thanasisrks4944 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Copium comments incoming!

  • @jtjr26
    @jtjr26 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The US generally does not talk about the technological capabilities of its submarine fleet publically. I wonder if comments made by US Navy personell about the closing technological gap with Rissian and Chinese equipment are actually true. To be sure China and Russia are doing all they can to close any technological gap in their hardware but at the same time the US is starting to build a new class of submarine and you can bet your bottom dollar they will incorporate every technological innovation they have from the latest flight of Virginia Class subs, plus some more advanced elements new to that class. Were the comments made by US naval personnel the truth or is this just intended to be negative enough to maintain or accelerate US Navy funding in budget allocations?

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It reminds me of the "bomber gap" and other panics the Pentagon has pushed during the Cold War. Good way to get more funding.

  • @The136th
    @The136th ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When are you gonna talk about Chinese destroyers? 055 and 052D?

  • @diner126
    @diner126 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There are very few naval battles that can be used as a reference. There have been no submarine battles and aircraft carrier battles with similar technical levels for decades, so most of them can only be speculated based on tonnage parameters and historical experience. China's shipbuilding industry accounts for one-third of the world, and its technical capabilities and quality are unquestionable. It's just that building submarines is a completely different concept from building ordinary warships. I look forward to more information

    • @diner126
      @diner126 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @atheos19 China's completely independently manufactured manned space station has been in operation for more than a year. Airbus aircraft are also assembled in China. Large cruise ships, Tesla and Apple mobile phones are also made in China. In these areas with the highest quality requirements, Chinese products The quality is reliable. Blind slander does not help to understand each other

    • @diner126
      @diner126 ปีที่แล้ว

      @atheos19 So where is your point? If the imitation thing can go to space, then any other country can build a space station

  • @MillionTube
    @MillionTube ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I saw the latest battle ship in china with broken haul and cracked surface, but I don't know if it true or not if china do tofu building they might do tofu sub

    • @prastagus3
      @prastagus3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      CSIS just refute this absurd rumor

    • @theguy8412
      @theguy8412 ปีที่แล้ว

      stop eating propaganda

    • @penskepc2374
      @penskepc2374 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@prastagus3China builds garbage, accept reality 😂

    • @penskepc2374
      @penskepc2374 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@theguy8412the irony of someone dumb enough to gobble Chinese propaganda saying that 😂

    • @MillionTube
      @MillionTube ปีที่แล้ว

      @@prastagus3 Send me the link to show me evidence

  • @KirbyZhang
    @KirbyZhang ปีที่แล้ว +7

    china doesn't have good submarine bases, no open access to deep water. it first needs a lot of surface ships to provide cover for its submarines.

    • @chongkt6469
      @chongkt6469 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes. Don't bother with them!

    • @walhdamaskus2408
      @walhdamaskus2408 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kirby Zhang is a new Gordon Chang. 😂

    • @shockme156
      @shockme156 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      say that to the Chinese cellphone that you use 24 hours non-stop

  • @TheGreatAdmiral
    @TheGreatAdmiral ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "haha US navy joke" - increasingly sweaty British admiral (1898)

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Lots of 12 year olds who have no fucking clue what they’re saying here😂

  • @Goober_____
    @Goober_____ ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Annnd here come all the angry Americans.

    • @Goober_____
      @Goober_____ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @atheos19 why is it wrong if someone is to support a different country’s ideals? Personally I still think the US military is capable but people keep thinking it can never fail which I think is very naïve

  • @Lukeclout
    @Lukeclout ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Russian designers from the Malakhit and Rubin designers were hired as consultants for latter variants of the Type 093 and upcoming Type 095 SSNs
    The type 095 will likely share many features from the upcoming Russian Project 545, which is based on a simpler , more modular and economic version of the Yasen-M Class boats. Since the Yasen-M is very near peer to the Virginia and Sea Wolf Classes - its a huge leap forwards for China

  • @davidzanders2887
    @davidzanders2887 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wow, China is building submarines as good as USA built 30-40 years ago.

    • @uzziake
      @uzziake ปีที่แล้ว +9

      😂😂 coping hard

    • @rahjah6958
      @rahjah6958 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try 100-200 years

    • @Jkl62200
      @Jkl62200 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@rahjah6958 jealous Endian bot

    • @downtomars6268
      @downtomars6268 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jkl62200 Endian can't even make a proper copy of a bridge, railway, and road without total failure.

  • @prasanth2601
    @prasanth2601 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    US have soo much experience in this field. They still have the technological edge against it's adversaries. Ofc chinese aren't to be taken lightly. Only the day their subs can effectively evade US radars in guam, Hawaii and sail all the way upto west coast then they become a real threat to Us military.
    I wonder whether china can detect a US SSN when it sails in it's backyard.

    • @SaviOr747
      @SaviOr747 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      US ofc still has the edge ( and probably will have it also in the future), Chinese Subs dont need to make all the way to the west coast to threaten the US. If its in a war against Taiwan scenario, its absolutly enough to intercept US convoys before they reach the west pacific.

    • @akiraraiku
      @akiraraiku ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The US is not universally better at everything. A sector that the US has underinvested for a long time in is ASV, to the point where US frigates can't even keep track of russian submarines in the medditerean, they need to get french and italian help to do that.

    • @SaviOr747
      @SaviOr747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@akiraraiku I'm not so much into ASW , but i imagine detecting subs in the med awful to pull of. Must be the sea with most noise pullution in the world. Its no wonder that France and Italy are superior at their own doorstep, with all that systems to monitor refugee boats.

    • @jwolf4948
      @jwolf4948 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akiraraiku How do I know you have no clue what you are talking about? The fact that you said ASV instead of ASW and then said US Frigates... The US has zero frigate class vessels commissioned. The last one in the Navy was USS Simpson which was decommissioned on 29 Sept. 2015. Plus I agree with SaviOr747, that is one of the most difficult places to keep track of vessels. Every northern European and Atlantic Ocean side nation in Either North or South America have the majority of their imports and exports go through the Mediterranean.

  • @RichardsMiscCorner
    @RichardsMiscCorner หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've heard that before that USN had to do post sound recording and determined after the fact that they were followed by Chinese subs. seems the comment section doesn't understand the significance of that. it means that Chinese subs have been playing cat and mouse with the US navy and not losing that game. that's a dramatic chance in 20 years time. 20 years ago the Chinese subs were laughable.

  • @paulsteaven
    @paulsteaven ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Want some 🍿🍿🍿 while reading the comment section?

  • @fortunatowenceslao5340
    @fortunatowenceslao5340 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    USA will sunk under the bottom with its $31 trillion humongous debt and still getting in more debt😂😂😂

    • @SpeedDaemon3
      @SpeedDaemon3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      USA can just print money, China on the other hand, they do have a real debt problem that their party tries to keep under the rug...

    • @rexcarolus5874
      @rexcarolus5874 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂Kina har en högre skuldsättning än USA

  • @Schaelpy
    @Schaelpy ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Free Taiwan 🇹🇼

    • @poat3453
      @poat3453 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China number one

    • @downtomars6268
      @downtomars6268 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Scary that the USA said it would blow up Taiwan.

    • @parveskoyes9937
      @parveskoyes9937 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@downtomars6268Really? I mean what benefit will America get from Nuking Taiwan?

    • @kakakiri2601
      @kakakiri2601 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about free Palestine?

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims ปีที่แล้ว +4

    0:28 The Chinese have jumping submarines?! Yeah, we’re boned

  • @neuman35
    @neuman35 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fairly close to U.S. Subs in the 1970's? Give me a F'ing break....

  • @hitmusicworldwide
    @hitmusicworldwide ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The publicly available specifications for the resolution of military satellite images is 25 cm. That's what they are letting us know. Donald Trump accidentally revealed in 2019 that USA 224 has a resolution of at least 10 cm if not better.

  • @peterpanini96
    @peterpanini96 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If chinese subs are as stealthy as their balloons America is doomed... 💪

    • @nottodaywillj2723
      @nottodaywillj2723 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Balloons were monitored when they got close to the west coast, the military was most likely confused, it was an isolated incident, the last time the U.S. had shot down a hostile aircraft over its airspace was World War II. So they didnt want to cause an unprovoked ruckus on the world stage without identification and confirmations to the t.

  • @jayjayquest4958
    @jayjayquest4958 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I look at things as realistically as I can. I see that China has long term goals militarily and economically, and they have been steadily achieving them. They are modernizing all branches of their military, land, air, sea...and space. They have openly declared that they want Taiwan back under their control, and are deep into preparation for that main event. They've been practicing combined arms all around Taiwan. They build multiple new helicopter bases on the mainland directly across from the island. I see the US putting more forces in Japan and the Philippines to counter, but I don't see the US & it's allies as having the ability to stop the eventual taking of Taiwan. I don't feel the US has the ability or will to stop China. While China continues to grow, I see the US struggling to hold what it has abroad. Afghanistan fell way faster than the analysts thought it would. The US used to have unrivaled military superiority, but both the numerical and technical advantages have shrunk rapidly. China has more ships, and they are quite capable. Their version of AWACS plane is now superior to what the US fields. China is building advanced tactical aircraft at a rate that outpaces the US and if they continue to do so will gain and even exceed US numbers. The US also seems to be doing a lot more reacting verses causing China to react. Don't forget, in the last world war, the US was the worlds factory and turned out the goods to help not only itself, but many allied countries as well. Today China is the worlds factory. I know China has plenty of flaws, but believing they are still a paper tiger when they have become a great dragon is naive.

    • @azteclegalgroup7604
      @azteclegalgroup7604 ปีที่แล้ว

      China will never take Taiwan. First of all, the Chinese economy is crashing because their population is aging unnaturally due to their one child policy and companies are moving out of China. China will soon go into a permanent economic decline.
      Furthermore, China cheaply copies American tech. Chinese engineering and workmanship especially on complicated machines especially without Western help- very poor workmanship.
      Thirdly, all of China’s neighbors will war China with everything they have because they are defending their homes.
      Fourthly, the bases in the Philippines make it impossible for China to take Taiwan. American f22 & ngad fighters will dominate the skies.
      American air power alone is more than enough to sink all Chinese troop transports.
      Plus we have all the best submarines in the world.

    • @azteclegalgroup7604
      @azteclegalgroup7604 ปีที่แล้ว

      All the companies are leaving China so they are no longer the world’s factory and all our military assets are positioned to both completely blockade China and to bomb their factories. China cannot blockade the USA. China might bomb a factory or two but the USA will bomb all of China’s. Nazi Germany had factories too but we were in position to bomb their factories.
      China would lose badly today. They might catch up a little but by 2030 - their economy is done

    • @poonhound9377
      @poonhound9377 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@azteclegalgroup7604none of what you said is true at all. It’s all pure speculation based on ridiculous propaganda.

    • @youarebeingtrolled6954
      @youarebeingtrolled6954 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@azteclegalgroup7604 stupid alert

    • @globalpropertyinvestment
      @globalpropertyinvestment ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@azteclegalgroup7604 Serious cope on display there

  • @ns5575-j2w
    @ns5575-j2w ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How would these compare to non-US subs such as France/Germany/S.Korea/Japan etc.?

    • @sly_lock
      @sly_lock ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The UK and French subs are comparable to the US subs. I'm sure there are strengths and weaknesses and many similarities shared via NATO. Even if China has an equal level of tech in their new boats(doubtful), they completely lack the institutional knowledge required to truly be comparable. The real question is whether they commit to the training, quality assurance, maintenance, and MONEY required to operate and constantly upgrade a fleet. If they do, then one day they can be. There's also a lot that you don't learn when all you do is steal technology and fail to develop it yourself. There's a possibility that Russia could help them achieve their goals, but even they are a shell of what the Soviets once were.
      Those other countries only use diesel subs, as do many others. Most of the quality versions are bought from Sweden. They have their merits, and can be deadly when close to home.

    • @siadwarsame2045
      @siadwarsame2045 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Germany, South Korea, Japan don’t have nuclear powered subs so they aren’t comparable to main nuclear powers subs.
      U.S., Russia, China, France, U.K are the only nations with nuclear subs.

  • @jed1729
    @jed1729 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    China still does not have the quality-control to make jaiba sydgen gears and so forth and things are still lacking haven't seen many programs about it and this seems far-fetched their submarines become quiet

  • @vehx9316
    @vehx9316 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Saying that China is 10 years behind the US fails to address the issue of where would the US be 10 years from now ?

    • @MonkeyDRogzers12
      @MonkeyDRogzers12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      095 submarine will debut in 2-3 years. that will put china in equal standing as usa

    • @Rumtrinker
      @Rumtrinker ปีที่แล้ว +2

      they are not 10 years behind the americans maybe french boats do. the best Chinese sub right now is noisy as hell. and the americans are putting one or two to sea A YEAR!! . the Chinese to be a submarine threat needs to spend good old USSR way. the had 200 SSK and SSNs in the good old cold war and the americans in the 70 peak 120 SSN

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@RumtrinkerAmerican subs will quietly sink at the bottom of the ocean without a fight recently happened in south china sea

    • @loadingnewads
      @loadingnewads ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rumtrinkerstill believing in American ship building industry? That is a paper ball compare to Chinese and even Korean

    • @Rumtrinker
      @Rumtrinker ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Superpooper-2020 the last us sub that sank is the Scorpion what is your imagination saying?

  • @whiteshark450
    @whiteshark450 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Please let the comments not be filled with NaCL.

    • @_XPXI
      @_XPXI ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Salt...

  • @rdiddyspace1708
    @rdiddyspace1708 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Typen 093 better than Type 091 Han class which was very noisy SSN, not hard to do. But I doubt a type 093 outclasses a 688I. so chinese SSN fleet today is a smaller joke than what they had 20 years ago. I'm more worried about what comes after 093 like what would a type 095 class be like and when? make a video speculating on a Type 093 followon please.

  • @chevyslyme
    @chevyslyme ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If I was designing a Chinese sub, I would build a special device to grind away to make a real racket. Lulled into the belief Chinese can't make a quiet sub, once the time comes to be serious, switch to stealth mode.

    • @emilsohn1671
      @emilsohn1671 ปีที่แล้ว

      The issue with that is that they will not learn how good western detection tech is or isnt.

  • @AtlascopcoChong
    @AtlascopcoChong 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1st and 2nd pacific island chains are gone, stay safe in Pearl Harbor boys

  • @ChoongaLoonga
    @ChoongaLoonga ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Well chineese once had the strongest navy during Ming dynasty,they ve reached somalia and indonesia.During Quinn dynasty,they didnt invest in navy

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Ming Treasure Fleet. But that was early in the Ming Dynasty and was dismantled when it got back IIRC.
      It would make for some fun alternate history stuff, if current times wouldn't give it political overtones.

    • @ChoongaLoonga
      @ChoongaLoonga ปีที่แล้ว

      @@recoil53 well they ve knocked out portuguesse in Formosa and Spaniards in Philippines,there is a chance that they still have that Naval spirit in their genes

  • @martinmartinmartin2996
    @martinmartinmartin2996 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Chinese capability was never a joke to any techniologist that understands that the Chinese have the brain power to excel.
    That Chinese makes a huge amount lot of garbage products , DOES NOT REFLECT Chinese the potential.

    • @ttemp2631
      @ttemp2631 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You get what you paid for. Chinese production is like Ikea: they cover from low end to high end of the market

    • @jimdake6632
      @jimdake6632 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How’s this opinion holding up this week?
      Oops.

    • @ttemp2631
      @ttemp2631 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimdake6632 What is to holding up this week?
      Oops.

  • @shabdikacharyya2516
    @shabdikacharyya2516 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please do india vs pakistan 2023

  • @mikeck4609
    @mikeck4609 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I can tell you that the new Russian Yasen subs are about as quiet as an Improved LA class US sub. Pretty quiet but not close to as quiet as a Virgian or Astute. But…the problem for the Russians isn’t that the new Yasen class subs aren’t quite enough; it’s that they can only build a couple. The vast majority of their sub fleet are old Cold War models. The capability of your sub fleet is not equivalent to your best 1 or 2 subs, but the majority of the fleet, as well as the training of the crew.

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Russians greatest weakness with its subs is the fact they basically are locked in really. Especially with NATO blocking off much of the easy routes from their ports to the Atlantic. Not so sure about the Pacific but you have Japan and South Korea plus the Seventh Fleet.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dianapennepacker6854 It would be a bigger weakness if the UK had kept their sub patrol aircraft. It's just a longer route they have to run.
      But with Finland, watching their bases is easier.

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@recoil53 Finland doesnt have a port in the Arctic.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gaborrajnai6213 Indeed, but you don't need a port to monitor.

  • @_XPXI
    @_XPXI ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Remember that time when there was a Chinese sub trailing a British carrier but the sub itself was being trailed by a British submarine

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Source?

    • @LexlutherVII
      @LexlutherVII ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol😂😂

    • @prastagus3
      @prastagus3 ปีที่แล้ว

      that was 091

    • @Dorgon_HetuAla
      @Dorgon_HetuAla ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, your remember.

    • @_XPXI
      @_XPXI ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@J_X999 you think I’m gonna remember the exact link for everything?

  • @eymeeraosaka2954
    @eymeeraosaka2954 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    On the one hand you admitted it is difficult to get accurate info about Chinese Subs and yet you are able to conclude they are not as good as US Subs...? Why can't the Chinese Subs be better than US Subs?

    • @wzk921109
      @wzk921109 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because common sense. Chinese sub is Russian design which generational behind on platforms.

    • @cocodog85
      @cocodog85 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wzk921109 not common sense any more. like the su 27 series jet fighter. the chinese variants are now vastly superior. and newer designs are now on par with western aircraft. actually in some cases derived from american designs.
      while the chinese air to air missiles are now more advanced than western counterparts. western superiority is a myth. just look at the junk the west sent to ukriane.

  • @DirtyHairy1
    @DirtyHairy1 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Enjoy your vacations! :)

  • @sergarlantyrell7847
    @sergarlantyrell7847 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So when they say "Chinese subas are 1 generation behind" why on earth are you trying to convert that to a vague 10-20 year time frame and then back into generation of subs?
    If they say 1 generation behind, just look at the last gen of subs... So depending on how the US counts generations, either Seawolf or the last batch of Los Angeles class boats.

  • @charlieshore-hollingworth7707
    @charlieshore-hollingworth7707 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Chinese subs are deffo getting better, but they’re still not even close to USN tech. NATO subs are not only considerably quieter but also have significantly more advanced and powerful sonars that can our range and out match CCP boats. More importantly that both these things however is the tactics and methods that the USN has which the CCP does not, that’s the really classified stuff.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว

      Binkov says they are definitely getting close to US capabilities.

  • @lasagnadevy7768
    @lasagnadevy7768 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ppl keep laughing and others keep working and spying

  • @brdd514
    @brdd514 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you do a video in the new us navy frigate? The fact they’re getting frigates again, and pumping out 40 of them pretty quick?

  • @TamagoHead
    @TamagoHead ปีที่แล้ว +6

    China’s non-military ship building capability is impressive in sheer tonnage & cost-effectiveness.
    Political actions, shaky financials, no middle class, and ethnic/cultural/language friction shatter the notion of international power projection.
    Between balloons, South China Sea aggression, energy and food dependency, AUKUS, the Quad, and South Korea, Japan, and the Philippine response to parasitic & para-military coast guard actions in disputed waters do not bode well for China.
    I wish the people well with reducing particulate matter and transitioning away from Russian Energy, but it’ll take time.

  • @mohamadfaezbaik2369
    @mohamadfaezbaik2369 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1950 China 🇨🇳 vs USA 🇺🇸

  • @Azzie420
    @Azzie420 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Waiting for the “China Numba Wan” comments

  • @Aras11kl
    @Aras11kl ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fallout is about to get real

  • @KRawatXP2003
    @KRawatXP2003 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The comments under this video is straight up just bad.

  • @walbaby3176
    @walbaby3176 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    „precision parts“ - If there is ONE thing china never achieved, than that is precision manufacturing especially with metal

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pretty sure you need precision manufacturing when making a space station

    • @randomthot125
      @randomthot125 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Who made the Chinese space station then?

    • @Fatallydisorganized
      @Fatallydisorganized ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@elmohead mass production precision manufacturing is way different than a one off spacestation.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, China already achieved that. They show it already they have the machine to do it.

    • @randomthot125
      @randomthot125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Fatallydisorganized Didn't know N-subs are for mass production, where can I buy a reactor?