According to a video featuring Sheikh Suleyman Ruheyli, it was suggested to Sheikh Bin Baz by Sh Saleh Ala Shaykh that the section in the book "As-Sunnah" by Abdullah ibn Ahmed, containing narrations from the Salaf that speak negatively about Imam Abu Hanifa, should be removed. Sheikh Bin Baz reportedly approved of this suggestion. th-cam.com/video/Arcxk-8rA5A/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EAz3edQsvBJ76zYb P.S There is no contradiction in the video of following the way of the salaf providing you don’t make it sectarian and that’s what every Muslim should be doing while at the same time you follow a madhab when it comes to Fiqhi related matters. Also I acknowledge that some of the salaf said some very negative things about Abu Hanifah, however the scholars have *unanimously agreed* on his imamship and him being a magnificent scholar later on down the line as stated by ibn Taymiyyah and other than him. Why do I keep quoting ibn Taymiyyah? As mentioned in the 5 hour podcast, Imam At Thahabi said about him: “ He (ibn Taymiyyah) has in depth understanding when knowing the positions of the companions & the tabieen.” And also because he is a household name that is widely accepted by those who ascribe to salafism. • Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said: *❝Whoever assumes that Abū Ḥanīfah or any other Imām of the Muslims intentionally contradicts authentic aḥādīth based on qiyās (analogical reasoning) or other reasons, then he has erred in his judgement and speaks either based on conjecture or personal desires. This is Abū Ḥanīfah, who acts upon the ḥadīth of using nabīdh for medicinal purposes during travel, contrary to qiyās, and the ḥadīth of laughter during prayer, despite contradicting qiyās. He believes in their authenticity, even though the scholars of ḥadīth did not authenticate them. We have clarified this in the treatise “Raf’ al-Malam ‘An al-A’immat al-A’lām” and demonstrated that none of the Imāms of Islām contradict an authentic ḥadīth without justification. They have numerous excuses, such as not having been informed of the ḥadīth or receiving it from a source they do not trust or whose implications they do not consider conclusive evidence. They may also believe that the evidence presented is outweighed by stronger evidence, such as abrogation (nāsikh) or indications of abrogation and similar factors.❞* ومَن ظَنَّ بِأبِي حَنِيفَةَ أوْ غَيْرِهِ مِن أئِمَّةِ المُسْلِمِينَ أنَّهُمْ يَتَعَمَّدُونَ مُخالَفَةَ الحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ لِقِياسِ أوْ غَيْرِهِ فَقَدْ أخْطَأ عَلَيْهِمْ وتَكَلَّمَ إمّا بِظَنِّ وإمّا بِهَوى فَهَذا أبُو حَنِيفَةَ يَعْمَلُ بِحَدِيثِ التوضي بِالنَّبِيذِ فِي السَّفَرِ مُخالَفَةً لِلْقِياسِ وبِحَدِيثِ القَهْقَهَةِ فِي الصَّلاةِ مَعَ مُخالَفَتِهِ لِلْقِياسِ؛ لِاعْتِقادِهِ صِحَّتَهُما وإنْ كانَ أئِمَّةُ الحَدِيثِ لَمْ يُصَحِّحُوهُما. وقَدْ بَيَّنّا هَذا فِي رِسالَةِ «رَفْعِ المَلامِ عَنْ الأئِمَّةِ الأعْلامِ» وبَيَّنّا أنَّ أحَدًا مِن أئِمَّةِ الإسْلامِ لا يُخالِفُ حَدِيثًا صَحِيحًا بِغَيْرِ عُذْرٍ بَلْ لَهُمْ نَحْوٌ مِن عِشْرِينَ عُذْرًا مِثْلَ أنْ يَكُونَ أحَدُهُمْ لَمْ يَبْلُغْهُ الحَدِيثُ؛ أوْ بَلَغَهُ مِن وجْهٍ لَمْ يَثِقْ بِهِ أوْ لَمْ يَعْتَقِدْ دَلالَتَهُ عَلى الحُكْمِ؛ أوْ اعْتَقَدَ أنَّ ذَلِكَ الدَّلِيلَ قَدْ عارَضَهُ ما هُوَ أقْوى مِنهُ كالنّاسِخِ؛ أوْ ما يَدُلُّ عَلى النّاسِخِ وأمْثالُ ذَلِكَ. 📚 (Majmū’ al-Fatāwā 20/304-305) • Ibn al-Qayyim said: *❝Abū Yūsuf had sought Bishr al-Marīsī’s repentance when he denied that Allāh is above His Throne. This incident is well-known, mentioned by ‘Abd al-Raḥman Ibn Abī Ḥātim and others. The early followers of Abū Ḥanīfah have unanimously agreed upon this.* وَقَدِ اسْتَتَابَ أَبُو يُوسُفَ بِشْرًا الْمَرِيسِيَّ لَمَّا أَنْكَرَ أَنَّ اللَّهَ فَوْقَ عَرْشِهِ وَهِيَ قِصَّةٌ مَشْهُورَةٌ ذَكَرَهَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ وَغَيْرُهُ، وَأَصْحَابُ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ الْمُتَقَدِّمُونَ عَلَى هَذَا. *Muḥammad Ibn al-Ḥasan stated: “All of the jurists from the East to the West are unanimously agreed in having faith in the Qur'ān and the aḥādīth which came through the trustworthy narrators from the Prophet ﷺ on the description of the Lord without changing them, describing them nor likening them to creation. So whoever explained anything from them today, then he has departed from that which the Prophet ﷺ was upon and he has separated from Jamā’ah, for they did not describe and explain, however they gave verdicts upon what is in the Book and the Sunnah then they remained silent. So whoever spoke with the saying of Jahm, then he has separated from the Jamā’ah because he described Allāh with the description of a non-existent entity.”* قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ اتَّفَقَ الْفُقَهَاءُ كُلُّهُمْ مِنَ الْمَشْرِقِ إِلَى الْمَغْرِبِ عَلَى الْإِيمَانِ بِالْقُرْآنِ وَالْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ بِهَا الثِّقَاتُ عَنِ الرَّسُولِ فِي صِفَاتِ الرَّبِّ مِنْ غَيْرِ تَفْسِيرٍ وَلَا وَصْفٍ وَلَا تَشْبِيهٍ، فَمَنْ فَسَّرَ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَقَدْ خَرَجَ عَمَّا كَانَ عَلَيْهِ النَّبِيُّ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَإِنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَصِفُوا وَلَمْ يُفَسِّرُوا وَلَكِنْ آمَنُوا بِمَا فِي الْكُتُبِ وَالسُّنَّةِ ثُمَّ سَكَتُوا، فَمَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ؛ لِأَنَّهُ وَصَفَهُ بِصِفَةٍ لَا شَيْءَ. *Muḥammad - may Allāh have mercy upon him - also said: “Likewise the aḥādīth that mention Allāh descending to the lowest heaven and similar notions. These aḥādīth were narrated by trustworthy sources, and we transmit and believe in them without interpreting them.”* وَقَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى أَيْضًا فِي الْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى يَهْبِطُ إِلَى سَمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا وَنَحْوِ هَذَا، هَذِهِ الْأَحَادِيثُ قَدْ رَوَاهَا الثِّقَاتُ فَنَحْنُ نَرْوِيهَا وَنُؤْمِنُ بِهَا وَلَا نُفَسِّرُهَا، ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ *Abū al-Qāsim al-Lālakā’ī mentioned this, and this is proven from him that anyone who adheres to the views of Jahm has indeed separated from the Muslim community.* ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ *Al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned in the ‘aqīdah of Abū Ḥanīfah and his companions, may Allāh exalt their mention, that which aligns with this [belief]. They are the most innocent of people from ta’ṭīl and tajahhum. In his well-known creed, al-Ṭaḥāwī stated: “And He, the Exalted, encompasses everything and is above it, and his creation is incapable of encompassing Him.”❞* وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ الطَّحَاوِيُّ فِي اعْتِقَادِ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَصَاحِبَيْهِ رَحِمَهُمُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى مَا يُوَافِقُ هَذَا، وَأَنَّهُمْ أَبْرَأُ النَّاسِ مِنَ التَّعْطِيلِ وَالتَّجَهُّمِ، فَقَالَ فِي عَقِيدَتِهِ الْمَعْرُوفَةِ: وَأَنَّهُ تَعَالَى مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ، وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلَقَهُ. 📚 (Ijtimā’ al-Juyūsh al-Islāmīyyah p. 335-337)
Imam Abu Hanifa was one the biggest scholar of the Salaf, it is believed that he was also a Tabi'ee, giving him even more prestige. A Jahil like you is not in a position to question such a great Imam. @@randomhero6156
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN . TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
How are you brother WHICH IMAM MUST WE FOLLOW ❓ Followers of imams ( Madhabs) have decided all the four imams ( Madhabs) are correct, but we must ONLY follow ONE 🤦♂ The complete & perfected Islam existed before the arrival of the four great Imams. Allah did NOT instruct us to follow any imam. The Prophet P.B.U.H did NOT instruct us to follow any imam. The imams did NOT instruct us to follow them. All the four great imams said, if you find a hadith which contradicts what we have taught you then REJECT what we taught you ( This proves the target of all the four imams was to direct us to the Quran & Hadith ) A question for all those people who a follow an imam, are you ready to REJECT a Hadith to follow an imam 🤦🏻♂❓
Just met sheikh Abu Taymiyyah in Medina. What a humble, loving approachable Sheikh ❤. May Allah preserve you Sheikh you are changing lives for the better!
@@Yass-if6znI also saw him in Medina last week. I doubt he will be there much longer, but to be honest with you, me and the brother I was with just saw him and acknowledged the fact that it was him and walked past as we made our way to the safs for Fajr. Focus on your stay in the blessed lands, and do not spend energy thinking about who will be there etc.
Beautiful answers, I’m sick and tired of people disrespecting the imam they don’t follow. It’s disgraceful! All four were absolute mountains of knowledge and we respect the rulings and methodology by all!
Beautiful statements brought by our beloved Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah. I had the opportunity of meeting him in person in Medina during my Umrah. All I can say is that he's very humble and respectable and tall. He has a very pleasing personality and down to earth. May Allah preserve Shaykh Abu Taymiyyah.
shaiyk you have helped me so much on my journey. I don’t understand the hate, you genuinely feel like my personal shaiyk. May Allah preserve you and bless you
@@idk-ms8fe sheikh Ibu Taymiyyah, maybe his follow scholar ibn taymiah.... there are red flags attached to him, foloow sunii or sufi but do not follow salafi, they dint make mawlid, font go to the graves to pray for the one who left this world or get blessing, dont do tawassuf
I'm happy that there are still people like this shaykh who have understanding of Deen and are not confusing people by telling them to leave salaf and ulama
I have always admired how Ustad Abu Taymiyyah defends Imam Abu Hanifa and the other Imams in front of the world, even though he will face pushback and slander. This is what a lion of Islam looks like. May Allah preserve you brother.
If you think Abu hanifa is like Malik or Shafaee or Sufyan or Shu'ba or Al layth or Ahmed or Al Bukhari or other than them. Then you really don't have a clue about the salaf and the scholars in the second and third century.
Allahumma Baarik Ustadh for this video. There are people who claim to be Hanafi & are only Hanafi in fiqh but not in aqeedah. May Allah Subhana Wa Ta Alaa safeguard and protect the honour of this noble Imaam & have mercy on him & forgive him for his mistakes & short-comings because the people have hijacked his name and unfortunately attributing false beliefs in his name and mathab. He is (always has & always will be) "our" Imaam (ie from the Salaf as Saaliheen) and not the Imaam of the Mutakallimeen.
You see there are slafis who call themselves salafis and goes against blind taqlid while their entire point is about rabee al madkhali sheikh salih ap fawzan etc et
Jazakallahu kahiran shaikh, you helped me understand the deen much better than I used to. May Allah bless you and all who are actually trying to unite the ummah. Barakallahu feekum
Masha Allah i completely agree with Sheykh. Why Hanafy mazhab is not raising their hands is because they look to earlier evidences. For example Ali r.a and Abdulloh Ibn Masud r.a used to not raise their hands too. It's not about issues with narration of Hadith but about how Sunnah was followed by Sahabas and Tobeins. Wallohu Alam. The one who doesn't understand Usulul Fikh in their own mazhab they can't dare talk about following Sunnah and Quran in own way. How you want to follow Quran and Sunnah without Usulul Fikh???
The Statement "If the Hadith is Authentic, that is my Madhhab" One of the most misunderstood statements of Imâm al-Shâfi‘î is his famous phrase: “When the authenticity of the hadîth is established, that is my madhhab.” The Ulema of the School explained, contrary to the populist approaches of “Salafîs,” that this principle addresses the jurists who are capable of sifting the abrogating and sound hadîths from the abrogated and unsound ones as well as extract the rulings from their collective evidence according to the principles of the Law and those of the Arabic language. [1] Al-Nawawî said: What Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said does not mean that everyone who sees a sahîh hadîth should say “This is the madhhab of al-Shâfi‘î,” applying the purely external or apparent meaning of his statement. What he said most certainly applies only to such a person as has the rank of ijtihâd in the madhhab. It is a condition for such a person that he be firmly convinced that either Imâm al-Shâfi‘î was unaware of this hadîth or he was unaware of its authenticity. And this is possible only after having researched all the books of al-Shâfi‘î and similar other books of the companions of al-Shâfi‘î, those who took knowledge from him and others similar to them. This is indeed a difficult condition to fulfill. Few are those who measure upto this standard in our times. [2] What we have explained has been made conditional because Imâm al-Shâfi‘î had abandoned acting purely on the external meaning of many hadîths, which he declared and knew. However, he established proofs for criticism of the hadîth or its abrogation or specific circumstances or interpretation and so forth. Shaykh Abu ‘Amr [Ibn al-Salâh] said: “It is no trivial matter to act according to the apparent meaning of what Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said. For it is not permissible for every faqîh - let alone a layman (‘âmmî) - to act independently with what he takes to be a proof from the hadîth. Therefore, whoever among the Shâfi‘îs finds a hadîth that contradicts his School must examine whether he is absolutely accomplished in all the disciplines of ijtihâd, or in that particular topic, or specific question. [If he is,] then he has the right to apply it independently. If he is not, but finds that contravening the hadîth bears too heavily upon him-after having researched it and found no justification for contravening it-then he may apply it if another independent Imâm other than al-Shâfi‘î applies it. This is a good excuse for him to leave the madhhab of his Imâm in such a case.” [3] [1] See, in particular, Shaykh al-Islâm Taqî al-Dîn al-Subkî’s Ma‘nâ Qawl al-Imâm al-Muttalibî Idhâ Sahha al-Hadîthu Fahuwa Madhhabî; Ibn al-Salâh’s Adab al-Muftî wa al-Mustaftî; and the first volume of al-Nawawî’s al-Majm‘. [2] I.e. al-Nawawî’s times, a fortiori ours. Among those who lived in al-Nawawî’s century were al-Fakhr al-Râzî, Ibn al-Salâh, al-Mundhirî, Ibn ‘Abd al-Salâm, al-Qurtubî, Ibn al-Munayyir, Ibn al-Qattân, al- Diyâ’ al-Maqdisî, Ibn Qudâma, and Ibn Daqîq al-‘îd! [3] Al-Nawawî, al-Majm‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab (1:64), citing Ibn al-Salâh’s Fatâwâ wa Masâ’il (1:54, 1:58-59). Cf. al-Tahânawî, I‘lâ’ al-Sunan (2:290-291).
May Allah increase you and bless you and your family abundantly akhi. May Allah accept all of your work for His sake. I truly believe you are sincere and will make 70 excuses for you. Forgive those who slander you, they're either suffering from ignorance or arrogance or many something of the like, they're drinking poison hoping you'll die from it. Stay humble and steadfast, the scholars had a heavy burden and you're carrying it now, it's no light feat. May Allah make it easy for you
Sheykh Ibn Badran رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ said : ''As for Taqlid in Furu, it is allowed for the one who isn't a Mujtahid, according to consensus.'' [Al Madkhal ila Madhab Al - Imam Ahmad]
This is what we need more. Suyukh who have a broad view and focus on uniting the ummah instead of seperating based on some views which some deem as flawed. Across all of the history of islam there have been diffrences of opinions. As long as they do not directly, negatively, affect ones iman, it is ok. It is beautiful to see this invitation to union. As to which imam to follow, I always say, follow the way of the imam which is mostapprochable by you. (To the smart ones that will say follow the porphet (saw) we all know he (saw) is the one we follow). However it is not obligatory for evryone to become expert on the deen. So in order to receive answers and for the sake of answering questions easily. It is best to follow the opinion of the imam which is most approchable for you. As long as it is a righteous imam ofcourse who is following accepted ahlussunnah principles.
Imagine all the fitnah and scrutiny that the likes of Ustad Abu Taymiyayah, Ustad Abduraghman Hassan , Ustad Tim Humble to name but a few must go through on a daily basis. May Allah protect them, Aameen
If we put the mistakes of the scholars of the past and present to one side and look at what they’ve done for Islam, the reality is the scholars of the past like Abu hanafi have done way more for this religion and sacrificed way more. That in itself deserves our respect and love and good words for those imams.
The more I read about fiqh and hadees the respect for all these four imams will even become more and more. What kind of fellows these were in ummah. And now the kids just even can't read Arabic line properly talking about these imams like they have more n better daleel. سبحان اللہ. May Allah bless those imam of ummah. May protect us from this.
Imam Ibn Taymiyya'h RA was a lion of Islam. In today's time, just be a normal, God-fearing Muslim. Be good to your neighbors, get a job, support your parents, family and love your children. That is the most important thing.
Anything that gets you to Janna, do it over and over again till you die, and rely and trust on Allah and fear Allah,like you've never feared and will never fear anything ever.
To add a point to what shaykh has mentioned in the 9th minute.... he explained that a hadith may have reached imam abu hanifah but the narrator was unreliable, hence imam abu hanifa may have rejected it... the reverse is also true... a hadith may be classified daeef by muhadditheen however in the time of imam abu hanifa that same hadith had reached him with an authentic chain, but by the time it reached imam bukhari, muslim, tirmidhi, ahmed, and other muhadditheen, they classified it daeef due to a later narrater who was born after abu hanifas time... note that imam abu haneefa was born in 80hijri and passed away 150hijri while imam bukhari was only born 194 hijri, so the reason for weakness post-dated abu haneefa. Hence many times people may think that a hanafi daleel is weak, whereas it is actually very strong but due to human error and the principals of a later muhaddith, the muhaddith gave a clasification of daeef.
@inakhtive I love Abu Hanifa but do you know hadees book Ibne abi Shayba ...go and see a whole chapter again Abu Hanifa..Abu Hanifa tried to follow Quran and sunnah so we should islam is one not four....but all emam are praise worthy for their deeds and khidmat but followers of them make them as sets.... four madhab all are sahih...is a good joke for their followers because they didn't prayed for four hundred years behind one another in kaba Mecca but now they are United against those who follow the Madhab of all imams i.e. Qur'an and sunnah and understanding of salaf and get benifit from works of all four imams. Alhamdulillah ....Islam is one we are one and imams are on one path their is nothing like four.... Allah knows the best
Assalamu Alaykum bro' you should have finished the verse though: "ask the people of knowledge if you don't know, but if the people of knowledge differ' go back to Allah(Quran) and His Messenger" pbuh(Sunnah/Hadith)
We wouldn't need the 4 schools if that was true ....madhabs are not based just on hadith ...there is more to fiqh then that. This would only be for the people who qualify to understand hadith . Me having a bookshelf fillmore hadith books does not qualify me
About raising the hands, Imam Abu Hanifa has a Hadith from Hammad Ibn Abi Suleiman, from Ibrahim An-Naha’i from Alqamah from Ibn Mas’ud that the Prophet pbuh will raise his hand on the first takbeeratul ihram. Imam Malik said even though the Hadith of Ibn Umar was authentic, the people of Madina weren’t doing it. So the Malikis don’t do it.
This is a reply to the points raised about Imam Abu Hanifah 1- I am a Salafi since 27 years and I travellied in the early days to learn Arabic and study with the Salafi Scholars. 2- Was Imam Ahmed from the 3rd or 4th Generation? 4th if you check by agreement, and to prove that you see in his Musnad the shortest chains of Hadeeth have 3 men between him and the Prophet SAW 3- Was Imam Abu Hanifah from the 2nd or 3rd or 4th generation? Minimum for the 3rd Generation and possibly the 2nd as it's said he met some Sahaaba RA 4- Thousands of Sahaaba settled in Kufah where Imam Abu Hanifah learnt. Thousands also stayed in Madinah where Imam Maalik learnt. 5- Imam Abu Hanifah was a Muhadith and learnt from the hadeeth scholars in Kufah who had collected Hadeeth already. 6- Imam Abu Hanifah had in his circle 30 scholars to discuss back and forth issues before deciding on an issue and from those were scholars of Hadeeth. 7- If a chain of Hadeeth had 2 or maybe 3 men in the chain and and another had 4 or 5 usually, which is more likely to have slip ups and mistakes? Which is more difficult to make sure about? So Abu Hanifah and Imam Maalik had less chance of error in Hadeeth than Imam Ahmed. 8- If a hadeeth in the time of Abu Hanifah was Saheeh then its possible the same hadeeth become Weak later as one of the extra 2 or 3 men in the chain could make mistakes. 9- Imam Abu Hanifah made Jarh wa Ta'deel.critiquing and praising the men in chains and its well recorded To be continued ....
Just watched the whole of this video -we need more Scholars like you who are advising the Ummah with such care + concern. I would suggest you carry on your good work, dont even bother responding/watching etc to your critics - shaitan wants to distract you from the need of the Ummah. May Allah guide and protect you.
@@Joebammy he describes himself as a student of knowledge , But mashaa allah tbh the adaab and humility he has is like that of a real scholar. Ilm is more than studying at Madinah University or learning books my dear friend.
Subhaan-Allah ! Wise response regarding those who say they only follow Qur'aan and Sunnah - as if these four Madhaahib were based on the Torah and Injeel...
The last part of my answer 18- Usually when a scholar later on wrote a book in Fiqh he might have used a very weak hadeeth, along came scholars later and checked those hadeeth and declared the opinion as weak becuase the hadeeth is very weak, BUT that hadeeth alot of times was never used for the original proof, somethings else was used, either a another Hadeeth or verse or Sahaaba and so on. Look how we messed up! 19- You can't understand a Saheeh Hadeeth sometimes alone, it has other narrations mentioning the background to the hadeeth and then you got the Sahaaba and the angles from the Arabic Language which needs Usoolul Fiqh to undefrstand why and how its a proof and why the other saheeh Hadeeth is not used for this issue and so on. 20- You can not use the Usoolul Fiqh of one Madhab for the Fiqh of another madhab Text as each Madhab had its slightly different angles to approach issues and their approaches go back to the Tabi'aan and Sahaabah, not made up. Many salafis still don't understand this and caused hell breaking up families and masjids and villages all over where they went thinking theyre the saved sect like the Jehavoahs Witnesses. Plus theres 5 main different groups of Salafis, 3 of them fight and warn from each other very harshly and one of them keep splitting up every few years more and more past 30 years. The Day of Judgment its every man for themselves and only the Shafaa'a of the Prophet SAW will give you a chance After the Mercy of Allah. 21- Imam Ahmed and Shaafi'ee both built upon the Fiqh of those who came before them and Imam Shaafi'ee mastered the 4 madhabs of his time by learning with them or their students then critiqued their usool and furoo, Abu Hanifahs, Imam Maaliks, Imam al-Awzaa'iee and Imam Laith ibn Sad. Imam Maaliks madhab today is built upon the Mudawaanah which was built upon Imam Asad bin Furaat who studied with Imam Malik then Imam Muhammed Hasan ash-Shaibaani, student of Imam Abu Hanifah and this is where Imam Asd bin Furaat asked thousdand of questions in extra classes with Imam Muhammed, these thousands of questions got asked to Imam Maaliks students by him later as when he retuned to Imam Maalik he had passed away RH, and thus we can say Imam Abu Hanifah Formed the Foundation of the Fiqh of all 4 Madhabs. This is ONE REASON WHY THEY ATTACK HIM, if they put doubts into the Madhab of Abu Hanifah then all Fiqh collapses!!! And another reason is becasue he destroyed many deviants sects in debates and lastly because he was very pious and would sleep only the first third of the night in winter then pray till Fajr and between Zuhr and Asr in the Summer as the nights were short so he prayed again from Isha till Fajr, as his wife mentioned. The rest of his time from Fajr till Ishaa was teaching in his Masjid which is still there today! RH. He knew how to debate way before was a Rich Entrepreneaur so would clothe his studnets in the best clothes and look after them and he would send money to the schlolars and their students in Badhdad and Basrah whilst he was in Kufah, and studied Fiqh for 20 years from 20 years old till 40 with Imam Hammad ibn Abi Sulayman who learn from learnt from Ibraheem an-Nakha'i. Recently a MA reserch in Jordan showed how in 600 of Abdullah ibn Mas'oods fatwaas, 590 were in line with Abu Hanifahs Fatwas as he inherited his Fiqh. He made Hajj 40 times and met many scholars in Makkah and Madinah everytime and discussed and debated with them and thats why he got well known. 22- Imam ibn Abi Shaibah mentioned in the end of his big book al-Musannaf some 140 issues where he claimed Imam Abu Hanifah went against Hadeeth, this has been rebutted in 3 books, summary being Imam ibn Abi Shaibah was not a specialist in Fiqh like Abu Hanifah by a long way, hois speciality was Hadeeth mainly and these Hadeeth were understood by Imam Abu Hanifah in a different way or he prefered other hadeeth above them or he saw hidden defects/ILAL in those hadeeth which is a high level science as a Muhadith. I hope this helps you my brother and others. It was a revision for me. Past 18 montyhs I have had re-learn a lot and discover tons of misinfortantion in many areas, so we've made a big massive mess and we need to clarify! I wrote this from my head quick as possible and hope it saves a lot of hassle and benefits all of us.
@@ishaqthkrwhat did Allah or Nabi said about aeroplane prayer then. What fool are you. Somethin not invented then, is now being answered using the context about previous fatawa. Alhamdulilah fiqah hanafi has answers about aeroplane prayer : )
One huge issue-to the questioner -who are you to agree or disagree with a opinion within any of the madhahib? That’s the real question. Where’s your qualification? Where did you study to assume you know better? Personally i liked explaining the 4 madhahib as 3/4 different logics to deriving proof. Each of them are correct, they just use different usool (principles) to come to their respective conclusion. And truly the real secret sauce to madhahib is that they’re the only 4 last unbroken chains of transmission that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ.
@@Isaagain the saheeh Hadith first usool was moreso a hanbali/shafi madhhab usool. Imam Malik And Imam Abu Hanifa RA were tabaee’s. For example; When imam Malik was deriving his usool fiqh he was the mufti of Madina at a time where sahaba were still alive, not like nowadays where people go on TH-cam and pickup some Hadith book and act like they figured it out already. Our deen isn’t so cheap brother, people dedicated their lives to preserving it. Every step of the way was highly documented and recorded. Its not so simplistic as you make it seem. Within the madhahib system there’s a continuous chain of scholarship from teacher to student that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ. Which means within each madhhab TENS OF THOUSANDS (if not hundreds of thousands if not millions) of ulema came And added and or preserved and or amended what needed to be its not like each madhhab follows one scholar (like how the salafis follow About 3 scholars -all of which were alive within the past 100ish years but some how think they figured it out better than the millions of other ulema who dedicated their lives to this deen from the time of the sahaba to now).
Wow such a nice and humble brother abu timiya is❤❤. We need Muslim brothers like him. I following hanafi deobandi school but i love my other Muslim brothers also like salafi.
Brother, don’t be sad. Think about all of those Imams went through many hardships including jail and beating in this way. May الله عزوجل keep you firm and strong in saying the truth
Sad to say, Some our Islamic Scholar are attacking each other especially the so called salafi scholar. May Allah unite the Muslims all around the world.
The truth is more deserving to be protected than men. So if someone opposed the truth, which is the quran and sunnah and way of the sahabah, that someone should be refuted.
The problem with encouraging people to follow a madhab is in this day the scholars of their madhab will also be the ones teaching them aqida. Can you be sure hanafi scholars will teach the correct aqida to their students? Direct people to the scholars with the correct aqida firstly.
It is the Dunning-Kruger effect. The ones who know the least are the loudest in their opinion. They read 10 hadith, watched 24 videos and know they think they can criticise the greatest scholars of islam based on that; people, who dedicated their entire lives on studying and understanding islam. That is pure arrogance and ignorance.
I find it strange that you have to use the quotes of modern day scholars to prove your argument. They aren’t evidence, but due to the blindness of these people if you don’t prove to them that their scholars held the opinion that just blast you with not being on the menhaj.
Exactly. They’re also “blind followes” partisan to their own specific modern scholars. But it’s so wrong to follow the scholars from amongst the salaf when you’re “salafi” ironically
There;s no shame in saying that I am only following QURAN and SUnnah my brother , the question is not about whether these 4 mazhabs are from Bible Or Turat you mentioned that at 5:55 , but the real thing is that did our Prophet specified these 4 mahabs the answer is No , which is why one has the total right to say I am a Muslim before after and in the middle , period. This is the thing our so called Islamic scholars doesn't understand with having numerous years of reading and teaching from Islam, Inadeena GHINDALLAHEL ISLAM.
The sad thing is Imam Abu Hanifa was from the Salaf and the so-called Salafis follow four scholars our time (Khalaf): Ibn Baz, Al-albani, Fawzan and Uthaymin.
#Article: Did Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله follow Rai or Sunnah? Imām Abu Hanīfah said “Beware of speaking about matters of Deen based on Raï (personal opinions) and hold firm to the Sunnah for the one who leaves the Sunnah goes astray” (i) Raï means juristic opinions. Al-Tūfī said, "There are two types of raï: (1) One which is based purely on one's intellect (2) One which involves using the intellect to extract rulings from Quran and Ahādith. And this is what is meant when it is said, “this is the Raï of Imām Abu Hanīfah or this is the Raï of Imām As-Shafei.”(ii) _In essence, Raï signifies Fiqh. Therefore, when it is asserted that Imam Abu Hanifah and his disciples were "Ashāb Al Raï", it does not imply that they disregarded Hadith and relied solely on personal opinions; rather, it signifies their proficiency in jurisprudence. Moreover, being adept in fiqh does not preclude one from also being well-versed in Hadīth. This is because there is no inherent conflict between fiqh and Hadīth, as Hadīth constitutes the recorded teachings of Rasūlullah صلى الله عليه وسلم, while fiqh represents the methodology for interpreting them._ Imām Khattābi said, “Hadīth is like a foundation and Fiqh is like it's edifice. Every edifice devoid of a foundation will collapse and every foundation without an edifice is uninhabited and dilapidated.” (iii) Imām Tirmidhī narrated the Hadīth of Umm ‘Atiyya about the ritual bath of Zaynab رضي الله عنها and explained it by quoting the rulings of the Fuqaha (Experts in Fiqh) and then commented, *“And this is what has been mentioned by the Fuqaha and they are more knowledgeable regarding meaning of the Hadith”* (Tirmidhi no 990) Imām Mālik said, “We only take Ahādith from the Fuqaha"(iv) Ibn Wahb said, “Every Muhaddith who does not follow an Imām in Fiqh is misguided. If I had not studied under Imām Mālik and Abu Layth, I would have been astray too” (v) Al-Khatīb Al-Baghdādi, said “Know that one does not become a Faqīh merely by narrating abundance of Ahādith. One only becomes a Faqīh by extracting the meanings of a Hadith and by pondering over it” (vi) Ibn ‘Abdil Barr says, *“No Imām rejected a Hadīth except that the Hadīth was abrogated according to him, or that there was a defect in the chain of transmission*[...] People have criticized Abu Hanīfah and have labelled him as a Murji’ite[...] People were jealous of him and have levelled various accusations against him and have fabricated stories about him which are unbefitting" (vii) Ibn Taymiyyah says “He who thinks that Abu Hanīfah or other Aimmah have preferred Qiyās over Sahih Ahādith has erred and has spoken out of speculation and desires” (viii) Ibn Qayyim says “Abu Hanīfah preferred weak Ahādith over Qiyās. For e.g, logic demands that laughing in Salāh does not break Wudhu, but there is a weak Hadīth that suggests that laughing in Salāh break both Wudhu and Salāh and Abu Hanīfah adopted that view. So, if he was following Raï, he would have discarded the Hadīth and followed logic instead” (ix) In fact, Imam Abū Hanīfah abhorred using intellect only to derive rulings so much that he said “To urinate in the Musjid is better than some of the Qiyās that people do” (x) May Allah safeguard the reputation of Imām Abū Hanīfah and dispel any misunderstandings about him. Āmīn. Yāsin Ibn Yūsuf Shawwāl 1445 Mauritius ----------------------------------------------- (i) Mīzān Al Kubra, ‘Abdul Wahhāb Al-Sha’rāni (973AH), Maymaniyya, Cairo (ii) Sharh Mukhtasar Al-Rawdah, Vol3 Pg 288, Al Tūfi (716AH), Risālah, Beirut (iii) M’ālim As-Sunan, vol1 Pg 3 , Al Khattābi (388AH), Ilmiyya, Aleppo (iv) Tartīb Al-Madārik wa Taqrīb Al Masālik, Ibn ‘Abdil Barr (544AH), Fadhāla, Morocco (v) Al Jāmi’ Fi Sunan Wal Adāb Wal Maghāzi Wat-Tārīkh, pg 119, Ibn Abi Zayd Al Qayrawāni (386AH), Risālah, Beirut (vi) Al Faqīh Wal Mutaffaqīh, Vol2 Pg 159, Khatīb Baghdādi (463AH), Dar Ibn Jawzi, Saudi Arabia (vii) Majmū' Al Fatāwa, Vol 20 Pg 304, Ibn Taymiyyah, Fahd (viii)Jāmi’ Bayān Al ‘ilm, Ibn ‘Abdil Barr (463AH), Dar Ibn Jawzi, Saudi Arabia (ix) ‘Ilām Al Muwaqqi'īn, Vol 1 Pg 26, Ibn Qayyim, Ilmiyya (x) Siyar ‘Alām Nubala, Vol 6 Pg 401, Al-Dhahabi (748AH), Risālah, Beirut
People need to understand that without an Aqeedah u can not be muslim! Some people just choose a madhab for themselves and think thats it, madhab is just for fiqh. Aqeedah is main part of islam, without aqeedah u Cant even start salah.! Also, Hanafi is a madhab, and salafi is an aqeedah, So u can be both at the same time.!
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN . TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
@@taimurahmad ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN . TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
This is unity. I love this guy for the sake of allah. I follow the hanafi madhab but I'm a layman so it's just easier to follow a madhab. We are all of ahlus sunnah so we still can take from other madhabs
ANYBODY who follows one of the four imams school of thought will walk the path to jannah ان شاء الله. And anyone (layman, contemporary scholars) who criticizes them should understand that compared to them you’re a grain of sand in the desert and should keep completely silent.
Imaam Fudayl bin Iyaad (rahimahullah) said ; Indeed the hearts of these People have drank the syrup of (excessive) love for (Imaam) Abu Haneefah and have exaggerated about him so much so that they do not see anyone more knowledgeable than him, just as the Shee'ah exaggerated in the love of (Sayyidunah) Ali (radiallah anhu), whereas indeed By Allaah, Imam Sufyaan ath-Thawri was more knowledgeable than him (i.e. Imaam Abu Haneefah) [Hilyat ul-Awliyaa (6/358), Chain Saheeh, via ibn abi raza]
@jamielsaddiq9692 abu haneefah is declared weak in hadeeth by muhadditheen like alBukhari, Muslim and An Nisa'ee. The post above has to do with people who have blind following and fanatacism towards abi haneefah
The most stupid thing I ever hear is that when people say whether the 4 madhabs based on Torah or Injeel Brother, THERE IS NO TAQLEED IN ISLAM The issue goes back to Taqlid ! Those people say you should blind follow an imam Many hanafis dont do rafa yadain just because they blind follow Imam Abu Hanifa rah Which is not correct ?
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 Please give me evidence from the entire ashari and maturidi school why this is the case. Not one or two who claim they are from these schools
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 So the vast majority of this Ummah, both scholars and laymen, from the time of the Prophet ﷺ to now, are Kuffar? This is what the Khawarij say
There is nothing like salafi, nor hanafi, Its all second names of ahlu sunnah wa al jam'ah, salafi = who believes the khulfa ar rashdeen, and tab'een and taba' tabeen (first and second and third generation scholars), Imam abu hanifa himself was a salafi, he believed and preached what people before him preached, you are becoming fitnah to this ummah, may allah guide you and me.
Hanbali Maliki Shafii Hanafi all of the four masalik are on haq as they have there rulings are based on Sunnah of Prophet and companions. There are differences due to the methods they used to deduce rulings of shariah which doesn't make them a deviant unlike Shias who rejects the following of Sunnah but follow certain scholars and base their shariah on selective opinions of present scholars being openly biased against companions of Prophet.
The main problem of Salafi is that they don't believe in following "only" One way of deduction but on purely "text analysis" open for interpretation that may lead to wrong understanding causing fitnah. May Allah guide us all on the right path.
Abu Hanifah student Abu Yusuf said he died as a jahmi 183 - Mahmud ibn Ghaylān narrated to me and said: Muhammad ibn Sa’īd ibn Salm narrated to us, from his father who said: I asked Abū Yūsuf while he was in Gorgan about Abū Hanīfah, so he said: “What do you want with him, he died as a jahmī.” Kitaab Sunnah by Abdullah ibn ahmad
These reports most like to be weak or based on jealousy. Allah knows the best. We have reports of Imam Abu Hanifa himself refuted Jahmis أبا يوسف يقول قال أبو حنيفة صنفان من شر الناس بخراسان الجهمية والمشبهة وربما قال والمقاتلية Abu Yusaf said Abu Hanifa said: There are two types of evil people in Khurasaan (1) Jahmiyah and (2) Mushabbiha.. [Source: Tareekh Baghdad 13/382 Authenticated by Amr Abdul Munim Saleem. The saying of Abu Yusaf that Abu Hanifa died whith the belief that Quran is Makhlooq [Tareekh Baghdad 13/379] is not proven Shaykh Nasir ud din alBani rahimaullah did kalam on this. He said وأما ما روى الخطيب (13/379) من طريق سعيد بن مسلم الباهلي قال: قلنا لأبي يوسف: لما لم تحدثنا عن أبي حنيفة؟ قال: ما تصنعون به؟ مات يوم مات يقول: القرآن مخلوق. قلت: ففي ثبوته عن أبي يوسف نظر؛ لأن الباهلي هذا، لا يعرف بالرواية، ولذلك أغفلوه، ولم يترجموه في كتب الرجال، حتى ابن أبي حاتم لم يذكره في “كتابه” مع سعته وأحاطته، ولعل السبب في ذلك ما أشار إليه الخطيب في آخر ترجمته (9/74): “بصري الأصل، وكان قد سكن خراسان، وولاه السلطان بعض الأعمال بمرو، وقدم بغداد وحدث بها، فروى عن محمد بن زياد بن الأعرابي، صاحب اللغة. وكان عالماً بالحديث والعربية، إلا أنه كان لا يبذل نفسه للناس”. لكن هنا في “التاريخ” روايات أخرى عدة أن أبا حنيفة كان يقول: “القرآن مخلوق”، إلا أنني دققت النظر في بعضها فوجدته لا يخلو من قادح، ولعل سائرها كذلك، لاسيما وقد روى الخطيب عن الإمام أحمد أنه قال: لم يصح عندنا أن أبا حنيفة كان يقول: “القرآن مخلوق”. قلت: وهذا هو الظن بالإمام أبي حنيفة - رحمه الله - وعلمه، فإن صح عنه خلافه، فلعل ذلك كان قبل أن يناظره أبو يوسف، كما في الرواية الثابتة عنه في الكتاب، فلما ناظره، ولأمر ما استمر في مناظرته ستة أشهر، اتفق معه أخيراً على أن القرآن غير مخلوق، وأن من قال: “القرآن مخلوق” فهو كافر. وهذا في الواقع من الأدلة الكثيرة على فضل أبي حنيفة، فإنه لم تأخذه العزة، ولم يستكبر عن متابعة تلميذه أبي يوسف حين تبين له أن الحق معه، فرحمه الله تعالى ورضي عنه [Mukhtasar al Uluw page 156]
Even after providing all the evidences and statements of kibar Ulamah, we have pseudo salafis in the comments slandering the Imam thinking they are some sort of Shaykh Al Islam because they came across a few statements in the books of the salaf without context or understanding. May الله سبحانه وتعالى guide these sick individuals.
Following madhab is not proven from the Quran and Sunnah. Allah orderes us to follow Quran and Sunnah and not any individual especially if he is not a hujjah.
Are Aalim, Mufassir, Muhaddith, and Mujtahid yourself?! When you are following a scholar of the current times you are also a Muqallid. The only difference is that Imam Abu Hanifa was a scholar of the Salaf and Hanafis follow him whereas you follow a contemporary scholar of the Khalaf. Every Muslim who is not a Mujtahid is by definition a Muqalid.
If they all took out from the Quran and the sunnah, then why do they called madhab's name instead of saying muslim . Did Allah and rasool say to follow one madhab? Or to called us hanafi, safi etc because of following the Quran and sunnah?
My question is how can anyone in their right mind say anything negative about the 4 Imams? These Imams are so high in their level of knowledge that we can't even get an inche close to them let alone pass them. These are the people who finished 1 Quran every night, prayed tahajaat, prayed all 5 of their salah on time, be teachers, parents mentors, husband's, and more at the same time. Yet we have the oddacity to say negative statements about them when we don't even read the Quran on daily basis, not to mention understanding it. Be careful what comes out of your tongue, you just maybe saying something wrong or false about those who were close to the Creator of all things
Prophet asked the sahabas if they can finish a third of quran a night and they said they can't, Prophet told them Suratul Ikhlas is equal to ⅓ of the whole quran. But you want us to believe Imam Abu Hanifa finished the whole quran in one night LMAO
@@ashkirali4105 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) said to his companions, "Is it difficult for any of you to recite one third of the Qur'an in one night?" This suggestion was difficult for them so they said, "Who among us has the power to do so, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" Allah Apostle replied: " Allah (the) One, the Self-Sufficient Master Whom all creatures need.' (Surat Al-Ikhlas 112.1--to the End) is equal to one third of the Qur'an." [ Sahih al-Bukhari: 5015]
I really want to ask this questions and I need an answer for the sake of Allah. I love both Ustath Abdourahman Al Hassan and Abu Taymiyah bcux they really inspire me, but I miss seeing their videos together🥹 May Allah protect them from the faitna of the hypocrites
Al-Khateeb may Allaah have mercy on him said in 'At-Taarikh' (Vol.3 page 37): And he mentioned an authentic chain to Ahmed bin 'Ali Al-Battaar: Ahmed bin 'Ali Al-Battaar: He mentioned those people who refuted Abu Hanifah: Ayyub As-Sakhtiyaani and Jareer bin Haazim, and Hammaam bin Yahyaa, and Hammaad bin Salamah, and Hammaad bin Zayd, and Abu' Awwaanah, and Abdul-Waarith, and Suwaar Al-'Anbari Al-Qaadhi, and Yazeed bin Zurai', and 'Ali bin' Aasim, and Maalik bin Anas, and Ja'far bin Muhammad, and 'Umar bin Qays, and Abu' Abdir-Rahmaan Al-Muqri', and Sa'eed bin Adbil-Aziz, and Awzaa'ee, and Abdullaah bin Al-Mubaarak, and Abu Ishaaq Al-Fazaaree, and Yusuf bin Asbaat, and Muhammad bin Jaabir, and Sufyaan At-Thawri, and Sufyaan bin 'Uyaiynah, and Hammaad bin Abi Sulaymaan, and Ibn Abi Laylaa, and Hafs bin Ghayyaath, and Abu Bakr bin 'Ayyaash, and Shareek bin' Abdillaah, and Wakee' bin Al-Jarraah, and Ruqbah bin Misqalah, and Fadhl bin Musaa, and 'Eesaa bin Yunus, and Al-Hajjaaj bin Artaa', and Maalik bin Mighwal, and Al-Qaasim bin Habeeb, and Ibn Shabrumah.
10:32 Ibn Al-Mubarak asked Abu Hanifa about the lifting of the hands at the ruku'. Then Abu Hanifa said: will he raise his hands to fly? Ibn Al-Mubarak was a sensible man, so he said: if he flew during the first time (when he raised his hands) he flies the second time too. Then Abu Hanifa was quiet and did not say anything.” (Tarikh Baghdad 13/389) Please don’t tell us the Hadith didn’t reach Abu hanifa when it did. Abu hanifa was known to reject ahadith of the messenger as reported from Al-Awzaaie: “We don't mind that Abu Hanifa spoke with opinion but we mind that the hadeeth of the prophet, salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam, came to him and he would give fatwa with something else.” (Dhamm Al-Kalam of Al-Harawi 3/2-3)
And Ibn Taymiyyah رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ gave reasons for why Hadeeth May be rejected in regards to a person giving another fatwa He was a man of fiqh and he used Qiyas in cases where he saw applicable رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ Your words mean nothing
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali the statements of the salaf take precedence over the khalaf. I dare you to say imam bukahri and all the other a’aimma from the salt were wrong when it came to the criticism of Abu hanifa not only when it came to Hadith but the likes of his mistakes when it comes to irja and khurooj
According to a video featuring Sheikh Suleyman Ruheyli, it was suggested to Sheikh Bin Baz by Sh Saleh Ala Shaykh that the section in the book "As-Sunnah" by Abdullah ibn Ahmed, containing narrations from the Salaf that speak negatively about Imam Abu Hanifa, should be removed. Sheikh Bin Baz reportedly approved of this suggestion.
th-cam.com/video/Arcxk-8rA5A/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EAz3edQsvBJ76zYb
P.S There is no contradiction in the video of following the way of the salaf providing you don’t make it sectarian and that’s what every Muslim should be doing while at the same time you follow a madhab when it comes to Fiqhi related matters.
Also I acknowledge that some of the salaf said some very negative things about Abu Hanifah, however the scholars have *unanimously agreed* on his imamship and him being a magnificent scholar later on down the line as stated by ibn Taymiyyah and other than him.
Why do I keep quoting ibn Taymiyyah?
As mentioned in the 5 hour podcast, Imam At Thahabi said about him: “ He (ibn Taymiyyah) has in depth understanding when knowing the positions of the companions & the tabieen.” And also because he is a household name that is widely accepted by those who ascribe to salafism.
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
*❝Whoever assumes that Abū Ḥanīfah or any other Imām of the Muslims intentionally contradicts authentic aḥādīth based on qiyās (analogical reasoning) or other reasons, then he has erred in his judgement and speaks either based on conjecture or personal desires. This is Abū Ḥanīfah, who acts upon the ḥadīth of using nabīdh for medicinal purposes during travel, contrary to qiyās, and the ḥadīth of laughter during prayer, despite contradicting qiyās. He believes in their authenticity, even though the scholars of ḥadīth did not authenticate them. We have clarified this in the treatise “Raf’ al-Malam ‘An al-A’immat al-A’lām” and demonstrated that none of the Imāms of Islām contradict an authentic ḥadīth without justification. They have numerous excuses, such as not having been informed of the ḥadīth or receiving it from a source they do not trust or whose implications they do not consider conclusive evidence. They may also believe that the evidence presented is outweighed by stronger evidence, such as abrogation (nāsikh) or indications of abrogation and similar factors.❞*
ومَن ظَنَّ بِأبِي حَنِيفَةَ أوْ غَيْرِهِ مِن أئِمَّةِ المُسْلِمِينَ أنَّهُمْ يَتَعَمَّدُونَ مُخالَفَةَ الحَدِيثِ الصَّحِيحِ لِقِياسِ أوْ غَيْرِهِ فَقَدْ أخْطَأ عَلَيْهِمْ وتَكَلَّمَ إمّا بِظَنِّ وإمّا بِهَوى فَهَذا أبُو حَنِيفَةَ يَعْمَلُ بِحَدِيثِ التوضي بِالنَّبِيذِ فِي السَّفَرِ مُخالَفَةً لِلْقِياسِ وبِحَدِيثِ القَهْقَهَةِ فِي الصَّلاةِ مَعَ مُخالَفَتِهِ لِلْقِياسِ؛ لِاعْتِقادِهِ صِحَّتَهُما وإنْ كانَ أئِمَّةُ الحَدِيثِ لَمْ يُصَحِّحُوهُما. وقَدْ بَيَّنّا هَذا فِي رِسالَةِ «رَفْعِ المَلامِ عَنْ الأئِمَّةِ الأعْلامِ» وبَيَّنّا أنَّ أحَدًا مِن أئِمَّةِ الإسْلامِ لا يُخالِفُ حَدِيثًا صَحِيحًا بِغَيْرِ عُذْرٍ بَلْ لَهُمْ نَحْوٌ مِن عِشْرِينَ عُذْرًا مِثْلَ أنْ يَكُونَ أحَدُهُمْ لَمْ يَبْلُغْهُ الحَدِيثُ؛ أوْ بَلَغَهُ مِن وجْهٍ لَمْ يَثِقْ بِهِ أوْ لَمْ يَعْتَقِدْ دَلالَتَهُ عَلى الحُكْمِ؛ أوْ اعْتَقَدَ أنَّ ذَلِكَ الدَّلِيلَ قَدْ عارَضَهُ ما هُوَ أقْوى مِنهُ كالنّاسِخِ؛ أوْ ما يَدُلُّ عَلى النّاسِخِ وأمْثالُ ذَلِكَ.
📚 (Majmū’ al-Fatāwā 20/304-305)
• Ibn al-Qayyim said:
*❝Abū Yūsuf had sought Bishr al-Marīsī’s repentance when he denied that Allāh is above His Throne. This incident is well-known, mentioned by ‘Abd al-Raḥman Ibn Abī Ḥātim and others. The early followers of Abū Ḥanīfah have unanimously agreed upon this.*
وَقَدِ اسْتَتَابَ أَبُو يُوسُفَ بِشْرًا الْمَرِيسِيَّ لَمَّا أَنْكَرَ أَنَّ اللَّهَ فَوْقَ عَرْشِهِ وَهِيَ قِصَّةٌ مَشْهُورَةٌ ذَكَرَهَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ وَغَيْرُهُ، وَأَصْحَابُ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ الْمُتَقَدِّمُونَ عَلَى هَذَا.
*Muḥammad Ibn al-Ḥasan stated: “All of the jurists from the East to the West are unanimously agreed in having faith in the Qur'ān and the aḥādīth which came through the trustworthy narrators from the Prophet ﷺ on the description of the Lord without changing them, describing them nor likening them to creation. So whoever explained anything from them today, then he has departed from that which the Prophet ﷺ was upon and he has separated from Jamā’ah, for they did not describe and explain, however they gave verdicts upon what is in the Book and the Sunnah then they remained silent. So whoever spoke with the saying of Jahm, then he has separated from the Jamā’ah because he described Allāh with the description of a non-existent entity.”*
قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ اتَّفَقَ الْفُقَهَاءُ كُلُّهُمْ مِنَ الْمَشْرِقِ إِلَى الْمَغْرِبِ عَلَى الْإِيمَانِ بِالْقُرْآنِ وَالْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ بِهَا الثِّقَاتُ عَنِ الرَّسُولِ فِي صِفَاتِ الرَّبِّ مِنْ غَيْرِ تَفْسِيرٍ وَلَا وَصْفٍ وَلَا تَشْبِيهٍ، فَمَنْ فَسَّرَ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَقَدْ خَرَجَ عَمَّا كَانَ عَلَيْهِ النَّبِيُّ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَإِنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَصِفُوا وَلَمْ يُفَسِّرُوا وَلَكِنْ آمَنُوا بِمَا فِي الْكُتُبِ وَالسُّنَّةِ ثُمَّ سَكَتُوا، فَمَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ؛ لِأَنَّهُ وَصَفَهُ بِصِفَةٍ لَا شَيْءَ.
*Muḥammad - may Allāh have mercy upon him - also said: “Likewise the aḥādīth that mention Allāh descending to the lowest heaven and similar notions. These aḥādīth were narrated by trustworthy sources, and we transmit and believe in them without interpreting them.”*
وَقَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى أَيْضًا فِي الْأَحَادِيثِ الَّتِي جَاءَتْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى يَهْبِطُ إِلَى سَمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا وَنَحْوِ هَذَا، هَذِهِ الْأَحَادِيثُ قَدْ رَوَاهَا الثِّقَاتُ فَنَحْنُ نَرْوِيهَا وَنُؤْمِنُ بِهَا وَلَا نُفَسِّرُهَا، ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ
*Abū al-Qāsim al-Lālakā’ī mentioned this, and this is proven from him that anyone who adheres to the views of Jahm has indeed separated from the Muslim community.*
ذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ (عَنْهُ) أَبُو الْقَاسِمِ اللَّالَكَائِيُّ، وَهَذَا تَصْرِيحٌ مِنْهُ بِأَنَّ مَنْ قَالَ بِقَوْلِ جَهْمٍ فَقَدْ فَارَقَ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ
*Al-Ṭaḥāwī mentioned in the ‘aqīdah of Abū Ḥanīfah and his companions, may Allāh exalt their mention, that which aligns with this [belief]. They are the most innocent of people from ta’ṭīl and tajahhum. In his well-known creed, al-Ṭaḥāwī stated: “And He, the Exalted, encompasses everything and is above it, and his creation is incapable of encompassing Him.”❞*
وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ الطَّحَاوِيُّ فِي اعْتِقَادِ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَصَاحِبَيْهِ رَحِمَهُمُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى مَا يُوَافِقُ هَذَا، وَأَنَّهُمْ أَبْرَأُ النَّاسِ مِنَ التَّعْطِيلِ وَالتَّجَهُّمِ، فَقَالَ فِي عَقِيدَتِهِ الْمَعْرُوفَةِ: وَأَنَّهُ تَعَالَى مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ، وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلَقَهُ.
📚 (Ijtimā’ al-Juyūsh al-Islāmīyyah p. 335-337)
ok we will leave the اثار of the salaf and follow Sheikh Suleyman Ruheyli
قال الامام البخاري رحمه الله في " التاريخ الكبير " (8/81) قال فيه : " سكتوا عنه ، وعن رأيه ، وعن حديثه "
Imam Abu Hanifa was one the biggest scholar of the Salaf, it is believed that he was also a Tabi'ee, giving him even more prestige.
A Jahil like you is not in a position to question such a great Imam. @@randomhero6156
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
How are you brother
WHICH IMAM MUST WE FOLLOW ❓
Followers of imams ( Madhabs) have decided all the four imams ( Madhabs) are correct, but we must ONLY follow ONE 🤦♂
The complete & perfected Islam existed before the arrival of the four great Imams.
Allah did NOT instruct us to follow any imam.
The Prophet P.B.U.H did NOT instruct us to follow any imam.
The imams did NOT instruct us to follow them.
All the four great imams said, if you find a hadith which contradicts what we have taught you then REJECT what we taught you ( This proves the target of all the four imams was to direct us to the Quran & Hadith )
A question for all those people who a follow an imam, are you ready to REJECT a Hadith to follow an imam 🤦🏻♂❓
Just met sheikh Abu Taymiyyah in Medina. What a humble, loving approachable Sheikh ❤. May Allah preserve you Sheikh you are changing lives for the better!
ustaadh n sheikh is different my akh
@@Yass-if6znI also saw him in Medina last week. I doubt he will be there much longer, but to be honest with you, me and the brother I was with just saw him and acknowledged the fact that it was him and walked past as we made our way to the safs for Fajr.
Focus on your stay in the blessed lands, and do not spend energy thinking about who will be there etc.
@Yass-if6zn they are leaving now
Ummah with the mandam 8 was the group he goes with. Dawah man too
@@joefrazier9282 May he be raised to the status of sheikh soon InshaAllah. Sheikh or not i respect him.
He’s a celebrity “sheikh” loves the clout
JazakAllahu khyr sheikh to finally clarify this. I follow a hanafi Madhab, and it hurts me a lot when a common man criticises Imam Abu Hanifa.
Though it's the best to leave out where the madhihad made mistakes
@@pearlsofjannah6438 if u have enough knowledge to detect those mistakes
@@pearlsofjannah6438give me some of the mistakes.
Imam Abdallah Ibn Mubarak is reported to have said “Any one who criticizes Imam Abu Hanifa is either jealous of the imam or he is an ignoramus
@@alhassangangu4357saying a Hadith is weak is not criticism 😢
Beautiful answers, I’m sick and tired of people disrespecting the imam they don’t follow. It’s disgraceful! All four were absolute mountains of knowledge and we respect the rulings and methodology by all!
Beautiful statements brought by our beloved Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah. I had the opportunity of meeting him in person in Medina during my Umrah. All I can say is that he's very humble and respectable and tall. He has a very pleasing personality and down to earth. May Allah preserve Shaykh Abu Taymiyyah.
Masha'Allah.
Ameen
shaiyk you have helped me so much on my journey. I don’t understand the hate, you genuinely feel like my personal shaiyk. May Allah preserve you and bless you
He's not a sheikh he's a public speaker. He doesn't deserve hate but it's probably because he's from a different madhab
Absolutely Liked your Wide Angle View ! Subhanallah
May Allah Increase you in Akhirah and Knowledge
May Allah reward you sheikh Ibu Taymiyyah, may Allah honour you for your continued defense of the Sunnah and the people of the Sunnah.
Ameen
Ameen
Ameen
@@idk-ms8fe sheikh Ibu Taymiyyah, maybe his follow scholar ibn taymiah.... there are red flags attached to him, foloow sunii or sufi but do not follow salafi, they dint make mawlid, font go to the graves to pray for the one who left this world or get blessing, dont do tawassuf
@@flag_bearertruth6257 yes bro ur right
I'm happy that there are still people like this shaykh who have understanding of Deen and are not confusing people by telling them to leave salaf and ulama
I have always admired how Ustad Abu Taymiyyah defends Imam Abu Hanifa and the other Imams in front of the world, even though he will face pushback and slander.
This is what a lion of Islam looks like.
May Allah preserve you brother.
If you think Abu hanifa is like Malik or Shafaee or Sufyan or Shu'ba or Al layth or Ahmed or Al Bukhari or other than them. Then you really don't have a clue about the salaf and the scholars in the second and third century.
@@sufyanalthawri1257shut up
U r a deviant@@sufyanalthawri1257
A low-life Jahil like yourself thinks he is in a position of knowledge and piety to criticize Imam Abu Hanifa. @@sufyanalthawri1257
your a layman your comments are irrelevant @@sufyanalthawri1257
Allahumma Baarik Ustadh for this video. There are people who claim to be Hanafi & are only Hanafi in fiqh but not in aqeedah. May Allah Subhana Wa Ta Alaa safeguard and protect the honour of this noble Imaam & have mercy on him & forgive him for his mistakes & short-comings because the people have hijacked his name and unfortunately attributing false beliefs in his name and mathab. He is (always has & always will be) "our" Imaam (ie from the Salaf as Saaliheen) and not the Imaam of the Mutakallimeen.
Same way to those who have hijacked the name of salafi unfortunately.
You see there are slafis who call themselves salafis and goes against blind taqlid while their entire point is about rabee al madkhali sheikh salih ap fawzan etc et
Jazakallahu kahiran shaikh, you helped me understand the deen much better than I used to. May Allah bless you and all who are actually trying to unite the ummah. Barakallahu feekum
I don't know how express how happy I am I to hear from a shk like him may Allah protect him amen
MashAllah… that’s for clarification ❤❤❤… may Allah bless every Muslim
جزاک الله خیرا یا شیخ
There is no way of life without Islam
MashaAllah great response from Ustadh Abu Taymiyyah. I personally follow Hanbali madhab like Ustadh.
I follow hanafi fiqh
@@FardeenSk-uh1ie I was torn between following Shaf'i or Hanbali fiqh but decided to follow the latter but not much difference between them
@@brothersman524 you follow anyone you want and best is to follow fiqh which is common in your locality
@@FardeenSk-uh1ie That is right - which is why I follow Hanbali fiqh
I love this approach. Allahumma barik.
Allahumma barik ustadh you nailed it !!
Masha Allah i completely agree with Sheykh. Why Hanafy mazhab is not raising their hands is because they look to earlier evidences. For example Ali r.a and Abdulloh Ibn Masud r.a used to not raise their hands too. It's not about issues with narration of Hadith but about how Sunnah was followed by Sahabas and Tobeins. Wallohu Alam. The one who doesn't understand Usulul Fikh in their own mazhab they can't dare talk about following Sunnah and Quran in own way. How you want to follow Quran and Sunnah without Usulul Fikh???
The Statement "If the Hadith is Authentic, that is my Madhhab"
One of the most misunderstood statements of Imâm al-Shâfi‘î is his famous phrase:
“When the authenticity of the hadîth is established, that is my madhhab.”
The Ulema of the School explained, contrary to the populist approaches of “Salafîs,” that this principle addresses the jurists who are capable of sifting the abrogating and sound hadîths from the abrogated and unsound ones as well as extract the rulings from their collective evidence according to the principles of the Law and those of the Arabic language. [1] Al-Nawawî said:
What Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said does not mean that everyone who sees a sahîh hadîth should say “This is the madhhab of al-Shâfi‘î,” applying the purely external or apparent meaning of his statement. What he said most certainly applies only to such a person as has the rank of ijtihâd in the madhhab. It is a condition for such a person that he be firmly convinced that either Imâm al-Shâfi‘î was unaware of this hadîth or he was unaware of its authenticity. And this is possible only after having researched all the books of al-Shâfi‘î and similar other books of the companions of al-Shâfi‘î, those who took knowledge from him and others similar to them. This is indeed a difficult condition to fulfill. Few are those who measure upto this standard in our times. [2]
What we have explained has been made conditional because Imâm al-Shâfi‘î had abandoned acting purely on the external meaning of many hadîths, which he declared and knew. However, he established proofs for criticism of the hadîth or its abrogation or specific circumstances or interpretation and so forth.
Shaykh Abu ‘Amr [Ibn al-Salâh] said: “It is no trivial matter to act according to the apparent meaning of what Imâm al-Shâfi‘î said. For it is not permissible for every faqîh - let alone a layman (‘âmmî) - to act independently with what he takes to be a proof from the hadîth. Therefore, whoever among the Shâfi‘îs finds a hadîth that contradicts his School must examine whether he is absolutely accomplished in all the disciplines of ijtihâd, or in that particular topic, or specific question. [If he is,] then he has the right to apply it independently. If he is not, but finds that contravening the hadîth bears too heavily upon him-after having researched it and found no justification for contravening it-then he may apply it if another independent Imâm other than al-Shâfi‘î applies it. This is a good excuse for him to leave the madhhab of his Imâm in such a case.” [3]
[1] See, in particular, Shaykh al-Islâm Taqî al-Dîn al-Subkî’s Ma‘nâ Qawl al-Imâm al-Muttalibî Idhâ Sahha al-Hadîthu Fahuwa Madhhabî; Ibn al-Salâh’s Adab al-Muftî wa al-Mustaftî; and the first volume of al-Nawawî’s al-Majm‘.
[2] I.e. al-Nawawî’s times, a fortiori ours. Among those who lived in al-Nawawî’s century were al-Fakhr al-Râzî, Ibn al-Salâh, al-Mundhirî, Ibn ‘Abd al-Salâm, al-Qurtubî, Ibn al-Munayyir, Ibn al-Qattân, al- Diyâ’ al-Maqdisî, Ibn Qudâma, and Ibn Daqîq al-‘îd!
[3] Al-Nawawî, al-Majm‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab (1:64), citing Ibn al-Salâh’s Fatâwâ wa Masâ’il (1:54, 1:58-59). Cf. al-Tahânawî, I‘lâ’ al-Sunan (2:290-291).
Those statements were for their students not layman
Mashallah such wisdom for one so young. May Allah(swt) bless our scholars.
May Allah increase you and bless you and your family abundantly akhi. May Allah accept all of your work for His sake. I truly believe you are sincere and will make 70 excuses for you. Forgive those who slander you, they're either suffering from ignorance or arrogance or many something of the like, they're drinking poison hoping you'll die from it. Stay humble and steadfast, the scholars had a heavy burden and you're carrying it now, it's no light feat. May Allah make it easy for you
Following four madhab
I will suggest to see video of dr. Bilal Philips on this topic or read Evolution of Fiqh by Dr Bilal Philips
I agree, it's a very good book. It helps set the stage of how things came to be Madhab wise.
Sheykh Ibn Badran رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ said :
''As for Taqlid in Furu, it is allowed for the one who isn't a Mujtahid, according to consensus.''
[Al Madkhal ila Madhab Al - Imam Ahmad]
Madkhali zionists
This is what we need more. Suyukh who have a broad view and focus on uniting the ummah instead of seperating based on some views which some deem as flawed. Across all of the history of islam there have been diffrences of opinions. As long as they do not directly, negatively, affect ones iman, it is ok. It is beautiful to see this invitation to union. As to which imam to follow, I always say, follow the way of the imam which is mostapprochable by you. (To the smart ones that will say follow the porphet (saw) we all know he (saw) is the one we follow). However it is not obligatory for evryone to become expert on the deen. So in order to receive answers and for the sake of answering questions easily. It is best to follow the opinion of the imam which is most approchable for you. As long as it is a righteous imam ofcourse who is following accepted ahlussunnah principles.
Imagine all the fitnah and scrutiny that the likes of Ustad Abu Taymiyayah, Ustad Abduraghman Hassan , Ustad Tim Humble to name but a few must go through on a daily basis. May Allah protect them, Aameen
Ameen
Ameen
Ameen
Love my brother. Allah Ta'alaa keep you lot safe Ameen and us Ameen
If we put the mistakes of the scholars of the past and present to one side and look at what they’ve done for Islam, the reality is the scholars of the past like Abu hanafi have done way more for this religion and sacrificed way more. That in itself deserves our respect and love and good words for those imams.
The more I read about fiqh and hadees the respect for all these four imams will even become more and more. What kind of fellows these were in ummah. And now the kids just even can't read Arabic line properly talking about these imams like they have more n better daleel.
سبحان اللہ.
May Allah bless those imam of ummah. May protect us from this.
SubhanaAllah the man explained reaalllyy well about the madh-habs
MashAllah. This brother has changed from his previous vidoes. This is more balanced and accurate. May Allah bless him
Subhanallah, JZK brother, may Allah swa reward you
Imam Ibn Taymiyya'h RA was a lion of Islam. In today's time, just be a normal, God-fearing Muslim. Be good to your neighbors, get a job, support your parents, family and love your children. That is the most important thing.
Damn didn't even mention the actual important thing: the 5 prayers.
May Allah bless you shiekh abu taymiyyah. And make you one of those who do khidma for this religion in our times
Who prayed for you, Masha Allah, you are shining bright.
Anything that gets you to Janna, do it over and over again till you die, and rely and trust on Allah and fear Allah,like you've never feared and will never fear anything ever.
May Allah Swt reward you ustadh and increase you in knowledge
Thank you sir. Great advise for lay Muslims.
To add a point to what shaykh has mentioned in the 9th minute.... he explained that a hadith may have reached imam abu hanifah but the narrator was unreliable, hence imam abu hanifa may have rejected it... the reverse is also true... a hadith may be classified daeef by muhadditheen however in the time of imam abu hanifa that same hadith had reached him with an authentic chain, but by the time it reached imam bukhari, muslim, tirmidhi, ahmed, and other muhadditheen, they classified it daeef due to a later narrater who was born after abu hanifas time... note that imam abu haneefa was born in 80hijri and passed away 150hijri while imam bukhari was only born 194 hijri, so the reason for weakness post-dated abu haneefa. Hence many times people may think that a hanafi daleel is weak, whereas it is actually very strong but due to human error and the principals of a later muhaddith, the muhaddith gave a clasification of daeef.
أحسنت 👍
@inakhtive
I love Abu Hanifa but do you know hadees book Ibne abi Shayba ...go and see a whole chapter again Abu Hanifa..Abu Hanifa tried to follow Quran and sunnah so we should islam is one not four....but all emam are praise worthy for their deeds and khidmat but followers of them make them as sets.... four madhab all are sahih...is a good joke for their followers because they didn't prayed for four hundred years behind one another in kaba Mecca but now they are United against those who follow the Madhab of all imams i.e. Qur'an and sunnah and understanding of salaf and get benifit from works of all four imams. Alhamdulillah ....Islam is one we are one and imams are on one path their is nothing like four.... Allah knows the best
@@M.M.A.94did you watch this video
Brother! Then should we follow those ahadith or not?
Beautiful Advice Shaik. ❤
Assalamu Alaykum bro' you should have finished the verse though: "ask the people of knowledge if you don't know, but if the people of knowledge differ' go back to Allah(Quran) and His Messenger" pbuh(Sunnah/Hadith)
Look at the respect this brother
Shows to previous scholars Masha'Allah
All of the 4 madhab founders said that if a hadith contradicts what I said, then I follow the hadith.
And Sufyan ibn Uyanah said that Hadiths are a misguidance for everyone except for the faqih
No they say if a hadith(because not all hadith were authenticed or compiled) contridicts what i say then follow it
For mujtahids only
We wouldn't need the 4 schools if that was true ....madhabs are not based just on hadith ...there is more to fiqh then that. This would only be for the people who qualify to understand hadith . Me having a bookshelf fillmore hadith books does not qualify me
About raising the hands, Imam Abu Hanifa has a Hadith from Hammad Ibn Abi Suleiman, from Ibrahim An-Naha’i from Alqamah from Ibn Mas’ud that the Prophet pbuh will raise his hand on the first takbeeratul ihram. Imam Malik said even though the Hadith of Ibn Umar was authentic, the people of Madina weren’t doing it. So the Malikis don’t do it.
This is a reply to the points raised about Imam Abu Hanifah
1- I am a Salafi since 27 years and I travellied in the early days to learn Arabic and study with the Salafi Scholars.
2- Was Imam Ahmed from the 3rd or 4th Generation? 4th if you check by agreement, and to prove that you see in his Musnad the shortest chains of Hadeeth have 3 men between him and the Prophet SAW
3- Was Imam Abu Hanifah from the 2nd or 3rd or 4th generation? Minimum for the 3rd Generation and possibly the 2nd as it's said he met some Sahaaba RA
4- Thousands of Sahaaba settled in Kufah where Imam Abu Hanifah learnt. Thousands also stayed in Madinah where Imam Maalik learnt.
5- Imam Abu Hanifah was a Muhadith and learnt from the hadeeth scholars in Kufah who had collected Hadeeth already.
6- Imam Abu Hanifah had in his circle 30 scholars to discuss back and forth issues before deciding on an issue and from those were scholars of Hadeeth.
7- If a chain of Hadeeth had 2 or maybe 3 men in the chain and and another had 4 or 5 usually, which is more likely to have slip ups and mistakes? Which is more difficult to make sure about? So Abu Hanifah and Imam Maalik had less chance of error in Hadeeth than Imam Ahmed.
8- If a hadeeth in the time of Abu Hanifah was Saheeh then its possible the same hadeeth become Weak later as one of the extra 2 or 3 men in the chain could make mistakes.
9- Imam Abu Hanifah made Jarh wa Ta'deel.critiquing and praising the men in chains and its well recorded
To be continued ....
@@silicotron of course but we need to rectify problems within our ranks, we have errors and misunderstandings
Just watched the whole of this video -we need more Scholars like you who are advising the Ummah with such care + concern.
I would suggest you carry on your good work, dont even bother responding/watching etc to your critics - shaitan wants to distract you from the need of the Ummah.
May Allah guide and protect you.
Hes not a scholar
@@Joebammy he describes himself as a student of knowledge , But mashaa allah tbh the adaab and humility he has is like that of a real scholar. Ilm is more than studying at Madinah University or learning books my dear friend.
Assalamu Alaikum Ya Shiek Abu Taymiyyah...May Allah keeps you under HIS care ALWAYS...ALLAHUMMA AMEEN YA RABB 🤲🤲🤲
Subhaan-Allah ! Wise response regarding those who say they only follow Qur'aan and Sunnah - as if these four Madhaahib were based on the Torah and Injeel...
The last part of my answer
18- Usually when a scholar later on wrote a book in Fiqh he might have used a very weak hadeeth, along came scholars later and checked those hadeeth and declared the opinion as weak becuase the hadeeth is very weak, BUT that hadeeth alot of times was never used for the original proof, somethings else was used, either a another Hadeeth or verse or Sahaaba and so on. Look how we messed up!
19- You can't understand a Saheeh Hadeeth sometimes alone, it has other narrations mentioning the background to the hadeeth and then you got the Sahaaba and the angles from the Arabic Language which needs Usoolul Fiqh to undefrstand why and how its a proof and why the other saheeh Hadeeth is not used for this issue and so on.
20- You can not use the Usoolul Fiqh of one Madhab for the Fiqh of another madhab Text as each Madhab had its slightly different angles to approach issues and their approaches go back to the Tabi'aan and Sahaabah, not made up. Many salafis still don't understand this and caused hell breaking up families and masjids and villages all over where they went thinking theyre the saved sect like the Jehavoahs Witnesses. Plus theres 5 main different groups of Salafis, 3 of them fight and warn from each other very harshly and one of them keep splitting up every few years more and more past 30 years. The Day of Judgment its every man for themselves and only the Shafaa'a of the Prophet SAW will give you a chance After the Mercy of Allah.
21- Imam Ahmed and Shaafi'ee both built upon the Fiqh of those who came before them and Imam Shaafi'ee mastered the 4 madhabs of his time by learning with them or their students then critiqued their usool and furoo, Abu Hanifahs, Imam Maaliks, Imam al-Awzaa'iee and Imam Laith ibn Sad. Imam Maaliks madhab today is built upon the Mudawaanah which was built upon Imam Asad bin Furaat who studied with Imam Malik then Imam Muhammed Hasan ash-Shaibaani, student of Imam Abu Hanifah and this is where Imam Asd bin Furaat asked thousdand of questions in extra classes with Imam Muhammed, these thousands of questions got asked to Imam Maaliks students by him later as when he retuned to Imam Maalik he had passed away RH, and thus we can say Imam Abu Hanifah Formed the Foundation of the Fiqh of all 4 Madhabs. This is ONE REASON WHY THEY ATTACK HIM, if they put doubts into the Madhab of Abu Hanifah then all Fiqh collapses!!! And another reason is becasue he destroyed many deviants sects in debates and lastly because he was very pious and would sleep only the first third of the night in winter then pray till Fajr and between Zuhr and Asr in the Summer as the nights were short so he prayed again from Isha till Fajr, as his wife mentioned. The rest of his time from Fajr till Ishaa was teaching in his Masjid which is still there today! RH. He knew how to debate way before was a Rich Entrepreneaur so would clothe his studnets in the best clothes and look after them and he would send money to the schlolars and their students in Badhdad and Basrah whilst he was in Kufah, and studied Fiqh for 20 years from 20 years old till 40 with Imam Hammad ibn Abi Sulayman who learn from learnt from Ibraheem an-Nakha'i. Recently a MA reserch in Jordan showed how in 600 of Abdullah ibn Mas'oods fatwaas, 590 were in line with Abu Hanifahs Fatwas as he inherited his Fiqh. He made Hajj 40 times and met many scholars in Makkah and Madinah everytime and discussed and debated with them and thats why he got well known.
22- Imam ibn Abi Shaibah mentioned in the end of his big book al-Musannaf some 140 issues where he claimed Imam Abu Hanifah went against Hadeeth, this has been rebutted in 3 books, summary being Imam ibn Abi Shaibah was not a specialist in Fiqh like Abu Hanifah by a long way, hois speciality was Hadeeth mainly and these Hadeeth were understood by Imam Abu Hanifah in a different way or he prefered other hadeeth above them or he saw hidden defects/ILAL in those hadeeth which is a high level science as a Muhadith.
I hope this helps you my brother and others. It was a revision for me. Past 18 montyhs I have had re-learn a lot and discover tons of misinfortantion in many areas, so we've made a big massive mess and we need to clarify! I wrote this from my head quick as possible and hope it saves a lot of hassle and benefits all of us.
Proud To Follow The Madhab of Greatest Imam (Post Sahaba Era) Abu Hanifa (Rahmatullah Alayhi)....
What does Imam Abu Hanifa say about prayers in Airplane then?🤣🤔
@@ishaqthkrwhat did Allah or Nabi said about aeroplane prayer then. What fool are you. Somethin not invented then, is now being answered using the context about previous fatawa. Alhamdulilah fiqah hanafi has answers about aeroplane prayer : )
@@servantofallah9425akhi are you a salafi?
As a proud Mālikī (Ātharī in Creed), I found these responses from Ust. Abū Taymīyyah to be cultured, factual, sensible.
One huge issue-to the questioner -who are you to agree or disagree with a opinion within any of the madhahib? That’s the real question. Where’s your qualification? Where did you study to assume you know better?
Personally i liked explaining the 4 madhahib as 3/4 different logics to deriving proof. Each of them are correct, they just use different usool (principles) to come to their respective conclusion.
And truly the real secret sauce to madhahib is that they’re the only 4 last unbroken chains of transmission that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ.
If there is an authentic hadith contradicting an opinion of a madhab throw away the opinion
@@Isaagain that’s not how the usool fiqh works brother-respectfully learn your deen first then go online to teach.
@@Isaagain the saheeh Hadith first usool was moreso a hanbali/shafi madhhab usool. Imam Malik And Imam Abu Hanifa RA were tabaee’s.
For example; When imam Malik was deriving his usool fiqh he was the mufti of Madina at a time where sahaba were still alive, not like nowadays where people go on TH-cam and pickup some Hadith book and act like they figured it out already.
Our deen isn’t so cheap brother, people dedicated their lives to preserving it. Every step of the way was highly documented and recorded. Its not so simplistic as you make it seem. Within the madhahib system there’s a continuous chain of scholarship from teacher to student that goes back to the Prophet ﷺ. Which means within each madhhab TENS OF THOUSANDS (if not hundreds of thousands if not millions) of ulema came And added and or preserved and or amended what needed to be its not like each madhhab follows one scholar (like how the salafis follow About 3 scholars -all of which were alive within the past 100ish years but some how think they figured it out better than the millions of other ulema who dedicated their lives to this deen from the time of the sahaba to now).
Jazakallah Khairan Sheikh
Wow such a nice and humble brother abu timiya is❤❤. We need Muslim brothers like him. I following hanafi deobandi school but i love my other Muslim brothers also like salafi.
May allah bless you akhi. Stay upon the hanafi school but leave the maturidi deobandi aqeedah and accept the pure Salafi Sunni aqeedah.
One should be a pure Muslim. A follower of the Qur'an and authentic sunnah, nothing else.
Stop taking Eng Mirza sriously man. He is nobody.
@@theintuitivetruth Where engineer Ali mirza came from in this matter. I mean why did you mention him here.
The people who say don't follow Madhaib are Ignorant most of the time.
About fiq, Hadith, Science of hadith and so on.
Much love to Sheikh Abu Taymiyah, smashed it. Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu
Brother, don’t be sad. Think about all of those Imams went through many hardships including jail and beating in this way. May الله عزوجل keep you firm and strong in saying the truth
Sad to say, Some our Islamic Scholar are attacking each other especially the so called salafi scholar. May Allah unite the Muslims all around the world.
The truth is more deserving to be protected than men. So if someone opposed the truth, which is the quran and sunnah and way of the sahabah, that someone should be refuted.
May Allah bless Abu Taymiyyah
May Allah bless our Scholars the knowledge is very important and valuable ❤
Calling yourself
1.sufi
2.salafi
3. Ashari
4. Matridi
5. So on it's a bid'a
أسماء ما أنزل الله بها من سلطان
" هو سماكم المسلمين"
It’s so important to follow a Imam
🤣🤣🤣
I fail to understand how questions like this will improve the conditions of the Muslims
It all seems a bit petty to me. Maybe I'm missing something but I can't see what...
The problem with encouraging people to follow a madhab is in this day the scholars of their madhab will also be the ones teaching them aqida. Can you be sure hanafi scholars will teach the correct aqida to their students? Direct people to the scholars with the correct aqida firstly.
It is the Dunning-Kruger effect. The ones who know the least are the loudest in their opinion. They read 10 hadith, watched 24 videos and know they think they can criticise the greatest scholars of islam based on that; people, who dedicated their entire lives on studying and understanding islam.
That is pure arrogance and ignorance.
Mashallah tabarkah allah beautiful answer Shaykh
I find it strange that you have to use the quotes of modern day scholars to prove your argument. They aren’t evidence, but due to the blindness of these people if you don’t prove to them that their scholars held the opinion that just blast you with not being on the menhaj.
Exactly. They’re also “blind followes” partisan to their own specific modern scholars. But it’s so wrong to follow the scholars from amongst the salaf when you’re “salafi” ironically
The contemporary scholars during the time of abu haneefah refuted him like al awzaa'ee and sufyaan ath thawree and others
There;s no shame in saying that I am only following QURAN and SUnnah my brother , the question is not about whether these 4 mazhabs are from Bible Or Turat you mentioned that at 5:55 , but the real thing is that did our Prophet specified these 4 mahabs the answer is No , which is why one has the total right to say I am a Muslim before after and in the middle , period. This is the thing our so called Islamic scholars doesn't understand with having numerous years of reading and teaching from Islam, Inadeena GHINDALLAHEL ISLAM.
The sad thing is Imam Abu Hanifa was from the Salaf and the so-called Salafis follow four scholars our time (Khalaf): Ibn Baz, Al-albani, Fawzan and Uthaymin.
And the 4 scholars defended imam abu hanifah
subhanAllah. Thank you for the advice. May Allah forgive you and reward you
#Article: Did Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله follow Rai or Sunnah?
Imām Abu Hanīfah said “Beware of speaking about matters of Deen based on Raï (personal opinions) and hold firm to the Sunnah for the one who leaves the Sunnah goes astray” (i)
Raï means juristic opinions. Al-Tūfī said, "There are two types of raï: (1) One which is based purely on one's intellect (2) One which involves using the intellect to extract rulings from Quran and Ahādith. And this is what is meant when it is said, “this is the Raï of Imām Abu Hanīfah or this is the Raï of Imām As-Shafei.”(ii)
_In essence, Raï signifies Fiqh. Therefore, when it is asserted that Imam Abu Hanifah and his disciples were "Ashāb Al Raï", it does not imply that they disregarded Hadith and relied solely on personal opinions; rather, it signifies their proficiency in jurisprudence. Moreover, being adept in fiqh does not preclude one from also being well-versed in Hadīth. This is because there is no inherent conflict between fiqh and Hadīth, as Hadīth constitutes the recorded teachings of Rasūlullah صلى الله عليه وسلم, while fiqh represents the methodology for interpreting them._
Imām Khattābi said, “Hadīth is like a foundation and Fiqh is like it's edifice. Every edifice devoid of a foundation will collapse and every foundation without an edifice is uninhabited and dilapidated.” (iii)
Imām Tirmidhī narrated the Hadīth of Umm ‘Atiyya about the ritual bath of Zaynab رضي الله عنها and explained it by quoting the rulings of the Fuqaha (Experts in Fiqh) and then commented, *“And this is what has been mentioned by the Fuqaha and they are more knowledgeable regarding meaning of the Hadith”* (Tirmidhi no 990)
Imām Mālik said, “We only take Ahādith from the Fuqaha"(iv)
Ibn Wahb said, “Every Muhaddith who does not follow an Imām in Fiqh is misguided. If I had not studied under Imām Mālik and Abu Layth, I would have been astray too” (v)
Al-Khatīb Al-Baghdādi, said “Know that one does not become a Faqīh merely by narrating abundance of Ahādith. One only becomes a Faqīh by extracting the meanings of a Hadith and by pondering over it” (vi)
Ibn ‘Abdil Barr says, *“No Imām rejected a Hadīth except that the Hadīth was abrogated according to him, or that there was a defect in the chain of transmission*[...] People have criticized Abu Hanīfah and have labelled him as a Murji’ite[...] People were jealous of him and have levelled various accusations against him and have fabricated stories about him which are unbefitting" (vii)
Ibn Taymiyyah says “He who thinks that Abu Hanīfah or other Aimmah have preferred Qiyās over Sahih Ahādith has erred and has spoken out of speculation and desires” (viii)
Ibn Qayyim says “Abu Hanīfah preferred weak Ahādith over Qiyās. For e.g, logic demands that laughing in Salāh does not break Wudhu, but there is a weak Hadīth that suggests that laughing in Salāh break both Wudhu and Salāh and Abu Hanīfah adopted that view. So, if he was following Raï, he would have discarded the Hadīth and followed logic instead” (ix)
In fact, Imam Abū Hanīfah abhorred using intellect only to derive rulings so much that he said “To urinate in the Musjid is better than some of the Qiyās that people do” (x)
May Allah safeguard the reputation of Imām Abū Hanīfah and dispel any misunderstandings about him. Āmīn.
Yāsin Ibn Yūsuf
Shawwāl 1445
Mauritius
-----------------------------------------------
(i) Mīzān Al Kubra, ‘Abdul Wahhāb Al-Sha’rāni (973AH), Maymaniyya, Cairo
(ii) Sharh Mukhtasar Al-Rawdah, Vol3 Pg 288, Al Tūfi (716AH), Risālah, Beirut
(iii) M’ālim As-Sunan, vol1 Pg 3 , Al Khattābi (388AH), Ilmiyya, Aleppo
(iv) Tartīb Al-Madārik wa Taqrīb Al Masālik, Ibn ‘Abdil Barr (544AH), Fadhāla, Morocco
(v) Al Jāmi’ Fi Sunan Wal Adāb Wal Maghāzi Wat-Tārīkh, pg 119, Ibn Abi Zayd Al Qayrawāni (386AH), Risālah, Beirut
(vi) Al Faqīh Wal Mutaffaqīh, Vol2 Pg 159, Khatīb Baghdādi (463AH), Dar Ibn Jawzi, Saudi Arabia
(vii) Majmū' Al Fatāwa, Vol 20 Pg 304, Ibn Taymiyyah, Fahd
(viii)Jāmi’ Bayān Al ‘ilm, Ibn ‘Abdil Barr (463AH), Dar Ibn Jawzi, Saudi Arabia
(ix) ‘Ilām Al Muwaqqi'īn, Vol 1 Pg 26, Ibn Qayyim, Ilmiyya
(x) Siyar ‘Alām Nubala, Vol 6 Pg 401, Al-Dhahabi (748AH), Risālah, Beirut
Assalaamu alaikum - does anyone know which poem is playing at 11:48? BarakAllahu feekum.
It's Qur'an
@@alaHazrat35 it is a poem actually, barakAllahu feek/i
@@alhomsiyyah ok jazakallah and sorry 😀
@@alhomsiyyahIf you find it lmk إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ
I proud to be a Sunni Hanafi Muslim ❤❤
People need to understand that without an Aqeedah u can not be muslim! Some people just choose a madhab for themselves and think thats it, madhab is just for fiqh. Aqeedah is main part of islam, without aqeedah u Cant even start salah.! Also, Hanafi is a madhab, and salafi is an aqeedah, So u can be both at the same time.!
my question is salafi equivalent to Athari i mean are these both are same
You have very positive mind❤
Really love this sheikh
Which sheikh?
@@bf6724that sheikh
Ustadh* not sheikh
ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
@@taimurahmad ONE SHOULD BE NEITHER. LOOK AT WHAT HANAFIS HAVE DONE. THERE IS NO MUSLIM CALIPHATE. LOOK AT WHAT THE WAHABIS HAVE DONE. THEY ARE MAKING FRIENDS WITH DAJJALS FRIENDS. THEY ARE BOTH NOT HOW ISLAM SHOULD HAVE BEEN
. TO HAVE SPREAD PROPERLY AROUND THE WORLD. ONLY SHIA ARE THE TRUE MUSLIMS. WHICH IS WHY DAJJAL AND HIS MINIONS HATE SHIA. AND THEN THINK WHO IS MAKING FRIENDS WITH THE KHAZARIAN ZIO.NIST IS.RAEL
This is unity. I love this guy for the sake of allah. I follow the hanafi madhab but I'm a layman so it's just easier to follow a madhab. We are all of ahlus sunnah so we still can take from other madhabs
ANYBODY who follows one of the four imams school of thought will walk the path to jannah ان شاء الله. And anyone (layman, contemporary scholars) who criticizes them should understand that compared to them you’re a grain of sand in the desert and should keep completely silent.
Beautiful advice ya shaykh!
Who from amongst the so-called salafi's (Wahhabi's) knows more about Qur'an and Sunnah than Imam Abu Hanifah?!!! Who?!!!!!!
Imaam Fudayl bin Iyaad (rahimahullah) said ;
Indeed the hearts of these People have drank the syrup of (excessive) love for (Imaam) Abu Haneefah and have exaggerated about him so much so that they do not see anyone more knowledgeable than him, just as the Shee'ah exaggerated in the love of (Sayyidunah) Ali (radiallah anhu), whereas indeed By Allaah, Imam Sufyaan ath-Thawri was more knowledgeable than him (i.e. Imaam Abu Haneefah)
[Hilyat ul-Awliyaa (6/358), Chain Saheeh, via ibn abi raza]
@nomadbiker4040 You're response has absolutely nothing to do with my question.
@jamielsaddiq9692 abu haneefah is declared weak in hadeeth by muhadditheen like alBukhari, Muslim and An Nisa'ee. The post above has to do with people who have blind following and fanatacism towards abi haneefah
Jazakallaahu khayran sheikh
The most stupid thing I ever hear is that when people say whether the 4 madhabs based on Torah or Injeel
Brother, THERE IS NO TAQLEED IN ISLAM
The issue goes back to Taqlid !
Those people say you should blind follow an imam
Many hanafis dont do rafa yadain just because they blind follow Imam Abu Hanifa rah
Which is not correct ?
That’s why Ustadh mentioned the Hadith of raising the hand’s encouraging everyone to act upon that Hadith.
Admin
@@AbutaymiyyahMJ Jazakallah Khair
@@AbutaymiyyahMJوالله إني لأعتبر أبا تيمية جاهلا في هذه المسألة فنقول أبو تيمية معذور للجهل
Imaam Abu Hanifa is a scholar of ahl as sunnah wal jamaa’a. You can be a Salafi that follows a madhab, but do not blind follow
Being a Salafi in Aqeedah and Hanafi in Fiqh is fine, but don’t be a Ashari or Maturidi.
Why not brother
@@traditionalmiddlepath3773being Ash’aris and Maturidis are upon Kufr.
@@MohammedAlSharif2002
Please give me evidence from the entire ashari and maturidi school why this is the case.
Not one or two who claim they are from these schools
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 So the vast majority of this Ummah, both scholars and laymen, from the time of the Prophet ﷺ to now, are Kuffar? This is what the Khawarij say
You cannot be Salafi in Aqeedah and Hanafi/Maliki/Shafi’i in fiqh, it is a contradiction
جزاك اللّٰه خيرًا 💐
There is nothing like salafi, nor hanafi, Its all second names of ahlu sunnah wa al jam'ah, salafi = who believes the khulfa ar rashdeen, and tab'een and taba' tabeen (first and second and third generation scholars), Imam abu hanifa himself was a salafi, he believed and preached what people before him preached, you are becoming fitnah to this ummah, may allah guide you and me.
😂😂 pseudo-Salafi spotted 😂😂
Called the Shaykh as a 'fitnah' 😂😂
Hanbali Maliki Shafii Hanafi all of the four masalik are on haq as they have there rulings are based on Sunnah of Prophet and companions.
There are differences due to the methods they used to deduce rulings of shariah which doesn't make them a deviant unlike Shias who rejects the following of Sunnah but follow certain scholars and base their shariah on selective opinions of present scholars being openly biased against companions of Prophet.
The main problem of Salafi is that they don't believe in following "only" One way of deduction but on purely "text analysis" open for interpretation that may lead to wrong understanding causing fitnah. May Allah guide us all on the right path.
Assalamualaikum, Thank you ustad, i was looking to confirm some of these amswers for some time. Jazakallah.
Abu Hanifah student Abu Yusuf said he died as a jahmi
183 - Mahmud ibn Ghaylān narrated to me and said: Muhammad ibn Sa’īd ibn Salm narrated to us, from his father who said: I asked Abū Yūsuf while he was in Gorgan about Abū Hanīfah, so he said: “What do you want with him, he died as a jahmī.”
Kitaab Sunnah by Abdullah ibn ahmad
Audubillah
May Allah have mercy on the great imam رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ
Think abt ur death, Abu hanifa will not come to save u
What is jahmi
@@mr.khorsani8740heretic sect
These reports most like to be weak or based on jealousy. Allah knows the best.
We have reports of Imam Abu Hanifa himself refuted Jahmis
أبا يوسف يقول قال أبو حنيفة صنفان من شر الناس بخراسان الجهمية والمشبهة وربما قال والمقاتلية
Abu Yusaf said Abu Hanifa said:
There are two types of evil people in Khurasaan (1) Jahmiyah and (2) Mushabbiha..
[Source:
Tareekh Baghdad 13/382 Authenticated by Amr Abdul Munim Saleem.
The saying of Abu Yusaf that Abu Hanifa died whith the belief that Quran is Makhlooq [Tareekh Baghdad 13/379] is not proven Shaykh Nasir ud din alBani rahimaullah did kalam on this.
He said
وأما ما روى الخطيب (13/379) من طريق سعيد بن مسلم الباهلي قال: قلنا لأبي يوسف: لما لم تحدثنا عن أبي حنيفة؟ قال: ما تصنعون به؟ مات يوم مات يقول: القرآن مخلوق.
قلت: ففي ثبوته عن أبي يوسف نظر؛ لأن الباهلي هذا، لا يعرف بالرواية، ولذلك أغفلوه، ولم يترجموه في كتب الرجال، حتى ابن أبي حاتم لم يذكره في “كتابه” مع سعته وأحاطته، ولعل السبب في ذلك ما أشار إليه الخطيب في آخر ترجمته (9/74):
“بصري الأصل، وكان قد سكن خراسان، وولاه السلطان بعض الأعمال بمرو، وقدم بغداد وحدث بها، فروى عن محمد بن زياد بن الأعرابي، صاحب اللغة. وكان عالماً بالحديث والعربية، إلا أنه كان لا يبذل نفسه للناس”.
لكن هنا في “التاريخ” روايات أخرى عدة أن أبا حنيفة كان يقول: “القرآن مخلوق”، إلا أنني دققت النظر في بعضها فوجدته لا يخلو من قادح، ولعل سائرها كذلك، لاسيما وقد روى الخطيب عن الإمام أحمد أنه قال: لم يصح عندنا أن أبا حنيفة كان يقول: “القرآن مخلوق”.
قلت: وهذا هو الظن بالإمام أبي حنيفة - رحمه الله - وعلمه، فإن صح عنه خلافه، فلعل ذلك كان قبل أن يناظره أبو يوسف، كما في الرواية الثابتة عنه في الكتاب، فلما ناظره، ولأمر ما استمر في مناظرته ستة أشهر، اتفق معه أخيراً على أن القرآن غير مخلوق، وأن من قال: “القرآن مخلوق” فهو كافر.
وهذا في الواقع من الأدلة الكثيرة على فضل أبي حنيفة، فإنه لم تأخذه العزة، ولم يستكبر عن متابعة تلميذه أبي يوسف حين تبين له أن الحق معه، فرحمه الله تعالى ورضي عنه
[Mukhtasar al Uluw page 156]
Even after providing all the evidences and statements of kibar Ulamah, we have pseudo salafis in the comments slandering the Imam thinking they are some sort of Shaykh Al Islam because they came across a few statements in the books of the salaf without context or understanding. May الله سبحانه وتعالى guide these sick individuals.
Following madhab is not proven from the Quran and Sunnah. Allah orderes us to follow Quran and Sunnah and not any individual especially if he is not a hujjah.
You have an extremely naive and basic understanding of Islam.
Lol Sahabah blind followed. You can call that a madhab
The sahabah were followed
How can you do ijtihad as a layman? Lol stop this foolishness following a madhab isnt necessary but following a mujtahid is.
I can guarantee of deviance if one is not following an imam if not a learned sholar or mujtahid.
While in case of taqleed the deviance will be minm.
Are Aalim, Mufassir, Muhaddith, and Mujtahid yourself?!
When you are following a scholar of the current times you are also a Muqallid. The only difference is that Imam Abu Hanifa was a scholar of the Salaf and Hanafis follow him whereas you follow a contemporary scholar of the Khalaf. Every Muslim who is not a Mujtahid is by definition a Muqalid.
If they all took out from the Quran and the sunnah, then why do they called madhab's name instead of saying muslim . Did Allah and rasool say to follow one madhab? Or to called us hanafi, safi etc because of following the Quran and sunnah?
My question is how can anyone in their right mind say anything negative about the 4 Imams? These Imams are so high in their level of knowledge that we can't even get an inche close to them let alone pass them. These are the people who finished 1 Quran every night, prayed tahajaat, prayed all 5 of their salah on time, be teachers, parents mentors, husband's, and more at the same time. Yet we have the oddacity to say negative statements about them when we don't even read the Quran on daily basis, not to mention understanding it. Be careful what comes out of your tongue, you just maybe saying something wrong or false about those who were close to the Creator of all things
Finished 1 quran in one night? Who are you fooling with your stories 🤣🤣🤣
Prophet asked the sahabas if they can finish a third of quran a night and they said they can't, Prophet told them Suratul Ikhlas is equal to ⅓ of the whole quran. But you want us to believe Imam Abu Hanifa finished the whole quran in one night LMAO
@@ishaqthkr are you saying it’s impossible ?
@@ashkirali4105 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said to his companions, "Is it difficult for any of you to recite one third of the Qur'an in one night?" This suggestion was difficult for them so they said, "Who among us has the power to do so, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" Allah Apostle replied: " Allah (the) One, the Self-Sufficient Master Whom all creatures need.' (Surat Al-Ikhlas 112.1--to the End) is equal to one third of the Qur'an."
[ Sahih al-Bukhari: 5015]
@@ashkirali4105 it's not impossible
I really want to ask this questions and I need an answer for the sake of Allah. I love both Ustath Abdourahman Al Hassan and Abu Taymiyah bcux they really inspire me, but I miss seeing their videos together🥹
May Allah protect them from the faitna of the hypocrites
None. Stay away from both.
Al-Khateeb may Allaah have mercy on him said in 'At-Taarikh' (Vol.3 page 37):
And he mentioned an authentic chain to Ahmed bin 'Ali Al-Battaar:
Ahmed bin 'Ali Al-Battaar: He mentioned those people who refuted Abu Hanifah:
Ayyub As-Sakhtiyaani and Jareer bin Haazim, and Hammaam bin Yahyaa, and Hammaad bin Salamah, and Hammaad bin Zayd, and Abu' Awwaanah, and Abdul-Waarith, and Suwaar Al-'Anbari Al-Qaadhi, and Yazeed bin Zurai', and 'Ali bin' Aasim, and Maalik bin Anas, and Ja'far bin Muhammad, and 'Umar bin Qays, and Abu' Abdir-Rahmaan Al-Muqri', and Sa'eed bin Adbil-Aziz, and Awzaa'ee, and Abdullaah bin Al-Mubaarak, and Abu Ishaaq Al-Fazaaree, and Yusuf bin Asbaat, and Muhammad bin Jaabir, and Sufyaan At-Thawri, and Sufyaan bin 'Uyaiynah, and Hammaad bin Abi Sulaymaan, and Ibn Abi Laylaa, and Hafs bin Ghayyaath, and Abu Bakr bin 'Ayyaash, and Shareek bin' Abdillaah, and Wakee' bin Al-Jarraah, and Ruqbah bin Misqalah, and Fadhl bin Musaa, and 'Eesaa bin Yunus, and Al-Hajjaaj bin Artaa', and Maalik bin Mighwal, and Al-Qaasim bin Habeeb, and Ibn Shabrumah.
4:15 if you get a gift from ustadh Abu Taymiyyah you might be in trouble 👀😂😂
We love you and ustad don’t care about those who don’t understand
10:32 Ibn Al-Mubarak asked Abu Hanifa about the lifting of the hands at the ruku'. Then Abu Hanifa said: will he raise his hands to fly? Ibn Al-Mubarak was a sensible man, so he said: if he flew during the first time (when he raised his hands) he flies the second time too. Then Abu Hanifa was quiet and did not say anything.”
(Tarikh Baghdad 13/389)
Please don’t tell us the Hadith didn’t reach Abu hanifa when it did. Abu hanifa was known to reject ahadith of the messenger as reported from Al-Awzaaie: “We don't mind that Abu Hanifa spoke with opinion but we mind that the hadeeth of the prophet, salliAllahu alayhi wa sallam, came to him and he would give fatwa with something else.”
(Dhamm Al-Kalam of Al-Harawi 3/2-3)
Nice just reject the Kalam Ibn Taymiyyah رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ brought and most of the contemporary ulema
And Ibn Taymiyyah رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ gave reasons for why Hadeeth May be rejected in regards to a person giving another fatwa
He was a man of fiqh and he used Qiyas in cases where he saw applicable رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ
Your words mean nothing
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali just reject what the salaf bought
@@Markazalbukhari Ibn taymiyyah رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ didn’t understand the salafs position and you mr Alim do?
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali the statements of the salaf take precedence over the khalaf. I dare you to say imam bukahri and all the other a’aimma from the salt were wrong when it came to the criticism of Abu hanifa not only when it came to Hadith but the likes of his mistakes when it comes to irja and khurooj
went i go to madinah the one people i always want to meet and give SALAM... Offcouse RASULLULAH SAW. ..