Hey Jon, technically we just fit, most fittings are always partial lessons as well, and a couple of people have requested to come back and see me to work on a few things after I have fitted them, which I have done, but really we are fitting specialists mainly.
Another Good honest review and the performance data speaks for itself. It is a ‘controlled’ environment so your findings are your findings and are a true representation. I believe getting them out on the course and seeing how they perform in a real time environment is the best way to test a ball, especially around the greens. You have obviously caveated your review with what you can’t test…..unfortunately people always want to see more😂
I'm too scared of actually getting out on grass to do that mate 👀👀😅😅 no I just wouldn't have time realistically. Until we get a bit bigger and maybe hire more people to take a bit of work off me and then I can hopefully put some more time into the content.
If only 😅😅😅😅 umm better! Not loads in it obviously but it just feeling slightly lighter and very slightly softer just sits in that nice sweet spot for me 👌
MyGolfSpy reviewed the Sugar balls back in June and found some issues with certain facets of the ball it was mentioned you couldn’t test. While they looked to perform similar to the ProV1 in your test, the MGS review noted some issues
I’ve talked to the owner of Sugar about that, and all I’ll say is he did not think MGS gave them anything near a fair shake. That said, they’ve spent considerable resources improving their QC since then. And for what it’s worth, I’ve been playing Sugars for a year and a half now (50+ rounds per year), and they perform no different than ProVs on a sim and out on the course. They really are a great golf ball.
MGS are biased towards Titleist. Their balls always come out top in any test they do. Any pretender to the crown of the prov v1 is discredited for some reason or another when objectively we can see here there are lots of balls that measure up to the PV1.
Excellent video my man, would you be able to do Kirkland next?
Thanks Rahul, actually a good shout. I'll certainly pop it on the to do list 👍
I’d like to see a sugar to Kirkland comparison honestly. There’s so many pro v vs Kirkland videos
@@J_pearce01 certainly plenty of content to be made isn't there 👌 I'll try and get round to it all 😅👍
Do you teach or is it just club fitting?
Hey Jon, technically we just fit, most fittings are always partial lessons as well, and a couple of people have requested to come back and see me to work on a few things after I have fitted them, which I have done, but really we are fitting specialists mainly.
Love your vids. Agree on the T100-s irons. I got fitted for them over the summer. If a golf club could be sexy, that's what they are. They're so pure.
I like the channel because the videos are long. And in-depth
I like the channel but the videos are too long.
Another Good honest review and the performance data speaks for itself. It is a ‘controlled’ environment so your findings are your findings and are a true representation. I believe getting them out on the course and seeing how they perform in a real time environment is the best way to test a ball, especially around the greens. You have obviously caveated your review with what you can’t test…..unfortunately people always want to see more😂
I'm too scared of actually getting out on grass to do that mate 👀👀😅😅 no I just wouldn't have time realistically. Until we get a bit bigger and maybe hire more people to take a bit of work off me and then I can hopefully put some more time into the content.
Now you need a wind tunnel to test aerodynamics 😆 Good video! How would you say the Black TR 5x feels vs the 6x?
If only 😅😅😅😅 umm better! Not loads in it obviously but it just feeling slightly lighter and very slightly softer just sits in that nice sweet spot for me 👌
Great work. Love the thoroughness of tour reviews.
Thanks Jim 👍👍
Excellent in-depth review Ross
Thanks bud 🤛
MyGolfSpy reviewed the Sugar balls back in June and found some issues with certain facets of the ball it was mentioned you couldn’t test. While they looked to perform similar to the ProV1 in your test, the MGS review noted some issues
Yes that wouldn't be a massive surprise Kevin. Think to do that quality control to Titleists level would be a huge operation and cost a lot of money.
I’ve talked to the owner of Sugar about that, and all I’ll say is he did not think MGS gave them anything near a fair shake. That said, they’ve spent considerable resources improving their QC since then. And for what it’s worth, I’ve been playing Sugars for a year and a half now (50+ rounds per year), and they perform no different than ProVs on a sim and out on the course. They really are a great golf ball.
MGS are biased towards Titleist. Their balls always come out top in any test they do. Any pretender to the crown of the prov v1 is discredited for some reason or another when objectively we can see here there are lots of balls that measure up to the PV1.
@14:11 🤣