Kerbal Space Program! | Worlds Fastest Plane Challenge! (4,520+ MPH)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
  • "FEEL THE SPEED!"
    Today I'm taking on a challenge again based around planes and as I've seen people attempt land speed records on this game before, I thought I would take on a arguably a harder challenge of creating a jet capable of going faster than the fastest manned aircraft currently in existence "NASA' X-15" Which achieved a speed of 4,520 MPH or in Kerbal speak F***ing fast.
    Mods Used:
    1. OPT Space Plane Parts - goo.gl/VRyAxN
    2. KAX - goo.gl/z1ncgW
    Hope you enjoy!
    Stay Tuned Stay Awesome (o)

ความคิดเห็น • 2.3K

  • @TheDaveNY
    @TheDaveNY 5 ปีที่แล้ว +487

    I love how he completely disregards vertical stabilizers, but wonders why the craft flips around.. This is just hilarious!

  • @mashiroikaze
    @mashiroikaze 8 ปีที่แล้ว +584

    17:10 "How did NASA do it?!" Simple - they used the infinite fuel and no damage options from the debug menu. :D

    • @bagusariiq
      @bagusariiq 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sierra Whiskey lol

    • @KerbalChris
      @KerbalChris 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      NASA brought it high up with a plane and then released it
      I know it’s a joke tho
      Edit: read the read more section guys *oof*

    • @balthazarnaylor5874
      @balthazarnaylor5874 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      god damn it kerbal Chris

    • @andreydas2153
      @andreydas2153 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KerbalChris r/woooosh

    • @solt4r1
      @solt4r1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      traxxas raptor and gamerzando21
      This is not reddit...

  • @TonyZumpano
    @TonyZumpano 5 ปีที่แล้ว +891

    You don't need more oxidizer you need A I R I N T A K E S!!!!!!

    • @CaptainJohn
      @CaptainJohn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Nathan plays 445
      Lol. The real X-15 didn’t have any so he probably went off that

    • @rakaross186
      @rakaross186 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      air doesn't work higher up in the atmosphere

    • @josemabravob
      @josemabravob 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Officer Jaco, yes it does, I think you refere to, *o x i g e n*

    • @lachlanharvey5245
      @lachlanharvey5245 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@josemabravob oxygen.

    • @calebandrew7661
      @calebandrew7661 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@josemabravob idiot
      youre stupid

  • @jackthethinker
    @jackthethinker 5 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    16:57 Emmet Brown:WE ARE GOING BACK! BACK TO THE FUTURE!!!! **plane goes over 88 miles per hour**

    • @bubski6981
      @bubski6981 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Whats wrong jeb, CHICKEN?

    • @Techno2308
      @Techno2308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      WHEN THIS PLANE HITS 88 MPH…

  • @jblue1018
    @jblue1018 5 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    HalfEYEProduction: "I'm just going to ignore physics"
    Phyisists: :/

    • @ArsenalTheProtogen
      @ArsenalTheProtogen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jake Blue Physics: Am I a joke to you?

    • @jblue1018
      @jblue1018 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArsenalTheProtogen I mean, when you don't take physics seriously, I cringe sooo.... I friggn have Robert Goddard as my profile pic, that's how much I care about physics. Why the crap am I stll typing....

    • @trashtalk4443
      @trashtalk4443 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Physicists hate him

    • @captainwhalee
      @captainwhalee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Physics: Am I a joke to u

  • @kewld00d93
    @kewld00d93 8 ปีที่แล้ว +429

    You probably didn't notice that you can reach over 1000m/s in low kerbin atmosphere with just the stock jets.

    • @DieSkinlosen
      @DieSkinlosen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      you can go faster til the moment you explode

    • @andrewm1058
      @andrewm1058 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +DieSkinLosen I'ce got planes that can go to about 1300 then they blow up

    • @DieSkinlosen
      @DieSkinlosen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      in high atmosphere you can reach 2000ms

    • @DieSkinlosen
      @DieSkinlosen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      stock

    • @grecogaming8052
      @grecogaming8052 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Andrew M nice I was only able to get to 1200 in low atmosphere

  • @dartonal9490
    @dartonal9490 8 ปีที่แล้ว +405

    Nasa didn't turn off max tempeature

  • @percival5771
    @percival5771 8 ปีที่แล้ว +341

    oxidizer you need ehhh?
    air intakes is what you need

    • @jozopako
      @jozopako 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oxidizer is air too

    • @percival5771
      @percival5771 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i know

    • @jozopako
      @jozopako 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +ThePsychoGamer that what are you wrote, it sounds like he does not need oxidizer but air intakes.

    • @percival5771
      @percival5771 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      tbh it does but meh

    • @MrMaximus366
      @MrMaximus366 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ummm you obviously dont know what oxidizer does. The fact that oxidizer is even present means that he doesnt need air intakes. Think of it this way in space the space shuttle carries oxidizer and liquid fuel. The oxidizer acts as the air hence without oxygen engines dont work so when theres oxidizer he doesnt need air intakes for air.

  • @MCPilot1201
    @MCPilot1201 5 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    The engines you used have more power in air-breathing mode. You were using oxidiser because you had no intakes and they switched automatically

  • @ireneperez9794
    @ireneperez9794 7 ปีที่แล้ว +415

    Try to do this challange agian but go Faster with STOCK parts :)

    • @ryanmcentire5704
      @ryanmcentire5704 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Irene Perez its easy to go faster with stock parts. Way easier.

    • @sireanthony1793
      @sireanthony1793 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Irene Perez 2 ramjets and it went mach4 once it reached island airfield

    • @gareth1789
      @gareth1789 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Irene Perez gg

    • @josukehigashikita4604
      @josukehigashikita4604 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Is nobody gonna correct Irene that they put agian instead of again

    • @lj2811
      @lj2811 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rapiers alone can get you to almost orbital velocity in upper atmosphere

  • @dreamcyberium
    @dreamcyberium 8 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    The X-15 didn't use air breathing engines, it used a closed cycle. You're looking for the SR 71 Blackbird... although that only reached Mach 3.5. Still very fast, however.
    You may as well just be building a rocket if you're going for closed cycle.

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +Sebastian “Fatal Gravity” Roll You can argue that both ways though because this is TH-cam after all and if I tried to beat the Blackbird and successfully did so but didn't beat the X-15 someone would point it out, because it is known to be the fastest manned plane "Rocket plane" to be exact ;)

    • @dreamcyberium
      @dreamcyberium 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      HalfEYEProduction Very true! This doesn't go without saying that I did enjoy the video at least. I really liked it. :> My comment was not at all meant as a put down.

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm sure it wasn't as I did put a ";)" at the end.
      Glad you enjoyed the video however always glad to hear stuff like that :)

    • @mettsenator6007
      @mettsenator6007 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Also the x15 was launched from a b52 mid flight so it was already in the air and moving

    • @dreamcyberium
      @dreamcyberium 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      mettsenator Yes, but the X-15 itself was jet assisted. The X-15 did not carry itself up to high altitude. :P I am aware of that.

  • @DG121480
    @DG121480 8 ปีที่แล้ว +381

    A minimum understanding of physics and aerodynamics would probably help. Just sayin.

  • @alanwatts8239
    @alanwatts8239 5 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    No vertical stabilizer wings?
    ?
    ?
    ?
    ????

    • @annymous-bz2xx
      @annymous-bz2xx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gabriel very small ones

    • @karaokeweallneed7845
      @karaokeweallneed7845 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@annymous-bz2xx but they don't have yaw control it pissed me off so much

    • @theultimatejeffry6917
      @theultimatejeffry6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The X15 didn't even take off. It was sent to 400,000 feet by other aircrafts. And it would simply glide down to earth. It was a research plane with absolutely no travel or flight path.

    • @korbetthein3072
      @korbetthein3072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THE ULTIMATE JEFFRY
      You mean 40,000 feet.

    • @theultimatejeffry6917
      @theultimatejeffry6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@korbetthein3072 What? It flew at the edge of space at 400,000 feet. It would occasionally dip into space. Thus, pilots who flew were rewarded as astronauts.

  • @austincochran6942
    @austincochran6942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    5 years….Miss you man, i remember watching this when it came out.

  • @astrangeryouvemetontheinte8546
    @astrangeryouvemetontheinte8546 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    HEP:I wanna turn
    KSP:I'm gonna end this whole mans career

  • @Ajaxburger
    @Ajaxburger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    the thing about the X15 is that I believe it was launched from a B52. you should try a launch like this.

    • @limesheep1402
      @limesheep1402 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AJAXBURGER it was

    • @phantomSB1000
      @phantomSB1000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was launched from the under side of the right wing on the B52.....i think,so you’re correct.

  • @_skykix
    @_skykix 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Wtf might as well use a fkin warp drive if you're going to use that sht. Where's the challenge if you're not even using stocks?

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +JeRic There has been many things in this video I been accused of doing wrong and I haven't denied any of them. All I can say is if you don't like the way I want to experience KSP then don't watch, considering almost all my KSP videos have included mods to some degree you won't enjoy them.
      I just find the game more enjoyable with more parts which are only obtainable by mods the "OP" factor is out of my control.

    • @_skykix
      @_skykix 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      HalfEYEProduction The title just bothers me thats all friend! It's not a "challenge" when you bring in non-vanilla parts cuz it can be modified. Plus I love LOVE mods for ksp its ashamed that its not on x64 (can't wait for 1.1).

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +JeRic The title is there to merely sum up the point of the video in a few words, having "Challenge" in the title is still valid as challenge means "A task that tests someones abilities" Which for me as someone still learning this game is still true regardless of the mods. That's like saying a video with "Funny Moments" in the title bothers you because you didn't find the video funny. It's to sum up everything generally not to individually cater to someone specifically.
      I don't mean any of this as a Put Down at all that's not my intention. I understand that you as someone who may understand this game wouldn't find this a challenge especially with mods but for me that's a different story :P

    • @TheRealToaster2
      @TheRealToaster2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +JeRic Don't play on x64.

    • @PFDominique
      @PFDominique 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HalfEYEProduction It's not the same thing because people actually look for "challenge" videos that have constraints. That's why the Challenge titles are misleading.

  • @CoffeeKnife
    @CoffeeKnife 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The stratosphere is literally a section of the atmosphere.

  • @Viper00900
    @Viper00900 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I realize I'm late, but do this again without the cheats, also like everyone else, air-intakes would probably help a lot.

  • @Andrew-hp1yj
    @Andrew-hp1yj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    69,999 is still in the atmosphere. In KSP at least.

  • @youraveragegamercan
    @youraveragegamercan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    i don't wanna be "that guy", but you don't really know much about what you're talking about

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      +YourAverageGamer Canada Nope and I'll never consider myself the brains of this game as I've chosen not to. I've said it many times, I don't claim to know what I'm doing. If I knew what I was doing I would instantly shutdown some of the ideas for challenges I've got simply because I would already have an understanding as to whether or not it was going to work to some degree, making the game stale and repetitive for me in the process.

    • @LillianWinterAnimations
      @LillianWinterAnimations 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed. I should've noticed when they used miles per hour.

    • @yungdomino4718
      @yungdomino4718 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Alexis Finch he uses both

    • @bagelgeuse5736
      @bagelgeuse5736 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      He's such an idiot

    • @alexandrecarrion5292
      @alexandrecarrion5292 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Salamence he’s not trying to appear smart. He’s trying to have fun you oaf

  • @rapid_
    @rapid_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    12:13 OUCH!! THAT KERBAL GOT RUN OVER 😂😂😂

    • @12344tom
      @12344tom 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was just a young kerbal.

    • @oh_heckk1766
      @oh_heckk1766 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Brother?

  • @plutaoopequenoplaneta1428
    @plutaoopequenoplaneta1428 8 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    New Challenge:
    MAKE A ORBITAL LAUNCHED MISSILE!

  • @Scarybull09
    @Scarybull09 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    TH-cam: let’s recommend this video that was made 4 years ago!

    • @kinley8142
      @kinley8142 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Indeed. They did recommend a video that was made 4 years ago.

    • @sxm209ytz9
      @sxm209ytz9 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ye

    • @sxm209ytz9
      @sxm209ytz9 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kinley8142 yeah

    • @arip6424
      @arip6424 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @devans.5324
      @devans.5324 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      E

  • @pineapplejuice1109
    @pineapplejuice1109 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The x-15 was A FRIKIN ROCKET PLANE it didn't have jet engines

    • @eliotaust4051
      @eliotaust4051 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Cristian Roth An airplane is defined as the following: An airplane or aeroplane is a powered, fixed-wing aircraft that is propelled forward by thrust from a jet engine, propeller or rocket engine.
      Also. It was t the fastest manned object. That award goes to the Apollo 10 capsule which reached 11082 ms.

    • @HadienReiRick
      @HadienReiRick 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eliotaust4051 TIL fighter jets technically shoot mini-airplanes.
      And to be clear, the X-15 was the fastest manned object by self-propulsion. Gravity is not considered self-propulsion under the category they're talking about, but technically what you said is correct.

  • @colewood2060
    @colewood2060 8 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    you need vertical stabilizers Soo your plane jet thing won't slide out and spin

    • @Shloomy_Shloms
      @Shloomy_Shloms 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly!!!

    • @M16A4ification
      @M16A4ification 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      you're so good at aerodynamics teach me!(how to douggie)

    • @M3VIPER
      @M3VIPER 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or SAS

    • @Chevsilverado
      @Chevsilverado 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Also, the fuel being used changes the cg. You can fix that if you use a lot of fuel hoses.

    • @whenwhen2284
      @whenwhen2284 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cole Wood well he did it anyway

  • @americano2424
    @americano2424 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The fastest Plane/Aircraft is the HTV-2 reaching a impossible speed for KSP of 13,201 Mp/h (21,000 km/h).

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Jack Howle Yeah I saw that when searching for the X-15. It's insane o.0 but I head it exploded in mid air :(

    • @davidstephens962
      @davidstephens962 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HalfEYEProduction make a sr71

    • @felix_ferdinand
      @felix_ferdinand 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jacksepticeye has made plane that flyes 1000 m/s. It's so fast that ih started to burn

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      David Stephens It's on the list for an upcoming challenge :P

    • @felix_ferdinand
      @felix_ferdinand 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HalfEYEProduction ok good to know

  • @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354
    @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The nostalgia is real. I used to watch this video over and over again. And now its 4 year later. I miss it.

  • @Choschnebab
    @Choschnebab 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    “Now we’re out” still glowing red hot due to atmosphere...

  • @heathjake25
    @heathjake25 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It helps to understand engines and physics more when building a plane...
    Higher = faster but also = more intakes and u have none.

    • @ethanjeffries7914
      @ethanjeffries7914 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He doesn't need intakes for that "jet" as it used rockets not jet engines. That's why he had a problem with oxidiser.

    • @Wombattlr
      @Wombattlr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ethanjeffries7914 those engines are more powerful in air breathing mode

    • @ethanjeffries7914
      @ethanjeffries7914 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Wombattlr well I've only just played stock KSP so how am I supposed to know how powerful the engine is?

    • @Wombattlr
      @Wombattlr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ethanjeffries7914I only play stock, but it would make sense

    • @ethanjeffries7914
      @ethanjeffries7914 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Wombattlr well I don't think it's more powerful in air breathing mode I think it's more fule efficient like the rapier.

  • @poweringmanipulation6333
    @poweringmanipulation6333 8 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Also NASA had special materials that were extra heat resitant.

    • @tuluppampam
      @tuluppampam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NASA did things after planning

  • @michaelbond569
    @michaelbond569 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You should try this again using only the bottom part of the scaffolding to make the separation easier. Then make the fuselage so that all the tanks have oxidizer in them, then line the bottom of the aircraft with heat shields, turn off ignore max temp, and start off just inside the atmosphere to see how fast it will go without cheats. Then turn on cheats just to see how fast it can really go, including infinite fuel. And the entire time staying in line with the runway and attempt a landing

  • @bobnub8194
    @bobnub8194 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Try beating the 17500 mph acheived by the space shuttle columbia during reentry.

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Bob Nub We'll see about it :)
      Cheers for the suggestion!

    • @bobnub8194
      @bobnub8194 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      HalfEYEProduction Thanks for responding!!!

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Bob Nub NP dude =D

    • @woodencart3662
      @woodencart3662 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol just go in orbit and go just below 70 km

    • @hickokdamien2309
      @hickokdamien2309 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rip Columbia crew

  • @thanos9537
    @thanos9537 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I found a thing with the wings
    The auroplane tail wings (or whatever they are called) seem to boost your planes speed when the control surface side is rotated to be against or slightly pointing outwards of your plane's body.
    BUT, this may only work when you use space plane tail wings for the main wings

  • @GardenRyb
    @GardenRyb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    at this point im rewatching old videos to revist this channel

  • @burkebacar
    @burkebacar 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Just go into an almost vertical dive from really high up.

    • @FredomHack
      @FredomHack 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      terminal velocity ffs.

    • @reidjordan4545
      @reidjordan4545 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FredomHack he’s not saying without using engines lol

    • @RealistDryad
      @RealistDryad 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Gravity is your friend"

    • @brandonhelliker
      @brandonhelliker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      FredomHack he will go faster than terminal velocity with the engines on

  • @looped_z
    @looped_z 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    it didnt explode, it went “back to the future” 16:58

  • @grandadmiralthrawn7457
    @grandadmiralthrawn7457 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    SR-71 Blackbird

  • @LordOfAlwar
    @LordOfAlwar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's called stalling. It happens when an aircraft gets so high, the atmosphere is thin enough it doesn't catch enough air to keep flying. I recommend fly lower, of fly faster.

  • @thatoneguymccool1469
    @thatoneguymccool1469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember I once calculated the speed to reach orbital velocity on kerbin, aka negate gravity in the atmosphere, but after several attempts I realized even if I could ever reach that speed, my aircraft would disintegrate. But it’s an interesting challenge if anyone wants to try, tho I do believe it was around 19k mph

    • @bogdand7138
      @bogdand7138 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      imagine being around 50 meters from the ground but still being in orbit. you might crash in a mountain doe :/

  • @KalijahAnderson
    @KalijahAnderson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's not thrust to weight ratio that you need. It's thrust to drag ratio that you need when doing aircraft. Use the oxygen in the air with an air intake instead.

  • @frfrcuh5896
    @frfrcuh5896 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Apparently everyone here is an astrophysicist. Yes, he is being reckless and doesn’t have the best understanding of physics but he is just trying to have fun. Stop acting like you are an expert in aerospace engineering.

    • @joecusack5437
      @joecusack5437 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're not, they just have an understanding in how he game works.

  • @robertmoore6298
    @robertmoore6298 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "OOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo"
    8:54 "Oh I'm a penis" XD man you're great

  • @ZeldaACFan17
    @ZeldaACFan17 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6:51 That grunt though... lol

  • @isaks3243
    @isaks3243 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I held a cruise speed of 1400-1450 ms around kerbin in my black bird replica and it just managed to circle the entire planet.
    I ran out of fuel when entering the land mass west of the mountain range that is located west of the space center, and it looked amazing doing it.

  • @no_name2882
    @no_name2882 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The more engines you have the more weight you have wich means you need more thrust to push the weight wich is why you need as little weight and high thrust as possible. More engines = more weight wich you have to push
    Btw that is actual science or rocket science

    • @poloniumperil3015
      @poloniumperil3015 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      NASCAR - RACING well I know you liked your own comment but it’s ok I do it too

  • @pakratmiz4487
    @pakratmiz4487 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jesus Christ, 2 kilometers a second???

  • @lolykebrtwv
    @lolykebrtwv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    @3:32 initial D car in the background

  • @unimatrix501
    @unimatrix501 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So funny i thought you had it at 19:39 you then go to turn the engines off and the plane explodes! Classic! so funny!

  • @michamus
    @michamus 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Says: "I'm considering at this blue zone, this is now out of the atmosphere" as his plane is still overheating from high-speed atmospheric pressure.

  • @konstantinospantelides5904
    @konstantinospantelides5904 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I LOVE THIS SERIES

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Happy you're enjoying it, cheers! =D

    • @Mnvu7124
      @Mnvu7124 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      HalfEYEProduction LOL got 5777

  • @RickolasBigDickolas
    @RickolasBigDickolas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    How didnt you travel in time you went well over 80+ mph

    • @americano2424
      @americano2424 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A) he doesn't have a flux capacitor.
      B) this isn't Back To The Future.
      C) The Hornet isn't a Delorean.

    • @RickolasBigDickolas
      @RickolasBigDickolas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Jack Howle Well god damn you gotta ruin it I wanted a bunch of green guys to go to the Wild West with a man with a orgasmic accent to narrate the whole thing and we don't need a flux capacitor when we have our Imaginations and a hell of a lot of Gold fish laced with anthrax.

    • @wolfboi7104
      @wolfboi7104 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@americano2424 r/woosh

    • @tollyjones1344
      @tollyjones1344 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This took me a moment

  • @catastroxhic6720
    @catastroxhic6720 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Physics work differently in the game than reality

  • @earthrise9064
    @earthrise9064 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The X-15 doesn't count as a plane. It counts as an aircraft. The fastest plane in the world is the SR-71 Blackbird. Produced by Lockheed Martian Skunkworks division.

    • @outrageousgamer315
      @outrageousgamer315 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      An aircraft is a vehicle which is capable of flight. You clearly have limited knowledge

    • @Muffinkakes1
      @Muffinkakes1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thomas Libenow actually the fastest plane in the world was the XB-70 Valkyrie

    • @earthrise9064
      @earthrise9064 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Muffinkakes1It got super close, but it never exceeded its top recorded speed.

    • @Muffinkakes1
      @Muffinkakes1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thomas Libenow it was never tested at %100 engine power other than takeoff

    • @earthrise9064
      @earthrise9064 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Muffinkakes1 At this point thats just a hypothesis, when the SR 71 holds the record for the fastest pane.

  • @louist7292
    @louist7292 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    22:50 “Huston lawn dart status achieved.”

  • @frederikdamlund4686
    @frederikdamlund4686 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    you dont really kniw how the game works huh?

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Frederik Damlund I know the basics or at least what I would consider basics. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • @5Puff
    @5Puff 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "we need something that is really sharp and pointy"
    THATS WHAT SHE SAID

    • @badimaaa4a548
      @badimaaa4a548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope nope nope nopenopenopenope
      I'm just gonna call Jotaro...
      *ORAORAORAORAORAORAAAA*

  • @dorthysmith1350
    @dorthysmith1350 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The stratosphere is the first layer of the atmosphere. It is closer to the ground

    • @Patriot-qe9mo
      @Patriot-qe9mo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You mean Troposphere. The Stratosphere is the second layer in Earth's atmosphere

  • @ruskiwaffle1991
    @ruskiwaffle1991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was the video that got me into KSP. Thank you, wherever you are now.

  • @Stichman5
    @Stichman5 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I made a plain that went 1350 meters a second with stock parts. Probably broke ksp Physics. I wasn’t able to do it again.

  • @ketmax2805
    @ketmax2805 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I want this man to give us an update if he's safe

  • @livinghuman2761
    @livinghuman2761 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They used scramjets in the real thing
    maybe he could get a scramjet mod
    You should try it again
    :)

  • @jagea3293
    @jagea3293 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    2,140m/s=2.1km so it was going 2.1 killometer per second

    • @trymsther1360
      @trymsther1360 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      M/s= meters per second...... Km/h= kilometers per hour

    • @trymsther1360
      @trymsther1360 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 meter / second =
      3.6 kilometers per hour

    • @trymsther1360
      @trymsther1360 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sooo 2140 (meters / second) =
      7704 kilometers per hour

    • @thewanderingvoice7349
      @thewanderingvoice7349 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for pointing out my final equation only half showed up. #SmartphoneKeyboardNotSoSmart

    • @trymsther1360
      @trymsther1360 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I DON'T GET THIS.....

  • @Troglodude05
    @Troglodude05 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just made a plane that takes 15sec to go 1500MS then it blows up from heat. I also spent only 10-20min building the thing, it’s also pretty maneuverable, until you pull up it shreds itself. So I wanted to make a SSO with that design and get some ideas from videos. And wow 😮 your plane is INSANE.

  • @MrRbabs
    @MrRbabs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The speed for the X-15 was achieved by dropping it at 108 km roughly. There's hardly any air resistance at that elevation which is why it managed the speed it did.

    • @michelletowner4212
      @michelletowner4212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was wasn’t 108km space is considered to start at 100 km the b52 that launched wouldn’t work that high as there is barely any air that altitude was the altitude it reached after being launched

    • @MrRbabs
      @MrRbabs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michelletowner4212 yes.. I realize this.. The X-15 was released from the modified bomb bay on the B-52 at the bomber's max altitude, then proceeded to climb and accelerate. It's top speed ever recorded was at 108km (roughly) and at a speed of Mach 6.7 (4,520 mph)... I do see the reason for the confusion, I typed that 2 years ago so my bad on the lack of extra words to clarify

  • @pandahood8528
    @pandahood8528 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I can make it to 1200 with one engine

    • @pandahood8528
      @pandahood8528 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      At the surface

    • @Matheus-tu8mk
      @Matheus-tu8mk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +PandaHood 8 ce eh bixao mesmo malandro

    • @max.guitar
      @max.guitar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      PandaHood 8 and is that ship called the dove? Yeah pretty sure we have all heard of it.

    • @felipecsouza6472
      @felipecsouza6472 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guy im a redpanda too

    • @DrPog
      @DrPog 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      And I can make it to 1900 m/s with one engine

  • @Octillerysnacker
    @Octillerysnacker 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Aww... I was hoping you would use stock parts.

    • @HalfEYEProduction
      @HalfEYEProduction  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Octillerysnacker I guess so but I find them less awesome looking when it comes to Control Pods etc. So I mainly install them for that but they add other stuff too and because they've been installed for so long I kinda forget what parts are from mods :/

    • @alexz7687
      @alexz7687 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did one fully stock with intakes and turbines and achieved 1700m/s, and It was able to loop the globe if you keep it around 24000m, it burns very little fuel to keep altitude and speed which is about 1500m/s.

    • @subjectnamehere8887
      @subjectnamehere8887 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Alex Z van de snelheid klop echt nix heeft bij wel wiskunde gehad of zo lol

  • @jgomega8045
    @jgomega8045 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    ...is it bad or weird that I got up to 3,500 M/s with stock parts?...without using rockets.

    • @minhkhangtran6948
      @minhkhangtran6948 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Vent Aran Did you use Rapier?

    • @jgomega8045
      @jgomega8045 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      .

    • @jgomega8045
      @jgomega8045 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      minh khang tran a combination of rapier and some ram jet engines

    • @minhkhangtran6948
      @minhkhangtran6948 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, that engine is really strong. I easily gone to 2000 m/s before it flame out.

    • @Octillerysnacker
      @Octillerysnacker 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Vent Aran how the hell did you not burn up

  • @KerbalChris
    @KerbalChris 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 2000 meters/second (1/8th) the velocity required to maintain orbit for earth the scattered air molecules at 50km, which the x-15 flew at, produced enough lift to start lifting the “plane” upward

  • @TimberDCS
    @TimberDCS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The X15 a couple times actually did exit the earth’s atmosphere

  • @FireStillPlays
    @FireStillPlays 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    dude, as of december first, i got up to 1419.6 m/s before it exploded

    • @primaryaccount7626
      @primaryaccount7626 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      With a single whiplash you can go over 1500 m/s in low atmosphere without exploding (just barely however)

  • @miraak542
    @miraak542 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Ohhh...Oh I'm a penis.." I can't even XD

  • @potionseller8943
    @potionseller8943 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    its not a plane if it's powered by rockets.
    thats called a rocket.

    • @Its_Me_Romano
      @Its_Me_Romano 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The a fighter jet is also a rocket?

    • @djyrex4306
      @djyrex4306 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its_Me_Romano _ jet fighters have jet engines ...which are not rockets ...🙃

    • @alphaneumerics
      @alphaneumerics 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its not a car if its rocket powered
      Thrust ssc exits the chat

    • @potionseller8943
      @potionseller8943 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its_Me_Romano _ no, fighter jets are powered by jet engines, they need atmosphere to function

    • @argh1989
      @argh1989 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      A plane that's powered by rocket engines is just that: A rocket plane. Such as the X-15 was, by the way.

  • @euanstrachan9834
    @euanstrachan9834 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm just speculating because I don't really know but, surely when you couldn't lift up on the scaffolding it's because you couldn't nose up because the flaps on a plane like that are meant to push down so by having flaps in front of the wheels means you cant push the tail down and raise the nose causing it to lift

  • @williampresto1961
    @williampresto1961 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:46 The stratosphere is a sky grouped at approx. 1 km altitude. Here, most planes fly and rarely hot air balloons. Also, most mid-level clouds are here. It contains primarily of oxygen, secondarily of water vapor and carbon dioxide and monoxide, and tripiarily of ozone.

  • @neoblox6753
    @neoblox6753 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    how the f do u only have 73.2 k subs

    • @neoblox6753
      @neoblox6753 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hubert Kam oh ok I didn’t know, thanks

  • @aldo1773
    @aldo1773 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you should've name it the X-69

    • @refvsluv
      @refvsluv 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      nah bruh he woulda gon to *jail*

  • @tk17_
    @tk17_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I’ve been faster, I went 3200 m/s equivalent to 7,158 mph

  • @mishamityushk8229
    @mishamityushk8229 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the stratosphere at the edge of Earth? 😂😂😂 lol nice 👍

  • @rheinchristiandiortaranzan8480
    @rheinchristiandiortaranzan8480 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:23 i love hos he says 2020 and im watching this at 2020 LOLLL

  • @TechNeo
    @TechNeo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    NASA used titanium to stop it from burning up.
    Good video!

  • @ugandanknuckles8550
    @ugandanknuckles8550 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    HalfEYE: I'm smart. I have a brain.
    Me: I didn't know

  • @leosypher9993
    @leosypher9993 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have now made a vanilla plane in KSP that I built that goes 4,100 meters per second, constant adjustments are needed to fly, if you cut the engine at any point the craft will shoot out of the atmosphere, achieve escape velocity, and enter solor orbit, my conclusion......i don't think there's a point where I really don't want to go that fast, and so I prefer my design that maxes out to 3,100 mps

  • @chrisortega9947
    @chrisortega9947 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am an aviation geek and I know that NASA did this by using 97% titanium and 2% stainless steel and 1% other heat resistance material thus allowing it to take the heat and not explode. And for the engine that allows it to reach those kinds of speed they used the XLR99. Now they used one you are using like 4.

  • @caseycolgan8321
    @caseycolgan8321 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just made a plane that goes 2100m/s at 27,000m. This plane also three extra long cargo bay lengths plus mk3 cockpit and cargo ramp at the end. It contains everything needed for a mobile sustainable science research base, using uks life support. It has a boom on the nose of the mk3 cockpit, that projects a heat shield away from the mk3 cockpit and prevents explosions. I'm thinking of downloading some realistic
    aerodynamic mod for more challenges

  • @basedeltazero714
    @basedeltazero714 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I suspect in unmodded KSP, the way to do this is 'build an SSTO'. The X-15 almost travels at a Kerbal orbital velocity anyways...

  • @1mariomaniac
    @1mariomaniac 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The reason the X-15 used those winglets was because it was kinda towed up into the air and dropped. There it would activate and kinda just blast off. It didn't need big wings to take off, they just needed control and stability.

  • @Code-002
    @Code-002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ya know, that fuel lines and struts cause drag, and there are some things named vertical stabilizers?

  • @joebama2888
    @joebama2888 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:41 captions-im going to be super anal about this. XD I DIED WHEN I SAW THAT

  • @Prich319
    @Prich319 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The X-15 flew that speed at over 30 km in fact. It's highest recorded flight was 108 km, and the pilot received astronaut wings for the flight

  • @M3dicayne
    @M3dicayne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, interesting. Getting fast is not the problem in KSP. Evoiding explosions through heat, rapid aircraft movements or the Kraken are a different story though.
    I built a Blackbird-like plane which had a HUGE turning radius, but was capable of flying almost 2.000m/s just before leaving atmosphere, just by using TweakScale with stock jet engines and plane parts. It had two cruise missiles on board through BDArmory, but that's a totally different story...

  • @darkveneno6155
    @darkveneno6155 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I made a plane that travelled almost as fast as that. It was more stable, lighter, it did not need to go suborbital, it had capacity for crew, it was made only with stock parts (it didn’t use mods.). and it didn’t require all those parts. The only diference is that it was bigger and a Little fragile. The one you built was more resistent and smaller.

  • @sticktoyourdrums8177
    @sticktoyourdrums8177 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did it! Had to ignore the laws
    of physics, but you did it!

  • @IplaySolsRNG
    @IplaySolsRNG ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow 7 years! this is crazy!

  • @Antonluisre
    @Antonluisre 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That thing has a los of lateral instability. You gotta add yaw control and vertical stabilizers

  • @pebble24
    @pebble24 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Technically, the X-15 is a rocket not a plane. But great vid anyway!!!

  • @Jacksmith-fi5fz
    @Jacksmith-fi5fz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the face when he was building in the back a car was drifting

  • @Variety_Pack
    @Variety_Pack 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you want to do the challenege for real, the plane was basically a rocket with too little fuel to reach orbit. It was dropped from the wing of a bomber at around 30,000 feet (What's that, like, 6km?) and then the plane rocketed up and away.

  • @kiwisinner
    @kiwisinner 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    16:59 DAMN IT BOB I TOLD YOU TO NOT EAT IN THE GODAMN SPACSHIP

  • @sodaithink
    @sodaithink 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    With the X-15 they attached the Spaceplane to a B-52 bomber since it couldn’t take off on its own. Once high enough, they would decouple the X-15 and start up the engine, darting through the thin atmosphere, going into space.