Brother this people that put out this videos think we are dome found ,,,,,,,,, you cant make this up ,,,,,,,,,, Russia is been preach to us " the world" for years as our enemy ,,,,, when in reality the today Russia ,,,is a country who want to enjoy life ,,,, like any other country out there ,,,,, the real enemy is not a country but a corporation called "THE WORLD ECONOMY FORUM" ,,,they dominate most of the mayor business around the world an they are the one who decide were they want a war ,,whos president they want to install here ,there ,,, an on an on ,,,,,,,, NATO is part of this corporation ...... nato is the foot soldier of this corporation around the world ,,,,,, this people are mayor criminals of humanity ,,,, an justice is about to hit them with a iron hammer an yeah God bless us all.
I give a lot of credit to Russian Donbas and Crimea and now +30% of Ukraine lands and -80% of Ukraine army destroyed🤣😂reality prof that Russia win and keep on winning against neonazi west army since 2008 lol
@@zeblanmaidaynovich796 your government has seriously brainwashed your people. Nazis in Ukraine ? Come on use your brain. Putin the Evil dictator at it again. Also your government is feeding you lies, have u not seen the Russian losses ? Obviously not because there hidden from the public in Russia. Ukraine are gonna destroy use they retook 30 towns today in the Kherson region. while your troops are retreating.
This report is full of errors. Astute has a PWR 2 nuclear reactor not a jet engine. It will not carry Trident 2 as it is an attack sub not a missile sub .....
Interesting video, but no ones mentioned that part of the detection countermeasures is the use of a propulser unit instead of open propeller/'s to reduce it's acoustic signature.
The astute class does not carry nukes its an attack sub designed to hunt and destroy enemy subs and ships and onshore facilitys. Its built in Barrow in Furness only 40 miles from where i live. There quite someting when you see them out of the hangers ready for getting into service.
@@capmultser yes it the tomahawk can carry nuclear ordinance, but the Astute is still classedas a hunter killer, not a Boomer aka nuclear attack submarine. It would compare close to the seahawk, and los angeles class but a much more modern in design, while a boomer is an Akula Typhoon class (russia) or a Ohio Class (USA). Virgina class is a multi role, designed to fill the gap between a hunter killer and boomer. People still debate tho if the Astute is as deadly as a Seawolf, as the Seawolf is what the F-22 Raptor would be to submarines. Also the Seawolf is and still is so ridiculously expensive, it would not pass congress budget in building anymore.
NATO has nothing stop the stupid propaganda only the countries in nato do. NATO cannot launch anything let alone a nuke only the countries that own the military can. You think that will happen with nato authority alone your crazy
Maybe - but that doesn't mean Russia wouldn't destroy NATO nations in 30 seconds, twice over :). Then again, the dude didn't even know the difference between a nuclear *ATTACK** sub, and a nuclear ballistic missile sub. So let's not be too serious about anything here ;) Keyboard warrior.
Russia has proven itself to be very weak. In fact it now relies on tanks and armoured vehicles from the the 1980s I think without doubt Russia would lose very fast. It may have more nuclear bombs but it’s technology is so Poor !!!
,,Întreaga lume înțelege perfect cine sunt cu adevărat rusi: niște papuași înapoiați și sălbatici din lumea a treia cu pretenții de măreție,,- Konstantin Borovoi - Politician rus
Whichever country(even NATO country) was willing to trust USA was foolish... Even If Russia would go against Poland for instance, USA would never defend Poland. Why? Because of Russia´s overwhelming power. USA know, that all their big cities would turn in to melted radioactive glass within 45 minutes.... That is why I would not blame USA for being not credible, because any NATO country expecting that USA would accept nuclear war with Russia or China is just foolish...
The US did it easy .. Hiroshima. Nagasaki.., of course..it's ok for the US to start wars and destroy the world. But when it comes to another country having nuclear weapons, that country is a terrorist state. Selling weapons and robbing oil from other countries was always a good business for the US.
@@leonardnordenstrom6239 Yes, well I've lived quite a bit longer than I previously thought, so at 64, I'm not afraid but there are still a few things I would like to do before the long sleep. 😉
Let Russia and its Allies do their thing... they think they wont suffer also.. LETS SEE.. WHAT WILL BE RESULT... THEY THINK THEY WILL LIVE ALSO... BY THEIR WRONG DOING... THINK ABOUT IT..
let's hope fools like you can one day learn how to tell the truth and admit your mistakes aka NATO poking polar bear's eyes for thirty years to finally making Russia saying enough is enough. congratulations from China for your coming winter without Russian oil and gas . btw we can't help laughing watching this video : our dancing hypersonic missiles can surf and do a few laps around the Earth before hitting their targets , no need to send submarines to your doors , they just sit muted on our surrounding ocean floors 24/7 , easy to deploy and protect from your torpedoes (each sub will be surrounded by lots of tiny noisy ROVs to attract all unfriendly fires)
The Astute class boats are `hunter-killers` & don`t carry or are ever likely to carry nuclear warheads. It`s the Vanguard class that carries the UK`s nuclear deterrent, a very capable submarine which will be replaced by the Dreadnought in the coming years. It`s easy to overestimate the UK`s nuclear deterrent when in fact it`s the US`s huge fleet of Ohio class boats that will deter any thoughts of survival by whatever nation that may consider a pre-emptive strike.
Quite right. But people on these military channels simply can't resist the urge to fluff up the UK's forces. Forever exagerating just how powerful we actually are.
They keep nukes for the cruise missiles and nuclear tipped torpedoes, what would be the point of having a nuke powered sub and not have enough firepower to wipe the enemy out ? Lol seems you know nothing matey, we are British so most of the navy is armed with nukes, even boats without nuclear power. 🤣
@@davidrobertson5700 britain posess no nuclear torpedos its you who knows nothing all this information is not classified and easily available i think you have been watching too much horseshit on youtube son 🤣
Nice to see the subs built in my home town in the UK, we're currently in the middle of building several new subs of the astute class yet it's the trident vanguard class subs that carry our nukes presently, to my knowledge the astutes are nuclear powered but don't fire nuclear warheads. Our subs are more than a match for anything the Russians have, we often know exactly where there subs are when they come near our waters but they have zero chance in following ours.
in 30 seconds? i dont think you dare even to bark at Russia during 30 sec, since you lost to Russia in Syria or Vietnam)) even Afganistan kicked you out...) Russia?give me a break) Emma and her two moms doesnt like this idea😆
Theses so called nato super power lost to Taliban opium farmers and they want to take on Russia lol eema and her two moms ain't the things that Russia fears someone tell this delusional armchair generals.
@@francescozambaldi8212 The US is guilty too often of the mistake Germany made in WWII. They hedged their bets on small numbers of well made high-tech weapons while the Soviet Union and the US made large numbers of good-enough weapons. We know which system worked. I worry about that. I worry that if the F-22 is up against large numbers of good but not great fighters it will not measure up. That's what happened to the F-15 when the Israelis were flying theirs headlong into a squadron of Syrian fighters. They locked on with their radar and fired their missiles. But the missiles sailed right through the Syrians without a hit. The Israelis had to dispatch them the hard way, which they did. We had good weapons in Vietnam but a lousy doctrine. The F-4 did not even have a gun for dog fighting. It was getting shot out of the sky by the much inferior Mig-17. We still rely on heavy fighters. I don't think it would hurt to have a light, inexpensive, highly maneuverable fighter jet in our arsenal. Something like the F-5.
@@matchrocket1702 I can agree with your toughts on Germany, but to be honest US and Russia both relies on having large number of bulky stuff... they count on outnumbering the enemy. On the other hand we know from history that german quality in small numbers can do nothing against big waves of lower quality weapons in general. What makes me dubious is that no data on ukranian casualitites has been revealed, why? maybe too much losses?
@@francescozambaldi8212 The Ukrainians are fighting on the razor's edge. They can't afford to lose any ground and that includes intel. My suspicion is that they are doing better than is portrayed in reports but that they are using up supplies and ammunition as fast as it comes in. If they are not able to build up a cache of weapons and supplies they won't be able to launch a sustained offensive.
No it doesn't. It's the American equipment, like the M777, that keeps breaking down and requiring maintenance. Russian artillery just keeps on going and going, like the Energizer bunny.
You really think Russia has deployed its best weapons in the Ukraine war? They most likely have reserved their elite troops and finer weapons as a buffer for their real rivals, NATO and the US. Hence it would be a strategic mistake to gauge Russian military strength on what has been seen in Ukraine.
Yup. They really have. And now they have almost run out of precision munitions. They are recruiting convicts and the homeless / mentally unwell to “fight”. And facing wholesale defeat by a superior military.
You are deluded....The Russian military is over hyped ,they believed their own propaganda. The failure in Ukraine is a mirror in leadership,arms and moral....If you want soldiers to fight and win ...give them a cause,AND DO NOT LIE.....Putin has lied and sent soldiers to die...Some of those soldiers HAVE COMMITTED WAR CRIMES ( giving Ukraine even more cause and belief)
The fact is that just one Sarmat missile with multiple warheads from Russia would destroy the U.K., two would absolutely leave it a wasteland. Talk of nuclear war is stupid. If it gets to that then the northern hemisphere will be toast. It’s just not viable.
Lol as soon as they launched they would be flattened there are several subs camped around Russia for this very purpose and they know it thats why they havnt even putin the nutcase isn't that dumb
The fact is that the UK 🇬🇧 can and would destroy them back 🙄 maybe not all wasteland but Russia would cease to exist as a country, there would be little areas all around the country with few people left, they would be detached from anyone else, they would resort to being canabols, before the nuke winter got them, or they staved to death, personally I'd rather be be in the centre of the blast 😀 God save the king 🤴 🙏
@@RHINOTEJAS That's not a good question, that something a delusional Nazi comes up with, like talking about the Endsieg 1945 in utter denial of reality and reason.
Russia square is 17 100 000 km². GB square is 243 809 km². So GB never has any chance to destroy Russia by nuclear weapon. Otherwise Russia can wipe out UK in direct conflict.
aiming nuclear weapons at the states targets would be the largest cities followed by military bases especially navy and airforce. With the army bases they just need to hit a large city that's nearby but the same applies to Russia and any country the only reasonably safe military forces are those either already in the air and ships well out to sea and all subs as they can just hide away under the oceans. Surface ships are easily to find due to satellites looking down on different areas. Air craft as long as a refuelling plane is flying nearby can stay in the air for some time and can land anywhere that has a straight long clear area. another target would be oil fields as many ships and subs and all aircraft need to be able to refuel only ships and subs left running will be nuclear ones.
Starlink Satelites are particle beam weapons the weapons track every nuclear silos On earth and will destroy every nuclear launched rocket in 2 seconds and will vaporise them. Starlink is a military operation and is connected behind the scenes to space force..
The best assurances against the use of these nuclear weapons is when peace becomes the one prevailing thought of all nations, and when America and Russia especially begin to rethink their own relationship and are willing to engage in dialogue and seek ways to improve the condition of man, with mutual respect and dignity for all, starting from a position that we are all mortal and breathe the same air.
Dovid2000 it is not at all just America and Russia anymore China is a much bigger threat than Russia. China wants Taiwan like a wolf wants a lamb and there's a lot of tension between China and India. Russian policy for decades has been to annex other countries by military force try to keep expanding. There have been the minorities such as Kamikaze and the radical jihadist that don't value life as the Western world does they will do a lot of power because of that. Those ideologies or attitudes are not easily changed. The United States doesn't grow its country by stealing other people's country. Man's nature is generally somewhat lazy, lustful and greedy, my money is on a strong very good military peace through strength. I'm just happy that the Brits are allies and not the enemy. When it comes to anti-submarine warfare your Navy is as good as any might be the best. It's good you're strong with the carriers again.
So at 6:08 we learn that the sub is not powered by a nuclear reactor, but by a jet engine. This miraculous jet can run 12 years without refueling. Idiots.
Still this NATO submarine hadnt moved from the toilet!!!!The war is happening since 1 year and Mighty Russia had already annexed many territories belonging to Ukraine👍🤣🤣🤣👍👍
The acoustic transmission from hull to water is one of the most important factors in stealth. It's not just about masking engine noise... When you're in the water, the water is denser, heavier, vibrates and transmits waves. These waves can travel unbelievable distances. What you could hear from 10ft away, you can now hear from 50 feet away... It's not that it's louder, or more intense, it's a larger falloff radius. With submarines being mostly nuclear power, this means no engine noise, no motor noise, and no exhaust/bubbles. Instead what you are listening for is electric and mechanical noise. Relays switching creating noticeable bangs, hatches opening and closing, pumps winding up, mechanical clunks, tings, bangs... These will usually come along with noticing the propeller too. A: You either hear the tings and bangs first and then realize there is a slight churning to the white noise behind that sound B: You notice the churning sound, followed by tings, clunks, and bangs There is no skill to hearing the churning first I believe, as it's rather random as to whether a sub is moving forward or resting, along with what the crew inside might be doing, and the design of the propeller. Either or, in the case a submarine moves, the sounds will reveal secrets about other acknowledged sounds, and can confirm whether or not you're hearing a sub, a vessel, or random noise. For example You hear loud clunks and bangs, but there's a small engine diesel sound, that'd be a smaller vessel of some kind, could be fishing, or cargo, depends on size of motor and it's running speed. You hear a low faint churning, a weird rotation in phase in the white noise, but no mechanical noise. This is where you'll probably get nervous because it's a sub in stealth. The crew have been ordered to touch nothing unless ordered to, including flushing toilets or running water. You'll want to listen to the faint rotation for other smaller noises behind it to confirm you're hearing a sub, if you can't find anything then you're also listening for the beginning of cavitation, or you're counting phases per second to try to get a mental image of the propeller. Is it 3 blades, 4 blade, 5, 6, 7? (There's a software that will show propeller profile automatically) Base this off the rotation, create a starting point based off overlapping phases, that will also help your ear hear what you're seeing on screen to confirm it's correct. Propellers with 3-4 blades are usually ignored because they're usually used on fishing or sport vessels and are a pain with cavitation... This is where the acoustic tiles come in, they make it more difficult to confirm that it's a sub, by masking interior hull noise, that noise is the main culprit, you can hear what is underwater, vs above water. The idea would still the same, to restrict crew from leisure and basic needs, such as running water. They should all remain at post and everyone will try to remain quiet, like you're hunting deer. Any crew member dropping a wrench, even a plate or mug, it will transmit that sound into the hull, and then to the water, and may very well be loud enough to be picked up on passive. The tiles act as a buffer between the hull and water to mask smaller noises. The dolphin thing, this may very well be real. It wouldn't surprise me, but no it wouldn't be the engine noise... My idea after learning how sonar worked was to mask the churning and mechanic sounds to passive with louder sounds that wouldn't actually make sense. omni-directional sound that cannot be aimed at, just the general direction of where the source is, but no one will do that to dolphins or whales because they can be anywhere and swim around and do their own thing for god knows what reason. To a sonar operator dolphin or whale sounds would be normal, you cannot avoid hearing them but it also creates a mask for smaller noises, relays clicking might be masked behind a dolphin voice, or pumps can be masked with the sound of whales, missles loading can be masked by the sound of an air pocket bursting. You turn your propeller so slowly that it's corkscrewing you forward in the water, not creating pressure difference but rather swimming gracefully at a crawling speed. No rotation noise, the idea is to mimic 1:1 natural sounds that occur on a daily basis, things that a sonar operator will say "Ok that's just whales.. Or maybe this" and will mask/bleed over the waterfall display/spectrograph, and will also mask it to the human ear too, little do they know a relay has clicked, a valve opened, a pump slowly spun up, a torpedo has slid into the tube and locked itself in.. EVEN if they do hear you, they will think you're stationary when you're actually crawling forward. When things go south you go for bigger noise like a whale, spin up the propeller enough to push and you can make a move that will be confusing, they may not notice you spun up propeller and pushed yourself forward a lot more, even if they know you're there because the whale is much louder and isn't something a submarine would do. As you get closer you slowly fade the sound to a rear yagi speaker to shoot the sound backwards and make it appear as if it's moving away, when it's actually getting closer. Keep in mind, these sounds are very faint and distant anyway and are almost inaudible, the sounds you actively omit can be the same if not louder, the louder = bigger falloff radius and seem closer than you actually are, or even further away. The goal is to play off of that falloff radius and make it appear elsewhere. You can accomplish the same in HAM radio using an array of Yagi directional antennas and the way it bounces off the ionosphere. The only way to know where is to calculate that bounce, how many bounces, at what angle. Radio tracking is extremely hard to pinpoint, you can only get a general direction but never the location until you get close enough to see the antenna physically with your own eyes, the same occurs in the water with sound. It's best to play off that bounce too. You see a terrain such as a cliff, you can bounce off that cliff to make weird angles, that will appear in different directions.
Very interesting and informative, and looks like deception tactics are ever-increasing four submariners. Thanks for the information you sound like you have been there
"... nuclear fish..." ? I didn't get, why you called it a fish. Might be, because I just over heard it or were you calling it a fish, because people said, it would sound like a dolphin? I'm sorry for such a stupid question. And yes, I DO know that dolphins are no fish but mammals, obviously. At this point I don't think, that there are any more or less reasonably intelligent people around, not knowing that. Maybe I just didn't get it, since english isn't my native language.
@@leonardnordenstrom6239 That's why we have the N.R.O. [National Reconnaissance Office] to track every nuke on planet Earth. If he does get suicidal and launch a nuke, it will be destroyed before it even launches.
So many mistakes in this video its painful to watch. You'd think the creator would have googled some of these facts beforehand and for God's sake, please learn how to pronounce British names if you're going to use them
Are you a clown? Look at the Ukraine mess, they can't even penetrate kyiv for almost a year now. 🤣🤣🤣 Soviet Union can't even win the war with US alone, US win over Soviet. And Soviet are consist of many Counties including Russia back then. Now that Soviet is gone/dissolved, do you think Russia alone can defeat US and especially the NATO? Stop dreaming or saying none sense and comparing real world to a movie.
That’s presuming it can afford the upkeep and upgrade of its nuclear weapons on a GDP less than Italys. We can already see Russia isnt the big world superpower it wants us to think it is. It’s why they’re struggling in Ukraine.
Probably not, Russia has proved to be a second best in Ukraine with much of its technological weapons failing to be operational. I guess one or two would be enough to to get the UK, but some of the US and other parts of Europe would get through it.
@@johnmaguire2185 Considering just one Satan 2 is enough to destroy the whole of a country the size of France or Texas The Russians have 50 at the moment and that's only those they have 6600 huge nuclear warheads too. That's if it were only Russia you might have a combined force of many nuclear countries China and N Korea too. Even if it were only Russia and the Pentagon recently admitted it has nothing that can stop the Mac ~9 Satan. You see, if we know nothing else, we DO know there will not be any US left.
I think the population in the world 🌎 hoping to hear which country is more developed than to hearing dangerous weapon of distraction we leaders who will spend billions even trillion to develop the world 🌎 to be the better place to live in.
The world is about peace ✌️ nobody needs to die were all god's children at the end of the day don't matter who we are what colour we are where we are from make the world a better place like that song by Michael Jackson make the world a better place
@@kaluludhianvi you really must be in drugs or still dreaming about 1971. Am in x military for the United States 🇺🇸 the strongest nation in the world 🌎. Have a great day
all that we have right now cannot count to the Chinese so I would like to see the new plan to come to the Chinese because the Chinese cannot be Tapper tell the world you'll hear it from the black Chinese man
And Russia is not going to retaliate with 1000s of nukes. LMAO... Russia can also destroy every NATO country... Stop making these claims of 30 seconds and Russia is gone.
Is like thinking 🤔 of Russia fleet and defenses be just waiting for their territory be completely destroyed Just one question have they us and NATO found the Russian submarine yet 😂😂😂
What I do know is if Russia attacks England or nato we will respond in kind! And if that's nuclear than so be it but they will be destroyed as well! That's what makes history👍🏴☠️
Someone mentioned that the astute Class cannot and will not carry any nuclear weapons as this is not this true. Sould the UK the choose to arming their subs with nuclear bombs with the USA bombs. The UK can do so with the latest weapons coming from USA and because the astute classes are relatively new they will have the ability to have nuclear bombs on board.
Do you guys think when NATO hit Russia, Russia will look at the sky and counting the stars. 😂
Brother this people that put out this videos think we are dome found ,,,,,,,,, you cant make this up ,,,,,,,,,, Russia is been preach to us " the world" for years as our enemy ,,,,, when in reality the today Russia ,,,is a country who want to enjoy life ,,,, like any other country out there ,,,,, the real enemy is not a country but a corporation called "THE WORLD ECONOMY FORUM" ,,,they dominate most of the mayor business around the world an they are the one who decide were they want a war ,,whos president they want to install here ,there ,,, an on an on ,,,,,,,, NATO is part of this corporation ...... nato is the foot soldier of this corporation around the world ,,,,,, this people are mayor criminals of humanity ,,,, an justice is about to hit them with a iron hammer an yeah God bless us all.
Very strong defence against terrisom very good NATO forces protecting all people in NATO forces God bless you all
Nonsense and propaganda
amen to that .......
Let's hope Russia is more sensible than we know, we only have one world ,let's keep it .
I do not give a lot of credit to Russian missiles. Look at everything else of theirs.
I give a lot of credit to Russian Donbas and Crimea and now +30% of Ukraine lands and -80% of Ukraine army destroyed🤣😂reality prof that Russia win and keep on winning against neonazi west army since 2008 lol
They’re not.
@@zeblanmaidaynovich796 your government has seriously brainwashed your people. Nazis in Ukraine ? Come on use your brain. Putin the Evil dictator at it again. Also your government is feeding you lies, have u not seen the Russian losses ? Obviously not because there hidden from the public in Russia. Ukraine are gonna destroy use they retook 30 towns today in the Kherson region. while your troops are retreating.
I don’t like Russian aircraft as they using there miltary for bad but like air displays of Uk and American aircraft
This report is full of errors. Astute has a PWR 2 nuclear reactor not a jet engine. It will not carry Trident 2 as it is an attack sub not a missile sub .....
I think we all want these wars to end not escalate.
Tell Putin
Russia will be destroyed as well as America so it makes no sense
@@frozenllama23 America is your daddy boy, Russia is finished.
its time to put these toys to the test
Amen. End to war.. Peace to mankind
Interesting video, but no ones mentioned that part of the detection countermeasures is the use of a propulser unit instead of open propeller/'s to reduce it's acoustic signature.
Joint mock battles: where everyone gets high and makes fun of each other.
The astute class does not carry nukes its an attack sub designed to hunt and destroy enemy subs and ships and onshore facilitys. Its built in Barrow in Furness only 40 miles from where i live. There quite someting when you see them out of the hangers ready for getting into service.
but it carry's Tomahawk ballistic missiles with a range 1000 miles, still deadly threat to anyone. would love to see one up close.
@@capmultser yes it the tomahawk can carry nuclear ordinance, but the Astute is still classedas a hunter killer, not a Boomer aka nuclear attack submarine.
It would compare close to the seahawk, and los angeles class but a much more modern in design, while a boomer is an Akula Typhoon class (russia) or a Ohio Class (USA).
Virgina class is a multi role, designed to fill the gap between a hunter killer and boomer.
People still debate tho if the Astute is as deadly as a Seawolf, as the Seawolf is what the F-22 Raptor would be to submarines. Also the Seawolf is and still is so ridiculously expensive, it would not pass congress budget in building anymore.
NATO has nothing stop the stupid propaganda only the countries in nato do. NATO cannot launch anything let alone a nuke only the countries that own the military can. You think that will happen with nato authority alone your crazy
That's what the guy think.
Just uploading any news which suits them
Maybe - but that doesn't mean Russia wouldn't destroy NATO nations in 30 seconds, twice over :). Then again, the dude didn't even know the difference between a nuclear *ATTACK** sub, and a nuclear ballistic missile sub. So let's not be too serious about anything here ;) Keyboard warrior.
Russia has proven itself to be very weak. In fact it now relies on tanks and armoured vehicles from the the 1980s
I think without doubt Russia would lose very fast. It may have more nuclear bombs but it’s technology is so Poor !!!
,,Întreaga lume înțelege perfect cine sunt cu adevărat rusi: niște papuași înapoiați și sălbatici din lumea a treia cu pretenții de măreție,,- Konstantin Borovoi - Politician rus
Whichever country(even NATO country) was willing to trust USA was foolish... Even If Russia would go against Poland for instance, USA would never defend Poland. Why? Because of Russia´s overwhelming power. USA know, that all their big cities would turn in to melted radioactive glass within 45 minutes.... That is why I would not blame USA for being not credible, because any NATO country expecting that USA would accept nuclear war with Russia or China is just foolish...
Total BS. You've been drinking too much Kool-Aid.
@@BobBob-uv4vc why?? Look at the war with Ukraine Russia is getting defeated so badly
@@Superutubeking No, it's not. And it is invading with a numerical disadvantage, since it is using only a small portion of its military.
It's difficult to imagine anyone wanting to destroy the world by launching nuclear weapons.
well, eventuality must be considered love.
The US did it easy .. Hiroshima. Nagasaki.., of course..it's ok for the US to start wars and destroy the world. But when it comes to another country having nuclear weapons, that country is a terrorist state. Selling weapons and robbing oil from other countries was always a good business for the US.
@@leonardnordenstrom6239 Yes, well I've lived quite a bit longer than I previously thought, so at 64, I'm not afraid but there are still a few things I would like to do before the long sleep. 😉
We've lived under the MAD doctrine assisted by the philosophy of Brinkmanship since the 50s. How we've made this far represents a lot of luck.
Let Russia and its Allies do their thing... they think they wont suffer also.. LETS SEE.. WHAT WILL BE RESULT... THEY THINK THEY WILL LIVE ALSO... BY THEIR WRONG DOING... THINK ABOUT IT..
30 seconds? not 3 seconds? u r AMAZING
Better set Putin to trial in a court of international law in Kyiv
HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Yes be afraid of the Astute class subs, but wait till the Dreadnought class enter service.
let's hope fools like you can one day learn how to tell the truth and admit your mistakes aka NATO poking polar bear's eyes for thirty years to finally making Russia saying enough is enough. congratulations from China for your coming winter without Russian oil and gas . btw we can't help laughing watching this video :
our dancing hypersonic missiles can surf and do a few laps around the Earth before hitting their targets , no need to send submarines to your doors , they just sit muted on our surrounding ocean floors 24/7 , easy to deploy and protect from your torpedoes (each sub will be surrounded by lots of tiny noisy ROVs to attract all unfriendly fires)
wait till the Dildonator XXL fascist eliberator class enter service
@@DharmaRotary Heard it was being crewed by only women.
do what is necesssary
Go Russia vs NATO Uses Power Full Sarmat & Tsunami Torpedo Posidon Missile Testing...
its not Russia that is the warmongering state. The US and UK are the two that love conflict and war.
The Astute class boats are `hunter-killers` & don`t carry or are ever likely to carry nuclear warheads. It`s the Vanguard class that carries the UK`s nuclear deterrent, a very capable submarine which will be replaced by the Dreadnought in the coming years. It`s easy to overestimate the UK`s nuclear deterrent when in fact it`s the US`s huge fleet of Ohio class boats that will deter any thoughts of survival by whatever nation that may consider a pre-emptive strike.
Quite right. But people on these military channels simply can't resist the urge to fluff up the UK's forces. Forever exagerating just how powerful we actually are.
@@Makeyourselfbig We've yet to lose a war unless you count the 100 years war in the 14th century
They keep nukes for the cruise missiles and nuclear tipped torpedoes, what would be the point of having a nuke powered sub and not have enough firepower to wipe the enemy out ?
Lol seems you know nothing matey, we are British so most of the navy is armed with nukes, even boats without nuclear power.
🤣
Actually you could be wrong, - the US fleet could be the FIRST neutralised in such a conflict - leaving other Nations fleet to respond! 🧐
@@davidrobertson5700 britain posess no nuclear torpedos its you who knows nothing all this information is not classified and easily available i think you have been watching too much horseshit on youtube son 🤣
This headline is a JOKE!
Nice to see the subs built in my home town in the UK, we're currently in the middle of building several new subs of the astute class yet it's the trident vanguard class subs that carry our nukes presently, to my knowledge the astutes are nuclear powered but don't fire nuclear warheads. Our subs are more than a match for anything the Russians have, we often know exactly where there subs are when they come near our waters but they have zero chance in following ours.
Russia does not need know where your new subs are. Russia surely knows the locations of all UK's cities on the earth.
@@leqiaop1840 as we know theirs stupid, no one wins those wars.
Your country’s war ship and air craft carriers often breaks down in the sea or cant even sail out to sea!!!!!!
So dont be too happy hahahaha 🤪
@@KP-ki7mz funny, you say that as Russians aircraft carrier had to have a tug boat sail with it on the very rare occasion it worked, you thick muppet
@@KP-ki7mz slating the UKs air craft carriers ? Russias only 1 has been out of commission since 2017 lol!😂 and won’t be in active service until 2024!!
in 30 seconds? i dont think you dare even to bark at Russia during 30 sec, since you lost to Russia in Syria or Vietnam)) even Afganistan kicked you out...) Russia?give me a break) Emma and her two moms doesnt like this idea😆
Theses so called nato super power lost to Taliban opium farmers and they want to take on Russia lol eema and her two moms ain't the things that Russia fears someone tell this delusional armchair generals.
Ti ricordo che anche la Russia in Afghanistan le ha prese!
And the 6000 + Russian Nukes can wipe out the whole Nato out of the map too
Maybe but how many of them still working?and do they have arrow 3 defence system againat nuclear?or thaad?the answer is no
@@Ασσουρμπανιμπαλ does Nato have hypersonic missiles? Answer is no
@@Ασσουρμπανιμπαλ does Nato have the biggest Nuclear bomb ever created? Answer is no
@@JDDC-tq7qm have you ever test your biggest nuclear bomb no
@@Ασσουρμπανιμπαλ yes we have it's called Tsar Bomba that's the biggest Nuclear bomb ever created go search it up
I'm not saying this will be the case but all too often when Russian equipment is put to the test in real combat, it fails.
Like US equipment... remember Vietnam my friend....
@@francescozambaldi8212 The US is guilty too often of the mistake Germany made in WWII. They hedged their bets on small numbers of well made high-tech weapons while the Soviet Union and the US made large numbers of good-enough weapons. We know which system worked. I worry about that. I worry that if the F-22 is up against large numbers of good but not great fighters it will not measure up. That's what happened to the F-15 when the Israelis were flying theirs headlong into a squadron of Syrian fighters. They locked on with their radar and fired their missiles. But the missiles sailed right through the Syrians without a hit. The Israelis had to dispatch them the hard way, which they did. We had good weapons in Vietnam but a lousy doctrine. The F-4 did not even have a gun for dog fighting. It was getting shot out of the sky by the much inferior Mig-17. We still rely on heavy fighters. I don't think it would hurt to have a light, inexpensive, highly maneuverable fighter jet in our arsenal. Something like the F-5.
@@matchrocket1702 I can agree with your toughts on Germany, but to be honest US and Russia both relies on having large number of bulky stuff... they count on outnumbering the enemy. On the other hand we know from history that german quality in small numbers can do nothing against big waves of lower quality weapons in general. What makes me dubious is that no data on ukranian casualitites has been revealed, why? maybe too much losses?
@@francescozambaldi8212 The Ukrainians are fighting on the razor's edge. They can't afford to lose any ground and that includes intel. My suspicion is that they are doing better than is portrayed in reports but that they are using up supplies and ammunition as fast as it comes in. If they are not able to build up a cache of weapons and supplies they won't be able to launch a sustained offensive.
No it doesn't. It's the American equipment, like the M777, that keeps breaking down and requiring maintenance. Russian artillery just keeps on going and going, like the Energizer bunny.
Why any small problem in Europe it becomes ww issue?
Two nuclear bombs dropped in Japan did not affect the entire world but Europe, it’s suddenly ww.
Because europe has more bigger influence to the world
You really think Russia has deployed its best weapons in the Ukraine war? They most likely have reserved their elite troops and finer weapons as a buffer for their real rivals, NATO and the US. Hence it would be a strategic mistake to gauge Russian military strength on what has been seen in Ukraine.
Yup. They really have. And now they have almost run out of precision munitions. They are recruiting convicts and the homeless / mentally unwell to “fight”. And facing wholesale defeat by a superior military.
You are deluded....The Russian military is over hyped ,they believed their own propaganda. The failure in Ukraine is a mirror in leadership,arms and moral....If you want soldiers to fight and win ...give them a cause,AND DO NOT LIE.....Putin has lied and sent soldiers to die...Some of those soldiers HAVE COMMITTED WAR CRIMES ( giving Ukraine even more cause and belief)
LOL
Ha,ha,ha.
The Moskva ,was one of their best weapons, ooops, lol, look what happened to that
The fact is that just one Sarmat missile with multiple warheads from Russia would destroy the U.K., two would absolutely leave it a wasteland. Talk of nuclear war is stupid. If it gets to that then the northern hemisphere will be toast. It’s just not viable.
You make a good point but a good question , “Are these missiles in working order? “ have they been maintained ? Does Russia even know how to use them?
Lol as soon as they launched they would be flattened there are several subs camped around Russia for this very purpose and they know it thats why they havnt even putin the nutcase isn't that dumb
The fact is that the UK 🇬🇧 can and would destroy them back 🙄 maybe not all wasteland but Russia would cease to exist as a country, there would be little areas all around the country with few people left, they would be detached from anyone else, they would resort to being canabols, before the nuke winter got them, or they staved to death, personally I'd rather be be in the centre of the blast 😀 God save the king 🤴 🙏
E dai, os misseis da Otan também tem varias ogivas, cada uma direcionada para um alvo, isso é comum, porque a Russia não seria destruída também?
@@RHINOTEJAS That's not a good question, that something a delusional Nazi comes up with, like talking about the Endsieg 1945 in utter denial of reality and reason.
I know i have said this before, but you were a huge inspiration for me to start my channel. Keep up the good work!.
How about lets stop destroying things for a change
Russia square is 17 100 000 km². GB square is 243 809 km². So GB never has any chance to destroy Russia by nuclear weapon. Otherwise Russia can wipe out UK in direct conflict.
I can’t believe that Mark Miley still has a job!
Putin Poseidon can destroy these NATO subs and walk away freely to kalingrand 😈😆😆😆😆👀👍
Wrong about this submarine, never carried nukes
Russia of course has only rubber ducks.
From a Retired Naval Nuclear Electrical Engineer much respect to the British Submariner’s. Thanks for the hat and the drink.
i am totally impressed.
Never? USA never can destroy Russia maybe in the dream
Nato submarine can wipe out Russia in 30 second read the title of this video
@@noexit7089 look like you haven’t see the new submarine of NATO
That wipe Russia in 30 second. Goggle it you will see was on TH-cam many time
Russia has enough nukes to destroy NATO’s countries 5 time’s over
@@sub3ero984 nato got a new submarine to wipe off Russia in 30 second
Check out
Wrong sub. Britain’s Trident D5 is on Vanguard class boats. Astute is a hunter killer.
That submarine will be sunk in 30 seconds. Belogorod submarine report.
aiming nuclear weapons at the states targets would be the largest cities followed by military bases especially navy and airforce. With the army bases they just need to hit a large city that's nearby but the same applies to Russia and any country the only reasonably safe military forces are those either already in the air and ships well out to sea and all subs as they can just hide away under the oceans. Surface ships are easily to find due to satellites looking down on different areas. Air craft as long as a refuelling plane is flying nearby can stay in the air for some time and can land anywhere that has a straight long clear area. another target would be oil fields as many ships and subs and all aircraft need to be able to refuel only ships and subs left running will be nuclear ones.
Starlink Satelites are particle beam weapons the weapons track every nuclear silos
On earth and will destroy every nuclear launched rocket in 2 seconds
and will vaporise them.
Starlink is a military operation and is connected behind the scenes to space force..
i stand by the submarine navy, even though i am surface.
NATO doesn't have its own submarines. They belong to member nations.
The best assurances against the use of these nuclear weapons is when peace becomes the one prevailing thought of all nations, and when America and Russia especially begin to rethink their own relationship and are willing to engage in dialogue and seek ways to improve the condition of man, with mutual respect and dignity for all, starting from a position that we are all mortal and breathe the same air.
Dovid2000 it is not at all just America and Russia anymore China is a much bigger threat than Russia. China wants Taiwan like a wolf wants a lamb and there's a lot of tension between China and India. Russian policy for decades has been to annex other countries by military force try to keep expanding. There have been the minorities such as Kamikaze and the radical jihadist that don't value life as the Western world does they will do a lot of power because of that. Those ideologies or attitudes are not easily changed. The United States doesn't grow its country by stealing other people's country. Man's nature is generally somewhat lazy, lustful and greedy, my money is on a strong very good military peace through strength. I'm just happy that the Brits are allies and not the enemy. When it comes to anti-submarine warfare your Navy is as good as any might be the best. It's good you're strong with the carriers again.
We already tried that it didn't work . We tried with the A-hole Chinese that didn't work either . If you want peace prepare for war .
Will the U.S give us a few minutes warning to kiss our children goodbye?
So at 6:08 we learn that the sub is not powered by a nuclear reactor, but by a jet engine. This miraculous jet can run 12 years without refueling. Idiots.
Every time news is always saying this,that, will destroy Russia but until now Russia is still standing firm what a joke.hehrhehahaha!!!.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The TRAF-al-gar? Do you mean the Tra-FAL-gar? Sheesh.
Not sure this guy would get that. Maybe help him out by saying Trafalgar is three syllables, not two.
Still this NATO submarine hadnt moved from the toilet!!!!The war is happening since 1 year and Mighty Russia had already annexed many territories belonging to Ukraine👍🤣🤣🤣👍👍
"Traffel gar" 😂😂😂😂 classic yank
Russia has one just like that. It may actually be even better,,
Wow woopie BUT can it eliminate Hunger and poverty in NATO countries
I DON'T Think SO
His there any human beings in Russia who could easily close putins mouth and closed his eyes ?????
Starting with you then there is no need to worried about Putin.
Why ?? .
YEAH.....Let's try and get LIKES because of a nuclear weapon attack......Your Childers body's will be turned to ashes......So just leave it alone!
The acoustic transmission from hull to water is one of the most important factors in stealth. It's not just about masking engine noise...
When you're in the water, the water is denser, heavier, vibrates and transmits waves. These waves can travel unbelievable distances. What you could hear from 10ft away, you can now hear from 50 feet away... It's not that it's louder, or more intense, it's a larger falloff radius.
With submarines being mostly nuclear power, this means no engine noise, no motor noise, and no exhaust/bubbles. Instead what you are listening for is electric and mechanical noise. Relays switching creating noticeable bangs, hatches opening and closing, pumps winding up, mechanical clunks, tings, bangs... These will usually come along with noticing the propeller too.
A: You either hear the tings and bangs first and then realize there is a slight churning to the white noise behind that sound
B: You notice the churning sound, followed by tings, clunks, and bangs
There is no skill to hearing the churning first I believe, as it's rather random as to whether a sub is moving forward or resting, along with what the crew inside might be doing, and the design of the propeller. Either or, in the case a submarine moves, the sounds will reveal secrets about other acknowledged sounds, and can confirm whether or not you're hearing a sub, a vessel, or random noise.
For example
You hear loud clunks and bangs, but there's a small engine diesel sound, that'd be a smaller vessel of some kind, could be fishing, or cargo, depends on size of motor and it's running speed.
You hear a low faint churning, a weird rotation in phase in the white noise, but no mechanical noise. This is where you'll probably get nervous because it's a sub in stealth. The crew have been ordered to touch nothing unless ordered to, including flushing toilets or running water. You'll want to listen to the faint rotation for other smaller noises behind it to confirm you're hearing a sub, if you can't find anything then you're also listening for the beginning of cavitation, or you're counting phases per second to try to get a mental image of the propeller. Is it 3 blades, 4 blade, 5, 6, 7? (There's a software that will show propeller profile automatically) Base this off the rotation, create a starting point based off overlapping phases, that will also help your ear hear what you're seeing on screen to confirm it's correct. Propellers with 3-4 blades are usually ignored because they're usually used on fishing or sport vessels and are a pain with cavitation...
This is where the acoustic tiles come in, they make it more difficult to confirm that it's a sub, by masking interior hull noise, that noise is the main culprit, you can hear what is underwater, vs above water. The idea would still the same, to restrict crew from leisure and basic needs, such as running water. They should all remain at post and everyone will try to remain quiet, like you're hunting deer. Any crew member dropping a wrench, even a plate or mug, it will transmit that sound into the hull, and then to the water, and may very well be loud enough to be picked up on passive. The tiles act as a buffer between the hull and water to mask smaller noises.
The dolphin thing, this may very well be real. It wouldn't surprise me, but no it wouldn't be the engine noise... My idea after learning how sonar worked was to mask the churning and mechanic sounds to passive with louder sounds that wouldn't actually make sense. omni-directional sound that cannot be aimed at, just the general direction of where the source is, but no one will do that to dolphins or whales because they can be anywhere and swim around and do their own thing for god knows what reason. To a sonar operator dolphin or whale sounds would be normal, you cannot avoid hearing them but it also creates a mask for smaller noises, relays clicking might be masked behind a dolphin voice, or pumps can be masked with the sound of whales, missles loading can be masked by the sound of an air pocket bursting.
You turn your propeller so slowly that it's corkscrewing you forward in the water, not creating pressure difference but rather swimming gracefully at a crawling speed. No rotation noise, the idea is to mimic 1:1 natural sounds that occur on a daily basis, things that a sonar operator will say "Ok that's just whales.. Or maybe this" and will mask/bleed over the waterfall display/spectrograph, and will also mask it to the human ear too, little do they know a relay has clicked, a valve opened, a pump slowly spun up, a torpedo has slid into the tube and locked itself in.. EVEN if they do hear you, they will think you're stationary when you're actually crawling forward. When things go south you go for bigger noise like a whale, spin up the propeller enough to push and you can make a move that will be confusing, they may not notice you spun up propeller and pushed yourself forward a lot more, even if they know you're there because the whale is much louder and isn't something a submarine would do. As you get closer you slowly fade the sound to a rear yagi speaker to shoot the sound backwards and make it appear as if it's moving away, when it's actually getting closer.
Keep in mind, these sounds are very faint and distant anyway and are almost inaudible, the sounds you actively omit can be the same if not louder, the louder = bigger falloff radius and seem closer than you actually are, or even further away. The goal is to play off of that falloff radius and make it appear elsewhere. You can accomplish the same in HAM radio using an array of Yagi directional antennas and the way it bounces off the ionosphere. The only way to know where is to calculate that bounce, how many bounces, at what angle. Radio tracking is extremely hard to pinpoint, you can only get a general direction but never the location until you get close enough to see the antenna physically with your own eyes, the same occurs in the water with sound. It's best to play off that bounce too. You see a terrain such as a cliff, you can bounce off that cliff to make weird angles, that will appear in different directions.
Very interesting and informative, and looks like deception tactics are ever-increasing four submariners. Thanks for the information you sound like you have been there
Russia has lost 2000 tanks for NOW in Ukraina and probably war has ended for them.
Yes!
It’s pronounced “new-clee-are” (not new cue-lar). C’mon now.
pray for peace and to end the war
That's good & then Russia destroy us back. lol
"... nuclear fish..." ? I didn't get, why you called it a fish. Might be, because I just over heard it or were you calling it a fish, because people said, it would sound like a dolphin? I'm sorry for such a stupid question. And yes, I DO know that dolphins are no fish but mammals, obviously. At this point I don't think, that there are any more or less reasonably intelligent people around, not knowing that. Maybe I just didn't get it, since english isn't my native language.
i had no idea that the brittains are so well armed...Good on you! Cheers.
It’s better never ever talk about Nukes, otherwise dictator Putin & his Russian publics may vanish from this wonderful Universe.
Russia is 99.99999% bluff
can we depend on that?
@@leonardnordenstrom6239 That's why we have the N.R.O. [National Reconnaissance Office] to track every nuke on planet Earth. If he does get suicidal and launch a nuke, it will be destroyed before it even launches.
So many mistakes in this video its painful to watch. You'd think the creator would have googled some of these facts beforehand and for God's sake, please learn how to pronounce British names if you're going to use them
England alone could destroy Russia
The word "nuclear" is pronounced “new-clee-er” - - - That's “new-clee-er” - not "nu-cu-lar" ........ “new-clee-er” !!!
"This NATO Submarine Can Destroy Russia in 30 Seconds" ..... 😀🤣😂🤡
Yes You just missed out the fact that in doing so Russia would also wipe the US and UK off the map
Are you a clown? Look at the Ukraine mess, they can't even penetrate kyiv for almost a year now. 🤣🤣🤣 Soviet Union can't even win the war with US alone, US win over Soviet. And Soviet are consist of many Counties including Russia back then. Now that Soviet is gone/dissolved, do you think Russia alone can defeat US and especially the NATO? Stop dreaming or saying none sense and comparing real world to a movie.
He said that at the start of the video...
That’s presuming it can afford the upkeep and upgrade of its nuclear weapons on a GDP less than Italys. We can already see Russia isnt the big world superpower it wants us to think it is. It’s why they’re struggling in Ukraine.
Probably not, Russia has proved to be a second best in Ukraine with much of its technological weapons failing to be operational. I guess one or two would be enough to to get the UK, but some of the US and other parts of Europe would get through it.
@@johnmaguire2185 Considering just one Satan 2 is enough to destroy the whole of a country the size of France or Texas The Russians have 50 at the moment and that's only those they have 6600 huge nuclear warheads too. That's if it were only Russia you might have a combined force of many nuclear countries China and N Korea too. Even if it were only Russia and the Pentagon recently admitted it has nothing that can stop the Mac ~9 Satan. You see, if we know nothing else, we DO know there will not be any US left.
I think the population in the world 🌎 hoping to hear which country is more developed than to hearing dangerous weapon of distraction we leaders who will spend billions even trillion to develop the world 🌎 to be the better place to live in.
The world is about peace ✌️ nobody needs to die were all god's children at the end of the day don't matter who we are what colour we are where we are from make the world a better place like that song by Michael Jackson make the world a better place
What the people thinks is logic is totally different from what the government thinks is logic
As in American soldier the civilians doesn't have the smallest idea how the government works they are to naive.
@@kaluludhianvi you really must be in drugs or still dreaming about 1971.
Am in x military for the United States 🇺🇸 the strongest nation in the world 🌎.
Have a great day
all that we have right now cannot count to the Chinese so I would like to see the new plan to come to the Chinese because the Chinese cannot be Tapper tell the world you'll hear it from the black Chinese man
The title is really rediculous.LMAO
(6.5 min) Just where is this JET ENGINE !!!! fitted on a submarine
Propaganda I love it when a country chooses to focus on there interest now you call their leader a dictator 🐨😃😃😃😂
What the hell is a jet engine doing powering a nuclear submarine. These guys have their facts wrong.
I have done a submarine in 1 second! The video creator will eat him in 5 seconds! Good luck
That is great to hear. My leader may well be napping in the time of need.
🇷🇺👍😊💪
Yes. Russia will be desolated.
haha i think u have a dream ,,,if u look more on the Russia submarine u und the real power so try to learn more ,,,
Dude its nuclear not nukiller
Hypersonic is the new technology for this evil activity.
Anything coming in from orbit will be "hypersonic"
@@davidgrigg7398 Doesn't hurt to honestly dig deeper.
Any body know what inventory of US weapons remains in Afghanistan?
The western world is a safer place with UK Subs stalking the depths!
The two brown gentleman’s faces when that rock set off...
Funny sons...💯💯💯🏴🏴🏴🤣🤣🤣🤛🤛🤛👌👌👌☝️☝️☝️
I'd like to know more about those British 'Traffle-gar' submarines.
Lord Admiral Nelson expects the pronunciation Trafalgar!
Escalate
Hahaha yes, gave me a chuckle too. Americans don't know much about Nelson. (Just joking, enjoyed the vid.)
The robots have a ways to go.
I mean all the time we see new design worpons but are men women who designed a plan's of creating peace ✌️
And Russia is not going to retaliate with 1000s of nukes. LMAO... Russia can also destroy every NATO country... Stop making these claims of 30 seconds and Russia is gone.
NATO waffle! They have the same that can turn you into just a big smouldering heap!
Yeah, so better not use them, unless you like the idea of living in the Mosco Metro
It’s basically a copy of the US cruise missile
Note: Russia can destroy the UK in 10 sec using your logic
Step one, learn how to pronounce nuclear.
'This NATO Submarine Can Destroy Russia in 30 Seconds' That's right, however Russia can destroy this boat and Britain in 0,003 second.
*US submarine. NATO is nothing without the US
In short periods world will end now Jesus Christ back in the world
Is like thinking 🤔 of Russia fleet and defenses be just waiting for their territory be completely destroyed
Just one question have they us and NATO found the Russian submarine yet 😂😂😂
What I do know is if Russia attacks England or nato we will respond in kind! And if that's nuclear than so be it but they will be destroyed as well! That's what makes history👍🏴☠️
The PWR 2 is Not a jet engine!
Russian paying consequences. This karmas job
Someone mentioned that the astute Class cannot and will not carry any nuclear weapons as this is not this true.
Sould the UK the choose to arming their subs with nuclear bombs with the USA bombs.
The UK can do so with the latest weapons coming from USA and because the astute classes are relatively new they will have the ability to have nuclear bombs on board.
And Russia is doing quads with nuclear submarines on a actual problem, New YorK. With a slight delay.