Because us Brits were in such a rush to build them, the early batches of engines had a common fault in that the bevel gear/skew gear arrangement that drove the camshafts would shear off and instantly stop the engine. This required the pilot to spend a few seconds looking for somewhere to crash. Spitfires were built at a shadow factory in Castle Bromwhich, Birmingham by Vickers. The aerodrome opposite was used for test flights and to ferry them to the various Squadrons. Any re work required was done at RAF Cosford a few miles North of Birmingham. One one flight the camshaft drive failed and the pilot crashed into a row of houses in Willenhall. The Merlin engine was recovered in pieces from the Kitchen. The test pilot was lucky to survive. He named his memoirs from the sound the Merlin made as the camshaft drive broke and stopped the engine: Sigh For A Merlin. And it’s one of the best aviation books I’ve ever read. Today Vickers Castle Bromwich is now a vast Jaguar car plant. The aerodrome is a huge council housing estate and RAF Cosford is a lovely free museum.
What a beautiful and amazing machine. Antiquated, but still very impressive to this day, and I suspect people would say the same 100+ years from now...
Compression ratios, they're double what the Merlin could do in your everyday car. Increases power and efficiency, I guess modern alloys are the key? That and 100 years of people trying to solve the same problems. 6:1 on the Merlin, which means the open size of the cylinder is six times the size when it's closed up at the top. Without the right design, a high compression ratio detonates the petrol air mix before the spark plug can ignite it and that is _very_ bad for your engine. It pushes DOWN on the piston while it's still going UP 😬😬 🛩️💥🪂
I couldn't imagine the power one of these would have produced running on 150 octane. One seriously beautiful piece of engineering that powered those Spitfire Mk. IXs and later variants. The Griffon engines are just as incredible. It's awesome to see pieces of history being kept alive and in running order like this.
The engine pictured is an early 20 series single stage supercharged version the most common model used during the war,, ie 3 bladed Prop. This engine never went in a Mk IX shitfire, 60 series used in Mk IX used a 4 bladed prop and the 2 stage supercharger, this engine used in like shitfire Mk V or Lancasters aor hurrycanes, or early mossies !!! sorry but the merlin using 150 octane could NOT take the boost to take advantage of the octane !!
1.) It's SPITFIRE. 2.) That's a demo prop only. @@wilburfinnigan2142 3.) Octane is mute, and totally depends on boost level, temp, and combustion chamber design.
My dad saw and heard the Lancaster squadrons fly over when he was a kid near Doncaster in the war. It still makes his eyes tear up to think about it. He says it's an unmistakable noise..
Carbureted engines have the most on-command power than a modern ecu. The modern ecu will "hunt" for a good mixture and setting, which makes response time slow. Carburetors work on-command, dumping in as much fuel as the operator pleases.
@@eugenecrabs3954 The p47 thunderbolt turbocharger was unresponsive at high alts too, but for 90% of the performance envelope i think it's a great trade-off
Just for those who can't tell, the frame rate of the camera can't pick up the rotation of the blades, so it looks like it is barely moving, but it is spinning very fast.
cant pick up?? if that was true, the blades would be a blur. (like they are when you see them in person.) the fact is is that the shutter speed of the camera is VERY FAST. and so you see the blades sometimes stand still.
coolbluelights That's exactly what I thought. An engine like this can power a fair sized aeroplane. Surely it could pull a little trailer like this forwards, even if it were strapped to the ground. I wouldn't particularly want to be standing in front of it just in case.
Joshua Rosen Also, at full throttle, the exhaust of the Merlin engines was supersonic. The angle of the exhaust increased the planes' top speed quite a bit if I recall.
Joshua Rosen It's a cut down prop that won't generate as much thrust as a full size prop. And they wouldn't go full throttle without a full load on the engine, otherwise it will overspeed and be damaged or possibly come apart. Lastly, the engine, prop, and trailer are topping 2000 lbs and it would take a lot to move it.
@@bdzelda5849 I think the effect you are talking about occurs when the light source is flashing at a specific rate. What we are seeing here has to do with the camera's frame rate. You wouldn't see it if you were there.
Had the privilege of seeing the BBMF back in the ‘70s, the sound of 6 Merlins was amazing. Also, saw/heard the Nanton Lanc doing a run of all four engines. Absolutely fabulous (yes)!
....oh....and in the Mother Country we fit Gentlemen into jalopies and fly off to bruise the filthy Hun. Powered by dirty bitches like this one.... " my dad's bigger than your dad"... "That's not what your mum says"!
The fact that people are standing in front of that monster is incomprehensible. No doubt provisions were made to anchor the beast but.....things happen. Thank you for this vid. Fantastic.
bliglum I don't think they'd risk pushing it. Parts are very rare for them and not even pilots would use full throttle unless it was needed. The key to an engine lasting a long time is constant smooth operation. You use full power to get out of a pinch, but it shouldn't be thought of as an engine's normal operating condition. Some engines are better at it than others though. Ship diesel engines can run a long time at full power because they rotate slowly and because their components tend to be more resilient to forces, but aircraft used light materials. Take care of your engine and it will be good to you for many years :)
As well as that prop not absorbing the power. Even in the aircraft they can't actually open the throttle fully at ground level. The supercharger(s)(this looks like a single stage supercharger version, although i could be wrong) make full boost, with no pressure relief, all the time; so opening the throttle at ground level creates too high a manifold pressure and will overboost the engine.
This engine was detrimental during World War II! Something Great Britain should consider a National Treasure! And without it the Mustang would have never been so successful for us here in the USA!
jstanbury61 And we won too. Can you hear that noise ?? That's the sound of the Leave train pulling out of Brussels station. Next Stop Denmark. All Aboard !!! Mind The Gap !!!
jstanbury61"Let us go forward together" We shall never surrender. Never never never never give in. Broad sunlit uplands..... If necessary for years, if necessary alone.....
The sight, sound and smell of a post war bankrupt country that would have lost if it wasn't for the Americans, and infighting in Göring's Luftwaffe, but let's not let facts get in the way of misty eyed nostalgia shall we?!
For those that don't know; the prop is turning as fast as the engine. But it synchronizes with the frame rate speed of the camera taking the video. Which makes it appear at times to be still, or even going backwards.
@@Coltnz1 Yes that was typical of the day, in order to make propellers that created more thrust they had to be made larger, the problem is a large prop can only be spun so fast, particularly for an aircraft flying at speed before its efficiency drops due to transonic flow at the tips.
@@johnyoung1128 Dunno about Air Propellers, but the Efficiency of Water Propellers increases at slow Speeds. That's why Marine Engine Development tries to increase Stroke Length as much as possible; current Engines have Stroke-Bore-Ratios of up to 5:1, to achieve Top Speeds of 70 RPM and less.
@@johnyoung1128 Air Propeller Tips usually get very close to Mach 1 don't they? That would have to be about 5 Times (300 odd m/s vs 500 odd m/s) as fast in Water, and even much slower Speeds would cause insane Levels of Cavitation.
They were indeed liquid cooled, generally around 35 - 50 % Ethylene Glycol with water.This mix would allow a higher boiling point ( along with a pressureized cooling system ) and thus a higher operating temperature ( more efficiency ). If you look closely on this display, you can see the radiator down between the rearmost pair of wheels on the trailer. Like most all liquid cooled aero engines, when on the ground, stationary, or slow taxiing would see them get pretty hot. Some of the early ( pre mk v ) Spits with single radiators could overheat when on the ground.
question 8 years later and I hope you're doing well!! Were they supercharged or methanol water injected at all?. would this have an effect on then heat or operating temp of the engine?.
@@jammiedodger629 Hi Jammie Dodger, yes, they were supercharged. Most would have a single stage, two speed supercharger, as visible on the back of the video merlin. Some later engines would have a two stage supercharger and intercooler. These were used in the likes of later 'Mosquito's ' ( and other aircraft ) where speed was literally a life saver, and engine performance was available at much higher altitudes. Yep, compressed air gets hot, so the intercooler was employed to reduce the intake charge temps to workable levels and reduce the possibility of engine killing pre ignition and detonation from happening. 👍👍
Can you imagine? Being a teenager and being strapped to the back of one of those Awesome engines flying through the air. If given the opportunity I would have been there in a heartbeat.
I like how at the RPM where the rate of on blade moving into the space of the previous one matches the frame rate of the camera, the blade "stops" but then you can catch a glipse of the individual blades flickering in the one spot! Like using a variable stroboscope on a fan!
... and at every multiple of the camera's frame rate. While watching American western shows on the TV in the 1960s, I was interested in wagon wheels appearing to rotate slowly in reverse. I quickly worked out that the spoke rate (or a multiple thereof) was slightly slower than the camera's frame rate.
That is a Beautiful Designed Engine. I used to see them in our American Hydroplane racers , years ago along with our Allison V-12 engines. I really wish America would invest in V-12 auto engines and put them in some of our performance cars. There is nothing like a V-12 singing at FULL ROAR !! 5 stars video *****
The McLaren F1- I am referring to was made like between 1994 and 1997? . It was powered by a normally aspirated BMW V-12 , producing 682 Brake Horsepower. Those cars if you can find one, start at a Million+ at auction. I liked the fact you could have three seats in the front or just one in the middle. Now that is the Only McLaren worthy of its name and has my respect. The Rest of the line up is just low budgets posers with a McLaren Badge.
I had a friend that was familiar with the F1. He said the Transmission was like moving Ratchets thru the gears, but it was solid steel and damn near bulletproof. The Original F1 with the gold engine heat shield and two custom luggage bays is the one I would like to own. The car was carbon fiber, weighed 2500 Pounds soaking wet and had a Bmw v-12 producing 682 horsepower. An average Toyota camry weighs 3900 pounds and a Lamborghini Countach weighs 3600 pounds. My friend claims that driving the F1 is more like a Works GP Motorcycle accelerating more than a car would. A power to weight ratio in the F1 makes it a classic and top of the top. I wish MaClaren would not dilute the brand with v-6 or whatever. Just build a Super F1 and LET THE SAME DESIGNER AS THE ORIGINAL F1, design it. THat would be worth seeing. RH dsd
You're right, but there is a reason why: a V-12 sounds wonderful but only if it has a 60-degree vee angle, just like the Merlin. The 1960s Ferrari V-12s made heavenly sounds, not the raspy noise of its modern engines. It's a similar feeling when listening to traditional melodies versus modern atonal music.
Peter43John sadly the Merlin was one of the smaller aircraft engines used in WW II Only a trainer like the AT ^ Texan had a smaller engine about 1300 cu in. Merlin was 1650 !!!!
I have on several occasions stood in front of both a Spitfire and Lancaster with the engine(s) running at full throttle, in the case of the Lancaster that was 3300 RPM at 12lbs boost. I can assure you the noise is vastly in excess of what this guy has here, and the sound of those airworthy engines, even at max throttle, was vastly purer and sweeter, this one sounds as rough as a bag of spanners.
They sound incredible when you're sitting in the second seat on a P-51 mustang,, with that monster screaming at full throttle 5 ft in front of you. Best plane ride I ever took
I'm curious, what would be the replacement cost of that engine from an insurance point of view? Also, have you ever been approached by museums wanting to purchase your engine for a restoration project?- Thanks for posting.
Jursh Wells You miss the point. It's an ancient antique, which outstrips modern engines for power. Imagine if the same people could use their wisdom, with todays tech?
I went to Garstang rally, Lancashire years ago, and they had a mounted Merlin like this running, and also a Rolls Royce Griffon (Avro Shackleton engine). Although both of them ran, they had faults that meant they were not suitable for fitting in airworthy aircraft.
I DON'T CARE what anybody says that is the best sounding engine in the WORLD!!!! & Built by the best company ROLLS ROYCE. That MERLIN engine I LOVE IT!!!!! 😍😍😍😍. Well the engine has been put in a car a BENTLEY. & it sounds just as BEAUTIFUL in the car as it does in that MAGNIFICENT AIRCRAFT the SPITFIRE! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏
Thinking of the power output of a Merlin in it's latest form, and one that was built new today with electronic fuel injection, computer ignition mapping I wonder what the power output would be attained. I think it would be phenomenal!
I have just finished reading a majority of the comments about this video and the "fact" that the operator never ran it up to full throttle because of... So I challenge you experts to back up your reasoning with some real facts and stop the nonsense! First) The propeller is much smaller diameter for this kind of display usage. Second) The style of the propeller is called a "Variable Pitch Prop" where the angle of the blades can be adjusted from an almost flat position to a fully feathered position (to minimize drag on the aircraft while flying if the motor was damaged/shutdown) Third) Another person commented that the blades could very well be "fixed" and locked down in pitch (something only the owner would know for sure), just enough pitch to produce a load on the engine and airflow across the radiator). Fourth) This video was recorded using a "VIDEO" camera. Video cameras do not have "shutters" inside of them. It is the "FRAME RATE" of the video camera (industry standard with a few exceptions, that is based upon the ability of the human eye to see "motion" from flickering cards or picture frames above a certain frequency, or frames per second, which is 24 FPS), that causes the "wagon wheel affect" or more accurately the "Stroboscopic" affect. Fifth) I have personally stood next to an F-111F while one of its engines were being ran for testing/troubleshooting, with 7 stage afterburner lit up. That would be 25,100 pounds of thrust and the only things holding it were the wheel chocks and full on brakes in the cockpit by the technician. The aircraft never moved during that test!! I've had the opportunity to eye witness these engine test runs on at least a dozen occasions, without incident, during my active duty time in the Air Force. Sixth) Unless you have a tachometer displaying the actual RPM of the motor, it is just a "Guess-timate" people are writing of the RPM of the motor. What are they basing that on? The wind speed blowing back over the "owner"? read first, second and third; the rotational speed of the propeller? Read fourth; Or perhaps, they are judging the engine RPM based upon the sound of the engine? Well, Read Seventh; Seventh) Unless the owner of the video camera recording this video just so happened to have an aftermarket microphone capable of handling upwards of 130-35 dB plugged in, the audio from this video wouldn't even come close to reproducing the actual exhaust volume level that this engine was producing live! No cell phone manufacturer provides that capability for their cell phone mics! Now I do agree with several comments about the engine not "sounding" at its best, a couple of backfires, etc. possibly affecting the full throttle power. But, no one but the operator of the engine really knows if he ran it up to full throttle or not! Although I do concur with and fully agree with the comments about not standing on either side of the plane of rotation of the propeller, the comments about hamburger meat etc. for those standing in front of the engine (30 feet of more) are really just based on ignorance!! BTW, no one had commented about, therefore didn't pay attention to, the fact that the man operating the engine is holding some sort of cable in his hand, that went with him as he backed off from the engine. I can't prove it but I would be willing to bet that it is some sort of a "Kill" of "Dead man" switch that would shut down the engine very quickly in case of any emergency! Jay Leno has the exact same kind of an engine (Merlin 2 stage compressor, V-12) on a transportable engine stand. I had just watched his video about it on youtube last month. He talked about replacing his damaged radiator, how much coolant, etc. the engine contained (self-contained). Except for fuel and batteries, these aircraft engines had to be completely self contained for ease of replacement and to keep damage from spreading to the other engines of a multi-engine aircraft. It would be nice if those who don't know what they are writing about would not write it for the public to read!!
+ebonyblitz1 You touch on the correct reasons for not being full throttle. The engine note is not close to full throttle if you compare with aircraft on takeoff or high RPM ground test. We don't have a tachometer reading but here is a high-power Spitfire test, with some nice prop torque for extra effect. th-cam.com/video/jETagNM1tfg/w-d-xo.html Arguably "full throttle" is War-Emergency Power and that can damage the engine over long periods, so it would not be full throttle. The second reason for not being full throttle is the cut down propeller with a smaller mass. It would be very easy to over-speed the engine at higher throttle settings and things inside will break or begin to come apart. The owner would not want to damage his carefully rebuilt display engine. Here is a nice picture of a connecting rod failure that split a Merlin in half. 1.bp.blogspot.com/-nhr05HgolkM/TnZT9qUAuqI/AAAAAAAAAac/GmkCI4yRJXs/s1600/P9152832.JPG
Although it sounds different (for obvious reasons) than the drag cars nearby, it also sounds good. To me, it's kind of vicious, but also somehow soothing. If that makes any sense to you. Admittedly, I like the sound of both, the drag cars and the aircraft engine. Since this was filmed 9 years ago, I'm hoping nothing bad happened to it, and I hope they put it into something it would originally have gone into, such as a P51 mustang. I know there were other planes that used this engine, but that's one of the most famous aircraft to use it.
Amazingly well designed engine that was a big part in allowing the Allies to win, the Brits nailed it with that design and with the help of us Americans we made alooooot of them.
I found the engineering of the display/demo engine mounting trailer ALSO fascinating as the Merlin while considering what the owner/builder/collector wanted to use the engine for: spectacular, affordable, portable, mobile indoor/outdoor public historical appreciation displays and demonstrations. But the huge propeller wash and foul startup exhaust are being fought throughout the show by the hapless controller(s). Using that same engineering brilliance to engineer the controls outside the blast area seems easily done. Further, protective eyewear should always be worn directly behind a running engine, imho. This Merlin's a magnificent, masterfully made and restored machine and sheer wonder to behold. Ittssa swords to plowshares transformation, so to speak, farming for future minds.
"Early production Merlins had numerous problems that led to their reliability being questioned. The leaked their coolants and the cylinder head frequently cracked. However, by version Merlin ‘F’ all major issues had been resolved and the engine officially became Merlin Mark I." History Learning Site UK Rolls Royce Merlin
The Merlin is often thought of as exceptional engineering but, as you say, there was a tortuous development. RR was reluctant to get into this business. I think those who pushed for it knew RR, once engaged, would be obsessive about getting it right.
The prop is obviously a slip arrangement just for show. If the prop was full-on gear driven, the rig would rip out of the ground, make hamburger out of everyone around it, and self destruct during the process.
Trust me that props moving Optical contusions in your brain and cameras magic makes it look still or backwards even. Any turntable with a strobe can show you that "trick"
I installed a Merlin into a 1985 Toyota MR 2. It fit right into the engine bay, and bolted right up to the stock motor mounts too! It very convenient, and there was still lots of room around the engine to do maintenance! I was even thinking of installing either a 2nd Merlin into the MR 2, right beside the first one, or installing a Pratt & Whitney R2800 radial beside the Merlin in the MR 2. It would probably be more balanced that way. Still have the stock suspension and shocks too! But I am concerned that it still won't have quite enough torque to get the MR 2 up shallow hills, with 2 large airplane engines though.....
R2800 isn't enough, only 18 cylinders. Try an R4360, 28 cylinders. If you're pulling a small trailer you should go diesel - Napier Deltic, or Zvedza M503 (144 litres, 42 cylinders) or M504 (56 cylinders). For a full size camping trailer, you need a Zvedza M507, though I'm not sure 384 liters / 112 cylinders is enough for that.
AEthelstan Packard did more than "Just build them under license" they improved them and built tens of thousands of them for the Brits, thats why Packard was building them...the Brits could not build them fast enough. You need to get your facts straight, been researching the Packard involvement for many years,,,
AEthelstan Rolls Royce came to Packard and paid Packard $130,000,000.00 to build engines for Rolls Royce....pretty simple isn't it???And Packard went on to not only build the engine but modify it nd improve it and to mass produce it. Packard in 4 years built 55,525 engines and all but abot 12,000 went to the British. Packard did the Brits and Rolls Royce a HUGE favor by building this engine as The Brits could not build them fast enough. The British built Lancaster Mk B III was the largest used of the Packard built merlin 3,440, ONE HALF the total Lancaster production used the Packard built engine. It was a WIN WIN for the Brits that Packard built the engines for them...Is that so hard to understand?????
Those of you that no NOTHING about airplanes, listen up, the engines do not run at 8000 rpm.. That would be stupid.. Find your facts and then come back and be amazed at this engine, that prop is for show and tell and to run air to cool.. Power output: 2,035 hp (1,520 kW) at 7,000 ft (2,135 m MS gear),[nb 7] +18 psi boost pressure at 2,750 rpm 2,220 hp (1,655 kW) at 11,000 ft (2,135 m MS gear), +21 psi at 2,750 r.p.m using 150 Octane fuel
Ian Findlay Fuck off, when dealing with stupid people it helps to get their attention, since it only lasts 5 minutes.. And that is not snotty, it is the truth, they have no idea what they are looking at and make a stupid comment..........Like yours..
Love how the video progressive scanning can't keep up with the propeller blade. So the blade appears to suddenly stand still or slowly go backwards when it spinning fast.
I'm not certain but I'd guess the prop pitch is very minimal and the prop is likely not as large as it would be if fitted to an actual aircraft, both would severly limit the thrust produced.
It's probably a variable pitch prop off of a corsair with modified pitch, just like the rest of them. I have yet to see a display with an original 4-blade prop off of a real mustang. Or at anywhere close to full throttle.
@@bryanseitz6235 Thats because the 20 series early merlins used a 3 bladed prop !!! DUUUHH!!!! Only the LATER 60 series Merlins and the PACKARD V1650-3 or -7 used a 4 bladed prop !!!! FYI That engine version NOT used in a Mustang !!!! FYI !!!!
Mostly correct. Since they are using cut-down props there will not be a full load on the engine. They would never go full throttle since the engine would over-speed and start breaking things or come apart.
What a beautiful piece of machinery and engineering. >now having this vision of having one in my garage and pulling it out once in awhile and running it just for fun
Now that is what i call a fabulous desk fan lol,seriously though its gorgeous what an engine and no way is it near any full throttle lol as some have suggested the trailer would never hold it.
+mark farley two words "variable" "pitch" . . the prop has blades that can turn to a flat angle and produce no thrust at all or only enough to cool the engine in this case, but even at half throttle or so ( FULL THROTTLE my ass) had it been turned to max thrust output i thing the trailer would at least start to act up a bit
+mark farley two words "variable" "pitch" . . the prop has blades that can turn to a flat angle and produce no thrust at all or only enough to cool the engine in this case, but even at half throttle or so ( FULL THROTTLE my ass) had it been turned to max thrust output i thing the trailer would at least start to act up a bit
Because us Brits were in such a rush to build them, the early batches of engines had a common fault in that the bevel gear/skew gear arrangement that drove the camshafts would shear off and instantly stop the engine. This required the pilot to spend a few seconds looking for somewhere to crash.
Spitfires were built at a shadow factory in Castle Bromwhich, Birmingham by Vickers. The aerodrome opposite was used for test flights and to ferry them to the various Squadrons.
Any re work required was done at RAF Cosford a few miles North of Birmingham. One one flight the camshaft drive failed and the pilot crashed into a row of houses in Willenhall. The Merlin engine was recovered in pieces from the Kitchen. The test pilot was lucky to survive.
He named his memoirs from the sound the Merlin made as the camshaft drive broke and stopped the engine: Sigh For A Merlin.
And it’s one of the best aviation books I’ve ever read.
Today Vickers Castle Bromwich is now a vast Jaguar car plant. The aerodrome is a huge council housing estate and RAF Cosford is a lovely free museum.
The Merlin from WWII and the Huey from Nam. Two of the most beautiful sounds ever.
That Sir, is a fact!
What a beautiful and amazing machine. Antiquated, but still very impressive to this day, and I suspect people would say the same 100+ years from now...
Compression ratios, they're double what the Merlin could do in your everyday car.
Increases power and efficiency, I guess modern alloys are the key?
That and 100 years of people trying to solve the same problems.
6:1 on the Merlin, which means the open size of the cylinder is six times the size when it's closed up at the top.
Without the right design, a high compression ratio detonates the petrol air mix before the spark plug can ignite it and that is _very_ bad for your engine. It pushes DOWN on the piston while it's still going UP
😬😬
🛩️💥🪂
Puts less power out per litre than my Wolseley Landcrab mod.H and the Triumph Vitesse.
@@rosiehawtrey they ended up putting out 55kW per litre. That's within 75% or better compared to modern 2023 standards.
but neither of which make a sound that comes close to this wonderful engine
I couldn't imagine the power one of these would have produced running on 150 octane. One seriously beautiful piece of engineering that powered those Spitfire Mk. IXs and later variants. The Griffon engines are just as incredible. It's awesome to see pieces of history being kept alive and in running order like this.
Imagine the power Merlins would make when updated with modern technology.
The engine pictured is an early 20 series single stage supercharged version the most common model used during the war,, ie 3 bladed Prop. This engine never went in a Mk IX shitfire, 60 series used in Mk IX used a 4 bladed prop and the 2 stage supercharger, this engine used in like shitfire Mk V or Lancasters aor hurrycanes, or early mossies !!! sorry but the merlin using 150 octane could NOT take the boost to take advantage of the octane !!
@@wilburfinnigan2142I'd take your word if you spoke like an adult
Imagine some nitromethane
1.) It's SPITFIRE. 2.) That's a demo prop only. @@wilburfinnigan2142 3.) Octane is mute, and totally depends on boost level, temp, and combustion chamber design.
Not just a work of art a national treasure and the true spirit of a free and proud Britain
I wanna own a spitfire and call her "spirit of Brexit" for those very reasons
Garry Mills the story of the spitfire designer is just astounding , it touches your soul , it saved millions of souls
Michele Di What about the 55,523 of the Merlins PACKARD built in the USA of which the limeys got 37137 of them ?????
Wilbur Finnigan not just for limeys the allies were united to drive facism and evil tyranny from existence to horrendous cost
@@micheledibenedetto7780 The Brits did NOT do it on their own !!!! They had help !!!! Lots of help !!!!!!!M
What an amazing piece of machinery! And to think they churned these out by huge quantities, with no time to spare. Beautiful thing to watch.
LASR71 And PACKARD in AMERICA made 55,525 and Ford UK made 33,000 thats 85,000 of the 150,000 total made RR themselves made less than 1/2of them !!!
What an amazing engine! Imagine what an entire squadron must have sounded like overhead.
Proud as fuck
My dad saw and heard the Lancaster squadrons fly over when he was a kid near Doncaster in the war.
It still makes his eyes tear up to think about it. He says it's an unmistakable noise..
It sounded like the fury of Britain in all its glory. Then you thought, I'm sure glad those things are on our side...
The sound struck fear into the hearts of the Nazis.
Love to think how much power this would make with modern ECUs and manufacturing.
Carbureted engines have the most on-command power than a modern ecu. The modern ecu will "hunt" for a good mixture and setting, which makes response time slow. Carburetors work on-command, dumping in as much fuel as the operator pleases.
@@eugenecrabs3954 The p47 thunderbolt turbocharger was unresponsive at high alts too, but for 90% of the performance envelope i think it's a great trade-off
@@eugenecrabs3954 Modern fuel injection is much more precise than a carb
@@FullThrottleRacing535 Yes for course racing but for drag racing no, carbs all day for "drag racing".
Top fuel dragsters use carbs not efi
Just for those who can't tell, the frame rate of the camera can't pick up the rotation of the blades, so it looks like it is barely moving, but it is spinning very fast.
No flies on you! :)
cant pick up?? if that was true, the blades would be a blur. (like they are when you see them in person.) the fact is is that the shutter speed of the camera is VERY FAST. and so you see the blades sometimes stand still.
kenns9.
You can tell from the reflections on the inside of the propellers too; when it looks immobile the reflections change in an inconsistent way
Wouldn't wanna put yer fingers in it!
Indeed a beautiful beast. Terrific engineering, design and production. Masterful.
I don't think that was full throttle.. if they really opened it up I don't think that little trailer would be able to hold it there.
coolbluelights exactly and also big puffs of smoke from a cylinder on the left side, I think the engine is a bit damaged.
coolbluelights That's exactly what I thought. An engine like this can power a fair sized aeroplane. Surely it could pull a little trailer like this forwards, even if it were strapped to the ground. I wouldn't particularly want to be standing in front of it just in case.
Joshua Rosen Its a small prop. It wouldn't be able to absorb full power anyway within the engines safe rpm range.
Joshua Rosen Also, at full throttle, the exhaust of the Merlin engines was supersonic. The angle of the exhaust increased the planes' top speed quite a bit if I recall.
Joshua Rosen
It's a cut down prop that won't generate as much thrust as a full size prop. And they wouldn't go full throttle without a full load on the engine, otherwise it will overspeed and be damaged or possibly come apart. Lastly, the engine, prop, and trailer are topping 2000 lbs and it would take a lot to move it.
Looks and sounds good. Amazing stroboscopic effect on the blade.
Grant W. Whitwam always wondered what they called it! Cheers
@@bdzelda5849 I think the effect you are talking about occurs when the light source is flashing at a specific rate. What we are seeing here has to do with the camera's frame rate. You wouldn't see it if you were there.
B E A U T I F U L machine of power, superb design! Memorable in war and peace. Thank you
Had the privilege of seeing the BBMF back in the ‘70s, the sound of 6 Merlins was amazing. Also, saw/heard the Nanton Lanc doing a run of all four engines. Absolutely fabulous (yes)!
Oh maaan, I just love huge, powerful pieces of machinery just working away.
That warping effect at 3:25 was awesome
To the people in the crowd directly in line with the prop
..."Is the parking brake on"
Yes, dangerous. It's not full throttle
1430 HP of British pride.
There's always one
@soaringtractor you really are an obnoxious twat
...and a sad anorak.
....oh....and in the Mother Country we fit Gentlemen into jalopies and fly off to bruise the filthy Hun.
Powered by dirty bitches like this one....
" my dad's bigger than your dad"...
"That's not what your mum says"!
@soaringtractor Why is this necessary? Have to say I agree with jase6370.
The fact that people are standing in front of that monster is incomprehensible. No doubt provisions were made to anchor the beast but.....things happen.
Thank you for this vid. Fantastic.
It was run at lower thrust & lower rpm.
All it needs is some decent chocks for the trailer wheels.
That wasn't even close to full throttle.
You right.. We can see the throttle right there, stick with the yellow handle. Looks like he got up to about half throttle though!
bliglum
I don't think they'd risk pushing it. Parts are very rare for them and not even pilots would use full throttle unless it was needed. The key to an engine lasting a long time is constant smooth operation. You use full power to get out of a pinch, but it shouldn't be thought of as an engine's normal operating condition. Some engines are better at it than others though. Ship diesel engines can run a long time at full power because they rotate slowly and because their components tend to be more resilient to forces, but aircraft used light materials. Take care of your engine and it will be good to you for many years :)
yeah , full throttle , they only rev to about 1400 rpm to make their 1200-odd horsepower .
That cut off prop is not large enough to absorb full power. The engine would over speed, so they can't run full power.
As well as that prop not absorbing the power.
Even in the aircraft they can't actually open the throttle fully at ground level. The supercharger(s)(this looks like a single stage supercharger version, although i could be wrong) make full boost, with no pressure relief, all the time; so opening the throttle at ground level creates too high a manifold pressure and will overboost the engine.
This engine was detrimental during World War II! Something Great Britain should consider a National Treasure! And without it the Mustang would have never been so successful for us here in the USA!
clark plumb do you mean instrumental?
@@Harry_S96 well it was detrimental to the enemy!!
EightPawsProductions you’re not wrong haha
clark6390 Ever single merlin engine used in a production Merlin Mustang was made in AMERICA by PACKARD !!! so what the hell is your point ????
@@wilburfinnigan2142 Packer got the license from rolls royce to build
beautiful piece of mechanical engineering from the past, this is on my wish list of I win the lottery xxx
The sight, sound and smell of Victory.
Victory at any cost.
i just posted the same comment as yourself before reading yours....glad we feel the same way.
jstanbury61 And we won too.
Can you hear that noise ??
That's the sound of the Leave train pulling out of Brussels station. Next Stop Denmark.
All Aboard !!!
Mind The Gap !!!
Good luck Denmark and Holland too!
jstanbury61"Let us go forward together"
We shall never surrender.
Never never never never give in.
Broad sunlit uplands.....
If necessary for years, if necessary alone.....
The sight, sound and smell of a post war bankrupt country that would have lost if it wasn't for the Americans, and infighting in Göring's Luftwaffe, but let's not let facts get in the way of misty eyed nostalgia shall we?!
you got a 454 in your chevy truck?? thats cute
... hold my beer
Damn bro....how you gonna bash a 454 like that? 😂😂🤣 But yes! What an amazing engine that Merlin is!
Lmaoo
Who's askin? Jay Leno?
Your vehicle has wheels? Thats cute
The stroboscopic effect is awesome on the propeller. It almost looks like you could reach in and grab one of the blades.
For those that don't know; the prop is turning as fast as the engine. But it synchronizes with the frame rate speed of the camera taking the video. Which makes it appear at times to be still, or even going backwards.
Actually the Merlin turned over twice for every turn of the prop. 2:1 ratio.
@@Coltnz1 Yes that was typical of the day, in order to make propellers that created more thrust they had to be made larger, the problem is a large prop can only be spun so fast, particularly for an aircraft flying at speed before its efficiency drops due to transonic flow at the tips.
@@johnyoung1128 Dunno about Air Propellers, but the Efficiency of Water Propellers increases at slow Speeds. That's why Marine Engine Development tries to increase Stroke Length as much as possible; current Engines have Stroke-Bore-Ratios of up to 5:1, to achieve Top Speeds of 70 RPM and less.
@@Genius_at_Work Well that’s the difference between aerodynamics and hydrodynamics.
@@johnyoung1128 Air Propeller Tips usually get very close to Mach 1 don't they? That would have to be about 5 Times (300 odd m/s vs 500 odd m/s) as fast in Water, and even much slower Speeds would cause insane Levels of Cavitation.
Finally a ceiling fan that can keep my room cool
The heart of P51 Mustang, Spitfire, Lancaster bomber and another one.
Quite a few more actually, and the de-rated Merlin,known as the Meteor, powered the Cromwell tank among others.
Mosquito and Hurricane to.
What could go wrong. Sweet piece of engineering and craftsmanship.
The most beautiful sound the sky has ever heard
Until Concorde.
They were indeed liquid cooled, generally around 35 - 50 % Ethylene Glycol with water.This mix would allow a higher boiling point ( along with a pressureized cooling system ) and thus a higher operating temperature ( more efficiency ). If you look closely on this display, you can see the radiator down between the rearmost pair of wheels on the trailer.
Like most all liquid cooled aero engines, when on the ground, stationary, or slow taxiing would see them get pretty hot. Some of the early ( pre mk v ) Spits with single radiators could overheat when on the ground.
question 8 years later and I hope you're doing well!! Were they supercharged or methanol water injected at all?. would this have an effect on then heat or operating temp of the engine?.
@@jammiedodger629 Hi Jammie Dodger, yes, they were supercharged. Most would have a single stage, two speed supercharger, as visible on the back of the video merlin. Some later engines would have a two stage supercharger and intercooler. These were used in the likes of later 'Mosquito's ' ( and other aircraft ) where speed was literally a life saver, and engine performance was available at much higher altitudes. Yep, compressed air gets hot, so the intercooler was employed to reduce the intake charge temps to workable levels and reduce the possibility of engine killing pre ignition and detonation from happening. 👍👍
@@harrothepilot Thanks for the informative reply mate! :)
The best aero-piston engine ever !
There were other engines more reliable and more powerful !!! ie PW R2800 Wright R2600
A 0pinion,its like sshole.How about db 605....
The movie Dunkirk brought me here. The part where the dad says “Rolls-Royce Merlin engines. The sweetest sound you could hear out here”.
Beuitiful Sound!
Amazing!!
Historic Classic!!!
Goddamn, that engine was a masterpiece.
the greatest thing rolls royce made
reggiegrant,,, BUT.....PACKARD in AMERICA made 55,525 of them 1/3 the total and FORD UK made another 33,000 !!! Facts of history son !!!
Wow, that is some seriously impressive stuff. This is friggin awesome!
Can you imagine?
Being a teenager and being strapped to the back of one of those Awesome engines flying through the air. If given the opportunity I would have been there in a heartbeat.
Steampunk to the max! I love this old machinery, it's got a life and patina all its own.
Unreal, unmatched at the time a marvel of engineering no doubt won the air war for Britain and made the P51 what it was for us Americans
kaneroberts Ever Production Merlin Mustang had it engine Made in AMERICA by PACKARD, who also made 37,137 FOR THE BRITS !!!!!
I cant believe people stand that close to the prop.
Duckyistrippin Me neither.. directly inline with it, to be fair the metal railings would protect them..
When he got close I was pooping in my pants 😲😲😲
Plane of rotation hazard
First thing I thought too! Could be disastrous!
Meh, it wouldn't hurt a bit if you got hit
Fantastic engine....all I could hear was Spitfires. The engine that helped win the war!
J Whyte You’re forgetting Mustangs and Liberators as they also used this engine. Packhard also made the Merlin.
Hawker hurricanes won the war bellend
Stevie Bee ... Liberators used radial engines .
@@rickyelich3908 yes, the Pratt & Whitney R1830.
@@steviebee1989 You mean LANCASTERS????? they used the merlin Liberators used a PW R1820 Radial !!! DUUUUHH!!!!!!!
I like how at the RPM where the rate of on blade moving into the space of the previous one matches the frame rate of the camera, the blade "stops" but then you can catch a glipse of the individual blades flickering in the one spot! Like using a variable stroboscope on a fan!
... and at every multiple of the camera's frame rate.
While watching American western shows on the TV in the 1960s, I was interested in wagon wheels appearing to rotate slowly in reverse. I quickly worked out that the spoke rate (or a multiple thereof) was slightly slower than the camera's frame rate.
This what every ride along lawn mower should look like .........
thank you for your time and consideration for showing this great engine
I'm sitting here in my 2.7 litre V6 thinking "man, I wish I could remove that period and add six more cylinders.
I see your a car person as well
little fun fact: the rolls royce merlin is a 27 liter engine
That is a Beautiful Designed Engine. I used to see them in our American Hydroplane racers , years ago along with our Allison V-12 engines. I really wish America would invest in V-12 auto engines and put them in some of our performance cars. There is nothing like a V-12 singing at FULL ROAR !! 5 stars video *****
A McLaren without a F1-V12 is not a McLaren in my opinion.
The McLaren F1- I am referring to was made like between 1994 and 1997? . It was powered by a normally aspirated BMW V-12 , producing 682 Brake Horsepower. Those cars if you can find one, start at a Million+ at auction. I liked the fact you could have three seats in the front or just one in the middle. Now that is the Only McLaren worthy of its name and has my respect. The Rest of the line up is just low budgets posers with a McLaren Badge.
I had a friend that was familiar with the F1. He said the Transmission was like moving Ratchets thru the gears, but it was solid steel and damn near bulletproof. The Original F1 with the gold engine heat shield and two custom luggage bays is the one I would like to own. The car was carbon fiber, weighed 2500 Pounds soaking wet and had a Bmw v-12 producing 682 horsepower. An average Toyota camry weighs 3900 pounds and a Lamborghini Countach weighs 3600 pounds. My friend claims that driving the F1 is more like a Works GP Motorcycle accelerating more than a car would. A power to weight ratio in the F1 makes it a classic and top of the top. I wish MaClaren would not dilute the brand with v-6 or whatever. Just build a Super F1 and LET THE SAME DESIGNER AS THE ORIGINAL F1, design it. THat would be worth seeing. RH dsd
There is nothing like the sound of a Tuned V-12 at Full Power. Nothing on this earth.
You're right, but there is a reason why: a V-12 sounds wonderful but only if it has a 60-degree vee angle, just like the Merlin. The 1960s Ferrari V-12s made heavenly sounds, not the raspy noise of its modern engines. It's a similar feeling when listening to traditional melodies versus modern atonal music.
An amazing piece of art.
WHAT HAPPENS AT THE 3:27 MINUTE MARK IS SPECTACULAR!!!!!! I know its probably the camera effect of shutter speed etc but its goddam amazing!!!
Nothing beats the sound of a Merlin engine........ apart from 4 bolted to a Lancaster 😀😀👍
Jay Leno is right: "THERE IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT"👌
Peter43John sadly the Merlin was one of the smaller aircraft engines used in WW II Only a trainer like the AT ^ Texan had a smaller engine about 1300 cu in. Merlin was 1650 !!!!
The greatest engine ever built
THAT is a thing of unutterable beauty.
I have on several occasions stood in front of both a Spitfire and Lancaster with the engine(s) running at full throttle, in the case of the Lancaster that was 3300 RPM at 12lbs boost. I can assure you the noise is vastly in excess of what this guy has here, and the sound of those airworthy engines, even at max throttle, was vastly purer and sweeter, this one sounds as rough as a bag of spanners.
They sound incredible when you're sitting in the second seat on a P-51 mustang,, with that monster screaming at full throttle 5 ft in front of you. Best plane ride I ever took
I clapped at the end of this too. they are still impressive engines
I'm curious, what would be the replacement cost of that engine from an insurance point of view? Also, have you ever been approached by museums wanting to purchase your engine for a restoration project?- Thanks for posting.
Almost 80 years before the Veyron and approx 50% more power!
yes but also about 200% bigger
yeah but much bigger displacement!
which is exactly why it has so much more power
and also triple the liters and probably waaaay less efficiency
Jursh Wells You miss the point. It's an ancient antique, which outstrips modern engines for power. Imagine if the same people could use their wisdom, with todays tech?
Its almost a miracle limey engineering developed this wonderful engine. And it was reliable.
I went to Garstang rally, Lancashire years ago, and they had a mounted Merlin like this running, and also a Rolls Royce Griffon (Avro Shackleton engine). Although both of them ran, they had faults that meant they were not suitable for fitting in airworthy aircraft.
Imagine you are sitting in back seat of spitfire, this beast just screams in your cabin and you are firing machine gun on German airplanes.
Back seat of a Spitfire. Where are you from buddy?
@@PenzancePete I'm from Iran 💚. Sorry if I said something wrong
Nothing but ptsd no one was really prepared for war may they rest in peace
P-51*
And your buddy in the hurricane keeps hitting all the targets before your wobbly ass spitfire
I guess it would become really spectacular if you would take the handbrake of the trailer..............;)
rik timmermans *off NOT of.
I wouldn't have chosen to stand in front of it, I'll tell you that much!
Will this fit in a Honda? #mightycarmods
You mean will a honda fit in it?
Morten Ramsing yes. show us the pictures when you're done!
Morten Ramsing Turbo Yoda says no!
Morten Ramsing that be epic
Morten Ramsing putting this on a Honda will still make it a piece of shit
I DON'T CARE what anybody says that is the best sounding engine in the WORLD!!!! & Built by the best company ROLLS ROYCE. That MERLIN engine I LOVE IT!!!!! 😍😍😍😍. Well the engine has been put in a car a BENTLEY. & it sounds just as BEAUTIFUL in the car as it does in that MAGNIFICENT AIRCRAFT the SPITFIRE! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏
Dr Who You do know FORD/UK built 33,000 of them And Packard in the USA built 55,523 of them don't you ?????? NOT all built by Rolls Royce !!!!
00:58 | Pre-oiler?
Thinking of the power output of a Merlin in it's latest form, and one that was built new today with electronic fuel injection, computer ignition mapping I wonder what the power output would be attained. I think it would be phenomenal!
I need that fan for my desk top computer
The finest engine ever built.
Those engines are a work of art just stationary to me. This engine had a lot to do with keeping England free from German tyranny in WW2.
"Free from tyranny" I'm not sure.
Anthony J. , You could be right, I guess it helped a lot during the war but maybe I was a little too optimistic.🤔
Best sounding and in general engine in my opinion ever created.
I have just finished reading a majority of the comments about this video and the "fact" that the operator never ran it up to full throttle because of...
So I challenge you experts to back up your reasoning with some real facts and stop the nonsense!
First) The propeller is much smaller diameter for this kind of display usage.
Second) The style of the propeller is called a "Variable Pitch Prop" where the angle of the blades can be adjusted from an almost flat position to a fully feathered position (to minimize drag on the aircraft while flying if the motor was damaged/shutdown)
Third) Another person commented that the blades could very well be "fixed" and locked down in pitch (something only the owner would know for sure), just enough pitch to produce a load on the engine and airflow across the radiator).
Fourth) This video was recorded using a "VIDEO" camera. Video cameras do not have "shutters" inside of them. It is the "FRAME RATE" of the video camera (industry standard with a few exceptions, that is based upon the ability of the human eye to see "motion" from flickering cards or picture frames above a certain frequency, or frames per second, which is 24 FPS), that causes the "wagon wheel affect" or more accurately the "Stroboscopic" affect.
Fifth) I have personally stood next to an F-111F while one of its engines were being ran for testing/troubleshooting, with 7 stage afterburner lit up. That would be 25,100 pounds of thrust and the only things holding it were the wheel chocks and full on brakes in the cockpit by the technician. The aircraft never moved during that test!! I've had the opportunity to eye witness these engine test runs on at least a dozen occasions, without incident, during my active duty time in the Air Force.
Sixth) Unless you have a tachometer displaying the actual RPM of the motor, it is just a "Guess-timate" people are writing of the RPM of the motor. What are they basing that on? The wind speed blowing back over the "owner"? read first, second and third; the rotational speed of the propeller? Read fourth; Or perhaps, they are judging the engine RPM based upon the sound of the engine? Well, Read Seventh;
Seventh) Unless the owner of the video camera recording this video just so happened to have an aftermarket microphone capable of handling upwards of 130-35 dB plugged in, the audio from this video wouldn't even come close to reproducing the actual exhaust volume level that this engine was producing live! No cell phone manufacturer provides that capability for their cell phone mics!
Now I do agree with several comments about the engine not "sounding" at its best, a couple of backfires, etc. possibly affecting the full throttle power. But, no one but the operator of the engine really knows if he ran it up to full throttle or not!
Although I do concur with and fully agree with the comments about not standing on either side of the plane of rotation of the propeller, the comments about hamburger meat etc. for those standing in front of the engine (30 feet of more) are really just based on ignorance!!
BTW, no one had commented about, therefore didn't pay attention to, the fact that the man operating the engine is holding some sort of cable in his hand, that went with him as he backed off from the engine. I can't prove it but I would be willing to bet that it is some sort of a "Kill" of "Dead man" switch that would shut down the engine very quickly in case of any emergency!
Jay Leno has the exact same kind of an engine (Merlin 2 stage compressor, V-12) on a transportable engine stand. I had just watched his video about it on youtube last month. He talked about replacing his damaged radiator, how much coolant, etc. the engine contained (self-contained). Except for fuel and batteries, these aircraft engines had to be completely self contained for ease of replacement and to keep damage from spreading to the other engines of a multi-engine aircraft.
It would be nice if those who don't know what they are writing about would not write it for the public to read!!
+ebonyblitz1 You touch on the correct reasons for not being full throttle. The engine note is not close to full throttle if you compare with aircraft on takeoff or high RPM ground test. We don't have a tachometer reading but here is a high-power Spitfire test, with some nice prop torque for extra effect. th-cam.com/video/jETagNM1tfg/w-d-xo.html Arguably "full throttle" is War-Emergency Power and that can damage the engine over long periods, so it would not be full throttle. The second reason for not being full throttle is the cut down propeller with a smaller mass. It would be very easy to over-speed the engine at higher throttle settings and things inside will break or begin to come apart. The owner would not want to damage his carefully rebuilt display engine. Here is a nice picture of a connecting rod failure that split a Merlin in half. 1.bp.blogspot.com/-nhr05HgolkM/TnZT9qUAuqI/AAAAAAAAAac/GmkCI4yRJXs/s1600/P9152832.JPG
Um verdadeiro monstro da antiga engenharia.
Seller: So how big should your ventilator be?
Me: YES
Although it sounds different (for obvious reasons) than the drag cars nearby, it also sounds good. To me, it's kind of vicious, but also somehow soothing. If that makes any sense to you. Admittedly, I like the sound of both, the drag cars and the aircraft engine. Since this was filmed 9 years ago, I'm hoping nothing bad happened to it, and I hope they put it into something it would originally have gone into, such as a P51 mustang. I know there were other planes that used this engine, but that's one of the most famous aircraft to use it.
Amazingly well designed engine that was a big part in allowing the Allies to win, the Brits nailed it with that design and with the help of us Americans we made alooooot of them.
I found the engineering of the display/demo engine mounting trailer ALSO fascinating as the Merlin while considering what the owner/builder/collector wanted to use the engine for: spectacular, affordable, portable, mobile indoor/outdoor public historical appreciation displays and demonstrations.
But the huge propeller wash and foul startup exhaust are being fought throughout the show by the hapless controller(s). Using that same engineering brilliance to engineer the controls outside the blast area seems easily done. Further, protective eyewear should always be worn directly behind a running engine, imho. This Merlin's a magnificent, masterfully made and restored machine and sheer wonder to behold. Ittssa swords to plowshares transformation, so to speak, farming for future minds.
"Early production Merlins had numerous problems that led to their reliability being questioned. The leaked their coolants and the cylinder head frequently cracked. However, by version Merlin ‘F’ all major issues had been resolved and the engine officially became Merlin Mark I."
History Learning Site UK Rolls Royce Merlin
The Merlin is often thought of as exceptional engineering but, as you say, there was a tortuous development. RR was reluctant to get into this business. I think those who pushed for it knew RR, once engaged, would be obsessive about getting it right.
The prop is obviously a slip arrangement just for show. If the prop was full-on gear driven, the rig would rip out of the ground, make hamburger out of everyone around it, and self destruct during the process.
I'm sorry but the way you put it... Make ha!burger out of everyone... Was funny!!! Lol
+Randel Allee The thrust of these engines are largely controlled by propeller pitch.
Randel Allee Nope! They just changed the propeller pitch!
Guy Martin owns one of these and it did once destroy quite a lot of the building it was in
Trust me that props moving Optical contusions in your brain and cameras magic makes it look still or backwards even. Any turntable with a strobe can show you that "trick"
The most beautiful engine ever built. A beast, by any standard.
That's the biggest thermostatic fan I've ever seen on an engine ;)
Dunkirk brought me here
Same
So, you were a captured German Nazi ,
I installed a Merlin into a 1985 Toyota MR 2. It fit right into the engine bay, and bolted right up to the stock motor mounts too! It very convenient, and there was still lots of room around the engine to do maintenance! I was even thinking of installing either a 2nd Merlin into the MR 2, right beside the first one, or installing a Pratt & Whitney R2800 radial beside the Merlin in the MR 2. It would probably be more balanced that way. Still have the stock suspension and shocks too! But I am concerned that it still won't have quite enough torque to get the MR 2 up shallow hills, with 2 large airplane engines though.....
I call bullshit, there has to be space left for a Mercedes om606 diesel engine there too
So I have one on my lawn mower.
MR 2 ......
Mmmmm
.... no ....
I don't think Gino got the joke. Bless your soul.
R2800 isn't enough, only 18 cylinders. Try an R4360, 28 cylinders. If you're pulling a small trailer you should go diesel - Napier Deltic, or Zvedza M503 (144 litres, 42 cylinders) or M504 (56 cylinders). For a full size camping trailer, you need a Zvedza M507, though I'm not sure 384 liters / 112 cylinders is enough for that.
This is the engine the Spitfire used, right?
Yep.
also in the p-51
Also the Lancaster the Hurricane Mosquito, was about the only engine the Brits had that was worth a damn....
AEthelstan Packard did more than "Just build them under license" they improved them and built tens of thousands of them for the Brits, thats why Packard was building them...the Brits could not build them fast enough. You need to get your facts straight, been researching the Packard involvement for many years,,,
AEthelstan Rolls Royce came to Packard and paid Packard $130,000,000.00 to build engines for Rolls Royce....pretty simple isn't it???And Packard went on to not only build the engine but modify it nd improve it and to mass produce it. Packard in 4 years built 55,525 engines and all but abot 12,000 went to the British. Packard did the Brits and Rolls Royce a HUGE favor by building this engine as The Brits could not build them fast enough. The British built Lancaster Mk B III was the largest used of the Packard built merlin 3,440, ONE HALF the total Lancaster production used the Packard built engine. It was a WIN WIN for the Brits that Packard built the engines for them...Is that so hard to understand?????
Great motor! And no smoke!!! Ecological!
Man that afterfire sounds awesome!
WHY is it that everywhere you go, where the "sound of the moment" is part of the experience, the announcer will NOT SHUT UP
Clearly this is a side show demo taking place where a head lining event was taking place that had priority.
Those of you that no NOTHING about airplanes, listen up, the engines do not run at 8000 rpm.. That would be stupid..
Find your facts and then come back and be amazed at this engine, that prop is for show and tell and to run air to cool..
Power output:
2,035 hp (1,520 kW) at 7,000 ft (2,135 m MS gear),[nb 7] +18 psi boost pressure at 2,750 rpm
2,220 hp (1,655 kW) at 11,000 ft (2,135 m MS gear), +21 psi at 2,750 r.p.m using 150 Octane fuel
No need to be such a snotty know-it-all. You can correct inaccurate opinions without being a total arse.
Ian Findlay Fuck off, when dealing with stupid people it helps to get their attention, since it only lasts 5 minutes.. And that is not snotty, it is the truth, they have no idea what they are looking at and make a stupid comment..........Like yours..
No, I have to see how ugly and stupid looks like and you fit that bill.. I was right on both parts....
Love how the video progressive scanning can't keep up with the propeller blade. So the blade appears to suddenly stand still or slowly go backwards when it spinning fast.
has nothing to do with progressive scanning.
Same thing with your eyes too.
PMSL. It's actually called wagon wheel effect. Nothing to do with progressive scanning or what ever BS you called it. :-)
I like the strobing effect of the propeller with the camera.
What a beautiful engine.
Why isn't the trailer moving forward with all that wind pressure
I'm not certain but I'd guess the prop pitch is very minimal and the prop is likely not as large as it would be if fitted to an actual aircraft, both would severly limit the thrust produced.
It’s only a small prop to give the engine some load. The actual prop is ten feet in diameter
Maybe the wheels have brake as well as small prop/thrust.
It's probably a variable pitch prop off of a corsair with modified pitch, just like the rest of them. I have yet to see a display with an original 4-blade prop off of a real mustang. Or at anywhere close to full throttle.
@@bryanseitz6235 Thats because the 20 series early merlins used a 3 bladed prop !!! DUUUHH!!!! Only the LATER 60 series Merlins and the PACKARD V1650-3 or -7 used a 4 bladed prop !!!! FYI That engine version NOT used in a Mustang !!!! FYI !!!!
Full throttle? A joke surely, scarcely more than fast tick over, otherwise operators (including a teenaged boy!) would be blown flat.
Mostly correct. Since they are using cut-down props there will not be a full load on the engine. They would never go full throttle since the engine would over-speed and start breaking things or come apart.
FiveCentsPlease Aero engines tend to be low revving with lots of torque. The Merlin's happiest about 2400rpm.
1946nimrod
Correct.
+Gruntol5 it still might be full throttle. The thrust of these engines are largely controlled by propeller pitch.
The merlin was able to produce full power at 3000rpm not 2400. 2400 rpm is where things just started getting interesting.
It looks weird that the shutterspeed make the prop look like its not really moving fast :P
Awesome engine, powered the Spitfire, Mustang, mosquito and many other planes and tanks.
What a beautiful piece of machinery and engineering.
>now having this vision of having one in my garage and pulling it out once in awhile and running it just for fun
Absolutely NO WHERE NEAR full throttle
A 27 liter dont rev lika a chainsaw
Magnus Engström - I agree
I love how the camera make the prop look like its barely moving!
Full Throttle huh?
should have said high idle...
Mattssalvage LOL at full speed it would have flown into the crowd!
Joshua Johnson hahahaha man that would ruin your day for sure
yeah it would!
Now that is what i call a fabulous desk fan lol,seriously though its gorgeous what an engine and no way is it near any full throttle lol as some have suggested the trailer would never hold it.
+mark farley
two words "variable" "pitch" . . the prop has blades that can turn to a flat angle and produce no thrust at all or only enough to cool the engine in this case, but even at half throttle or so ( FULL THROTTLE my ass) had it been turned to max thrust output i thing the trailer would at least start to act up a bit
+mark farley
two words "variable" "pitch" . . the prop has blades that can turn to a flat angle and produce no thrust at all or only enough to cool the engine in this case, but even at half throttle or so ( FULL THROTTLE my ass) had it been turned to max thrust output i thing the trailer would at least start to act up a bit
+mark farley A top Gear Desk Fan I would say! lol
Don't you just love it when the camera frame rate is in timming with the propellers