so? that isnt the rule. the rule is you cant lift their hips above their head, not that their head cant go below their hips. its not about the result its about the intention. this is why the sport should have never gone pro.
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger are you smoking something? its literally the rule! player taken past horizontal landed on his head and should have been a Red card
@@PanicMechanic that’s not the tacklers fault you only get carded for that when you lift them past the horizontal this was just from the force of the tackle nothing wrong here
I can understand why the ref called it a penalty at this level... it's clearly not, just a monstrous tackle, but in real time if you weren't focusing on the contact.. that'd be hard to tell, meanwhile ol mate is in a coma now
Agree. Also, looks like he had to put the receiver on side, which could explain holding on for a moment too long. Maybe that also explains why the receiver ran over to check on him (felt guilty). Poor form from the tackler though for just walking away when he was clearly hurt. Competitive contact sport aside, the professional guys do it if they know they've just murdered someone.
The timing and the arms around the body looks fine to me as well but the tackler has a duty of care to make sure that the ball handler isn't placed in a dangerous position. Looking at the video, kid went past the horizontal and landed on his head
@@terencegorogo1531 same as Courtney lawes v France at Twickenham few years ago and nothing happened to him. Tacklers force was to much for the opponent but that not the tackles fault. This is a rugby incident
Slightly late on that tackle. For the very least needs to protect the player he's tackling. Takes opposition clean out, AFTER ball leaves opposition's hands. I'm a Boys High old boy. Trust me, you cant have this wrekless play in schoolboy rugby games. Mistakes can happen at this tempo, really bad mistakes.
@@five1steph I don’t think it’s late. Ball had only just left his hands and the player was already committed. I do agree that bad things can happen at this level of school boy which is why coaches shouldn’t select players this small as it is inevitable that they will get hurt if they are being tackled by guys twice the weight of them
Not going to comment on the tackle being legal or not. IMO it debatable both ways. But more concerning, how is the boy who got tackled? Did he make full recovery?
He tackled a player without the ball and tackled him with such force he ended up in a dangerous position. The rules clearly state you cant tackle a player without the ball or put them in a dangerous position.
Dit was n monster tackel. Eina. Op x.25 spoed is dit Nog steeds onder n sekonde, na die bal sy hande verlaat het. Dit is nie hoog nie! Wat was vout hier? ASB help my Verstaan?
if you take the (even minutest) time to 'pull' the defence toward you, so you can free another person in your team to run free and get space to score a try, then you must face the consequence,...... (of being struck by a missile)
@@brianfisher3470 jirre né die man heel bo is reg, die man is verby vertikaal getiep, jy weet mos nou dis illegal. En daai man wat getackle is, is poes toe. Hy kan maar net sowel die ou afstuur.
Bullshit if ever I've heard it. The tackler made contact below the should (legal) with so much force the ball carrier flipped. Late tackle again no he was committed. Easier for a referee to give a card rather than do his job. Lazy refereeing.
Stupid ref he had a great view of the tackle amd still chose the card, nothing wrong with the tackle at all. Imagine being sent off for tackling somebody too hard. Embarasing...
It’s the tacklers responsibility to make sure the other player doesn’t land on his head, past the horizontal line. That kid did a flip and landed on his neck. By the rules that’s a red card and a suspension.
I was next to the field that day, he was 100% committed to the tackle. Nothing wrong with the tackle, was below his shoulders. If you cant take a tackle dont play rugby
@@nicolaasmostert5577 As I said, he knew he wasn't going to make the tackle on time, whether he was committed or not. It's not about being able to take a tackle Mr tough guy.....
nothing tough about being that small and playing rugby. kid should work out and eat or play another sport. if he cant eat and train properly for the sport thats on him. Soccer is VERY popular in south africa. I'm sure there are other non contact sports at his school. The basic fact is that rugby is not a participation trophy sport. and its not a sport about picking on guys your own size. if you want fair weight matchups the kid should do boxing or wrestling. this is rugby. bigger stronger guys and smaller more agile guys compete against eachother to cause scores and prevent scores.
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger go read the rule! besides how does the player go through the horizontal manage to land on his head first without being lifted off the ground! red card all the way home. The definition of horizontal is when your head goes past your hips and legs, have some common sense jeez
@@PanicMechanic it doesnt say you cant be lifted off the ground. it says the hips cant be lifted above the head. not the head cant go below the hips. the tackle that is illegal are when you spear their head into the ground, not when you hit them so hard they leave their feet.
@@PanicMechanic you make absolutely no sense. Nothing in the technique of the tackle made the kid land on his head, it was the force. Are we gonna start telling kids to tackle softer now?
@@BeskuitenBroffie no, but you can see the intent to cause injury and that's playing the man not the ball and frankly not in the spirit of the game! Secondly it's all about technique chop! The technique use was to go higher than the hips and thus causing the issue of going through the horizontal. But hey clearly safety doesn't come first for you, maybe one day when your son gets hit like that and ends up paralyzed or potentially getting a life altering injury then you will be on the other side of the fence and bitch and moan then...
@@PanicMechanic it was a bigger player that hit a smaller player so hard that he went past the horizontal line. Perfect technique. The only way in which he could’ve safely landed in this situation was if he had tackled him softer. I hope that is not what you are suggesting, If so there is a sport with a round ball where pussies kick it into a net that you might enjoy watching.
@@TheBloodSportExpress First of all when you start with because one player is bigger than the other i already know you don't know the laws and you wont know how its applied either! Laws say nothing about player size only about player safety and that its the responsibilities of the tackling player! The only way to tackle is softer to prevent that? are you maybe blind? he had to go lower! its extremely close to being high so maybe go learn to read before getting but hurt over facts! no wonder you lot in SA complain about the refs so much, don't actually know the laws.
@@PanicMechanic if you lift someone past the horizontal then yes, but that guy just got tackled the shit out of him and his so small that he justed flipped
@@nicolaasmostert5577 that's the reason why he went past the horizontal! laws make no provision for how a player gets lifted and includes not directly lifting the player straight up first (this would be the "Tip" tackle which is different these are also know as the spearing of a player or dunking which are generally the easiest to give straight reds) In this case the players feet go over his head meaning he had to go beyond the horizontal and also means player had to be lifted, which then makes its the tackling players responsibility for safety and reason for the card
The fact to remember is, this is school rugby. Yes, it is a fair tackle, but really, is it necessary to risk serious injury to the guy you are tackling by going into the tackle like that. Play hard, but play fair. What if you were the much smaller guy on the receiving side of the tackle. The force was totally unnecessary.
@@martinwolmarans1833 your ability to play this sport is not measured by how hard you hit someone. He could’ve still been perfect without trying to kill him.
I feel bad for the bloke that went down but the tackle was fair. It was a great hit. That referee shouldnt be there again this referee games because he doesn't know what he's doing
@@martinjugolin2087 too high??!😳it's like you don't know rugby rules, that was just a dangerous tackle without anything wrong with the tackler. The tackler is probably 90+kg against a scrum half, of course he's gonna fucking kill that kid cause he came at speed, the tackle was just wrekcless but he did everything right. Are you from the northern hemisphere?
Not high...has arms out but doesn't get the wrap and loses all control and does not bring player to the ground safely. Infact brings player to ground very unsafely. Bordering on red card...imo....very dangerous.
If you pause the video at the right time you’ll see that he does wrap his arms. It was a bigger player that hit a smaller player with so much force that he got flipped. He did not pick him up and dunk him. The only way to have put him dow safely in this situation would’ve been to tackle him softer.
If hed tackled him before releasing ball fair enough but either way it was reckless and dangerous good decision ref yellow card ,had a ring of out to do damage to it
then play another. thats what makes this fun. thats like saying theres too much risk in MMA or rock climbing. yes, thats what this game is about, thats what makes it fun.
The amount of people in the comments that dont understand the laws of rugby is shocking! no wonder they give South Africans a hard time about complaining about refs! its because they dont understand the rules
I've played rugby since i was 5 years old. That was a cheap shot. The ball was gone. The guy probably coudlnt fully pull out of the tackle but he drove as hard as he could with his shoulder through the guys neck. There will be no next generation of rugby players because parents watching that will just say "no thank you".
@Alex it wasn’t a lift. The force of the tackle on a smaller player is what turned him. Nothing the player could have done differently in his technique except not hit him as hard. Not dangerous play. We shouldn’t penalize the player for being physical. We should question the coach why he selected someone who clearly isn’t physically ready to play at that level
@@megatom210 Doesnt have to be a lift! its at any time that the tackled player goes past the horizontal! people need to go read the laws. Rules are there for a reason! easy to say that shouldn't penalize that player for being physical yet could have broken someone's neck by being reckless, yes it was reckless
@@PanicMechanic its only when lifting someones legs above his head that its dangerous play, if you weigh as much as an rugby ball then dont play this sport, im and old boy of that school and saw it al happening infront of me. 100% nothing wrong there, cant help the guy is as light as a feather
Dont play opens if your scared of being hit by big guys. Theres no rules around size, what you want the bigger guys to do, let the small fast guys run around them? Big guys have to play to their strengths, using their size, small guys their agility and speed. Nothing wrong with that hit. Imagine you switch the 2 players and small guy destroys big guy, how come thats fine now? Doesn't make sense.
@@amatmc8319 This isnt opens ! what makes you believe that its opens? clearly in the video description that its u/14 or cant you read just like you cant read the rugby law books about whats a fair tackle and that taking someone beyond the horizontal and them ending on their head first is illegal
Want hierdie is `n sport, nie `n veldslag nie. Dit was `n kleinerige mannetjie daai, hy moes homself bietjie ingeperk het. Redelike hoog gevat - jy tackle `n man se bene - nie sy bolyf nie. As sy bors te naby is aan die grond vir jou? Wel dalk is hy `n laaitjie in vergelyking met jou. Dit was uiters gevaarlik - dis nie `n geval van "all gloves are off" nie.
@@kevinflynn9715 Forget your personal hang ups for a moment Kevin. Rugby is just a game and the rules are the rules. In this instance the balls long gone, so the tackle is late. The tackler has no control over the player once he launches into the tackle, so it’s reckless.
@@amatmc8319 “it’s rugby you get hit hard” absolutely Mitchell, that’s why the rules are there to keep players safe and the game fair. Nothing better in rugby than a tough hard hit well timed and within the rules of the game. Nothing worse in rugby than illegal play that endangers others, and someone on the sideline shouting pussy at people. I can understand you saying the tackle was only a fraction late, but that is unfortunately still late.
show me a guy that can drive a 160kmph cricket ball through the covers any day of the week, but this is just a stupid sport. High School boy over here got tackled over here in my province and ended up paralyzed for the rest of his life because of this macho man sport. The High School teams over here keep talking about their big tackles and hurting the other players every monday....but they lost the game. Huge bully sport imo..
This clip is on Instagram. Holy shot but the snowflakes there🤨 Pretty much calling it a dog shit whatever that means, cheap shot blah blah blah. etc. Makes your head spin. We all played. If you can't handle a good tackle stay off the field.
Glad too see he was still moving- joh!
End of the day he landed on his head....
so? that isnt the rule. the rule is you cant lift their hips above their head, not that their head cant go below their hips. its not about the result its about the intention. this is why the sport should have never gone pro.
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger are you smoking something? its literally the rule! player taken past horizontal landed on his head and should have been a Red card
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger bro u dumb haha he landed on his head dont matter if its intentional or not
@@PanicMechanic can you fk off with your pussy ass attitude. This is way we invented soccer, for soft kunts
@@PanicMechanic that’s not the tacklers fault you only get carded for that when you lift them past the horizontal this was just from the force of the tackle nothing wrong here
I can understand why the ref called it a penalty at this level... it's clearly not, just a monstrous tackle, but in real time if you weren't focusing on the contact.. that'd be hard to tell, meanwhile ol mate is in a coma now
its because player went beyond Horizontal and landed on his head and neck, should have been a red
@@PanicMechanic bunch of pussies. Its rugby he got smoked with a legal tackle.
Agree. Also, looks like he had to put the receiver on side, which could explain holding on for a moment too long. Maybe that also explains why the receiver ran over to check on him (felt guilty). Poor form from the tackler though for just walking away when he was clearly hurt. Competitive contact sport aside, the professional guys do it if they know they've just murdered someone.
Perfectly timed tackle not a card.
Lols are you blind the ball left his hands ,. It's late
He was already in the air as the kid was passing lol you can't pull out of a tackle like that. Good hit.
should have been a red, went past horizontal and ended on his head
Nothing wrong with the tackle - he used his arms and it was not high ... but it was well timed!
The timing and the arms around the body looks fine to me as well but the tackler has a duty of care to make sure that the ball handler isn't placed in a dangerous position.
Looking at the video, kid went past the horizontal and landed on his head
@@terencegorogo1531 same as Courtney lawes v France at Twickenham few years ago and nothing happened to him. Tacklers force was to much for the opponent but that not the tackles fault. This is a rugby incident
Incredibly high wdym
How was it well timed if the guy didn’t have the ball he had already made the pass
@@Desi0519 he was already on his way - no way to stop the inevitable
What annoys me the most is the fact that his teammates just stood there doing nothing after their fly half got laid out. Embarrassing and soft
To be honest there's not much they can do? Just gotta wait for the medics. I think they were all still shocked by the tackle lol.
What could they do, that was a legal tackle so they couldn't start a fight ir ro anything
Slightly late on that tackle. For the very least needs to protect the player he's tackling.
Takes opposition clean out, AFTER ball leaves opposition's hands.
I'm a Boys High old boy. Trust me, you cant have this wrekless play in schoolboy rugby games. Mistakes can happen at this tempo, really bad mistakes.
@@five1steph I don’t think it’s late. Ball had only just left his hands and the player was already committed. I do agree that bad things can happen at this level of school boy which is why coaches shouldn’t select players this small as it is inevitable that they will get hurt if they are being tackled by guys twice the weight of them
Too small? Really? I recal someone telling a certain small guy from brackenfell he was too small to make it on the international stage ...
Not illegal just the perfect mix of everything resulting in a big hit.
Bro he is paralyzed
The CAT scan just showed very fine powder particles in in spine
Why is he getting a card? Perfect shot! I want to laugh, cringe and break stuff at the same time
Lol
It's a red card. He falls on his head first. The hit was legal but it's your responsibility to make he doesnt fall on his head first.
@@sirfrancis6058 only if you lift intentionally past the horizonal line. A hit like that is completely legal and just bad luck how he ended up.
@@boldbeam4534 100% correct
Edgy
I wish they had video cameras in my school rugby days. Die manne het taamlik seer gekry lol.
That yellow card is insane tho 😮
I was legit sitting next to the field waiting to play and saw it happen in front of me
Is the young guy ok?
bs
I bet the tackle made you think twice about going in, ayyy?? Lol
He's in his poes !
Not going to comment on the tackle being legal or not. IMO it debatable both ways. But more concerning, how is the boy who got tackled? Did he make full recovery?
Divan Fuller
Samoan hit man 🥥
this is in South Africa numb nut lol
He tackled a player without the ball and tackled him with such force he ended up in a dangerous position. The rules clearly state you cant tackle a player without the ball or put them in a dangerous position.
There was no sound which is probably a good thing. The scream of a man having his soul ripped out is quite painful from what I have been told.
shu was a tough tackle! Feel sorry for the tackler and the tackled. Shouldn't have been a card. Totally legit
wrong, went past horizontal, should have been a red
Past horizontal straight red
Faaack. Is the guy ok?
Dit was n monster tackel. Eina. Op x.25 spoed is dit Nog steeds onder n sekonde, na die bal sy hande verlaat het. Dit is nie hoog nie! Wat was vout hier? ASB help my Verstaan?
He lands on his head maybe? He could have died?
@@Albusdumbledore840 then any tackle is dangerous. Go play soccer then. My comment was what the rules prescribed and proven correct.
Ok, he’s gone over the horizontal line so it’s illegal, any questions?
You don't know rugby. Full stop. It's a perfect tackle.@@Albusdumbledore840
Is the boy ok?
He had a coma
if you take the (even minutest) time to 'pull' the defence toward you, so you can free another person in your team to run free and get space to score a try, then you must face the consequence,...... (of being struck by a missile)
What’s the video called pla
Nothing wrong with this tackle.
M3th0d mah hy het nie en jou kennis van reels is verkeerd, dis n skoon tackle met niks fout nie monnas is mah net n meisie skiol dis al
Stfu...that tackle was an attemped murder
TheEddy797 neee jou nai. Di tackle was fine dis nog steeds ñ legal hit as di tackler se skouer an di hit oor di ander ou se skouer gly
@@brianfisher3470 jirre né die man heel bo is reg, die man is verby vertikaal getiep, jy weet mos nou dis illegal. En daai man wat getackle is, is poes toe. Hy kan maar net sowel die ou afstuur.
Bullshit if ever I've heard it. The tackler made contact below the should (legal) with so much force the ball carrier flipped. Late tackle again no he was committed. Easier for a referee to give a card rather than do his job. Lazy refereeing.
Kan sien hoekom die boitjie SAu18 span gemaak het. Miskien kom hy nog ver.
Booishaai!!!
Stupid ref he had a great view of the tackle amd still chose the card, nothing wrong with the tackle at all. Imagine being sent off for tackling somebody too hard. Embarasing...
It’s the tacklers responsibility to make sure the other player doesn’t land on his head, past the horizontal line. That kid did a flip and landed on his neck. By the rules that’s a red card and a suspension.
It was a tad bit late
Cheap shot on that poor kid. Ball had already left the hands before contact & tackler knew he wasn't going to make it. Pathetic.
I was next to the field that day, he was 100% committed to the tackle. Nothing wrong with the tackle, was below his shoulders. If you cant take a tackle dont play rugby
@@nicolaasmostert5577 As I said, he knew he wasn't going to make the tackle on time, whether he was committed or not. It's not about being able to take a tackle Mr tough guy.....
@@nicolaasmostert5577 ok so the guy dies with a broken neck then tell his family that....easy when you are not in that position
It’s a big shot on a much smaller player. Nothing tough about it at all.
Pussy. Its rugby you know what you are getting into when you step on the field no matter your size
What a dumd ass comment.Maybe the little guy should play something else.Knob
dont play rugby if youre too small.
nothing tough about being that small and playing rugby. kid should work out and eat or play another sport. if he cant eat and train properly for the sport thats on him. Soccer is VERY popular in south africa. I'm sure there are other non contact sports at his school.
The basic fact is that rugby is not a participation trophy sport. and its not a sport about picking on guys your own size. if you want fair weight matchups the kid should do boxing or wrestling.
this is rugby. bigger stronger guys and smaller more agile guys compete against eachother to cause scores and prevent scores.
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger do not tackle like if you are in the NFL
held onto the ball alil too long there bro.. a split second is all it takes...
The ball had gone. No restraint
Only yellow!!!!
Good, hard tackle... just physics there... weight and momentum.
yellow card for hitting someone too hard in rugby? wtf?
Rugbys a game for girls now days
Yep my response as well. Can the just as well delete rugby altotgether
@@amatmc8319 pretty much by the looks of the snowflakes comments
Oh shit!!
That was a completely legal tackle why is he getting a card
Legs went over the horizontal... Illegal. Should be red
@@luke515 are you dumb
he had the ball when he was tackled it wasnt high think about that
@@luke515 thats not the rule. the rule is you cant lift the legs over the head. not that their head cant pass their hips and any time.
@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger go read the rule! besides how does the player go through the horizontal manage to land on his head first without being lifted off the ground! red card all the way home. The definition of horizontal is when your head goes past your hips and legs, have some common sense jeez
@@PanicMechanic it doesnt say you cant be lifted off the ground. it says the hips cant be lifted above the head. not the head cant go below the hips. the tackle that is illegal are when you spear their head into the ground, not when you hit them so hard they leave their feet.
A yellow card for what? Executing a tackle so perfectly that it looks illegal?
legal? so he goes past horizontal and lands first on head and neck? should have been a red
@@PanicMechanic you make absolutely no sense. Nothing in the technique of the tackle made the kid land on his head, it was the force. Are we gonna start telling kids to tackle softer now?
@@BeskuitenBroffie no, but you can see the intent to cause injury and that's playing the man not the ball and frankly not in the spirit of the game! Secondly it's all about technique chop! The technique use was to go higher than the hips and thus causing the issue of going through the horizontal. But hey clearly safety doesn't come first for you, maybe one day when your son gets hit like that and ends up paralyzed or potentially getting a life altering injury then you will be on the other side of the fence and bitch and moan then...
@@PanicMechanic it was a bigger player that hit a smaller player so hard that he went past the horizontal line. Perfect technique. The only way in which he could’ve safely landed in this situation was if he had tackled him softer. I hope that is not what you are suggesting, If so there is a sport with a round ball where pussies kick it into a net that you might enjoy watching.
@@TheBloodSportExpress First of all when you start with because one player is bigger than the other i already know you don't know the laws and you wont know how its applied either! Laws say nothing about player size only about player safety and that its the responsibilities of the tackling player! The only way to tackle is softer to prevent that? are you maybe blind? he had to go lower! its extremely close to being high so maybe go learn to read before getting but hurt over facts! no wonder you lot in SA complain about the refs so much, don't actually know the laws.
Why the yellow card?
player went beyond the horizontal and landed on his head
@@PanicMechanic if you lift someone past the horizontal then yes, but that guy just got tackled the shit out of him and his so small that he justed flipped
@@nicolaasmostert5577 that's the reason why he went past the horizontal! laws make no provision for how a player gets lifted and includes not directly lifting the player straight up first (this would be the "Tip" tackle which is different these are also know as the spearing of a player or dunking which are generally the easiest to give straight reds) In this case the players feet go over his head meaning he had to go beyond the horizontal and also means player had to be lifted, which then makes its the tackling players responsibility for safety and reason for the card
pitty it was about 2 seconds after he passed the ball..other than that it was fine
Not even a second
He hit him, before his team mate caught the ball & the pass was only about a metre wide,
Not even close. Not even one sec.
The fact to remember is, this is school rugby. Yes, it is a fair tackle, but really, is it necessary to risk serious injury to the guy you are tackling by going into the tackle like that. Play hard, but play fair. What if you were the much smaller guy on the receiving side of the tackle. The force was totally unnecessary.
Shitting on the little guy
Legal or illegal that was completely unnecessary, very unsportsmanlike by that kid.
So playing a sport to 100% of your abilities are unsportsmanlike?. Wow. . Who would have thought.
@@martinwolmarans1833 your ability to play this sport is not measured by how hard you hit someone. He could’ve still been perfect without trying to kill him.
How are those 2 players in the same weight grade???
I feel bad for the bloke that went down but the tackle was fair. It was a great hit. That referee shouldnt be there again this referee games because he doesn't know what he's doing
Landed on his head. He literally cartwheel'd him bruh
Horrible tackle, go to NFL if you want to do that
@@martinjugolin2087 what's wrong with the tackle?
@@tsaki_titan too high, he launched himself at him without proper grappling and technique, no control
@@martinjugolin2087 too high??!😳it's like you don't know rugby rules, that was just a dangerous tackle without anything wrong with the tackler. The tackler is probably 90+kg against a scrum half, of course he's gonna fucking kill that kid cause he came at speed, the tackle was just wrekcless but he did everything right. Are you from the northern hemisphere?
Not a high tackle... Maar n BOISHAAI tackle
Not high...has arms out but doesn't get the wrap and loses all control and does not bring player to the ground safely. Infact brings player to ground very unsafely. Bordering on red card...imo....very dangerous.
If you pause the video at the right time you’ll see that he does wrap his arms. It was a bigger player that hit a smaller player with so much force that he got flipped. He did not pick him up and dunk him. The only way to have put him dow safely in this situation would’ve been to tackle him softer.
Unnecessary, dangerous and reckless. Should have been suspended
Ouch
If hed tackled him before releasing ball fair enough but either way it was reckless and dangerous good decision ref yellow card ,had a ring of out to do damage to it
Fair game to me.
Dit is Vuller
Doss mode
Too much risk for serious injury in this sport
Ag jirre gaan huil iewers ander🖕
Don't play it then. There is risk of serious injury in rock climbing.
then play another. thats what makes this fun. thats like saying theres too much risk in MMA or rock climbing. yes, thats what this game is about, thats what makes it fun.
@@delailama736 lol i didnt even see your comment when i first mentioned rock climbing lol
Not nice to see but its all about rugby and nothing wrong very nice if no injuries in such cases
Slightly late but no way it's a penalty.
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
The amount of people in the comments that dont understand the laws of rugby is shocking! no wonder they give South Africans a hard time about complaining about refs! its because they dont understand the rules
😀😀
I've played rugby since i was 5 years old. That was a cheap shot. The ball was gone. The guy probably coudlnt fully pull out of the tackle but he drove as hard as he could with his shoulder through the guys neck. There will be no next generation of rugby players because parents watching that will just say "no thank you".
There was no shoulder to the neck
Cheap shot hit just after he passed arms raised not impressed
Yo wtf
boy just got clapped
Kak referee.Daar was niks vekreerd met daardie tackle nie
Ek verstaan ook nie seker omdat hy op sy nek geland het
@Alex it wasn’t a lift. The force of the tackle on a smaller player is what turned him. Nothing the player could have done differently in his technique except not hit him as hard. Not dangerous play. We shouldn’t penalize the player for being physical. We should question the coach why he selected someone who clearly isn’t physically ready to play at that level
@@megatom210 this is the truth
@@megatom210 Doesnt have to be a lift! its at any time that the tackled player goes past the horizontal! people need to go read the laws. Rules are there for a reason! easy to say that shouldn't penalize that player for being physical yet could have broken someone's neck by being reckless, yes it was reckless
@@PanicMechanic its only when lifting someones legs above his head that its dangerous play, if you weigh as much as an rugby ball then dont play this sport, im and old boy of that school and saw it al happening infront of me. 100% nothing wrong there, cant help the guy is as light as a feather
Gara2 tiktok kemari
the guy just looks at him crumbling down and walks on....some humanity shown there.....would not want him to be a doctor or in the medical industry
Nothing wrong with that
plenty wrong with it
Nothing wrong with the tackle ref. its rugby not soccer!
read the laws about tackling a player first then come back and comment
@@PanicMechanic ok Brandon! I will go right now and read the great and almighty tackling law book and be right back to comment 👍
@@siunipataiseni5932 good stuff hopefully you learn something.... Actually who we kidding here you too full of it to admit that you are wrong 🤣
@@PanicMechanic was that you that got smashed!!! 😭 are you playing soccer now 👨💻
@@siunipataiseni5932 hahaha yeah I thought I would be right... Maybe should go back to school to ask for a refund because you still can't read
#buy bitcoin
For starters its a verrrrry late tackle then he fails to control the player her brought down who ended up landing dangerously
It's not a late tackle
Verrry late? Not sure if you can count one second and subtract from that?? Probably not
That's a bully style tackle... Huge guy going all out on little guy.
Dont play opens if your scared of being hit by big guys. Theres no rules around size, what you want the bigger guys to do, let the small fast guys run around them?
Big guys have to play to their strengths, using their size, small guys their agility and speed. Nothing wrong with that hit.
Imagine you switch the 2 players and small guy destroys big guy, how come thats fine now? Doesn't make sense.
@@amatmc8319 This isnt opens ! what makes you believe that its opens? clearly in the video description that its u/14 or cant you read just like you cant read the rugby law books about whats a fair tackle and that taking someone beyond the horizontal and them ending on their head first is illegal
@@amatmc8319 not just the description but in the video itself it shows u/14!
Late tackle
No it was under a second chom
Good hard tackle, no card
This wasn't good at all
Straigh red.. it was late, barely used his arms, and was excessively reckless.
Jys n soutie bra
@@Kashewz7693 jy is die oorspronklike soutie
Jys fokken blind
Hkm was hy n geel kaar gegee
Ninjas Nelt hulle het gese die tackle was laat. Maar die laaitie maak gereeld groot tackles
@@paulbasson2441 oooo jitte maar wat is sy naam
Ninjas Nelt dis Divan of so iets
@@rheinieconel342 divan fuller
Want hierdie is `n sport, nie `n veldslag nie. Dit was `n kleinerige mannetjie daai, hy moes homself bietjie ingeperk het. Redelike hoog gevat - jy tackle `n man se bene - nie sy bolyf nie. As sy bors te naby is aan die grond vir jou? Wel dalk is hy `n laaitjie in vergelyking met jou. Dit was uiters gevaarlik - dis nie `n geval van "all gloves are off" nie.
Late Tackle.
Late & reckless. Should be walking.
nah. youre a pussy
@@kevinflynn9715 Forget your personal hang ups for a moment Kevin. Rugby is just a game and the rules are the rules. In this instance the balls long gone, so the tackle is late. The tackler has no control over the player once he launches into the tackle, so it’s reckless.
@@MrRhythmicnodding yeah i just dont think a half second is long gone.
@@MrRhythmicnodding i agree with kevin you sound like a pussy. Its rugby you get hit hard. Ball had just left his hands.
@@amatmc8319 “it’s rugby you get hit hard” absolutely Mitchell, that’s why the rules are there to keep players safe and the game fair. Nothing better in rugby than a tough hard hit well timed and within the rules of the game. Nothing worse in rugby than illegal play that endangers others, and someone on the sideline shouting pussy at people.
I can understand you saying the tackle was only a fraction late, but that is unfortunately still late.
show me a guy that can drive a 160kmph cricket ball through the covers any day of the week, but this is just a stupid sport. High School boy over here got tackled over here in my province and ended up paralyzed for the rest of his life because of this macho man sport. The High School teams over here keep talking about their big tackles and hurting the other players every monday....but they lost the game. Huge bully sport imo..
Apparently balet is your sport then. Or lawn bowls. One of the two
Vuilgat
Dan ken jy nie rugby nie
@@Zy-xt7wy gaan kyk die video oor en pause waar hy tackle,eerstens vat hy hom net net onder sy arms,tweedens was sy bene oor 360th grade,jy ken ni
@@taztrellis2914 my chom jy reply nou eers?
@@Zy-xt7wy want ek kyk nou eers die comments
@@taztrellis2914 Wat is vout met net inder sy arms?
Disgusting tackle, go to the NFL if you want to do that. Who is going to pay his medical bills?
This clip is on Instagram. Holy shot but the snowflakes there🤨 Pretty much calling it a dog shit whatever that means, cheap shot blah blah blah. etc. Makes your head spin. We all played. If you can't handle a good tackle stay off the field.
Yo wtf
Late tackle