Asrar Rashid Caught Slandering Ibn Taymiyya! - Dividing Tawheed Into Three Categories

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 112

  • @ibmsulaymani
    @ibmsulaymani  3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    2:08 - The book that was mentioned was written by Shaykh Abdurrazzaq Al Badr where he refutes those who say that dividing tawheed into three categories is a “wahabi” innovation. The book can be purchased here - www.sifatusafwa.com/en/at-tawheed-wa-ash-shirk/rebuttal-to-those-who-deny-the-categorization-of-tawheed-abderrazzaq-al-badr.html
    Asrar Rashid was caught slandering Ibn Taymiyya where he implied that Ibn Taymiyya was the first person to divide tawheed into three categories, Ibn Taymiyya was only following that which came before him.

    • @sajidmahmood4238
      @sajidmahmood4238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you get this book in English translation

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Even pagans believed in Allah's Rubbubiyah/Lordship but you have to worship, invoke Allah alone (Making him your God)
      Quran 31 :25. And if you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) *ask them: "Who has created the heavens and the earth," they will certainly say: "Allah."* Say: "All the praises and thanks be to Allah!" But most of them know not.
      ...
      30. That is because *Allah, He is the Truth, and that which they invoke besides Him is Al-Batil* (falsehood, Satan and all other false deities); and that Allah, He is the Most High, the Most Great.
      31. See you not that the ships sail through the sea by Allah's Grace that He may show you of His Signs? Verily, in this are signs for every patient, grateful (person).
      32. *And when a wave covers them like shades, they invoke Allah, making their invocations for Him only. But when He brings them safe to land, there are among them those that stop in between (Belief and disbelief).* But none denies Our Signs except every perfidious ingrate.
      In Summary, Lord = Creator's Action, God = One Served (tied to our acts) as taught by and for the Creator.
      Quran 11 : 101 - *We wronged them not, but they wronged themselves. So their alihah (gods), other than Allah, whom they invoked, profited them naught when there came the Command of your Lord,* nor did they add aught to them but destruction.
      Ok Now...
      Sufis (doebandis or barevelis half shias, pay attention too here :)
      Quran 72 : 20. Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): *"I invoke only my Lord (Allah Alone),* and I associate none as partners along with Him."
      21. *Say: "It is not in my power to cause you harm, or to bring you to the Right Path."*
      Quran 40
      60. And your Lord said: *"Invoke Me, [(Islamic Monotheism) and ask Me for anything] I will respond to your (invocation). Verily! Those who scorn My worship [i.e. do not invoke Me, and do not believe in My Oneness,] they will surely enter Hell in humiliation!"*
      65. He is the Ever Living, La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He); *so invoke Him making your worship pure for Him Alone* (and not to show off, and not setting up rivals with Him in worship). All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (all that exists).

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The history of 3 categories of Tawhid is in a book by Abdur Razzaq al Badr called evidences for categories of Tawhid, its online in english pdf. as well!
      Abu Hanifah (D. 150 H.) And Allah is to be called upon Upwards, not downwards, because lowness is not from the description of Ruboobiyyah and Uloohiyyah. - Fiqhul Asbat p. 51.
      Ibn Battah al-Ukbaree (D. 395 H.) said in his work (الإبانة عن شريعة الفرقة الناجية), "al-Ibaanah", (2/172-173):
      And this is because the foundation of al-eemaan (faith) in Allah whose belief is obligatory upon the creation in affirmation of of belief in Him is [comprised of] three things:
      The first of them: That the slave believe in his Rabbaaniyyah (his Lordship over all creation) so that by this he separates from the doctrine of the negators who do not affirm a maker (creator).
      And the second: That he believes in his Wahdaaniyyah (his sole right to be worshipped) so that by this he separates from the people of shirk (associationism) who affirm the Maker (Creator) but they associated others with Him in worship.
      And the third: That he believes Him be to be described with [such] attributes which are not permitted except for Him to be described with, such as knowledge (ilm), power (qudrah), wisdom (hikmah) and all of what He has descrbed Himself with in His Book.
      Since we know that many of those who affirm Him (in His Rabbaaniyyah) and single Him out [in His Wahdaaniyyah] with a generalized saying, but who deviate in [the subject of] His Attributes, and thus his deviation in the Attributes is damaging to His Tawhid. And also because we find that Allaah, the Most High, has addressed His slaves by inviting them to have belief in all of these three types and to have faith in them.

    • @thatmuslimguy6495
      @thatmuslimguy6495 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      store.sunnahpublishing.net/product/the-beneficial-summary-in-clarifying-the-evidence-for-the-categories-of-tawheed/

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thatmuslimguy6495 the pdf for that is also online btw.

  • @rayanrahmoune1064
    @rayanrahmoune1064 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    He said his time is full of barakah.
    May Allah bless you brother.

  • @nafeesiqbal1538
    @nafeesiqbal1538 3 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    The fact that Ustaadh ARH mentioned Abu Hanifa alone is enough to dismantle and destroy Asrar Rashid point. These people who claim to be Hanafi are only Hanafi in fiqh but not in aqeedah. May Allah Subhana Wa Ta Alaa safeguard and protect the honour of this noble Imaam because the people have hijacked his name and unfortunately attributing false beliefs in his name and mathab. He is our Imaam (ie from the Salaf as Saaliheen) and not the Imaam of the Mutakallimeen.

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Fisabilillah فِي سَبِيلِ ٱللَّٰهِ Whats the book, is it also in english by any chance?

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      All 4 MAthhabs were Athari... Asharis compromised between Athari and Mtuazilah doctrine, Imam Ashari as he got older became closer to Athari!

    • @lenoblecoran2
      @lenoblecoran2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@عبودالقمري-ص5ب fear Allah

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MuwahhidNeef He didn't travel, he missed many hadiths, he used lots of qiyas which is in fiqh science replaced when hadiths add details!

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MuwahhidNeef what's my slander or how am I extreme because I am against both? be specific!
      Tell me if you aren't a projecting slandering extremist who I pray Allah deals with then!

  • @ahmadfared1204
    @ahmadfared1204 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What ustad Abdul ar rahman said is true for the proof
    And most of them believe not in Allah except that they
    attribute partners unto Him.
    Ibn Abbas commented,
    "They have a part of faith, for when they are
    asked, `Who created the heavens? Who created
    the earth? Who created the mountains?' They
    say, `Allah did.' Yet, they associate others with
    Him in worship.''
    Similar is said by Mujahid, Ata, Ikrimah, Ash￾Sha`bi, Qatadah, Ad-Dahhak and Abdur-Rahman
    bin Zayd bin Aslam.

  • @zaks3144
    @zaks3144 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    He wants to come there with his stick like a wise man 😂😂

    • @whyalwaysmegod7684
      @whyalwaysmegod7684 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Its sunnah dumdum

    • @zaks3144
      @zaks3144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@whyalwaysmegod7684 Masha Allah we must follow sunnah in all aspects not only look the part

    • @hammadsiddiqui8421
      @hammadsiddiqui8421 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@zaks3144so why you mocking part of the sunnah

    • @zaks3144
      @zaks3144 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm mocking the guy that has no basis in any hadith or quran for celebrating mawlid but wants to look the part with a stick. You guys are the biggest joke in the Ummah .

    • @GO_142
      @GO_142 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@whyalwaysmegod7684 It's a sunnah ??Wheres the proof for this as muslims when we say somethoing we have to verrify and you have to mention where you got this from

  • @osamamanan2723
    @osamamanan2723 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    All ahlul biddah hate Ibn taimiyya. I like how Ustadh cleaned him up by bringing 20 scholars from the salaf. The face of Asrar changed dramatically.

    • @osamamanan2723
      @osamamanan2723 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @jj-yi1ne nauzubillah

    • @faraazsiddiqui1450
      @faraazsiddiqui1450 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@jj-yi1neYour Greek philosophy aqeeda people are Ahlul bidah who thinks that they know more than scholars of hadith.Ibn Taymiyyah rahimullah gives evidences and quotes scholars of salaf not like your Greek philosophers who interpret the verses according to their desires.

    • @hassamkhalil6603
      @hassamkhalil6603 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ibn taymiyyah said Allah has limits and directions in his book bayaan talbis al jahmiyah. He made a lot of points whether correct or not using his own reasoning and modern scholar attribute it to what the salaf believed. Modern salafis follow about 5-6 sheikhs across the entire history of Islam and most are modern

    • @hassamkhalil6603
      @hassamkhalil6603 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@faraazsiddiqui1450so what’s the evidence for him saying Allah has limits and size. You must know his works well so please enlighten me. Sheikh bin baz himself hasn’t read his book bayaan tablis al jamiyah where a lot of these views are stated. How can a scholar follow everything another scholar says and then refuse to read one of his books

    • @osamamanan2723
      @osamamanan2723 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hassamkhalil6603 Allah said He is over arsh. Which is a place and direction. Its based on apparent meaning not aqal.

  • @callertoallaahexaltedmosth8075
    @callertoallaahexaltedmosth8075 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    His face when realising gives him away lol

    • @hammadsiddiqui8421
      @hammadsiddiqui8421 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you’re telling me Asrar didn’t realise this before ?

    • @waqasraza688
      @waqasraza688 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@hammadsiddiqui8421he truly had not read it as Ustad had thought so.

    • @hammadsiddiqui8421
      @hammadsiddiqui8421 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@waqasraza688 you sound so confident in this claim

    • @waqasraza688
      @waqasraza688 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@hammadsiddiqui8421 I mean he appeared to.

  • @kalijasin
    @kalijasin ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Islam is actually quite simple and easy to understand. Its not as complicated and confusing as these Muslims Make it out to be.

    • @hassamkhalil6603
      @hassamkhalil6603 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The basics are simple which we have to adhere to but there’s plenty of stuff which is ambiguous. 3:7 in the Quran even states that there’s ambiguous things

    • @humanaccount2754
      @humanaccount2754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hassamkhalil6603word it better brother. “ambiguous” verses means ones that can have many interpretations. The majority of the Qur’aan is muHkam (clear cut) . The people of deviance always take the ambiguous and ignore basically the clear cut.

  • @DONN-24
    @DONN-24 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There should only be sunnah! Quran and hadith and worship the way our prophet pbuh worshipped through the hadith,
    I'm Pakistani and can tell you the people have still not let go of their Hindu traditions and perform shirkh

    • @yaznhanfi9090
      @yaznhanfi9090 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      الله يهديهم يارب

  • @Abdullah34610
    @Abdullah34610 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The book in English is (I think) "The Beneficial Summary in Clarifiying the Evidences for the Categories of Tawheed By Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin Al-Abbad".
    If I'm wrong, please correct me.

    • @محمد-س3ك9ج
      @محمد-س3ك9ج 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was the book by sh abbad or his son sheikh abdurazzaq al badr
      Also do you have a pdf of it?

    • @humanaccount2754
      @humanaccount2754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@محمد-س3ك9جthe son. see the pinned comment there is a link to it.
      u can also check the following websites:
      darmakkah
      salafibookstore (not entirely pro spubs but good store! اللهم بارك)
      sifatsafwa (tiny bit expensive)
      safinatul najaah
      darussalam
      thats about all i can think of

  • @muhammadabulnumaan
    @muhammadabulnumaan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Asrar face at the end of the video loooool

  • @al-aleem
    @al-aleem 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    MashaAllah ! May Allah preserve the shaykh..

  • @Iamfsaly
    @Iamfsaly ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I won’t be surprised he is a Sufi he mentioned this himself

    • @yassine073t
      @yassine073t หลายเดือนก่อน

      The mask fell 😂

  • @IbnAbdssalam
    @IbnAbdssalam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    اللهم بارك نسأل الله أن ينفع بالشيخ و يبارك فيه ❤️❤️

  • @housse51
    @housse51 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can i get link into the full debate?

  • @thestargazer6335
    @thestargazer6335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It might be a mistake not a lie, don't haste in judging someone, just to pull him down, such a shame!

    • @ibmsulaymani
      @ibmsulaymani  3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Ok I’ll change the title into slandering instead of lying

    • @osamamanan2723
      @osamamanan2723 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Propagating something from hear sake without proper investigation is lying. Such person is called a liar even by prophet A.S.

    • @thestargazer6335
      @thestargazer6335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@osamamanan2723 Human commit mistakes, you seem to be from angel's community.

    • @Abdullah-wd6vn
      @Abdullah-wd6vn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Keep star gazing (cuckoo land )

    • @MohamedShou
      @MohamedShou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ibmsulaymani typical salafi and wahhabi logic anybody that makes a mistake *especially a fellow Muslim* you guys say “slandering, lying, hypocrite, misguided, deviant” etc etc 🤦🏾‍♂️. Alhamdulillah I’m not a salafi or Abdul Wahhab follower

  • @MohamedShou
    @MohamedShou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I respect both these guys and may Allah guide us and them

  • @tiktokasylum5186
    @tiktokasylum5186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No mushrik has any aspect of iman once they disbelieve in one aspect they don’t believe in the others... there is no ilah than allah and allah is specified in the Quran anyone who disbelieves in aspect of his oneness disbelieved in Allah... just because the Arab Christians say they believe in Allah doesn’t make the Allah in the bible the same as the Allah in the Quran... as soon as they believe Allah has partners they don’t believe in Allah anymore we don’t know what god that is...
    It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah b. Mas'ud that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) observed:
    None shall enter the Fire (of Hell) who has in his heart the weight of a mustard seed of Iman and none shall enter Paradise who has in his heart the weight of a mustard seed of pride.
    حَدَّثَنَا مِنْجَابُ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ التَّمِيمِيُّ، وَسُوَيْدُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، كِلاَهُمَا عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ مُسْهِرٍ، - قَالَ مِنْجَابٌ أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ مُسْهِرٍ، - عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ لاَ يَدْخُلُ النَّارَ أَحَدٌ فِي قَلْبِهِ مِثْقَالُ حَبَّةِ خَرْدَلٍ مِنْ إِيمَانٍ وَلاَ يَدْخُلُ الْجَنَّةَ أَحَدٌ فِي قَلْبِهِ مِثْقَالُ حَبَّةِ خَرْدَلٍ مِنْ كِبْرِيَاءَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
    Reference : Sahih Muslim 91b
    In-book reference : Book 1, Hadith 172
    USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 1, Hadith 16

    • @ibmsulaymani
      @ibmsulaymani  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Asrar Rashid has a wrong understanding. Ibn Jarir Al Tabari in his tafseer affirmed that many mushrikeen would make dua to Allah alone in times of hardship. Here is the proof if you don’t trust me - twitter.com/brehsan2/status/1436013614947766278?s=21

    • @WU-HU-XI-LIAN-DA_STRIKE
      @WU-HU-XI-LIAN-DA_STRIKE ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Allah himselfs affirms imaan in the mushrikeen

  • @rayanrahmoune1064
    @rayanrahmoune1064 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this man

  • @abuzarmahmood96
    @abuzarmahmood96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    watch the entire video and you will get the answer.

  • @hamidaliyzp7892
    @hamidaliyzp7892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mashallah...
    Well caught

  • @ghoosaindramat1581
    @ghoosaindramat1581 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Asrar is 100 % correct Ibn Taymiyya devided the Ummah he will have to face the consequences Qiyamah

    • @ibmsulaymani
      @ibmsulaymani  3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      So according to you Ibn Jarir Al Tabari must also face the consequences as he divided tawheed as well.

    • @everygoodisinwhatthesalafb7613
      @everygoodisinwhatthesalafb7613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YES HE DIVIDED THE UMMAH BETWEEN THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE PROPHETS (s.a.w) PATH AND THE INNOVATORS. THIS UMMAH WILL ONLY BE UNITED UPON WHAT THE PROPHET BROUGHT (right aqeeda) UNITING THIS UMMAH UPON INNOVATION THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN . HADITH THAT SAYS MY UPON WILL SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS WILL YOU DENY THE HADITH? . AND YOU WANT TO UNITE THIS UMMAH (RAFIDAH , ISMAILIA, AHMEDIYA ,the list goes on .

    • @Iron_Ottoman
      @Iron_Ottoman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don’t worry imam Mahdi will reunite us inshallah

    • @selfresurgence4394
      @selfresurgence4394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@Iron_Ottoman upon the manhaj as salaf as saliheen

    • @WU-HU-XI-LIAN-DA_STRIKE
      @WU-HU-XI-LIAN-DA_STRIKE ปีที่แล้ว

      @@selfresurgence4394 Alhamdulillah of the salaf as saleheen

  • @tiktokasylum5186
    @tiktokasylum5186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don’t trust AH anymore his already shown to be a individual who is a weak narrator.. his a distorter I would have to look this up myself.. he said Jalil al tabri tafsir of surah al Fatiha..

    • @ibmsulaymani
      @ibmsulaymani  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If you don’t trust him that’s up to you, I can’t force you to listen to someone. As mentioned in the video, Shaykh Abdurrazzaq Al Badr authored a book proving the categorization of tawheed into 3 branches. You can purchase the book here - www.sifatusafwa.com/en/at-tawheed-wa-ash-shirk/rebuttal-to-those-who-deny-the-categorization-of-tawheed-abderrazzaq-al-badr.html

    • @tiktokasylum5186
      @tiktokasylum5186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ibmsulaymani I’m ok with categorising tawheed but I’m not ok with saying mushrakeen believe In one aspect of tawheed... as soon as you worship partners with Allah yo have denied all aspects of tawheed ... it’s a hypocrisy and a oxymoron... how can a idol worship believe in Allah as the law giver if he did he wouldn’t worship others with him.. which can only mean this idea of Allah been a law giver ( to him) was a deficient one and a flawed one and to the understand of Islam and how we see Allah as been the law giver..

    • @jagenaught
      @jagenaught 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tiktokasylum5186 Akhi what you're oj with and what you're not ok with are different to what the reality is. The Arab pagans did ascribe Allah's Tawḥīd al-Rubūbiyya. They never denied his Lordship but they failed in the rest.
      Allah stated in Sūrah Yunus, (Āyah 31):
      قُلْ مَن يَرْزُقُكُم مِّنَ السَّمَاءِ وَالْأَرْضِ أَمَّن يَمْلِكُ السَّمْعَ وَالْأَبْصَارَ وَمَن يُخْرِجُ الْحَيَّ مِنَ الْمَيِّتِ وَيُخْرِجُ الْمَيِّتَ مِنَ الْحَيِّ وَمَن يُدَبِّرُ الْأَمْرَ ۚ فَسَيَقُولُونَ اللَّهُ ۚ فَقُلْ أَفَلَا تَتَّقُونَ - 10:31
      “Say to them, O Prophet, ‘Who is the one who provides you with sustenance from the sky, and from the earth? Who is the one who owns the hearing and He owns the sights, the one who brings life out of the dead and the one who brings the dead out of the living? Who is the one who controls all of the affairs of the universe?’” They will say, “It is Allah.” So say to them O Prophet: “Will you not fear Him and will you not be dutiful to Him?”
      The three categories go together without any doubt and one without the other makes you a kaafir. In the grave for instance there are 2 questions as you know. You can't get 1 out of 3 or 2 out of 3. You get one you get the rest and you miss one you fail the rest and you're finished.

    • @ahmedammar10
      @ahmedammar10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tiktokasylum5186 it's understood that the other parts of Tawheed are flawed when one part is missing completely. However, it is not a complete lack of any Tawheed.

    • @justabrother356
      @justabrother356 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      “And indeed if you ask them: ‘Who has created the heavens and the earth?’ They will surely say: ‘The All-Mighty, the All-Knower created them’”
      [al-Zukhruf 43:9]
      “And if you were to ask them: ‘Who has created the heavens and the earth and subjected the sun and the moon?’ they will surely reply: ‘Allah.’ How then are they deviating (as polytheists and disbelievers)?”
      [al-'Ankabut 29:61]
      “And if you were to ask them: ‘Who sends down water (rain) from the sky, and gives life therewith to the earth after its death?’ they will surely reply: ‘Allah.’ Say: ‘All the praises and thanks be to Allah!’ Nay, most of them have no sense”
      [al-‘Ankabut 29:63]
      “And if you ask them who created them, they will surely say: ‘Allah.’ How then are they turned away (from the worship of Allah Who created them)?”
      [al-Zukhruf 43:87]
      In these verses Allah states that the kuffar affirm that He is the Creator, Sovereign and Controller, but despite that they do not worship Him alone (Tawhid of worship), which points to the graveness of their wrongdoing and lies, and the weakness of their reasoning. For if there is One Who is described in such terms, none should be worshipped except Him Alone and none should be described as being one and unique except Him; may He be glorified above those that they associate with Him.
      So whoever affirms this Tawhid in the true sense must inevitably also affirm the Oneness of Allah’s Divinity (Tawhid al-Uluhiyyah).