My Allaah preserve you and reward you abundantly Ustadh. When the doubts are, negligence and extremisms are many it's a blessing to have just and firm teachers to clarify the religion. May Allah increase you in knowledge and bravery, raise your rank
Wallahi I love ustadh عبد الرحمن, he's a recent graduate from Medinah University or perhaps from a couple of years back, I love his balanced way just like many other brothers whom I know are firm upon the Sunnah and upon the way of the Salaf.
Mashaallah, may Allah reward you for your effort of bringing balance into this fitna. I think you need to elaborate more on the distinguishing grey line between falling into one of the extremes. I think what you regarding testing people with people will confuse a lot of people, because based on your speech you mentioned it as both extreme and.balanced. Barakallah feek
Assalamu alaykum ue rahmetullah brothers, I have an off topic question: how is the situation with the coronavirus measures in the UK currently? Is life starting to normalise? Are all mosques open again (even with holding distance)? I plan to go to Birmingham in autumn for an exchange and it seems that in spite of coronavirus it will still be possible. Can anybody give me some information?
@@mohammedhabeeb5848 it may seem weird for people who live in the UK but for people who live in other European countries the Uk/Birmingham is quite attractive because you feel like you can live your religion much better (aside from the real muslim countries of course)
Where in the Qur'an or in the explicit words of the Prophet or the Companions or their immediate successors (Salaf) do you find any of these so-called "criteria of innovation"? These very criteria are innovation, without a single evidence in the Book, in the Sunna of the Prophet or the Ijmaa' of Companions/Successors. This hostile sectarianism goes against the very explicit verse of the Qur'an: مُنِيبِينَ إِلَيْهِ وَاتَّقُوهُ وَأَقِيمُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَلَا تَكُونُوا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ مِنَ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا ۖ كُلُّ حِزْبٍ بِمَا لَدَيْهِمْ فَرِحُونَ Turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah [Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
Could you present yourself as I can't see anything about you. As you know we need to know the minhaj of people who are listening to. I'll make it easy: - do you cooperate with the salafi in UK, like Abu Hakeem, Abu Idrees, Abu muadh,..? - what is your stance with Sheikh Rabi almadkhali ? - What do you say about the ruler of Saudi? Thanks
Is Abu Hakeem, Abu Idrees and Abu Muadth are the only known salafis in UK. Follow ustadth Abdurahman Hassan for just a day you will know his manhaj is correct
@life Lesson isn't calling brothers a hizb tabdee'? Also, for the reason you call spubs a hizb, do you call the scholsrs who hold the same view as spubs as a hizb?
A problem with salafism is the obsession with classification of people. Only Allah can perfectly judge people. They equate aqeedah with iman. If ur aqeedah is correct , they think ur all good, ur iman is strong , ur intention is good, ur actions accepted, ur character perfected!!. No it’s not!! Also they’ll judge people upon one statement sometimes. This leads to childish refutation culture. ‘You going to hell’, ‘no u going to hell’, sounds like schoolyard
@@AltaHABANI It is part of islam but many times it's the ego, pride, hate that provoke a da'ee to tag others as bidati. They will use islamic way to prove the other is bidati but the origin of this is ego. They'll be super picky just to prove a bidah and feel better about it. Is that scholarship?
WhiteChocolateMocha well Islam is about the truth and when someone is calling as innovators then that person must come with their proof. It doesn’t work like I THINK OR I SUSPECT OR IT SEEMS and so on. This is one of the beautiful things about this religion. If you read a lot of Islamic literature you find in situations where scholars don’t accept a refutation of a specific sheik on a specific issue and they say that the sheik was supporting his own group or his own madhab and so on. Please read a lot and you will be surprised
Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (d.728H) - rahimahullaah - said in Majmoo’ul-Fataawaa (15/330), Statement of Ibn Taymiyyah from Majmoo’ul-Fataawaa (15/330). “And knowledge about the conditions of the people comes through the testimonies of people at times and through al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel at times and through testing and trial at times.” By the way some of the Scholars differed about testing people witj individuals , but one thing is the salaf did test people. So one should ask themselves, did shaykh ibn taymiyyah oppose the salaf or did one misunderstand the speech of Ibn taymiyyah regarding placing love and hate based on individuals and using that to test people? Also a scholsrs statement in our time is not hujjah if there isn't evidence behind it, scholars differ now but see who has the evidence. Some scholars seem to say testing people is hizbiyyah in the context of the questioner, yet they affirm that the salaf tested people and say it's allowed. For example if someone in the question asks about testing random person on the street and another asks testing someone who's speech is seeming to be a bit dodgey and one is not sure what they're upon/one wants to know if they can acconpanyhim, then the answers can be different. I believe abdul rahman hassan's answer above was in context of texting the duaat known for sunnah with individuals, but anyways the Ustadh is not perfect and could be right or wrong, see what the scholars say and their evidence. sunnahpublishing.net/the-principle-of-testing-individuals-by-their-love-or-hatred-of-ahlus-sunnah-is-affirmed-in-our-times/
I have just listened to the whole lecture and its riddled with discrepancies. You mentioned in the beginning that a group is not allowed to make imtihan and test the people by specific scholars to test if someone is a sunni/salafi, yet at the end, you then say its ok to do this. You then mentioned that its ok for a normal person to qualify someone as an innovator and its not necessary to seek a scholars approval, however, scholars unanimously say tabdee should be left for the scholars. Unless of course someone by their own admission would say they are not sunni, but if someone declares they are sunni/salafi then it wouldn't be right to give out carte blanche on laymen ruling someone a mubtadee. I humbly advise you that if you want to cover these topics properly write them in a book and then get peers to go through it, then teach it, according to your book. That way you will discount any shubuhat and shahawat that may raise its head.
@@osmanmohamedadem5185 There is a famous Poem infamous by Al Albani stating. Everyone declared their love to Layla but Layla never attested her love to any of them. With that being said, Spubs people on your principle can turn around and declare their scholars well known scholars and experts in said specific field, thus legitimising their edicts, then Abur Rahman will turn around and state indeed it is his scholars who are rightly guided and who are more so well known. Thus spiralling into a fallacy of Authority. All I am saying is that the scholars have unanimously stated not to give out verdicts or edicts if you are unqualified and unauthorised. This brazen act of quackery is what has resulted in complete and utter splinter cell central in the western world. It would have had great ramifications in the Middle East had it not been for the heavy hand of tyrants who ensure that these groups are monitored and dealt with in a small contained fashion.
@@osmanmohamedadem5185 There is indeed crossover where there is a unified position taken on some people such as Yusuf Al Qardhawi, however that isn't the issue. The issue is the more esoteric side of things where Spubs chosen scholars have declared the likes of Ihya Turath and Yahya AL Hajoori are to be stayed cleared from. Abur Rahman may take an alternate opinion and say benefits can still be taken from them. The issue has never been about what has been agreed upon, it has always been a matter of what hasn't been agreed upon, I hope that makes sense.
Ustadh عبد الرحمن You have quoted statements from the scholars such as ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله تعالى and the rest in regards to tabde'e and its principals. My question is, you brother عبد الرحمن sat down and cooperated with muhammad hijab, who is a clear innovator, he calls to hizbiyyah openly. Isn't that hizbiyyah? Not only you but also your student abu taymiyyah did the same. Another issue is, it is clear that you may not take knowledge from shaykh Rabeè bin hadi, but we find scholars of today calling people to take knowledge from the sahykh and defend and praise the shaykh, so don't you think that you are going against the manhaj and you are actually calling people (your followers) to boycott the shaykh? for you to talk about SPUBS clearly in this video and their shaykh (Rabèe) without rectifying that you are upon the shaykh's aqeedah and you take from him is also a type of refutation on the shaykh. Lastly, why didn't you rectify Hijab when he interviewed you of his mistakes in aqeedah? Or is everything for views on TH-cam (£££). Imam ahmad warned against sitting and cooperating with the people of bid'ah in usul us sunnah, and other imams did too. Do not be like Bro Hajji and his methodology, be upright brother. May Allah safeguard us all.
Firstly, akhi, bārakallāhu feek, your rushing to attack Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan and not taking the time to understand the reasons why he decided to be in the Mohammed Hijab's podcast. Mohammed Hijab invited Yasir Qadhi in his podcast whilst casting aspersions on the preservation of the Book of Allāh and spreading his venoms and doubts to the Muslims. Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan took this opportunity to expel these doubts and expose the falsehood of those casting aspersions on the Book of Allāh through the same channel. There is nothing wrong with this. It is said this is *cooperating* with the people of innovation, thus becoming an innovator himself. This is what they did to ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿAbd ur-Razzāq al-Badr حفظه الله when he went to go give a lecture at Iḥyā at-Turāth. They rushed to attack him, denigrate him, and assassinate his character and reputation; as done by the head of fitan, ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī. Yet, the kibār (major scholars) have clarified that there is nothing wrong with answering the requests of the people of innovation in giving advise and lectures to them, however, it is a must to clarify the truth and combat falsehood. That's the condition they unequivocally established. See the videos below ⬇️: Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿAbd ul-Muḥsin al-ʿAbbād. th-cam.com/video/ZZHVw0E3sG8/w-d-xo.html ___ Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Zayd al-Madkhalī. th-cam.com/video/5CCLQjYouWU/w-d-xo.html ___ Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿUbayd al-Jābirī. th-cam.com/video/hCTluUtMuFI/w-d-xo.html _______ Also, Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan has always clarified that he respects ash-Sheikh Rabeeʾ bin Hādī al-Madkhalī. He takes knowledge from him and advises the Muslims to benefit from him.
brother you are speaking to an English speaking audience of mostly lay people. You say that 'anyone can declare a person a mubtadi' for not using the 3 primary sources for islam. 'Anyone' is a broad term and you are opening a door of sharr. This statement lacks hikmah. Happy to discuss if you want. Also the books you referenced to support that position are not for lay people. Rather they are addressing scholars and people of knowledge, not mandem from Croydon.
The person who rejects any part of the مصادر التلقي (Qur'an, sunnah and ijma) is not even in ahlu sunnah in the first place, so declaring them to be an innovator is not the same as declaring a person who was in ahlu sunnah as an innovator for committing some form of bid'ah. It's like the difference between calling a christian, atheist etc kaafir, and calling a muslim who has committed shirk kaafir. Any muslim can make takfeer of a christian, but only people of knowledge can make takfeer of a muslim eho commits kufr. The same principle applies to tabdee'
@@reactionary not exactly, rejecting the Qur'an or part of it, as well as rejecting the ahaadeeth as a whole is kufr, however rejecting singular narrations ( آحاد الأحاديث), or 'ijma is a bid'ah not kufr. For example, some groups of ahlul bid'ah (asha'irah, maturidiyyah etc) reject singular ahaadeeth in matters of aqeedah, and this is a bid'ah, but it is not kufr. So you fell into the same mistake which you were criticising the ustadh about by making general statements without clarification
@@themansami I didnt fall into a mistake, I simply kept my point succinct. One of the preventions of Takfir results in the person being called misguided as opposed to being called kafir. please dont fall into blindly following personalities.
@@reactionary No, you did fall into a mistake, because you said that rejecting the 3 sources of the shariah is kufr, and that is not accurate at all, because some forms are kufr whilst others are bidah, as I demonstrated. Also, ustadh was very clear with what he said, so if you didn't understand it then I think the problem is with you. Please go learn the deen before making ignorant comments
Stopped watching your videos after seeing you in the outfits of the mushrikeen.. Is wearing saffron a prohibited act in Islam? Waiting for clarification.. JazakAllahu khairan..
@@reactionary because they were shocked to see that the questioner acted before establishing the proof. Knowledge precedes speech and action. It is not right the Ustaad to clarify his stance but the one who's asking is to proof whether sa'froon can be worn or not.
The general principle is that everything is permissible in the Dunya until proven impermissible. Secondly Ustādh is not obliged to answer your questions. If you want to know the ruling then do some research from reliable sources, stop demanding answers this is not from the characteristics of a tālibul ‘ilm. بارك الله فيك
It is only haram if the clothing is actually dyed using saffron. So if it has saffron colour, but it was made from a different source, either artificially or using a different tyoe of dye, then it is permissible by 'ijma of the scholars. So how do you know that his clothes are actually dyed using saffron?
@@anmfarhan6867 you kidding me, him and Abu taymiah do live pod casts with him laughing and joking, not refuting his ashri/philosophy aqeedah, confusing the people MH is a man of bidah, he even confused so. Many ppl with his YQ podcast all these clowns are halibis boys, be easy with the innovators.
@J A my brother, the salafi used to say show us your men and I'll show you who you are, sitting with ppl of bidah without clarity of mistakes is not our way never has been. Who preceeded him? No one? It's ijma among the salaf this is not done unless you clarify.
A very beneficial channel in my opinion, the right way to begin studying the correct methodology
The aesthetics are on point!
Right!! It’s absolutely stunning!
Allahu Akbar! A knowledge based refutation of a certain HIZB. Very beneficial series.
If one calls omeone a hizb is that not alao tabdee'?
My Allaah preserve you and reward you abundantly Ustadh. When the doubts are, negligence and extremisms are many it's a blessing to have just and firm teachers to clarify the religion. May Allah increase you in knowledge and bravery, raise your rank
We have to play this video in a great screen in speaker's corner
Hahahahaaa...yeah right
اللهم ارزقنا علما نافعا وعملا صالحا.
Wallahi I love ustadh عبد الرحمن, he's a recent graduate from Medinah University or perhaps from a couple of years back, I love his balanced way just like many other brothers whom I know are firm upon the Sunnah and upon the way of the Salaf.
Mashaallah, may Allah reward you for your effort of bringing balance into this fitna. I think you need to elaborate more on the distinguishing grey line between falling into one of the extremes. I think what you regarding testing people with people will confuse a lot of people, because based on your speech you mentioned it as both extreme and.balanced.
Barakallah feek
جزاك الله خيرا شيخ. الله اكبر. ماشاء الله. بارك اللّٰه فيك
Beautiful style sheikh, very good lecture mashaAllah
I love your orange color Masha Allah. Looks so good.
Assalamu alaykum ue rahmetullah brothers, I have an off topic question: how is the situation with the coronavirus measures in the UK currently? Is life starting to normalise? Are all mosques open again (even with holding distance)?
I plan to go to Birmingham in autumn for an exchange and it seems that in spite of coronavirus it will still be possible.
Can anybody give me some information?
of all the places you could’ve looked up😂😂😂
@@mohammedhabeeb5848 it may seem weird for people who live in the UK but for people who live in other European countries the Uk/Birmingham is quite attractive because you feel like you can live your religion much better (aside from the real muslim countries of course)
Jzakallahu khairan ustadh
What is the nasheed in the beginning?
th-cam.com/video/boYrg7Qv1YE/w-d-xo.html
Jazakallah Khaira
Meaning of Tabdi please?
Tabdi is to rule out someone as an innovator akhi
I don't know why but please the mic sound shoukd should be increased a little bit
Would you need a fatwa from an alim in order to make tabdee muyyain on a clear cut takfiri or khariji? Inshaallah break down this point further.
No you don't. Shaykh Fawzān and Abdulaziz al rajihi said you can
Can a general tabdee be made for an Ashari person or does iqamatul hujja have to be made?
Iqamat alhujjah , their shubha is strong and allah knows best
those 11 dislikes are ahlul bida'h
Where in the Qur'an or in the explicit words of the Prophet or the Companions or their immediate successors (Salaf) do you find any of these so-called "criteria of innovation"?
These very criteria are innovation, without a single evidence in the Book, in the Sunna of the Prophet or the Ijmaa' of Companions/Successors.
This hostile sectarianism goes against the very explicit verse of the Qur'an:
مُنِيبِينَ إِلَيْهِ وَاتَّقُوهُ وَأَقِيمُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَلَا تَكُونُوا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
مِنَ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا ۖ كُلُّ حِزْبٍ بِمَا لَدَيْهِمْ فَرِحُونَ
Turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah
[Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
Could you present yourself as I can't see anything about you. As you know we need to know the minhaj of people who are listening to.
I'll make it easy:
- do you cooperate with the salafi in UK, like Abu Hakeem, Abu Idrees, Abu muadh,..?
- what is your stance with Sheikh Rabi almadkhali ?
- What do you say about the ruler of Saudi?
Thanks
Why are you guys testing people who are upon correct manhaj to one specific scholar?
Is Abu Hakeem, Abu Idrees and Abu Muadth are the only known salafis in UK. Follow ustadth Abdurahman Hassan for just a day you will know his manhaj is correct
@life Lesson well said brother, May Allah SWT grant them the understanding of salafia and take them out of their innovation (bidaAh)
Ok. Thank you. I know now.
@life Lesson isn't calling brothers a hizb tabdee'?
Also, for the reason you call spubs a hizb, do you call the scholsrs who hold the same view as spubs as a hizb?
A problem with salafism is the obsession with classification of people. Only Allah can perfectly judge people. They equate aqeedah with iman. If ur aqeedah is correct , they think ur all good, ur iman is strong , ur intention is good, ur actions accepted, ur character perfected!!. No it’s not!! Also they’ll judge people upon one statement sometimes. This leads to childish refutation culture. ‘You going to hell’, ‘no u going to hell’, sounds like schoolyard
If someone is doing an innovation then that’s an innovation. Telling people what’s right and wrong it’s part of Islam
@@AltaHABANI It is part of islam but many times it's the ego, pride, hate that provoke a da'ee to tag others as bidati. They will use islamic way to prove the other is bidati but the origin of this is ego. They'll be super picky just to prove a bidah and feel better about it. Is that scholarship?
WhiteChocolateMocha well Islam is about the truth and when someone is calling as innovators then that person must come with their proof. It doesn’t work like I THINK OR I SUSPECT OR IT SEEMS and so on. This is one of the beautiful things about this religion. If you read a lot of Islamic literature you find in situations where scholars don’t accept a refutation of a specific sheik on a specific issue and they say that the sheik was supporting his own group or his own madhab and so on. Please read a lot and you will be surprised
So who is imam of Jarh wa Ta'dil of this era?
I'm joking though 😁😁😁
loooool man some culty fitna
Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (d.728H) - rahimahullaah - said in Majmoo’ul-Fataawaa (15/330),
Statement of Ibn Taymiyyah from Majmoo’ul-Fataawaa (15/330).
“And knowledge about the conditions of the people comes through the testimonies of people at times and through al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel at times and through testing and trial at times.”
By the way some of the Scholars differed about testing people witj individuals , but one thing is the salaf did test people.
So one should ask themselves, did shaykh ibn taymiyyah oppose the salaf or did one misunderstand the speech of Ibn taymiyyah regarding placing love and hate based on individuals and using that to test people?
Also a scholsrs statement in our time is not hujjah if there isn't evidence behind it, scholars differ now but see who has the evidence. Some scholars seem to say testing people is hizbiyyah in the context of the questioner, yet they affirm that the salaf tested people and say it's allowed. For example if someone in the question asks about testing random person on the street and another asks testing someone who's speech is seeming to be a bit dodgey and one is not sure what they're upon/one wants to know if they can acconpanyhim, then the answers can be different.
I believe abdul rahman hassan's answer above was in context of texting the duaat known for sunnah with individuals, but anyways the Ustadh is not perfect and could be right or wrong, see what the scholars say and their evidence.
sunnahpublishing.net/the-principle-of-testing-individuals-by-their-love-or-hatred-of-ahlus-sunnah-is-affirmed-in-our-times/
I have just listened to the whole lecture and its riddled with discrepancies. You mentioned in the beginning that a group is not allowed to make imtihan and test the people by specific scholars to test if someone is a sunni/salafi, yet at the end, you then say its ok to do this. You then mentioned that its ok for a normal person to qualify someone as an innovator and its not necessary to seek a scholars approval, however, scholars unanimously say tabdee should be left for the scholars. Unless of course someone by their own admission would say they are not sunni, but if someone declares they are sunni/salafi then it wouldn't be right to give out carte blanche on laymen ruling someone a mubtadee. I humbly advise you that if you want to cover these topics properly write them in a book and then get peers to go through it, then teach it, according to your book. That way you will discount any shubuhat and shahawat that may raise its head.
@@osmanmohamedadem5185 There is a famous Poem infamous by Al Albani stating.
Everyone declared their love to Layla but Layla never attested her love to any of them.
With that being said, Spubs people on your principle can turn around and declare their scholars well known scholars and experts in said specific field, thus legitimising their edicts, then Abur Rahman will turn around and state indeed it is his scholars who are rightly guided and who are more so well known. Thus spiralling into a fallacy of Authority.
All I am saying is that the scholars have unanimously stated not to give out verdicts or edicts if you are unqualified and unauthorised. This brazen act of quackery is what has resulted in complete and utter splinter cell central in the western world. It would have had great ramifications in the Middle East had it not been for the heavy hand of tyrants who ensure that these groups are monitored and dealt with in a small contained fashion.
@@osmanmohamedadem5185 There is indeed crossover where there is a unified position taken on some people such as Yusuf Al Qardhawi, however that isn't the issue. The issue is the more esoteric side of things where Spubs chosen scholars have declared the likes of Ihya Turath and Yahya AL Hajoori are to be stayed cleared from. Abur Rahman may take an alternate opinion and say benefits can still be taken from them. The issue has never been about what has been agreed upon, it has always been a matter of what hasn't been agreed upon, I hope that makes sense.
@Shamsi, listen carefully
Ustadh عبد الرحمن
You have quoted statements from the scholars such as ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله تعالى and the rest in regards to tabde'e and its principals.
My question is, you brother عبد الرحمن sat down and cooperated with muhammad hijab, who is a clear innovator, he calls to hizbiyyah openly. Isn't that hizbiyyah? Not only you but also your student abu taymiyyah did the same.
Another issue is, it is clear that you may not take knowledge from shaykh Rabeè bin hadi, but we find scholars of today calling people to take knowledge from the sahykh and defend and praise the shaykh, so don't you think that you are going against the manhaj and you are actually calling people (your followers) to boycott the shaykh? for you to talk about SPUBS clearly in this video and their shaykh (Rabèe) without rectifying that you are upon the shaykh's aqeedah and you take from him is also a type of refutation on the shaykh.
Lastly, why didn't you rectify Hijab when he interviewed you of his mistakes in aqeedah? Or is everything for views on TH-cam (£££).
Imam ahmad warned against sitting and cooperating with the people of bid'ah in usul us sunnah, and other imams did too.
Do not be like Bro Hajji and his methodology, be upright brother.
May Allah safeguard us all.
Firstly, akhi, bārakallāhu feek, your rushing to attack Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan and not taking the time to understand the reasons why he decided to be in the Mohammed Hijab's podcast. Mohammed Hijab invited Yasir Qadhi in his podcast whilst casting aspersions on the preservation of the Book of Allāh and spreading his venoms and doubts to the Muslims. Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan took this opportunity to expel these doubts and expose the falsehood of those casting aspersions on the Book of Allāh through the same channel. There is nothing wrong with this.
It is said this is *cooperating* with the people of innovation, thus becoming an innovator himself. This is what they did to ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿAbd ur-Razzāq al-Badr حفظه الله when he went to go give a lecture at Iḥyā at-Turāth. They rushed to attack him, denigrate him, and assassinate his character and reputation; as done by the head of fitan, ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī.
Yet, the kibār (major scholars) have clarified that there is nothing wrong with answering the requests of the people of innovation in giving advise and lectures to them, however, it is a must to clarify the truth and combat falsehood. That's the condition they unequivocally established.
See the videos below ⬇️:
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿAbd ul-Muḥsin al-ʿAbbād.
th-cam.com/video/ZZHVw0E3sG8/w-d-xo.html
___
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Zayd al-Madkhalī.
th-cam.com/video/5CCLQjYouWU/w-d-xo.html
___
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿUbayd al-Jābirī.
th-cam.com/video/hCTluUtMuFI/w-d-xo.html
_______
Also, Ustādh ʿAbd ur-Raḥmān Ḥasan has always clarified that he respects ash-Sheikh Rabeeʾ bin Hādī al-Madkhalī. He takes knowledge from him and advises the Muslims to benefit from him.
Me and my friends call this sheikh swaahib daliil...HafidhwahuLlah...
wakhallaswa niyyatahu wabaaraka fii ilmihi wa umrih.
What does that mean Brother?
@@Alqahqah Master of the Proofs & Evidences
@@ImansHomeschool well this is True may Allah reward him
Saahibul-daleel*
brother you are speaking to an English speaking audience of mostly lay people. You say that 'anyone can declare a person a mubtadi' for not using the 3 primary sources for islam. 'Anyone' is a broad term and you are opening a door of sharr.
This statement lacks hikmah. Happy to discuss if you want.
Also the books you referenced to support that position are not for lay people. Rather they are addressing scholars and people of knowledge, not mandem from Croydon.
The person who rejects any part of the مصادر التلقي (Qur'an, sunnah and ijma) is not even in ahlu sunnah in the first place, so declaring them to be an innovator is not the same as declaring a person who was in ahlu sunnah as an innovator for committing some form of bid'ah. It's like the difference between calling a christian, atheist etc kaafir, and calling a muslim who has committed shirk kaafir. Any muslim can make takfeer of a christian, but only people of knowledge can make takfeer of a muslim eho commits kufr. The same principle applies to tabdee'
@@themansami yes, and that wasnt made clear in the brothers talk.
Also, rejecting the sources of the shariah is actually Kufr, not Bidah.
@@reactionary not exactly, rejecting the Qur'an or part of it, as well as rejecting the ahaadeeth as a whole is kufr, however rejecting singular narrations ( آحاد الأحاديث), or 'ijma is a bid'ah not kufr.
For example, some groups of ahlul bid'ah (asha'irah, maturidiyyah etc) reject singular ahaadeeth in matters of aqeedah, and this is a bid'ah, but it is not kufr.
So you fell into the same mistake which you were criticising the ustadh about by making general statements without clarification
@@themansami I didnt fall into a mistake, I simply kept my point succinct. One of the preventions of Takfir results in the person being called misguided as opposed to being called kafir.
please dont fall into blindly following personalities.
@@reactionary No, you did fall into a mistake, because you said that rejecting the 3 sources of the shariah is kufr, and that is not accurate at all, because some forms are kufr whilst others are bidah, as I demonstrated.
Also, ustadh was very clear with what he said, so if you didn't understand it then I think the problem is with you.
Please go learn the deen before making ignorant comments
Stopped watching your videos after seeing you in the outfits of the mushrikeen.. Is wearing saffron a prohibited act in Islam? Waiting for clarification.. JazakAllahu khairan..
Fear Allah! You've stopped watching his videos before knowing the ruling of his outfit and you want the brother to give you a clarification?!
@@adamalm.400 why you answering instead of the person to whom the question was posed?
@@reactionary because they were shocked to see that the questioner acted before establishing the proof. Knowledge precedes speech and action.
It is not right the Ustaad to clarify his stance but the one who's asking is to proof whether sa'froon can be worn or not.
The general principle is that everything is permissible in the Dunya until proven impermissible.
Secondly Ustādh is not obliged to answer your questions. If you want to know the ruling then do some research from reliable sources, stop demanding answers this is not from the characteristics of a tālibul ‘ilm. بارك الله فيك
It is only haram if the clothing is actually dyed using saffron. So if it has saffron colour, but it was made from a different source, either artificially or using a different tyoe of dye, then it is permissible by 'ijma of the scholars.
So how do you know that his clothes are actually dyed using saffron?
Mohamed hijab your boy ain't sunni
So what is he according to you, an innovator ?
muhammad hijab isnt his boy, what are you talking about
@@anmfarhan6867 you kidding me, him and Abu taymiah do live pod casts with him laughing and joking, not refuting his ashri/philosophy aqeedah, confusing the people MH is a man of bidah, he even confused so. Many ppl with his YQ podcast all these clowns are halibis boys, be easy with the innovators.
@@oayysz8909 according to his aqeedah, his lying his minhaj he is. His a Caller to ikwanis minhaj and other crazy stuff.
@J A my brother, the salafi used to say show us your men and I'll show you who you are, sitting with ppl of bidah without clarity of mistakes is not our way never has been. Who preceeded him? No one? It's ijma among the salaf this is not done unless you clarify.