Olympus OM-D E-M1X | First Look and Hands On. Wildlife in the Bavarian National Park
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
- Taking the helm of their CSC lineup, Olympus has today launched a new flagship model, the OM-D E-M1X. Aimed at professionals, particularly sports and wildlife shooters, the manufacturer states that this camera will underline what Micro Four Thirds sensors are capable of, and provide a compelling mix of features and portability.
Read our LiveView for more info - bit.ly/2WbBDSa
For pricing and to pre-order the Olympus OM-D E-M1X visit- bit.ly/2COCRu3
#Olympus #OMD #EM1X #LondonCameraExchange - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Fantastic channel!
Absolutely beautiful setting for photos. Wonderful pictures of the animals. Solid video production as well. Thanks! Gave you a follow.
Matt!!! Lovely to see you here! Great video too. What a location!
How does the autofocus system handle fast erratic moving subjects?
If I was using the Oly with a 300MM lens for a 600MM field of view, is there any way to also get the bokeh that comes with a longer focal length 600MM lens when tracking a distant subject like a race car or footballer... or my nephews in a crowd?
I often need separation from an ugly or distracting background.
Maybe a bokeh art filter?
I think the image processing in smartphones now commonly generates artificial bokeh or maybe a gaussian blur.
The new cellphones do some wonderful things, but their artificial blur is far from perfected, unless you just get lucky with what's in the image. With this camera and lens, I'd just accept what I can't change in foreground-background differences, or spend some time looking for more accomodating scenes.
Im selling all my Panasonic , canon and fuji gear to fund the 150-400mm
Have not read the em1x manual
No custom settings yet
No my menu set up
I love my new em1x
4-15-2021 photographed & video 1st track meet
With a Tamron 70-300mm via VILTROX adapter
On em1x
focus was fast enough for long jump
Continues focus work
Video worked
Tracking worked
And I have no clue how to go into the new menu to refine my settings
Im very impressed with the new supper control panel.
The camera works best with larger lenses
Smaller lenses are to light and hard to steady perfectly balanced with larger lenses
Honest view and fair conclusions. Thanks
The title is slightly misleading...there are TWO bavarian national parks...one is where you are and the other is way down south in the alps.
Looks a lovely place for wildlife. Although it is a compact type of set-up (the E-M1x is massive though!), maybe for wildlife people would look elsewhere to cameras with a larger sensor; Pair the Nikon D500 with a Nikkor 200-500mm f5.6 (300-750mm equiv.) & you have an ideal wildlife set-up. Or maybe the Nikon D850 with the Nikkor 500mm F5.6 PF lens (which is very compact) and it is then close to the Oly combo shown here, only you have 45MP of FF image (so image could be cropped easily without noticing much degradation). I think this is a tough sell for Olympus unless you are really sold into that system already.
Steve Ferneyhough. Prior to moving to Sony, I owned a Nikon D500 + Nikkor 300mm f4 PF ED VR + Nikkor TC14EIII + Nikkor 200 - 500mm f5.6 and a Sigma 180mm f2.8 OS macro lens. I complimented my Nikon system with an Olympus EM1 mark II + Oly 300mm f4 + Oly 1.4TC + Oly 12 - 100mm f4 + PanaLeica 100 - 400mm. I used both systems in tandem for wildlife photography, but preferred my Olympus system to my Nikon system. I used to take some shots as close to identical as possible then, following processing, try to identify which shot was taken with which camera. I found it really diificult on quality alone and often guessed wrong - especially birds in flight. On the rare occasions I took just one camera out with me it was always the EM1.2. But, excellent though the Oly 300mm f4 is, it is not the optical equivalent of a 600mm f4 on a FF camera. It is important to understand and work with the limitations of an M43 system. I recently sold my Sony A9 and A7III and purchased an A7R4 (which paired with the 200 - 600mm is outstanding for wildlife) and currently trying to decide on a second camera. I am actually considering an EM1X, as I do miss some of the features Olympus offers, but will probably end up with a second A7R4.
niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
At 07:15 you specify that the camera can shoot 30P 4:2:2 at 10 bit. This is not the case, it only can shoot 30P 4:2:0 at 8 bit internally or externally to a recorder. This is a real shame as the camera with it's superb IS would be an amazing camera if it did shoot at 10bit 4:2:2. Sorry to pick you up on this but it is an important point.
You mixed all the pictures. It is not known when you use this camera, not another one. Greetings! :)
Pity you didn't use a M4/3 4k camera to shoot the video, all the way to Bavaria to shoot this and the video quality looks like you used a 1980's vhs camera.
It seems to me that only the 7D Mark II, the 1Dx Mark II, the D500, and the D5 compete directly with this camera. I don't think the A9 is built as well. The A7 is not built as well and the A7 sports and wildlife autofocus is not this good. And I am not sure about the Fuji sports and wildlife autofocus.
The image quality does not convince me, neither the size or the price. That 3year old tiny sensor lacks flexibility and there seems to be no further m3/4 sensor development in the pipeline.
I only watched this for the Lynx...but would much rather see them in the wild aka natural environment and not a zoo... Still Beauty Cats!
He is in a National Park forest. Those gorgeous cats are wild and free.
it doesn't shoot 10-bit
7.5EV image stabilization... sounds good on paper, but the noise at ISO3200 is comparable to ISO12K on the A7RIII, or even higher if you resize the 42Mpix to 20Mpix. So not that impressive anymore...
The price is nuts. I can buy a sony a7iii and lens for that. Iso still 200 it's still no good for low light
But the A7iii is a toy compared to the weather sealing and build. This is built like a tank for rugged outdoor down and dirty shooting with built in GPS and field sensors. The weather sealing on the Sony's are a joke!
@@gregs4163 Look at Tony Northrup video on these cameras i would say the sony is defiantly weather sealed for every day use.
@@slhibbs There have been several test done on Sony Cameras that show they fail on anything greater than a light mist. I don't believe a thing Tony Northrup says extremely bias... right up there with Fro! The 1X is built for more than everyday use, built for the Amazon to the Arctic!
@@gregs4163 I would not take it anywhere were you have more hours of darkness than light.
Does this knock out the Fuji X-T3?
m43 is not for low light or fast shutter speed, that is why I moved to FF system.
This is not "wildlife", the animals are kept within.. It's basically a zoo.
Not a single negative point mentioned. There are a lot negatives though: Weight, size, prize, ISO performance; everything above ISO 1000 isn't really useable. This camera is advertised as a wildlife camera. Especially when you are shooting birds you need to set your shutterspeed to a minimum of 1/1000s, but rather to 1/2000s or above and then you have to set your ISO much higher in most cases.
Also I am tired of people saying a 300mm m43 lens is like a 600mm FF lens. No it's not, when you are using a 300mm FF lens you simple can crop the image and have the same image.
Btw: I am a m43 user myself, i like the system but it has its downsides.
I've never used a FF camera that crops to the image size of a zoomed lens on a smaller sensor, to get the "same" quality image. A perfect example (and I have MANY such examples) is when I cropped images from the Leica Q down to the image size I'd get with the Leica D-Lux (Panasonic LX100) M4/3 camera at the 75mm equivalent at maximum zoom. Not even close.
*ONLY* if you have 40mp or more.
A good advice. Buy a Sony A9 plus a Sony 100-400mm GM and you get a much, much better system which has better lenses available and which has a future.
In terms of image quality that 300mm is right up there. I use it and it compares very favourably with my Nikon kit. I do wish it was faster admittedly and I would rather see the development of some truly fast glass in MFT. One thing the MFT critics are all not mentioning is this tuff is relatively small and light. If my back could still handle walking in the field all day with a FF body and fast prime I would be out there with my Nikons but it can't. The MFT system has it's limitations but the best camera is the one you have with you and most of the time that has to be my Olympus.
Yeah unless you operate in a normal mans world and not a rich mans one. Where are the 800mm lenses for Sony anyway?
@@JoeMaranophotography Many, you don't have it either. Please don't refer to the crop factor of 2. I could use for this purpose a 400mm 2.8 GM in combination with a Sony A7RIII, crop into it ans still have more MP than what you get with your crappy MFT and any MFT glass. Face the fact, MFT is dead. From product technology and future.
@@Stefan1968ful You might have more MP but have less density its not as simple as just cropping. Also have fun paying for that and lugging it around handheld ;)
@@JoeMaranophotography Look at the pixel pitch of MFT then you know your problem. And as I said, MFT has no future. Olympus publishes a nonce camera and Panasonic as indirectly stepping out. Think about twice before spending so much money into an inferior system like MFT.
Oh boy...just iso800 and IQ already does look bad. Just a sunshine camera as it seems!