Ford Ranger 2019 review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 107

  • @SCORPIO2011
    @SCORPIO2011 6 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    When speaking to Sync 3 don’t speak anything else but what she asks you..talking to the camera means she will not understand your conversation..otherwise it works really well

    • @brettheath3182
      @brettheath3182 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Darn saved me typing that exact line

    • @joelparkin87
      @joelparkin87 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no point in using it when every driver had android or car play

    • @SCORPIO2011
      @SCORPIO2011 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joel Parkin not everyone has CarPlay ,and it’s only available on Sync 3 ...Sync 2 is very similar,don’t speak anything else when speaking ..

  • @seaeagletwo4672
    @seaeagletwo4672 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Forgot to mention all the active safety or did I just miss something?

  • @danieldevil999
    @danieldevil999 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Was this a review or were you just telling us about the updated suspension and comparing it with a FWD hatchback?

  • @Shceif78
    @Shceif78 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Grill has changed, now has daytime running lights, new bumper, new spot light housing, no 4x4 sticker on rear tub, rear tailgate lift assist....... many many more 🤦‍♂️

  • @jankotze1912
    @jankotze1912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    No Expert rating this... You missed a lot my man.

  • @brettheath3182
    @brettheath3182 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a new fuel filter as well. Also front sensors dont allow flared wheel arches from previous px1/2 to fit on front. Will need to wait for someone to make new ones to suit

    • @Shceif78
      @Shceif78 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brett Bigwood
      Hi brett, just bought one with the egr flares and no problem with the sensors, they were moved onto the flares and the sensors adjusted. 👍

  • @krispykruzer
    @krispykruzer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I liked for the effort that went in the review, but the reviewer was poor....like really poor

  • @RhinoXpress
    @RhinoXpress 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They are finally bringing the ranger back in america for 2019 and i can't wait.

  • @nev357
    @nev357 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    7.5 ouch. A bit harsh.

  • @LangaLudidi19741
    @LangaLudidi19741 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 2019 wildtrak is way advanced in terms of technology and performance. It's much better than the 3.2 ito comfort, capabilities, etc. This is a very fun to drive bakkie.

  • @antidumb2992
    @antidumb2992 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They should of used the twin turbo setup on the 3.2 and upped the KW to 160. I have the 3.2 wildtrack and it responds well to exhaust and ECU re-flash.

    • @Reidypie123
      @Reidypie123 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      same with every other diesel these days. which makes you wonder why they dont do them from factory in the first place. my triton got an extra 35% across the range. why not have them from factory?

    • @twooccystraps6458
      @twooccystraps6458 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      xXShadow_TempestXx Emissions and fuel economy are the reasons

    • @Bush_Tucker
      @Bush_Tucker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@twooccystraps6458 also reliability

  • @rsoul7282
    @rsoul7282 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Gone soft? I hadn’t realised that it was hard to begin with.

    • @jankotze1912
      @jankotze1912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not a Toyota Land Cruiser 79, but it is far from soft... Bad review though.

  • @Moonface00z
    @Moonface00z 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    7.5 you serious?
    It should be higher than that.

  • @bill7501
    @bill7501 6 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Probably the worst review ever.... Didn't mention Park assist, running day lights,hid lights, didn't show the new seats, didn't mention anything about the new central locking tray..

    • @TimRobson
      @TimRobson 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bill Loukis Mentioned in the written review. Cheers

    • @omarhammoud7223
      @omarhammoud7223 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AEB also a gamechanger in this segment

    • @jankotze1912
      @jankotze1912 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, it's also as if he exspects it to drice like a sadan...

    • @twooccystraps6458
      @twooccystraps6458 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      He did mention the seats, especially about the no backrest adjustment on the passenger seat. Piss poor FORD

    • @doofus3210
      @doofus3210 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jankotze1912 Expects* Drive* Sedan*

  • @imopn
    @imopn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Id have to test-drive the new 4 Cyl Wildtrack but I bet its boring compared to the 5 Cyl even if the specs show its more powerful.

    • @allizdog5927
      @allizdog5927 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They get better fuel economy but similar power with the smaller twin turbo engine than the 3.2 single turbo can provide.

    • @imopn
      @imopn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allizdog5927 yeah somehow most reviewers tend to comment at some part of their reviews that it feels flat or a bit wanting. If not during overtaking like in this video then during other scenarios where real grunt is needed. I see the specs, it certainly looks good. It just doesn't seem to translate into real world performance. Same issue the Amarok had with its 2l turbo

    • @subabuu2427
      @subabuu2427 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it really comes down your lifestyle, if your just wanting it to just drive around town bit of highway bit of city then the 2.0 is probably best. But the 3.2 would be better for mods, tune, etc. you could only do so much on a 2.0 before it blows it’s such a small engine. I don’t know that’s just how I see it I guess.

  • @Lotrioni
    @Lotrioni 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    what do you mean the passenger seat is not adjustable? would it hurt you to show it instead of speaking whilst driving

  • @boybuyo83
    @boybuyo83 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    yeah. ranger is the best

  • @Moonface00z
    @Moonface00z 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    The safety features are the best in class. But this clown reviewer fail to state it

  • @stevegabbert9626
    @stevegabbert9626 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 2003 Ranger here in the States, love it still. 4L, 2W drive, it's all I need. They stopped producing them here a couple of years before I went to Australia, so it was good to see the name continuing there. But if it came time to buy a new car, I would want one of your Ford Falcon utes. They were called Rancheros here, but they stopped making them in 79", I believe. I'm more into styling than anything, but an FPV version would be nice.

  • @guanghunglo3594
    @guanghunglo3594 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a new Ranger supplied as a work vehicle. Why does the vehicle shake at low speeds? Lightly accelerating away from stop the vehicle noticeably shakes up until you reach about15km/hr. After that it drives nice and smooth. It is very annoying and I can't remember any other vehicle I have had that has done this? The vehicle I have has the six speed auto.

  • @kishankish5438
    @kishankish5438 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why they stop using the 3.2 5cylinder engine?? Someone explain?

    • @oldbloke100
      @oldbloke100 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      you don't listen, you can get ether

  • @sobenphon5858
    @sobenphon5858 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Between Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2019 and Hilux Revo Rally 2019 which one you guy think is the best?

    • @vimak8875
      @vimak8875 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think Bi-Turbo Wild track is better in technology and power but Hilux is better in durability.
      I'm also looking for answer to your question anyway

  • @MrFijibati
    @MrFijibati 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would appreciate a thorough comparison review of the top model of each ute brand.. likes of Ford Ranger Raptor, Hilux Rugged X, Amarok V6 Ultimate and Holden Z71 Extreme !
    The end result will crown the ute KING in the now highly competitive ute market.

    • @Andrew-1974
      @Andrew-1974 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      D K... the KING is the top seller, not speed, not all the bells and whistles. VW and Holden can only dream to sell as many Hilux's. Actually, Hilux almost out sold the entire Holden range in September 2018 in Australia, just stating a fact

  • @ardimananakpoboya3013
    @ardimananakpoboya3013 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unfortunately, the Ford Ranger Inspiration of the Modern Double Cabin T6 is a duplicate for other brands ....

  • @davewatson2124
    @davewatson2124 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another half arsed review. Why are you so called reviewers to scared to mention the problems with the DPF and the oil pump that wont self prime.

    • @mitchellmildwaters2873
      @mitchellmildwaters2873 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dave that's the 3.2. this is a different engine

    • @davewatson2124
      @davewatson2124 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Mitchell for that info. I am in the market for a dual cab soon and was going to settle for the Triton. The Ranger is a good looking bit of kit so I will have investigate further. Cheers

    • @mitchellmildwaters2873
      @mitchellmildwaters2873 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeh I took the Ranger for a drive it is really good. Even picked up great over 100. So I'm pretty set on buying on now

  • @grecoconduris6716
    @grecoconduris6716 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the over taking acceleration of the new engine, is it worse than the 3.2? Or better than the 3.2?

    • @vimak8875
      @vimak8875 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I need the answer too

  • @baecchi4153
    @baecchi4153 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why oh why shrink the engine to 2.0 .. the minimum should be 2.5 .. but i want mine in 3.0 bi turbo ..

  • @alanmeeds54
    @alanmeeds54 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    My 2016 Wildtrack seat was replaced by ford as the plastic leather had split
    The entire chassis was covered in rust and dealer said you see more rust because of the high wheel arches
    Other makes cover there chassis in a sealant not thin paint
    Very disappointed ford let this truck down with rust
    Alan xxx

  • @iMitsubishiZA
    @iMitsubishiZA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the question is
    Do I buy the 2.0 or 3.2?

    • @eshan2640
      @eshan2640 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What did u end up going with?

  • @jackaclaracion7312
    @jackaclaracion7312 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good performance really.

  • @DeadUgly1
    @DeadUgly1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rear roll bar cool story.

  • @vevohoeyo
    @vevohoeyo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tim's rating.. 7.5 the rest of the utes must come in at 5 then bar the amarock

  • @kamilkuszewski3606
    @kamilkuszewski3606 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2019 or ranger raptor?

    • @tmfrs2
      @tmfrs2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kamil Kuszewski Wildtrak for daily, unless of you have a lot of off-roading places don’t bother with the raptor. Though speed bumps are nicer on the raptor

  • @actorzone856
    @actorzone856 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was following a new Ford 4x4 along a street and noticed the rear shock absorbers hang low below the rear diff which you can see on this one, these are going to be ripped off if you take it off road.

    • @sams1550
      @sams1550 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just... stahp... 😂

    • @actorzone856
      @actorzone856 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sams1550 should i have said castrated?

    • @sams1550
      @sams1550 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@actorzone856 No... you should just know that they're all the same

    • @actorzone856
      @actorzone856 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sams1550 i don't have anything to do with ford rangers, my old Hilux and Nissan lower shock supports don't hang below the diff.

    • @actorzone856
      @actorzone856 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @fukthegoog I know what i own, Nissan Navara 4x4, the shocker bolt is mounted on the plate which is level with the lower spring and does not protrude below like the Fords, have a look when you are following one.

  • @ADHD55
    @ADHD55 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    157kw ???

  • @sachinjussun4115
    @sachinjussun4115 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ford 4x4 one of the best

  • @jesssiu448
    @jesssiu448 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ford ranger should use 5.0L gasoline engine just like ford expedition

  • @Schaiksub
    @Schaiksub 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Ford Everest Turbo “Broke” with only 58K on the clock. It seems there is a massive problem with the ford Turbos that no one is talking about! Sold it immediately after being repaired by ford and got a Hilux. Stay away as far as possible from ford. You have been warned.

  • @cookieman_notlanceroblox
    @cookieman_notlanceroblox 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:22

  • @ardimananakpoboya3013
    @ardimananakpoboya3013 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    if for me the Ford Ranger has been proven, but unfortunately after I saw it, it seems that some of the all new Ford Ranger are imitating in terms of appearance, in my opinion the manufacturer seems to be lacking Inspiration ..... if we have to copy ... from the Ford Ranger to Pursue market.....

  • @lukeaaron5588
    @lukeaaron5588 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try releasing it with the diesel v6 powerstroke. Enough of the fancy schmancy stuff, put an actual engine under the hood not just 'tech'.

  • @vkmuzembe3617
    @vkmuzembe3617 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice one

  • @stanleyleong9802
    @stanleyleong9802 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    best review on ford ranger 2019 so far

  • @matiasferrer6400
    @matiasferrer6400 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Junk! I had a 1993 Ranger xlt. That was a good rig. Shes still around, mind u with new owner.

  • @jianlim2636
    @jianlim2636 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy Tim is one of the worst reviewers Australia got to offer

  • @Sabumnim666
    @Sabumnim666 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bi turbo there is an actual difference

  • @bobs.stevenson9704
    @bobs.stevenson9704 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    it would be good if you had some critique eg. 'too bouncey', if you bothered to give an example of by what standard you came to that, what can the consumer actually use as a standard of how the vehicle should handle rather than just some bullshit in your own mind. failure.

  • @kritsadaod
    @kritsadaod 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤗🤗

  • @crazycressy7986
    @crazycressy7986 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sync 1 ,reviewer 0,

    • @Cous1nJack
      @Cous1nJack 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s sync 3

    • @crazycressy7986
      @crazycressy7986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Cous1nJack no it's the score I was on about like in football ,meaning the sync has scored 1 and the reviewer scored 0 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 he don't know how to use it but slags it off,as for the comment below ,no you did not know ,just trying to get out of it because you was wrong, funny how I can't now send a replie lol t@at

    • @Cous1nJack
      @Cous1nJack 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@crazycressy7986 I know.. 🎣

  • @esvignettes7592
    @esvignettes7592 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When did the ranger ever have balls ?

  • @daiweisong3802
    @daiweisong3802 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    80k for a 2.0L trash? Stop being a di*k head, and put the F150 and Explore in place. Fuel is only $1 something in AUS. Put this kind of Fuel saver Eco Nimble Jumble to New Zealand where Fuel is $2! We need V8!!!!

  • @positivepete4265
    @positivepete4265 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ford Sync is horrible and always has been, Ford customer service is even worse. You're buying from a company that doesn't give a damn, and from a company with a host of dealers that also don't give a damn. Waste of money buying a suburb gangster mobile.

  • @magnum3550
    @magnum3550 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes this guy is a clown Do you get the feeling he don’t like fords

  • @paulmelnychuk5477
    @paulmelnychuk5477 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like to take that truck and take it off road and just live just beat the s*** out of it. Return the car to the dealer no thanks!!!

  • @mantinyu2733
    @mantinyu2733 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If this car has a sunroof, that will be better

    • @SCORPIO2011
      @SCORPIO2011 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Don’t think any utes have sunroofs...want sun get a SUV four door

    • @blakeus11
      @blakeus11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Iv heard of dealers getting sunroofs installed for customers that want them. Not all will do it though

    • @jakefeng4516
      @jakefeng4516 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      John Burke The top spec Nissan Navara has sunroof

  • @therambler3713
    @therambler3713 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    better buy a Amarok

  • @johndoe-wh6td
    @johndoe-wh6td 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its called poser cars

  • @stephenedwards9857
    @stephenedwards9857 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    lolol its still a crap ford

    • @remsterk
      @remsterk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As opposed to what? Holden Colorado and Hilux don't even come close to the Ranger.