@@creescrazylife901 you dont have to worry about Russia much here at home, we have much more suffocated weaponry thank to Trump that is, only problem is having the right guy in the White House to use them without hesitating!! But I'm with u I pray we never have to find out!!🇺🇸💪💯
@@creescrazylife901 amount doesn't mean everything. It's all about how effective they are. Also, both probably have a shit ton more than what the public knows or what we 'think' we know.
My dad, as an eighteen years old sailor, served on a submarine at the BATTLE OF JUTLAND in World War One, from May 1916 to June 1916. His brother serving with the Guards Division was 'lost' fighting on the SOMME
We honour their service while we strain ourselves to find a way that overcomes war. New thinking and new faith is needed. My father fought in Holland in WWII.
Submarine in world war 1 ?? Really ? Wow I thought submarines are started use second world war onwards . U2 boats . I never knew the submarines had a very vast history
I wrote a 16 page paper in college about the Trident submarines. This was in 2003. From what I remember each sub has the capacity to take out an entire hemisphere. I want to say each had 24 missiles with multiple warheads.
Ohio class submarines have 24 hypersonic missiles trident d5 with 8 nuclear warheads each can be sent to different target's. enough to wipe out all Russia and China. there is 18 of those subs
@@ralphharper2414 actually they are 475 kilotons each and can all be sent to different target's. that's 8x24 475kiloton nuclear warheads on just one sub there are 18 of those subs. that's 3456 475kiloton nuclear warheads enough to wipe out all of Russia and some
@@thepearl28. That is a much better reply than SinCity’s comment. It does seem we all have deep deep tribal attitude & are programmed to dislike others who live differently from us, & that applies to all.
You are right. But we do feel the nerves! I served on a Dutch submarine. Walrus class. In a NATO exercise we attacked many ships, including sinking the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 after two attacks and we managed to sneak away. We also sank many of the Roosevelt's escorts, including the nuclear submarine USS Boise, a cruiser, several destroyers and frigates, plus the command ship USS Mount Whitney. After many stressful hours the celebration makes it all worth it.
I served as a Missile Technician Chief on the Ohio, and 3 other smaller SSBNs. It is dedication to duty, pride and professionalism that drive us. The Ohio and her 'siblings' have been out there since the early 1980's. And yes, they could do what is said, although the men and now women would only do so on the orders from the President.
@@GWS-schouwen I assume the Carrier and its escorts was expecting your attack and was listening for you, but failed. Reassuring for you, not so much for the sailors on the carrier.
@@minerran That's right. They knew we were out there, but didn't detect us and expect us from the direction and place we came from. I think the strength of this class, besides the fact that these subs are small and silent, that they are very good in undeep waters while American subs are good in deep waters of at least 200m/650ft.
I served on the USS Michigan SSBN 727 Blue Crew from 1987 to 1989, as a nuclear reactor operator. She was still a FBM sub back then. She was converted from an SSBN to a SSGN during her refueling overhaul at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard a few years ago. SSGNs are outstanding theater/tactical platforms; not to mention the spec ops capabilities that they now provide.
The U.S. Navy doesn't have "A" submarine that could destroy Russia, it has 14 of them. France has another 4 such submarines, as does the U.K. The very expensive policy of nuclear deterrence through a credible committment to massive retaliation is cheaper than the conventional wars it has prevented. It's a hell of a way to keep civilizations from destroying each other, but it's the best we've come up with so far.
Russia's navy is significantly weaker no doubt. Their strength lies with their huge amount of mobile land based Topol ICBM's. Just as effective but far less expensive. Biden is very wise not giving Ukraine the capabilities to attack Russia beyond their border. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has gone poorly to say the least but they have always been willing to accept massive losses in order to achieve victory. They've already inflicted $960 billion in damage on Ukraine. It's going to be a very long winter for them. No matter how long it takes, Russia will prevail.
I served on the Ben Franklin, SSBN 640 (G) from 87 to 91 (part of the 41 for freedom). I went on a Trident once...amazing compared to the boat I was on
Bad news everyone. ANY nuclear armed submarine these days has the capacity to destroy almost any one country. Ours, theirs, anyone’s. Nice world we live in, isn’t it?
I was in NUCSUBLANT in the late sixties. I was assigned to the USS HUNLEY AS31. We had NUC SUBS tied along side for repairs and replenishment. These were bad ass subs.
The Trident II SLBMs actually have up to 15 MIRVs. They only carry 8 due to START treaties. Yet, if we ever used them, we certainly wouldn't be worried about treaties...
that wouldnt destroy any country.. people over estimate the blast radius of these weapons and fallot.. Its hillarious people live in the cities that were bombed by the USA in japan.. :)..it only takes a few years to recover not decades
@@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yes that’s true, but that was also in 1945 with a much smaller warhead in relative terms. In the event of an all out war, you’d have hundreds (or thousands) of much more powerful nukes blowing dust and debris into the atmosphere. Nuclear winter is a real, and terrifying, outcome.
LOL first build hypersonic weapon, Russia is far far ahead of USA in nuclear weapons,hypersonic weapons, missiles defense system, iCBM technology, USA nuclear weapons are 15 kilo tons while Russian are 50 mega ton, Russian nuclear bombs are far far damaging than USA, and also Russian iCBMs are faster and can go longer than USA, Russia is the one who built rocket engines to usa. Your own generals said the USA have no defense against Russian hypersonic weapons. What a joke.
@@johnlopez1604 Russia's nuclear capability is ancient like the rest of it's military. That's been proved in Ukraine where they took a battering by western armaments. U.S. and Europe have a missile defense system, better intelligence, quicker response, Russia would be annihilated before it's first hypersonic intercontinental missile even enters orbit. United States will never advertise it's capabilities, like Russia, because this is a sign of fear. The two militaries are miles apart, U.S. main adversary isn't even Russia, it's China. Russia is now a bankrupt state.
I’m talking about all militaries when I say this. It is crazy, even scary amazing when you see how far mankind has come with technology in just 100 years. Maybe its just me but it seems like in the last century man has had an explosion in the tech world. And thats only considering what we know about. They are usually many decades ahead of us, the general public.The first “Powered,” flight was less than 120 years ago. 1903 to be exact. In far less than 100 years we went from flying 20 or 30 MPH to flying well past Mach 1 which is the speed of sound. Close to 750 MPH. If you want something perfected, turn it into a lethal weapon. Man will devote every dollar and every hour to making it even more deadly. I think its pretty obvious where we are headed.
We are nearing the crescendo of this , all this will culminate into either a dystopian hell on earth with AI dominating and enslaving us or wipe us out entirely. And Jesus is coming soon :D
@orrett - I think one needs to distinguish between the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia & the US (and the PRC too) vs. their people. The peoples of the world of course, do not want war. The Russian people certainly do not. But the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia and the US want what is in their "interests". Its clear Putin does want war with Ukraine, and their land. Probably Transnistria & Moldova too. Maybe the Baltics. He already has Belarus, and hegemony of Kazakhstan. But the US Permanent State too has a history of waging wars to further its "interests". --We were notorious for using force to further our economic interests in Latin America pre-WW2. And pretexts were arranged (Gulf of Tonkin, Iraqi WMD) for wars against N. Vietnam and Iraq. No elected or appointed officials were ever held accountable --- via the equivalent of a Nuremburg Tribunal for those "mistakes" -- keep in mind, 2 MM southeast Asians died from that conflict. And America just "forgets" to hold anyone accountable. ... American "mistakes" are often more bloody than Russian maliciousness.
Although that is a fact-based statement.... The U.S. would suffer horrendous loss as well. It would be over for both countries as well as the entire population of the Earth.
@@gpnulife The first mistake in war is under estimating your enemy. Now I don't believe the people of Russia are our enemy, but just like the USA, Russia probably has weapons not on the hooks and not known.
In 1971 I was a B-52 pilot assigned to alert duty. Our targets (2 bombs) were near Moscow. I don’t think we would have made it to our target due to their defenses, but since our arrival would have been much later than the impact of our nuke missiles, maybe we would.
50 years latee and that scream of the b52 still intimidates the world! Can't imagine what it must have been like during those really intense years when Ivan was looking very scary
The overall number of both Trident subs and their nuclear-warhead missiles initially deployed has been cut back in the last 15 or so years as the boats' missions have been modified to some beyond nuclear launch, replaced by conventional cruise missiles. Or some missile tubes have been designated as subject to modification in order to serve as 'launch' pads for SEAL-type infiltration mission teams. The fewer subs to track, the more assets adversaries like Russia/China will have to look for and perhaps find the remainder, by default. The fewer missiles available to launch, the fewer that Russian/Chinese anti-missile defenses will have to contend with. Plus, the Tridents were never intended or built as first-strike weapons against hardened land-based ICBM sites---just like their Minuteman counterparts. So in the aggregate, the original deterrent value has been reduced to an extent that it is increasingly marginal. Likely still the strongest, most capable part of the overall U.S. deterrent, but a reduction in force has not helped.
They would have a better shot at shooting down one of our B2's than an ICBM. And shooting down a B2 is damn hard. Basically it would take an extremely lucky shot.
If I was an enemy of the United States I wouldn’t make the mistake you just made… There’s more than enough in our arsenal to kill the entire planet 20 times over no matter where the detonations actually occur, the food supply of the entire planet would be contaminated within 96 hours and won’t return to an edible state for at least 60 to 150 years… no human would survive more than a few months… I’d say we still have more than plenty if we should need them… And if ours aren’t enough the other 15,000 that would be launched in retaliation would finish the job… I’d say you are very incorrect that it’s not every bit the deterrent is very much as strong as it’s ever been… And I wouldn’t be so sure there are fewer out there, the newer physics packages are tiny, many more than you think could be lurking in few delivery packages, and let’s not kid ourselves as to the number of devices in orbit shall we… And they don’t have to destroy hardened targets my man, they just have to get within a couple hundred miles of the grain feilds, that’s how they kill!
He was wrong because everyone will be dead. RAD will contaminate the water and soil, crops will not grow and die and anyone that is left after the first strike will either kill themselves or die of starvation or radiation.
Yes U.S Navy has a submarine that could destroy Russia and China in minutes. But dont forget the Russian navy got a similar submarine, which carries 20 ballistic missiles of 10 nuclear warheads in each one.
Nuclear fallout from even one destroyed nation would destroy this world for thousands of years or more...three would be no winner...all human life would be extinguished and any life that would possibly make it underground would live to die there in their fancy coffins.
You know if the shit did hit the fan and nukes were launched. I'm sure rich people living in there lavish shelters would still live like rats underground for awhile but after the bombs go off their supplies would eventually run out! Either way let's just hope it never happens and we don't let idiot crazy dumbasses like trump or putin kill us all!🤞
To the point the U.S makes this stuff unclassified scares me more, I probably think they have someone in replacement or something better then the submarine mentioned in this video.
@John Cliff lol u mean the bellarus of Putin or the israelíes immigrants/setters?! Stay home and do another job, actually u r worse, crazy Putin claims that they r defending thier borders but Bush and blair and their very well paid mercenery(paid soldiers r merceneries) traveled accross the globe for that!
That is why Russian wants to be left alone. But no, the US pushes nato to their boarders to encircle them, poking the bear. When they plead and plead, no response until they react. And the Commedian in Ukraine does not know he is being used. He wants nato to confront Russia on his behalf and to start nuclear war.
As someone who went thru the US Navy nuke program years ago, nothing will surprise me regarding the capability of our underwater Navy. I would not want to be the first hostile nation to test us!
Having worked on Nuke missiles, There is never a good solution to using them. Out unit had enough warheads to destroy the east coast of the US from Canada to the coast. And that was just our unit.
@@slowgoat6089 It would not be a nuclear explosion. The warheads are not armed until they are launched. It takes a certain firing sequence for a nuke to go off. Otherwise, it is just the TNT that explodes. But it will leave radiation scattered about, just not the same level as a nuke detonation.
I remember desert Storm people were shocked with the weaponry that we were pulling out. Just imagine what we have today didn't even have smartphones then we were still using push button phones with cords and maybe pagers
That's why I laugh at the people who think our military is weak. Secrecy is a good thing to have. The enemy will find out what we have when we use it on them. No reason to parade your game plan for the world to see.
No One wins that sir is why we have them - No one wants to kill there family Oh except evil ones , Ones who dont have a soul & It aint Russia, USA = AIPAC .
If it makes you feel better, we spend nearly six times as much on healthcare. If we could cut that in half we could double our military spend AND pay off a $1 trillion in debt a year.
I was stationed in Norfolk when one of the Ohio's came in for SSGN refit. The awesome thing was I got to reunite and serve with two of my bootcamp buddies during this time while also being present for one of them becoming a father. That was a great day I remember my chief of the sonar division on USS SSN NewPort News 688 telling me I had a priority duty to get my ass to the base hospital. That was a mildly stressful but great day.
Back when Robert Oppenheimer developed the A Bomb to what happened in the 40s to the tech of the power of the weapons we have today is unimaginable. Hope that day never comes !
One-hundred-ninety-eight warheads from a single Trident submarine can take out 24 cities? I heard that the fireball alone on a 500 kiloton weapon would be as big as Manhattan. That leads me to believe that a single Trident can take out more than 24 cities.
They target cities with multiple warheads, to account for possible "duds" or targeting errors. And I think you may be confusing the effects of a multi-megaton warhead. You don't get into TRUE city killing warheads until you are in the 2-3 megaton range. Which are about as big as we (the US) have. We definitely have the know how to create multi hundred megaton warheads, but the effects of one that large are unknown, largest ever detonated was the "Tsar Bomba" at approx 50 megaton.
Yes, I guess it's true that a single Trident can destroy only 24 cities. My thinking was wrong. But 24 cities would be over half the population of virtually all the countries in the world. Pretty gruesome stuff. I think we can reduce nuclear arsenals world wide.
These are really inexpensive submarines. At 6:58, the video reports that they cost "4 dollars minus $6 billion to manufacture". That is one cheap nuclear powered submarine. I will pay $4 dollars for one please.
Drop nuclear bombs on civilians knowing that there will be no response, as is the American way. But Russia and China are not Japan in 1945. Russia has more nuclear weapons than the US.
There was a History teacher in a foreigner video saying that Putin took his wife and family to a special place in Siberia in a special underground, subterrenean place. Let's assume if it's true, then it's very serious, why he would do that, is he planning or expecting a nuclear or something similar to happen?
@@davidhynes what about American crimes against humanity, Syrria Iraq to name just 2, American ordinance is enabling you're freinds the Saudis to kill 330 000 civilians including children in the Yemen, much hypocrisy
Russia, China, and even North Korea also have the nuclear ability to destroy the United States. Thus the hope that the reality of mutually assured destruction will prevent a nuclear attack by any one, or combination, of countries. Unfortunately, some of these world leaders don’t appear to be mentally stable, and that is scary.
@@ajcso7844 The radiation cloud, that develops after the explosion, would be spread by the wind. The radiation alone could potentially kill millions of people and make vast areas of land uninhabitable. According to scientific analysis that I’ve seen on TH-cam. In any event the enormous devastation from the initial detonation and the spreading radiation poising would make survival unlikely for millions of people. The infrastructure would be destroyed by the explosion and the ability to get food, water, and medical treatment would be extremely difficult at the very least. It might be a blessing to die in the initial explosion rather than experiencing a slow and painful death in the aftermath, IMO.
I remember a quote some where between the POTUS and the USSR General Secretary from the cold war: "I can destroy you a thousand times over. Yes Mr. President, but I only need to destroy you once."
Wait, that was a very calculating statement. Including MIRV, 192 nuclear warhead missiles from one Ohio class nuclear submarine can wipe out 24 cities he said ? Each of these missiles can carry a 8 Thermo nuclear warheads at 450 kt each. Let’s not forget this hydrogen nuclear bomb is more powerful than an atomic bomb. H bomb Is more powerful than A bomb. The 15 kt A bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. One of the eight MIRV’ed warheads is many times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. A 450 kt Thermo nuclear hydrogen bomb, 192 of them, From one Ohio class nuclear powered submarine, out of 14 such Subs, would seem to destroy far more than 24 cities, unless the goal is to crater each of the 24 cities including its suburbs and downtown 1 mile deep into utter Nuclear oblivion overkill.
It's gonna happen someday anyway....let's hit him at his weakest and then China too before they get even more powerful with the help of our greedy corporations...😉 Let's roll. Ps....build your fall out shelter.
No doubt of certain coastline all around the world their are submarines sat with enough nuclear weaponry that would make Armageddon look like just a hot afternoon... 🔥 🥵
@@FFNeptune what do you expect me to say to the Russians or more to the point the Russian milary. They have embarrassed themselves enough so I will abstain
@@FFNeptune but my Russian friend Russia is not conquering Ukraine, it has just had it's arse handed to itself in the North and is struggling to hell in the south and that's without mentioning it's flagship has been sunk. That victory parade in May is going to one hell of a job to pull off that's for sure
@@scottaubrey9046 flagship sunk n everything still ? Wht u gonna do the fight is on and russia is winning and ye russia is using a very less amount of military power in Ukraine and we r also selling oil to our allies like India so don't worry ukraine gonna go down and u guys provoked russia to do it
An ICBM is armed with multiple nuclear warheads. These are in the nose of the missile and they are contained within re-entry vehicles. So, if a submarine has 18 nuclear ICBM's and each ICBM has a dozen, or so warheads, one nuclear submarine is able to target well over 200 locations. These submarines are doomsday machines.
While Russia signed a decree to use nuclear bomb if necessary, USA may need congressional approval to do so or even start a war. Russia also have several nuclear submarines seating next to USA coast, as you "destroy Russia" in a minute, Russia can do same away from home. USA understand the consiquences of a nuclear war with Russia.
Yes, but doesn’t work that way. Approval can be retrospective. Executive order can approve the order to launch depending on circumstance. US has a no first strike policy, not a no instant retaliatory response. Russia MUST know that MAD applies just as much today as it did in October 1962
Russia have more Nuclear warheads ,,incase of an attack its who fires fast without esitation because they are massive destruction with no winners ,,but all that matters is who fires fast for more accuracy
The nukes aren't guided by satellites. They used the fixed position of the moon and the stars to locate their targets. Its a brilliant computer based concept...read up on it...
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV, Jesus Christ is the only way.
As the U.S. have Allies now closer to the Russian and Chinese border,along with advancements in ICBM capabilities and programing ,a reduction in Naval Nuclear dispersion is not really a loss.Once it starts, frankly there will be little left.
As the U.S. have Allies now closer to the Russian and Chinese border,along with advancements in ICBM capabilities and programing so you admit that you are bullying other? once the war start there is no winner.
Can Montana Class Battleships finally get Built ? Fit Them with Missile Launchers As well as with the 18 Inch Guns. Their Armor Belts Would be Great Against Missile Attacks
@@patrickbukowski9667 Can they be fitted with Anti Aircraft & Anti Missile Defenses . Also replacing two of the Main Turrets with Missile Launchers Would make a huge difference.
@@DavidWilliams-el4zt it can still be seen and heard. We could track a ship, tell you what type, how many screws how many blades per screw, how fast they were turning, what heading they were on. Then sink them with a couple torpedoes.
@@DavidWilliams-el4zt They can and our work with laser defense has come quick lately. Once this is perfected hypersonic is obsolete for ship killing. There will always be more advanced ships and defense just as other tech advances
@@hirdleyreid5796 what ?? By treaty USA and Russia has around 5000 nuclear warheads, China 400, France and UK around 200 each. US Defense budget 1.1 trillion $, Russia 48 billion $, China 209 billion $
@@ulrichkristensen4087 US Defense budget is NOT 1.1 trillion $ and you should not calculate Russia's and China's budgets in US dollars they are not buying their subs in US...
Couldn’t you imagine an ancient times if there were ancient aliens that have submarines and the native people see the submarine when they didn’t have metal they would think that was some kind of sea monster is crazy huh
we have had missile subs capable of destroying country's since the late 50s, i served on one built in the 60s. this is not new. better subs these days but the ability to destroy is old
If you listen to me commentary it states England has these weapons. There is no English navy, army or airforce. They are part of the United Kingdom with the submarine base located in Scotland.
@@ianurquhart9379 The good news is if you have subs with Trident 2s your country is off the "Country To Invade List". Taiwan and Ukraine need a few Boomers out there lurking around in the depths. Then see if China or Russia drops in.
Like nothing else, these U-boats give peace of mind to me. I hope we can stay ahead of Communist and Arab technology in submarine stealth and missile tech. God bless you U.S. Navy submariners. 💛🙏🏽
The US should know. It is the only country which has used nuclear weapons on civilians. Not to mention industrial scale chemical weapons on civilians. Not to mention development of Biological weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine. What a great country!
@@earljohnson2113 yeah well its caused tons of damage to humans and birth defects in humans.. Among the Vietnamese, exposure to Agent Orange is considered to be the cause of an abnormally high incidence of miscarriages, skin diseases, cancers, birth defects, and congenital malformations (often extreme and grotesque) dating from the 1970s.
What difference does it make? We are cowardly going about a situation that we'll eventually have to confront in the near future. It's strategic to go now, while we are the most powerful. To wait, has grave consequences.
@@avafury4584 America and her allies would leave Russia looking like an ashtray , Putin better not push them too far , would be advised to shut his crap mouth , before he gets his country turned into a giant car park 🚙
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
There is much more out there that we know nothing about, and will never know about until the day they use them! Pray that day never has to come!!!
I hope we have really fantastic interceptors too.
I really don’t think we have shit on Russia. I pray to 🙏GOD🙏 I’m wrong!!! And if we have good interception technology, we don’t have enough.
@@creescrazylife901 you dont have to worry about Russia much here at home, we have much more suffocated weaponry thank to Trump that is, only problem is having the right guy in the White House to use them without hesitating!! But I'm with u I pray we never have to find out!!🇺🇸💪💯
@@creescrazylife901 I think you may be correct. But, Russia is a poor country. Maybe they are just BSn us on the amount they have. I hope.
@@creescrazylife901 amount doesn't mean everything. It's all about how effective they are. Also, both probably have a shit ton more than what the public knows or what we 'think' we know.
In a world where sea monsters don’t exist, we built our own.
Yup...my US Navy veteran friends who served as submariners call these subs "Krakens" and for a very good reason.
Best comment I've read in awhile. Bravo!
@@imperial3469 Yes, humans tend to be rather good at that kind of thing.
My dad, as an eighteen years old sailor, served on a submarine at the BATTLE OF JUTLAND in World War One, from May 1916 to June 1916. His brother serving with the Guards Division was 'lost' fighting on the SOMME
We honour their service while we strain ourselves to find a way that overcomes war. New thinking and new faith is needed.
My father fought in Holland in WWII.
Submarine in world war 1 ?? Really ? Wow I thought submarines are started use second world war onwards . U2 boats . I never knew the submarines had a very vast history
He was a hero, we salute for the fallen of The US Army
I wrote a 16 page paper in college about the Trident submarines. This was in 2003. From what I remember each sub has the capacity to take out an entire hemisphere. I want to say each had 24 missiles with multiple warheads.
Ohio class submarines have 24 hypersonic missiles trident d5 with 8 nuclear warheads each can be sent to different target's. enough to wipe out all Russia and China. there is 18 of those subs
You're right each missle can have 10 1.5 Megatron warheads
@@ralphharper2414 actually they are 475 kilotons each and can all be sent to different target's. that's 8x24 475kiloton nuclear warheads on just one sub there are 18 of those subs. that's 3456 475kiloton nuclear warheads
enough to wipe out all of Russia and some
@@boostjunkie2320 the one we had were 1.5 Meg on trident c3 on an old Franklin class boat
@@ralphharper2414 the Trident 2 D5 holds 8 475kiloton warheads on the Ohio class submarine
It is sad that we as humans even need such a weapon
If people Stopped hating America for no reason and we’d have no reason to do this.
So it’s all the fault of every other country?
@@johnmoore9862 it's not any particular country's fault. It's humanity's fault. It's a flaw in our DNA and genetics that makes us this way
@@thepearl28. That is a much better reply than SinCity’s comment. It does seem we all have deep deep tribal attitude & are programmed to dislike others who live differently from us, & that applies to all.
Wake up. Human beings kill each other. It’s our nature.
The crews aboard those subs have nerves of steel. I can’t imagine what goes through the minds of people at stations like these in times like this.
You are right. But we do feel the nerves!
I served on a Dutch submarine. Walrus class. In a NATO exercise we attacked many ships, including sinking the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 after two attacks and we managed to sneak away. We also sank many of the Roosevelt's escorts, including the nuclear submarine USS Boise, a cruiser, several destroyers and frigates, plus the command ship USS Mount Whitney.
After many stressful hours the celebration makes it all worth it.
I served as a Missile Technician Chief on the Ohio, and 3 other smaller SSBNs. It is dedication to duty, pride and professionalism that drive us. The Ohio and her 'siblings' have been out there since the early 1980's. And yes, they could do what is said, although the men and now women would only do so on the orders from the President.
@@tomkiley6370 shipmat those of us on the floating city above admire you and appreciate you all. Anchor Up
@@GWS-schouwen I assume the Carrier and its escorts was expecting your attack and was listening for you, but failed. Reassuring for you, not so much for the sailors on the carrier.
@@minerran That's right. They knew we were out there, but didn't detect us and expect us from the direction and place we came from. I think the strength of this class, besides the fact that these subs are small and silent, that they are very good in undeep waters while American subs are good in deep waters of at least 200m/650ft.
I served on the USS Michigan SSBN 727 Blue Crew from 1987 to 1989, as a nuclear reactor operator. She was still a FBM sub back then. She was converted from an SSBN to a SSGN during her refueling overhaul at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard a few years ago. SSGNs are outstanding theater/tactical platforms; not to mention the spec ops capabilities that they now provide.
As a lifelong resident of Michigan I thank you for your service.
And your point is what?
Thank you for your service I can never express how grateful I am to you God-bless and wish you the best of luck in life
What was your rate?
@@patrickbukowski9667 ET/RO
The U.S. Navy doesn't have "A" submarine that could destroy Russia, it has 14 of them. France has another 4 such submarines, as does the U.K. The very expensive policy of nuclear deterrence through a credible committment to massive retaliation is cheaper than the conventional wars it has prevented. It's a hell of a way to keep civilizations from destroying each other, but it's the best we've come up with so far.
Russia's navy is significantly weaker no doubt. Their strength lies with their huge amount of mobile land based Topol ICBM's. Just as effective but far less expensive. Biden is very wise not giving Ukraine the capabilities to attack Russia beyond their border. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has gone poorly to say the least but they have always been willing to accept massive losses in order to achieve victory. They've already inflicted $960 billion in damage on Ukraine. It's going to be a very long winter for them. No matter how long it takes, Russia will prevail.
i may be wrong but if we're talking about Virginia class subs, the navy has 21 of them, 20 are active.
W E R U L E
God help us for that idea.
I served on the Ben Franklin, SSBN 640 (G) from 87 to 91 (part of the 41 for freedom). I went on a Trident once...amazing compared to the boat I was on
I docked and worked on the Benjamin Franklin down at KingsBay ,Georgia when I was stationed on the USS OAKRIDGE and then undocked.
Thank you for your service Sir🖖
No one asked
@@RoadRunnerProduction No one asked what?
My cousin was on the Ben Franklin about that time frame, not sure if blue or gold crew though
Bad news everyone. ANY nuclear armed submarine these days has the capacity to destroy almost any one country. Ours, theirs, anyone’s. Nice world we live in, isn’t it?
Like all defense, better to have than not to have
@@Dobrulez70 That's why those north koreans build nuke. The usa cannot push into their land without the threat
We are tired of this ...this one has this one has this one has even North Korea has ...if it is the end ww will die
I hope ETs come. I want to leave with them.
@@charleswest6372 save me seat
I was in NUCSUBLANT in the late sixties. I was assigned to the USS HUNLEY AS31. We had NUC SUBS tied along side for repairs and replenishment. These were bad ass subs.
Von Steuben (Gold) 77 - 79 refits out of Holy Loch, Scotland.. real nice place!
nucsublant??!!, that is funny, and no such thing!
Thank you for your service @ G. Howard. US Army 1977-81
Small world , was an ELT on USS LAFAYETTE gold SSBN 616 , 3 patrols out of Holy Loch . Fish and chips every other night. Pints of heavy 69 pence.
Thank you for your sacrifice
Such a awesome weapons platform, I'm happy that they're a US weapons platform and allied to the UK.
Exactly! Imagine iff russia or China had such a weapon.
@@barbaraedwards4802 They do tho, both sides would be annihilated within hours
@@Lubet0TheGreat we will see how good the Russian and Chinese subs are when the yanks knock seven bells.out of em, lol
The Trident II SLBMs actually have up to 15 MIRVs. They only carry 8 due to START treaties. Yet, if we ever used them, we certainly wouldn't be worried about treaties...
that wouldnt destroy any country.. people over estimate the blast radius of these weapons and fallot.. Its hillarious people live in the cities that were bombed by the USA in japan.. :)..it only takes a few years to recover not decades
My dad told me about Trident III when I was 6... I'm 40.
@@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yes that’s true, but that was also in 1945 with a much smaller warhead in relative terms. In the event of an all out war, you’d have hundreds (or thousands) of much more powerful nukes blowing dust and debris into the atmosphere. Nuclear winter is a real, and terrifying, outcome.
What scares me is sooner or later a technical problem could set one off, it nearly happened in the state's I believe
typhhon
U.S. keeps its cards close to it's chest, wouldn't be surprised if they have alien technology too.
Area51 👌🏻
They have.
Alien technology of flying on a broom. 😂
LOL first build hypersonic weapon, Russia is far far ahead of USA in nuclear weapons,hypersonic weapons, missiles defense system, iCBM technology, USA nuclear weapons are 15 kilo tons while Russian are 50 mega ton, Russian nuclear bombs are far far damaging than USA, and also Russian iCBMs are faster and can go longer than USA, Russia is the one who built rocket engines to usa. Your own generals said the USA have no defense against Russian hypersonic weapons. What a joke.
@@johnlopez1604 Russia's nuclear capability is ancient like the rest of it's military. That's been proved in Ukraine where they took a battering by western armaments. U.S. and Europe have a missile defense system, better intelligence, quicker response, Russia would be annihilated before it's first hypersonic intercontinental missile even enters orbit. United States will never advertise it's capabilities, like Russia, because this is a sign of fear. The two militaries are miles apart, U.S. main adversary isn't even Russia, it's China. Russia is now a bankrupt state.
I’m talking about all militaries when I say this. It is crazy, even scary amazing when you see how far mankind has come with technology in just 100 years. Maybe its just me but it seems like in the last century man has had an explosion in the tech world. And thats only considering what we know about. They are usually many decades ahead of us, the general public.The first “Powered,” flight was less than 120 years ago. 1903 to be exact. In far less than 100 years we went from flying 20 or 30 MPH to flying well past Mach 1 which is the speed of sound. Close to 750 MPH. If you want something perfected, turn it into a lethal weapon. Man will devote every dollar and every hour to making it even more deadly. I think its pretty obvious where we are headed.
You are right on the money with your comment,Thank you for your insight.
Yeh even the last 50 years unbelievable tech (mind blowing).
Sad, but true. Everything technological has changed......But WE havent.✝️
You're absolutely correct what a very intelligent man you and you are God-bless and hope all is well
We are nearing the crescendo of this , all this will culminate into either a dystopian hell on earth with AI dominating and enslaving us or wipe us out entirely.
And Jesus is coming soon :D
*Submarine that can destroy country in minutes*
Me: Ah yes, destroying Vatican seems very difficult
I told the world 🌎 that the USA doesn't have to disclosed its world power...
America just don't want war, America wants the world to be happy
@orrett - I think one needs to distinguish between the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia & the US (and the PRC too) vs. their people. The peoples of the world of course, do not want war. The Russian people certainly do not.
But the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia and the US want what is in their "interests". Its clear Putin does want war with Ukraine, and their land. Probably Transnistria & Moldova too. Maybe the Baltics. He already has Belarus, and hegemony of Kazakhstan.
But the US Permanent State too has a history of waging wars to further its "interests". --We were notorious for using force to further our economic interests in Latin America pre-WW2. And pretexts were arranged (Gulf of Tonkin, Iraqi WMD) for wars against N. Vietnam and Iraq. No elected or appointed officials were ever held accountable --- via the equivalent of a Nuremburg Tribunal for those "mistakes" -- keep in mind, 2 MM southeast Asians died from that conflict. And America just "forgets" to hold anyone accountable. ... American "mistakes" are often more bloody than Russian maliciousness.
Great, I am smiling already!
why 222 years of continuous wars then to control the world...
Although that is a fact-based statement....
The U.S. would suffer horrendous loss as well.
It would be over for both countries as well as the entire population of the Earth.
George Carlin: Earth will shake us off like a surface nuisance.
Dude, they don't have anything that can reach us and we have the ability to stop anything far from landing on our soil.
@@gpnulife that's what you think. Why do you think they rise prices here so it may go to the military. Lot the government don't want us to know.
@@gpnulife top generals in the US have stated in the event of a full exchange, MAYBE we could stop 30% of missiles, if we're lucky.
@@gpnulife The first mistake in war is under estimating your enemy. Now I don't believe the people of Russia are our enemy, but just like the USA, Russia probably has weapons not on the hooks and not known.
It's not about who can destroy each other in minutes but rather the defensive measures against it.
There is NO defense against incoming Missiles. Only 100 need to make it around the Globe 🌎 to end the human race.
13.8 billion years to get here, and this is the best we could do with the gift.
According to God's word earth has only been here bout 6000 yrs
@@JamesJustice-rs5yc
🤣
@@JamesJustice-rs5yc According to men*
In 1971 I was a B-52 pilot assigned to alert duty. Our targets (2 bombs) were near Moscow. I don’t think we would have made it to our target due to their defenses, but since our arrival would have been much later than the impact of our nuke missiles, maybe we would.
Interesting. I think you would.
50 years latee and that scream of the b52 still intimidates the world! Can't imagine what it must have been like during those really intense years when Ivan was looking very scary
@@MrNb131 Easily shot down these days though.....😕
@@earljohnson2113 yeah this ukraine war is showing that big machines can be neutralized with hand-held weapons, whole different ballgame
@@MrNb131 yep, lots n lots of simple stuff beats huge monumental stuff.
US has a Marine Corps and one Air Craft carrier that could destroy both. Neither country can win a static war against the U.S. and they knew it
The overall number of both Trident subs and their nuclear-warhead missiles initially deployed has been cut back in the last 15 or so years as the boats' missions have been modified to some beyond nuclear launch, replaced by conventional cruise missiles. Or some missile tubes have been designated as subject to modification in order to serve as 'launch' pads for SEAL-type infiltration mission teams. The fewer subs to track, the more assets adversaries like Russia/China will have to look for and perhaps find the remainder, by default. The fewer missiles available to launch, the fewer that Russian/Chinese anti-missile defenses will have to contend with. Plus, the Tridents were never intended or built as first-strike weapons against hardened land-based ICBM sites---just like their Minuteman counterparts. So in the aggregate, the original deterrent value has been reduced to an extent that it is increasingly marginal. Likely still the strongest, most capable part of the overall U.S. deterrent, but a reduction in force has not helped.
They would have a better shot at shooting down one of our B2's than an ICBM. And shooting down a B2 is damn hard. Basically it would take an extremely lucky shot.
We'd better beef em up again.
Finally, l a person that knows what is what, Hoo Ya!
For those that don't know, that is what we said in Navy Deep Sea Diver training.
@@tweekrseekr8816 I'm a muff diver. So Hoo Ya !
If I was an enemy of the United States I wouldn’t make the mistake you just made… There’s more than enough in our arsenal to kill the entire planet 20 times over no matter where the detonations actually occur, the food supply of the entire planet would be contaminated within 96 hours and won’t return to an edible state for at least 60 to 150 years… no human would survive more than a few months… I’d say we still have more than plenty if we should need them… And if ours aren’t enough the other 15,000 that would be launched in retaliation would finish the job… I’d say you are very incorrect that it’s not every bit the deterrent is very much as strong as it’s ever been… And I wouldn’t be so sure there are fewer out there, the newer physics packages are tiny, many more than you think could be lurking in few delivery packages, and let’s not kid ourselves as to the number of devices in orbit shall we… And they don’t have to destroy hardened targets my man, they just have to get within a couple hundred miles of the grain feilds, that’s how they kill!
Apparently one country has a submarine that can build a city in seconds
Scary weapon - basically one missile alone can destroy several cities.
Please don't bomb the lingerie haul girls.....😕
@@earljohnson2113
😝
Not really, it's a bit limited in how far and in which direction the warheads from the same missile can be targeted.
@@QuasiELVIS close enough for Hand grenades and horse shoes and, oh...... Nuclear Weapons...🤔
@@earljohnson2113 are you talking about china?
"“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” A. Einstein
WOW.
Nice One
He was wrong because everyone will be dead. RAD will contaminate the water and soil, crops will not grow and die and anyone that is left after the first strike will either kill themselves or die of starvation or radiation.
Yes U.S Navy has a submarine that could destroy Russia and China in minutes. But dont forget the Russian navy got a similar submarine, which carries 20 ballistic missiles of 10 nuclear warheads in each one.
Yes but made in China it'll probably be rusty by now
@@donlofting4268 I do bet you will find a lot of made in china stuff in the US submarine aswell
Nuclear fallout from even one destroyed nation would destroy this world for thousands of years or more...three would be no winner...all human life would be extinguished and any life that would possibly make it underground would live to die there in their fancy coffins.
Thank You to my fellow Sub Sailor's..
Run Silent / Run Deep !!! 🇺🇸
Regardless who has the best, if one launches its payload in anger, there wont be no families, relatives or civilisation left
How do you know ?
Because he has a brain and it's common sense...
@@Desekratedd Are you a nuclear weapons expert ?
@@cbing4036 🤣
You know if the shit did hit the fan and nukes were launched. I'm sure rich people living in there lavish shelters would still live like rats underground for awhile but after the bombs go off their supplies would eventually run out! Either way let's just hope it never happens and we don't let idiot crazy dumbasses like trump or putin kill us all!🤞
18 empty middle silos ,a mushroom cloud. And it's Miller time.
Weird that we never hear of Russia and China saying “we’ve got this! We’ve got that!”
To the point the U.S makes this stuff unclassified scares me more, I probably think they have someone in replacement or something better then the submarine mentioned in this video.
Thank you all for the service and sacrifice . You deserve this nation's admiration and gratitude for all you do !
@John Cliff lol u mean the bellarus of Putin or the israelíes immigrants/setters?! Stay home and do another job, actually u r worse, crazy Putin claims that they r defending thier borders but Bush and blair and their very well paid mercenery(paid soldiers r merceneries) traveled accross the globe for that!
Two words -
NUCLEAR WINTER
We'd better learn to Love
because no one will be left
to Hate for very long ...
God Help Us 🙏
That is why Russian wants to be left alone. But no, the US pushes nato to their boarders to encircle them, poking the bear. When they plead and plead, no response until they react. And the Commedian in Ukraine does not know he is being used. He wants nato to confront Russia on his behalf and to start nuclear war.
As someone who went thru the US Navy nuke program years ago, nothing will surprise me regarding the capability of our underwater Navy. I would not want to be the first hostile nation to test us!
😂🤣😂
@@soulabear9146 tf is funny
@@teronmillen59 Murican Arrogance 😂
@@soulabear9146 compare US Military spending to others. Maybe you can see something there.
@@auggieazure8633 US Military Industrial Complex spending all that Monopoly Money, on faster ways of Killing
The problem with Nukes is that when it happens the survivors will envy the dead
Having worked on Nuke missiles, There is never a good solution to using them. Out unit had enough warheads to destroy the east coast of the US from Canada to the coast. And that was just our unit.
Canada is a big country still no place to hide.
Wow, what if one goes off accidentally
Question, how does that firing of the weapons work? What's the process? What stops someone firing one off?
@@PHTV11 It takes multiple to fire a nuclear weapon. I won't get into details. No one person can fire a nuke.
@@slowgoat6089 It would not be a nuclear explosion. The warheads are not armed until they are launched. It takes a certain firing sequence for a nuke to go off. Otherwise, it is just the TNT that explodes. But it will leave radiation scattered about, just not the same level as a nuke detonation.
I remember desert Storm people were shocked with the weaponry that we were pulling out. Just imagine what we have today didn't even have smartphones then we were still using push button phones with cords and maybe pagers
That's why I laugh at the people who think our military is weak. Secrecy is a good thing to have. The enemy will find out what we have when we use it on them. No reason to parade your game plan for the world to see.
As the Russians has the same, named the Deadhand...but we're all dead after all missiles of both country's submarine are launched...
you are over estimating russian tech.
@@waybee100 err they just sent a rocket into space, I'm sure they could hit a target the size of murrica
@@johnfrancis2215 on a good day….lol. Which day depends on whether they remembered order the fuel delivery….lol
The US nuke takes few minutes to destroy Russia while Russia takes few seconds to destroy the US.
nobody wins
Can't still under estimate the enemy we have to assume that they can have big military capability, ,it still could be ugly a third world War
💯💯💯💯
No One wins that sir is why we have them - No one wants to kill there family Oh except evil ones , Ones who dont have a soul & It aint Russia, USA = AIPAC .
Thinking that civilization will make it to 2085 is being really optimistic.
They would have similar weapons as well, so its not any huge advantage
Thats the thing people need to absolutely understand. Nuclear holocaust is a lose/lose situation. Period.
“They” have junk
@@USAMontanan that "junk" is enough to wipe out US and make it uninhabitable for 100+ years. Search Cobalt bombs
@@thanikk990 I agree 👍
much bigger actually.
i serviced on the USS SAILFISH 1970 to 1974, HAD orders to the US JAMES MONROE, BLUE CREW, ORDERS changes went to one of the last diesel subs.
I’ve heard U.S military experts say that the U.S can’t fight Russia and China simultaneously.
Watching this clip gives us hope.
🤣🤣🤣 sure
The US could fight them both from their chairs at the super bowl........
@@harbselectronicslab3551 Hahaha
Your hope means the doom day
@@weigangfu8826 It is the dooms day the way things are heading.
We spend more on our military than the next 7 nations combined. It’s safe to say this isn’t all we have either.
3miltoiletseat
I sure hope you're right. I'm thinkin that space shuttle wasn't going up back n forth just to study bees in space...😉
@@earljohnson2113 or research on perfumes
If it makes you feel better, we spend nearly six times as much on healthcare. If we could cut that in half we could double our military spend AND pay off a $1 trillion in debt a year.
@@masterchinese28 I know
I was stationed in Norfolk when one of the Ohio's came in for SSGN refit. The awesome thing was I got to reunite and serve with two of my bootcamp buddies during this time while also being present for one of them becoming a father. That was a great day I remember my chief of the sonar division on USS SSN NewPort News 688 telling me I had a priority duty to get my ass to the base hospital. That was a mildly stressful but great day.
Yea… it’s chilling to think it’s actually possible in this day and age. Pray for peace and be kinder to one another.
Back when Robert Oppenheimer developed the A Bomb to what happened in the 40s to the tech of the power of the weapons we have today is unimaginable. Hope that day never comes !
Oh but it will. Bible Prophecies must be fulfilled. Christ and the Angels (aliens) will save our hide though.
Nah, the weapons today aren't as powerful as those from the 50's and 60's but still devastating.
@@Alps6408 I beg to differ.
One-hundred-ninety-eight warheads from a single Trident submarine can take out 24 cities? I heard that the fireball alone on a 500 kiloton weapon would be as big as Manhattan. That leads me to believe that a single Trident can take out more than 24 cities.
They target cities with multiple warheads, to account for possible "duds" or targeting errors. And I think you may be confusing the effects of a multi-megaton warhead. You don't get into TRUE city killing warheads until you are in the 2-3 megaton range. Which are about as big as we (the US) have. We definitely have the know how to create multi hundred megaton warheads, but the effects of one that large are unknown, largest ever detonated was the "Tsar Bomba" at approx 50 megaton.
Triple the number and 2/3rds of those warheads will destroy much of the USA.
Yes, I guess it's true that a single Trident can destroy only 24 cities. My thinking was wrong. But 24 cities would be over half the population of virtually all the countries in the world. Pretty gruesome stuff. I think we can reduce nuclear arsenals world wide.
28 cities to be exact
@SMAC_SOLDIER2102 -_- yeah they only have 3 of those while US have 14 multiple it or divide doesn't matter US has more nuclear warheads
Spend trillion$$$ to blow up the World. Great job fellas !
Yes and I betcha more than one.
These are really inexpensive submarines. At 6:58, the video reports that they cost "4 dollars minus $6 billion to manufacture". That is one cheap nuclear powered submarine. I will pay $4 dollars for one please.
They deliver your sub and owe you $5,999,999,996.00 USD. That's a great deal!
23 knots underwater is fast!
Quiet while doing so is more to the point.
I believe the Chinese and Russia think the U.S. does not have the stomach for a conflict.Just as Japan thought in WWII
Drop nuclear bombs on civilians knowing that there will be no response, as is the American way. But Russia and China are not Japan in 1945. Russia has more nuclear weapons than the US.
Russia propaganda that's all
@@andreyg.2388 Russia being broke?
@@speedmaster001 Such unsmart question... Read more macroeconomics, I'm not gonna teach you.
@@andreyg.2388 Dude 760 Bilion$ vs 56 Bilion$ Defense system make a lot of diference 🥲
Not England - the United Kingdom. The UK's nuke subs aren't even based in England. They are based in Scotland.
There was a History teacher in a foreigner video saying that Putin took his wife and family to a special place in Siberia in a special underground, subterrenean place. Let's assume if it's true, then it's very serious, why he would do that, is he planning or expecting a nuclear or something similar to happen?
yea what would he come out to.
Hitler blew his head off in an underground bunker, probably Putin will too, 10,000,000 USD bounty for him for crimes against humanity.
@@davidhynes what about American crimes against humanity, Syrria Iraq to name just 2, American ordinance is enabling you're freinds the Saudis to kill 330 000 civilians including children in the Yemen, much hypocrisy
There it is…” deter a first strike by any SANE. adversary”. We all know that “sane adversaries “ are mythical creatures.
Russia, China, and even North Korea also have the nuclear ability to destroy the United States. Thus the hope that the reality of mutually assured destruction will prevent a nuclear attack by any one, or combination, of countries. Unfortunately, some of these world leaders don’t appear to be mentally stable, and that is scary.
You sure? Unless Isreal and North Korea have secret nuclear weapons they do not have enough to wipe out the US landmass.
@@ajcso7844 The radiation cloud, that develops after the explosion, would be spread by the wind. The radiation alone could potentially kill millions of people and make vast areas of land uninhabitable. According to scientific analysis that I’ve seen on TH-cam. In any event the enormous devastation from the initial detonation and the spreading radiation poising would make survival unlikely for millions of people.
The infrastructure would be destroyed by the explosion and the ability to get food, water, and medical treatment would be extremely difficult at the very least. It might be a blessing to die in the initial explosion rather than experiencing a slow and painful death in the aftermath, IMO.
@@larrys9879 Oh wait nvrm I misread the information. The estimate could go up to 100.
That won't stop any of the people you just mentioned. They are not stupid but they are mentally unstable and want to rule the world.
I remember a quote some where between the POTUS and the USSR General Secretary from the cold war:
"I can destroy you a thousand times over. Yes Mr. President, but I only need to destroy you once."
Likewise.
Wait, that was a very calculating statement. Including MIRV, 192 nuclear warhead missiles from one Ohio class nuclear submarine can wipe out 24 cities he said ? Each of these missiles can carry a 8 Thermo nuclear warheads at 450 kt each. Let’s not forget this hydrogen nuclear bomb is more powerful than an atomic bomb. H bomb Is more powerful than A bomb. The 15 kt A bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. One of the eight MIRV’ed warheads is many times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb.
A 450 kt Thermo nuclear hydrogen bomb, 192 of them, From one Ohio class nuclear powered submarine, out of 14 such Subs, would seem to destroy far more than 24 cities, unless the goal is to crater each of the 24 cities including its suburbs and downtown 1 mile deep into utter Nuclear oblivion overkill.
We do need some new fishin holes. We could use them if we survive in about 1000 years.
I'm just glad they belong to us...
You are probably correct.
I had 425 KT for each nuke (28 Hiroshimas)
450 KT is 30 Hiroshimas.
7 Hiroshimas is "only" 105 KT.
Stop you're making my freedom grow!
It's gonna happen someday anyway....let's hit him at his weakest and then China too before they get even more powerful with the help of our greedy corporations...😉 Let's roll. Ps....build your fall out shelter.
I m glad that Albania 🇦🇱 is on USA 🇺🇸 side
🇺🇸❤️🇦🇱
Albanian USA the best.👍.
The real matatan.🤔.
Yeah. That's great to know the US will use you as cannon fodder.
No doubt of certain coastline all around the world their are submarines sat with enough nuclear weaponry that would make Armageddon look like just a hot afternoon... 🔥 🥵
This meme sounds pretty useful right about now:
Do it! Just do it! What are you waiting for, just do it!
The UK have 4 of there own subs with trident missiles armed with nukes giving nato 18 in total. Powerful stuff
Forgot about the nukes bro say smthng to russia now boy
@@FFNeptune what do you expect me to say to the Russians or more to the point the Russian milary. They have embarrassed themselves enough so I will abstain
@@scottaubrey9046 ye conquering Ukraine is embarrassing nice and Biden going Iranian instead of Ukrainian
@@FFNeptune but my Russian friend Russia is not conquering Ukraine, it has just had it's arse handed to itself in the North and is struggling to hell in the south and that's without mentioning it's flagship has been sunk. That victory parade in May is going to one hell of a job to pull off that's for sure
@@scottaubrey9046 flagship sunk n everything still ? Wht u gonna do the fight is on and russia is winning and ye russia is using a very less amount of military power in Ukraine and we r also selling oil to our allies like India so don't worry ukraine gonna go down and u guys provoked russia to do it
God Bless USA 🇺🇸 🙏
The Russians also have their own Typhoons too!!!
junk
@@KepperKleen Donkey Face AOC HERE!
An ICBM is armed with multiple nuclear warheads. These are in the nose of the missile and they are contained within re-entry vehicles. So, if a submarine has 18 nuclear ICBM's and each ICBM has a dozen, or so warheads, one nuclear submarine is able to target well over 200 locations. These submarines are doomsday machines.
Most likely Russia and China have the equivalent setting off our shores as we admire our own.
so? They couldnt find ours and we shoot back....game over.
I wonder if you have considered underwater mines or torpedos that have their own tracking capabilities
Nuke torpedoes that travel at 300 MPH ? Yep they are out there .
Oh no nothing we never considered that. Back to the drawing board. What a joke
How about a mine or torpedo that can wait and only attack a predetermined target…scary hey
Dont be fooled Russia has some powerful Weapons
Satellite cameras have become so powerful and coverage so extensive tracking them threw acoustic "ping" has become irrelevant .
While Russia signed a decree to use nuclear bomb if necessary, USA may need congressional approval to do so or even start a war. Russia also have several nuclear submarines seating next to USA coast, as you "destroy Russia" in a minute, Russia can do same away from home. USA understand the consiquences of a nuclear war with Russia.
The Russian army has proven ro be incompetent and their sub would probably end up blowing its self up if it was ever used
Yes, but doesn’t work that way. Approval can be retrospective. Executive order can approve the order to launch depending on circumstance. US has a no first strike policy, not a no instant retaliatory response. Russia MUST know that MAD applies just as much today as it did in October 1962
Russia have more Nuclear warheads ,,incase of an attack its who fires fast without esitation because they are massive destruction with no winners ,,but all that matters is who fires fast for more accuracy
@@boxing.ascetic I remember the cold war ,,SOVIET UNION KGB was mostly ahead of the Americans
proof of a troll is found in the randomly generated username, comrade.@@Gerald-i7j9i
A Doomsday beast. But needed to keep the wolves from our doorsteps. Go Navy.
Such a boomer comment.
It’s all fun and games until Russia or the Chinese destroy the satellites that control said missiles, then they just become fishing boats.
The nukes aren't guided by satellites. They used the fixed position of the moon and the stars to locate their targets. Its a brilliant computer based concept...read up on it...
*Excellent sudmarine*
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV, Jesus Christ is the only way.
Amen
As the U.S. have Allies now closer to the Russian and Chinese border,along with advancements in ICBM capabilities and programing ,a reduction in Naval Nuclear dispersion is not really a loss.Once it starts, frankly there will be little left.
Ohio class is 3rd gen SSBN subs, Russia already have 4th gen SSBN subs.
As the U.S. have Allies now closer to the Russian and Chinese border,along with advancements in ICBM capabilities and programing so you admit that you are bullying other? once the war start there is no winner.
Hypersonic warheads already in cuba. Washington wants to turn itself into dust. As you wish..
And Russia lol I’d say we will all die no winners and if it means Russia pushes it first to us to send them back I’d say good riddance to putin
@@andreyg.2388 Russian has many of the stealthiest submarines ( Typhoon class and the Sierra class Kilo class,,Akula class )
If this OHIO class submarne posses that kind of destructive power, then it's good to create more of its kind .
For what? Fanatix
@@danilo16410 To prevent a Nuclear War.
@@madrecka I'm not sure that things are as they are presented to us "expendables."
They cost a lot of money
the next class of nuclear submarine (Columbia) will be available by 2030 and will carry even more powerful armaments
This is a very good thing to have because it keeps the enemies wondering where the hell it's at.
Can Montana Class
Battleships finally get Built ?
Fit Them with
Missile Launchers
As well as with the
18 Inch Guns.
Their Armor Belts
Would be Great
Against Missile
Attacks
sorry, it would still be a giant floating target, and technology would defeat their "belt", but nice try.
@@patrickbukowski9667 Can they be fitted with Anti Aircraft & Anti Missile Defenses .
Also replacing two of the Main Turrets with Missile Launchers
Would make a huge difference.
@@DavidWilliams-el4zt it can still be seen and heard. We could track a ship, tell you what type, how many screws how many blades per screw, how fast they were turning, what heading they were on. Then sink them with a couple torpedoes.
@@DavidWilliams-el4zt They can and our work with laser defense has come quick lately. Once this is perfected hypersonic is obsolete for ship killing. There will always be more advanced ships and defense just as other tech advances
@@josifish4 make the rail gun work. They will get it right eventually and hypersonic won’t matter against plasma
Are we to assume that Russia and China don't have the same thing🤔
Actually they have better and more advanced weapons than us and nato these countries have things circling while we sleep
I thought the same , but only for Russia that have more advanced technology
@@hirdleyreid5796 what ?? By treaty USA and Russia has around 5000 nuclear warheads, China 400, France and UK around 200 each. US Defense budget 1.1 trillion $, Russia 48 billion $, China 209 billion $
@@hirdleyreid5796 yeah truly,
either our government is bluffing, or is as dumb as people in hell
@@ulrichkristensen4087 US Defense budget is NOT 1.1 trillion $ and you should not calculate Russia's and China's budgets in US dollars they are not buying their subs in US...
Couldn’t you imagine an ancient times if there were ancient aliens that have submarines and the native people see the submarine when they didn’t have metal they would think that was some kind of sea monster is crazy huh
Thankful.for Trident subs They kept.our enemies from nuke war And still do.!
we have had missile subs capable of destroying country's since the late 50s, i served on one built in the 60s. this is not new. better subs these days but the ability to destroy is old
England does not have these weapons. The United Kingdom does.
England has in fact
True
The UK subs uses the same Trident 2 ICBM as the US.
@@Crashed131963 so they can not fire without GPS lol they are duds
If you listen to me commentary it states England has these weapons. There is no English navy, army or airforce. They are part of the United Kingdom with the submarine base located in Scotland.
@@ianurquhart9379 The good news is if you have subs with Trident 2s your country is off the "Country To Invade List".
Taiwan and Ukraine need a few Boomers out there lurking around in the depths.
Then see if China or Russia drops in.
US soil have much more weakspots than Russia: US have 84 NPP which are good targets beside Yellowstone.
This submarine would destroy Russia to dust Russia not the only ones have nukes few NATO country’s have them to Russia will still die
@@klintmeyer9845 Shure dude 10k warheads are few.
This is what helps me sleep at night😂🇺🇸☕️
Like nothing else, these U-boats give peace of mind to me. I hope we can stay ahead of Communist and Arab technology in submarine stealth and missile tech. God bless you U.S. Navy submariners. 💛🙏🏽
The US should know. It is the only country which has used nuclear weapons on civilians. Not to mention industrial scale chemical weapons on civilians. Not to mention development of Biological weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine. What a great country!
Where did it use chemical weapons ?
@@earljohnson2113 Agent Orange in Vietnam as well as in Laos and Cambodia
@@LazerNR Oh yeah,but that was for foliage. To. Kill trees not humans. I was there.
@@earljohnson2113 yeah well its caused tons of damage to humans and birth defects in humans.. Among the Vietnamese, exposure to Agent Orange is considered to be the cause of an abnormally high incidence of miscarriages, skin diseases, cancers, birth defects, and congenital malformations (often extreme and grotesque) dating from the 1970s.
I feel more safe with the U.S. as or most important ally. Thank you!🇳🇱🇳🇱
Why don’t they use it if they destroy there’s nothing to worry about.
Even if you surprise the US with a first strike, those subs are there to make sure you pay the price.
the Russian And Chinese navies far outnumber what the US have in nuclear armed Subs ..
Nothing amazing comparing to Russian submarines.
You're joking right? HA HA
@@goblin103187 No I am not.
What difference does it make? We are cowardly going about a situation that we'll eventually have to confront in the near future. It's strategic to go now, while we are the most powerful. To wait, has grave consequences.
Do you have a deathwish?
Wow!
Realy I like this powerful nuclear submarines
Russia has more than 50 nuclear submarines, each one of them can destroy the US and UK in seconds,
and they are almost ready to use them..
If they are as good as their tanks , they will finish in scrapyards 💥
@@fraclarke6523 not before turning hundreds of American cities into scrap yards
@@fraclarke6523 T-90M is as good as the Abrams and the T-14 Armata double as good as the Yankee piece of junk!
@@avafury4584 America and her allies would leave Russia looking like an ashtray , Putin better not push them too far , would be advised to shut his crap mouth , before he gets his country turned into a giant car park 🚙
Dont the enemy have anti ballistic missiles as well? Russians have their A-135, but idk about the Chinese.
The chinese communist party has Type 096….pretty much the same capabilities that the US and russians have.
@@deplorablefederalist7908 John is not talking about subs, read carefully.
The US navy has nucler submarine that collide with under-sea mountain. It is almost blind submarine.
Cool, then we all die together right after the responses...
Lmao, Russia and China have subs that could also do the same. The video title is just ridiculous
Russia yes China no
@@patrickshtf3165 China yes, remember the hypersonic shi which scare the shit out of pentagon😅