Fluid Mechanics Lesson 02C: Equation of Fluid Statics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
  • Fluid Mechanics Lesson Series - Lesson 02C: Equation of Fluid Statics
    In this 11-minute video, Professor Cimbala derives the equation of fluid statics, also called hydrostatics, by using Taylor series expansions on a small fluid element. The equation is then simplified for the case of an incompressible fluid.
    This video incorporates material from Section 3-1 of the Fluid Mechanics textbook by Cengel and Cimbala.
    An Excel file listing of all the videos in this series can be found at
    www.me.psu.edu... .
    If you liked this video, please subscribe to Dr. Cimbala's TH-cam channel at / @johncimbala to be informed when new videos are posted.
    You can also watch all related short videos with one click by going to one of Dr. Cimbala's playlists:
    Fluid Mechanics Lesson Series: • Fluid Mechanics Lesson...
    Two-Minute Bible Videos: • Two-Minute Bible Video...
    Two-Minute Excel Tutorials: • Two-Minute Excel Tutor...
    Two-Minute Fluid Mechanics: • Two-Minute Fluid Mecha...
    Two-Minute Math and Statistics Videos: • Two-Minute Math and St...
    Two-Minute Science Videos: • Two-Minute Science Vid...
    Short Marshmallow Peep Videos: • Short Marshmallow Peep...
    Thirty-Second Engineering: • Thirty Second Engineering
    Dr. John M. Cimbala is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State. He is an educator, textbook author, Christian author, husband, father, and grandfather. He also created and maintains a website for helping people grow in their faith called Christian Faith Grower at www.christianf... His TH-cam channel is at / @johncimbala

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @pragmatiste
    @pragmatiste 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is extremely underrated it is Cimbala himself the guy who write the book of fluid mechanics why aren't more people watching

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I don't know why. Please get the word out for me!

    • @apurvnandy
      @apurvnandy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johncimbala hello professor, lovely to see you on youtube.. your books in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics are the best things, I have had in my life...glad to hear your voice..now when I read ur books, your voice will ring in my ears

  • @benjaminyellin5095
    @benjaminyellin5095 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can't seem to understand the purpose of the Taylor expansion.
    All I remember from my calculus courses was it being used to approximate functions as polynomials...how does that relate to what we are doing here?

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We are using it to generate a differential equation. We examine how properties change across a small volume. Then, when that volume shrinks to infinitesimal size, we end up with a differential equation.

  • @ranjeetsinghrehal313
    @ranjeetsinghrehal313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great explanation sir

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind comment. Please tell your friends and colleagues about my TH-cam channel where there are more than 480 free videos about the Bible, fluid mechanics, science, math, Excel, statistics, air pollution, and other topics. I would greatly appreciate it.

  • @ilzylima9996
    @ilzylima9996 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you professor! I understand it!!!!!!

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your kind comment. Please tell your friends and colleagues about my TH-cam channel where there are 500 free videos about the Bible, fluid mechanics, science, math, Excel, statistics, air pollution, and other topics. I would greatly appreciate it.

  • @durkhanaistanekzai4380
    @durkhanaistanekzai4380 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Explained so well!

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your comment. Please tell your friends and colleagues about my TH-cam channel where there are more than 400 free videos about the Bible, fluid mechanics, science, math, statistics, air pollution, and other topics. I would greatly appreciate it.

  • @guntugakgun1924
    @guntugakgun1924 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much professor

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind comment. Please tell your friends and colleagues about my TH-cam channel where there are more than 400 free videos about the Bible, fluid mechanics, science, math, statistics, air pollution, and other topics. I would greatly appreciate it.

    • @guntugakgun1924
      @guntugakgun1924 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johncimbala Of course professor. We are watching and learning from your videos from Turkiye. Thank you so much for these great books and lectures.

  • @Chak_b
    @Chak_b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    GOD DAMN ITS SO GOOD ~ THX

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for the comment - except for the cursing.

  • @trannguyenbaoduy3593
    @trannguyenbaoduy3593 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how about compressible case teacher

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same differential equation since I did not treat density as constant in the derivation. Near the end of the video and near the end of the annotated notes I show an integral that includes the density within the integral since it may not be constant.
      Thank you for your comment. I am glad that my videos have been useful to you! Please tell your friends and colleagues about my TH-cam channel where there are almost 500 free videos about the Bible, fluid mechanics, science, math, Excel, statistics, air pollution, and other topics. I would greatly appreciate it.

  • @parasgautam9537
    @parasgautam9537 ปีที่แล้ว

    truncated Taylor series for single variable in this case would be
    f(x)=f(a)+f'(a) ∆x
    considering this case for multivariable scalar function P, the series would be
    P(x,y,z)(at centre)= P(x,y,z+dz/2)(at top) +(dP(x,y,z+dz/2)/dz)*dz/2
    but how does dP(x,y,z+dz/2)/dz)*dz/2= dP(x,y,z)/dz*dz/2
    is it because z+dz/2=z because dz tends to zero?
    and if dz tends to zero then
    taking center, upper and bottom face would be meaningless, the fluid element would just be a point

    • @johncimbala
      @johncimbala  ปีที่แล้ว

      It shrinks to a point which is why we can truncate the Taylor series in the first place.